SOAP Quang Vinh Pham Simon De Baets Université Libre de Bruxelles1.
Management in complexity The exploration of a new paradigm Complexity theory and the Quantum...
-
Upload
charlotte-matthews -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Management in complexity The exploration of a new paradigm Complexity theory and the Quantum...
Management in complexity
The exploration of a new paradigm
Complexity theory and the Quantum Interpretation
Walter Baets, PhD, HDRAssociate Dean for Innovation and Social ResponsibilityProfessor Complexity , Knowledge and InnovationEuromed Marseille – Ecole de Management
A quantum interpretation
Gödel’s theorem: 1931No absolute axiomatic system is possible
Relativity theory (Einstein): first part of the 20st centuryNo absolute measurement is possible
Quantum mechanics: first part of the 20st centuryObservation is interpretation
Complexity theory (Prigogine): second part of 20st centuryEmergence, bifurcations, strange attractors
Once holism and complexity accepted we cannot avoid a fundamental question
PAULI complementary physics
Synchronicity (=occurring–together-in-time)
From causal coherence Coincidence(from cause to effect) (occurring together)
A-causal linkshence….
A quantum interpretation
non-locality; synchronicity; entanglement
Mechanistic versus organic: The evolution in business
Product oriented Unique distribution channelsControlStabilityManagement by objectiveProcesses are the assetsHierarchical organization Machine thinking (symbolic)Industrial era
The client co-createsMultiple channelsEmergent processesChange (learning) is the goalManagement in change and complexityLearning is the assetHuman networksHuman thinking (fuzzy)Knowledge era
Some quantum storiesMaxwell, Planck and Bohr: introduced criteria such as fertility,
beauty and coherenceEinstein, de Broglie and Schrödinger: shared a commitment to a
continuous wave as a basic physical entity subject to a
causal descriptionHeisenberg, Pauli, Jordan and Dirac: we no longer have
event-by-event causality and particles do not follow well-defined trajectories in a space-time background
In 1935, Schrödinger formulated his famous ‘cat paradox’Pauli: Background physics has an archetypal origin and that leads
to a natural science which will work just as well with matter
as with consciousness Pauli accepted that physical values, as much as
archetypes, change in the eyes of the observer. Observation is the result of human consciousness
Some quantum stories (2)
Polkinghorne: The implication of these observations is that the phenomenon of “entanglement” (non-locality) includes a real remote activity, not simply epistemological, but in fact ontological in nature
Polkinghorne (1990): The greater the experience of satisfaction, the more the consciousness of each cell in the body will resonate with the holographic information engraved in the "quantum zero point" (the lowest possible state of energy, in an almost resting, but not quite, situation) of the energy field
So, on the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, physical processes are, at the most fundamental level, both inherently indeterministic and non-local. The ontology of classical physics is dead. The heart of the problem is the entanglement (or non-separability) of quantum states that gives rise to the measurement problem. This entanglement makes it impossible to assign independent properties to an arbitrary isolated physical system once it has interacted with another system in the past – even though these two systems are no longer interacting. The non-separability characteristic of quantum systems can be seen as an indication of the ‘holistic’ character of such systems.
A quantum interpretation
In the arts: Cara et MurphyIn linguistics: Dalla Chiarra et GiuntiniIn the physical sciences: PauliIn biology: Sheldrake (morphogenetic fields and resonance)In medicine: Chopra, the Ayurveda, but also increasingly in
regular medicine
The Bogdanov Singularity
The «Wall of Planck» (physical limit) = 10-43
3 ‘space’ and 1 ‘time’ dimensionAre space and time so neatly divided ?
(Prigogine; the DVD)Synchronicity in quantumphysicsBogdanov’s (physics and mathematics):
“Avant le big bang”
The Bogdanov Singularity (2)
Beyond the « Wall of Planck » ?Before “the big bang” ?There is a fifth dimension, being
a fourth of space expressed in imaginary time
Time-space really becomes a continuumThat singularity has no classical
movement anymore (“what is”)
Entrainment(Institute of Heart Math; www.heartmath.org)
Physiology of emotionsHow emotions influence cognition,
behavior and healthThe heart is a highly complex system:
a sensory organ, a heart brain (nervous center)
That “heart brain” allows us to learn andtakes decisions independent from the brain’s cerebral cortex
Entrainment (2)
There is a strong interaction through thebody via an electromagnetic field
Rythms should naturally synchronize onthat heart rhythm
The same happens between people (pendulum clocks: Huygens)
Socio-emotional interaction between mother and child
Heart coherence
Research agendaIn search of « synchronicity »
• Can we visualize synchronicity in management• What are the organizing principles and what is precisely
emergence• Emergent concepts in management• « Complex Adaptive Systems » as research tools
Agents, Neural Networks, Learning systems• The contribution of this paradigm for knowledge, learning and
innovation in companies• Another understanding of innovation
Expected contributions
The areas of attention in businessin a quantum world
• Market behavior (the outside world)• Human interaction (the inside world)• Management learning (innovation, knowledge)
In a knowledge society,and that is the big shift that has taken place
A holistic management concept
MechanisticMechanisticmanagementmanagement
approachapproach
SystemicSystemicmanagement management
approachapproach
Beliefs, valuesBeliefs, values& culture& culture
(identity)(identity)
PersonalPersonalDevelopmentDevelopment
(Learner centered)(Learner centered)
•Quantitative approaches•Control/performance•Management by objectives•Models•Financial orientation•Short term efficiency•Production management
•Dynamic system behavior•Management in complexity•Management in diversity•Knowledge management•Community of practices•Ecological management•Ethics in management•Social corporate responsibility•Sustainable development•The networked economy•Emergence, innovation…
•Historic legitimacy•Diversity•Sociology•Humanism•Relativism•Complexity •Social responsibility•Long term perspective•Sustainable development
•Personal development•Emotional development•Leadership•Making a difference •Self motivation•Joy•Involvement•Responsibility•Respect
Individual
Collective/Networked
Interior Exterior
Values Holistic performanceAxis 1: Diversity Axis 7: Sustainable development andAxis 2: Complexity social responsibility Personal development Axis 8: Knowledge and learningAxis 3: Personal well beingAxis 4: Leadership and teamworkMechanistic performanceAxis 5: Financial performanceAxis 6: Innovative potential
Cassandra©: a holistic diagnostic for sustainableperformance
• Corporate version• Personal version
Floors of the « house » of knowing
Classical science Noetic science Ayurveda Nature and potential of consciousness Indian « science of life »
1. Mathematics 1. Fractal algebra 1. Matter form
2. Physics 2. Energy physics 2. Ether and astral body
(quantum mechanics)
3. Chemistry 3. Vibrational chemistry 3. Energy level
(quantum mechanics, quarks)
4. Biology 4. Noetic biology 4. Desire (cells as integrated communities control by the organisms perception)
5. Psychology 5. Energy psychology 5. Capacity to think
(perceptions – energy fields) (conceptualization)
6. Intuition,
intelligence
7. Consciousness