170-1

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 Report of the Committee on

Fire Safety Symbols

Thomas R. Wood, ChairBoca Raton Fire Rescue Services, FL [E]

Phillip A. Brown, American Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc., TX [IM] Rep. American Fire Sprinkler Association Randal G. Brown, Randal Brown & Associates, Ltd., Canada [SE] Randall S. Chaney, Liberty Mutual Property, CA [I] Rep. Alliance of American Insurers David C. Cox, Fire Safety Displays Company, MI [M] August F. DiManno, Jr., Firemanʼs Fund Insurance Company, NY [I] Rocky M. May, Visteon Corporation, MI [U] Edward P. Quinn, Jr., One Beacon Insurance, NY [I] Brad Schiffer, Brad Schiffer/Taxis, Inc., FL [SE] John M. Stofa, S.A. Comunale Fire Protection, NJ [IM] James J. Vorce, Johnson Controls Inc., WI [IM] Don N. Whittaker, US Department of Energy, ID [U]

Alternates

David Johnson, Randal Brown & Associates Ltd., Canada [SE] (Alt. to Randal G. Brown) J. Scott Mitchell, American Fire Sprinkler Association, TX [IM] (Alt. to Phillip A. Brown) Staff Liaison: David R. Hague

Committee Scope: This Committee shall have primary responsibility for documents on fire safety symbols including those for building design plans, investigation diagrams, maps, and for public fire safety. It shall coordinate its work with NFPA technical committees and other groups dealing with subjects to which fire safety symbols apply.

This list represents the membership at the time the Committee was balloted on the text of this edition. Since that time, changes in the membership may have occurred. A key to classifications is found at the front of this book.

The Report of the Technical Committee on Fire Safety Symbols is presented for adoption.

This Report was prepared by the Technical Committee on Fire Safety Symbols and proposes for adoption, amendments to NFPA 170, Standard for Fire Safety Symbols, 2002 edition. NFPA 170-2002 is published in Volume 7of the 2003 National Fire Codes and in separate pamphlet form.

The Technical Committee on Fire Safety Symbols has retitled NFPA 170 to Standard for Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols.

This Report has been submitted to letter ballot of the Technical Committee on Fire Safety Symbols, which consists of 12 voting members. The results of the balloting, after circulation of any negative votes, can be found in the report.

170-2

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 ________________________________________________________________170-1 Log# 3 FIS-AAA Final Action: Reject(Entire Document) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Karin Rountree , Ampco Safety ToolsRecommendation: Anywhere ignition sources are a concern, please include as a requirement; Non-Sparking Tools are required where hazardous, combustible or flammable gases, liquids, dusts, or residues are present.Substantiation: Ordinary hand tools are usually made of steel and if struck, scraped, or dropped, can cause sparks which can be disastrous in an explosive environment. Non-Sparking Tools eliminate this hazard, however, standards regarding their application are incomplete, inconsistent and in some cases inaccurate.We feel prevention is one of the most effective means of ensuring safety. If we can prevent an accident and save someoneʼs life and business, if we can implement standards and codes to educate and inform before an accident happens, then we should make the necessary standards and codes to solve the problem.The standards and recommended practices developed by NFPA are designed to improve overall safety and protection of property and personnel. Implementing a Non-Sparking Tools requirement wherever an ignition source is a concern would reduce the risk of fire and explosion where hazardous conditions are present.Non-Sparking Tools are recommended by Safety Engineers and Insurance Companies and meet OSHA and EPA requirements where hazardous, combustible or flammable gases, liquids, dusts and residues are present. Non-Sparking Tools should be used when storing, processing, handling hazardous materials as well as maintenance and repair operations within hazardous environments. All it takes is just one spark to cause an explosion.Committee Meeting Action: Reject Committee Statement: No symbol was submitted. The subject matter is beyond the scope of the document.Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-2 Log# CP11 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Title) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Change the title of NFPA 170 to “Standard for Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols”.

Revise scope and pupose as follows:1.1 Scope.This standard presents symbols used for fire safety, emergency and associated hazards.1.2 Purpose.The purpose of this standard is to standardize the symbols used in representing fire safety, emergency and associated hazards. Substantiation: NFPA 170 is an appropriate document to maintain these symbols.Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-3 Log# 9 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept in Principle(2.3.1) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Geoffrey Peckham , Hazard CommunicationsRecommendation: Replace “1991” with “2002” in the reference for the ANSI Z535.1 Safety Color Code.Substantiation: 2.3.1 references the 1991 edition of the ANSI Z535.1 Safety Color Code. This standard, which I have chaired since 1992, was revised in 1998 and again in 2002. This next edition of NFPA 170 should reference the 2002 revision. Note that the next revision of the Z535.1 standard is slated for 2006.Committee Meeting Action: Accept in Principle Refer also to ANSI Safety Color Chart in Section 4.1.3.3.Committee Statement: The color chart provides examples for each color.Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-4 Log# 4 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(4.2) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Geoffrey Peckham , Hazard Communications / Rep. ANSI 2535 US Tag to ISO/TC 145Recommendation: Replace the figures that include the referent “Emergency Exit” with the international ISO accepted symbol for this referent included in ISO 7010 as symbols E001 and E002.

170-3

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 Substantiation: The ISO “Emergency Exit” symbol was developed years ago in Japan and forms the basis for the international acceptance of a single symbol for this referent. Though they are similar in many respects, the symbol is highly refined and much better drawn than the figure shown in NFPA 170. I have included EPS files for these symbols on a CD that accompanies my proposals so that you may have the highest reproduction quality when printing this symbol. The ONLY color allowed for this symbol is solid green with a white door opening. Green is the proper color, according to ISO 3864, for “Safe Condition” signs - and this referent falls into this category of symbols. As for its shape in Table 4.2, it should be shown in a square. In practice this symbol is incorporated into a vertical or horizontal rectangular sign that incorporates a directional arrow. For this reason, please consider adopting adding a chart for the use of arrows as described in another of my revision proposals. The word “EXIT” may also be added to the completed sign.Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-5 Log# 6 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept in Principle(4.2) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Geoffrey Peckham , Hazard Communications / Rep. ANSI 2535 US Tag to ISO/TC 145Recommendation: Add a section to Table 4.2 that explains the “Use of Arrows” to indicate the direction of travel on an egress route. See section 8.6 in ISO 3864 for an example of how this can be done. (See Table 4.2 on the following page. Substantiation: If NFPA 170 just illustrates an arrow symbol, sign manufacturers and those installing signs will not understand exactly how the arrows should be used. The “UP” arrow is used for moving “through” a door, not a “DOWN” arrow. In a stairwell, going “up” is indicated by an arrow that is pointed up at a 45 degree angle, and so on. I have even seen the “emergency exit” symbol on a sign with the man pointed in one direction and the arrow pointed in the other direction. Guidance is needed and examples of use for putting the components together should be given in this standard.Committee Meeting Action: Accept in Principle Accept the signage with description (eight positions) as submitted without the word “EXIT” and the man symbol in second line of Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 (Committee Action)

170-4

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 4.2 (Recommendation)

170-5

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 Add a new section to read as follows: 4.1.3.4* Symbols may be used in combination with other symbols either vertically or horizontally on the same sign or on separate signs adjacent to each other. A.4.1.3.4 List examples here.Committee Statement: To provide greater detail on the use of arrows and be more consistent with international symbols.Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-6 Log# CP4 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Table 4.2) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: On page 7:Change stair symbols to new flame on the right.Elevator Symbol - New “prohibition” sign, new flame on right, make square.On page 8:Replace Manually Activated Alarm with F005,Area of Refuge - new flame on right, wheel chair on left, vertical line stays.(See Table 4.2 on the following page)Substantiation: This change will make these symbols more onsistent with international symbology.Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCEComment on Affirmative SCHIFFER: All flames on Table 4.2 should be as used in initiating devices.

_______________________________________________________________170-7 Log# CP6 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Table 4.2) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Add a new symbol for Automatic External Defribrilator (AED) to Table 4.2.Characteristics: Square field, white background, black paddles, red heart, black/white bolt (white through the heart, black to paddle)Application: To identify the location of AEDʼsExample: Airports and other places of assembly.

Substantiation: Designates the location of AEDʼsCommittee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCEComment on Affirmative SCHIFFER: All flames on Table 4.2 should be as used in initiating devices.

_______________________________________________________________170-8 Log# 5 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept in Principle(4.2, 5.2) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Geoffrey Peckham , Hazard Communications / Rep. ANSI 2535 US Tag to ISO/TC 145Recommendation: Replace the symbol for “Arrow” with the international ISO accepted symbol for this referent included in ISO 7010 as symbols E003 and E004 and include examples of the use of directional arrows in Table 4.2 or in a new annex for directional way-guidance. Delete the “chevron” arrowheads that appear in the second “Emergency Exit” symbol in table 4.2. The ISO arrow should also replace the “directional arrow” symbols found Table 5.2 and the illustrations in the front of the standard.Substantiation: The arrows that appear in NFPA 170 to indicate direction are not the same and they should be. Some are close in shape to the arrow with a Belgian Head that is standardized in ISO 3864 and ISO 7010 and I propose that NFPA accept the ISO arrow as the standard graphical symbol for a directional arrow. I have included EPS files for these symbols on a CD that accompanies my proposals so that you may have the highest reproduction quality when printing this symbol. The color for the “emergency exit” directional arrow should ONLY be green on a white background or white on a green background. The ONLY color for the “fire equipment location” directional arrow should be white on a red background.Committee Meeting Action: Accept in Principle Delete chevrons in Table 4.2 on p.5, change arrows in Table 4.2 on p.6 to indicate ISO arrows. (See Table 4.2 on following pages.)Committee Statement: To better coordinate with international standards.Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-9 Log# 8 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept in Part(5.2) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Geoffrey Peckham , Hazard CommunicationsRecommendation: Replace and/or add the ISO 7010 fire safety symbols to this standard in section 5.2.Substantiation: The international ISO symbols have been tested for comprehension, are well recognized and the flames “determinative” gives the signs the universal understanding they need. EPS graphics of these better designed symbols are included on the CD.Committee Meeting Action: Accept in Part Add Symbols F001 and F002 to Table 4.2. (See Table 4.2 on the following pages).Committee Statement: The other symbols were not accepted as they are used for fire service only and the flame is not needed.Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE

170-6

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

170-6 (Log #CP4)

170-7

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

(170-8 (Log #8) Committee Action)

170-8

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

(170-8 (Log #5) Committee Action cont.)

(170-9 (Log #8) Committee Action)

170-9

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 _______________________________________________________________170-10 Log# CP5 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Table 5.2) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Add a new symbol to Table 5.2 to illustrate “No Firefighting”. Characteristics: Octagonal field, white background, black truck and red prohibition symbol. This will include the DOT Fire Station symbol with a “prohibition” symbol overlaid. Application: To be posted on, near or on the approach to buildings where firefighting is not to occur.Examples: Explosives bunkers, frangible buildings or contaminated buildings.

Substantiation: NFPA 5000 needs a symbol to meet the requirements of 7.4.1.3.5.3(F).Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-11 Log# CP9 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Table 5.2) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Add a new symbol for Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) to Table 5.2.Characteristics: Square field with white symbol on green backgroundApplication: To indicate the location of SCBA, breating air connections or re-fill location.Examples: For SCBA fill locations in high-rise buildings.

170-10

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 Substantiation: To indicate the location of SCBA or breathing air re-fill locations.Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-12 Log# 1 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept in Principle(5.7.1.1) ________________________________________________________________NOTE: This Proposal appeared as Comment 170-5 (Log # 3 ) which was held from the ROC on Proposal 170-19. Submitter : Vince Baclawski , , and Bill Hopple National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / Rep. NEMA/CAFAARecommendation: Change to “Accept in Principle”. Continue to “Accept” the committee recommendation(s) but delete item (6) Pull Station and its symbol from Section 5.7.1.1.Substantiation: We do not believe there is any reason to designate item (6) from the basic shape of the Manual Station shown in 5.7.1.1. We believe that “Pull Station” was added because members of the industry often refer to it this way. However, Chapter 2 of NFPA 72 continues to call it a “Manual Box”. If this symbol exists for some other reason, then why are there not symbols (and subscript) for other types of activated manual boxes? We will be submitting a change next cycle to change the title from “Manual Station” to “Manual Box” for consistency with NFPA 72. If this comment is considered new material, we will submit it during the next cycle.Committee Meeting Action: Accept in Principle Add to Manual Station-pull station: “Manual-Station - Pull Station / Fire Alarm Box “ in Table 6.7.1, include the change to Tables 7.3 and 4.2 (pages 8, 17 & 25).

170-11

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 Committee Statement: Language in more consistent with NFPA 72.Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-13 Log# CP1 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Table 6.3.6) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Add symbols for hazardous location diagrams as shown:

Substantiation: A uniform style for illustrating hazardous locations is needed. NFPA 70 “National Electric Code” and NFPA 497 “Recommended Practice for the Classification of Flammable Liquids, Gases, or Vapors and of Hazardous (Classified) Locations for Electrical Installations in Chemical Process Areas” have already coordinated use of these symbols for both documents.Committee Meeting Action: Accept Add three hatch notations in Table 6.3.6 to indicate Class 1 areas. Under description add “Hatch Patterns for Electrically Classified Locations”Committee Statement: Class should be noted when used.Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-14 Log# CP7 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Table 6.3.6) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Add a new symbol to Table 6.3.6 for an AED symbol for plans.

Substantiation: Designates the location of AEDʼs on plans. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE

_______________________________________________________________170-15 Log# CP2 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(6.6.7.1) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Change Title of Section 6.7.1 and Table 6.7.1 to read as follows:“Symbols for Signal Initiating Devices and Activation Switches” Substantiation: Better clarification of switch types and to conform to wording in NFPA 72. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-16 Log# CP3 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(6.6.7.1) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: For combination detectors, add the words “Combination Device” in the comments column.Substantiation: Clarifies the type of symbol.Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE

Table 6.3.6 Miscellaneous Features Hazardous Area Description

170-12

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 _______________________________________________________________170-17 Log# 2 FIS-AAA Final Action: Reject(Table 6.7.1) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Kirk Vandergrift , SimplexGrinnellRecommendation: Propose changing the symbol for the combination smoke/heat detector.

Substantiation: The existing symbol uses twice as much space and does not allow for any information to be given about the smoke detector.Committee Meeting Action: Reject Committee Statement: Reproduction and clarity of the symbol is in question on a drawing. Supplementary Indicators can be added as needed. Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE

170-13

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 _______________________________________________________________170-18 Log# CP8 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Table 6.8.3) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Add a longitudinal brace in Table 6.8.3 and indicate piping direction for both longitudinal and lateral brace. Delete the words “2-way” under lateral brace. Change 4-way brace by deleting lateral brace reference in description. Add comment to 4-way brace as follows: Only used to brace risers”.

Substantiation: Clarifies the application of seismic bracing.Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCEComment on Affirmative BROWN: The second “Lateral Brace” as shown in the proposed Table 6.8.3 should be corrected to read “Longitudinal Brace”. This will bring the symbol into agreement with the symbol as used in NFPA 13: Figures A.9.3.5.6(a), (b), (c) and (d).

Table 6.9.3 Symbols for Piping, Valves, Control Devices and Hangers.

170-14

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170 _______________________________________________________________170-19 Log# CP10 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(Chapter 8) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Technical Committee on Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols Recommendation: Add a new Chapter 8 Titled “Symbology for Emergency Management Mapping”, including all symbols from the Homeland Security Working Group. (See Tables 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5 on the following pages.Substantiation: These symbols were prepared by the Federal Graphic Data Committeeʼs Homeland Security Working Group in support of the preparation for, prevention of, protection against , response to and recovery from threats to the nationʼs population centers and critical infrastructure that are of a terrorist, criminal, accidental, or natural origin and related events. Use of different symbols for the same information slows and degrades communication, particularly when many organizations need to coordinate operations. This set of symbols was compiled to support homeland security applications with the intent of concentrating efforts on emergency response. Upon completion of the project, the Homeland Security Working Group intended to submit the symbols for formal adoption through an accredited standards organization. The Technical Committee on Fire Safety Symbols has agreed to adopt and maintain these symbols in NFPA 170 as a result of these efforts. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE _______________________________________________________________170-20 Log# 7 FIS-AAA Final Action: Accept(A.4.1.3.2.1) ________________________________________________________________Submitter : Geoffrey Peckham , Hazard Communications / Rep. ANSI 2535 US Tag to ISO/TC 145Recommendation: The prohibition symbol that is used in this standard in NOT the ISO proscribed shape for this sign. ISO 3864 gives a clear definition for the structure of this symbol, with the interior slash at 80% of the width of the circular bandʼs width, and the bandʼs width is 10% of the width of the overall circleʼs diameter (see ISO 3864, Fig. 1, section 7).Substantiation: One uniform shape should be used for the prohibition symbol. Thinner lines make visibility difficult and thicker lines obscure the symbol underneath. An EPS graphic of this symbol is included on the CD.Committee Meeting Action: Accept Add symbol as proposed.

���

φd�

���d�

φd

�������������������������������������������

�������������������������

���������������������������������������

�������������������������

���������������

�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����

���

�����

�����

����d�

Number Eligible to Vote: 12Ballot Results: Affirmative: 8 Ballot Not Returned: 4 DIMANNO, MAY, QUINN, VORCE

170-15

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

170-16

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

170-17

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-18

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-19

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-20

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-21

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-22

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-23

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-24

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-25

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.2 Operations Symbology Reference (continued)

170-26

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

170-27

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-28

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-29

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-30

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-31

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-32

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-33

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-34

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-35

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-36

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-37

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.3 Incidents Symbology Reference (continued)

170-38

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

170-39

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.4 Natural Events Symbology Reference (continued)

170-40

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.4 Natural Events Symbology Reference (continued)

170-41

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.4 Natural Events Symbology Reference (continued)

170-42

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.4 Natural Events Symbology Reference (continued)

170-43

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.4 Natural Events Symbology Reference (continued)

170-44

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

170-45

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-46

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-47

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-48

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-49

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-50

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-51

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-52

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-53

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-54

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-55

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-56

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)

170-57

Report on Proposals — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 170

Table 8.5 Infrastructures Symbology Reference (continued)