Process Safety Kpi
-
Upload
arthurgroot -
Category
Business
-
view
9.104 -
download
8
Transcript of Process Safety Kpi
04 februari 2014
Methodology and key-elements Identification and monitoring KPI’s
Bottom-up approach Direct connection between
safety management system and risks
Compliance with legislation (Seveso II), HSG 254 methodology and CCPS
Identification of relevant KPI’-s process safety by using BowTie- methodology
Dedicated Bow-Tie software
Mandate and commitment Training programs ISO 31000 Approach in 4 phases
Plant en site management
C-level
BU-level
04 februari 2014
Approach in 4 phases to determine the KPI’s for process safety
1. Identification and scoping (setting up BowTie’s)
2. Analysis of barriers and selection of KPI’s (leading and lagging)
3. Set-up criteria and reporting of KPI’s4. Evaluation and review
04 februari 2014
Phase 1: identification Setting-up BowTie’s in 12 steps at operational installation
level by using the following reports: HAZOP/HAZID’s Safety reports (Seveso II) SIL/LOPA assesments FMECA analysis
Result: a set of barriers including escalation factor control
04 februari 2014
Phase 2, Key Performance Indicators
Starting point: “You don’t improve what you don’t measure”
Indicators: Leading indicators: “performance of barriers before the
consequence” Lagging indicators: “number of near misses or the
consequences itself”
04 februari 2014
Phase 2, analysis of barriers and selection of KPI’s
Selection of KPI’s, leading (barriers), max. 1 per threat or consequence line and lagging (consequences)
Connecting barriers (KPI’s) to business model (safety management system)
04 februari 2014
Phase 3, Set-up criteria and reporting of KPI’s
Setting up PR (performance requirements) for the KPI’s,. the FISM (Functionality, Integrity, Survivability and Management) methodology
Setting-up PS (performance standards) for (KPI’s) defining grades, scoring and assessment criteria
04 februari 2014
Performance requirements
Functionality definition the expected task(s)
Integrity definition of the reliability of the barrier
Survivability describes the barrier during an incident
Management description of the processes, activities, procedures, competences
to control the barrier
04 februari 2014
Performance standard
Grades, scoring methods & assessment criteria
Very Good Good Moderate Bad Very Bad
Effectiveness of barrier Performance criteria Design Integrity Operational
Condition of barrier is very bad i.e procedure not updated last 4 years
Not audited on performance Not trained operators
Condition of barrier is bad i.e. procedure not updated last 2 years
Not audited in the last year
Operator trained not in last 2 years
Condition of barrier is moderate i.e.producedure Not audited this year
Operators trained last year
Condition of barrier is good Etc.Etc. Etc.
Condition of barrier is very good Etc.Etc. Etc.
04 februari 2014
Phase 3, integration ofKey Performance Indicators
Generic KPI’s related to management systems Percentage of completed HSE audits Implementation of lesson learned TRIPOD investigations
(progress) Validation of procedures for operational and maintenance tasks
(progress is parameter) Percentage of underperforming operational documents noticed
during (HSE) audits Job-specific trained personal (percentage) Etc.
04 februari 2014
Related to technical integrity Percentage of completed tests according to schedule (software,
safety relief valves, pressurized tanks, fire fighting equipment, etc.)
Combination of completed test and percentage of tested equipment that pass/fail the test
Status of follow-up actions from risk analyses such as HAZOP’s; Number of risk analyses executed according to schedule
(HAZOP, SIL, LOPA, etc.) Number of (un)controled releases/emissions/spills Etc.
Phase 3, integration Performance Indicators process safety
04 februari 2014
Phase 4, Start reporting, evaluationand review
Starting with risk optimization Starting improvement cycle (Plan, Do, Check, Act cycle) Transparency check Integrating incident data for risk management
04 februari 2014
Phase 4, ‘live’ data of the (HSE) management system into the Bow-Tie
Management System
04 februari 2014
Phase 4: reporting levels process safety
Summary of CCPS standard (based on information form BowTie level)
Summary level from BowTie level, e.g. CCPS examples (based on information form BowTie level)
BowTie LevelPlant en site management
C-level
BU-level
04 februari 2014
Conclusions KPI’s
Bottom-up approach Identification of relevant KPI’-s (process) safety by using
BowTie- methodology Compliance with (HSE) legislation. i.e. (Seveso II), HSG
254 methodology (HSE) and meets criteria set by CCPS
04 februari 2014
Policy and strategy•Development of Environment & Safety Policy•Corporate Environment Plan• Stakeholder Analysis•Carbon Capture and Storage•REACH and GHS•Corporate Social Responsibility•Carbon Trading•Policy on the Prevention of Serious Accidents•Energy
Organization and processes•Environmental Management Systems• Safety Management Systems•Occupational Health Management Systems•HSE Risk Management• Interim HSE Management•Training and Coaching•Environmental and Sustainability Reporting•Process safety management
Culture• SHWE growth model (based
on Hearts and Minds)• Safety culture scan• Incident analysis (TRIPOD)•Management system audits•Compliance Audits
Compliance•Environmental impact
assessment (EIA)•Environmental permitting• Safety Report• Fire Report•QRA/external Safety•EIA•Emission studies•Noise/odor dispersion studies• IPPC studies
HSE engineering• Safety Case•HAZID and HAZOP•ENVID• Fire Protection Analyses•QRA, IRPA•Technical Safety Review•Process Hazard Analysis •Hazard Consequence Modeling •Asset integrity studies (SIL, IPF
and LOPA)•Reliability, Availability &
Maintainability Studies (RAMS)• FME(C)A studies•BowTie Risk Analyses•Escape, Evacuation &
Rescue Analysis (EERA)
Services Royal HaskoningDHV