Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
-
Upload
euracio-mella -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
1/21
Modelling of hydrocyclone performance based on
spray profile analysis
J.S.J. van Deventera,*, D. Fenga, K.R.P. Petersenb, C. Aldrichb
a
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliabDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland,
Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa
Received 26 February 2002; received in revised form 21 December 2002; accepted 31 December 2002
Abstract
Spray profile measurements can be used to calculate the underflow rate, and consequently, be
related to hydrocyclone performance. The flow geometry of the spray discharge is found to arise
from velocity patterns at the outlet orifice. Through a videographic example of an industrialhydrocyclone, it is shown that underflow profiles are typically parabolic, a feature which is
indicative of the velocity at which the fluid exits. The inclusion of gravity in this model clearly
highlights deficiencies in currently used models. Moreover, an intimate knowledge of factors
affecting the profiles of the underflow of a cyclone is essential for the correct interpretation of
videographic images. Subsequently, image data are used to estimate outlet velocities, which give an
excellent insight into various fluid mechanical phenomena that are not appreciated by analysing
basic operational variables. The exit velocities are used to calculate underflow rates, which are
related to mass recovery in the underflow.
D 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:hydrocyclone; spray profile; modelling; image analysis; underflow
1. Introduction
Sensing technology applied to hydrocyclone monitoring is now a fruitful area of
research, while machine vision has been a relatively latecomer to the field. Petersen
(1993) investigated the use of electrical impedance tomography, where a current
0301-7516/03/$ - see front matterD 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00002-4
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +61-3-8344-6620; fax: +61-3-8344-4153.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J.S.J. van Deventer).
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijminpro
Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
2/21
applied through the main body of a vessel gave rise to a resistance measurement. This
technique was applied to the outlet of an atomizer, producing accurate air core
diameter measurements. In a more sophisticated investigation, Van Latum (1992)
suggested the use of X-ray imaging to scan cross sections of a dense media cyclonebody to measure density profiles. Williams (1995) made use of two-dimensional
electrical impedance tomography to map physical objects in plane sections throughout
the main body of circular vessels. However, this system was hampered by low
resolving power so that typical features in the main body of a hydrocyclone could
not be mapped with any certainty. This technique was also adapted to estimate spray
angles (Williams et al., 1995). Computed air core areas could be related to feed flow
rate, which was in turn experimentally related to discharge angles. The use of the spray
angle in this investigation was to demonstrate that computed tomography could detect
malfunctions rather than using information from the spray angle itself. Although these
and other approaches have met with various degrees of success, adoption by industry
has not materialised at this stage. However, it is expected that nonintrusive sensor
technology will eventually play a major role in process monitoring, particularly with
improved robustness, which is necessary for the harsh industrial environment. Machine
vision has the advantage of being both nonintrusive and noncontact, and industrially
robust cameras are readily available.
While it is well known that the underflow implicitly characterises hydrocyclone
vortex flow and operation variables, little has been done to exploit this information for
performance estimation. Viljoen (1993) showed that the underflow discharge spray
angle correlates with inlet feed distribution size, and more importantly, applied thisinformation to predict a cut size parameter defined as percent 75 Am. Theunderflow meter has been developed into a fully operational system, and implemented
at various locations. The investigation by Del Villar et al. (1996) is similar to that of
Viljoen in that a soft-sensor approach was used to predict cut size. For purposes of
automatic control, a soft-sensor incorporating a neutral network was used to predict
the percent 45 Am of the hydrocyclone overflow. The major advantage of thisapproach is that existing on-line measurements are used as inputs for the soft-sensor.
The broader implication arising from this investigation is that soft-sensor-based
hydrocyclone control is a value-added technology that is quickly finding its place
in industry. It naturally follows from this investigation that visual sensing of hydro-cyclone underflows can play an important role in subsequent soft-sensor monitoring
and control strategies, based on the relationship between the underflow spray angle
and the classification characteristics of the hydrocyclone. The benefit arises from the
ability of such a system to provide an array of services on-line without the need for
several other sensors. Moreover, in contrast to Viljoens (1993) underflow meter,
noncontact measurement ensures that reliability and accuracy do not degrade as a
result of process conditions, a problem commonly experienced with most other contact
devices.
The aim of this paper is to mathematically describe the spray angle profile typically
observed in industrial images and to incorporate the effect of gravity on the profile. In thisway a robust description of the spray angle can be used to back-calculate exit velocities in
order to simulate hydrocyclone performance.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203184
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
3/21
2. Theoretical background
One of the first equations for the atomizer spray angle was presented by Taylor
(1948),
cosh wU
xffiffiffi
2p
yz2
1z23=21
2
1
z21
lnz
1
where w = axial velocity at outlet, U= overall head velocity, z= air core radius/outlet
radius at the outlet, x = axial velocity/overall head velocity at the outlet, and y = angular
velocity/(outlet radius
overall head velocity).
This equality for the spray angle is derived under the assumption that the cosine ofthe spray angle is a simple relationship between the overall velocity and the axial
velocity. As will be shown later, this is only approximately true at the immediate outlet,
but in general incorrect, as vortex fluid flow through an orifice is complicated by
torsional geometry. Dombrowski and Hasson (1969) transformed the above equation to
show that the spray angle is independent of inlet conditions (velocity and pressure) and
dependent only upon vessel dimensions. However, this is only the case for a vessel
which is being operated at near maximum inlet pressure conditions (a maximum spray
angle reaches).
This phenomenon (spray angle is independent of inlet pressures after certain levels)
was verified more recently by Dumouchel et al. (1993) who theoretically showed that
after a certain point (inlet pressure), an increase in initial fluid spin (tangential/radial
velocity ratio) results in a small or negligible increase in the tangential velocity at the
Fig. 1. Hydrocyclone underflow showing the fluid flow in a predominately tangential direction.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 185
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
4/21
atomizer outlet. An integral part of their investigation was to predict spray angles from
theoretical analysis and to compare to experimental results. They used the most widely
accepted equation for swirling fluid through an outlet, which is
h2arctan vw
2
where v and w are the tangential and axial velocities, respectively. Intuitively, this
equation is acceptable, considering that the two major features contributing to the
resulting angle, the axial and tangential velocities, are represented. However, as with
the atomizer, the predicted spray angle assumes that the tangential velocity is in a
direction perpendicular to the outlet. Visual inspection of hydrocyclone operation
reveals that pulp flow at the underflow exits in a predominantly tangential orientation.
Fig. 1 clearly supports this, showing the streamlines in a tangential orientation (due topoor reproduction quality, this is indicated by the solid black lines).
3. Spray angle model
3.1. Model development
This section will set up a three-component vector system that refers to individual points
on the outer spray edge. Combining all reference points constitutes the observed spray angle
profile. Fig. 2 represents a quarter section of the hydrocyclone/atomizer outlet, with theobserver looking from the bottom and up into the vessel. Consider a stream of fluid
originating from point #1 which is directed in a tangential path with respect to the outlet. Due
to a radial velocity component, the fluid flow is now directed at an angle x, from the original
tangential direction along the vector labelled with componentsm and c. If the spray profile is
observed tangentially at point #2, fluid from #1 will make a contribution to this profile. Now,
Fig. 2. Geometry of fluid flow as seen at the outlet of a hydrocyclone or atomizer. Fluid stream is expelled in a
tangential and radial direction.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203186
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
5/21
considering that this contribution from point #1 is elevated toward the reader, then the
elevation of vectorq +p will describe the angle from the outlet edge to the point on the spray
discharge surface. This calculation is performed at all of the angular positions, b, which will
be affected by this particular fluid stream. Effectively, this is the same as calculating theprofile from a single point on the underflow outlet circumference and describing the
contribution to the spray profile of fluid flow streams at an angle b away. As indicated in Fig.
2, the fluid stream from point #1 will make no contribution to the profile at 90j(they2-axis)
since they2-axis is parallel with the fluid streamline, whenx = 0.
All of the labelled vectors are found as follows fromFig. 2.At points #1 and #2, the y1-
and y2-coordinates arey1 = r, y2 = 0 and y1 = rcosb, y2 = rsinb, respectively.
Therefore, dis given by
d
r
rcosb
r
1
cosb
3
Now, the vectorq can be found from the vectordas follows.
cosb = d/q, therefore
q r1cosbcosb
4
Now,
q2 s2 d2 5
s2 r21cosb2
cos2b r21cosb2
s2 r21cosb2 1cos2b
1
s
r
1
cosb
1
cos2b
1 1=2
r
1
cosb
tanb
Vectorm
mcosxrsinbr1cosbtanbrtanb 6
m rtanbcosx
Vector f
msinxf rtanbtanxVectors p and c
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 187
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
6/21
Inspecting the region bounded by the vectorsp,c and fa little more closely as shown in
Fig. 3, a right angle triangle can be completed by using the vectors e and l.
psinbland ccosxlZp ccosx
sinb
Now, to find c,
pcosbfertanbtanxcsinx
c rcosx
tan2btanx
1tanbtanx
7
Therefore,
p rcosb
tanbtanx
1tanbtanx
8
The vertical height from the plane of the outlet is given by the vectorzas shown inFig. 4.
z mctanurtanucosx
tanb
1tanbtanx
9
q
p
r
1cosbcosb
tanbtanx
cosbsinbtanx 10The two vectors zand q +p, Eqs. (9) and (10), give sufficient description to formulate an
equation for the discharge spray angle. The form of the equation is given by
h2arctan BqpBz
11
where h is the tangent angle to the outer surface of the spray discharge measured along
with vector (p + q) and the differential of (q +p) with respect tozgives the gradient of the
outer surface of the spray discharge. Now, both vectors are independent of each other and
Fig. 3. Section ofFig. 2with added vectors e and l.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203188
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
7/21
are only dependent on the angular distance, b. Therefore, the following computation is
performed to find this differential.
BqpBz
BqpBb
Bb
Bz
Now,
Bz
Bbrtanu
cosxcosbsinbtanx2
ZBb
Bz cosx
rtanucosbsinbtanx2 12
and
BqpBb
rK2cos2b
Ksinbsecbtanx 13
Therefore, the combined result becomes
BqpBz
cosxtanu
Ksinbsecbtanx vw
sinbuv
secb1sin2btanbh i
14
where the equalities K=(1 tanb tanx), tanu=x/vx
, tanx = u/v, cosx= v/vx
have been
used to incorporate the three-dimensional velocity components, u, w, vx
, which are the
radial, axial and along the line of flow velocities, respectively. The final form of the
equation for the discharge spray angle is given by
h2arctan vw
sinbuv
secb1sin2btanbh i
15
Fig. 4.The two sections of the fluid flow geometry. The left-hand diagram is the elevation of the fluid stream in
Fig. 2.The right-hand diagram shows the angle X that is made from the plane of the outlet to the elevated fluid
stream.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 189
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
8/21
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
9/21
changing with position due to the effect of gravity. Incorporating a gravity term requires
the expression for the vertical height, z, to be altered.
Horizontal vector component:
Sx
Uxt
Ucosut
Vertical vector component:
SyzUyt12
agt2 Usinut1
2agt
2
SyztanuSx12
agS2x
U2cos2u
where Uis the overall velocity with corresponding horizontal and vertical components of
Ux and Uy, and Sx and Syare the horizontal and vertical vector components, respectively.
With reference toFig. 4(left), the horizontal component,Sx, can be replaced by the m + cvector, which gives
Syz rtanutanbKcosx
T r2tan2b
K2cos2x
whereK= 1 tanbtanxand T=(1/2)(ag/U2cos2x).Therefore, the two reference vectors forthe spray edge are given by
z rtanutanbKcosx
T r2tan2b
K2cos2x 16
qpr 1cosbcosb
tanbtanxcosbsinbtanx
17
Fig. 6. Typical industrial hydrocyclone underflow. The curved effect of the underflow is clearly shown on the left
spray edge.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 191
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
10/21
Following the same steps as in the previous section, the vectors z and q +p can be
manipulated to find the discharge spray angle. The final result becomes
BbBz
K3
cos2
xrKtanusec2b2Tr2tanbsec2b 18
and
BqpBb
rK2cos2b
Ksinbsecbtanx 19
Therefore,
B
q
p
Bz Kcos2
x
Ksinb
secbtanx
Ktanucosx2Trtanb 20
BqpBz
v2 uvtanb"h
1uv
tanbi
sinbuv
secb
wvuwtanb agrtanb
# 21
where the equalities tanu= w/vx
, tanx= u/v and cosx= v/vx
have been substituted to
reveal the axial, tangential, fluid flow projection, radial and fluid stream velocity,w,v,vx
,
u and U, respectively. Finally, the discharge spray angle is given by the relation
h2arctan vutanb vutanbsinbusecbwvuwtanb agrtanb 22
This equation gives a general description of the discharge phenomenon. If the gravity
term,ag, is set to zero, Eq. (22) reduces to Eq. (15) as required. Fig. 7shows a comparison
between the two results derived thus far. Using velocity values ofu = 0 m/s,v= 0.5 m/s and
w = 0.5 m/s (radial component omitted), outlet radius of 1 cm and a total ofb = 85jvalues,
Fig. 7. The effect of including gravity forces in the spray angle calculation (outlet radius is 1 cm).
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203192
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
11/21
the upper line shows the model without the gravity effect and the lower line shows the
model with the gravity correction included.Fig. 7reveals significant gravity effects within
the 40 12 cm cross section.The gravity affected profile inFig. 7can be classified into three separate regions. The
initial upward curved region is the first. The second is the relatively flat, downward
sloping region after the initial curve. Thirdly, the second region then connects to a second
downward curving region where gravity forces are dominant. These three stages are shown
schematically in Fig. 8. As defined by Dombrowski and Hasson (1969), the discharge
spray angle is defined in this flat, second region.
The model can now be used for theoretical spray angle prediction and compared to
experimental data.
3.3. Features of the new model
The equations presented above give a detailed, robust description of the spray discharge
geometry. These results have the potential to be used widely in vortex simulation
investigations where the exiting discharge spray angle can be used to predict the three
components of fluid velocity.
For all practical purposes, the radial component of (Eqs. (16), (17) and (22) is notrequired for use in hydrocyclone spray angle calculation. The essential aspects of these
equations that could benefit most studies in vortex fluid flow through orifices would be
gravity effects and the tangential and axial velocity components. Therefore, upon
simplification, (Eqs. (16), (17) and (22) become
xr 1cosbcosb
23
z
rwtanb
v
agr2tan2b
2v2
24
h2arctan v
2sinb
wvagrtanb
25
Fig. 8. Conceptual spray profile: defining flat region and maximum b value.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 193
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
12/21
3.3.1. Spray angle uniqueness
The ability ofthe model (Eqs. (23)(25)) to find unique values for the exit velocities is
demonstrated inFig. 9where the x- and z-coordinates, i.e. spray profile (from Eqs. (23)
and (24)) are plotted for r=0.1 m, v= 2.5 m/s, w = 1.5 m/s and forv=5 m/s, w = 3 m/s.Even though both profiles have the same v/w ratio, they become increasingly different
further from the outlet. Moreover, it is not possible to adjust the axial velocity (of either
profile) such that both curves lie on top of each other. Evidently, the signature of gravity
facilitates the estimation of outlet velocities from spray angle profiles. However, some care
must be taken when applying this technique. At relatively high exit velocities, the task of
finding a unique set of outlet values becomes more difficult, since the effect of gravity is
less significant in the near vicinity of the outlet. This problem could be overcome by using
a greater extent of the spray profile to the point where gravity forces begin to dominate.
However, in most systems, liquid sheet breakup also occurs, and consequently causes a
deviation of the fluid trajectory due to changes in momentum.
3.3.2. Comparing new model with Eq. (2)
The apparent simplicity involved in predicting spray angle profiles belies the complex-
ity of the process, especially considering that accurate data are difficult to obtain and there
is an absence of literature for comparative purposes. In spite of these limitations, a
comparison of Eq. (25) to the most widely used equation (Eq. (2)) using a range of typical
operating values will serve for comparative purposes.
Using an axial velocity ofw = 2 m/s, a tangential velocity range ofv= 0.5 m/s tov= 10
m/s is used to calculate spray angle values for Eqs. (2) and (25). Fig. 10shows the resultswhere two outlet radii,r= 0.05 m andr= 0.005 m, have been used in order to show effects
in vessels of differing scale, viz. hydrocyclones and atomizers.
Fig. 10clearly shows that when the outlet radius, gravity effects and the geometry of
the outlet flow are considered (Eq. (25)), calculated spray angles can considerably differ to
Fig. 9. Two examples of a spray profile (model: Eqs. (23) and (24)) using different values for tangential and axial
velocities, but having the same tangential/axial velocity ratio. This shows that profiles have unique sets of exit
velocities.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203194
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
13/21
those obtained with Eq. (2). At a tangential velocity of 2 m/s and an outlet radius of 0.05
m, Eq. (2) indicates that spray angles will be over predicted by approximately 20j. The
other conclusion is that discrepancies between the two models become more significant
when using larger systems, such as a hydrocyclone. In the case of the 0.005-m outlet,
pressure values and outlet velocities are relatively high, and therefore, under certaincircumstances, Eq. (2) may be sufficient for spray angle calculations.
3.4. Experimental verification of spray angle curvature
As discussed above, the profile of typical spray angles will be difficult to detect under
high pressure conditions and for small sized vessels. The experimental investigation on
industrial hydrocyclones in Leeudoorn (South Africa) Gold Mine offers such an oppor-
tunity. The milled product is pumped through the primary cyclone where the coarse
underflow is recycled to the mill. The overflow stream is fed to a secondary cyclone, the
underflow of which is fed back to the primary sump, where it is mixed with the effluent ofa SAG mill before being recycled to the primary cyclone. The overflow of the secondary
cyclone is withdrawn from the circuit. In this investigation, the camera was placed
approximately 50 cm from the underflow outlet of the secondary cyclone in order to assess
the robustness of the equipment, as well as to monitor the underflow of the cyclone.
Variation was induced in the system by changing the dilution of the pulp in the sumps
feeding the hydrocyclone. This affected the feed distribution, inlet pressure and flow rate,
as reflected in the spray angle of the secondary cyclone portrayed in Fig. 11. A typical
example of this industrial data is shown in Fig. 6 where a small upward curvature is
visible. In order to verify this effect, the data inFig. 11(spray angle change over time) will
be investigated. The important features in this data are (1) dilution change beginning att= 157 min and ending att= 184 min, (2) primary sump: 200 160 m3/h and (3) secondary
sump: 300250 m3/h.
Fig. 10. Comparison of spray angle models for an axial velocity of 2 m/s and tangential velocities from 0.5 to
10 m/s. Eq. (2) is calculated without a knowledge of the outlet radius. The curve for Eq. (25) shows that the
outlet radius, gravity effects and other geometrical properties can have a significant effect on calculated spray
angles.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 195
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
14/21
For each image of the hydrocyclone underflow, five sets ofx- andz-coordinates from the
image matrix were measured along the spray profile (z-coordinates were chosen approx-
imately 20 pixels apart), from which a set of four gradients were calculated, as given by
Spray profile section gradient
xi1xizi1zi
26
where i = 1, 2, 3 and 4. The underflow images are classified according to pre-dilution, during
dilution and post-dilution phases. For each phase of operation, average values of each of the
four measured gradients are calculated. Fig. 12 shows the averaged data with the
Fig. 11. Variation in spray angle of the underflow of the secondary cyclone in response to a dilution change
beginning att= 157 min and ending att= 184 min (200 160 m3/h for the primary sump and 300250 m3/h for
the secondary sump).
Fig. 12. Calculation of spray angle gradient along four sections of the underflow. Data are grouped into pre-
dilution, during dilution and after dilution stages. Average spray angle gradients of each stage are shown. Errors
for pre- and post-dilution are included.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203196
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
15/21
corresponding error bars for pre- and post-dilution. Qualitatively, Fig. 12shows that the pre-
dilution phase is well separated from the other two phases of operation. To confirm this
observation, a series oft-tests were performed.
In identifying differences between the three phases of the data, the t-test results indicatethat there is a definite difference in the underflow angle gradients for data taken during the
pre-dilution stage and for data during the dilution (a certainty typically greater than
95.5%). Similarly, a difference exists between pre- and post-dilution phases where the
certainty increases slightly to greater than 97.5%. In contrast, dilution and post-dilution
phases produce a nullresult. It can be concluded that there has been a real change in the
spray angle(Fig. 11)and that the gradient observed along the spray profile also changes
upon dilution.
4. Prediction of outlet velocities
4.1. Theoretical modelling
This section is to predict hydrocyclone flow rate conditions from image spray angle
data. Firstly, the model equations (Eqs. (23) and (24)) must be modified such that they are
amenable for comparison to image measurements. The unknowns in these two equations
areb and the exit velocities,vand w. The parameterb can be removed from the equations
by rearranging Eq. (23), giving
bcos1 rxr
27
which can then be substituted into Eq. (24). Consequently, if the outlet radius, rand the
exit velocities are known, and the measurements ofx-coordinate of the spray profile are
taken, then it is possible to predict the z-coordinate values. However, since the exit
velocities are unknown, it is more appropriate to take z- and x-coordinate measurements
from videographic images and then back-calculate the exit velocities. Coordinates of the
spray profile are extracted for the spray angle measurements(Petersen, 1998).
Eq. (24) is linear in form and can be represented by a simple addition of linear terms as
z= m1x1 + m2x2 + c where
m1w=v x1rtanb
m21=v2 x20:5agr2tan2b
c0 28
Now, given thatx, zand rare known through experiment, multi-linear regression can beused to find values form1 and m2, which effectively solves for the tangential and axial
velocities.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 197
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
16/21
In order to verify the model, a laboratory-scale hydrocyclone was used to demonstrate the
flow properties by analysing spray angles under different feed loading conditions. The
dimensions of the hydrocyclones used were inlet dimensions 8 13 mm, underflowdiameter 9 mm, overflow diameter 12 mm, and cyclone diameter 36 mm. For a range of
inlet pressures, spray angles were measured for a series of feed pulp concentrations (1%, 2%,
4%, 7%, 10%, 15%, 17%, 19%, 20%, 22% and 24% by mass; 600lm).Fig. 13showsspray angle measurements for inlet pressures of 40, 50 and 60 kPa, respectively. Fig. 14
Fig. 13. Spray angle measurements for a range of feed concentrations at varied inlet pressures. Trends indicate
that the higher pressure leads to a lower spray angle at higher feed concentrations.
Fig. 14. Three discharge profiles, data and predictions. For water-only conditions, pressures of 40, 50 and 60 kPa
were used, yielding calculated axial velocities of 10, 14 and 20 m/s, respectively. Image resolution is an important
aspect of detecting small, but crucial profile variations. Solid linesmodel.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203198
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
17/21
shows three examples of fitting the model to the laboratory data from Fig. 13(40, 50 and 60
kPa for water only). Each spray profile has been separated along the x-axis by 5 pixels for
demonstration purposes. The differences between each profile are not easily discernible by
visual inspection, indicating the highly sensitive diagnostic nature of the spray angle. It alsosuggests that high resolution data acquisition is paramount. Also shown by the thick lines are
the calculated profiles where axial and tangential velocities were found through the multi-
linear regression fitting procedure, from which z-coordinates were calculated using the x-
coordinate data. The corresponding tangential and axial velocities are given, demonstrating
that with an increase in the pressure (for water only), the exit velocities also increase. It is
Fig. 15. Calculated velocities from laboratory-scale image data. Differences with respect to pressure are evident.
Crossover point at approximately 7% concentration due to higher pressures eventually leading to increased
recovery. (a) Axial; (b) tangential.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 199
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
18/21
also interesting to note that the axial velocity is consistently higher than that of the tangential
velocity. This is due to the design of the cyclone cone section, which in this case is relatively
long and has an acute angle (approximately 15j). Although not shown here, the industrial-
scale results are reversed, where the tangential velocity is consistently higher than the axialvelocity, a system with a much less acute conical section.
Upon applying the exit velocity calculation procedure to the complete set of laboratory
spray profile images, Fig. 15 shows the resulting axial and tangential velocities. The
most interesting feature is that all three sets of data, for both tangential and axial
velocity, decrease noticeably from a concentration of approximately 2% onwards,
indicating that the underflow is sensitive to changes in concentration, i.e. viscosity
changes. In contrast, the corresponding underflow flow rate data are relatively constant
(slight progressive increase) until approximately 10%. It is only by expecting that the air
core radius decreases, could this happen, which further suggests a very sensitive
viscosity dependence.
The other important feature inFig. 15is that similar to the spray angle data, there is a
cross-over point at a concentration of 7%. This indicates a two-flow regime where under
dilute conditions, high inlet pressure results in a high transferral of momentum to the
underflow, whereas under high loading conditions, high pressure leads to greater material
recovery at the underflow.
Revisiting Fig. 13, it is evident in all three examples that the model slightly under-
predicts the data very close to where the spray initially exists the outlet such that the
upward curvature is overemphasised.Fig. 16shows a plot of the z-coordinate data versus
the calculatedz-coordinates, where the thick parity line highlights the slight departure ofthe model close to the outlet. The R2 correlation for the entire data set is 0.93, whereas if
only the coordinates greater than 30 (pixels) from the outlet are considered, then the R2drops to 0.82. The reason for this could be twofold: (a) The laboratory cyclone exhibits a
Fig. 16. Calculated z-coordinates versus measured z-coordinates for the data shown in Fig. 11.The correlation
between the data sets is high, but there is an evident discrepancy atz-coordinates close to the outlet.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203200
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
19/21
very small spray profile curvature due to the presence of high exit velocities in a relatively
small sized outlet. Consequently, it is essential that high resolution spray profile coordinate
extraction is performed, a factor which is largely the result of image capture quality. (b)
The spray profile model is developed on the assumption that the material projected fromthe underflow outlet is massless, and without a sheet thickness. A rigorous development of
force balances may be required, especially the centrifugal force, which could be re-
sponsible for a radical velocity component.
In comparison to the laboratory cyclone, the industrial cyclone discussed above displays
a relatively extended spray profile curvature. Applying the same correlation analysis to the
pre-dilution data, theR2 correlations for all the data and the data close to the outlet (> 40pixels) are 0.93 and 0.78, respectively. The correlations are consistent with those for the
laboratory data, suggesting that an account of fluid flow forces would provide the necessary
further refinement to the geometry considerations. In spite of the small discrepancies for the
laboratory system, the high correlations show that the spray profile model provides a more
than adequate description of the underflow structure for inferral purposes.
5. Summary and conclusions
The most significant conclusions for this investigation on hydrocyclone discharge spray
angles and the development of a soft-sensor are as follows.
The assumption that the exiting tangential fluid from an orifice is directed tangentiallyfrom the plane of the outlet has been used to formulate a spray angle model. The spray angle model accurately simulates the typical profile features of rotating fluid
through an outlet. In particular, the model predicts that the discharge spray profile
curves upwards after it immediately exits the outlet, indicating that the spray angle is
continually increasing. This result is supported by videographic evidence from an
industrial hydrocyclone. Gravity modifies the spray profile by causing a downward turn. The point along the
spray profile at which the gradient goes through a minimum is the effective spray angle.
The resulting gravity model is able to predict the two-dimensional coordinates of the
spray surface and the corresponding angle. However, the exit axial and tangentialvelocities must be known. These can be determined by matching the model to profile
coordinates extracted from image data. The exit velocities can subsequently be used to calculate the underflow flow rate
conditions. However, this can only be implemented by knowing the air core ratio,
which is found by back-calculating from the experimental spray angle and flow rate
data. The air core calculations are fitted with an empirical equation. The result forms
part of a soft-sensor based on spray angle and feed pressure acquisition.
Nomenclature
a air core radiusag acceleration of gravity
d vector parallel withy1-axis extending from circumference
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 201
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
20/21
d particle size
k1, k2, k3 constants
K constants
n tangential fluid flow vectorq +p perpendicular distance from outlet radius to tangential fluid stream in the outlet
plane
qu underflow flow rate
r classification sharpness
R underflow outlet radius
s vector which closesq and d into a triangle
u radial exit velocity [m/s]
v tangential exit velocity [m/s]
w axial exit velocity [m/s]
x the vector (q +p) with surface tension effects
y1, y2 axes of outlet plane
z z-coordinate
Greek letters
a classification sharpness
b angle measured at outlet radius
/ rescaled concentration
c complement to u
g total efficiencygu(X) fractional efficiency to underflow
u tangential velocity angle measured from horizontal
h observed discharge profile spray angle
h* reference angle to discharge profile from vertical
x angle from tangential direction caused by radial flow action
X complement to h*
References
Del Villar, R.G., Thibault, J., Del Villar, R., 1996. Development of a softsensor for particle size monitoring.
Minerals Engineering 9 (1), 5572.
Dombrowski, N., Hasson, D., 1969. The flow characteristics of swirl (centrifugal) spray pressure nozzles with
low viscosity liquids. AIChE Journal 15 (4), 604611.
Dumouchel, C., Bloor, M.I.G., Dombrowski, N., Ingham, D.B., Ledoux, M., 1993. Viscous flow in a swirl
atomiser. Chemical Engineering Science 48 (1), 8187.
Petersen, K.R.P., 1993. Vortex chamber air-core prediction for the simulation of hydrocyclone operation. MSc
thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.
Petersen, K.R.P., 1998. The monitoring of hydrocyclone underflows and mill feed systems using image process-
ing techniques. PhD thesis, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Taylor, G.I., 1948. The mechanics of swirl atomisers. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Applied
Mechanics, vol. 2, pp. 280285.
Van Latum, L., 1992. Computed tomographic imaging of a dense media cyclone. Applied Research in the
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203202
-
8/13/2019 Modelo Performance Hidrociclon Basado en Analisis Descarga
21/21
Minerals Industry (JKMRC Postgraduate Students Conference). JKMRC, The University of Queensland,
Queensland, Australia, pp. 6573.
Viljoen, T., 1993. Recent developments in instrumentation. SAIMM School: Process Simulation, Control and
Optimisation, The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Randburg, 1820 August.
Williams, R.A., 1995. Measurement and modelling of slurry mixing using resistance tomography. Proceed-
ings of the XIX International Mineral Processing Congress, Comminution and Simulation and Control,
San Francisco, USA. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. (AIME), Littleton, Co., USA,
pp. 251 256.
Williams, R.A., Dickin, F.J., Gutierrez, J.A., Dyakowski, T., Beck, M.S., 1995. Using electrical impedance
tomography for controlling hydrocyclone underflow discharge. Proceedings of the 8th IFAC International
Symposium on Automation in Mining, Mineral and Metal Processing, Sun City, South Africa. Pergamon
Press Inc., NY, USA, pp. 239242.
J.S.J. van Deventer et al. / Int. J. Miner. Process. 70 (2003) 183203 203