Progress in the cone analysis: Optimization and systematic checks n Introduction n Performance n...
-
Upload
stanley-roberts -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Progress in the cone analysis: Optimization and systematic checks n Introduction n Performance n...
Progress in the cone analysis:Progress in the cone analysis:Optimization and systematic Optimization and systematic
checkschecks IntroductionIntroduction PerformancePerformance Systematic Systematic
checkschecks ConclusionsConclusions
IntroductionIntroduction PerformancePerformance Systematic Systematic
checkschecks ConclusionsConclusions
H. Ruiz (IFAE Barcelona), J. Nowell (Imperial College,London),
F. Teubert, A. Moutoussi (CERN)
ALEPH
IntroductionIntroduction FSI uncertainty largelarge and correlatedcorrelated between experiments. Effort has been put in trying to understand FSIunderstand FSI, with the aim of
reducing the systematic on mreducing the systematic on mWW.
In AprilApril, some promising results based on different cone algorithms were shown during a LEP-WW workshop.– A reduction of ~2 in CR error was achieved with a 20% loss in stats
Since then:– The algorithm has been optimized (moved to hybrid cones)
– Some new models have been tested.
– Systematic checks have been made.
Attacking FSIAttacking FSIIntroduction:Introduction:
Two different approaches:
1) Use of observables to put a limit in the effects:Use of observables to put a limit in the effects:• From Q analysis, BE effect is expected to be
drastically reduced (25MeV ~5MeV)
• For CR only extreme models discarded (sk1 high kI) second approach needed.
2) Redesign the analysis to make it less sensitive to FSIRedesign the analysis to make it less sensitive to FSI optimize jets algorithm.
• Durham chosen by optimizing just statistical error
Requirements on the new algorithm:– Efficient against the different CR models
– Minimum deviation from ‘standard’ analysis
The ‘new’ jet algorithm...The ‘new’ jet algorithm... Idea:Idea: FSI effects on mW come mainly
from inter-jet region, where– Ambiguity in clustering can occur.
– Momentum interchange is possible between particles from different Ws.
– Multiplicity variations are stronger (particle flow analysis, CR).
Proposed solution:– Apply a jet algorithm that excludes information from the
interjet region cone algorithm.
Price to pay: loss of statistical power.
Introduction:Introduction:
The The hybridhybrid cone algorithm cone algorithm The best performant cone algorithm tested is the hybrid:
– Take the particles of a given Durham jet.
– Find the cone of a given ‘radius’ that contains maximum momentum.
– Recompute direction of jet excluding particles outside the cone.
• Particles outside are used for energy computation
Only one parameter: opening angle R– R can be tuned to optimize stat and syst combination.
– In the limit of large R, ‘standard’ analysis is recovered.
Can be easily applied on Zs and semileptonic events for systematic checks.
R
Introduction:Introduction:
Performance against CR Performance against CR modelsmodels
standardreference: R=0.75
@ 189GeV
Statistical degradationStatistical degradationPerformance :Performance :
R=0.75
Performance with R=0.75Performance with R=0.75
mW shiftMODEL
Dur R=.75ratio
SK1 (100%) 276 168 1.64
SK1 (kI=0.65) 30 13 2.3
Hwg CR 33 18 1.8
Rathman CR 75 43 1.74
Stat error deterioration 1.13
Some details...Some details...
Energy fraction inside the cone:
Stat error vs energy fraction in cone:
R=0.75
Performance:Performance:
Higher energies...Higher energies...
For kI=0.65For kI=0.65
no clear trend shifts averaged
Statistical degradationStatistical degradation
No large variation
Performance:Performance:Impact in mImpact in mWW
Using data:
Durham Cone, R=0.75rad
Tot Stat Sys Tot Stat Sys
Sk1 66 51 41 64 56 31
Rath 95 51 79 75 56 51
Hwg 66 51 42 64 56 32
The systematic component of the error is strongly reduced with cones. In all scenarios the total error is smaller. The comparison gets better for the combination of the 4 experiments.
very very preliminary
MMWW vs E vs Ecm cm
100M
eV
200M
eVAverage:
very preliminary
Limits on kappa? Limits on kappa? (R=0.75)(R=0.75)
kIkI
Inte
gra
l
2
Results compatible to No CR within ~1sigma , preferance for some CRNo useful limit on kappa.
very preliminary
SystematicsSystematics
Cone algorithm may have different systematics than Durham.– Example: the angular distribution of EFs within a jet affects cone
and Durham in different ways.
Some checks done:
– Usual comparison Jetset-Herwig: mW~10MeV
(=standard).
– Apply cone analysis on semi-leptonic events.
– Systematic data-MC comparison of:
• A) EF distributions.
• B) Jet properties.
• C) Effect of cones.
Semileptonics for the Semileptonics for the proposed R=0.75proposed R=0.75
A) Angular distribution of EFsA) Angular distribution of EFsaround Durham jet axisaround Durham jet axis
Angle to jet axis (rad)
Energ
y
(arb
itr.
)
MC standardMC skiData
Another angle...Another angle... Not only angle to jet axis matters:
‘Azimutal symmetry’ of jet affected by: – jets nearby.
– CR?
closest jet other W
furthest jet other W
other jet same W
angle (rad)
……defining the angle...defining the angle...
angle to inter-jet plane
12
0 rad rad
Same W
1
2
closest jet other W
-angle for energy-angle for energy
Energ
y
(arb
itr.
)
all EFs
Adding momentum of all energy flows inside the cone (R=0.75)
MC standardData
angle (rad)
B) Jet propertiesB) Jet properties
Energy of the jets (GeV)
Durham
Cone
MC standardMC skiData
Azimuthal angleAzimuthal angle
Azimutal angle of the jets (rad)
Durham
Cone
MC standardMC skiData
Jets massJets mass
Jet mass (GeV)
Durham
Cone
MC standardMC skiData
C) Effect of cones: C) Effect of cones: momentum momentum kickkick
ppdur
pcon
e
p (GeV)
(rad)
MC standardMC skiData
… … zoom on zoom on kickskicks......
p (GeV)
(rad)
MC standardMC skiData
On ZsOn Zs
p (GeV)
(rad)
ppdur
pcon
e
MC standard
Data
Herwig
On ZsOn Zs
p (GeV)
(rad)
ppdur
pcon
e
MC standard
Data
Herwig
Angular bias Angular bias (on Z events)(on Z events)
Durham
R (rad)
R (rad)
Durham
Photons to charged:
All neutral to charged:
MC standard
Data
Angle between two components within a jet:
ConclusionsConclusions
The cone analysis:The cone analysis:– Reduces total mReduces total mWW error error
– Reduces strongly CR systematic yielding a more robust analysisReduces strongly CR systematic yielding a more robust analysis
No evidence for additional systematics from:No evidence for additional systematics from:– Jetset vs HerwigJetset vs Herwig
– Semi-leptonic testSemi-leptonic test
– Hadronic Ws and on ZsHadronic Ws and on Zs
Plans: fine tuning of R & more MC Models (Ariadne)Plans: fine tuning of R & more MC Models (Ariadne)