mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics...

19
Correlation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis in Lung and Gastrointestinal Cancers. Toor M, et al.

Transcript of mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics...

Page 1: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

Correlation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis in Lung and Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Toor M, et al.

Page 2: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Table 1. Common genes between Caris, Paradigm and Guardant360 platforms

Paradigm vs Guardant360 Caris vs Guardant360

1. AKT1 1. AKT1A

2. ALK 2. ALK3. BRAF 3. APC4. BRCA1 4. AR5. BRCA2 5. ARAF6. CCND1 6. ARD1A7. CCND2 7. ATM8. CCNE1 8. BRAF9. CDK4 9. BRCA110. CDK6 10. BRCA211. EGFR 11. CCND112. EGFR 12. CCND213. ERBB2 13. CCNE114. ERBB2 14. CDH115. ESR1 15. CDK416. FGFR1 16. CDK617. FGFR2 17. CDKN2A18. FGFR2 18. CTNNB119. FGFR3 19. DDR220. GATA3 20. EGFR21. GNAQ 21. ERBB222. GNAS 22. ESR123. HRAS 23. EZH224. IDH1 24. FBXW725. IDH2 25. FGFR126. KIT 26. FGFR227. KRAS 27. FGFR328. MAP2K1 28. GATA329. MAP2K2 29. GNA1130. MET 30. GNAQ31. MET 31. GNAS32. MTOR 32. HNF1A33. MYC 33. HRAS34. NRAS 34. IDH135. PDGFRA 35. IDH236. PIK3CA 36. JAK237. RET 37. JAK338. ROS1 38. KIT39. SMO 39. KRAS40. TP53 40. MAP2K141. TSC1 41. MAP2K2

42. MET43. MLH144. MPL45. MTOR46. MYC47. NF1

Page 3: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

48. NFE2L249. NOTCH150. NPM151. NRAS52. NTRK153. NTRK354. PDGFRA55. PIK3CA56. PTEN57. PTPN1158. RAF159. RB160. RET61. ROS162. SMAD463. SMO64. STK1165. TERT66. TP5367. TSC168. VHL

Page 4: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

Supplementary Table 2

Supplementary Table 2: Common mutations between Guardant 360 and Caris/Paradigm platforms

Pt

#

Age

(years)

Gender(M/F)

Diagnosis Common mutations

(n =8)

4 78 M Adenocarcinoma of

Lung

EGFR (G719A)

EGFR (S768I)

10 45 M Colorectal

Adenocarcinoma

KRAS (G12D)

TP53 (R248W)

15 67 F Adenocarcinoma of

Lung

EGFR (Exon 19 Insertion)

18 74 M Gastroesophageal

Junction Carcinoma

ERBB2 (Amplification)

24 63 M Intrahepatic

Cholangiocarcinoma

IDH1 (R132C)

27 62 F Colorectal

Adenocarcinoma

KRAS (Q61H)

Page 5: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

Supplementary Table 3

Supplementary Table 3: Actionable mutations detected both in tissue and blood and FDA approved drugs for these mutations

Pt #

Age

(years)

Gender(M/F)

Diagnosis Number of

metastatic

lesions

Targetable

mutations in tissue

(n=9)

Drugs (FDA

approved and drugs

under clinical trials)

Reference(s)

Targetable

mutations in blood(n=14)

Drugs (FDA

approved and under

clinical trials)

Reference(s)

2 78 F Adenocarcinoma Lung

2 EML4/ALK

Alectinib*Ceritinib*Crizotinib*Brigatinib*

(1)(2)(3)(4)

4 78 M Adenocarcinoma Lung

>3 EGFR (G719A)

EGFR (S768I)

Afatinib*Erlotinib*Gefitinib*

AP32788***

Afatinib*Erlotinib*Gefitinib*

AP32788***

(5)(6)(6)(5)(7)(8)

EGFR (G719A)

EGFR (S768I)

Afatinib*Erlotinib*Gefitinib*

AP32788***

Afatinib*Erlotinib*Gefitinib*

AP32788***

(5)(6)(6)(5)(7)(8)

6 66 M Pancreatic Ductal

Adenocarcinoma

>3 CDKN2A (L78fs)

Palbociclib**

Palbociclib** +

Letrozole**

(9,10) ATM (R3008C)

Olaparib** (11)

11 67 M Small Cell Lung

Carcinoma

>3 NF1 (R816*)

Trametinib**

Binimetinib***

PLX3397***

(12–14)

12 70 F Adenocarcinoma Lung

2 FGFR1 (Amplifica

tion)

AZD4547***

Debio1347***

15 67 F Adenocarcinoma Lung

>3 EGFR (Exon 19 Insertion)

Afatinib*Erlotinib*Gefitinib*

AP32788***

(15)(15)(15)

EGFR (Exon 19 Insertion)

CDK4

Afatinib*Erlotinib*Gefitinib*

AP32788***

(15)(15)(15)

(16)

Page 6: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

(Amplifica

tion)

BRCA2

(R2842H)

Palbociclib**

Abemaciclib***

Rucaparib**Niraparib**Olaparib**

(17)

(18)(19)

17 82 F Adenocarcinoma Lung

3 EGFR

(L858R)

PIK3CA (e542k)

Afatinib*Erlotinib*Gefitinib*

Taselisib**

AZD5363*** GDC-0077***

(20)(21,22)

(23)

(24)

KIT (T670I)

Sorafenib (25)

18 74 M Gastroesophageal Junction

Carcinoma

2 ERBB2 (Amplifica

tion)

Trastuzumab*

Lapatinib**+ Trastuzumab*

Pertuzumab** +

Trastuzumab*

Ado-trastuzuma

b emtansine*

*

Lapatinib**

Neratinib**

Afatinib**

(26)

(27,28)

(26)

(29)

(26)

(30)

(27,28)

(31)

(32)

ERBB2 (Amplifica

tion)

ERBB2(D769Y)

Trastuzumab*

Lapatinib**+

Trastuzumab*

Pertuzumab** +

Trastuzumab*

Ado-trastuzuma

b emtansine*

*

Lapatinib**

Neratinib**

Afatinib**

Neratinib*

(26)

(27,28)

(26)

(29)

(26)

(30)

(27,28)

(31)

(32)

(33)

Page 7: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

MET (Amplifica

tion)

Crizotinib**

Cabozantinib**

(34,35)

(36)

24 63 M Intrahepatic

Cholangiocarcinoma

> 3 IDH1 (R132C)

AG-120***BAY14360

32***CB-839***

BRAF (D594N)

IDH1 (R132C)

Sorafenib

AG-120***BAY14360

32***CB-839***

(37)

* FDA approved drugs** FDA approved drugs for malignancies other than GI and lung*** Drugs under clinical trials, www.clinicaltrials.gov

Page 8: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

Supplementary Figure 1

Supplementary Figure 1a.

Supplementary Figure 1b.

Page 9: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

Supplementary Figure 1c

Supplementary Figure 1d

Page 10: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

Figure legends:

Supplementary figure 1a shows case 1 with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma to

the liver treated with mFOLFIRINOX. ctDNA analysis shows that on day 77 of treatment

both KRAS (G12D) and TP53 (A159D) mutations become undetectable. In parallel,

CT scans show a significant decrease in the liver lesions. On day 196 ctDNA NGS

demonstrates emergence of new TP53 splice site mutations, although the clinical

relevance of these alterations is not clear.

Supplementary figure 1b shows a patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma to

the liver. Day 0 represents the initiation of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel

chemotherapy. On day 63 persistence of KRAS (G12V), APC (K1310fs) and GNAS

(R201H) mutations was noted on ctDNA analysis but a mutation within SMAD4

(H132P), which is a bad prognostic marker, also emerged at this time point.

Interestingly, the patient was deteriorating clinically, and imaging showed worsening of

disease.

Supplementary figure 1c represents a patient with cholangiocarcinoma who developed

recurrent disease on imaging studies before the onset of clinical symptoms. Originally,

the patient had undergone surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiation.

On day 634 post resection the patient was doing well clinically, and imaging reported no

recurrence. However, on day 753 ctDNA analysis showed mutations within KRAS

(A146T), SMAD4 (S357P), FGFR3 (S408F), and APC (S2028R) as shown above;

Page 11: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

although the patient was asymptomatic, PET scan showed recurrence of the tumor

within the liver which was also confirmed by biopsy.

Supplementary figure 1d shows the clonal evolution of an EGFR exon 19 deletion

positive lung adenocarcinoma. The patient benefited from treatment with afatinib until

day 367 when progression was demonstrated on imaging studies. ctDNA analysis

identified both exon 19 deletion and T790M mutation in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain

of the EGFR gene on day 375. The patient started on treatment with osimertinib on day

431 which resulted in an excellent response. ctDNA analysis on day 825 detected MET

and CCNE1 gene amplifications. There was a clonal expansion of the EGFR TK exon

19 deletion, TP53 R248W, and PDGFRA E459* mutations; also, a new RB1 K122*

clone was detected, indicating possible disease progression. Disease progression was

confirmed by CT scans on day 885. The patient started treatment with a combination of

osimertinib and crizotinib on day 910. Treatment benefit lasted for approximately 6

months until confirmed radiologic progression occurred on day 1071.

Page 12: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

References:

1. Ou S-HI, Ahn JS, De Petris L, Govindan R, Yang JC-H, Hughes B, et al. Alectinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK- Rearranged Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Global Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:661–8.

2. Shaw AT, Kim D-W, Mehra R, Tan DSW, Felip E, Chow LQM, et al. Ceritinib in ALK -Rearranged Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1189–97.

3. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim D-W, Wu Y-L, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, et al. First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in ALK -Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2167–77.

4. Kim D-W, Tiseo M, Ahn M-J, Reckamp KL, Hansen KH, Kim S-W, et al. Brigatinib in Patients With Crizotinib-Refractory Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2490–8.

5. Yang JCH, Sequist L V., Geater SL, Tsai CM, Mok TSK, Schuler M, et al. Clinical activity of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations: A combined post-hoc analysis of LUX-Lung 2, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6. Lancet Oncol. Elsevier Ltd; 2015;16:830–8.

6. Wu J-Y, Yu C-J, Chang Y-C, Yang C-H, Shih J-Y, Yang P-C. Effectiveness of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on “Uncommon” Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations of Unknown Clinical Significance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:3812–21.

7. Hellmann MD, Reva B, Yu H, Rusch VW, Rizvi NA, Kris MG, et al. Clinical and in vivo Evidence that EGFR S768I Mutant Lung Adenocarcinomas Are Sensitive to Erlotinib. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:e73–e74.

8. Masago K, Fujita S, Irisa K, Kim Y, Ichikawa M, Mio T, et al. Good clinical response to gefitinib in a non-small cell lung cancer patient harboring a rare somatic epidermal growth factor gene point mutation; codon 768 AGC > ATC in exon 20 (S768I). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:1105–9.

9. Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, Jones S, Im S-A, Gelmon K, et al. Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1925–36.

10. Huang S, Ye H, Guo W, Dong X, Wu N, Zhang X, et al. CDK4/6 inhibitor suppresses gastric cancer with CDKN2A mutation. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:11692–700.

11. Mateo J, Carreira S, Sandhu S, Miranda S, Mossop H, Perez-Lopez R, et al. DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1697–708.

12. Nissan MH, Pratilas CA, Jones AM, Ramirez R, Won H, Liu C, et al. Loss of NF1 in cutaneous melanoma is associated with RAS activation and MEK dependence

Page 13: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

Moriah. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2340–2350.

13. Ranzani M, Alifrangis C, Perna D, Dutton-Regester K, Pritchard A, Wong K, et al. BRAF/NRAS wild-type melanoma, NF1 status and sensitivity to trametinib. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2015;28:117–9.

14. Ameratunga M, McArthur G, Gan H, Cher L. Prolonged disease control with MEK inhibitor in neurofibromatosis type I-associated glioblastoma. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41:357–9.

15. He M, Capelletti M, Nafa K, Yun C, Kris MG, Eck MJ, et al. EGFR Exon 19 Insertions: A New Family of Sensitizing EGFR Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma Mai. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1790–7.

16. Dickson MA, Tap WD, Keohan ML, D’Angelo SP, Gounder MM, Antonescu CR, et al. Phase II trial of the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 in patients with advanced CDK4-amplified well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2024–8.

17. Swisher EM, Lin KK, Oza AM, Scott CL, Giordano H, Sun J, et al. Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. Elsevier Ltd; 2017;18:75–87.

18. Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J, Oza AM, Mahner S, Redondo A, et al. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2154–64.

19. Kaufman B, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, Audeh MW, Friedlander M, Balmaña J, et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:244–50.

20. Sequist L V., Yang JC-H, Yamamoto N, O’Byrne K, Hirsh V, Mok T, et al. Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3327–34.

21. Shepherd FA, Pereira JR, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, et al. Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:123–32.

22. Tsao MS, Sakurada A, Cutz JC, Zhu CQ, Kamel-Reid S, Squire J, et al. Erlotinib in lung cancer - molecular and clinical predictors of outcome. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:133–44.

23. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, et al. Gefitinib or Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2380–8.

24. Lopez S, Schwab CL, Cocco E, Bellone S, Bonazzoli E, English DP, et al. Taselisib, a selective inhibitor of PIK3CA, is highly effective on PIK3CA-mutated and HER2/neu amplified uterine serous carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135:312–7.

Page 14: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

25. Guo T, Agaram NP, Wong GC, Hom G, D’Adamo D, Maki RG, et al. Sorafenib inhibits the imatinib-resistant KITT670I gatekeeper mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4874–81.

26. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): A phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Elsevier Ltd; 2010;376:687–97.

27. Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, Chan S, Romieu CG, Pienkowski T, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2733–43.

28. Hicks M, Macrae ER, Abdel-Rasoul M, Layman R, Friedman S, Querry J, et al. Neoadjuvant dual HER2-targeted therapy with lapatinib and trastuzumab improves pathologic complete response in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized prospective clinical trials. Oncologist. 2015;20:337–43.

29. von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E, Zardavas D, Benyunes M, Viale G, et al. Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:122–31.

30. Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, et al. Trastuzumab Emtansine for HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1783–91.

31. Chan A, Delaloge S, Holmes FA, Moy B, Iwata H, Harvey VJ, et al. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;17:367–77.

32. Choudhury NJ, Campanile A, Antic T, Yap KL, Fitzpatrick CA, Wade JL, et al. Afatinib activity in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma in patients with ERBB alterations. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2165–71.

33. Bose R, Kavuri SM, Searleman AC, Shen W, Shen D, Daniel C. Activating HER2 mutations in HER2 gene amplification negative breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:224–37.

34. Ou S-HI, Kwak EL, Siwak-Tapp C, Dy J, Bergethon K, Clark JW, et al. Activity of Crizotinib (PF02341066), a Dual Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (MET) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitor, in a Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patient with De Novo MET Amplification. J Thorac Oncol. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer; 2011;6:942–6.

35. Lennerz JK, Kwak EL, Ackerman A, Michael M, Fox SB, Bergethon K, et al. MET amplification identifies a small and aggressive subgroup of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma with evidence of responsiveness to crizotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4803–10.

Page 15: mct.aacrjournals.org · Web viewCorrelation of Somatic Genomic Alterations Between Tissue Genomics and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Employing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Analysis

36. Garajová I, Giovannetti E, Biasco G, Peters GJ. c-Met as a target for personalized therapy. Transl Oncogenomics. 2015;2015:13–31.

37. Smalley KSM, Xiao M, Villanueva J, Nguyen TK, Keith T, Letrero R, et al. CRAF inhibition induces apoptosis in melanoma cells with non- V600E BRAF mutations. Oncogene. 2009;28:85–94.