Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in...

14
Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development 6-7 December 2011, Belgrade

Transcript of Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in...

Page 1: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo

Equity and quality in transitions in education:

Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development

6-7 December 2011, Belgrade

Page 2: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Outline

• Transitions in education– What is meant by them?– Why are they important?– How can they affect equity and quality?

• Some data about education transitions in Serbia

• Policy inputs

Page 3: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Transitions in education (1)

• Any shift from one level of education to another– Between different levels:

• e.g. from primary to secondary education

– Between different years• e.g. from first to second year of studies

• Transitions marked by two processes– Assessment– Selection

• Impact of transitions on equity and quality depends on the nature of assessment and consequences of selection (e.g. tracking)

Page 4: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Transitions in education (2)

• Assessment may seem neutral at the first glance so why should it affect equity?– From early age students from lower SEB score less on

various assessment tests (grades in school, entrance exams for secondary or higher education etc)

– Tests can be biased in various ways (e.g. in favour of majority mother tongue)

• Some animals are more equal than others– Although seems neutral and (completely) meritocratic in

essence disregards starting inequalities– Some groups experience multiple disadvantage

• Importance of economic, cultural and social capital

Page 5: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Transitions in education (3)

• Selection – in essence two processes:– “System” choosing the students– Parents and/or students choosing their education

• Increasing quality vs. decreasing equity?– “System” wants to pair students and schools in

the best way possible (e.g. “best and brightest in best schools”)

– Parents and/or students want to maximise their returns

Page 6: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Example: transition from SE to HE (1)

• Criteria: – grades from secondary education

– entrance exam scores• Purpose of entrance exams to create a level playing field?

• Possible sources of problems with equity:– grades correlated with SEB

• Disadvantage accumulated through previous stages of education

– special entrance exam preparation courses• Available to those with ability to pay and attend

Page 7: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Example: transition from SE to HE (2)

• Possible consequences for equity– Students with lower SEB can not access HE or

access less prestigious HE institutions or fields– Students with lower SEB can not get into the state

funded quota

Page 8: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Some data (1)

• Transition from PE to SE – combining PISA and TIMSS (see Babin, Pantic, Vukasovic 2009)

• Type of secondary school correlated with education of parents– 64.4% of students in 3 year SE has education of

parents at ISCED < 3; compared to 4.4% of students in 4 year academic SE (gimnazija)

– 51.9% of students in 4 year academic SE has education of parents at ISCED 5A or 5B; compared to 12.1% of students in 3 year SE

Page 9: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Some data (2)

• Grades in PE, SE entrance exams scores, as well as PISA test scores correlated with education of parents (Spearman’s rho)

VI grade VII grade

VIII grade

E. exam math

E. exam lang.

PISA math

PISA reading

Education of parents

0.21 0.20 0.19 0.23 0.17 0.22 0.22

Page 10: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Some data (3)

• Transition from SE to HE (see Vukasovic 2007)– Students with better educated parents tend to end

up in academic HEI– Students with better educated parents tend to end

up in the state funded quota

• Progress through HE (see Vukasovic 2007)– Those with better educated parents

overrepresented in higher years of higher education

Page 11: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Some data (4)

Page 12: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Some data (5)

• Estimated that 45% of students drop out (pre Bologna)

• Indications that some students do not complete the HE initially chosen – Average age at enrolment for total student

population approx. 1 year lower then average age at enrolment for graduates (in the programme they graduated from)

Page 13: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Data problems

• Incomplete data bases for different stages of education– Sometimes data categories no longer relevant

• Not possible to combine data even within one stage of education– E.g. SV20 (enrolment into HE) and SV50

(graduation from HE) do not match in terms data collected or in terms of time covered

• No automatic linkages between data bases

Page 14: Martina Vukasovic, research fellow, University of Oslo Equity and quality in transitions in education: Evidence (gaps) and some inputs for policy development.

Some policy inputs

• Sort out data!• Strengthen the cross-sectoral linkages in

terms of development of policy• Adequate attention to all policy instruments

(e.g. financing regulation and legislation often clash)