REFERENCES Anonymous. 2002. Oilseed plant going to Claxton in Georgia Faces. Univ. Georgia College...
1
REFERENCES Anonymous. 2002. Oilseed plant going to Claxton in Georgia Faces. Univ. Georgia College of Agric. & Env. Sci. at http://georgiafaces.caes.uga.edu Economic Research Service - U.S. Department of Agriculture (ERS-USDA). 2002. Title I, Commodity Programs in Farm Policy, the 2002 farm bill: provisions and economic implications. at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Features/farmbill/ National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). 2002. National Agricultural Statistics Service U.S. Dept. of Agri.. 2000 Annual summary. NASS-USDA, Washington, DC. Figure 1. Pioneer 45A71 (staked bed, left) and Flint (nonstaked bed, right) canola planted in Plains, GA. Soil Applied Residual Herbicide Affect on Conventional and Imidazolinone Resistant Canola in the Southeastern US Timothy Grey 1 , Paul Raymer 2 , and G. David Buntin 2 1 The University of Georgia, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, Georgia, 31793-0748, [email protected] , 2 1109 Experiment St. Griffin Georgia 30223 Imazapic rate ¼ X ½ X 1 X Figure 2 (Left). Imazapic carryover simulation to Pioneer 45A71 (left bed of each picture) and Flint (right bed of each picture) at ¼ x (top), ½ x (middle), and 1x rates (bottom). Note dose response for Flint from ¼x to ½x rates but no difference for Pioneer 45A71. Figure 3 (Top). Imazapic carryover simulation to Flint canola from ¼x application rate. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 D iclosu la m P 45A 71 Dic losula m Fli nt I m azap ic P 45A 71 I m azapic Flin t C hlorim u ron P 4 5A 71 C hlorim u ron F lin t Trifloxy sulf u ro n P 45 A 7 1 Trifloxysulfu ro n Flint 1/4 x 1/2 x 1 x % injury Herbicide/canola combination Herbicide rate Figure 5. ALS inhibitor injury on Pioneer 45A71 and Flint canola. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flum i oxazin P 45A 71 Flum ioxazi n F lin t Fom esafe n P4 5A 7 1 Fom esafen Flint S ulfentrazon e P 45A 71 S ulfentrazon e F lint 1/4 x 1/2 x 1 x % injury Herbicide/canola combination Herbicide rate Figure 4. PPO inhibitor injury on Pioneer 45A71 and Flint canola. INTRODUCTION Interest in canola quality oilseed rape, Brassica naupus L., in the southeastern US has recently increased (Anonymous 2002) . There are several potential markets for canola in this region including: 1) whole grain exports of non-genetically modified canola, 2) newly developed specialty oil lines, 3) improved commodity prices (ERS-USDA 2002) and 4) production uses for biodiesel. Agronomic production of a profitable canola crop in the southeastern U.S. will depend on reliable information about rotational restrictions to cotton, peanut, and other agronomic herbicides. Agronomic row crop production in Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and South Carolina represent 1,005,000 hectares of cotton, 323,300 hectares of corn, 329,820 hectares of peanut, 348,030 hectares of soybean, and 25,500 hectares of tobacco (NASS, 2002). Wheat, oats, and rye, planted in winter rotations with these crops represent 434,230 hectares (NASS, 2002). Canola integrated as part of a winter rotation, October planted and May harvested, could potentially increase farmer profits, as an alternative oil seed crop. Herbicides used in row crop production in the southeastern U.S. vary by crop. In the south, imazapic and diclosulam are applied to approximately 85% of the peanut hectares. Pyrithiobac is applied to greater than 30% of the cotton crop. Imazapic, diclosulam, and pyrithiobac mode of action is through acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibition. Other ALS herbicides used in these crops include chlorimuron and trifloxysulfuron. Herbicides having different modes of action that are used in the southeastern US in cotton and peanut include sulfentrazone, fomesafen, and flumioxazin. However, rotational data for these herbicides for canola have not been established in the southeastern U.S. One reason to evaluate canola for herbicide carryover in this region is the moderate temperature and moisture regimes that can perpetuate the degradation of pesticides. Clearfield canola cultivars have ALS resistance, specifically to imidazolinone herbicides. Clearfield-resistant canola was marketed commercially in Canada during 1998 and is now available for evaluation in the United States. The use of Clearfield canola could be very beneficial for canola growers in the southeastern U.S., allowing the use of imazamox herbicide that has selective control of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.), many other dicot weeds, and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) (Grey et al. 2003). Additionally, Clearfield canola potentially could be grown with reduced risk of injury, in rotation with cotton, peanuts, and other row crops that have had ALS mode of action herbicides (imazapic, diclosulam, pyrithiobac, etc.) applied for weed control. However, research for tolerance to these herbicide has not been established. MATERIALS & METHODS Experiments were conducted in Georgia during 2002-2003 at the Bledsoe Research Farm near Williamson and in 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 at the Southwest Georgia Branch Experiment Station located near Plains in separate areas of the same field. Soils were a Cecil sandy clay loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic, Typic Hapludult) at Williamson and a Faceville sandy loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic, Typic Kandiudults) at Plains. Organic matter ranged from 1.0 to 2.0% with pH from 6.0 to 6.5 at both locations. In the fall of each season, seedbeds were conventionally tilled using a moldboard plow and smoothing with a rotary tiller. Canola was seeded with a Great Plains drill with a 19 cm row width on October 11, 2002, November 11, 2003, and October 18, 2004 at a rate of 28 seed per m of row. Each experiment was arranged as a split plot with treatments replicated four times. Plot size was 3.66 m wide by 7.6 m long (Figure 1). Herbicides were PRE applied with a CO 2 -pressurized backpack sprayer calibrated to deliver 187 L/ha at 210 kPa. Emergence dates for all trials was approximately one week after planting. Split plots were seeded on 1.83 m bed with imidazolinone-tolerant ‘Pioneer 45A71’ and on the other 1.83 m bed to the to conventional canola ‘Flint’. The intent was to determine tolerance to ALS herbicides. Screening of herbicide tolerance to two classes of herbicides was investigated. Modes of action included acetolactate synthase inhibitors (ALS) and protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors (PPO). Five ALS herbicides and three PPO herbicides were evaluated. Factors included cultivars (IMI-tolerant canola and traditional canola) and herbicide rate (1x, ½x, ¼x) that resulted in 25 treatments. Treatments included a nontreated check, the ALS herbicides diclosulam, imazapic, chloriuron, pyrithiobac and trifloxysulfuron, and the PPO herbicides flumioxazin, fomesafen, and sulfentrazone. (Table 1). Crop injury was visually estimated on a scale of 0 (no injury) to 100% (death). Crop injury ratings were taken at 140, 70, and 58 days after planting (DAP) for the 2002, 2003, and 2004 plantings, respectively. Canola stand counts were taken 58 DAP for the 2004 planting. Plots were harvested (2004 only) with conventional plot combine. Table 1.H erbicide treatm ents forcanola herbicide resistance study. Injury Stand counts Treatm ent Rate Pioneer45A 71 Flint Pioneer45A 71 Flint _ g ai/ha _ ____________ % _____________ ________ plants/m row _________ 1 N ontreated 0 0 0 26 32 2 D iclosulam 20 21 99 23 1 3 D iclosulam 41 43 100 17 0 4 D iclosulam 82 63 100 14 0 5 Imazapic 18 1 96 26 3 6 Imazapic 35 1 97 24 1 7 Imazapic 71 6 100 18 1 8 C hlorim uron 2 12 57 27 20 9 C hlorim uron 4 4 71 23 19 10 C hlorim uron 9 13 83 27 13 11 P yrithiobac 13 10 68 23 26 12 P yrithiobac 27 9 81 27 19 13 P yrithiobac 54 17 93 24 15 14 Trifloxysulfuron 5 8 68 22 21 15 Trifloxysulfuron 8 5 69 26 21 16 Trifloxysulfuron 13 15 81 28 16 17 Flumioxazin 26 79 79 12 9 18 Flumioxazin 53 88 91 8 5 19 Flumioxazin 108 98 98 1 3 20 Fom esafen 105 68 80 19 21 21 Fom esafen 210 82 87 10 8 22 Fom esafen 420 97 90 4 1 23 Sulfentrazone 105 84 85 13 14 24 Sulfentrazone 210 85 84 7 13 25 Sulfentrazone 280 93 89 7 12 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Pioneer 45A71 and Flint canola exhibited extensive injury and nearly complete stand failure (Table 1) and crop loss with the PPO herbicides flumioxazin, fomesafen, and sulfentrazone (Figure 4). This susceptibility resulted in in no or significantly reduced yields (data not shown). For the ALS herbicides imazapic, chlorimuron, pyrithiobac, and trifloxysulfuron, Pioneer 45A71 canola injury was 17% or less for all rates (Figure 5) and yields were not different from the nontreated control (Data not shown). Pioneer 45A71 exhibited excellent tolerance to imazapic at ¼, ½, and 1x rates (Figure 2). In contrast, Flint canola exhibited 57% injury or greater (Figures 3 & 5) and yield reductions for imazapic, chlorimuron, pyrithiobac, diclosulam, and trifloxysulfuron at all rates (Data not shown). Pioneer 45A71 exhibited dose response injury of 21, 43, and 63% for the ¼, ½, and 1x rates of diclosulam, respectively (Figure 5). Additionally, stand was reduced from 26 to 14 plants/m row for the nontreated check to diclosulam at 82 g/ha, respectively. This indicates that imi-resistant canola is not resistant to all ALS herbicides which should be considered when planning potential rotational options for canola.
description
Soil Applied Residual Herbicide Affect on Conventional and Imidazolinone Resistant Canola in the Southeastern US. Timothy Grey 1 , Paul Raymer 2 , and G. David Buntin 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of REFERENCES Anonymous. 2002. Oilseed plant going to Claxton in Georgia Faces. Univ. Georgia College...
REFERENCESAnonymous. 2002. Oilseed plant going to Claxton in Georgia Faces. Univ. Georgia College of Agric. & Env. Sci. at
http://georgiafaces.caes.uga.eduEconomic Research Service - U.S. Department of Agriculture (ERS-USDA). 2002. Title I, Commodity Programs in Farm Policy, the 2002 farm bill: provisions and economic implications. at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Features/farmbill/ National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). 2002. National Agricultural Statistics Service U.S. Dept. of Agri.. 2000 Annual summary. NASS-USDA, Washington, DC.
Figure 1. Pioneer 45A71 (staked bed, left) and Flint (nonstaked bed, right) canola planted in Plains, GA.
Soil Applied Residual Herbicide Affect on Conventional and Imidazolinone Resistant Canolain the Southeastern US
Timothy Grey1, Paul Raymer2, and G. David Buntin2
1The University of Georgia, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, Georgia, 31793-0748, [email protected], 21109 Experiment St. Griffin Georgia 30223
Imazapic rate
¼ X
½ X
1 X
Figure 2 (Left). Imazapic carryover simulation to Pioneer 45A71 (left bed of each picture) and Flint (right bed of each picture) at ¼ x (top), ½ x (middle), and 1x rates (bottom). Note dose response for Flint from ¼x to ½x rates but no difference for Pioneer 45A71.
Figure 3 (Top). Imazapic carryover simulation to Flint canola from ¼x application rate.
0102030405060708090
100
Dicl
osul
am P
45A7
1Di
clos
ulam
Flin
tIm
azap
ic P
45A7
1Im
azap
ic F
lint
Chlo
rimur
on P
45A7
1Ch
lorim
uron
Flin
t
Trifl
oxys
ulfu
ron
P45A
71
Trifl
oxys
ulfu
ron
Flin
t
1/4 x1/2 x1 x
% in
jury
Herbicide/canola combination
Herbicide rate
Figure 5. ALS inhibitor injury on Pioneer 45A71 and Flint canola.
0102030405060708090
100
Flum
ioxa
zin P
45A7
1Fl
umio
xazin
Flin
tFo
mes
afen
P45
A71
Fom
esaf
en F
lint
Sulfe
ntra
zone
P45
A71
Sulfe
ntra
zone
Flin
t
1/4 x1/2 x1 x
% in
jury
Herbicide/canola combination
Herbicide rate
Figure 4. PPO inhibitor injury on Pioneer 45A71 and Flint canola.
INTRODUCTIONInterest in canola quality oilseed rape, Brassica naupus L., in the southeastern US has recently
increased (Anonymous 2002) . There are several potential markets for canola in this region including: 1) whole grain exports of non-genetically modified canola, 2) newly developed specialty oil lines, 3) improved commodity prices (ERS-USDA 2002) and 4) production uses for biodiesel. Agronomic production of a profitable canola crop in the southeastern U.S. will depend on reliable information about rotational restrictions to cotton, peanut, and other agronomic herbicides. Agronomic row crop production in Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and South Carolina represent 1,005,000 hectares of cotton, 323,300 hectares of corn, 329,820 hectares of peanut, 348,030 hectares of soybean, and 25,500 hectares of tobacco (NASS, 2002). Wheat, oats, and rye, planted in winter rotations with these crops represent 434,230 hectares (NASS, 2002). Canola integrated as part of a winter rotation, October planted and May harvested, could potentially increase farmer profits, as an alternative oil seed crop.
Herbicides used in row crop production in the southeastern U.S. vary by crop. In the south, imazapic and diclosulam are applied to approximately 85% of the peanut hectares. Pyrithiobac is applied to greater than 30% of the cotton crop. Imazapic, diclosulam, and pyrithiobac mode of action is through acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibition. Other ALS herbicides used in these crops include chlorimuron and trifloxysulfuron. Herbicides having different modes of action that are used in the southeastern US in cotton and peanut include sulfentrazone, fomesafen, and flumioxazin. However, rotational data for these herbicides for canola have not been established in the southeastern U.S. One reason to evaluate canola for herbicide carryover in this region is the moderate temperature and moisture regimes that can perpetuate the degradation of pesticides.
Clearfield canola cultivars have ALS resistance, specifically to imidazolinone herbicides. Clearfield-resistant canola was marketed commercially in Canada during 1998 and is now available for evaluation in the United States. The use of Clearfield canola could be very beneficial for canola growers in the southeastern U.S., allowing the use of imazamox herbicide that has selective control of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.), many other dicot weeds, and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) (Grey et al. 2003). Additionally, Clearfield canola potentially could be grown with reduced risk of injury, in rotation with cotton, peanuts, and other row crops that have had ALS mode of action herbicides (imazapic, diclosulam, pyrithiobac, etc.) applied for weed control. However, research for tolerance to these herbicide has not been established.
MATERIALS & METHODSExperiments were conducted in Georgia during 2002-2003 at the Bledsoe Research Farm near
Williamson and in 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 at the Southwest Georgia Branch Experiment Station located near Plains in separate areas of the same field. Soils were a Cecil sandy clay loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic, Typic Hapludult) at Williamson and a Faceville sandy loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic, Typic Kandiudults) at Plains. Organic matter ranged from 1.0 to 2.0% with pH from 6.0 to 6.5 at both locations. In the fall of each season, seedbeds were conventionally tilled using a moldboard plow and smoothing with a rotary tiller. Canola was seeded with a Great Plains drill with a 19 cm row width on October 11, 2002, November 11, 2003, and October 18, 2004 at a rate of 28 seed per m of row. Each experiment was arranged as a split plot with treatments replicated four times. Plot size was 3.66 m wide by 7.6 m long (Figure 1). Herbicides were PRE applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer calibrated to deliver 187 L/ha at 210 kPa. Emergence dates for all trials was approximately one week after planting. Split plots were seeded on 1.83 m bed with imidazolinone-tolerant ‘Pioneer 45A71’ and on the other 1.83 m bed to the to conventional canola ‘Flint’. The intent was to determine tolerance to ALS herbicides.
Screening of herbicide tolerance to two classes of herbicides was investigated. Modes of action included acetolactate synthase inhibitors (ALS) and protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors (PPO). Five ALS herbicides and three PPO herbicides were evaluated. Factors included cultivars (IMI-tolerant canola and traditional canola) and herbicide rate (1x, ½x, ¼x) that resulted in 25 treatments. Treatments included a nontreated check, the ALS herbicides diclosulam, imazapic, chloriuron, pyrithiobac and trifloxysulfuron, and the PPO herbicides flumioxazin, fomesafen, and sulfentrazone. (Table 1).
Crop injury was visually estimated on a scale of 0 (no injury) to 100% (death). Crop injury ratings were taken at 140, 70, and 58 days after planting (DAP) for the 2002, 2003, and 2004 plantings, respectively. Canola stand counts were taken 58 DAP for the 2004 planting. Plots were harvested (2004 only) with conventional plot combine.
Table 1. Herbicide treatments for canola herbicide resistance study.
Injury
Stand counts Treatment Rate Pioneer 45A71 Flint Pioneer 45A71 Flint _g ai/ha_ ____________%_____________ ________plants/m row_________ 1 Nontreated 0 0 0 26 32
2 Diclosulam 20 21 99 23 1
3 Diclosulam 41 43 100 17 0
4 Diclosulam 82 63 100 14 0
5 Imazapic 18 1 96 26 3
6 Imazapic 35 1 97 24 1
7 Imazapic 71 6 100 18 1
8 Chlorimuron 2 12 57 27 20
9 Chlorimuron 4 4 71 23 19
10 Chlorimuron 9 13 83 27 13
11 Pyrithiobac 13 10 68 23 26
12 Pyrithiobac 27 9 81 27 19
13 Pyrithiobac 54 17 93 24 15
14 Trifloxysulfuron 5 8 68 22 21
15 Trifloxysulfuron 8 5 69 26 21
16 Trifloxysulfuron 13 15 81 28 16
17 Flumioxazin 26 79 79 12 9
18 Flumioxazin 53 88 91 8 5
19 Flumioxazin 108 98 98 1 3
20 Fomesafen 105 68 80 19 21
21 Fomesafen 210 82 87 10 8
22 Fomesafen 420 97 90 4 1
23 Sulfentrazone 105 84 85 13 14
24 Sulfentrazone 210 85 84 7 13
25 Sulfentrazone 280 93 89 7 12
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Pioneer 45A71 and Flint canola exhibited extensive injury and nearly complete stand failure (Table 1) and crop loss with the PPO herbicides flumioxazin, fomesafen, and sulfentrazone (Figure 4). This susceptibility resulted in in no or significantly reduced yields (data not shown). For the ALS herbicides imazapic, chlorimuron, pyrithiobac, and trifloxysulfuron, Pioneer 45A71 canola injury was 17% or less for all rates (Figure 5) and yields were not different from the nontreated control (Data not shown). Pioneer 45A71 exhibited excellent tolerance to imazapic at ¼, ½, and 1x rates (Figure 2). In contrast, Flint canola exhibited 57% injury or greater (Figures 3 & 5) and yield reductions for imazapic, chlorimuron, pyrithiobac, diclosulam, and trifloxysulfuron at all rates (Data not shown).
Pioneer 45A71 exhibited dose response injury of 21, 43, and 63% for the ¼, ½, and 1x rates of diclosulam, respectively (Figure 5). Additionally, stand was reduced from 26 to 14 plants/m row for the nontreated check to diclosulam at 82 g/ha, respectively. This indicates that imi-resistant canola is not resistant to all ALS herbicides which should be considered when planning potential rotational options for canola.
