PROCEEDINGS AISTEEL 2017aisteel2017.unimed.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/150-153.pdf · Assoc....

THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIPnd2 AND

AISTEEL

Supported and Coordinated by:

Post Graduate SchoolState University of Medan North Sumatera, Indonesia

Organized by:

Indexing By

PROCEEDINGS

Ball Room Grand Mercure Hotel, Medan - Indonesia

16-17 October 2017

ISSN: 2548 - 4613ISSN: 2548 - 4613ISSN: 2548 - 4613Vol. 2, December 2017Vol. 2, December 2017Vol. 2, December 2017

Educa�onal Research to Endorse Produc�ve and thInnova�ve Genera�on in the 21 Century

2017

9 772548 461 001

Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)

eISSN: 2548-4613

i

Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative

Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2017)

“Educational Research to Endorse Productive and Innovation Generation in The 21th Century”

Grand Mercure Hotel, Medan City, North Sumatera, Indonesia

October 16-17, 2017

Editorial Board

Editorial-in-Chief

Dr. Juniastel Rajagukguk, M.Si (State University of Medan, Unimed)

Deputy Editor

Dr. Saronom Silaban, M.Pd (State University of Medan, Unimed)

International Advisory Board / Scientific Committee

Prof. Dr. Kala Saravanamuthu (University of Newcastle, Australia)

Prof. Arjen EJ Wals (University of Gothenburg, Sweden)

Prof. Dr. Bornok Sinaga, M.Pd (Unimed, Indonesia)

Prof. Dr. Aytekin Isman (Sakarya University, Turkey)

Prof. Peter Charles Taylor, Ph.D., Med., B.Sc., Dip.Ed (Murdoch University, Australia)

Prof. Dr. Mukhlas Samani, Ph.D (Indonesia)

Prof. Dr. Jailani bin Md. Yunos (University Tun Hussein on Malaysia)

Prof. Dr. Nurahimah Mohd. Yusuf (UTM, Malaysia)

Assoc. Prof. Dr Pedro Isaias (University of Queensland, Australia)

Assoc. Prof. Elisabeth Taylor, Ph.D (Murdoch University, Australia)

Dr. Bambang Sumintono, M.Ed (Universiti Malaya, Malaysia)

Dr. Isma Widyaty, M.Pd (UPI, Indonesia)

Prof. Dr. Syahrul R, M.Pd (UNP, Indonesia)

Prof. Amrin Saragih, MA., Ph.D (Unimed, Indonesia)

Assoc. Prof. Ade Gafar Abdullah, M.Si (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)

Eng. Asep Bayu Dani Nandiyanto (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)

Prof. Dr. Hartono, M.Pd (Universitas Negeri Semarang)

Please cite the proceeding as “Proceeding of the First Annual International Seminar on Transformative

Education and Educational Leadership Vol. 2” with the following abbreviation: Proc. Aist., 2


eISSN: 2548-4613

ii

Preface

The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL with

web link is http://aisteel2017.unimed.ac.id/) was held on October 16 -17, 2017 in Medan City, Indonesia. This

conference was organized by Postgraduate School, State University of Medan (Unimed) and is the routine agenda at

Unimed now. The Second Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership‟

is realized this year with various presenters, researchers, lecturers and students from universties both in and out of

North Sumatera participate in the theme of which is “Educational Research to Endorse Productive and Innovative

Generation in the 21st Century.”

2nd AISTEEL is the annual international seminar with main aim is to discuss of recent research special for

Transformative Education and Education Leadership. Several topics like: Teachers Education Model, Research

Global Issue in Education, Mathematics and Science Education, Social, Languange Education, Vocational

Education, Curriculum, Economic, History and Management Education have been discussed at the 2nd AISTEEL

2017. 2nd AISTEEL international seminar provided experts‟ view on transformative education and educational

leadership as well as curriculum article presentation. There were five keynote speakers have been came Professor

Keiichiro Yoshinaga, Dr. Bambang Sumintono, Dr. Sitti Maesuri Patahuddin, and Dr. Yulia Rahmawaty. The

organizer had been use online submission system to receive all abstract, full paper and also communication with

authors. All of information include with comment of reviewer can be cheked real time by author.

Chairperson

Dr. Rahmad Husein, M.Ed


eISSN: 2548-4613

iii

Welcoming Speech of Director of Postgraduate School State University of Medan

The Second Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership

(AISTEEL)

The honorable,

- Rector of State University of Medan, Prof. Dr. Syawal Gultom, M.Pd.

- Vice Rectors of UNIMED

- Professor Keiichiro Yoshinaga, PhD, Institute of Liberal Arts and Science, Kanazawa University – Japan

- Dr. Bambang Sumintono, M.Ed., University Malaya – Malaysia

- Dr. Sitti Maesuri Patahuddin, Faculty of Education, Science, Technology and Mathematics, University of

Canberra – Australia

- Yuli Rahmawati, Chemistry Education Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

- Deans of Faculties of Education, Languages and Arts, Social Sciences, Natural Sciences and Mathematics,

Engineering, Sports Sciences, and Economics

- Vice Directors of Postgraduate School of UNIMED

- All speakers, lecturers, researchers, students, and participants

Good Morning

Welcome the honorable guests speakers Professor Keiichiro Yoshinaga, Dr. Bambang Sumintono, Dr. Sitti Maesuri

Patahuddin, Assoc. Prof. Emilia Zulmira de FAN, and other speakers, lecturers and students from outside and inside

Unimed to this international seminar which is the routine agenda at Postgraduate program of Unimed now. I‟m glad

that „The Second Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership‟ is

realized this year with various presenters, lecturers and students from universties both in and out of North Sumatera.

and participate in the theme of which is “Educational Research to Endorse Productive and Innovative Generation in

the 21st Century.”

Ladies and Gentlemen,

In this second seminar exels the first one related to the administration by online and the publication index by either

Thomson Reuters or Google Schoolar. By the new policy on student‟s publication, postgraduate program really

matches the system, particularly for the students who will sit in the oral defence examination. Through the seminar,

the postgraduate students improve their article journal writing and it is proved by many articles are submitted by the

students.

The plenary speakers coming from 15 provinces in Indonesia will present topics covering multi disciplines. They

will contribute a lot of inspiring inputs and new knowledge on current trending educational research topics all over

the world. The expectation is that all potential lecturers will share their research findings to educational scientists

and researchers as well for improving their teaching process and quality. Thus, this will contribute to the next young

generation researchers to produce innovative research findings in education and educational leadership contexts.

This second seminar continues the promotion of the first sequel „Developing Future Teachers‟ Education Model.

Therefore, the propose of this second seminar on the transformative education and educational leadership research

will trigger the young professional lecturers and educators to compete in the invention of inovative educational

teaching and learning strategies, techniques and leadership.

I hope that the scientific attitude and skills through research will promote Unimed to be a well-known university

which persists to be developed and excelled in the future.

Thank you the Rector of Unimed who always supports us in organizing the seminar. Thank you all guest and plenary

speakers. Special thanks to both steering and organizing committee who have well-coordinated and colaborated in

actualizing the seminar.

Director of Postgraduate Unimed

Prof. Dr. Bornok Sinaga, M.Pd


eISSN: 2548-4613

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PP The Effect of Using Collaborative Learning Strategy on The Student’s Achievement in Writing

Descriptive Text ................................................................................................................................................ Nursyah Handayani

1

The Development of Multicultural Based Teaching Materials on the Observation Report Text for

Senior High School Student.............................................................................................................................. Nurhasanah Permata Sari Sembiring, Khairil Ansari, Mutsyuhito Solin

5

The Power Behind Advertisement.................................................................................................................... Endang Larasati

10

The Effect of Using Audio Visual Media on Student’s Vocabulary Mastery .............................................. Resti Citra Dewi

13

Ideational Taxonomic Relation of Hata Pangupa in Tapanuli Selatan Wedding Ceremony..................... Mutia Nasution

17

Pal’s Leadership Style and Teacher’s Performance of Islamic Junior High State School (MTsN)

Hamparan Perak Deliserdang Distric.............................................................................................................. Nurmala, Maria Ulfah Handayani, Denny Khairani, Desi Prawita

21

The Influence of Work Motivation on Teacher’s Job Performance of Vocational High School in

Medan................................................................................................................................................................ Darmawati, Sri Melfayetti, Selamat Triono Ahmad

24

Error Analysis by Using Tenses of Senior High School ................................................................................ Hariyanto

28

The Traditional Custom and Ceremonial Tradition in Suku Anak Dalam Language............................... Putri Ayu Lestari

32

The Impact of Internet Marketing on Success of Women Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

Innovation as Intervening Variable................................................................................................................. Fivi Rahmatus Sofiyah, Ami Dilham

36

The Effect of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Technique on Students

Reading Comprehension .................................................................................................................................. Linda Efrina Nasution

40

Translation Shifts in Translating Didong from Gayonese in to Bahasa Indonesia..................................... Wike Yurida

44

The Effect of Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Strategy on Student’s Reading

Comprehension.................................................................................................................................................. Khairuni Syafitri

48

The Effect of Organizational Culture on Working Disciplines of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Head Master in

Deliserdang......................................................................................................................................................... Muhammad Rifa’i, Syafaruddin Siahaan, Siman Nurhadi

53

Student’s Achievement on Reading Comprehension in Narrative Text by Using Think Pair Share

Technique (TPS) at SMPN 1 Lubuk Pakam................................................................................................... Eprima Lestari Hutabarat

58

Ideational Taxonomic Relations of Hobar on Parpokatan Orja of South Tapanuli................................... Novria Grahmayanuri

63

The Effect of Using Task Based Learning Method on the Student’s Achievement in Reading

Comprehension.................................................................................................................................................. Nilam Ulami Siregar

69

Relationship of Initiation Structure and Consideration with Effectiveness Leadersship........................... Wanti Simanjuntak, Syaiful Sagala

72

The Effect of Storytelling Method on Students Writing Narrative Text Ability at the Eleventh Grade

Students of MAN Panyabungan....................................................................................................................... Armita Novriana Rambe

77


eISSN: 2548-4613

v

The Implementation of Curriculum 2013 in Vocational High School 4 Takengon..................................... Zainal Arifin, Herbert C.B. Manalu, Rini Deliana, Fitri Ariyanti

80

The Difference of Mathematical Problem Solving Ability by Using Student Teams Achievement

Division (STAD) and Direct Instruction on System Linear Equation Two Variable in Grade VIII

SMP Negeri 11 Medan....................................................................................................................................... Faradilla Bafaqih, Cecep Nandar

84

The Influence of Problem-Based Learning and Every One is A Teacher Here Models on Higher

Order Thingking Skills in Environmental Pollution Topics.......................................................................... Kurnia Putra, Hasruddin, Ahmad Rafiqi Tantawi

89

The Effect of Appliying Task Based Learning (TBL) Approach on The Student’s Ability in Writing

Descriptive Paragraph....................................................................................................................................... Vijay Khana

94

Teacher’s Language Style in English Course Class........................................................................................ Dyan Yosephin Hutagalung

98

Differences Between Students Mark Taught With Co-Operative Learning Model Type TGT With

Guess The Words Media Compared With Students Mark Taught With Co-Operative Learning

Models With Words Square Media in Hydrocarbon Subject....................................................................... Hariani Siregar, Gulmah Sugiharti

101

Language Used by Male and Female of Darul Ilmi Murni............................................................................ Syukri Hidayati

107

The Use of Journal Writing in Improving Student’s Writing Skill of Recount Text.................................. Muhammad Ilham Adha

110

Teacher and Student Perceptions Toward Practical Implementation Obstacles at Learning Chemistry Sepra Pajar, Ramlan Silaban, Zainuddin Muchtar

114

The Analysis of of the Implementation and Problems of Lab Work on Chemistry Learning................... Elvira Lastri, Iis Siti Jahro, Marham Sitorus

120

The Implementation of Using Library Card and ICT Based Library Service Systemin Increasing

Reading Interest of Primary School Students at Tanjung Gading of Batu Bara Regency ........................ Suci Amalia, Asih Menanti

125

Project Based Learning Tools Development on Alcohol and Ether Materials at Natural Science

Faculty State University of Medan................................................................................................................... Nadia Armina Ramud, Jamalum Purba

132

The Development of Teaching Material to Write Explanation Text Based on Mind Map......................... Pienti Mala Ningsih Manalu, Biner Ambarita, Rosmawaty Harahap

138

Improvement of Student Learning Outcome Using Model of Collaborative Based Lesson Study with

Student’s Worksheet on Materials Hydrolisis................................................................................................ Agus Muliaman, Laila Majnun Hutagaol

141

The Application of Comic Learning Media to Improve Student’s Achievement on Reduction and

Oxidation Reaction Topic................................................................................................................................. Anggi Desviana Siregar, Rini, Herdini

146

The Application of Cooperative Learning Round Robin to Improves Student Learning Achievement

on the Subject of Electrolyte-Nonelectrolyte and Redoxin Class X SMAN 1 Seberida.............................. Nora Santi, Betty Holiwarni, Johni Azmi

150

The Effect of Combination Cooperative Learning Models Toward Learning Result................................ Sapnita Idamarna Daulay

154

The Maintenance of Hokkien Among Chinese Speakers in Stabat............................................................... Widya Ningsih

159

Effect of Blended Learning Model and Learning Style to Civic Education Learning Results in Class

VII in Junior High School Panca Budi Medan............................................................................................... Madina Qudsia Lubis, Reh Bungana Br.Perangin-angin, Mursid

164

EFL Student’s Uses of Um as Fillers in Speaking........................................................................................... Eka Riana

169


eISSN: 2548-4613

vi

The Influence of Role Playing Method and Self Concept of Social Skills of 5-6 Years Old Child............. Rabitah Hanum Hasibuan, Anita Yus, Yusnadi

172

The Effect of Learning Approach and Personality Type Towards Learning Outcomes............................ Dwhy Dinda Sari, Julaga Situmorang, Busmin Gurning

178

The Effect of Learning Models and Critical Thingking Skills on Social Science Learning Outcomes..... Juriah Siregar, Julaga Situmorang, Baharuddin

183

The Effect of Suggestopedia Method on Student’s Achievement in Vocabulary........................................ Heppy Yersin Digita Purba

188

Application of Active Learning Strategy Type Everyone is A Teacher Here (ETH) to Increase Student

Activity and Leraning Outcomes in Chemistry on Salt Hydrolysis.............................................................. Wilta Fajrina, Darra Utari Ningsih, Sri Adelila Sari, Habibati

193

The Effect of Learning Strategy and Type of Personality on Student’s Achievement in Economic

Science................................................................................................................................................................. Dewi Shara Dalimunthe

198

Development of Learning Tools Based on Realistic Mathematics Education of Ethnomatematics

Nuances to Improve Mathematical Communication Skill Students in Junior High School 2 Percut

Seituan................................................................................................................................................................. Rizqi Jamiah, Edi Syahputra, Kms. M. Amin Fauzi

202

The Impact of Cooperative Learning Strategy and Learning Interest Toward the Learning Result of

Second Year of Senior High School Students in 2016/2017........................................................................... Riswan Sianturi, Abdul Muin Sibuea, Edward Purba

208

The Development of Flash Program as a Media of Chemistry Learning on Chemical Equilibrium........ Lenni Khotimah Harahap, Albinus Silalahi, Iis Siti Jahro

210

The Ethnic Mandailing Tradition of Courtship (Markusip) and Revitalization Efforts in the

Formation of the Character Youth.................................................................................................................. Riadi Syafutra Siregar, Ratih Baiduri, Robert Sibarani

214

The Effect of Education on Unemployment Rate in Indonesia..................................................................... Rahmat Putra Ahmad Hasibuan, Dede Ruslan, Fitrawaty

218

Development of Explanatory Text Materials Based on Problem Solving in Senior High School

Pematangsiantar................................................................................................................................................ Tiarma Nova Intan Malasari, Biner Ambarita, Malan Lubis

222

Learning Model of Strengthening Vocational Life Skills With Enterpreneurship Knowledge to

Improve Student Learning Outcomes.............................................................................................................. Husni Wardi Tanjung

226

A Critical Discourse Analysis Wardah Halal Beauty Advertisements......................................................... Ayu Lestari Siregar, Mei Lastri E.F. Butar-Butar

229

Influence of Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Mathematics Leraning Model to Mathematical Problem

Solving and Self Efficacy Students of SMA Negeri 3 Binjai.......................................................................... Nurcahaya Hutasoit, Martua Manullang, Ani Minarni

232

Differences in Mathematics Problems Solving Students With Implementing Learning Model Think

Pair Square and Group Investigation in Junior High Schools...................................................................... Abdul Halim, Edy Surya

236

The Acquisition of Nouns and Verbs of Mandailingnese by Two-Year-Old Mandailing Children.......... Marwah, Amrin Saragih, Sri Minda Murni

240

Utilization of ICT Learning in Senior High School Teladan Medan............................................................ Tengku Salwa Miranti

244

The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Based Interactive Media and Interpersonal

Communication on Student’s Achievement.................................................................................................... Catur Ayu Wulandari, Efendi Napitupulu, Keysar Panjaitan

248

Developing of Learning Material Based on Problem Based Learning to Increase Student’s

Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Self-Efficacy in Grade X SMA Negeri 1 Medan.............................. Anggi Paramita Daulay, Dian Armanto, Waminton R

253


eISSN: 2548-4613

vii

Efforts to in Crease A Motivation to Learning Math Using “Program” Learning Model......................... Linda Sari, Edi Syahputra

257

The Eford of Improving Mathematics Learning Outcome on Quadrilateral and Triangle Matter by

Using Gradually Exsercise Strategy with The Assistance of Image Media.................................................. Ady Putra, KMS. Muhammad Amin Fauzi, Yulita Moliq

261

The Difference on Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability Between Realistic Approach

with Conventional in The State Madrasah Tsanawiyah 2 of Medan............................................................ Siska Lestari, Zul Amry, Hasratuddin

264

Developing Learning Materials Using Realistic Mathematics Education to Increase Junior High

School Students’ Mathematical Disposition and Connection Ability........................................................... Syu’aida Hazar Nasution, Izwita Dewi, E.Elvis Napitupulu

269

Developing Learning Materials Using Problem Based Learning to Increase Senior High School

Student’s Mathematical Disposition and Representation Ability................................................................. Dewi Khairani, Mulyono, Izwita Dewi

275

The Effect of Question Students Have Strategy on The Result of Students Learning in Mathematics.... Yuliani Aruan, Edi Syahputra

281

Analysis of Academic Supervision Competence and Managerial Supervision in Improving the

Performance of Vocational High School Supervisors in Langsa City.......................................................... Muhammad Hendra, Saut Purba, Mian Siahaan

284

The Use in Active Learning Strategy of Learning Starts with a Question Type in the Mathematics

Learning.............................................................................................................................................................. Jeni Putria Efil, Ani Minami, Pardomuan Sitompul

289

Improving the Ability to Learn Math by Using Rubu’ al-Mujayyab Media................................................. Muhammad Hidayat, Edi Syahputra, E.Elvis Napitupulu

293

The Impact of Education Cost and Government Spending the Interest Rate of Bank Indonesia

Subtitle................................................................................................................................................................ Julika Rahma Siagian, Dede Ruslan, Arwansyah

297

The Implementation of Problem Based Learning Models to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving

Ability of Students on Arithmethic Materials in Class VII Junior High School......................................... Elidar Tanjung, Izwita Dewi, Mulyono

301

The Effect of Learning Strategies to Trial By Jury in Participationt Mathematics Learning Student of

Junior High School............................................................................................................................................ Rizka Putri Rahayu, Ani Minami, Zul Amry

305

The Differences Between The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Learning Approach to Conventional

Learning with The Students Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Junior High School of 38 Medan

Grade VII............................................................................................................................................................ Diah Ari Saputri, Syafari

309

The Effect of Value National Exam Standards at Learning Achievement of Students at Senior High

School.................................................................................................................................................................. Nurdiana Fahmi, Bornok Sinaga, W. Rajagukguk

312

The Effect of Open Unemployment Rate and Level of Vocational High Education to Poverty in North

Sumatera Province............................................................................................................................................. Zulaili, Indra Maipita

315

The Application of Cooperative Learning of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) Type to Increase the Students’

Ability of Problem-Solving................................................................................................................................ Mudriqah Fadhilah Siregar, Zul Amry, Syafari

320

The Relationship Between Metacognitive With the Results of Learning Outcomes on the Fungi Topic.. Elizabeth, Herbert Sipahutar, Syahmi Edi

324

Comparison of DNA Isolation Methods from Economically Valuable Plants in Indonesia....................... Chairiyani Rizka, Fauziyah Harahap, Syahmi Edi

327

Development of Learning Device Based on Realistic Approach to Improve Problem Solving Ability

Mathematic of Student at Junior High School................................................................................................ Susanna Romaria Harahap

333


eISSN: 2548-4613

viii

Efforts to Improve Understanding and Use Concept of Additive Fractions and Reduction Using

Media Comics on Model Cooperative Learning Type Student Team Achievement Division (STAD)...... Ratu Natalia Perangin-angin, Sahat Siahaan

339

The Effect of Cooperative Learning Type Games Teams Tournament (TGT) of Mathematics

Learning Outcomes in the Fractions Matter................................................................................................... Ansori Hasibuan, Asmin Panjaitan, Asrin Lubis

342

Development of Authentic Mathematics Assessment in Application of Problem Based Learning Model

to Improve Problem Solving Ability and Understanding of Student Mathematics Concept at

Namorambe Secondary Private Middle School Junior High........................................................................ Kartika Sari, Asmin, Bornok Sinaga

347

The Increasing of Student’s Mathematics Problem Solving Ability and Learning Motivation Through

Problem Based Learning Model....................................................................................................................... Ridha Maulida

351

Dialect of Bataknese Language Used by Senior High School Students’....................................................... Rafika Nur Rahman

358

The Effectiveness of Tandur Method of Improving Students’ Learning Ability in Junior High School.. Rahimatul Islam Elmujahidah, Mulyono, H. Banjarnahor

362

The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Approach to Student Achievement on Ecosystem Topic in Junior

High School......................................................................................................................................................... Nilawati, Nurtika Dewi

365

Improvement of Student Learning Result by Using Cooperative Learning Model of Teams Games

Tournament Type on Algebra Fuction Limit.................................................................................................................. Rismalyah Manalu, E.Elvis Napitupulu, Martua Manullang

367

Noun Phrase of Culture Articles in The Jakarta Post.................................................................................... Misdiana

371

Application of Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share for Improved Communication...... Nurhasanah

374

Implementation Model of School Policy in Constructing Behavior of Troubled Students......................... Khairtati Purnama Nasution, H. Syaiful Sagala

378

Efforts to Improving Creativity and Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Students With SPLET

Strategy............................................................................................................................................................... Antoni

382

The Influence of Physical Education in Establishment of Self Esteem......................................................... Yustinus Tarigan, Tarsyat Nugraha

386

The Improvement of Dance Art Learning Achievement for Deaf Students Through Total

Communication Application (Gesture/Signal) in Sekolah Luar Biasa (SLB) - E Negeri Pembina

Tingkat Provinsi Sumatera Utara.................................................................................................................... Siti Maryam

390

Innovation of Media Video Compact Disc Instructional Pencak Silat for High School............................. Marli Perangin-angin, Imran Akhmad, Agung Sunarno

393

Achievement Strategy of the Indonesian National Qualification Framework Based Curriculum

Generic Description of Sport Education Postgraduate Program Universitas Negeri Medan.................... Muhammad Supriadi Siregar, Nurhayati Simatupang, Albadi Sinulingga

397

The Effect of Teaching Styles and Motor Ability as The Result of Study Dribbling Football................... Muhammad Fajar Doli Siregar

401

Semantic Analysis of English Loan Words in Indonesian Electronic Paper (Analisa)............................... Putri Nurul Rahmadani Siregar

404

Analysis of Empowerment of Competence Sinergity on Optimization of Education System.................... Rameyanti Tampubolon

408

Inquiry-Based Video Learning Media For Overcoming Student Learning Difficulty (Case Study at

State Junior High School 3 Lubuk Pakam Deliserdang District)................................................................. Megawati

412


eISSN: 2548-4613

ix

The Develpoment of Mathematics learning Tool Oriented on Problem Based Learning to Enhance

Mathematics Problem Solving Ability and Self Efficacy............................................................................... Solawati Nainggolan, Mulyono, Hasratuddin

416

The Effectiveness of Contextual Inquiry-Based Worksheet on the Matter of Fungi on Food Towards

Students’ Higher-Order Thinking and Science Process Skills of Biology Education................................. Nurjamiah Siregar, Hasruddin, Syahmi Edi

422

The Function of Limits Mastery on Mathematics Learning Achievement in Derivative Subject at the

Eleventh Grade of Madrasah Aliyah Yayasan Pendidikan Karya Setia Padangsidimpuan...................... Hasna Dewi Ritonga

426

Effect of Education Level, Income, Inflation on Community Consumption Pattern in North Sumatera

Province.............................................................................................................................................................. Nelly Hutajulu, Fitrawaty, M.Fitri Rahmadana

431

Application of Problem Based Learning Model Assisted by Cabri Software to Improve Problem

Solving Ability of Mathematics Students.........................................................................................................

Ahmad Darmawan, Edi Syahputra, Kms. M. Amin Fauzi

437

Optimization of Academic Supervision Competence of High School Supervisor in Karo Regency with

Critical Events Model (CEM)........................................................................................................................... Karyawan Keliat, Yasaratodo Wau, Irsan

441

The Concept of Physics Learning Media Based Computer Animation........................................................ Ratna Tanjung, Mukhtar, Efendi Napitupulu

446

Cultivating Children’s Critical Attitude with Educational Philosophy....................................................... Daulat Saragi

451


eISSN: 2548-4613

150

The Application of Cooperative Learning Round

Robin to Improves Student LearningAchievement on

the Subject of Electrolyte-Nonelectrolyteand

Redoxin Class X SMAN 1 Seberida

Nora Santi

Department of Education Chemistry

State University of Medan

Medan, Indonesia

Corresponding email: [email protected]

Betty Holiwarni


University of Riau

Riau, Indonesia

[email protected]

JohniAzmi


University of Riau

Riau,Indonesia

[email protected]

Abstract -Research onthe application of cooperative learning

model Round Robin has been conducted to improve student

learning achievement on the topic electrolyte- nonelectrolyte and

redox at class XSMAN 1 Seberida. This research is experimental

research with randomized control group pretest-posttest design.

The sample took in the 10 Maret – 24 April 2013. The sample

consisted of two classes, X3 classas experimental

classandX1classas control class. Experimental class is a class that

is used cooperative learning model Round Robin, while the

control class was not. Data analysis technique used is the t-test.

Based on analysis of data obtained tarithmetic>ttableis 3.43 > 1.67,

means that the cooperative learning model Round Robin can

improve student achievement on the subject of reaction rate in

class X SMAN 1 Seberida where the effect of an increase is 15.96

Keywords: cooperative learning, round robin, learning

achievement, electrolyte- nonelectrolyte and redox

I. INTRODUCTION

Learning is a process by which a person undertakes a

whole new behavioral change as a result of his own

experience in interaction with his environment [6]. The

presence of teachers in the teaching and learning process still

plays an important role [8]. As an educator who is directly

involved in the implementation of learning, teachers should

be able to choose and apply the right way of learning. If the

teacher succeeds in creating an atmosphere that causes

students to be actively motivated in learning, it will allow for

increased learning outcomes. For learning in schools, students

are exposed to a number of subjects, one of them chemistry

subjects.

Chemistry is part of the Natural Science (IPA) that is

taught at the secondary school to college level. Chemistry is

the study of the structure, structure, properties, and changes in

matter and energy that accompany material changes. In

chemistry subjects, students study various topics such as

Electrolyte-Nonelectrolyte and Redox Reaction. This subject

is the subject of memorization, understanding and calculation

so that the necessary way for students to learn actively and

easily understand the material provided by the teacher.

Information obtained from chemistry teacher class X

SMAN 1 Seberida, there are still many students who have

difficulty learning on the subject Electrolyte-nonelectrolyte

and Redox Reaction. This can be seen from the average value

of students on the subject Electrolyte-nonelectrolyte and

Redox Reactions 2012/2013 academic year that has not met

the Minimum Exhaustiveness Criteria (KKM). Teachers

informed that on the learning of chemistry in class X SMAN

1 Seberida academic year 2012/2013, teachers have attempted

some learning method, but in the learning process not all

students are actively involved. If students are given practice

questions and asked to go forward to complete it, students

who often forward only certain students while the other

students just want to wait for answers from friends. The

interaction between teachers and students is dominated by

mailto:[email protected]


eISSN: 2548-4613

151

these students, so not all students can be active in the learning

process [3].

Efforts that can be done to improve student motivation

and activeness One of them is by applying the appropriate

learning model. Learning model is a planning or a pattern

used as a guide in implementing the learning process [9]. The

use of a new learning model can also provide a new

atmosphere during the learning process so that students

become more motivated.

A teacher should seek active students in the learning

process, In order for student learning outcomes are

satisfactory. Teachers are expected to be able to choose how

to teach so that students can activate. Learning model is

expected to improve student activeness one of them is

cooperative learning model Round Robin type.

Cooperative learning is a learning where students study in

small groups collaboratively consist of 4-6 people with

heterogeneous group structure. One of the stages in

cooperative learning is the appreciation given to the group

based on the contribution of the individual student evaluation

value so that each student will have a sense of responsibility

towards the group[5]. While round robin is a model of

cooperative learning that teaches students how to wait their

turn while working in groups. Learning activities designed in

the round robin learning model enable students to be more

active, creative, responsible, cooperative, healthy competition

and learning engagement [1].The round robin steps according

to [1] are as follows:

1).The teacher presents the material to be taught in a broad

outline;

2). Students are grouped in groups of 4-6 students;

3). Students sit around in a circle;

4). The teacher asks a question in the form of a double-

answer piece or a topic that can be used in brainstorming

5). The teacher sets the timer (Timer, stopwatch) according to

the agreed time, for example10 seconds for each student

and 2 minutes for the whole team (depending on the

likelihood of short length of answer, as well as the

difficulty level of the teacher)

6). Students sitting around the table write answers in turns

according to the time provided;

7). The student continues the brainstorming until the time

devoted to the question is exhausted;

8) The teacher together with the student summed up the

overall learning material that had been studied.

II. METHODS

The study was conducted at SMAN 1 Seberida in X class

of semester of the academic year 2012/2013 on March 10 -

April 24, 2013. The population in the study were the students

of class X SMAN 1 Seberidasemester of the academic year

2012/2013 consisting of 4 classes taught by one chemistry

subject teacher. Samples were taken two homogeneous

classes, then determined by experiment class and control class

by drawing, then got class X3 as experiment class and class

X1 as control class.

The study used the Randomized control group pretest-

posttest design. The study design according to [4], can be

seen in table 1.

Table 1. Research design

Class Pretest Treatment Posttest

Experiment T0 X T1

Control T0 - T1

Information:

X :Treatment of the experimental class

T0:The pretest grade of the experiment class and the control

class.

T1: The value of the experimental class posttest and the

control class

Technique of collecting data in research is test technique.

The data collected were obtained from: (1) Pretest, performed

in both classes before learning the subjects of electrolytes-

nonelectrolyte and redox reactions, (2) Posttest, given in both

classes after study of redox reactions. While the data analysis

technique used in the study is t-test. T-test statistics can be

performed based on the criteria of normally distributed data.

Therefore, before the data processing, firstly tested the

normality using Liliefors test. If Lmax price <Ltable, then the

data is normally distributed. Ltabel Price obtained by

formulation[6]:

L =

After the data is normally distributed, then the

homogeneity test is done by testing the variance of both

samples (homogeneous or not) first, by the formula:

F =

The pretest of each sample class is used for hypothesis

testing. Hypothesis in this research is the application of

cooperative learning model type Quick On The Draw can

improve student achievement on redoks subject in class X

SMAN 1 Seberida. Then t-test is done to test the hypothesis,

with the following formula [7]:

t = dengan =

By the criteria of hypothesis testing the research is

accepted if tcount>ttable where ttableobtained from the list of

distribution t with dk = n1 + n2 - 2 with the real level α = 0.05.

the effect of student achievement improvement is shown by

the following formula:


eISSN: 2548-4613

152

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Results of Data Processing Analysis

The results of data analysis research will be described is

the result of normality test data analysis, the results of

homogeneity test data analysis, the results of hypothesis test

data analysis and the results of improved analysis of learning

achievement

1. Pretest Data

The result of normality test of pretest data can be seen in table

2

table2. Pretest Normality Test Results

Group N

SD Lcount Ltable

Experiment 32 31,88 11,15 0,14 0,156

Control 32 32,75 11,10 0,09 0,156

With n = amount of data in group, = average value of group,

SD = standard deviation and L = statistical symbol to test

normalization

Can be seen in Table 2 that the experimental group

obtained Lmax<Ltabel is 0.14 <0.16 and Lmaxcontrol group

<Ltabel is 0,09<0,156. This shows that both groups are

normally distributed

2. Posttest data

The result of normality test of posttest data can be seen in

Table 3

table 3. Posttest Normality Test Results

Group N

SD Lcount Ltable

Experiment 32 83,13 7,09 0,11 0,156

Control 32 76,25 8,44 0,09 0,156

Can be seen in Table 4.3 that in the experimental group

obtained Lmax<Ltabelis 0.11 <0.156 and Lmax control group

<Ltable is 0,09<0,156. This shows that both groups are

normally distributed.

3. Homogeneity Test

The results of homogeneity test analysis can be seen in table

table4. Homogeneity Test Results

Group N ∑X ∑X2

Ftable Fcount ttable Tcount

Sample 1 32 2425 186275 75,78 1,82 1,10 2,00 0,54

Sample 2 32 2385 180525 74,53

Description: n =number of students receivingtreatment

ΣX= number of posttest and pretest difference

values

x = average value of posttest andpretest

difference

Sg = standard deviation combined

The tcountvalue lies between -ttabeland ttabel(-2.00 < 0.54 <2.00)

thus, it can be concluded that both samples have the same

basic capability (homogeneous). The two homogeneous

classes were then randomly selected as experimental and

control groups, namely class X3 as the experimental group

and class X1 as the control group.

The result data of hypothesis test analysis can be seen in table

5.

table 5. Hypothesis test results

Group N ∑ X ∑X2 Sgab ttable Tcount

Experimen 32 1640 86112 51,25 9,04 1,67 3,43

Control 32 1392 62272 43,5

Description: n = number of students receivingtreatment

ΣX=number of posttest and pretest difference values

x =average value of posttest andpretest difference

Sg = standard deviation combined

The results of the hypothesis test data analysis show that

tcount>ttable (3.43> 1.67). This suggests that "the application of

the Round Robin type of cooperative learning model can

improve student achievement on the subject of Electrolyte-

Nonelectrolyte and Redox Reagents in Grade X SMAN 1

Seberida".

Improvement of student achievement of experimental

class with Round Robin cooperative learning model occurs

because Round Robin cooperative learning model requires

students to be actively involved in learning process, can

reduce student dominance in answer group questions,

encourage students to study harder and more master the

subject matter, because each student is given individual

responsibility in working on the questions given

Giving different questions to each learner in the group,

will spur interest to find out the problems done by friends

next to him. For example, at the third meeting students learn

about oxidation-reducing reactions, learners B gets about the

determination of oxidizing and reducing agents in redox

reactions, learners C gets about the determination of the

oxidation and the reduction results in the reaction redox and

learners D get questions about determination of

disproportionation and konproporsionasi reactions. The

difference of questions given will arise the interest of each

learner A, B, C and D to find out what is done by the friend

next to them. The time given to work on a problem is

approximately 5 minutes (depending on the length of the

answer). If the 5 minute time has been exhausted, the

question that has been answered will be rotated clockwise so

that each learner will receive a new problem. In the example

above, after the rotation of the questions A learners will

receive the questions from learners D, learners B receives

questions from learners A and so on until all the questions are

finished rotating. If a learner spends time to answer the

question in less than 5 minutes, then he will still wait until the

5 minute time runs out because the matter will rotate every 5


eISSN: 2548-4613

153

minutes. Rotation or rotation of questions will make learners

try their best to prepare for new problems, because the new

problem will be different from the previous problem.

The existence of rotation problems in the model of

cooperative learning type Round Robin will make all learners

involved actively in the learning process. Involvement of all

learners in solving the problems given will provide equal

opportunities for all learners to be able to issue their ideas /

opinions so as to avoid the dominance of smart students in the

learning process. The existence of time constraints in the

work of each question will make the learner to be more

serious in doing the problem because next every problem will

be done so that no chance of the students to play games in

solving the given problem.

The results showed that the experiment class students

were more active than the control class students. This can be

seen from the activities of learners during the learning process

on the assessment sheet attitude and skills of learners and

skills of learners in the practicum. Activity learners can be

seen from the involvement of all learners in the learning

process because with the rotation of the problem in the model

of cooperative learning type Round Robin every learner

involved to contribute his opinion. Then learners who ask and

answer questions in the experiment class more than the

control class because cooperative learning type Round Robin

requires learners to do the repetition in thinking so that

learners can answer the questions posed.

Round Robin learning model, Every problem done

individually by each learner will help learners to be able to

build their own knowledge because the answers come from

each individual learners so that will spur his thinking power.

[6] that when learners become active participants in the

learning process, then he will have the knowledge obtained

well.Knowledge sought and built by these learners will last

longer in the commemoration of learners, in this way can be

known to what extent learners understand the lesson given.

Although the Round Robin learning model contributes in

improving the achievement of learners, but in the

implementation there are some obstacles encountered, one of

them Limited time in the implementation of research because

at the time of answering the problem individually, there are

still learners who request additional time so that the rotation

is not smoothly because they have to wait for learners who

spend more time than specified. This is overcome by giving

emphasis and affirmation to the learners that the time

provided to answer the problem is limited so it is expected

that all learners can take advantage of the time given as

possible. Another constraint is also in one group feel

unsuitable because the division of the group is determined by

the teacher, so when the group of students become noisy, to

overcome the teacher explained that each group is formed

heterogeneously so that students can learn to adapt to the

group and also explained that will be awarded the group,

where each member of the group is responsible and should be

mutually cooperative in their respective group.

IV. CONCLUSION

The application of cooperative learning model of Round

Robin type can improve student's learning achievement on the

subject of Electrolyte-Nonelectrolyte and Redox Reaction in

class X SMA Negeri 1 Seberida with tcount>ttable is 3.43> 1.67.

The influence of students' learning achievement in the

experimental group is 15.96%.

REFERENCES

[1] Hariyanto, and Warsono, 2012, Active Learning. PT

RemajaRosdakarya, Bandung

[2] Irianto, Agus.2003. Statistics Basic Concepts and Applications.

Kencana. Jakarta

[3] M. Dimyati. 2006. Learning and Learning. RinekaCipta, Jakarta

[4] MNazir, 2003, Research Methods, Indonesian ghalia, Jakarta.

[5] R.E Slavin,. 2005. Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset,

danPraktik.Nusamedia. Bandung

[6] Slameto. 2010. Learning and Factors Affecting it. RinekaCipta:

Jakarta

[7] Sudjana, 2005, Statistical Method, Tarsito, Bandung

[8] Sudjana, 2010, Basics of Teaching and Learning Process,

Algensindo new light Bandung.

[9] Trianto. 2007. Designing Innovative Progressive Innovative

Models: Concepts, Platforms and Implementation on Education

Unit Level Curriculum.Kencana. Jakarta.

PROCEEDINGS AISTEEL 2017aisteel2017.unimed.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/150-153.pdf · Assoc....

Documents

Transcript of PROCEEDINGS AISTEEL 2017aisteel2017.unimed.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/150-153.pdf · Assoc....