台北市職業工會導入 TTQS...

17
1 台北市職業工會導入 TTQS 關鍵成功因素之分析 白景文 文化大學勞工關係學系 助理教授 孔毓翔 文化大學勞工關係學系 碩士研究生 摘要 本文旨在探討導入「台灣訓練品質系統」(TTQS)的關鍵成功因素,研究對象為台北市 職業工會。本文歷經三個階段,首先由文獻探討歸納出導入 TTQS 關鍵成功因素的訪談問卷; 其次進行台北市職業工會 TTQS 承辦人和 TTQS 評核委員的深度訪談,運用質性研究方法的 紮根理論,歸納台北市職業工會導入 TTQS 關鍵成功因素的構面為:組織管理面、訓練規劃 面、訓練執行面及訓練評估面等四大構面,共有 16 項關鍵成功因素;繼而專家學者運用層級 分析程序法(AHP),獲致上述構面、關鍵成功因素的相對權重。根據所得之結果,對於台北 市職業工會欲導入、已導入 TTQS 者以及針對 TTQS 訓練機構版的計分項目配重,提出應用 關鍵成功因素的實務作法,並提陳後續研究者之具體建議。 關鍵字:職業工會、職業訓練、台灣訓練品質系統(TTQS)、關鍵成功因素 Abstract This study investigates the key success factors of Taipei City Worker Union, which has introduced the TTQS (Taiwan TrainQuali System) to control the validity of training. The process of this study could be separated into 3 parts: questionnaire design, interview, survey and analyze. First, going trough documents to collect and combine difference thesis to build a solid questionnaire. Afterward, interviewing with people who are in charge of TTQS project in Taipei City Worker Union and TTQS of auditor. Finally, analyzing the information and the result of survey based on grounded theory of qualitative research. By using the grounded theory we could learn that the achievement of this case is attributed to 4 main aspects (organization management, training planning, training project executing and training evaluating) and 16 key factors. In short, after analyzing 4 main aspects and 16 key factors of the relative weight by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The study results above- mentioned substantial operations to those whom Taipei City Worker union, TTQS Scorecard for Trainer. Final, this study provides concrete suggestions follow-up researchers may concern with TTQS projects in future. Key word Worker union, Vocational training, Taiwan TrainQuali System TTQS, Key Success Factors 1:感謝「2010 年經濟整合、企業治理與人力運用研討會」接受發表,修正後刊登。 2:本文接受「98 學年度中國文化大學專任教師研究計畫案」補助。

Transcript of 台北市職業工會導入 TTQS...

  • 1

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS TTQS

    TTQS

    16

    AHP

    TTQS TTQS

    TTQS

    Abstract

    This study investigates the key success factors of Taipei City Worker Union, which has introduced

    the TTQS (Taiwan TrainQuali System) to control the validity of training.

    The process of this study could be separated into 3 parts: questionnaire design, interview, survey and

    analyze. First, going trough documents to collect and combine difference thesis to build a solid

    questionnaire. Afterward, interviewing with people who are in charge of TTQS project in Taipei City

    Worker Union and TTQS of auditor. Finally, analyzing the information and the result of survey based on

    grounded theory of qualitative research. By using the grounded theory we could learn that the

    achievement of this case is attributed to 4 main aspects (organization management, training planning,

    training project executing and training evaluating) and 16 key factors. In short, after analyzing 4 main

    aspects and 16 key factors of the relative weight by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The study

    results above- mentioned substantial operations to those whom Taipei City Worker union, TTQS

    Scorecard for Trainer. Final, this study provides concrete suggestions follow-up researchers may concern

    with TTQS projects in future.

    Key word Worker union, Vocational training, Taiwan TrainQuali System

    TTQS, Key Success Factors

    12010

    298

  • 2

    (International Labor Organization, ILO)

    The International Organization for

    Standardization, ISO1999ISO 10015

    (Investors in People, IIP)

    ISO 10015IIP(Taiwan TrainQuali System,

    TTQS)(2006)2009

    5858714.83,595(

    2010)

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQSTTQS

    TTQS(2009)

    TTQSTTQS

    (2009)TTQS

    ISO 9000ISO 10015

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    1999

    (1994)

    (

    2001)(2000)

    (1991)

    (TTQS)

    TTQS ISO 10015 IIP

    1.2.3.

  • 3

    (2010)TTQS ISO 10015

    PDCA ()

    (plan)(design)(do)(review)(outcome)

    PDDRO PDDRO (

    200920082006)

    TTQS

    (2006)

    Key Success Factors, KSFs

    Aaker(1984)

    TTQS

    TTQSTTQSISO

    10015ISO 90012000ISO 10015TTQS

    TTQS

    ISO 9001

    ISO 10 ISO

    10015TTQS ISO 10015TTQS

    5

    ISO 9001ISO 10015TTQS12TTQS

    TTQS

    1.2.3.4.

    5.6.7.

    8.9.10.11.

    12.

    12.

    13.

    10.

    11.

    (do)

    14./

    15.

    16.

    17.

    18.

    5./

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    1.

    1. 2.

    2. 3.

    3. 4.

    (design)

    (plan)

    (outcome)

    (review)

  • 4

    TTQS

    TTQS

    AHPExpert Choice

    TTQSTTQS

    TTQS201042651615

    TTQS312

    2

    AHP

    AHP

    TTQS

    2010528642320

    1516

    TTQS16

    AHP16

    15

    15

    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

    8 8 15 9 9 8 11 7 9 6 12 13 10 15 18

    AEA8

    A01.A02.

    TTQSA03.A04.TTQSTTQS

    A05.A06.A07.A08.

    BA8

    16

  • 5

    ABCDE

    A B C D E

    01

    02 TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    03

    04

    TTQS TTQS

    TTQS

    05

    TTQS

    TTQS

    06

    07

    08

    09

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    AA01.13

    C01K03N01

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    10

    TTQS

    1616

  • 6

    AA01

    C01

    1.

    2. TTQS OK

    3.

    4. TTQS

    K03

    1. TTQS

    2.

    TTQS

    N01

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    PDCA

    ()

  • 7

    TTQS

    16TTQS

    TTQS

    16

    TTQS

    TTQS TTQS

    5 TTQS 5

    5 TTQS 5

    3

    3

    PDCA

    TTQS 3

  • 8

    16AHP

    23

    20C.R.H.0.1

    15 65%

    16SaatyForman(1996)

    InconsistencyC.R. C.R.=0.01

  • 9

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    Model Name: TTQSR1

    Synthesis: Summary

    Synthesis with respect to: Goal: TTQS

    Overall Inconsistency = .01

    .097

    .045

    .048

    .042

    .077

    .041

    .063

    .044

    PDCA .040

    .050

    .020

    TTQS .106

    TTQS .051

    .041

    TTQS .058

    .175

    Page 1 of 12010/6/13 08:40:48

    fatcatfatcat

    TT

    QS

    0.432

    0.406

    TTQS 0.246

    TTQS 0.118

    TTQS 0.135

    0.095

    0.267

    0.158

    0.288

    0.154

    0.237

    0.163

    0.190

    0.510

    0.239

    0.251

    0.111

    PDCA 0.364

    0.453

    0.184

  • 10

    TTQS

    TTQSTTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    T

    T

    Q

    S

    (W=0.190)

    (W=0.267)

    (W=0.111)

    PDCA (W=0.364)

    (W=0.453)

    (W=0.184)

    (W=0.432)

    TTQS W=0.246)

    (W=0.163)

    (W=0.154)

    (W=0.158)

    (W=0.288)

    (w=0.288) (W=0.237)

    (W=0.239)

    (W=0.510)

    (W=0.251)

    TTQS (W=0.135)

    TTQS (W=0.118)

    (W=0.095)

    (W=0.406)

  • 11

    TTQS

    PDCA

    TTQS

    j

    TTQS TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS 125711

    1.

    2. TTQS

    3.

    4. TTQS

    TTQS

    TTQS 3468910

    1.

    2.

    TTQS

    W=0.175 1

    TTQS W=0.106 2

    W=0.097 3

    W=0.077 4

    W=0.063 5

    TTQS W=0.058 6

    TTQS W=0.051 7

    W=0.050 8

    W=0.048 9

    W=0.045 10

    W=0.044 11

    W=0.042 12

    W=0.041 13

    W=0.041 13

    PDCA W=0.040 15

    W=0.020 16

  • 12

    3.

    4.

    TTQS

    1 6

    W=0.518

    6

    3.6.7.

    9e.

  • 13

    ISO 10015384 2006 160-162

    ISO 9000

    1997

    ISO 9000

    1996

    2010 1 12 http://ttqs.evta.gov.tw/prjint.asp

    2010

    204

    2010

    -

    2002

    TTQS 7 2010 1 3

    http://ttqs.evta.gov.tw/download/pc/200910093229598/ TTQS 7

    .pdf2009

    HR- IIP ISO10015 TTQS TTQS

    2008

    ISO 10015

    43 13 2007

    ISO9000(2000)

    2004

    ISO 10015 open -

    http//open.nat.gov.tw/OpenFront/report/report_detail.jsp?sysId=C09502548

    2006

    5 2 44-512006

    ISO 9000 1999

    ISO 90012000

    2003

    22000

    1994

    TTQS2007

    TTQS TTQS 2009

    ISO 9001:2000 37 10 2001

    1991

    TTQS

    http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22085THU00457025%22.&searchmode=basichttp://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22085THU00457025%22.&searchmode=basichttp://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22084CCU02396003%22.&searchmode=basichttp://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22084CCU02396003%22.&searchmode=basichttp://ttqs.evta.gov.tw/prjint.asphttp://ttqs.evta.gov.tw/download/pc/200910093229598/TTQS7.pdfhttp://ttqs.evta.gov.tw/download/pc/200910093229598/TTQS7.pdfhttp://open.nat.gov.tw/OpenFront/report/report_detail.jsp?sysId=C095025482006http://open.nat.gov.tw/OpenFront/report/report_detail.jsp?sysId=C095025482006http://readopac3.ncl.edu.tw/nclJournal/search/detail.jsp?dtdId=000040&search_type=detail&la=ch&checked=&unchecked=&sysId=0004705166http://140.137.101.70:81/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=126A5349871AM.350092&profile=ccu&uri=search=SER@!%E5%8B%9E%E5%8B%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E5%8F%A2%E6%9B%B8&menu=search&submenu=basic_search&source=140.137.101.70@!ccu
  • 14

    2009

    ISO 9000

    2005

    ISO 9000

    38 5 2002

    ISO 9002

    2000

    ISO 9000 1997

    1999

    ISO9000

    1997

    ISO 9000

    1994

    ISO 9000

    1996

    Aaker, A. Strategic Market Management., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1984, pp.24-70.

    Bigelow, J. S. , C. Johnson, C. A . Cianfrani, and J. Stratton , Transitioning to the new ISO 9001,

    Quality Congress, American Society for Quality, Annual Quality Congress Proceedings,

    Milwaukee, 2001, pp. 269-274.

    Carlsson, M. and D. Carlsson, Experiences of implementing ISO 9000 in Swedish industry,

    International Journal of Quality and Reliability, Vol. 13 No. 7, 1996, pp. 36-47.

    Conti, T., Vision 2000:positioning the new ISO 9000 standards with respect to total quality

    management models, Total Quality Management, 10 (7), 1999, pp. 454-465.

    Michael, G. S., Transition to ISO 9001:2000, Business News Publishing Company, August, 2001,

    pp. 28-30

    Saaty, T.L. and E.H. Forman, The Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hierarchies., AHP Series Vol. 5,

    RWS Publications, 1996, pp.496.

    Vloeberghs, D. and J. Bellens, , "ISO 9000 in Belgium: experience of Belgian quality managers and

    HRM", European Management Journal , 14: 2, 1996, pp.207-211.

    Weston, F. C. Jr., What Do Managers Really Think of the ISO 9000 Registerarion

    Process, ,Quality Press, 28:10, 1995, pp. 67-73.

    http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22093NTHU5031041%22.&searchmode=basichttp://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22093NTHU5031041%22.&searchmode=basichttp://readopac3.ncl.edu.tw/nclJournal/search/detail.jsp?dtdId=000040&search_type=detail&la=ch&checked=&unchecked=&sysId=0005808303http://readopac3.ncl.edu.tw/nclJournal/search/detail.jsp?dtdId=000040&search_type=detail&la=ch&checked=&unchecked=&sysId=0005808303http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22089THU00055014%22.&searchmode=basichttp://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22089THU00055014%22.&searchmode=basic
  • 15

    ISO 9001

    ISO 9001

    (1994)

    SPSS

    Weston(1995)

    (1997)

    1.

    2.

    SPSS

    Vloeberghs &

    Bellens(1996)

    Carlsson &

    Carlsson(1996)

    (1996)

    (1996)

    SPSS

    (1997)

    (1997)

    SPSS

    Conti (1999)

    (1999)

    Bigelow et

    al.(2001)

    Michael (2001)

    (2001)

  • 16

    ISO 9001

    (2002)

    (2000)

    SPSS

    (2003)

    SPSSSAS

    (2004)

    SPSS

    (2005)

    (2003) (2008)

  • 17

    ISO 10015TTQS

    ISO 10015

    (2006)

    HRD

    (2006)

    (2007)

    SPSS

    TTQS

    (2007)

    KPI

    (2009)

    AHP