Eating Carbs to Lose Weight: Weight Loss Tips from Downsize Fitness
Rapid weight loss followed by recovery time does not...
Transcript of Rapid weight loss followed by recovery time does not...
Rapid weight loss followed by recovery time does not affect judo-relatedperformance
GUILHERME G. ARTIOLI1, RODRIGO T. IGLESIAS1, EMERSON FRANCHINI2,
BRUNO GUALANO1, DANIEL B. KASHIWAGURA2, MARINA Y. SOLIS1,
FABIANA B. BENATTI1, MARINA FUCHS1, & ANTONIO H. LANCHA JUNIOR1
1Laboratory of Applied Nutrition and 2Combat Sports and Martial Arts Research Group, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo,
Brazil
(Accepted 20 October 2009)
AbstractIn this study, we investigated the effects of rapid weight loss followed by a 4-h recovery on judo-related performance. Sevenweight-cycler athletes were assigned to a weight loss group (5% body weight reduction by self-selected regime) and sevennon-weight-cyclers to a control group (no weight reduction). Body composition, performance, glucose, and lactate wereassessed before and after weight reduction (5–7 days apart; control group kept weight stable). The weight loss group had 4 hto re-feed and rehydrate after the weigh-in. Food intake was recorded during the weight loss period and recovery after theweigh-in. Performance was evaluated through a specific judo exercise, followed by a 5-min judo combat and by three boutsof the Wingate test. Both groups significantly improved performance after the weight loss period. No interaction effects wereobserved. The energy and macronutrient intake of the weight loss group were significantly lower than for the control group.The weight loss group consumed large amounts of food and carbohydrate during the 4-h recovery period. No changes wereobserved in lactate concentration, but a significant decrease in glucose during rest was observed in the weight loss group. Inconclusion, rapid weight loss did not affect judo-related performance in experienced weight-cyclers when the athletes had4 h to recover. These results should not be extrapolated to inexperienced weight-cyclers.
Keywords: Martial arts, performance, energy restriction, weight-cyclers
Introduction
Judo is an Olympic sport that is practised worldwide.
Judo competitions are organized according to weight
class, which is also the case for wrestling and other
combat sports. The purpose of weight class divisions
is to create equitable matches among competitors in
terms of strength, agility, and leverage. Several
studies on wrestling have determined that most
athletes markedly reduce their body weight a few
days before competitions (Oppliger, Steen, & Scott,
2003; Steen & Brownell, 1990). They do so to try to
qualify in a lighter weight class to gain an advantage
over smaller and weaker opponents. Although there
is only limited data about rapid weight loss among
judo players, the magnitude and methods of weight
reduction among this population appear to be very
similar to the patterns reported in wrestlers (Artioli,
Scagliusi, Polacow, Gualano, & Lancha Junior,
2007b).
Although the negative impact of rapid weight
loss on health status and on several physiological
processes is well established (Choma, Sforzo, &
Keller, 1998; Degoutte et al., 2006; Oppliger, Case,
Horswill, Landry, & Shelter, 1996), the effects of
rapid weight loss on competitive performance remain
unclear. The major reason for this controversy is the
lack of similarity between study protocols and the
competitive environment. For instance, most studies
have shown that a significant decrease in high-
intensity anaerobic performance occurs after weight
reduction (Filaire, Maso, Degoutte, Jouanel, & Lac,
2001; Hickner et al., 1991; McMurray, Proctor, &
Wilson, 1991; Webster, Rutt, & Weltman, 1990),
but these studies did not allow athletes to re-feed and
rehydrate after weighing in. During both wrestling
and judo competitions, there is a period of 3–24 h
between weigh-in and the beginning of combat
during which athletes can recover from rapid weight
loss. Studies that allowed athletes 5 h of recovery
Correspondence: G. G. Artioli, Laboratory of Applied Nutrition, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Professor Mello Moraes
65, Butanta, Cidade Universitaria, Sao Paulo – SP 05508-900, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]
Journal of Sports Sciences, January 1st 2010; 28(1): 21–32
ISSN 0264-0414 print/ISSN 1466-447X online � 2010 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/02640410903428574
time after weigh-in found that rapid weight loss
did not affect anaerobic performance (Fogelholm,
Koskinen, Laakso, Rankinen, & Ruokonen, 1993;
Klinzing & Karpowicz, 1986; Rankin, Ocel, & Craft,
1996; Serfass, Stull, Alexander, & Ewing, 1984).
However, these studies do have their limitations,
including: (1) exercise protocols were excessively
short to simulate the physiological demand of
competition (Klinzing & Karpowicz, 1986); (2)
exercise protocols did not use muscle groups or
motor gestures specific to those used in competition
(Fogelholm et al., 1993; Rankin et al., 1996; Serfass
et al., 1984); and (3) the standardized diets used did
not mimic those used in the competitive environ-
ment (Horswill, Hickner, Scott, Costill, & Gould,
1990; McMurray et al., 1991; Viitasalo, Kyrolainen,
Bosco, & Alen, 1987).
In all international male judo competitions, the
finalists perform five or more combats on the same
day, with the recovery time between bouts varying
from a few minutes to a few hours. Additionally, in
high-level judo, in which the technical and tactical
standard of the athletes is very similar, most matches
last about 4–5 min (Castarlenas & Planas, 1997).
Consequently, the metabolic demand of a judo
competition is high and cannot be simulated with
short exercise protocols lasting only 3 min or less. In
addition to a lack of recovery time after weigh-in
(Filaire et al., 2001; Hickner et al., 1991; Horswill
et al., 1990; McMurray et al., 1991; Umeda et al.,
2004; Webster et al., 1990) and the dissimilarity with
the competitive environment (Filaire et al., 2001;
Ribisl & Herbert, 1970; Serfass et al., 1984), the
absence of a control group (Burge, Carey, & Payne,
1993; Filaire et al., 2001; Finn, Dolgener, &
Williams, 2004; Fogelholm et al., 1993; Hickner
et al., 1991; Horswill et al., 1990; Klinzing &
Karpowicz, 1986; McMurray et al., 1991; Rankin
et al., 1996; Ribisl & Herbert, 1970; Serfass et al.,
1984; Timpmann, Oopik, Paasuke, & Ereline, 2008;
Umeda et al., 2004; Webster et al., 1990) is another
important methodological limitation that might also
lead to misinterpretation of weight loss effects on
competitive performance.
In view of the above, the aim of the present study
was to determine whether rapid weight loss achieved
by typical diets and followed by a 4-h recovery period
would affect the high-intensity, judo-related anaero-
bic performance of weight-cyclers.
Methods and materials
Participants
Fourteen experienced male judo competitors took
part in this study, all of whom were actively compet-
ing at regional level or above. They were divided into
two groups of seven athletes according to the
following criteria: athletes who were familiar with
rapid weight loss procedures (weight-cyclers) were
assigned to the weight loss group, whereas the
athletes who were not familiar with such procedures
(non-weight-cyclers) were assigned to the control
group. The athletes in the weight loss group had
reduced weight before competitions at least six times
a year over the previous 3 years, while the controls
had not regularly engaged in rapid weight loss
in the 2 years preceding the study. Table I shows
the main characteristics of the participants. All of
the procedures were approved by the Institutional
Ethics Committee. We provided the athletes with
a complete explanation of the study’s objectives
and procedures, after which they gave their signed
informed consent before participating in the study.
Experimental design
The athletes from both the weight loss group and
control group attended the laboratory on two
different occasions (pre- and post-intervention) 5–7
days apart. Both evaluations were made at the
same time of the day for each athlete and, on both
occasions, they underwent anthropometric, perfor-
mance, and metabolic evaluation. All athletes were
instructed to abstain from alcohol, caffeine, and
intense exercise in the 24 h preceding their assess-
ments. They were also instructed to come to the
laboratory at baseline in a well hydrated and fed
state. Control athletes were asked to maintain the
same pattern of fluid and food ingestion in the 24 h
preceding both test days. The athletes from the
weight loss group were asked to lose 5% of their body
weight using their usual methods. However, for
ethical reasons, an exclusion criterion for participa-
tion was the regular use of laxatives, diuretics or
diet pills. Thus, these methods were not allowed to
be used. Athletes were allowed 5 days to reach
the designated weight. During the last 3 days of the
weight reduction period, they were required to
complete food records. Although the control group
did not reduce their body weight, they were also
required to complete the food records. We instructed
athletes to record food intake only during the final
Table I. Participants’ characteristics (mean+ s).
Weight loss (n¼7) Control (n¼7)
Age (years) 20+ 4 22+4
Weight (kg) 77.9+ 12.2 67.3+5.8
Height (m) 1.75+ 0.06 1.70+0.06
Judo experience (years) 12+ 4 13+3
Note: No significant differences were observed between groups at
baseline.
22 G. G. Artioli et al.
3 days because there is substantial evidence that
rapid weight loss in wrestlers (Oppliger et al., 2003;
Steen & Brownell, 1990) and judo players (Artioli
et al., 2007b) occurs mainly in the 48 h before the
weigh-in. Athletes were instructed by a dietitian
about the procedures for properly recording a
food diary. Energy and macronutrient intakes were
examined using software based on a national table of
food composition.
After the weight loss period, athletes were weighed
and appraised for anthropometry. Subsequently,
they were allowed to re-feed and rehydrate for 4 h.
This period was chosen based on previous unpub-
lished observations of our group during regional and
state championships (average recovery time after
weight-in was 230+58 min) as well as the schedule
of the 2007 World Judo Championship and 2008
Olympic Games (in which first combats occurred
3–5 h after weigh-in). The athletes were instructed
to maintain the same pattern of food and fluid
ingestion that they adopted in competition. After
the 4-h recovery period, they were submitted to a
performance evaluation protocol. Members of the
control group were submitted to the same proce-
dures as for the weight loss group, except for the
weight reduction and, consequently, for the 4-h
recovery period. Figure 1 illustrates the experimental
design as well as the protocol for performance
evaluation.
Judo-related performance evaluation
To evaluate the performance of judo athletes as
accurately and specifically as possible, and to
ensure external validity and control of the internal
variables, we designed a multi-task protocol that
combined: (1) situations highly specific to those
observed in an actual judo environment, (2) effort
and recovery patterns similar to those seen in
judo combats (Franchini, Takito, Nakamura,
Matsushigue & Kiss, 2003), and (3) ergometric
testing that has been successfully used previously
for assessing judo athletes (Artioli et al., 2007;
Franchini et al., 2003).
Figure 1. Experimental design of the study (A) and the protocol for judo-related performance evaluation (B). Of note, uchi-komi is a specific
judo exercise in which athletes perform a judo technique repeatedly without throwing their partner (for a complete explanation, see text).
WL¼weight loss group; CON¼ control group; PRE¼pre-intervention; POST¼post-intervention; recov.¼ recovery.
Rapid weight loss and judo performance 23
The athletes warmed up freely for 5 min before
the beginning of the performance evaluation pro-
tocol. They were required to perform three bouts
of maximal-intensity uchi-komi exercise, which
consisted in repeatedly applying a judo technique
(Tsuri-Komi-Goshi) on a partner as fast as possible
without throwing him. The bouts lasted 10 s,
20 s, and 30 s respectively, with a 10-s recovery
between bouts. Subsequently, the athletes rested
for 5 min before performing a 5-min judo combat.
The participants’ opponents were chosen based
on similarities in body weight and technical ability
to ensure even-handed contests. The participants
were paired with the same opponent both pre- and
post-intervention. The opponents were not evalu-
ated when they arrived at the laboratory to spar
with the athletes evaluated. After their combat, the
participants recovered for 15 min before under-
going three bouts of a 30-s Wingate test for the
upper limbs. Each bout lasted 30 s and the bouts
were interspersed by 3 min of recovery.
All combats were recorded for further analysis.
The time structure (i.e. total effort time, total
recovery time, total standing combat time, total
ground work) and the number of attacks performed
(i.e. number of throws attempted in stand fighting
plus number of immobilizations and chokes at-
tempted in ground fighting) were recorded. During
the uchi-komi exercise and the Wingate bouts, the
athletes were provided with strong verbal encourage-
ment. The upper-body Wingate tests were con-
ducted in a device specifically designed for this
purpose. The participants remained seated and
the shoulders, abdomen, and legs were securely
fastened with belts throughout the Wingate bouts.
Velocity sensors on the ergometer wheels were
connected to computer software, which recorded
revolutions per minute and calculated the power
output second-by-second. The load was set at
0.5 kp � kg71 of total body weight. The absolute
load was the same on both test days. For the weight
loss group onn the post-intervention occasion, the
relative power was calculated according to body
weight after recovery from weight reduction. In
addition to relative power, absolute power was also
reported, as the fluctuation in body weight can be a
confounding variable.
Test–retest studies from our group (unpublished
observations) have indicated that uchi-komi exercise
is repeatable (ratio limits of agreement: 0.95 to
1.1) and free of systematic errors (test 1: 76+ 9;
test 2: 76+ 8; t¼ 0.87; P¼ 0.4; n¼ 16). Similarly,
combat simulations have shown similar trends
for technical patterns (test 1: 36+ 7; test 2:
35+ 8; t¼ 0.69; P¼ 0.51; 95% limits of agree-
ment: 75 to 6 attacks) and the lactate response
(test 1: 11.1+ 2.3; test 2: 11.2+ 2.5; t¼70.21;
P¼ 0.84; 95% limits of agreement: 72.5 to 2.3
mmol � l71).
Anthropometric measurements
Body composition was determined by underwater
weighing. Each athlete was weighed at least eight
times after maximum expiration; the mean of the
three highest values was considered to be the
underwater weight. Body density was determined
according to Wilmore and Behnke (1969), body
fat according to Siri (1961), and residual volume
according to Goldman and Becklake (1959). Body
mass was measured on two occasions for the
control group (i.e. pre- and post-intervention) and
three times for the weight loss group (i.e. once
pre-intervention and twice post-intervention – dur-
ing the weigh-in and after recovery from weight loss).
Blood sampling and biochemical analysis
Blood samples (50 ml) were taken from the earlobe
during a resting period, 3 min after uchi-komi
exercise, 3 min after the combat, and 3 min after
the final Wingate bout. For the weight loss group at
the post-intervention assessment, resting blood
samples were taken before the simulated weigh-in.
The samples were immediately stored in NaF 2%
solution and, on the same day, were centrifuged and
the plasma submitted to analysis for glucose and
lactate concentration.
Plasma glucose was determined by an enzymatic-
colorimetric assay using commercial kits. Plasma
lactate was determined electrochemically using an
automated device (YSI 1500 - Yellow Springs, OH).
At the time of each sample collection for bio-
chemical analysis, an additional 50 ml of blood were
collected from the earlobe into capillary tubes for
haematocrit determination. The ends of the tubes
were sealed and then placed in a capillary tube
centrifuge. The proportion of red blood cells was
determined using a haematocrit reader.
Statistical analyses
For all variables, with the exception of food
intake data, we performed a mixed-model, two-way
(time6 group) analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Four different covariance structure matrices were
tested (i.e. auto-regressive, unstructured, toeplitz,
and compound symmetric), and Schwarz’s Bayesian
criterion was used to choose the best model for
each data set. This procedure permits parsimonious
modelling of the covariance structure, therefore
minimizing the Type I error (Littell, Pendergast, &
Natarajan, 2000; Ugrinowitsch, Fellingham, &
Ricard, 2004). When significant main effects were
24 G. G. Artioli et al.
observed, we conducted a Tukey post-hoc test. We
performed a non-paired Student’s t-test for food
intake data. Furthermore, SAS1 proc IML was
used to perform a simulation to determine the
power of the statistical tests, as suggested by Littell
and colleagues (Littell, Milliken, Stroup, Wolfinger,
& Schabenberger, 2006). Expected means and
variance (Hickner et al., 1991) were used as input
to simulate mean power data using an autoregres-
sive correlation structure within the participants’
measurements. Seven participants produced a
power of 0.8 in the comparison between groups
for mean power, the most important dependent
variable. All analyses were performed using the
statistical software SAS v.9.1. The data are pre-
sented as means+ standard deviations (s). The
alpha value was set previously at 5%.
Results
The athletes in the weight loss group used a
combination of severe energy restriction and hypo-
hydration-inducing methods (i.e. reducing fluid
intake, exercising with plastic suits, and/or exercis-
ing in heated environments) to achieve their
weight loss goals. All of them maintained the same
training schedule throughout the experimental
period. As expected, the athletes from the weight
loss group successfully reduced their body weight
by 4.8+ 1.1% from pre- to post-intervention
(P5 0.001), whereas the controls maintained a
stable body weight (Table II). After the recovery
period, weight loss athletes regained 51+ 13% of
their lost body weight, so they were slightly lighter
in comparison with baseline. Weight reduction
resulted in a discrete but significant decrease in
body fat and in a marked decrease in lean body
mass in the weight loss group, but no differences
were observed in the control group (Table II). The
weight loss group ingested significantly less carbo-
hydrates, fat, and protein than the control group
(P5 0.001) (Table III). During the 4-h recovery
period, the weight loss group ingested 1391+ 375
kcal (201+ 62 g of carbohydrates; 50+ 16 g of fat;
34+ 23 g of protein).
There were no group or time main effects or
interaction effect for time structure patterns in
the combats (Table IV). Furthermore, we did not
observe any significant differences between groups
in the number of attacks during judo combats
(Figure 2).
For all of the Wingate performance variables, we
observed a discrete improvement in performance
after intervention compared with baseline in both
groups. As shown in Figures 3 and 4, there was a
significant main effect of time for relative and
absolute mean power, peak power, and total work.
However, no main group or interaction effects were
observed, suggesting that rapid weight loss did not
affect performance. Figures 5 and 6 depict second-
by-second relative and absolute power output,
respectively, obtained in the three Wingate bouts
and illustrate that performance was better after than
before the intervention in both groups. No main or
interaction effects were observed for haematocrit
values by group or test occasion. Resting plasma
glucose concentration was significantly lower in the
weight loss group after the intervention compared
with baseline, but no other differences were observed
between groups or conditions (Figure 7). Plasma
lactate did not differ between groups or conditions
(Figure 7).
Discussion
The main finding of the present study was that the
rapid reduction of roughly 5% of body mass achieved
by typical judo athletes’ procedures, when followed
by a 4-h recovery period, did not impair simulated
judo performance or arm power.
The present study design ensured strong external
validity because we allowed the athletes to use their
own methods for reducing and recovering weight. In
addition, the performance evaluation protocol had
great specificity for real judo demands in terms of
metabolic and muscle group activities as well as in
terms of motor gestures and effort/recovery time
patterns.
The athletes from the weight loss group success-
fully reached their objective of a 5% weight
Table II. Body weight and body composition of the weight loss and control groups before (PRE) and after (POST) the intervention
(mean+ s).
Weight loss Control
PRE POST PRE POST
Body weight (kg) 77.9+12.2* 74.1+11.4 67.3+ 5.8 67.4+ 5.8
Body fat (kg) 8.8+2.6*# 8.0+2.3** 4.0+ 1.6 4.2+ 1.7
Lean body mass (kg) 66.2+4.6* 63.5+4.9 63.3+ 5.1 63.2+ 5.1
*Significantly different from POST (P50.01). #Significantly different from control before the intervention (P5 0.01). **Significantly
different from control after the intervention (P5 0.01).
Rapid weight loss and judo performance 25
reduction. Similar to other studies (Filaire et al.,
2001; McCargar & Crawford, 1992), the most
weight lost was as fat-free mass, although a slight
decrease in body fat was also observed. The judo
combat analysis showed no significant differences
between groups or time for any variable. This is
important to the internal validity of the study, as it
ensured that athletes were submitted to similar effort
patterns regardless of group or time. Finn et al.
(2004) and Buford and colleagues (Buford, Rossi,
Smith, O’Brien, & Pickering, 2006) suggested that
chronic weight-cyclers can adapt to weight loss
procedures and become less affected by negative
effects on performance. In view of this theory, we
intentionally assigned the athletes to the weight loss
or the control group, not randomly but according to
a specific criterion: a weight-cycler or not. Despite
some decrease in the internal validity, this approach
allows a better application of the results to the judo
competitors’ population. Although the groups dif-
fered in total body fat at baseline, which might
suggest unbalanced groups, no significant differences
were observed at baseline for any performance
variables, therefore minimizing the weight of this
argument.
It has been well demonstrated that, unless a high-
carbohydrate diet is adopted during the weight
reduction period, rapid weight loss decreases perfor-
mance if there is no recovery time after simulated
weigh-in (Filaire et al., 2001; Hickner et al., 1991;
Horswill et al., 1990; McMurray et al., 1991; Umeda
et al., 2004; Webster et al., 1990). This suggests that
the possible metabolic adaptations caused by chroni-
cally weight cycling are not associated with the
period of weight reduction but, rather, with the
recovery after weigh-in. Previous studies have re-
ported that an approximate 5% body weight loss
followed by a recovery period of about 3–5 h did not
affect anaerobic performance (Finn et al., 2004;
Figure 2. Individual (A) and mean+ standard deviation (B) number of attacks in the judo combats. No significant differences were
observed. WL¼weight loss group; CON¼ control group; PRE¼pre-intervention; POST¼ post-intervention.
Table IV. Temporal patterns of the judo combats (mean+s).
Total effort time Total recovery time Total standing combat Total ground work
PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST
Weight loss 229+ 17 228+ 24 71+17 72+24 199+9 191+ 18 30+ 14 38+ 19
Control 237+ 11 239+ 8 63+11 61+8 191+19 204+ 22 47+ 17 35+ 19
Note: No significant differences were observed.
Table III. Average energy and macronutrients intake reported by
the participants in 3-day food records (mean+ s, with range in
parentheses).
Weight loss Control
Energy (kcal � kg71 � day71)* 19.6+4.4
(14.4–25.8)
38.7+5.5
(32.6–45.3)
Carbohydrate (g � kg71 � day71)* 2.7+0.8
(2.1–4.1)
5.6+0.9
(4.8–7.1)
Fat (g � kg71 � day71)* 0.5+0.1
(0.3–0.7)
1.2+0.4
(0.6–1.6)
Protein (g � kg71 � day71)* 1.0+0.3
(0.7–1.5)
1.7+0.4
(1.2–2.3)
*Significant differences between groups (P50.001).
26 G. G. Artioli et al.
Fogelholm et al., 1993; Klinzing & Karpowicz, 1986;
Rankin et al., 1996; Ribisl & Herbert, 1970; Serfass
et al., 1984). These studies, however, did not use
performance evaluation protocols with a high simi-
larity to real competition demands. In addition, there
is some evidence that rapid weight loss can affect
performance even with long recovery periods of
approximately 17 h (Oopik et al., 1996). Therefore,
we hypothesized that with a more intense and
specific exercise protocol, we would observe adverse
Figure 3. Absolute (A) and relative (B) mean power, and absolute (C) and relative (D) peak power, attained in the three upper-body Wingate
tests pre- and post-intervention. *Time main effect (P50.01) for pre- vs. post. WL¼weight loss group; CON¼ control group; PRE¼ pre-
intervention; POST¼post-intervention.
Figure 4. Relative (A) and absolute (B) total work obtained in the three upper-body Wingate tests. *Time main effect (P5 0.01) for pre- vs.
post. WL¼weight loss group; CON¼ control group; PRE¼ pre-intervention; POST¼post-intervention.
Rapid weight loss and judo performance 27
effects of rapid weight loss on performance. How-
ever, we did not observe main group or interaction
effects for any performance variables, only main
effects of time. These results suggest that athletes
were able to perform the evaluation protocol some-
what better after than before the intervention, which
was not influenced by weight loss procedures. This
was probably the result of some learning effect of the
protocol. Despite the fact that all the tests used have
a high individual reliability, their combination in the
same protocol may have resulted in a systematic
error. Although this was a limitation of the present
study, the inclusion of the control group allowed us
to distinguish the learning effects from the weight
loss effects. Therefore, even with the learning effect
we were able to make a correct interpretation of our
data.
Although it is well recognized that the availability
of carbohydrates as a substrate for muscle and
the central nervous system is a critical factor
for the performance of prolonged exercise sessions
(i.e.490 min), the availability of carbohydrates is
also important for the performance of short-term,
high-intensity exercise (for a review, see Hawley &
Hopkins, 1995). Accordingly, it has been shown
that when rapid weight loss is achieved by a high-
carbohydrate diet, performance does not appear
to be affected (Horswill et al., 1990; McMurray
et al., 1991). However, this cannot explain our
results, since the energy and especially the carbohy-
drate intake in the weight loss group (*2.7 g �kg71 � day71) was some way below the minimum
recommendations for athletes (45 g � kg71 �day71). Nevertheless, the literature also suggests that
a high-carbohydrate diet is more effective than a low-
carbohydrate diet during the recovery period in
regaining performance (Finn et al., 2004; Rankin
et al., 1996). In the study conducted by Rankin and
colleagues, a recovery diet of *275 g of carbohydrate
was provided to athletes during a 5-h recovery period
after weight loss. The authors found that athletes who
received this high amount of carbohydrates recovered
performance better than those who received *170 g
of carbohydrates. In comparison, athletes of the
present study consumed a large amount of food
during the recovery period ensuring a high intake of
carbohydrates (*201 g within 4 h), which was not as
high as that of the high-carbohydrate group of Rankin
and colleagues, but still exceeded the recommended
requirements for rapid post-exercise recovery of
Figure 5. Relative power output during each second of the upper-body Wingate tests. WL¼weight loss group; CON¼ control group;
PRE¼pre-intervention; POST¼post-intervention.
28 G. G. Artioli et al.
muscle glycogen (Blom, Costill, & Vollestad, 1987).
Thus, it is likely that weight loss followed by
nutritional recovery did not affect competitive per-
formance, even in a truly demanding protocol,
because the weight-cycler athletes, who seem to be
less subject to the negative effects of weight loss, had
enough time to consume large amounts of carbohy-
drates in the recovery period. However, as we
assessed only experienced weight-cyclers, caution
should be exercised when extrapolating the present
findings to other judo populations, especially in-
experienced weight-cyclers, as they could be more
prone to the negative effects of rapid weight loss.
Some authors (Oppliger et al., 1996) have
reported that glycogen restoration after a severe
depletion can take up to 24 h or longer. Horswill
et al. (1990), using a low-carbohydrate weight loss
protocol, which knowingly depletes muscle glycogen,
observed a significant decrease in anaerobic perfor-
mance as well as in blood lactate. According to these
authors, the best possible explanation for these
results is glycogen depletion, which would decrease
substrate availability for glycolysis. Therefore, energy
transfer and performance would be negatively
affected and, as a consequence, lactate production
would also be diminished. In the present study,
neither performance nor lactate was affected by
weight loss after the 4 h of recovery. This would
suggest that muscular glycogen content after recov-
ery was unlikely to have been depleted. As it is likely
that the severe food restriction caused glycogen
depletion in the weight loss group, our findings
suggest that the chronic weight-cyclers were able to
recover glycogen in a much shorter period than 24 h.
Although there is no explanation for how weight-
cyclers are able to maintain performance despite the
weight loss, our data support the hypothesis that
weight-cyclers can be metabolically adapted as a
consequence of chronic weight-cycling. These adap-
tations might include in particular a faster muscle
glycogen restoration, which would allow athletes
a rapid recovery after weight loss. Further studies
Figure 6. Absolute power output during each second of the upper-body Wingate tests.
Rapid weight loss and judo performance 29
should confirm this hypothesis, since we were unable
to perform muscle biopsies to assess muscle glycogen
content and enzyme activities.
No differences were observed in plasma lactate
concentration, indicating that the energy transfer
via glycolysis was not affected by weight reduction.
This reinforces the hypothesis that the recovery diet
was able to restore muscle glycogen, which certainly
contributed to the maintenance of baseline perfor-
mance after weight loss. Some studies have reported
that low-carbohydrate weight loss diets, which result
in severe glycogen depletion, elicit a lower lactate
response to exercise and impairment of anaerobic
performance (Finn et al., 2004; Horswill et al.,
1990). Our results also indicate that within 4 h
athletes can bring performance to baseline values,
even recovering as little as 50% of the lost weight.
This probably occurred because restoration of
performance after weight loss is not related to the
regaining of body weight but to the energy and
glycogen restoration.
Rapid weight loss induces several acute changes in
hormonal status. Previous studies have shown a
decrease in insulin concentration (Degoutte et al.,
2006), which can lead to an increase in growth
hormone (McMurray et al., 1991) and cortisol
concentration (Degoutte et al., 2006). The increase
in growth hormone is related to a greater lipolytic
activity, which can be seen as a bodily response to
the energy restriction required to mobilize fat stores
to obtain energy. Although hypoglycaemia is believed
to be the trigger for hypoinsulinaemia and for
elevated growth hormone and cortisol concentra-
tions, to the best of our knowledge no studies have
demonstrated a decrease in glucose concentration
after acute weight loss. Our results clearly show a
marked decrease in plasma glucose concentrations in
the weight loss group after weight reduction, which
might partially explain the acute hormonal imbalance
reported in previous studies.
The present study has some limitations. Although
we assumed that weight loss impairs high-intensity
performance, we cannot state with certainty that
our athletes experienced performance decrements
after weight reduction as we did not test them
immediately after weigh-in. However, some litera-
ture states that rapid weight loss is detrimental
to performance when athletes are not allowed to
recovery from weight reduction (Filaire et al.,
2001; Hickner et al., 1991; Horswill et al., 1990;
Klinzing & Karpowicz, 1986; McMurray et al., 1991;
Umeda et al., 2004; Webster et al., 1990), thus
Figure 7. Plasma glucose and lactate at rest and after exercise. *Significantly different from post-intervention. WL¼weight loss group;
CON¼ control group; PRE¼ pre-intervention; POST¼ post-intervention; UK¼uchi-komi; JC¼ judo combat; WT¼Wingate test.
30 G. G. Artioli et al.
supporting our assumption. Another limitation is the
non-randomized allocation of athletes to experimen-
tal groups. Although such a procedure decreased
internal validity, it allowed a more realistic approach
to the problem. Furthermore, no differences were
found at baseline for any performance variables,
suggesting that no important imbalances between
groups were present. Finally, the lack of a familiar-
ization trial is a limitation in our experimental
design, as it could have reduced the learning effects
observed between trials. However, because the
athletes were in the middle of a competitive season
when the study was conducted, access to the athletes
was limited and the number of trials had to be
reduced to ensure adherence. Nonetheless, the
inclusion of a control group permitted us to control
the variation between trials. Finally, the current
results are not applicable to other judo populations
because we tested only experienced weight-cyclers.
Therefore, athletes not familiar with rapid weight
loss procedures may be negatively affected by rapid
weight loss followed by a short recovery time. Future
studies should investigate whether previous experi-
ence of weight loss might be a factor in weight
cycling-mediated performance changes.
It is important to highlight that rapid weight
loss is related to risk of poor health. In 1997,
three young athletes died due to hyperthermia and
dehydration in the USA. This tragic event was
related to intentional acute weight loss, since the
three athletes were wrestlers preparing for competi-
tion. It is well known that the prevalence of rapid
weight loss among combat sports athletes is quite
high (Artioli et al., 2007; Steen & Brownell, 1990).
Athletes’ adherence to these procedures is probably
high because they feel that the competitive benefits
outweight the apparent risks. Importantly, we de-
monstrated in the present study that athletes can
obtain a competitive advantage using rapid weight
loss, since they are able to compete against smaller
and theoretically weaker opponents without any
impairment in physical performance. Thus, we can
affirm that the present rules and scheduling
for competitions encourage athletes to reduce
weight. In view of this, we believe that rule changes
should immediately be considered by the Interna-
tional Judo Federation as a way of lowering the
risk to health of judo athletes. The US National
College Athletic Association (NCAA) was successful
in its weight certification programme, and after
some rules modifications, ‘‘the weight cutting
problem’’ became less harmful and aggressive
(Davis et al., 2002). Some similar rule changes
adopted by the NCAA, such as a reduction in the
recovery time after weigh-in, should also be adopted
in judo and other combat sports where weight loss
is prevalent.
In conclusion, the present study has shown
that judo-related performance is not affected by an
average 5% body weight loss in experienced weight-
cyclers if they are able to recover for 4 h. As rapid
weight loss is not free of risk to health, rule changes
should be implemented by the International Judo
Federation, as has been done by the NCAA, to
prevent serious adverse occurrences.
References
Artioli, G. G., Gualano, B., Coelho, D. F., Benatti, F. B., Gailey,
A. W., & Lancha Junior, A. H. (2007a). Does sodium-
bicarbonate ingestion improve simulated judo performance?
International Journal of Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,
17, 206–217.
Artioli, G. G., Scagliusi, F. B., Polacow, V. O., Gualano, B., &
Lancha Junior, A. H. (2007b). Magnitude and methods of
rapid weight loss in elite judo athletes. Brazilian Journal of
Nutrition, 20, 307–315 (in Portuguese).
Blom, P. C., Costill, D. L., & Vollestad, N. K. (1987). Exhaustive
running: Inappropriate as a stimulus of muscle glycogen super-
compensation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 19,
398–403.
Buford, T. W., Rossi, S. J., Smith, D. B., O’Brien, M. S., &
Pickering, C. (2006). The effect of a competitive wrestling
season on body weight, hydration, and muscular performance
in collegiate wrestlers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Research, 20, 689–692.
Burge, C. M., Carey, M. F., & Payne, W. R. (1993). Rowing
performance, fluid balance, and metabolic function following
dehydration and rehydration. Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise, 25, 1358–1364.
Castarlenas, J. L., & Planas, A. (1997). Study of time structure of
judo combats. Apunts, 47, 23–39 (in Spanish).
Choma, C. W., Sforzo, G. A., & Keller, B. A. (1998). Impact of
rapid weight loss on cognitive function in collegiate wrestlers.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30, 746–749.
Davis, S. E., Dwyer, G. B., Reed, K., Bopp, C., Stosic, J., &
Shepanski, M. (2002). Preliminary investigation: The impact of
the NCAA Wrestling Weight Certification Program on weight
cutting. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 16, 305–
307.
Degoutte, F., Jouanel, P., Begue, R. J., Colombier, M., Lac, G.,
Pequignot, J. M., et al. (2006). Food restriction, performance,
biochemical, psychological, and endocrine changes in judo
athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 27, 9–18.
Filaire, E., Maso, F., Degoutte, F., Jouanel, P., & Lac, G. (2001).
Food restriction, performance, psychological state and lipid
values in judo athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine,
22, 454–459.
Finn, K. J., Dolgener, F. A., & Williams, R. B. (2004). Effects of
carbohydrate refeeding on physiological responses and psycho-
logical and physical performance following acute weight
reduction in collegiate wrestlers. Journal of Strength and
Conditioning Research, 18, 328–333.
Fogelholm, G. M., Koskinen, R., Laakso, J., Rankinen, T., &
Ruokonen, I. (1993). Gradual and rapid weight loss: Effects on
nutrition and performance in male athletes. Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise, 25, 371–377.
Franchini, E., Takito, M. E., Nakamura, F. Y., Matsushigue,
K. Y., & Kiss, M. A. P. D. (2003). Effects of recovery type after
a judo combat on blood lactate removal and on performance in
an intermittent anaerobic task. Journal of Sports Medicine and
Physical Fitness, 43, 424–431.
Rapid weight loss and judo performance 31
Goldman, H. I., & Becklake, M. R. (1959). Respiratory function
tests. American Review of Tuberculosis and Pulmonary Disease, 79,
457–467.
Hawley, J. A., & Hopkins, W. G. (1995). Aerobic glycolytic and
aerobic lipolytic power systems: A new paradigm with implica-
tions for endurance and ultraendurance events. Sports Medicine,
19, 240–250.
Hickner, R. C., Horswill, C. A., Welker, J. M., Scott, J.,
Roemmich, J. N., & Costill, D. L. (1991). Test development
for the study of physical performance in wrestlers following
weight loss. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 12, 557–562.
Horswill, C. A., Hickner, R. C., Scott, J. R., Costill, D. L., &
Gould, D. (1990). Weight loss, dietary carbohydrate modifica-
tions, and high intensity physical performance. Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise, 22, 470–476.
Klinzing, J. E., & Karpowicz, W. (1986). The effects of rapid
weight loss and rehydratation on a wrestling performance test.
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 26, 149–156.
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., &
Schabenberger, O. (2006). SAS system for mixed models (2nd
edn.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
Littell, R. C., Pendergast, J., & Natarajan, R. (2000). Modelling
covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data.
Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1793–1819.
McCargar, L. J., & Crawford, S. M. (1992). Metabolic and
anthropometric changes with weight cycling in wrestlers.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 24, 1270–1275.
McMurray, R. G., Proctor, C. R., & Wilson, W. L. (1991). Effect
of caloric deficit and dietary manipulation on aerobic and
anaerobic exercise. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 12,
167–172.
Oopik, V., Paasuke, M., Sikku, T., Timpmann, S., Medijainen,
L., Ereline, J., et al. (1996). Effect of rapid weight loss on
metabolism and isokinetic performance capacity: A case study
of two well trained wrestlers. Journal of Sports Medicine and
Physical Fitness, 36, 127–131.
Oppliger, R. A., Case, H. S., Horswill, C. A., Landry, G. L., &
Shelter, A. C. (1996). American College of Sports Medicine
position stand: Weight loss in wrestlers. Medicine and Science in
Sports and Exercise, 28, ix–xii.
Oppliger, R. A., Steen, S. A., & Scott, J. R. (2003). Weight loss
practices of college wrestlers. International Journal of Sports
Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 13, 29–46.
Rankin, J. W., Ocel, J. V., & Craft, L. L. (1996). Effect of weight
loss and refeeding diet composition on anaerobic performance
in wrestlers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 28,
1292–1299.
Ribisl, P. M., & Herbert, W. G. (1970). Effects of rapid
weight reduction and subsequent rehydration upon the
physical working capacity of wrestlers. Research Quarterly, 41,
536–541.
Serfass, R. C., Stull, G. A., Alexander, F. F., & Ewing, J. L.
(1984). The effects of rapid weight loss and attempted
rehydration on strength and endurance of the handgripping
muscles in college wrestlers. Research Quarterly in Exercise and
Sport, 55, 46–52.
Siri, W. E. (1961). Body composition from fluid spaces and
density: Analysis of methods. In J. Brozek & A. Henschel
(Eds.), Techniques for measuring body composition (pp. 223–244).
Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National
Research Council.
Steen, S. N., & Brownell, K. D. (1990). Patterns of weight loss
and regain in wrestlers: Has the tradition changed? Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise, 22, 762–768.
Timpmann, S., Oopik, V., Paasuke, L. M., & Ereline, J. (2008).
Acute effects of self-selected regimen of rapid body mass loss in
combat sports athletes. Journal of Sports and Science in Medicine,
7, 210–217.
Ugrinowitsch, C., Fellingham, G. W., & Ricard, M. D. (2004).
Limitations of ordinary least squares models in analyzing
repeated measures data. Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise, 36, 2144–2148.
Umeda, T., Nakaji, S., Shimoyama, T., Yamamoto, Y., Totsuka,
M., & Sugawara, K. (2004). Adverse effects of energy
restriction on myogenic enzymes in judoists. Journal of Sports
Sciences, 22, 329–338.
Viitasalo, J. T., Kyrolainen, H., Bosco, C., & Alen, M. (1987).
Effects of rapid weight reduction on force production and
vertical jumping height. International Journal of Sports Medicine,
8, 281–285.
Webster, S., Rutt, R., & Weltman, A. (1990). Physiological effects
of a weight loss regimen practiced by college wrestlers. Medicine
and Science in Sports and Exercise, 22, 229–234.
Wilmore, J. H., & Behnke, A. (1969). An anthropometric
estimation of body density and lean body weight in young
men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 27, 25–31.
32 G. G. Artioli et al.
Copyright of Journal of Sports Sciences is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be
copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.