Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement...

11
Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool

Transcript of Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement...

Page 1: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool

Page 2: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

Background

Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010

Intended/Potential Uses:– ETDM, PD&E, 3R, local projects, assessing

developments

Align near-term projects with future land use and transit ridership

Page 3: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

Background

Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool based on Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index developed by City of San Francisco

Tested on six area roads: Edgewater Dr., Park Ave., SR 50

Downtown, SR 50 West, SR 438, US 441

Page 4: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

Scores

All based on 0 to 100 scale• Intersection Score • Walkability Score – combination of all

features related to the walking experience• Mid-Block Crossing Score – ease or

difficulty of crossing between intersections

Page 5: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

Scores

• Block Intersection Score – average of intersection scores for a given block

• Total Crossing Score – combination Mid-Block and Block Intersection scores

• Pedestrian Trip Potential – estimate of relative potential for pedestrian trips along and across the road

Page 6: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool

StreetEdgewate

r DrivePark Ave.

SR 50 Downtow

n

SR 50 West

US 441

SOBT

SR 438 Silver Star

Average Intersection Score

37 81 32 35 19 26

Total Block Walkability Score

42 86 34 22 25 37

Mid-Block Crossing Score

51 69 39 34 32 33

Block Intersection Score

37 78 33 31 18 26

Total Crossing Score (Mid-Block + Intersection)

44 74 36 33 26 29

Pedestrian Trip Potential Score

49 72 64 61 53 39

Page 7: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.
Page 8: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

12 Crashes in 3 Years

22 Crashes in 3 Years

Avg. Walkability Score – 34Avg. Crossing Score – 36

Avg. Walkability Score – 22Avg. Crossing Score – 33

Page 9: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

23 Crashes in 3 Years

31 Crashes in 3 Years

Avg. Walkability Score – 37Avg. Crossing Score – 29

Avg. Walkability Score – 25Avg. Crossing Score – 26

Page 10: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

1 Crash in 3 Years

3 Crashes in 3 Years

Avg. Walkability Score – 42Avg. Crossing Score – 44

Avg. Walkability Score – 86Avg. Crossing Score – 74

Page 11: Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

Next Steps

• “Fine-tuning”• Technical memo to describe elements and

guide users in data collection and entry• Local governments develop land use

thresholds for Pedestrian Trip Potential scores

• Develop future transit ridership projections/goals