Presentation Conflict
-
Upload
joe-omahoney -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
4.108 -
download
2
Transcript of Presentation Conflict
Conflict at work
Dr. Joe O’Mahoney
07906133649
Learning Objectives
• To understand three perspectives on conflict
• To discuss whether conflict is inevitable
• To understand if conflict is good for organisations
07906133649
1. A case-study
2. Theories of Conflict
3. Is conflict bad for organisations?
4. Is conflict inevitable?
5. Conclusions
The Agenda
07906133649
1. Case-study
07906133649
Gate Gourmet
• US owned
• In-flight meals for BA (outsourced in 1997)
• 2000: Mostly Punjabi women: £15k/yr
• Unionised: TGWU
• Losses at £25m / year
• Discussions on redundancies
• Workers refused GG proposals
07906133649
The Walk-out
• GG said it would replace with seasonal labour
• (Illegal) walk-out by 700 workers: picketing
• GG sacked the workers instantly
• Replaced with 130 temps
Secondary Picketing
• TGWU asked BA stewards to strike in support
• Baggage-handlers walked out (illegal)
• 550 flights cancelled: 100,000 customers
• Cost = £45m
07906133649
The Outcome
• BA strike over in 2 days
• BA sacked the 2 shop stewards– Stewards sued the trade union for £650k
• GG settled after 6 weeks
• GG settled with TGWU– 144 workers forced to take redundancy– Others re-employed or offered redundancy
07906133649
Questions
• Is conflict inevitable in capitalist organisations?
• Is conflict always bad for organisations?
• What role should the state have in mediating conflict?
07906133649
2. Theories of Conflict
07906133649
Types of Conflict
• Negotiation– Collective Bargaining– Unions – Strikes
• Sabotage– Damage– Work to rule
• Making Out– Games– Relieving boredom
• Invisible Conflict– Absenteeism– Turnover– Stress
07906133649
Unitarism
• The organisation as an organism / machine
• Conflict as illness / breakdown / pathological
• Focus on shared ideals– Profit– Natural justice– Worker development– Organisations with a heart
• Unions unnecessary– HRM, TQM etc….
07906133649
Pluralism
• Conflict is natural
• Competing needs
• Interests sometimes overlap
• Negotiated settlements– Government– Unions– Arbitration
07906133649
Radical
• Roots in Marxist / Feminist thinking
• Capitalism exploits and oppresses
• Wealth maximisation doesn’t work
• The system needs to change
• Conflict as good and necessary
• Sees pluralism as management ideology
07906133649
3. Is conflict bad for organisations?
07906133649
The utility of conflict
• Unitarists– Conflict as pathological and bad
• Pluarlists– Conflict as inevitable
– Incorrect decisions
– Other stakeholders
– Long term company interests
• Radicals– Who cares?
07906133649
Is conflict bad for profit?
Level of Intergroup Conflict
ProbableImpact onOrganization
Organization Characterized By
Level of Organizational Performance
Low or none
Slow adaptation to environment Few changes Little stimulation of ideasApathyStagnation
LowDysfunctionalSituation I
Situation II
Optimal Functional Positive movement toward goalsInnovation and changeSearch for problem solutionsCreativity and quick adaptationto environmental changes
High
Disruption Interference with activities Coordination difficultiesChaos
LowDysfunctionalHighSituation III
Mary-Jo Hatch (2000) Organization Theory (Interactionist Theory)
4. Is Conflict Inevitable?
07906133649
The Wider Corporate Agenda
“The only protection people need in a tight labour market with skills shortages is to be so adaptable, trained and valuable that no employer would dare let them go or treat them badly”
Digby Jones – Director General of the CBI
• The Neo-liberal Agenda– Lobbying government– Employer’s organisations (e.g. CBI)– Workplace pressure
• Unitarist Ideology– Free-market flexiblity– World Bank & International Monetary Fund– Pro-military and Anti-Europe
07906133649
Controlling Conflict
• Labour Market– Debt– Unemployment– Individualisation
• Monitor & Control– Information gathering– Incentives– Organisation
• Ideology– Media– Education– Groups
07906133649
Thank you
07906133649
History of trade unions
• Industrialisation– High food prices
– Unions banned
– Workhouses, starvation & poverty
• Combination Acts repealed in 1824– Fear of revolution
– Creations of unions
– Wider social movement of enfranchisement and democracy
Eisenhowever, 1961
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.