Real-time Monitoring of the EPFL Campus Distribution ... · C-DAX Project EC FP7-ICT-2011-8 call...
Transcript of Real-time Monitoring of the EPFL Campus Distribution ... · C-DAX Project EC FP7-ICT-2011-8 call...
C-DAX is funded by the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-ICT-2011-8) under grant agreement n° 318708
Real-time Monitoring of the EPFL Campus Distribution Network using PMUs
Herman Bontius – Alliander Paolo Romano – EPFL
i-PCGRID Workshop March 26th, 2015
Power Systems @ Delft TU
Substation Automation – IEC 61850
Protection, Control, Communication
SCADA – Network Control – Grid Ops
High Voltage Design & Engineering
WAMS – WAMPAC
Situational & Security Awareness
Accenture Smart Grid Services EALA – Europe, Africa, Latin America
ABB T&D / Automation KEMA T&D Consulting
ENECO Infra / Joulz Quanta Technology
Accenture
Outline
C-DAX Project Introduction
The evolution of Active Distribution Networks (ADNs)
Alliander strategy to manage ADNs
A PMU-based approach to operate ADNs
The EPFL campus MV grid test-bench
The System Architecture • Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU)
• Phasor Data Concentrator (PDC)
• Real-time state estimator (RTSE)
Conclusions & Future Work
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015 3
C-DAX is funded by the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-ICT-2011-8) under grant agreement n° 318708
C-DAX: A Cyber-Secure Data and Control Cloud for Power Grids
C-DAX Consortium
C-DAX Project
EC FP7-ICT-2011-8 call project • C-DAX: Cyber-secure Data And Control
Cloud for power grids Duration: 01.10.2012 – 30.09.2015 Total budget: 4.315.303 Euro EU-funding: 2.931.000 Euro
C-DAX communication middleware
• Enables power systems applications to exchange information
• Implements information-centric networking (ICN) paradigm
Targeted use cases • Real-time state estimation based
on PMU measurements • Retail Energy Transactions
Project coordination: Alcatel-Lucent iMinds / Alliander
Project website: http://www.cdax.eu
Project partners
C-DAX: A Cyber-Secure Data and Control Cloud for Power Grids 5
Encrypted Cloud Communication
MV-PMU measuring principles
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015 8
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015 9
Smart Grid Communication patterns
Smart grid applications require support for diverse communication models:
• 1-to-1: e.g. control messages for specific assets
• 1-to-M: e.g. energy offers in demand response schemes
• M-to-1: e.g. energy consumption reports in demand response or smart metering
• M-to-N: e.g. multiple charging offers from different charging stations to multiple EVs
• Anycast communication: e.g. receiving an offer for voltage regulation by any suitable subset of EVs located in a certain area
• Asynchronous communication: e.g. EVs can only retrieve/deliver data while connected to the network
C-DAX: A Cyber-Secure Data and Control Cloud for Power Grids 10
ICN – Information Centric Networks Point-to-point networks
• Producer of information “pushes” data to predefined consumers via explicit point-to-point connections
ICN paradigm • Consumers “pull” or “subscribe to” the data they need regardless of who
produced the information, or when, or where it is stored • Data is collected in “topics”
Advantages: • Inherent security as network and physical locations of hosts are not
exposed (publish – subscribe communication) • Overlay network takes care of managing the connections, optimal
placement of the data within the cloud, resilience • ICN allows in-network management and processing of information, e.g., in-
network caching of frequently used data, aggregation, filtering, rate adaptation, optimal traffic management based on underlying communication infrastructure
C-DAX: A Cyber-Secure Data and Control Cloud for Power Grids 11
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015 12
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015 13
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015 14
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015 15
Prototype Purpose
• Validation of baseline communication functionalities and basic failure management of C-DAX
• Validation of security framework
• Validation of IEEE C37.118 protocol adaptation layer
Environment • IEEE 34 Bus as power grid
topology • PMU measurement data
provided by EPFL • Virtual Wall network test bed
provided by iMinds • RTSE application by EPFL
C-DAX: A Cyber-Secure Data and Control Cloud for Power Grids
16
RTSE LabView
PMU-Bus3 PubClient
PMU-Bus4 PubClient
PMU-Bus7 PubClient
PMU-Bus1 PubClient
PDC Adapter
SubClient
Base Station
Bus1 Bus3 Bus4 Bus7
LAN
Bus7Node Bus4Node Bus3Node
Security Server
Bus1Node
Monitor
Monitor
BaseStation Resolver
Virtual Wall
Laboratory validation
C-DAX: A Cyber-Secure Data and Control Cloud for Power Grids 17
PMU PMU PMU PMU
PDC PDC
C-DAX cloud
Real-time state estimation of the targeted
electrical network
Real-time model of the electrical grid
Field Trial
Purpose • Deploy C-DAX software in an existing
distribution grid • Evaluate applicability of C-DAX under
realistic conditions Environment
• Distribution grid provided by Alliander including a solid and fast IP network
• PMUs provided by National Instruments • RTSE application by EPFL • C-DAX software
Time plan • Deployment of PMUs and C-DAX
software: late 2014 • Scheduled start of field trial 2015
Alliander’s MS Livelab
National Instruments’ PMU for MV level
C-DAX: A Cyber-Secure Data and Control Cloud for Power Grids 18
Source: Alliander N.V.
Source: National Instruments Sweden
Validation results
19
Test network consisting of:
1 primary substation
16 secondary substations
5 PMU’s for full feeder
observability
Evolution of Active Distribution Networks (ADN’s)
20
0 12 24 time [hours]
• Ultra-short term volatility
63%
2 sec
HV
MV
LV
Characteristics: • Bidirectional power flows
PV o
utpu
t pow
er [
pu.]
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
We have : Very reliable power service (CML<20min/yr) 99% underground cabled Relatively low capacity (1.3 kW/p residence),
heating/cooling is Natural Gas powered (today). Heavily regulated /owned by local government We face : High penetration private EV CP’s Residential PV is promoted Increasing of heat-pumps penetration
How to cope with increasing dynamics and unpredictable power flows in MV/LV?
Managing Alliander’s Distribution Networks
21 i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
No regret options:
Analytics : • Forecasting customer behavior and grid behavior,
Demand Side Management: • Using prosumer flexibility, local balancing, curtailment options
Measure & Control DN ADN: • ‘Distribution Automation’, Smart Metering, PMU MV
monitoring ?
And……Grid Reinforcements !!
Alliander Strategy
22 i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
A PMU-based approach to operate ADNs
23
= Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU)
= Feeder Monitoring, Control Unit (PDC+RTSE+control+protection)
Monitoring infrastructure components:
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
The EPFL campus smart-grid project
24
An ideal laboratory: 40 buses MV grid (20 kV line-to-line); 30 MW peak load; 6 MW peak CHP; 2.5 MW peak PV; 1 MW peak, 0.5 MWh Li-Titanate storage system; DSM to be deployed in two buildings
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
The system architecture (1st equipped feeder)
25 i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
“F-Class” PMUs for Distribution Networks
26
< 0.1% TVE < 0.1% Mag. error < 0.1% TVE < 0.05 Phase error 1% TVE 1% Magnitude error 1% TVE 0.573 Phase error
Design requirements :
High-accuracy • TVE << 1%
• Harmonics/dynamics rejection
High-speed • High reporting rates
• Reduced latencies
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
EPFL PMU prototype
27
[1] P. Romano, “Enhanced Interpolated-DFT for Synchrophasor Estimation in FPGAs: Theory, Implementation, and Validation of a PMU Prototype", Dec 2014.
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
Synchrophasor estimation algorithm: • IpDFT-based • Spectral interf. compensation • Sliding window DFT technique
(MSDFT)
compactRIO-based PMU prototype: • FPGA-based prototype • Extreme determinism • Low latencies (30 ms) • Reporting rates up to 10000 fps
(typically reduced to 50 fps)
PMU measurements accuracy assessment
28 i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
Comments:
• TVEmax = 0.027 % • TVEavg = 0.024 %
• FEmax= 4⋅10-4 • FEavg= 9⋅10-5
• RFEmax= 6⋅10-3 • RFEavg = 1⋅10-3
Substation setup – 0.1 class sensors + PMU
C-DAX: A Cyber-Secure Data and Control Cloud for Power Grids 29
30
Real-time State Estimation (RTSE) of ADN’s
Real-time State Estimation (RTSE): “Process of estimating the network state (i.e., phase-to-ground node voltages) with an extremely high refresh rate (typically of several tens of frames per second) enabled by the use of synchrophasor measurements.” Advantages of adopting RTSE processes in ADNs: Implicitly reduces the number of measurement point (and the installation costs) Enables real-time network monitoring Improves measurement robustness Application fields of RTSE in ADNs: Optimal Voltage/Power control Congestion management Optimal dispatch of Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Fault detection and location Network islanding
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
Estimated state
31
Static (LWLS) vs. Dynamic (DKF) Linear RTSE
[2] Zanni, L.; Sarri, S.; Pignati, M.; Cherkaoui, R.; Paolone, M., "Probabilistic assessment of the process-noise covariance matrix of discrete Kalman filter state estimation of active distribution networks,” Aug. 2014
Error distributions of the estimated magnitude and phases of the network state per bus and per phase, with reference to the adopted DKF with Q matrix assessment and LWLS.
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
Dynamic SE
Prediction Estimation
Estimated state
PMU Measurements
Network topology
Process model Static SE PMU
Measurements
Network topology
32
Phase drift due to GPS disconnection
Missing data
Integrated Bad-data Detection Process
1. Compare expected measurements with actual ones
2. Discriminate between anomalies (bad data) and faults (fast dynamics)
3. Take proper countermeasures 4. Replace bad-data with predicted ones
[3] Pignati, M.; Zanni, L.; Sarri, S.; Cherkaoui, R.; Le Boudec, J.-Y.; Paolone, M., "A pre-estimation filtering process of bad data for linear power systems state estimators using PMUs,” Aug. 2014
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
System performances – Latency
33
PMU Telecom PDC+RTSE
Total latency: 61 ms (mean) 1.8 ms (std)
Time
Signal acquisition
Synchrophasor estimation
Data encapsulation
Network delay
Data-frame alignment
State estimation
t1 (30ms)
t2 (8ms)
t3 (≈1-15ms)
t4 (≈ 1-3ms)
t5 (≈20ms)
t6 (˂1ms)
Refresh rate: 20 ms
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015
Conclusions and Future Work
34
We have built a novel monitoring infrastructure for ADNs and validated it in the EPFL campus MV network. The system is composed by advanced PMUs and a central unit that concentrates the data and estimates the system state.
Within the next months the same system will be transplanted in one of the MV feeder of the Alliander network in the Netherlands.
Measurements and state estimator outputs are publicly available online together with the repository of the historical data. They are accessible via smartgrid.epfl.ch.
1 2 3
i-PCGRID Workshop 2015