Presentation Cdc 2012

download Presentation Cdc 2012

of 21

Transcript of Presentation Cdc 2012

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    1/21

    INSTITUTEFOR SYSTEMS

    NDROBOTICS

    Fault Detection and Isolation for

    Inertial Measurement Units

    51stIEEE Conference on Decision and Control

    Maui, Hawaii, USA

    S. Brs P. Rosa C. Silvestre P. Oliveira

    Institute for Systems and Robotics

    Instituto Superior Tcnico

    Lisbon, Portugal

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    2/21

    2

    Introduction

    The navigation system is a critical component in any aircraft or

    spacecraft.

    In high reliability systems it is not only necessary to detect faults, but

    also to isolate the defective sensor.

    Objective:

    Development of Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) strategies for

    Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs).

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    3/21

    3

    Introduction

    Two strategies are proposed, which exploit:

    Hardware redundancy by identifying non-compatible redundant

    sensor measurements.

    Analytical redundancy by using Set-Valued Observers to model

    the dynamic relation between measurement of the sensor suite.

    It is assumed that the sensor measurements are corrupted by

    bounded noise.

    The proposed solutions guarantee that there will be no false alarms.

    Tuning of a decision rule based on a threshold to declare whether or

    not a fault has occurred is not needed.

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    4/21

    4

    Sensor Model

    Rate-gyros model

    Inertial vector model (such as accelerometers)

    Each component of satisfies

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    5/21

    5

    Hardware Redundancy

    Measurement model Matrix form

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    6/21

    6

    Hardware Redundancy

    (k) (k)

    Non-faulty sensors Faulty sensor

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    7/21

    7

    Hardware Redundancy

    Fault detection and isolation algorithm:

    If Set(MH,m) is empty, a fault is detected.

    Then the emptiness of Si=Set(MH\{i},m\{i}) for all sensors

    is evaluated.

    If only for one i, Siis non-empty, the faulty measurement is

    r(i). If not, it is not possible to isolate the fault at this instant.

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    8/21

    8

    Hardware Redundancy

    Proposition:

    If the magnitude of the fault is greater than , the proposed FDIscheme is able to detect and isolate non-simultaneous faults.

    Assumption:

    There are at least five sensor measurements.

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    9/21

    9

    Set-Valued Observers

    There is uncertainty on the state and on the

    measurements.

    Uncertainty is described by means of polytopes. The dynamic model may be uncertain.

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    10/21

    10

    Set-Valued Observers

    Prediction Update

    (model) (measurements)

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    11/21

    11

    Analytical Redundancy

    Analytical model of the vector observations:

    Solution:

    Using the Mean Value Theorem it can be concluded that

    Bounds on the transition matrix elements

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    12/21

    12

    Analytical Redundancy

    Fault detection filter:

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    13/21

    13

    Analytical Redundancy

    Fault detection and isolation filter:

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    14/21

    14

    Analytical Redundancy

    Stages of the FDI filter:

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    15/21

    15

    Simulation Results

    Angular velocity:

    Vector measurements:

    Noise bounded by 0.05

    Sampling period of all sensors set to T=0.1 s

    100 Monte-Carlo runs

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    16/21

    16

    Simulation Results

    We assume that one of the following six faults can occur:

    1. a stuck at type of fault in rate gyro #1;

    2. rate gyro #3 badly damaged generating a null measurement;

    3. the maximum amplitude of the noise in the rate gyro #3 increases

    fifteen times;

    4. the second component of vector #2 is null;

    5. a stuck at type of fault in first sensor of vector #1;

    6. the maximum amplitude of the noise in the third sensor of vector

    #3 increases five times.

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    17/21

    17

    Simulation Results

    Five gyros and five sensors per vector

    Three gyros and three sensors per vector

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    18/21

    18

    Simulation Results

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    19/21

    19

    Simulation Results

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    20/21

    20

    Conclusions Two novel FDI methodologies for IMUs and vector observations were

    proposed.

    The first scheme takes advantage of hardware redundancy in the sensor

    measurements to detect incoherences between them.

    Sufficient conditions have been provided that guarantees isolation of non-

    simultaneous faults.

    The dynamic relation between the angular velocity and the vector

    measurements is exploited in the second methodology, which resorts to the set-

    valued state estimates provided by SVOs to validate or falsify different models of

    faults.

    Neither solution generates false detections, as long as the non-faulty model ofthe system remains valid.

    Simulation results show that the detection and isolation of the faults take, in

    general, only a few iterations.

  • 8/12/2019 Presentation Cdc 2012

    21/21

    21

    Thank you