NGU - BULL 427. 1995 Arve Misutu), David BanksNGU -BULL 427, 1995 Arve Misund, David Banks & Patrice...

3
NGU - BULL 427. 1995 Arve Misutu), David Banks & Patrice de Caritat 83 Hydrogeological investigation of water for export from Nordland county, Norway ARVE MISUND. DAVID BANKS & PATRICE DE CARITAT Arve Misund i , David Banks ii & Patrice de Carital ir;3eological Survey of Norway. P.O. Box 3006-Lade, N-7002 Trondheim, Norway. 11Present address: Department of Earth Sciences. University of Sheffield, Dainton, Building, Brookhill, Sheffield. S3 7HF. England. Fig. 2. Time-series for calcium concentrations (a) and dischar- ge rate (b). Kall dalen spring (November 1992 to February 1994). Norway. . I / ..... .. a 54 b Results The time-series water quality data from this stu- dy show a strong negative correlation between water discharge and the concentrations of Ca and Mg, reflecting the interplay between water residence time and mineral-water interaction and dilution. For the karst spring at Kattdalen the Ca concentration fluctuates between 48 and 55 mg/I, which in Norway is regarded as high (Fig. 2). The bacteriological quality is excellent at all sites, including the high-mountain lakes. Table 1 shows summarised results of water quality moni- toring. During spring 1993, it became clear that the three sources from the coastal high-mountain lake areas could not be recognised as 'natural mineral water', due to lack of natural protection (not groundwater). Because of this, the sampling programme was terminated for these three sites in August 1993, and site investigations were not completed. 120 I '''' , OSLO ..... . .... ':' ", -,' . .. '" - ..... , .. - ;, lLJ .i" : TRONDHBM /'t) .... Introduction In northern Norway, a region remote from English industrial smokestacks and with an 'ultraclean Arctic' image, the Geological Survey of Norway (NGU) has initiated a one-year moni- toring programme of 7 water sources in Nordland county (Fig. 1), with sampling on a monthly basis. The sampling procedure is in accordance with the Norwegian legislation on sale of bottled water (Sosialdep. 1977). Three of the sources are near-coastal high-mountain lakes, remote from human activity; two springs emerge from Quaternary deposits; the remaining two are Palaeozoic limestone karst springs. The field- work was carried out from November 1992 to February 1994, covering water sampling, field investigation and continuous monitoring of water discharge and temperature. At the Kattdalen karst spring, electrical conductivity was also continuously monitored. Fig. 1. Location of the sites of the water monitoring programm e in Nordland county.

Transcript of NGU - BULL 427. 1995 Arve Misutu), David BanksNGU -BULL 427, 1995 Arve Misund, David Banks & Patrice...

Page 1: NGU - BULL 427. 1995 Arve Misutu), David BanksNGU -BULL 427, 1995 Arve Misund, David Banks & Patrice de Caritat 85 Table 1. Major components at the monitored sources in Nordland county,

NGU - BULL 427. 1995 Arve Misutu), David Banks & Patrice de Caritat 83

Hydrogeological investigation of water for export fromNordland county, Norway

ARVE MISUND. DAVID BANKS & PATRICE DE CARITAT

Arve Misundi, David Banksii& Patrice de Caritalir;3eological Survey of Norway. P.O. Box 3006-Lade, N-7002 Trondheim, Norway.11Present address: Department of Earth Sciences. University of Sheffield, Dainton, Building, Brookhill, Sheffield. S3 7HF. England.

Fig. 2. Time-series for calcium concentrations (a) and dischar­ge rate (b). Kall dalen spring (November 1992 to February1994). Norway.

.• • I

/ .......a

54

b

ResultsThe time-series water quality data from this stu­dy show a strong negative correlat ion betweenwater discharge and the concentrat ions of Caand Mg, reflecting the interplay between waterresidence time and mineral-water interaction anddilution. For the karst spring at Kattdalen the Caconcentration fluctuates between 48 and 55mg/I, which in Norway is regarded as high (Fig.2). The bacteriological quality is excellent at allsites, including the high-mountain lakes. Table 1shows summarised results of water quality moni­toring.

During spring 1993, it became clear that thethree sources from the coastal high-mountainlake areas could not be recognised as 'naturalmineral water' , due to lack of natural protection(not groundwater). Because of this, the samplingprogramme was terminated for these three sitesin August 1993, and site investigations were notcompleted.

120I

'''', • OSLO..... ..... ':'", -,' .

. ~.. '" ­.....,... -;,

~::lLJ

.i" :TRONDHBM/'t)....

IntroductionIn northern Norway, a region remote fromEnglish industrial smokestacks and with an'ultraclean Arctic' image, the Geological Surveyof Norway (NGU) has initiated a one-year moni­toring programme of 7 water sources in Nordlandcounty (Fig. 1), with sampling on a monthlybasis. The sampling procedure is in accordancewith the Norwegian legislation on sale of bottledwater (Sosialdep. 1977). Three of the sourcesare near-coastal high-mountain lakes, remotefrom human activity; two springs emerge fromQuaternary deposits; the remaining two arePalaeozoic limestone karst springs. The field­work was carried out from November 1992 toFebruary 1994, covering water sampling, fieldinvestigation and continuous monitoring of waterdischarge and temperature. At the Kattdalenkarst spring, electrical conductivity was alsocontinuously monitored.

Fig. 1. Location of the sites of the water monitoring programm ein Nordland county.

Page 2: NGU - BULL 427. 1995 Arve Misutu), David BanksNGU -BULL 427, 1995 Arve Misund, David Banks & Patrice de Caritat 85 Table 1. Major components at the monitored sources in Nordland county,

84 Arve Misund , David Banks & Patrice de Caritat NGU - BULL 427. 1995

• 10 · lto IIIft1,'L

• 100 · 1000 meq, l

• I · 10 mtq 'L

1 ASl IOOURNF. ( I'n pud)2: SClfWY.t>rHS ~I.VHR.'Ii (I~pand)3 IIIGln M 1l SP RINO (SOldaod).. rrnClV.l 1 l l Y (Scut.l.ud)~ IJA.lJ .YGOW AN (llUm:l )6 VOI.VlC (t't-x)7 VIa IV CdcstiDsTPranc-c)8 PE RRll!R. (P rutt)9 \ 'TITI:J. GtMdc. So.ro: (I 'ratIIX)IQ V1'ITEl.. IItpu (fraAa)11 £V1AN (F-.:e)U P.NSlM'HJl seoer- «( ioumaa,)13 t"ORST BlSt.lAn OlJl:J.l J! (GC'JlIWlJ)14 AP()IJJ :'o4AJl1.~ «(jc~)

LS RAR -I..J:::'..DllC (Nc.tbcrimd)16 SO IAN UI! ('A RRAS (Spain)17 SJ"A Rt'Uloe (Dclp u. )18 OAVIllA (haIy)19 RAms (SbooWa )2D IlI Rl.lTP. (blluam.a)21 VYT AllTAS (U OauaaUi)22 nmO ()() RA OUI!U.J! (Jl WIpJ'y)Z3 ....."""'SKl'I ,.i7."ffi (Cad)24 KA Rl .o vy VARY (Cmcb)2:S t'RA1oo"'llSUlVY I.£l1'on (D:cd:l )26 ,,"TIOM (Cndl)zt SARZAN (R.Aa)l8 BORJOMI (a.-ia)29 RAJ"iLU.'it\ (s--oka):lO VIOfY I~ (JWand)3 1 I lA KJIDS Klll)I!Vi\N~ (lknmart)

12 "A RRIS (Nor-rlD KATIDAlJ~"l~)

}4 lOROPJ.Vl lAV (Nofway)lS 1~"VAN1'oi l!r (No rw;a,)36 NOR.S.K RRI!VAN."i~)

37 SAL'o..~RY CAJl~>ONIA."'i (Sa:JtJud)3K [}UXTO~ (I!..p.od)'B SKAUVO(J. fNl-'a ,)40 Vl i\TIU1 MiKKVA.'il'oi (Norway).n sroRvM~m (Sor-y)42 C.oJl!RSXOCiKJ1:J£'Ir;~)

• O · l_tq lL11

i ··"1<41 - .40

Oll

.'

." I."••

~I10.." 2. e 17." . lO "..,.

er (100%)(r,Rr-,NOj )

EXPANDED DUROV DIAGRAM

Fig. 3. Durov diagram showing cations (as percentages) along the top and anions along the side (modified after Misund & Banks,1994). Total mineral content ([cations + anions]/2) is indicated by the symbol size. This diagram allows distinction between the 'end­member' water types, Le. calcium-bicarbonate (e.g., from carbonate rocks, top left), sodium-ca lcium-bicarbonate (e.g.• typical of gra­nitic/acidic rocks, top right) and sodium-chloride (e.g. influenced by seawater, bottom right). and intermediate types. Data for themore famous mineral water types are from Green & Green (1985). The Nordland waters described in this study are nos. 33, 34, 35,39, 40, 41 and 42.

Discussion and conclusionsThe EEC Mineral Water Directive emphasizesthat: "The composition, temperature and otheressential characteristics of natural mineral watermust remain stable at source within the limits ofnatural fluctuation; in particular, they must not beaffected by possible variations in the rate offlow." This Directive is mainly concerned withbacterial pollution. The values of the major cati­ons, for which no upper limits are stipulated, mayfar exceed the standards enshrined in theDrinking Water Directive (80/778/EEC). For theKattdalen spring, the fluctuation in dischargethroughout the year varies from 1 I/sec to 25I/sec. In arctic Norway, in contrast to most tem­perate lands, groundwater recharge (and thusgroundwater levels and discharges) often rea­ches a minimum in winter due to the frozen

ground and accumulation of precipitation assnow cover (Kirkhusmo 1986, Haldorsen et al.1992). A seasonal variation of the chemical para­meters is also observed, and whether these vari­ations are within the limits of the term 'stable' ofthe Mineral Water Directive is an open question.These variations are, in any event, effected by"the rate of flow".

The monitoring programme has shown that allthe analysed springs meet the standards set bythe EEC Drinking Water Directive. Taking intoconsideration water quality, location and flowrate, the Jordelvhav spring stands out as themost promising candidate for commercial pro­duction of bottled water. The Kattdalen spring isvery well investigated (e.g. Misund et al. 1994),but has a low flow rate in winter and is not sofavourably located from a logistical point of view.

Page 3: NGU - BULL 427. 1995 Arve Misutu), David BanksNGU -BULL 427, 1995 Arve Misund, David Banks & Patrice de Caritat 85 Table 1. Major components at the monitored sources in Nordland county,

NGU - BULL 427, 1995 Arve Misund, David Banks & Patrice de Caritat 85

Table 1. Major compo nents at the monito red sources in Nordland county , sampled betwee n 15 February 1993 and 15 February 1994(all values in mg/L , excep t discharge in I!sec, conductivity in [AS/cm and alkalinity in mmol/I). Q = Quaternary, K = Karst , L = Lake. Forthe first four sites n (no. of samples) =14, for the last three n=8.

Jordel vhav Kattdalen Skauvoll Gjers kog- Isvannet Vestre Stor-kjele n Nc kkvan n vannet

min max min max min max min max min max min max min max

Type Q K K Q L L L

Discharge 6.7 40 24 > 10 1 30

Conductiv . 38 .3 99 .2 315 386 94.8 159 79.9 104 15.3 23.2 35 .7 61.4 43.5 63.5

pH 7.5 7.8 7.7 8.4 7.7 8.1 6.9 7.6 6.4 6.9 5.6 6.4 5.4 5.8

Alkalinity 0.3 0.6 2.6 3.1 0.5 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.06 0.08 0.01 0.03 0 0.02

Ca2+ 3.5 10.7 48.8 54.8 11.6 23.9 7.7 11.4 1.2 1.7 1.0 1.2 0.9 1.8

Mg2+ 1.1 3.5 8.3 15.2 0.2 1.7 1.1 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.1 0.7 1.0

Na- 1.7 4.6 4.1 6.9 4.9 11.4 5.0 5.9 0.9 1.5 4.3 8.6 5.5 8.5

K+ <0.2 0.6 <0.2 1.9 <0.2 1.1 <0.2 1.8 <0.2 0.7 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2<0.2

HC0 3- 16.5 37 .8 160 191 30.5 75.6 17.7 31.7 3.7 4.9 0.6 1.8 0 1.2

CI- 2.1 17.4 6.8 20.9 7.1 26 .9 9.1 16.8 1.3 3.3 6.2 15.9 8.2 16.8

SOi - 1.2 2.5 7.8 50 .5 3.0 4.7 3.5 5.4 1.3 1.5 2.2 3.3 2.4 3.5

N03- 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.1 1.9 0.5 0.6

Generally speaking, the waters that have beenmonitored in Nordland county have very low totalmineral contents. This is not necessarily a disad­vantage ; different water types suit different cultu­res. While East Europeans are used to drinkingsemi-seawater, low salinity waters, such as tho­se from Nordland, are preferred by theJapanese . Kattdalen and Jordelvhav springwaters are classified as calcium-bicarbonatewaters with low mineral content, and manyScandinavians may find it preferable to the moremineral-rich Norwegian mineral water, Farris.For a sodium-chloride type of water with a lowermineral content than Farris, possible candidatesare the Vestre Nekkvann water or the Storvannetwater (nos. 40 and 41 in Fig. 3).

The three sources from coastal high-mountainlakes are not to be recognised as natural mineralwater , thus there is no need for raw water qualitydocumentat ion. Water from these lakes can becommercialised as 'packaged water' or 'generalwater'. Indeed, the EEC Drinking Water Directiveallows the packaging and marketing of water"from any source, including water which is knownto be bacterologically unsafe in its raw state andwhich has a significant proportion of waste waterin its make-up, as long as it can satisfy the che­mical and bacteriological standards after treat­ment" (Finlayson 1992). The analyses of theselake waters indicate a very high quality, althoughthe pH is somewhat low.

AcknowledgementsThis study in Nordland county has been funded by the'Nordlandsprogrammet' at the Geo logical Survey of Norway(NGU). Thanks are due to Stein-Erik Lauritzen, BergenUniversity , who has been involved in the work at Kattdalenspring.

References

Finlayson , D.M. 1992: Chemica l standards app lied to natur almineral waters and packaged wate rs. Soc. Chem. IndustrySymp.'Natural Mineral Waters and Packaged Waters'.26/ 11/92, London, 20 pp.

Green , M. & Green , T. 1985: The good water guide . RosendalPress, London, 172 pp.

Haldorsen, S., Englund, J-O ., Jcr gensen, P., Kirkhusmo, L.A& Hongve, D. 1992: Groun dwater contribution to a moun­tain stream channe l, Hedmark, Norway. Nor. geol. unders.Bull . 422, 3-14.

Kirkhusmo, L. A (ed.) 1986: The use of GroundwaterMon itoring Data from the Nordic countries . NordicHydrological Programme, NHP-Report 19 , 36 pp.

Misund, A & Banks, D. 1994: The Hydrogeochemistry ofBottled Water. Geoscientist 4, 20-23 .

Misund, A , Car itat, P.de., Lauritzen , S.E. & Bakke, S. 1994 :Monitor ing of water quality in Nordland Cou nty, Norway.IAH-Conference: Down Under 94, Adelaide, Australia.Extended abstract, 7 pp.

Sosialdepartementet 1977: Foreskrift om omsetning av dri kke­vann. (Direct ive on monitoring and samp ling of water forconsumption) . Sosialdepartementet, Oslo, 8 pp.