PCT – Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twentieth Session Munich, February 6 to 8,...
-
Upload
jesus-mcgregor -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of PCT – Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twentieth Session Munich, February 6 to 8,...
PCT – Statistics
Meeting of International AuthoritiesTwentieth Session
Munich, February 6 to 8, 2013
2
Outline
1) PCT International Filings1) Overall Trends and Forecasts2) Origin of Applicants and Trends3) Field of Technology4) Medium of Filing5) Languages
2) PCT National Phase Entries1) Trends and Comparison with Direct “Paris” Filings2) Origin of Applicants3) Offices
3) International Authorities4) PCT – Patent Prosecution Highway
3
PCT International Application Filings
0
20'000
40'000
60'000
80'000
100'000
120'000
140'000
160'000
180'000
200'000
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Source: WIPO Statistics Database; WIPO estimate
1) PCT International Application Filings2010: 164,338 international applications (+5.7%)
2011: 182,371 international applications (+11.0%)
2012: 174,050 international applications (until end November)
4
Trends in PCT Applications
5
PCT Applications by Top 10 Origins
0
10'000
20'000
30'000
40'000
50'000
60'000
United S
tate
s of A
mer
icaJa
pan
Germ
any
China
Republi
c of K
orea
Franc
e
United K
ingdom
Switzer
land
Nether
lands
Sweden
PC
T a
pp
lica
tio
ns
2011
2012 (to date)49,051
38,874
18,85216,402
10,4477,438
4,848 4,009 3,503 3,462
Numbers represent total filings for 2011 and growth rate (%) 2010-20112012 data cover January to October 2012
8.9%
20.9%
7.3%33.4%
8.0%2.6%
-0.9% 7.5% -13.8% 4.5%
6
PCT Applications by Origins 11 to 20
0
500
1'000
1'500
2'000
2'500
3'000
3'500
Canada
Italy
Finlan
d
Austra
liaSpa
inIsr
ael
Austri
aIn
dia
Denmar
k
Belgium
PC
T a
pp
lica
tio
ns
2011
2012 (to date)
Numbers represent total filings for 2011 and growth rate (%) 2010-20112012 data cover January to October 2012
2,9292,695
2,079
1,739 1,729
1,452 1,346 1,330 1,3141,191
8.6%1.4%
-2.8%
-1.9% -2.4%
-1.6% 18.0% 3.4% 11.9%12.8%
7
PCT Monthly Filing Trends (USA / Germany)
8
PCT Monthly Filing Trends (Japan/ Korea)
9
PCT Monthly Filing Trends (China/ France)
10
PCT Monthly Filing Trends (Canada/Sweden)
11
Country share in total PCT applications1995 2011
12
PCT Applications filed by Region of Origin for Asia, Europe and North America
Asia became biggest PCT filing region in 2010 and now accountsfor 38.8% of all PCT applications (about 8% higher than Europe)
13
PCT Applications filed by Region of Origin of Applicant for Africa, Latin America and the
Caribbean and Oceania
14
Main Fields of Technology for PCT Published Applications and Changes from 2010 to 2011
Largest increases: Electrical machinery: +23.2% Engines, pumps, turbines:
+16.9%
Environmental technology:
+14.1% Transport: +13.9%
Decreases in 4 out of 35 fields: Basic communication processes:
-5.9% Organic fine chemistry: -4.1% Pharmaceuticals: -1.9% Analysis of biological materials:
-0.3%
Main Fields of Technology for PCT Applications by Percentage of Total:
Digital Communication Technology 11,574 applications (7.1%) Electrical Machinery 11,296 applications (6.9%) Medical Technology 10,753 applications (6.6%) Computer Technology 10,455 applications (6.4%)
15
PCT – Method of Filing (1)
16
PCT - Method of Filing (2)
Share of PCT filings by Medium of Filing (%)
Paper EASY PDF XML EFS-Web
2008 25.7 10.3 32.2 20.1 11.8
2009 20.1 7.3 37.0 22.8 12.8
2010 16.1 5.5 40.8 24.3 13.2
2011 12.8 4.5 43.7 26.1 12.9
2012 (to date) 9.8 3.2 45.6 28.4 13.0
17
Distribution of Application Languages for 2012
Share (%)
52.3 20.5 9.9 8.0 4.5 3.2 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.0
93,271
36,480
17,71314,189
7,959 5,6231,598 961 418 0
Ap
plic
ati
on
s in
20
12
Engl
ish
Japa
nese
Germ
an
Chine
se
Kore
an
Fren
ch
Span
ish
Russ
ian
Portu
gues
e
Arabi
c
Language
Figures are estimates from PCT filings to date
18
2) PCT – National Phase Entries
424,800 non-resident national phase entries for 2011 (3.2% growth on 2010) 500,400 total national phase entries (resident plus non-resident) for 2011
19
PCT National Phase Entries for Top 15 Countries of Origin 2010
All top 15 origins except the Netherlands saw growth in National Phase Entries.Highest growth in National Phase Entries from China (+ 46.8%).
20
PCT National Phase Entries before Top 15 Designated Offices 2011
0
20'000
40'000
60'000
80'000
100'000
US EP CN JP KR IN CA AU RU MX SG ZA IL MY NZ
Patent Office
To
tal
PC
T N
atio
nal
Ph
ase
En
trie
s
21
National Phase Entries by Top Patent Office and Country of Origin in 2011
22
Share of PCT national phase entries in total non-resident filings by selected Patent Office for 2011
Overall share of PCT National Phase Entries for non-resident applications around 54% in 2011.
23
3) International AuthoritiesInternational Search ReportsDistribution by International AuthorityTimeliness of Transmission to International Bureau
Supplementary International Search Reports
International Preliminary Examination ReportsDemandDistribution by International AuthorityTimeliness of Transmission to International Bureau
24
Distribution of ISRs established by ISA70'080
23'160
14'592
12'574
3'268
2'436
1'9501'290
1'008
1'003
597
356
284
35'641
European Patent Office
Japan
Republic of Korea
China
United States of America
Australia
Canada
Sweden
Spain
Russian Federation
Finland
Austria
Brazil
Nordic Patent Institute
2009
2010
2011
2012 (to date)
Data based on transmittal date of the ISR to the International Bureau
Numbers and percentage share of ISRs for 2011 shown as numbers2012 includes numbers from January to September
41.7%
21.2%
13.8%
7.5%
8.7%
1.9%
1.4%
1.2%
0.77%
0.60%
0.60%
0.35%
0.21%
0.17%
25
Average Timeliness in Transmitting ISRs to the IB
Average Time in Transmitting ISRs to the IB was 16.4 months in 2011, the shortest over the past decade. 68.3% of ISRs were received within 17 months in 2011 [67.0% in 2010]. From Jan - Sept 2012, 69.0% of ISRS were received within 17 months.Timeliness soon to be measured according to Rule 42.
26
Timeliness in Transmitting ISRs
Timeliness calculated as time elapsed between priority date and date ISA transmits ISR to the International Bureau (soon to be measured according to Rule 42)
From Jan to Sept 2012 (2011 in brackets): <17 months 69% (68.3%), 17-18 months 12.8% (12.2%), 19-20 months 11.2% (8.4%), 21-30 months 6.2% (10.3%), >31 months 0.7% (0.8%)
27
Timeliness in Transmitting ISRs by ISA in 2011
Timeliness calculated as time elapsed between priority date and date ISA transmits ISR to the International Bureau (soon to be measured according to Rule 42)
22.225.262.164.458.974.974.486.290.888.785.797.299.697.7
Share transmitted within 17 months for Jan – Sept 2012 (for comparison)
28
Distribution of SISRs by SISA
Supplementary International Searching Authority
Year
2009 2010 2011 2012
to end Sept
Total 24 41 41 41
Austria 1 2
European Patent Office 3 7 18
Finland 1
Nordic Patent Institute 1 2
Russian Federation 22 35 31 18
Sweden 2 2 2
29
International Preliminary Examination Demands (1)
0
5'000
10'000
15'000
20'000
25'000
30'000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Year
Nu
mb
er
of
De
ma
nd
s
Others
USPTO
JPO
EPO
Demand for International Preliminary Examination fell by 47.0% from 2005 to 2011.
30
International Preliminary Examination Demands (2) IPEA_Name 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012
Year / Quarter - - - - - - - to date to date
Total 25'861 21'661 19'501 18'126 15'258 13'897 13'703 10'652 (%)
Australia 1'035 970 872 865 789 745 781 590 5.5
Austria 160 114 100 103 68 36 16 6 0.1
Brazil 7 38 29 0.3
Canada 327 431 413 480 290 272 266 165 1.5
China 436 364 384 416 303 362 420 340 3.2
European Patent Office 13'878 11'605 10'586 9'862 8'592 7'917 7'385 5'823 54.7
Finland 4 125 151 154 144 123 125 86 0.8
Japan 2'526 2'580 2'555 2'122 2'152 2'121 2'447 2'060 19.3
Nordic Patent Institute 26 40 40 29 0.3
Republic of Korea 652 598 511 358 340 271 221 223 2.1
Russian Federation 138 114 121 97 66 76 83 79 0.7
Spain 127 111 126 107 142 123 120 64 0.6
Sweden 986 686 666 620 468 353 343 260 2.4
United States of America 5'591 3'963 3'016 2'942 1'878 1'451 1'416 897 8.4
31
Distribution of IPRPs by IPEA
The EPO carried out 47.6% of IPRPs, followed by the USPTO (23.0%) and the JPO (14.6%).
32
Average Timeliness in Transmitting IPRPs
Average time taken to transmit IPRPs increased from 27.6 months in 2001 to 31.6 months in 2011 with 68.8% of IPRPs transmitted within 29 months for 2011. (67.0% from Jan to Sept 2012).
33
Timeliness in Transmitting IPRPs
Timeliness calculated as time elapsed between priority date and date on which International Bureau receives IPRP form the IPEA.
From Jan to Sept 2012 (2011 in brackets): <29 months 67.0% (68.8%), 29-30 months 15.5% (11.5%), 31-32 months 3.6% (2.5%), >32 months 13.9% (17.2%)
34
Timeliness in Transmitting IPRPs by IPEA in 2011
Timeliness calculated as time elapsed between priority date and date on which International Bureau receives IPRP form the IPEA.
22.930.165.637.163.341.673.496.470.473.783.391.285.190.3
Share transmitted within 29 months for Jan – Sept 2012 (for comparison)
35
4) PCT-Patent Prosecution Highway
6,159 PCT-PPH requests until end June 2012 17,383 standard PPH requests in same period
36
PCT-PPH Grant Rate and Pendency Time
Further information:
2012 PCT Yearly ReviewThe International Patent System
WIPO Publication No:901E/2012
2012 World Intellectual Property IndicatorsWIPO Publication No:941E/2012
Statistics on the PCT Systemhttp://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/pct/
Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Sitehttp://www.jpo.go.jp/ppph-portal/index.htm