Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

49
© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. Method Development Creating the Perfect Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Transcript of Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

Page 1: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Method Development

Creating the Perfect Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Page 2: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Method Development

Goal: Reproducible method that tracks product performanceChoose measurement approach (dry vs. suspension)Lock down RIVary measurement settings that can influence result

Dry: measurement duration, concentration, air pressureWet: sampler selection, dispersion, duration, concentration, energy (mixing + ultrasound)

Test method (reproducibility)Meet ISO, USP or internal guidelinesCheck COV at d10, d50, d90

Page 3: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

GoalsReproducible method that tracks product performanceYou might have other goals

Accuracy: tricky subject, is it the “real” particle sizeRepeatability: liquid suspension re-circulating in samplerReproducibility: prepare, measure, empty, repeatResolution: optimize to find second populationsMatch historic data (sieves), but quicker, easier technique

Use structured approach for any decision/choice that may influence resultHave data to support selections madeDocument process so others (in future) understand the decisions

Page 4: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Accuracy vs. Precision

(A) Low accuracy, low precision measurements form a diffuse, off-center cluster; (B) Low accuracy, high precision measurements form a tight off-center cluster; (C) High accuracy, low precision measurements form a cluster that is evenly distributed but distant from the center of the target; (D) High Accuracy, high precision measurements are clustered in the center of the target.

LOW ACCURACYLOW PRECISION LOW ACCURACY

HIGH PRECISION HIGH ACCURACYLOW PRECISION HIGH ACCURACY

HIGH PRECISION

Page 5: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Accuracy

Is it the “real particle size”?Comparison to referee techniqueMicroscope (image analysis) is referee technique for particle characterizationTwo kinds of image analysis:

Dynamic image analysis; particles flowingStatic image analysis; particles sit on slide on automated stage

Page 6: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Image Analysis: Two Approaches

Dynamic:particles flow past camera

Static:particles fixed on slide,stage moves slide

Page 7: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Proposed Pharmaceutical Guidelines

Scheme for outlining particle evaluation for preclinical studies.

Decision tree outlining particle evaluation for Phase I clinical studies

Page 8: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Proposed Pharmaceutical Guidelines

Scheme for outlining particle evaluation for Phase III clinical studies

Page 9: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Repeatability, Reproducibility

Repeatability: prepare sample, add to wet sampler, re-circulate, measure same multiple times (suspensions only)Reproducibility: prepare sample, measure, drain, repeat (suspensions + dry)

Page 10: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Precision (Repeatability)

24 Samplings of Polystyrene Latex

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0.114 0.1

50.1

970.2

580.3

390.4

450.5

830.7

651.0

041.3

181.7

292.2

682.9

763.9

045.1

226.7

198.8

15

Size (microns)

Freq

uenc

y %

Page 11: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproducibility

Reproducibility: prepare, measure, empty, repeatWhat would be good reproducibility?

Look at accepted standardsMeasure 3 times, calculated COV at d10, d50, d90

– COV (RSD) = st dev/mean * 100

ISO13320– COV < 3% at median d50

– COV < 5% at d10 & d 90

USP<429>– COV < 10% at median d 50

– COV < 15% at d10 & d 90

Note: double all limitsWhen d50 < 10 μm

Page 12: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Resolution

Ability to measure small differences in particle sizeSmall differences between successive samples (different production lots) are most importantDetection limit of small amount of material outside of main size distributionBest defined by user’s real-world requirements

Page 13: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Resolution: High or Low Technique?

Resolve size difference between two materials of similar size552nm and 600nm PSLMeasured separately: high resolutionMeasure together: low resolution, would blend peaksLaser diffraction is a “resolution limited”technique

Page 14: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Resolution Limits

Resolution of multiple modes in a single sample

Next peak 2x of previous size

83nm, 204nm, 503nm PSL

Page 15: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Resolution Limits

Next peak 2x of previous size

Resolution is independent of where you are on size scale

100µm, 200µm, 400µm glass beads

Page 16: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Resolution: Finding Second Peak

0.1 micron silica material2% by weight of ~1 micron quartz standard addedOriginal slide showed .25%

Page 17: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Resolution: Recent LA-950 Data*

Median Size : 0.031 μm

Median Size : 1.65 μm

Median (Peak 1) : 0.031 μmMedian (Peak 2) : 1.75 μm

Top left: LUDOXTM-50 PSD,Lower left: 0.1wt% Geltech 1.5 PSDTop right: 0.05wt% Geltech 1.5 in LUDOX Result shows both oversize particle detection & very good accuracy for both components.

*See AN179 CMP SLURRY MEASUREMENT USING LASER DIFFRACTION

0.05wt%

Page 18: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Method Development: Dry

First get sampling right & determine RIMeasure at 3 different pressures (low, medium, high)Determine optimum pressure based on good dispersion while not breaking particlesCan also compare dry vs. wet measurementsAdjust other settings to optimize sample concentration & durationIdeally measure all of powder placed into the sampler

Segregation can occur on vibrating trayConstant mass flow rate important for stable concentration during measurement

Once settings chosen, test reproducibility

Page 19: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Size vs. Energy - theoretical vs. actualS

ize

Increasing energy

Stability

Theoretical Actual

Siz

e

Increasing energy

Higher air pressure or longer ultrasound duration

Page 20: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Why is this so?Dispersion and milling can be parallel rather than sequential processes

Theoretical

Actual

Page 21: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Pressure Titration

1 bar

2 bar

3 bar

Page 22: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Dry Method DevelopmentCase Studies

Magnesium StearateMicrocrystalline Cellulose

Page 23: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effect of Air Pressure – Mg Stearate

High = 3 barMid = 2 barLow = 1 bar

Page 24: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effect of Air Pressure – Mg Stearate

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

D90D50D10

D90 15.258 14.394 12.822

D50 8.626 8.149 7.502

D10 4.862 4.564 4.234

1 2 3

Page 25: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproducibility – Mg Stearate dry, 3 bar

Page 26: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproducibility – Mg Stearate dry, 2 bar

Page 27: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproducibility – Mg Stearate dry, 1 bar

Page 28: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effect of Air Pressure - MCC

Page 29: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effect of Air Pressure - MCC

0

50

100

150

200

D90D50D10

D90 161.158 160.713 144.259

D50 65.938 64.599 58.578

D10 25.76 24.308 22.655

1 2 3

Page 30: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproducibility – MCC dry, 3 bar

Page 31: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Calculation Automation

From LA-950 Software

Page 32: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

MCC Wet vs. Dry

Page 33: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Method Development -Wet

First determine RI Choose solvent (water, surfactants, hexane, etc.)Sampler selection: sample volumePump & stirrer settingsConcentrationMeasurement durationDoes the sample need ultrasound?

Document size-time plotDisperse sample, but don’t break particlesCheck for reproducibility

Page 34: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Determine RI

Real component via literature or web search, Becke line, etc.Measure sample, vary imaginary component to see if/how results changeRecalculate using different imaginary components, choose value that minimizes R parameter error calculation

Page 35: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

RI Software Automation

Page 36: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Sampler SelectionLarger, broad distributions require larger sample volumeLower volume samplers for precious materials or solvents

10Small Volume Fraction Cell

15Fraction Cell

35 - 50MiniFlow

180 - 330Aqua/SolvoFlow

Dispersing Volume (mL)LA-950 Sample Handlers

Median (D50):35 nm

Sample Amount:132 mg

Median (D50):114 µm

Sample Amount:1.29 mg

Median (D50):9.33 µm

Sample Amount:0.165 mg

Note: Fraction cell has only magnetic stir bar, not for large or heavy particles

Bio polymer Colloidal silica Magnesium stearate

Page 37: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Pump & Stirrer SettingsMust be high enough to suspend & circulate heavy particlesNot so high that bubbles are introducedAdding energy – can disperse loose agglomeratesMeasure at several settings & select optimumCan be automated in software (see right)

Exp # Agitation Circulation Dmean (nm) D10 (nm) D90 (nm)

1 1 1 187.03 137.5 245.7

2 1 3 184.23 135.9 242.1

3 3 1 187.28 137.8 245.8

4 3 3 184.61 136.1 242.5

5 1 1 185.32 136.3 243.7

6 1 3 184.04 135.8 241.8

7 3 1 184.13 135.8 241.9

8 3 3 184.98 136.4 242.9

Parameters Selected: Agitation: 2 Circulation: 2

Page 38: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Concentration

High enough for good S/N ratioLow enough to avoid multiple scatteringTypically 95 – 80 %TMeasure at different T%, look at Chi Square calculation

d50

Chi2

Page 39: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Measurement Duration

Long enough for reproducibilityTypically 5 sec, up to several minutesLonger time for large, broad distributionsCan be automated in softwareCould be used for robustness testing during method validation

Page 40: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Ultrasound

Adding energy to break up agglomerates – disperse to primary particles, without breaking particlesSimilar to changing air pressure on dry powder feederTypically set to 100% energy, vary time (sec) onInvestigate tails of distribution

High end to see if agglomerates removedSmall end to see if new, smaller particles appear (breakage)

Test reproducibility, consider robustnessNote:

Do not use on emulsionsCan cause thermal mixing trouble w/solvents - waitUse external probe if t> 2-5 minutes

Page 41: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Software Automation

Level (power)Time onIterationsDelayGenerate result graphs

Page 42: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Wet Method DevelopmentCase Study

Microcrystalline Cellulose

Page 43: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effect of Ultrasound - MCC

Page 44: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effect of Ultrasound - MCC

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

0 sec

5 sec

10 sec15 sec

20 sec40 sec

60 sec

Siz

e (μ

m)

Ultrasound (sec)

D90D50D10

Page 45: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproducibility – MCC wetISO13320

– COV < 3% at median d50

– COV < 5% at d10 & d 90

USP<429>– COV < 10% at median d 50

– COV < 15% at d10 & d 90

Page 46: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproducibility*58 methodsImage analysis for morphologyLaser diffraction for PSDIf RSD for d50 < 20%, then acceptable for QC environmentNote: RSD increases with decreasing size

*Barber, Keuter, and Kravig, A Logical Stepwise Approach to Laser Diffraction Particle Size Distribution Analysis Methods Development and Validation Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 3(2), 153-161 (1998)

Acceptable

Not acceptable per USP<429>

Page 47: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Sampler Selection

*Barber, Keuter, and Kravig, A Logical Stepwise Approach to Laser Diffraction Particle Size Distribution Analysis Methods Development and Validation Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 3(2), 153-161 (1998)

Acceptable

Not acceptable

Remove points from not acceptable region using Fraction Cell

Page 48: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Conclusions

Must have representative samplePowders: select air pressureSuspensions: wet, disperseCheck accuracy w/microscopeInvestigate system settings: concentration, agitation, ultrasoundDesign for maximum precisionFollow guidelines in standards

Page 49: Method Development Aug 19 2009 - Horiba

© 2007 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

www.horibalab.com