REPLY TO ESSENTIAL DETAILS SOUGHT · Page 4 of 4 REPLY TO ESSENTIAL DETAILS SOUGHT 1. Reply to 2nd...

of 4

REPLY TO ESSENTIAL DETAILS SOUGHT

1. Reply to 2nd EDS dated 03-03-2019 ( to Page 61)

2. Reply to 1st EDS dated 13-2-2019 (Page 62 to Page 63)

As there is no provision to upload the Reply to 2nd EDS raised, we have combined the 1st and 2nd EDS replies in a single document and uploading the same in the website.

of 3

List of Annexures

Annexure-1 CFE vide order no.48/PCB/C.Estt/RO-HYD-II/AEE-N/96-2999 dated 30-12-1996 1

Annexure-2 CFE for Product change vide Order No. 48/PCB/C.Estt/ROH-II/EE-N/145/99/958 dated 06-09-1999

6

Annexure-3 Consent for Operation was granted by SPCB vide Order No. APPCB/ HYD/JDM/ 410/HO/2001/A/90 dated 10-1-2002 9

Annexure-4 Consent for product expansion was issued by SPCB vide Order No. 48/CFE/APPCB/HO/ R00/CFE/2002-570 dated 24-06-2002

17

Annexure-5 Sale Deed 21

Annexure-6 Consent for Operation with Name Change issued by SPCB vide Order No. APPCB/HYD/JDM/ 410/HO/2006-2101 dated 06-01-2007

28

Annexure-7 Latest Consent for Operation issued by SPCB valid up to 31-07-2021 34

Annexure-8 SEAC Minutes 35

Annexure-9 Filled in Questionnaire submitted to the Sub-Committee 51

Page 4

ANNEXURE - 1

1 Page 5

ANNEXURE - 1

2 Page 6

ANNEXURE - 1

3 Page 7

ANNEXURE - 1

4 Page 8

ANNEXURE - 1

5 Page 9

ANNEXURE - 2

6 Page 10

ANNEXURE - 2

7 Page 11

ANNEXURE - 2

8 Page 12

ANNEXURE - 3

9 Page 13

ANNEXURE - 3

10 Page 14

ANNEXURE - 3

11 Page 15

ANNEXURE - 3

12 Page 16

ANNEXURE - 3

13 Page 17

ANNEXURE - 3

14 Page 18

ANNEXURE - 3

15 Page 19

ANNEXURE - 3

16 Page 20

ANNEUXRE - 4

17 Page 21

ANNEUXRE - 4

18 Page 22

ANNEUXRE - 4

19 Page 23

ANNEUXRE - 4

20 Page 24

ANNEXURE - 5

21 Page 25

ANNEXURE - 5

22 Page 26

ANNEXURE - 5

23 Page 27

ANNEXURE - 5

24 Page 28

ANNEXURE - 5

25 Page 29

ANNEXURE - 5

26 Page 30

ANNEXURE - 5

27 Page 31

ANNEXURE - 6

28 Page 32

ANNEXURE - 6

29 Page 33

ANNEXURE - 6

30 Page 34

ANNEXURE - 6

31 Page 35

ANNEXURE - 6

32 Page 36

ANNEXURE - 6

33 Page 37

ANNEXURE - 7

34 Page 38

MINUTES OF THE 41st MEETING OF STATE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE,

(SEAC), TELANGANA STATE HELD ON 03.04.2018, 11:00 A.M.

ANNEXURE - 8

35 Page 39

Minutes of the SEAC Meeting held on 03.04.2018

Agenda Item: 03

M/s. Neuland Laboratories Limited, Unit 3, Sy. No. 10, Plot No. 3-72, Gaddapotharam (V), Jinnaram (M), Sangareddy District - Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri Tapas Saha; and Ms. Navya of M/s.Pragathi Labs & Consultants, Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

The SEAC noted the G.O.Ms. No. 95, dt. 21.09.2007 of the EFS&T Dept., GoAP; G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt. 25.07.2013 of the EFS&T Dept., GoAP; G.O.Ms. No. 120, dt. 22.10.2013 of the I&C Dept., GoAP; The project is exempted from the process of Public Hearing as the industry is located in a Notified Industrial Area existing prior to 2006, as per OM dt. 10.12.2014 of the MoEF&CC, Gol.

The proponent submitted copy ofEC order dt. 30.06.2005 issued by the MoE&F, Gol, in favour of M/s. Sibra Pharmaceuticals Ltd., for manufacture of Bulk Drugs ie., 3-Nitro 4-Hydroxy Phenyl Arsenic Acid (420TPA) Sulphamethoxazole (60TPA) and Dimetridazole (120 TPA). The SEAC noted that the proponent has not submitted Certified Compliance Rep011 issued by the Regional Office of the MoEF&CC, Gol, Chennai. The proponent requested to consider submission of Cet1ified Compliance Report at the time of appraisal and issue TORs.

The proponent informed that they have purchased the unit from M/s. Arch Pharma Labs Ltd.(Formerly M/s. Sibra Pharmaceuticals Ltd.). The proponent informed that CFO order dt.09.01.2017 was issued by the TSPCB in the name of M/s. Arch Pharma Labs Ltd., for manufacture of Bulk Drugs. Subsequently, M/s. Neuland Laboratories Ltd., has obtained Amended CFO order dt.06.02.20 18 in the name of M/s. Neuland Laboratories Ltd.

The proponent also requested to consider the baseline data being collected during March to May 2018 for preparation ofEIA report based on the Standard Tenns of Reference for Synthetic Organic Chemicals.

The proponent is directed to prepare EIA rep011 as per the Standard Terms of Reference (TORs) issued by the MoEF&CC, Goi available in their website viz.,www.moef.nic.in, under "5(f) Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations; synthetic rubbers; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates)" considering the baseline data collected during March to May 2018 and submit EIA report to the SEAC for appraisal.

Meanwhile, the SEAC decided to constitute a Sub-Committee with the following members to inspect the unit, verify records and submit a report on the following:

i) Distance of the industry from the nearest boundary of Patancheru and Bollaram Industrial Areas.

ii) Project modification iii) Project cost iv) ZLD System & its adequacy v) ETP modifications vi) Products : Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) vii) Verify Production details w.r.t. permitted for the past one year, as per ER-I. viii) Raw material : Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) ix) Solid waste : Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) x) Impact on sunoundings xi) Applicability of S.O. 804 (E) dt.14.03.2017 & S.0.1030 (E) dt. 08.03.2018 issued by the

MoE&F, Gol.

Members of Sub-Committee: 1 ,\ L , . v- \ .l ""''J it t\')( 'M f 2

' d. k_v~.,~ fl'(_ctQJ.

Agenda Item: 04

M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Sy. No. 120, Malkapur (V), Choutuppal (M), Bhon ir Division, Y adadri Bhon ir District - Environmental Clearance - Re .

The representative of the project proponent Sri Ashutosh Sinha; and Sri Sunil of M/s. SV Enviro Labs & Consultants, Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEd~~

5 CHAIRMAN, stAC

ANNEXURE - 8

36 Page 40

kecpl3

Highlight

kecpl3

Highlight


The total cost of the project is Rs. 85.0 Lakhs. The proponent is proposing budget for Environmental protection towards capital cost: Rs. 8.53 lakhs and recurring cost: Rs. 3.19 Lakhs/annum.

After detailed discussions and keeping inview of the Maner Reservoir existing adjacent to the mine lease area, the SEAC decided to constitute a Sub-Committee with the following members to inspect the site, verify records and submit report on present status of mine, impacts of the project on Maner Reservoir, nearest human habitation, other water bodies, surrounding environment, etc.,

Membt;fs of Sub-Committee:

1. v tV\~ L~ 2. lst..1Y()y" ()Jtt,l ~~

Agenda "BSR TECH PARK (Phase-H)" of M/s. BSR Builders LLP, Sy. No. 135, 138, 141 Item: 07 & 142, Nanakramguda (V), Serilingampalli (M), Rangareddy District -

Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri V. Srihari Rao; and Sri. L. Chandrasekhar Reddy of M/s. Vison Labs, attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

The SEAC noted that earlier the SEIAA issued EC vide order dt.19.03.2018 to "BSR Tech Park" of M/s. BSR Builders LLP, Sy. No. 135, 138, 141 & 142, Nanakramguda (V), Serilingampally (M), Rangareddy District in a total plot area of about 17,742.19 Sq.m. with total Built-up area is 1,46,929.70 Sq.m. for construction of IT Building (4C + G + 18 Floors+ Terrace).

The SEAC observed that the same proponent has submitted above proposal in the the same location for which the above EC was issued earlier. In this regard, the proponent informed that though the Sy.No. are same, the proposed project is a different project. It was informed that they proposed the projects in a phased manner ie., earlier project in Phase-I and present proposed project as BSR Tech Park (Phase-H).

It is noted that the details of the Land use are as following:

S.No. Details of Area Area in land use in Sq.m. percentage

1 Plinth Area 4005.40 37.7%

2 Road Area 3452.05 32.6%

3 Green Area 1978.47 18.7%

4 Open Area 1167.2 11.0%

Net Site Area 10603.12 100%

5 Road Widening 65.88

Total Area 10669.0

It was informed that the total built up area of the project is 1,28,283.6 Sq.m. The project consists of IT Office Building ( 4C + G + 19 Floors + Terrace).

It is also noted that Parking area to be provided is 36,145.47 Sq.m., to park about 1859 four wheelers and 826 two wheelers. It was informed that D.G. Sets of capacity 6 x 2000 kVA will be provided for emergency power supply.

It was informed that the source of fresh water is HMWS&SB. The total water requirement during occupational stage is 578.6 KLD. Out of that, fresh water requirement is 450.4 KLD (Domestic-298 KLD & HVAC - 152.4 KLD) & recycled treated waste water is 128.2 KLD. Quantity of sewage generated is 366.6 KLD. It is proposed to treat the sewage in a STP of capacity 440.0 KLD. The treated waste water will be used for: flushing the toilets, HV AC, DG cooling and development of greenery.

The Garbage (2428.65 kg/day) generated will be sent to Municipal Solid Waste disposal site; STP sludge (20 kg/day) will be used as manure; used oil and used batteries will be sent to Authorized Recyclers. E-waste will be disposed to the recyclers/dismantlers authorized by the TSPCB as per

the E-waste Rules. d Ci.eil---f.-8 CHAIRMAN, SEAC

ANNEXURE - 8

37 Page 41

kecpl3

Highlight


Solid Waste generation and mode of Treatment I Disposal (after expansion) are:

s. Description Quantity Mode of Disposal

No. I Organic residue from Process I.25 TPD

Sent to SPCB Authorized Cement Distillation Bottom Residue

2 (I% of spent solvents)

0.04 TPD industries (or) to TSDF for

3 Spent carbon O.OI TPD Incineration

Sent to TSDF for Landfill (or) 4 ETP Sludge 0.05 TPD Incineration (or) to SPCB Authorized

Cement industries

5 Misc. Waste

L.S. (spill control waste) TSDF

6 Rejects L.S.

100 Nos./ Sent to SPCB authorized Biomedical

7 BioMedical Waste month

waste incinerator

s. Description Quantity Mode of Disposal

No. 8 Boiler Ash 8TPD Sent to Brick Manufacturers

a) Detoxified Container I Liners drums, IOO Nos./ Disposed to SPCB Authorized 9 HDPE Carboys, Fiber Drums, month agencies

b) PP Bags 50 Kg/month after complete detoxification

10 Spent solvents

4.4 KLD Recovered within the premises (4 KLD + 0.4 KLD water) Recovered Solvents from Spent

II solvents 3.4 KLD Reuse or sold to Recyclers (85% recovery from spent solvents)

12 Spent Mixed solvents

0.6 KLD Sent to SPCB

(unrecovered solvents) Authorized agencies Sent to SPCB

13 Waste oils & Grease 1 KLiannum Authorized agencies for reprocessing

14 Used Lead acid Batteries I 0 Nos. I annum Sent to suppliers on

buy-back basis.

15 E- waste L.S. Authorized re-processor (or)

TSDF

16 Waste papers & other types of packing

L.S. Sold to scrap vendors scrap

17 Canteen waste L.S. Composted on site and reused

for green belt

Total cost of the project after proposed expansion is Rs. 5.49 Crores. The proponent is proposing budget for Environmental protection towards capital cost: Rs. 70.0 lakhs and recurring cost: Rs. 90.0 Lakhs/annum.

The SEAC examined the contents of the EIA Report and noted that the sub-committee has not yet submitted the report.

After detailed discussions, the SEAC deferred the project for consideration after submission of report by the Sub-Committee.

Agenda Item: 22

M/s. Deepak Nitrate Ltd., Hyderabad Specialities Division, Unit- I, Plot No. 90 F, Phase -1, IDA, Jeedimetla, Quthubullapur (M), Medchal - Malkajgiri District -Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri Prabhudeva; and Sri Tirumalesh of M/s. KKB Envirocare Consultants Pvt. Ltd., attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

33

u,~ CHAIRMAN$c

ANNEXURE - 8

38 Page 42


The SEAC noted that the existing industry is permitted to manufacture Diamino Stilbene DiSulphonic Acid (DASDA) which is a Dye intermediate. But, the G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt. 25.07.2013 is applicable only for Expansion of existing Bulk Drug & Bulk Drug intermediate manufacturing units subject to the installation of ZLD facilities by such units.

In this regard, the proponent submitted lr.dt.l6.12.2008 issued by the Deputy Director of IICT furnishing report on "Comprehensive studies on the applications of stilbene derivatives with special referene to 4,4-diaminostilbene 2,2-disulfonic acid (DASDA)". It was requested to issue TORs for the project.

The SEAC examined the documents submitted by the proponent and observed that the existing permitted product may also be used as a Bulk Drug Intermediate. The SEAC noted that as the G.O.Ms.No.64, dt.25.07.2013 is applicable to the project, the project may be considered.

The SEAC noted the G.O.Ms. No. 95, dt. 21.09.2007 of the EFS&T Dept., GoAP; G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt. 25.07.2013 of the EFS&T Dept., GoAP; G.O.Ms. No. 120, dt. 22.10.2013 of the I&C Dept., GoAP; and G.O.Ms. No. 80, dt. 27.10.2015 of the I&C Dept. The project is exempted from the process of Public Hearing as the industry is located in a Notified Industrial Area existing prior to 2006, as per OM dt. 10.12.2014 ofthe MoEF&CC, Gol.

After detailed discussions, the proponent is directed to prepare EIA report as per the Standard Terms of Reference (TORs) issued by the MoEF&CC, Gol available in their website viz.,www.moefnic.in, under "5(f) Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations; synthetic rubbers; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates)" and submit EIA report to the SEAC for appraisal.

Meanwhile, the SEAC decided to constitute a sub-committee with the following members to inspect the unit, verify records and submit a report on the following:


ii) Project modification iii) Project cost iv) ZLD System & its adequacy v) ETP modifications vi) Products : Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) vii) Verify Production details w.r.t. permitted for the past one year viii) Raw material : Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) ix) Solid waste: Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) x) Impact on surroundings xi) Justification of project w.r.t. G.O.Ms. No. 95, dt. 21.09.2007 and G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt.

25.07.2013. xii) Applicability of S.0.804 (E), dt.14.03.2017 issued by the MoEF&CC, Gol.

Members of Sub-<:;:ommittee: 1. la.dl, a. l' vt.ti,\1.~ ~ ,y~j Ctt,e...l_a..)(~ t 2· l<:..vVcl\ t'\11\ l.ua 1 . J

Agenda Item: 23

M/s. Deepak Nitrate Ltd., Hyderabad Specialities Division, Unit- II, Plot No. 70 A & B, Phase - I, IDA, Jeedimetla, Quthubullapur (M), Medchal - Malkajgiri District - Environmental Clearance - Reg.


The SEAC noted that the existing industry is permitted to manufacture Di-Nitro Stilbene DiSulphonic Acid (DNSDA) which is a Dye intermediate. But, the G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt. 25.07.2013 is applicable only for Expansion of existing Bulk Drug & Bulk Drug intermediate manufacturing units subject to the installation of ZLD facilities by such units.

34

tl.~a.__u41_ CHAIRMAN, sEAC

ANNEXURE - 8

39 Page 43


In this regard, the proponent submitted lr.dt.l6.12.2008 issued by the Deputy Director of IICT furnishing report on "Comprehensive studies on the applications of stilbene derivatives with special referene to 4,4-diaminostilbene 2,2-disulfonic acid (DASDA)". It was requested to issue TORs for the project.


The SEAC noted the G.O.Ms. No. 95, dt. 21.09.2007 ofthe EFS&T Dept., GoAP; G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt. 25.07.2013 of the EFS&T Dept., GoAP; G.O.Ms. No. 120, dt. 22.10.2013 of the I&C Dept., GoAP; and G.O.Ms. No. 80, dt. 27.10.2015 of the I&C Dept. The project is exempted from the process of Public Hearing as the industry is located in a Notified Industrial Area existing prior to 2006, as per OM dt. 10.12.2014 ofthe MoEF&CC, Goi.

After detailed discussions, the proponent is directed to prepare EIA report as per the Standard Tetms of Reference (TORs) issued by the MoEF&CC, Goi available in their website viz.,www.moef.nic.in, under "5(f) Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations; synthetic rubbers; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates)" and submit EIA report to the SEAC for appraisal.



ii) Project modification iii) Project cost iv) ZLD System & its adequacy v) ETP modifications vi) Products : Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) vii) Verify Production details w.r.t. permitted for the past one year viii) Raw material: Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) ix) Solid waste: Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) x) Impact on surroundings xi) Justification of project w.r.t. G.O.Ms. No. 95, dt. 21.09.2007 and G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt.

25.07.2013. xii) Applicability ofS.0.804 (E), dt.l4.03.2017 issued by the MoEF&CC, Goi.

Members of Sub-Committee: 1. ll.. ~~~ ~ t .;.~Vl ~ 2 · iJ.. .. k. yi.v\ '1 " ll:~..o ?Jj Agenda Item: 24

M/s. Deepak Nitrate Ltd., Hyderabad Specialities Division, Unit- III, Plot No. 22, IDA, Jeedimetla, Quthubullapur (M), Medchal - Malkajgiri District -Environmental Clearance - Reg.


The SEAC noted that the existing industry is permitted to manufacture Diamino Stilbene DiSulphonic Acid (DASDA) which is a Dye intermediate. But, the G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt. 25.07.2013 is applicable only for Expansion of existing Bulk Drug & Bulk Drug intermediate manufacturing units subject to the installation of ZLD facilities by such units.

In this regard, the proponent submitted lr.dt.16.12.2008 issued by the Deputy Director of IICT furnishing report on "Comprehensive studies on the applications of stilbene derivatives with special referene to 4,4-diaminostilbene 2,2-disulfonic acid (DASDA)". It was requested to issue TORs for the project.

35 vt. ~~J-1--

CHAIRMAN, me

ANNEXURE - 8

40 Page 44



The SEAC noted the G.O.Ms. No. 95, dt. 21.09.2007 ofthe EFS&T Dept., GoAP; G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt. 25.07.2013 of the EFS&T Dept., GoAP; G.O.Ms. No. 120, dt. 22.10.2013 of the I&C Dept., GoAP; and G.O.Ms. No. 80, dt. 27.10.2015 of the I&C Dept. The project is exempted from the process of Public Hearing as the industry is located in a Notified Industrial Area existing prior to 2006, as per OM dt. 10.12.2014 of the MoEF&CC, Goi.

After detailed discussions, the proponent is directed to prepare EIA report as per the Standard Terms of Reference (TORs) issued by the MoEF&CC, Gol available in their website viz.,www.moef.nic.in, under "5(f) Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations; synthetic rubbers; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates)" and submit EIA report to the SEAC for appraisal.



ii) Project modification iii) Project cost iv) ZLD System & its adequacy v) ETP modifications vi) Products : Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) vii) Verify Production details w.r.t. permitted for the past one year viii) Raw material: Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) ix) Solid waste: Comparison of existing and proposed (which are going for expansion) x) Impact on surroundings xi) Justification of project w.r.t. G.O.Ms. No. 95, dt. 21.09.2007 and G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt.

25.07.2013. xii) Applicability of S.0.804 (E), dt.14.03.2017 issued by the MoEF&CC, Gol.

Agenda Item: 25

11.00 Ha. Building Stone & Road Metal Mine of Sri V. Ajay Kumar, Sy. No. 17, Katakshapur (V), Athmakur (M), Warangal (R) District - Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri V. Sujit; Sri Vishnu Sharma of M/s. Sri Sai Manasa Nature Tech Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

It is noted that the mine lease area is 11.00 Ha. which is less than 25.0 Ha. The project is considered under B2 Category as per the guidelines of the MoEF &CC, Go I. The proponent submitted application along with Approved Mining Plan & EMP Report.

The proponent submitted a copy ofNotice dt. 15.11.2016 of the DDMG, Warangal granting quarry lease (in principle) in favour of the proponent for a period of 15 years. It may be noted that the Mine Lease is granted after 09.09.2013.

The Proponent also submitted a copy of lr.dt.22.03.2018 of ADMG, Warangal (Rural), informing that there is one quarry lease of Sri V. Rama Rao (4.0 Ha.) existing within 500m from the periphery of the proposed mine lease area.

The nearest village to the proposed site is Neredupalli (V) which exists at a distance of 1.32 km; nearest water body is Sali Vagu which exists at a distance of 2.70 krns and nearest RF exists at a distance of0.8 km from the boundary ofthe site.

36 -&/.~lf!L

CHAIRMAN, SJilc

ANNEXURE - 8

41 Page 45

MINUTES OF THE 40th MEETING OF STATE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE,

(SEAC), TELANGANA STATE HELD ON 29.03.2018, 11:00 A.M.

ANNEXURE - 8

42 Page 46


Agenda Item: 01

11.73 Ha. Colour Granite Mine of M/s. Anjali Puthra Granite, Sy. No. 990, Challur (V), Veenavanka (M), Karimnagar District - Environmental Clearance -Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri Jakkula Jagan; and Sri G.V. Reddy of M/s. Team labs and Consultants, Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

It is noted that the mine lease area is 11.73 Ha. which is less than 25.0 Ha. The project is considered under B2 Category as per the guidelines of the MoEF&CC, Gol. The proponent submitted application along with Approved Mining Plan & EMP Report.

The proponent submitted a copy ofNotice dt. 02.02.2018 ofthe DMG, Hyderabad granting quarry lease (in principle) in favour of the proponent for a period of 20 years. It may be noted that the Mine Lease is granted after 09.09.2013.

The Proponent also submitted a copy of lr.dt.l6.03.2018 of ADMG, Karimnagar informing that there are no existing quarry leases within 500m from the edge of the proposed mine.

It was reported that the nearest village to the proposed site is Challur (V) which is existing at a distance of0.6 km and Kakatiya Canla exists at a distance of 1.7 km from the boundary ofthe site.

But, during presentation it is observed that a Hamlet (BC Colony) of Challur (V) is adjacent to Mine Lease area. In this regard, the Project Proponent informed that they are leaving 45m buffer within the Mine Lease area towards the Hamlet. The Proponent also submitted a copy of NOC dt.31.03 .2018 issued by the Gram Panchayat, Challur (V), Veenavanka (M), Karimnagar District expressing their "No Objection" for 12.0 Ha. Granite Quarry by M/s. Anjali Putra Granites.

It is proposed to mine 76,019 m3/annum of Colour Granite and the life of mine is reported as 10 years.

The opencast semi-mechanized method is adopted for quarrying to cut the mineral into blocks.

The proponent is proposing the following measures towards control of Air Pollution:

a. Regular spraying of water by water sprinkling system on haul roads and retaining wall within the premises.

b. Water sprinkling on blocks before dressing. c. Drilling with wet gunny bags on drilling surface. d. Timely maintenance of vehicles to minimize air pollution due to movement of vehicles. e. Dust masks for employees. f. Covering the Granite carrying vehicles with tarpaulin covers. g. Plantation of trees along the roads and OB dump to reduce the impact of dust in the nearby

villages. Fertile soil will be purchased locally to spread on dump for plantation.

The source of water requirement for the proposed project is from nearby village by tankers. Total water requirement is 12.8 KLD. Out of that, 7.0 KLD is used for Wet drilling operation, 3.5 KLD for Dust Suppression, 1.9 KLD for Domestic Purpose, 0.4 KLD is used for development of greenbelt. Wastewater generated from the domestic section is to be disposed into septic tank followed by soak pit.

The proponent is planning to dump OB within their Mine Lease Area. The proponent is proposing retaining wall around the dump on dip side to aiTest the loose material. They are proposing local species of plants for plantation along the Roads & OB dump. The project proponent is proposing garland drain and siltation pond to arrest siltation. The proponent is proposing plantation of Gaanuga, Neem, Velaga, etc.,

The total cost of the project is Rs. 1.0 Crore. The proponent is proposing budget for Environmental protection towards capital cost: Rs. 12.2 lakhs and recurring cost: Rs. 6.21 Lakhs/annum.

ei ilfl;} 4 CHAIRMAN, SEAC

ANNEXURE - 8

43 Page 47

kecpl3

Highlight


After detailed discussions and keeping in view of the existence of Hamlet adjacent to mine lease area, the SEAC decided to constitute a Sub-Committee with the following members to inspect the site and submit repm1 on present status of the project, impacts of proposed project on nearest human habitation ie., Hamlet, water body, surrounding environment, etc.,

Members of Sub-Committee: 1. ~d fli.. N Mt_ .. 2. v\"'<1 ~· Agenda Item: 02

"Commercial Office Building" of Sri Ponguleti Prasada Reddy & Others, Sy. No. 322 Part & 323 Part, Puppalguda (V), Gandipet (M), Rangareddy District -Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri P. Srujan Sen; and Sri G.V. Reddy of M/s. Team Labs & Consultants, Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

The project is proposed within 10 km radius of Himayat Sagar and Osman Sagar Lakes. But, Puppalguda (V) is not included in the list of 84 villages in the 1 Okm catchment of above lakes as mentioned in the G.O.Ms. No: 111, MA, dt. 08.03.1996.


S.No. Details of land use Area in Sq.m. Area in% 1 Ground Coverage Area 4546.3 47.27%

2 Road Area 1695.9 17.63%

3 Green Area 961.8 10%

4 Open Area 2413.7 25.10%

Net Site Area 9617.7 100%

5 Road widening 1505.4

Total Site Area 11123.2

It was informed that the total built up area of the project is 1,23,660.6 Sq.m. The project consists of Single Block with 4 Cellars + 4 Stilts + 15 Upper Floors.

It is also noted that Parking area to be provided is 46,055.4 Sq.m., to park about 1632 four wheelers and 412 two wheelers. It was informed that D.G. Sets of capacity 2 x 2000 kVA will be provided for emergency power supply.

It was informed that the source of fresh water is HMWS&SB. The total water requirement during occupational stage is 346.5 KLD. Out of that, fresh water requirement is 192.5 KLD & recycled treated waste water is 154.0 KLD. Quantity of sewage generated is 277.2 KLD. It is proposed to treat the sewage in a STP of capacity 3 50 KLD. The treated waste water will be used for: flushing the toilets, HVAC and development of greenery.

The Garbage (2310 kg/day) generated will be sent to Municipal Solid Waste disposal site; STP sludge (18.0 kg/day) will be used as manure; used oil and used batteries will be sent to Authorized Recyclers. E-waste will be disposed to the recyclers/dismantlers authorized by the TSPCB as per the E-waste Rules.

The total cost of the project is Rs. 198.0 Crores. The proponent is proposing budget for Environmental protection towards capital cost: Rs. 217.51 lakhs during construction phase and Rs. 13.38 lakhs during occupation phase, recurring cost: Rs. 29.72 lakhs/annum during construction phase and Rs. 73.17 lakhs/annum during occupation phase.

After detailed discussions, the SEAC recommended for issue of EC.

el.LJ~ 5 CHAIRMAN, SEAC

ANNEXURE - 8

44 Page 48

kecpl3

Highlight


Solid Waste generation and mode of Treatment/Disposal (after expansion):

S.No Description Quantity Mode of Treatment/Disposal 1 Process residue 308.4 Kg/day 2 Solvent Residue 201.8 Kg/day

Sent to TDSF /Cement Plants for Co-incineration

3 Spent Carbon 69 Kg/day 4 Spent Mixed 0.84 KLD Sent to authorized recovery

Solvents units/Cement plants for co-incineration

5 Evaporation salts 802.6 Kg/day 6 ETP Sludge 62.5 Kg/day Sent to TSDF 7 Hyflow 25 Kg/day 8 Ash from Boiler 11.2TPD Sold to Brick manufactures 9 Spent Solvents 7.6KLD Recovered within plant premises

and reused 10 Detoxified 200 No.s/month

Sold to authorized vendors containers & liners

11 Waste oil 12 Lts/month Sent to Authorized Recyclers

12 Used batteries 8 No.s/Yr

Total cost of the project for proposed expansion is Rs. 2.5 Crores. The proponent is proposing budget for Environmental protection towards capital cost: Rs. 111.5 lakhs and recurring cost: Rs. 59.3 Lakhs/annum.

The SEAC examined the contents of the EIA Report and report of the sub-committee. After detailed discussions, the SEAC recommended the project for issue of EC.

Agenda Item: 14

Mls. Meka Laboratories, Sy. No. 10/C, IDA Gaddapotharam {V), Jinnaram (M), Sangareddy District- Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri M.S.R. Koteshwar Rao; and Sri G.V. Reddy of M/s. Team Labs & Consultants, Hyderabad attended before the SEAC.

After detailed discussions, the SEAC deferred the project for detailed examination.

Agenda Item: 15

M/s. Dashrath Prasad Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd., Sy. Nos. 274/1, 274/2, 276/A2, 277/A1, Tekulapalli (V), Penuballi (M), Khammam District - Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri Shaik Baji; and Sri G.V. Reddy ofM/s. Team Labs & Consultants, Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

The proponent prepared draft EIA report and undergone the process of public hearing on 22.02.2018 at project site. The proponent submitted the final EIA report to the SEAC.

The SEAC noted the contents of the final EIA Report and reviewed the issues emerged during the public hearing and commitments made by the proponent during public hearing.

The SEAC observed that total area of the plant is Ac. 12.6. Out of that the area earmarked greenbelt development is Ac. 4.2 (33.3%).

It is noted that the nearest habitation is Tekulapalli located at distance of 1.2 km and nearest water body is Nagarjuna sagar Main Branch Canal located at distance of 2.5 km from the unit and nearest RF is Kannegiri RF located at distance of 7.2 km from the unit.

The proposal is for expansion of the existing unit by inclusion of Single Super Phosphate (SSP) manufacturing facility in permitted/consented NPK Fertilizers (by mixing only).

et. W_;f--20 CHAIRMAN, SEAC

ANNEXURE - 8

45 Page 49

kecpl3

Highlight


List of Products

S.No Name of Product Consented Proposed Total after

(TPA) (TPA) Expansion (TP A) 1 NPK Fertilizers (By Mixing Only) 90000 --- 90000 2 Single Super Phosphate (SSP) --- 70000 70000

The details of Utilities (after expansion) i.e., after Inclusion of SSP are:

S.No. Utility Stack Height APCE 1 Existing: Hot Air 20m

Bag Filter Oven for NK unit

2 HF Scrubber 30m Bag Filter

3 DG Sets: Effective Existing: 320 KV A 5m stack Proposed: 250 KV A 4m height

The SEAC observed that the Process emissions contain hydrogen fluoride and carbon dioxide. Hydrogen Fluoride generated from mixing section will be scrubbed in 5 stage scrubbing system and scrubbed effluent is reused for dilution of sulphuric acid. The Carbondixide is let out into atmosphere following a standard operating procedure.

Water requirement (after expansion):

Purpose INPUT (KLD) OUTPUT (KLD)

Loss Effluent Consented

Process 2.5 2.5* Domestic 3 0.6 2.4 Total- I 5.5 3.1 2.4

Proposed Scrubber 30 30** Domestic 2 0.4 1.6 Water for gardening 5 5 Total- II 37 5.4 31.6 Grand Total (I + II) 42.5 8.5 34

Effluent Treatment & Disposal (after expansion):

Description Quantity (KLD} Mode of Treatment

Consented Proposed Total after Expansion

Scrubber Effluent 30 30 Reused for dilution of sulphuric acid

Domestic 2.4 1.6 4 Sent to Septic tank Wastewater followed by soak pit. Total 2.4 31.6 34

Solid Waste generation and mode of Treatment/Disposal (after expansion):

s. Description Total after Mode of Disposal No Expansion 1 Ash from Hor Air Oven 1.5 TPD Sold to Brick manufactures

from NPK Unit 2 Waste oil 280 LPA Sent to Authorized ..,

Used batteries 6 No.s/year Recyclers .)

4 Hydroflouro Silicic Acid 238 TPM Sold as by-product

21

J.LJJ:f__ CHAIRMAN, SEAC

ANNEXURE - 8

46 Page 50


Total cost of the project for proposed expansion i.e., inclusion of SSP is Rs. 5.5 Crores. The proponent is proposing budget for Environmental protection towards capital cost: Rs. 1. 78 crores and recurring cost: Rs. 0.265 croreslannum.

After detailed discussions, the SEAC decided to constitute a sub-committee with the following members to inspect the unit and submit repoti on present status of the project, existing environmental measures being practiced, adequacy of EMP with proposed measures, impacts of the proposed expansion on the surrounding environment etc.

Members of Sub-Committee: 1. {2_a_"d /_ ~ 1<....;. ~ ~ 't 2 1 ' · ~hlvtt ~~~v.

Agenda Item: 16

16.19 Ha. Rough Stone & Road Metal Quarry of Mls. Aryan Precisions Pvt. Ltd., Sy. No. 302, 303, 304 & 305, Ravalkole (V), Medchal (M), Medchal District - Environmental Clearance - Reg.

Earlier, the SEIAA referred the proposal to the SEAC for re-examination and justification as it was observed that the project cost is not commensurate with the mine lease area and rate of production.

Accordingly, the proponent vide lr. dt. 21.03.2018 submitted the following break up of project cost, as sought by the SEIAA.

Nature of Cost Element Value Capital Cost Infrastructure like office, sheds, etc., Rs. 4.0 lakhs

Establishment items Rs. 4.0 lakhs Machinery I Vehicles, Wagon Drill, Jack Rs. 45.0 lakhs Hammers, Compressors, etc., (Hired only)

Fixed Costs Salaries, other expenses, maintainence, Rs. 4.0 lakhs I departmental expenses month

Variable Costs Diesel, food, drilling rods, royalties Rs. 13.0 lakhs Total project cost : Rs. 70.0 lakhs

The SEAC examined the reply furnished by the proponent. The proponent informed that the project cost break up can commensurate the mine lease area, as the mining activity will done in a small portions over the years with hired Machinery.

After detailed discussions, the SEAC again recommended the project for issue of EC.

Agenda Item: 17

"Residential Construction Project" of Sri A.Vinaykumar Reddy, Sy. No. 431A, Bandlaguda (V), Uppal (M), Medchal District - Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri A. Vinaykumar Reddy; Sri S.N. Rao & Smt. M. Suma ofMis. Vitya Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

During presentation, it is observed that Sai Nagar Cheruvu I Bandlaguda Cheruvu exists adjacent to the project site. Further, a Bund exists in between the tank and proposed site. The proponent informed that proposed site is on downstream side of water body. Hence, the proponent proposed to leave 1Om buffer towards the tank.

22

da:__w1. CHAIRMAN, s?Ac

ANNEXURE - 8

47 Page 51

kecpl3

Highlight


It was informed that the source of fresh water is Mission Bhageeratha & Ground water. The total water requirement during occupational stage ie., during Spiritual retreats is 1020 KLD. Out of that, fresh water requirement is 637.5 KLD & recycled treated waste water is 382.5 KLD. Quantity of sewage generated is 886.5 KLD. The sewage generated is sent to the Septic tank followed by the soak pit. An Oxidation I Stabilization & Marturation pond will be provided with appropriate geotechnical lilning along with the septic tank. The septic over flow and grey water are connected to the Oxidation I Stabilization & Marturation pond for treatment. After treatment process, the waste water will be recycled for greenbelt development within their premises. During the rest of the days, the oxidation pond provided would be used for rain water harvesting.

The Garbage (1700 kg/day) generated will be sent to Municipal Solid Waste disposal site; STP sludge will be used as manure; used oil and used batteries will be sent to Authorized Recyclers.

The total cost of the project is Rs. 30.0 Crores. The proponent is proposing budget for Environmental protection towards capital cost: Rs. 60.0 lakhs and recmTing cost: Rs. 16.0 lakhs/annum.

After detailed discussions, the SEAC recommended for Issue of EC with following specific condition:

• The proponent shall not discharge any waste water into the water body existing within the site. The proponent shall take appropriate measures to safeguard the water body, regularly monitor the quality of the water body and submit reports to the TSPCB.

Agenda Item: 19

4.13 Ha. Laterite & Clay Mine of M/s. Venkateshwara Mines & Minerals, Sy. No. 58/2P & 59/2P, Mallampalli (V), Mulugu (M), Jayashankar Bhupalpally District - Transfer of Environmental Clearance from M/s. Kapil Mines & Minerals to M/s. V enkateshwara Mines and Minerals - Reg.

The SEAC noted that earlier, the SEIAA, AP (Combined State) issued EC order dt. 07.09.2012 to M/s. Kapil Mines & Minerals for mining 24,255 TPA of Laterite & 2,695 TPA of Clay.

Now, M/s. Venkateshwara Mines & Minerals infmmed that the Mine lease has been transferred from M/s. Kapil Mines & Minerals to M/s. Venkateshwara Mines & Minerals and submitted copy ofProcds. dt. 10.04.2014 of ADMG, Warangal transferring mining lease, along with Affidavit on Rs. 100/- Stamp paper dt. 21.03.2018 by M/s. Venkateshwara Mines & Minerals for Transfer of EC and Undertaking that they will comply all statutory stipulations as per EC and E(P) Act, 1986; NOC dt.21.03.2018 issued by M/s. Kapil Mines & Minerals for transfer of EC. Hence, it was requested to transfer the EC in the name ofM/s. Venkateshwara Mines & Minerals.

The SEAC observed that the EC was issued in the year 2012 and the mining lease was transferred in the year 2014. But, now the proponent is approaching SEIAA for transfer of EC after 4 years from transfer of lease.

Hence, the SEAC decided to ascertain whether any mining operations were carriedout in the mine after transfer of lease i.e., after 10.04.2014, as the mining lease and EC were not in the same name after transfer of lease.

After detailed discussions, the SEAC decided to constitute a Sub-Committee with the following members to inspect the site, verify records and submit report on present status of the mine, mining operations carriedout in the mine after transfer of lease i.e., after 10.04.2014, if any, if carriedout on what name, Environment protection measures already taken in the mine, etc.,

Members of Sub-Committee:

1. y.e H cd\~ aly · 2. !pa..""d "- R~~ cn..~a'~-1 A

25

ANNEXURE - 8

48 Page 52

kecpl3

Highlight

kecpl3

Highlight

kecpl3

Highlight


Agenda Item: 21

7.32 Ha. Quartz Mine of M/s. Vasundhara Minerals Private Limited, Sy. No. 119 & 120, Mothighanpur (V), Balanagar (M), Mahabubnagar District Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri V. Deepak Rao; and Sri Venkat Reddy of M/s. Pioneer Enviro Laboratories & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

It is noted that the mine lease area is 7.32 Ha. which is less than 25.0 Ha. The project is considered under B2 Category as per the guidelines of the MoEF&CC, Gol. The proponent submitted application along with Approved Mining Plan & EMP Repmi.

The proponent submitted a copy ofNotice dt.25.05.2017 ofthe DMG, Hyderabad granting quarry lease (in principle) in favour of the proponent for a period of20 years.

The proponent has not submitted any copy of letter issued by the Mining Department informing the details of quarry leases falling within 500m from the proposed mine lease area as Cluster. In this regard the proponent informed that the Mine Lease was initially granted in the year 1988 for a period of 10 years vide G.O.Ms. No.508 dt. 26.11.1988 issued by I&C (M-IV) Dept. Subsequently, during 10111 year after grant of mining lease and before expiry of the mining lease, the proponent approached the Mining Department for 1st renewal of mining lease and submitted application for a period of 10 years from date of expiry of lease i.e., from 01.05.1999. Subsequently, the proponent submitted Affidavit for 1st renewal of quarry lease for renewal of 20 years. But, there was no response from the Mining Department for grant of 1st renewal of mining lease. Hence, the proponent considered it as Deemed Approval of mining lease. Subsequently, it was decided by the Mining Depmiement vide Notice dt. 25.05.2017 to grant Quarry Lease (inprinciple) in favour of the proponent for a period of 20 years subject submission of Scrutinizing Quarry Plan, EC and CFE was granted. It was informed that the mine is operating from the year 2014.

The nearest habitation to the proposed site is Mothiganpur (V), which exists at a distance of 1.1 km and a Nala exists at a distance of about 0.4 km from the boundary of the site.

It is proposed to mine 1,18,671 TP A of Quartz and the life of mine is reported as 30 years.

The opencast semi-mechanized method with drilling & blasting operations for qumTying.

The proponent is proposing the following measures towards control of Air Pollution: a. Regular spraying of water by water sprinkling system on haul roads and retaining wall within

the premises. b. Water sprinkling on blocks before dressing. c. Drilling with wet gunny bags on drilling surface. d. Blasting with low explosives. e. Timely maintenance of vehicles to minimize air pollution due to movement of vehicles. f. Dust masks for employees. g. Covering the Mineral carrying vehicles with tarpaulin covers. h. Plantation of trees along the roads and OB dump to reduce the impact of dust in the nearby

villages. Fertile soil will be purchased locally to spread on dump for plantation.

The source of water requirement for the proposed project is from nearby village by tankers. Total water requirement is 10.6 KLD. Out of that, 3.9 KLD is used for Dust Suppression; 1.3 KLD for domestic purpose; and 5.4 KLD for development of greenbelt. Wastewater generated from the domestic section is to be disposed into septic tank followed by soak pit.

The proponent is planning to dump OB within their Mine Lease Area. The proponent is proposing retaining wall around the dump on dip side to arrest the loose material. They are proposing local species of plants for plantation along the Roads & OB dump. The project proponent is proposing garland drain and siltation pond to arrest siltation. The list of plants proposing for greenbelt are Neem, Juvvi, Raavi, Konda Juvvi, Nemalinara, Pogada & Ganuga.

The total cost of the project is Rs. 75.0 Lakhs. Environmental protection towards capital cost: Rs. Lakhs/annum.

27

The proponent is proposing budget for

13.1 lakhs and recurru.s~~-78

CHAIRMAN, sEAc

ANNEXURE - 8

49 Page 53

kecpl3

Highlight


After detailed discussions and keeping in view of the mining operations being carriedout by the proponent, the SEAC decided to constitute a Sub-Committee with the following members to inspect the site, verify records and submit report on:

• Present status of the mine, • Chronological events pertaining to mine, as per records, • Y earwise details of mining operations carried out by the proponent, as per records, • Applicability of S.0.804 (E) dt.l4.03.2017 & S.0.1030 (E) dt.08.03.2018 ofMoEF&CC,

Go I. • Impacts of the proposed mine on nearest human habitation, water body, surrounding

environment, etc.,

Members of Sub-Committee:

1. _..1) 0.. '\-) d u t.O-tt r @._Q_~ y· 2. tlv(' ..\.. ' ~. ,. \ Ct..,\\rf I

Agenda Item: 22

"Krushi Defence Colony-11" of M/s. Krushi Infra Projects India Pvt. Ltd., Sy. No. 275, 287, 288, 289 & 290, Patancheru (V & M), Sangareddy District -Environmental Clearance - Reg.

The representative of the project proponent Sri R.C.S. Reddy; and Sri Santhosh Kumar of M/s. Pioneer Enviro Laboratories & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad attended and made a presentation before the SEAC.

It was informed that industrial area of Patancheru is far away from the proposed site at a distance of more than 10 km.


S.No. Details of Area Area in land use in Sq.m. percentage

1 Plinth Area 11875.81 47.3%

2 Road Area 8173.15 32.55%

3 Green Area 2523.3 10.05%

4 Open Area 2535.2 10.10%

Net Area 25107.46 100%

5 Area affected by 1274.3 road widening Total Area 26381.76

It was informed that the total built up area of the project is 22,539.12 Sq.m. The project consists of 104 No. of Residential Villas (G + 2 Floors) and Amenities Block (G + 2 Floors).

It is also noted that each Villa will be provide with adequate Parking area to park one car & one two wheeler. It was informed that D.O. Sets of capacity 2 x 50 kVA will be provided for emergency power supply.

It was informed that the source of fresh water is HMWS&SB. The total water requirement during occupational stage is 77.0 KLD. Out of that, fresh water requirement is 52.0 KLD & recycled treated waste water is 25.0 KLD. Quantity of sewage generated is 67.0 KLD. It is proposed to treat the sewage in a STP of capacity 75.0 KLD. The treated waste water will be used for: flushing the toilets and development of greenery. It was informed that the excess treated waste water will be discharged into the public sewer lines.

The Garbage (0.31 MT/day) generated will be sent to Municipal Solid Waste disposal site; STP sludge (6.7 kg/day) will be used as manure; used oil and used batteries will be sent to Authorized

Recyclers. d. 28 CHAI~~C

ANNEXURE - 8

50 Page 54

kecpl3

Highlight

Proposal No.: SIA/TG/IND2/21772/2018 (41st

SEAC Agenda no. 23) Deepak Nitrite Ltd., HSD, Unit-II

1

Sub-Committee Report on M/s. Deepak Nitrite Limited,

Hyderabad Specialties Division, Unit-II Plot No. 70, Phase-I, IDA Jeedimetla, Quthubullapur (M), Medchal-Malkajgiri

District, Telangana State.

1. Distance of the industry from the nearest boundary of Patancheru and Bollaram Industrial Areas. Distance of the industry from the nearest boundary to IDA Patancheru is 19 km (W) and IDA Bollaram is 10 km (WNW). Google Map Showing distance from Project site (M/s. Deepak Nitrite Ltd., Hyderabad Specialties Division, Unit-II) is enclosed as Annexure-1.

2. Project Modification Industry is proposing to expand its Synthetic Organic Chemical manufacturing unit in the existing unit of area of 1.12 Ha. Plant Layout showing with facilities are enclosed as Annexure-2.

3. Project Cost Overall estimated project cost is Rs. 40.59 Crores including existing Rs. 22.2 Crores. Total capital cost allocated towards environmental pollution control measures is Rs. 4.31Crores including existing Rs. 3.01 crores. Recurring cost will be about Rs. 5.71 crores per annum. CA certificate enclosed as Annexure-3.

4. ZLD System & its adequacy Industry is proposing to treat the effluent in the upgraded ETP-ZLD. Treated water will be reused. Domestic wastewater will be sent to septic tank and the overflow to CETP of M/s. JETL to support the biological treatment at CETP. (OR) New STP along with Unit I & III Domestic waste water. Treated water will be reused for greenbelt in Unit-II.

5. ETP Modifications Currently industry is treating the effluent in MEE followed by fluidized bed recovery system. Industry is proposing to upgrade the existing ETP-ZLD with MEE & ATFD to meet the additional effluent of Unit I & III.

6. Products: Comparison of Existing and Proposed (which are going for expansion)

Comparison of Existing and Proposed products and its status

Sl. No. Product Name

Permitted Quantity

(TPA)

Additional Quantity

(TPA)

Proposed Quantity

(TPA)

Proposal Status

1. Di-Nitro Stilbene DiSulphonic Acid (DNSDA) 6239.9 7512.1 13752 Increase

7. Verify Production details w.r.t. permitted for the past one year, as per ER-I

Production is as per CFO within the permitted quantities.

ANNEXURE - 9

51 Page 55



2

. 8. Raw material: Comparison of Existing and Proposed (which are going for expansion)

List of Raw materials Permitted (Existing) and Proposed

PNTSA – Para Nitro Toluene Ortho Sulphonic Acid (C7H

7NO

5S)(35%)

(PNTSA 3500 + water 6500) Sodium Carbonat (Na

2CO

3) (9.7%) (Na

2CO

3 855.5 + Reuse water 7964.5)

Castic Lye (18..3%) (NaOH 646 + Reuse water 2884 Dil. Sulphuric Acid 55% from Unit 1 (H

2SO

4 800.25 + Water 654.75)

Catalyst Air (~20% Oxygen)

9. Solid waste: Comparison of Existing and Proposed (which are going for expansion)

Permitted Hazardous Waste Generation from the Existing Products

Sl. No. Source Stream Permitted

Quantity Disposal Option Hazardous waste with Disposal Option

1.

MEE salts a) Unrecovered

Sodium Sulphate b) Sodium Sulphate

salts

34.4 of Schedule-1

a) 2400 TPA

b) 5520 TPA

Shall be sent to TSDF, Dundigal, Rangareddy District

for secured land filling

2. ETP sludge 34.4 of Schedule-1 2 TPA

3. Spent Carbon 26.1 of Schedule-1 1.5 TPA

Shall be reused as fuel in Fluidized bed recovery system in controlled manner / shall be

sent to TSDF Dundigal, Rangareddy District for

incineration Hazardous waste with Recycling Option

4. DNSDA Mother liquor 26.1 of Schedule-1

20400 KL/Annum

Shall be reused within the process for recovery of

inorganic solids.

5. Scrubbing solution of Fluidized bed recovery systems

36.1 of Schedule-I

750 KL/Annum

Shall be recycled back to MEE for further recovery

6. Iron Sludge 26.1 of Schedule-I 6.23 TPD Shall be sent to authorized

cement industries

7. Spent Sulphuric Acid received from their sister concerns Unit-I & III

26.1 of Schedule-II 13800 TPA Shall be reused within the

process for further recovery

8. Used oil 5.1 of Schedule-I

1.5 KL/annum

Shall be sent to authorized re-processors / recyclers

ANNEXURE - 9

52 Page 56



3

Proposed Hazardous / Solid Waste Generation from the Proposed Products

Sl. No. Source Stream Permitted

Quantity Disposal Option Hazardous waste with Disposal Option

1 MEE salts Unrecovered Sodium Sulphate

34.4 of Schedule-1 2400 TPA

Shall be sent to TSDF, Dundigal, Rangareddy District

for secured land filling 2 a) ETP sludge b) MEE salts from Utilities effluent

34.4 of Schedule-1

4 TPA 360 TPA

3 Ash from FBRS -- 220 TPA

4 Spent Carbon from ETP 26.1 of Schedule-1 8 TPA

Shall be reused as fuel in Fluidized bed recovery system in controlled manner / Sent to

Auth. Cement industries / HWMP-TSDF for incineration /

GEIPL Hazardous waste with Recycling Option

5 Used / Waste mineral oil 5.1 of Schedule-I 3 KL/annum Shall be sent to authorized

re-processors / recyclers

6 Detoxified Containers 33.3 of Schedule-I

100 Nos./month

After complete detoxification, shall be disposed to outside

agencies

7 Used Lead acid Batteries

22 of Schedule-IV

10 Nos. / annum

Return to the dealers / manufactures on buy back

basis.

8 E-waste E-Waste rules L.S. HWMP-TSDF /

Authorized recycler Other waste

9 Boiler Ash -- 32 TPD Sold to Brick manufactures

10. Impact on Surroundings

Considering the Industry exists in the Notified Industrial area going for expansion and considering the proposed EMP for the expansion project, impact on surroundings are minimal.

• Effluent: Industry is proposing to treat the effluent in the upgraded ETP-ZLD. Treated water will be reused.

• Domestic wastewater will be sent to septic tank and the overflow to CETP of M/s. JETL to support the biological treatment at CETP.

• Solid Waste: Segregated based Nature Stored in Covered Platform with leachate collection pit Disposal to Authorized agencies for Reuse / alternate fuel / landfill etc.

• Boiler emissions: Stack height of 40m for effective dispersion of flue gases for proposed 20 TPH coal fired boiler. Existing 10 TPH coal fired boiler will be removed and retained the existing 8 TPH oil fired boiler as standby. .

• Fluidised Bed recovery system: Stack height of 30mis provided for effective dispersion of flue gases for the proposed 1.8 TPH crude Sodium Sulphate fired Fluidized Bed Recovery System (FBRS) for recovery of Sodium Sulphate. This is in addition to the existing 1.8 TPH crude Sodium Sulphate fired FBRS.

• Process emissions: Only CO2 (4593 kg/day) and unreacted air (19062 Kg/day) are the process emissions from the Manufacturing process which will be passed through scrubber, which is provided to production block to absorb the emissions.

• Noise: DG sets will be enclosed with acoustic enclosures.

ANNEXURE - 9

53 Page 57



4

• Greenbelt area: Total Greenbelt area is 0.263 Ha out of total area 1.12 Ha. 33% greenbelt including common greenbelt developed by IALA and maintained by Deepak Nitrite.

11. Justification of the project w.r.t. G.O.Ms No. 95, dt. 21.09.2007 and G.O.Ms. No. 64, dt.

25.07.2013 M/s. Deepak Nitrite Ltd., Hyderabad Specialities Division, Unit-II is located Phase-I, IDA Jeedimetla, Quthubullapur (M), Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana State.

Industry proposes to expand its Synthetic Organic Chemicals. Industry was established in the year 1996 in the name of M/s. Vasant Organics Pvt. Ltd., Unit-II granted CFE vide order no. 48/PCB/C.Estt/RO-HYD-II/AEE-N/96-2999 dated 30-12-1996 for manufacturing of Para Nitro Benzoilc Acid (PNBA) with a production capacity of 144 TPA. Later changed its name to M/s. Vasant Chemicals Ltd., Unit II and granted CFE for Product change vide Order No. 48/PCB/C.Estt/ROH-II/EE-N/145/99/958 dated 06-09-1999 to manufacture Dinitro Stilbene Disulphonic Acid (DNSDA) with production capacity 3442.5 TPA and its 2 by-products of Sodium Sulphate 3819.9 TPA and Sodium Nitrate 41.4 TPA and granted Consent for Operation by SPCB vide Order No. APPCB/HYD/JDM/ 410/HO/2001/A/90 dated 10-1-2002.

M/s Vasant Chemical Ltd., again granted CFE expansion for the same product DNSDA from 3442.5 TPA (11475 kg/day) to 6239.9 TPA (17333 kg/day) without increase in Pollution load by SPCB vide Order No. 48/CFE/APPCB/HO/R00/CFE/2002-570 dated 24-06-2002. In August 2006, M/s Deepak Nitrite Ltd., has taken over the assets of M/s Vasant Chemicals Ltd. and granted CFO by SPCB vide Order No. APPCB/HYD/JDM/410/HO/2006-2101 dated 06-01-2007 in the name of M/s Deepak Nitrite Limited (Hyderabad Specialties Division), Unit-II and regularly seeking renewal of CFO from SPCB and latest CFO is vide Order No.TSPCB/10079/CFO/RR-II/HO/2016 dated 27-06-2016 and is valid till 31-07-2021 Industry does not have Environmental Clearance (EC) as the establishment is prior to the EIA Notification dated 14-9-2006.

12. Applicability of S.O.804 (E)dt. 14.03.2017 issued by the MoE&F, GoI Not Applicable

ANNEXURE - 9

54 Page 58



5

Annexure - 1

Goo

gle

Map

Sho

win

g di

stan

ce fr

om P

roje

ct s

ite: 1

0 km

(WN

W) f

rom

Bol

lara

m a

nd 1

9 km

(W) f

rom

Pat

anch

eru

10

km

(W

NW

)

19

km

(W

)

ANNEXURE - 9

55 Page 59



6

Annexure – 2

Plant layout

Plant Layout

ANNEXURE - 9

56 Page 60



7

Annexure – 3

CA Certificate

ANNEXURE - 9

57 Page 61

kecpl3

Text Box

2)

REPLY TO ESSENTIAL DETAILS SOUGHT · Page 4 of 4 REPLY TO ESSENTIAL DETAILS SOUGHT 1. Reply to 2nd...

Documents

Transcript of REPLY TO ESSENTIAL DETAILS SOUGHT · Page 4 of 4 REPLY TO ESSENTIAL DETAILS SOUGHT 1. Reply to 2nd...