Models Corp Govern
-
Upload
shivashankar-sg -
Category
Documents
-
view
16 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Models Corp Govern
PROF.SHIVASHANKAR
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MODELS
2
Overview of Corporate Governance
MODELS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate governance systems vary
around the world. This because in some cases, corporate governance focuses on link between a shareholder and company, some on formal board structures and board practices and yet others on social responsibilities of corporations.
However, basically, corporate governance is seen as the process by which organizations are run.
4
Some Definitions“Corporate Governance is the system by
which companies are directed and controlled…”
Cadbury Report (UK), 1992“…to do with Power and Accountability:
who exercises power, on behalf of whom, how the exercise of power is controlled.”
Sir Adrian Cadbury, in Reflections on Corporate Governance, Ernest Sykes Memorial Lecture, 1993
5
A Canadian Definition“…the process and structure..to direct and
manage the business and affairs of the corporation with the objective of enhancing shareholder value, which includes ensuring the financial viability of the business….”
Where were the Directors? Guidelines for Improved Corporate Governance in Canada, TSE, 1994
6
An OECD Definition“Corporate governance involves a set of
relationships between a company’s management, its board, its shareholders and other stakeholders ..also the structure through which objectives of the company are set, and the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance are determined.”
Preamble to the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, 2004
7
An Indian Definition“…fundamental objective of corporate
governance is the ‘enhancement of the long-term shareholder value while at the same time protecting the interests of other stakeholders.”
SEBI (Kumar Mangalam Birla) Report on Corporate Governance, January, 2000
8
A Gandhian Definition
Trusteeship obligations inherent in company operations, where assets and resources are pooled and entrusted to the managers for optimal utilisation in the stakeholders’ interests.
9
Some Further DefinitionsCorporate governance is essentially about
leadership:leadership for efficiency;leadership for probity;leadership with responsibility; andleadership which is transparent and which is
accountable.- PRINCIPLES FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE COMMONWEALTH
10
What is Corporate Governance?The Manner in which a Corporation is Run
Achieving its ObjectivesTransparency of its OperationsAccountability & ReportingGood Corporate Citizenship
The Processes & Operating Relationships that Best Achieve Organisational Goals
11
Some Governance ModelsFinance or the Principal-Agent Model
Markets for Capital, Managerial Talent and Corporate Control, Key determinant
In general, profit-maximisation goal is co-functional with social-welfare-maximisation
Shareholders as Residual Claimants have superior control rights
12
Exclusive Accountability toShareholdersRisk-bearing EntrepreneursResidual ClaimantsWinding-up Ranking: Last in Pecking OrderBoards Appointed by ShareholdersNon-congruence of Stakeholder Interests
13
Residual Claimant Theory
“…shareholders … residual claimants to the firm’s income. Creditors have fixed claims and employees’ remunerations … negotiated in advance of performance .. Gains and losses from abnormally good or bad performance .. The lot of shareholders, who stand last in the queue .. Shareholders make discretionary decisions and bear consequences .. As such, .. Owners of business with important control rights…”
The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Frank H Easterbrook and Daniel R Fischel (1991) OUP
14
The Stakeholder CaseFirm Objective must be defined more
widely than just shareholder-value-maximisation, since risk capital is not the only, or even the major input
Residual Claimant Rights Not Universally Valid, eg, Circumscribed in case of pre-bankruptcy (US Chapter XI) Situations
Other Such: Employees with Firm-specific Specialised Skills, Customers/Vendors with Substantial Stake in the Business, etc
15
Towards an Integrated ModelOne-Size does not Fit All CircumstancesA Combination of Shareholder/Stakeholder
Models NecessarySome Argue, While Shareholder Claim Well
Established, Stakeholder Claims Need to be Proved
Tailor Model to Suit Unique Circumstances
16
The Corporate BoardCentral to Corporate Governance
Juxtaposed between Shareholders on the one hand, and on the other, Managers of the Entity (Cadbury)
Follows Distancing between Ownership and Control (Berle and Means)
Trustee for All ShareholdersLoyalty & Commitment – Always to Company
17
Board Role & ResponsibilityProvide/ Exercise
Leadership and Strategic GuidanceObjective Judgement Independent of
ManagementControl over the Company
Direct and Control the Management of the Company
Be Accountable at all times to All Shareholders
18
Dimensions of Board ResponsibilityDirection involves
Formulation & Review of Company Policies, Strategies, Budgets and Plans, Risk Management Policies, Top Level HR Policies, etc
Setting Objectives & Monitoring PerformanceOversight of Acquisitions, Divestitures,
Projects, Financial and Legal Compliance, etc
19
Dimensions of Board ResponsibilityControl Involves
Prescribing Codes of Conduct, Overseeing Disclosure & Communication
Processes,Ensuring Control Systems to Protect
Company AssetsReviewing Performance & Realigning Action
Initiatives to Achieve Company Objectives
20
Dimensions of Board ResponsibilityAccountability Involves
Creating, Protecting and Enhancing Company Wealth and Resources
Timely and Transparent ReportingGood Corporate Citizenry including Discharge
of Stakeholder Obligations and Societal Responsibilities without Compromising the Shareholder Wealth Maximisation Goal
21
Corporate Governance & Capital Market Drivers: A Conceptual Framework
Listed Corporations(The Board & the Executive)
Regulators Government Stock Exchanges (SEBI/RBI) Legislation Listing Agreements
Market Operators Institutional Investors Press/Media (Rewards) (Pension Funds/Insce Cos) (Opinion Makers)
Lenders(Banks/
Depositors)
Shareholders/Stakeholders
REGULATION & LEGISLATION
Market Operations, Critique & Monitoring
Environment Social
Economic
An Enterprise’s Triple Effect on Society
BusinessImpact
Sustainable Development Equal Opportunities
Waste Control Education & Culture
Emissions Community Regeneration
Energy Use Human Rights
Product EmployeeLife-cycle Volunteers
Product Wealth Productive Ethical Value Generation Employment Trading
23
The Triple-Bottomline Impact
Business Impact
environment society
economics
24
Governance Orientation Matrix
MODELS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
There is no one model of corporate governance which is universally acceptable as each model has its own advantages and disadvantages.
The following are some of the models of corporate governance :
Anglo-American model German model Japanese model Indian model
Market-Based Corporate Governance SystemCorporate governance systems have
developed differently throughout the world. The market-based corporate governance system is based on Anglo-American law. Since the markets are the primary source of capital, investors are given the most power in determining corporate policies. Therefore, the system relies on the capital markets to exert control over the corporation's
Market Model of Corporate Governance System
A system relying on the investors of a firm to exert control over how the corporation is to be managed. A market-based corporate governance system defines the responsibilities of the different participants in the company, including shareholders, the board of directors, management, employees, suppliers and customers.
Anglo-American model This model is also called an ‘Anglo-Saxon model’ Used as corporate governance in U.S.A, U.K, Canada,
Australia, and some common wealth countries. The shareholders appoint directors who in turn appoint
the managers to manage the business. Thus there is separation of ownership and control. The board usually consist of executive directors and few
independent directors. The board often has limited ownership stakes in the company.
A single individual holds both the position of CEO and chairman of the board. This system (model) relies on effective communication between shareholders, board and management with all important decisions taken after getting approval of shareholders (by voting).
German model This is also called as 2 tier board model There are 2 boards viz. The supervisory board and the anagement
board. Used in countries like Germany, Holland,
France, etc. Usually a large majority of shareholders are
banks and financial institutions. The shareholder can appoint only 50% of
members to constitute the supervisory board. The rest is appointed by employees and labor
unions.
Japanese modelThis is also called as the business network model,
usually shareholders are banks/financial institutions, large family shareholders, corporate with cross-shareholding.
There is supervisory board which is made up of board of directors and a president, who are jointly appointed by shareholder and banks/financial institutions.
This is rejection of the Japanese ‘keiretsu’- a form of cultural relationship among family controlled corporate and groups of complex interlocking business relationship, where cross shareholding is common most of the directors are heads of different divisions of the company. Outside director or independent directors are rarely found of the board.
Indian modelThe model of corporate governances found in India is
a mix of the Anglo-American and German models. This is because in India, there are three types of
Corporation viz. private companies, public companies and public sectors undertakings (which includes statutory companies, government companies, banks and other kinds of financial institutions).
Each of these corporation have a distinct pattern of shareholding. For e.g. In case of companies, the promoter and his family have almost complete control over the company.
They depend less on outside equity capital. Hence in private companies the German model of corporate governance is followed.
The OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State Owned Enterprises
Louis Bouchez
Corporate Affairs Division, OECD
Delhi, India
16 - 17 February 2006
The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the OECD or its Member countries
Outline1. Rationale for developing the Guidelines2. Process and main characteristics3. Priorities in the Guidelines4. A new pillar to the OECD corporate
governance work5. The Asian Network on corporate governance
of SOEs
1. Rationale for developing the GuidelinesScale and scope of the state sectorImpact of SOEs on economic performancePressure for reform deriving from globalization
and liberalizationSpecific governance challengesExpected benefits from improvements of SOE
governanceStrong demand from non-OECD economies
2. Process and main characteristicsExtensive and inclusive consultations with
relevant players from OECD members and non-member countries (Paris 2004)
The Guidelines: are non-binding and non-prescriptiveare complementary to the OECD Principles
of Corporate Governancedo not preclude/alter privatization policiesare based on a Comparative Report
3. Priorities in the Guidelines
3.1 Ensure a level-playing field with the private sector
3.2 Reinforce the ownership function within the state administration
3.3 Improve transparency of SOEs’ objectives and performance
3.4 Strengthen and empower SOE boards3.5 Provide equitable treatment of non-
controlling / minority shareholders
3.1 Ensure a level-playing field with the private sectorSeparate regulation and the shareholding
functionTransparency of special obligationsHarmonization in legal formsMore flexibility in capital structuresCompetitive conditions in access to finance
3.2 Reinforce ownership functionwithin the state administration
Centralization / coordination of the ownership function
Clear and disclosed ownership policyNo direct interference in day-to-day
activitiesLet boards carry out their responsibilitiesAccountability securedEffective exercise of ownership rights
3.3 Improve transparency of SOEs’ objectives and performanceConsistent and aggregate disclosureReinforced internal auditIndependent external auditHigh quality standards for accounting and
auditDisclosure as listed companiesDisclosure of material information, including
financial assistance from the state, transactions with related entities and risk factors
3.4 Strengthen and empower SOE boardsStructured and skill-based nomination
processClear mandate and full responsibilityAble to appoint CEOAble to exercise independent judgment
limit number of state representatives on the board
separation between Chair and CEOSystematic evaluation of board
3.5 Provide equitable treatment of non-controlling minority shareholdersImportant for State’s capacity to attract
outside fundingImpact on valuation of SOEsRelevant for the general perception of the
State as an ownerPrevents the State pursuing objectives outside
the SOE’s interests
4. A new pillar to the OECD CG workDissemination and discussion in non-OECD countries
Priority topic in both the Asian and Russian Roundtable Dedicated country meeting and policy dialogue in China,
Ukraine and EgyptPresentation of the Guidelines in other Roundtables (MENA,
Latin America, SEE and Eurasia)Follow-up on OECD country work
Co-operation on Korean reformsThematic issues such as aggregate reporting on
nomination and evaluation for SOE boards
5. The Asian Network on CG of SOEs
Initiated in May 2005 as new activity of the Asian Roundtable on CG, in order to:Raise awareness on CG of SOEsEvaluate existing CG policy framework of SOEsInfluence policymaking in Asia by providing a forum for peer
policymakersSupport CG reforms in SOE
The Asian Network will meet in 2006 and 2007 to discuss each of the 6 chapters of the Guidelines
Intention to draft (i) a Policy Brief providing concrete policy recommendations and (ii) a comparative report
OECD MEMBERS
Country AUSTRALIA7 June 1971 AUSTRIA29 September 1961 BELGIUM13 September 1961 CANADA10 April 1961 CHILE7 May 2010 CZECH REPUBLIC21 December 1995
OECD MEMBERS DENMARK30 May 1961 ESTONIA9 December 2010 FINLAND28 January 1969 FRANCE7 August 1961 GERMANY27 September 1961 GREECE27 September 1961 HUNGARY7 May 1996 ICELAND5 June 1961 IRELAND17 August 1961
OECD MEMBERSISRAEL7 September 2010 ITALY29 March 1962 JAPAN28 April 1964 KOREA12 December 1996 LUXEMBOURG7 December 1961 MEXICO18 May 1994 NETHERLANDS13 November 1961 NEW ZEALAND29 May 1973 NORWAY4 July 1961
OECD MEMBERSPOLAND22 November 1996 PORTUGAL4 August 1961 SLOVAK REPUBLIC14 December 2000 SLOVENIA21 July 2010 SPAIN3 August 1961 SWEDEN28 September 1961 SWITZERLAND28 September 1961 TURKEY2 August 1961 UNITED KINGDOM2 May 1961 UNITED STATES12 April 1961