NIMPs (v IMPs): Definitions and Practical Approaches · NIMPs (v IMPs): Definitions and Practical...
Transcript of NIMPs (v IMPs): Definitions and Practical Approaches · NIMPs (v IMPs): Definitions and Practical...
NIMPs (v IMPs): Definitions and Practical Approaches
Esther Sadler-Williams
Global Director Strategic Development and Innovation
18th November 2015
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved
Note: contributions are based on the individual’s knowledge and expertise; this presentation should not be construed as a statement or opinion by Catalent Pharma Solutions.
Disclaimer
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 1
2
Agenda
Current Status
• Definitions-
• Practical Approaches to Management
− Sourcing
− Labelling and Packaging
− Traceability, Complaints, Recalls,
Adverse Events
Impact of New CT regulations
Summary
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved
Current Status - Define a NIMP?
Background
Medication
Concomitant
meds
Escape /
Rescue
meds
Diagnostic /
Endpoint
Medications
Preventive
Medication
‘Not being
tested’ Challenge /
Physiologic
response meds
Commercial
products?
Standard of
Care (SOC)
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 3
4
Current Status
Regulatory Environment
• Currently no regulations around NIMPS
• Guidance from the European Commission*
— Defines nIMPs, provides examples, and required filing documentation
Non-Investigational Medicinal Product (NIMP)*
A medical product not defined within the description of an IMP and maybe considered a background (SOC), challenge, concomitant, endpoint or rescue medication (escape) dosed for preventive, diagnosis or therapeutic reasons. It can be provided by sponsor or study site.
Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP)**
A pharmaceutical form of an active or placebo being tested or used as a reference in a clinical trials including products with a marketing authorization but used or assembled (formulated or packaged) in a way different to the authorised form, or when used in an unauthorised indication or when used to gain further information about the authorised form.
*Euradlex Volume 10 – Chapter III March 2011 and **EU Directive 2001/20/EC; April 2001
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved
Who and how to determine NIMP v IMP?
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 5
Which functional area is responsible for classification of study medication as either a NIMP or IMP? (select only one choice)
• Quality may often determine • Should have MA
–off label use more challenging
• Each case is different, depends on − Category and how its used − How drug regiment selected − Source − Presentation
• Complex… thus many just define as
IMPS!
Has your organization been challenged by a country Health Authority when classifying a clinical trial material
Summary of ISPE survey
ISPE Survey of 57 companies on various experiences with IMPs
• Most companies (78%) managed more than 25 protocols per year
• 30% of companies don’t distinguish between nIMPs an IMPs
• Sourcing
— 25% central; 58% local (22% sponsor controlled, 22% trial site order, 14% site inventory)
• 66% added some form of label to NIMP commercial packaging
6 ©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved
Practical Approaches- Sourcing of NIMPs
Sourcing Strategy will impact ‘practical’ management of IMPS
• Central, Local or ‘Blended Approach’
• Conduct ‘availability analysis’
• Consider MA status, availability, cost, import duties
Central Sourcing; bought in a single country to supply all
• Processes similar to IMPs
Local Sourcing; purchased in country where it will be used
• Country affiliate, third party or clinical site
• Specific considerations for Clinical site sourcing
• If used as per MA – no additional labelling unless competent authority specifies
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 7
Summary of NIMP Sourcing Strategy
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 8
Practical Approaches- Labelling of NIMPs
• IMP labelling requirements do not apply to NIMPs
• However.. some EU competent authorities have ‘stickering’ requirements
− Trial ID
− Sponsor
− ‘For Clinical Trial Use only’
• Labelling of Commercially available product
− Is it labelled according to MA?
− Ensure protocol defines product as a NIMP
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 9
How does your organization typically label commercially available NIMPs?
Practical Approaches- Packaging and Labelling of NIMPs
Generally approach depends on sourcing strategy
• Central Sourcing
− Re-label if
o country specific language not available
o Separating from commercial marketing presentation e.g single blisters removed from carton
o Altered commercial pack – authorities may consider as IMP
o If labelled need retain sample and QP release
• Local sourcing
− Country requirements may apply
− May need to consider ‘auxiliary label’ or ‘sticker’
o ‘For clinical trial use only’, Kit ID #
− Supports traceability and any integration to IRT
− Generally no retains or QP release as above details not considered as GMP label
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved
10
Practical Approaches for NIMPs- Other
Traceability: Records should document chain of custody
• Should be able to – ‘reconstruct movements of NIMPS’
• No regulatory requirements for returns and accountability for NIMPS
— But would be good practice
— To monitor safe handling and deviations from prescribed storage conditions that may impact the integrity of a NIMP
— To potentially support investigation of an adverse event for which the root cause may be a problem linked to drug
— To support a commercial recall
• If IRT used for traceability – need to affix ID label
Complaints and Recalls
• Should be part of Site Qualification process;
• Aligned to sourcing strategy but suggest manage as per IMPS
Adverse Event Management
• As IMPS ©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 11
Impact of New CT regulations
In summary… Very Little!
NIMPs will become Auxiliary Medicinal Products (AMPs)
Definition: Medicinal product used for the needs of the clinical trial as described in the protocol but not as an Investigational Medicinal Product.
• Authorised – in any member state
• (unauthorised) - can be used in ‘justified cases’ (para 53)
• Be certain it’s a AMP! If required for the study.. Its an IMP
• Do not have to label AMP If commercial label provides all the information (para 57)
− Unauthorised AMP- labelling requirements same as IMP
− Specifics around radiopharmaceuticals
• Subjects should not have to pay for AMPs
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 12
Summary
NIMPs
• Be certain about your justification for categorisation
• Consider carefully sourcing strategy if appropriate to needs of protocol and clinical sites
• If sourcing locally often can minimise packaging and labelling needs
• May wish to consider ‘identifier’ auxiliary label for traceability
The future:
• New CT regs will provide more guidance than previously
• Other than a name change.. management will be similar to today
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 13
NIMPs (and IMPs)
Thank you for your attention
Esther Sadler-Williams
Catalent Pharma Solutions
+44-7711 853242
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved 14
discover more. CATALENT PHARMA SOLUTIONS 14 SCHOOLHOUSE ROAD SOMERSET, NJ 08873
+ 1 866 720 3148
www.catalent.com
Summary of Approaches for NIMPS
Sourcing Strategy for NIMP
Sponsor label Overlay
Funded or re-imbursed by Sponsor
Return to sponsor for Destruction
Return for local Destruction
Return to Site Inventory
CENTRAL Yes Yes Yes Yes* No
No Yes Yes Yes* No
Locally Sourced at Site
Yes Yes Yes Yes* No
No Yes Yes Yes* No
No No No No* Yes
* Local destruction may be permissible
©2015 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved
16