June 6,2011 President 7099 3400 0009 0514 3789 American ...Customer Experience Measurement Overall...
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of June 6,2011 President 7099 3400 0009 0514 3789 American ...Customer Experience Measurement Overall...
-
June 6,2011
Mr. Cliff GuffeyPresidentAmerican Postal Workers
Union (APWU), AFL-CIO1300 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-4128
Dear Cliff:
Certified Mail Tracking Number:7099 3400 0009 0514 3789
As information, enclosed is a copy of the second and final Post Implementation Review (PIR) forthe Queens, New York Processing and Distribution Center area mail processing study.
If you have any questions, please contact Jacqueline Adona at (202) 268-3800.
Sincerely,
Patrick M. DevineActing ManagerContract Administration (APWU)
Enclosure
(CA2011-478)
-
Dec-31-2010
November 28,2008
05-14-2011 21:44
Type of Distribution Consolidated: OrigInatIngFacility Name & Type: Queens P&DC
Street Address: 14202 20tfl AveCity: Queens
State: NY50 Faclltty ZIP Code: 11351
District: TIiboroArea: Nort1least
Finance Number: _Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 110,111,113,114
Miles to Gaining Facility: 12EXFC omce: Yes
Plant Manager: Gloria ReidSenior Plant Manager: Frank Calabrese
District Manager: LorraIne Castellano
Facility Name & Type: Brooklyn P&DCStreet Address: 1050 Forbell St
City: BrooklynState: NY
50 Facility ZIP Code: 11256District: Tliboro
Area: NortheastFinance Number: _
Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 112, 116EXFC omce: Yes
Plant Manager:Senior Plant Manager: Frank Calabrese
District Manager: LorraIne Castellano
Approval Date: july 22,2009Implementation Date: Jan-01-2010
PIR Type: Final PIRDate Range of Data: Jan-0'1-2010:
Processing Days per Year: 310Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,750
EAS Hours per Year: 1,825Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost or Borrowing!
New Facility Start-up Costs Update t------------iDate & Time this workbok was last saved:
Area Vice President: Stephen J. ForteVice President, Network Operations: David E. Williams Jr
Area AMP Coordinator: Stuart TegerNAI Contact: Bamara BreWIngton
PIR Data Entry PagePage 1 of 39
-
Approval Signatures
Queens P&OC1135.1__---------------- _
.IL,..:-11:.:::3,L:..11:.;;4_~ ~ _-::Q!19:-:.;..,·cc..in;::a""tinc;.ogZ-...-__ ._. _
Brooklyn P&OC11256 --_._-=_....__
Losing FacUlty Name and Type:Faclltty ZlP Code:Finance Number:
Current SCF ZlP Cocte(a):
Type of Olstrlbutlon COfl$Olldated:
Galn.ng FacUlty Name and Type:Fadllty ZIP Coa.:Finance Number:
Currcmt SCF ZIP C«fe{a}:
Implem~mtationDate:
Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2010
PIR Type: EJfl~lPIR ..to Dec-31-2010
U.·.&::.1W2 tUJIAaJtit $.
ACKNOWlEOOEMEHT OF ACCOUNTA81UTY 11lC~l'lOW!edg&!hat I am acco
-
Executive Summary PIR Type: Final PIRLast Saved' May 14, 2011 Date Range ot Data Jan-01-2010 - Dec-31-2010
, Losing Facility Name and Type:Street Address:
City:
State:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
Gaining Facility Name and Type:Street Address:
City:
State:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
SavingS/Costs
Function 1 Workhour Savings
Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings(less MainVTrans)
PCES/EAS Workhour Savings
Transportation SaVings
Maintenance Savings
Space Savings
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Savings
StaffingCraft Position Loss
Service
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC O/N)
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)
Customer Experience MeasurementOverall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level
Customer Experience MeasurementOverall SatisfactIOn Small Business at PFC level
Page 3 of 39
Queens P&DC14202 20th AveQueensNY110,111,113,114
Originating
Brooklyn P&DC1050 ForbelJ StBrooklynNY
Final PIR va Pre AMP
$14,670,135
$421,170
$2,334,793
($1,087,106)
$4,159,687
$0
$20,498,678
($203,697)
$20,294,981
350
Losing Current Qtr
94.81%
92.72%
90.39%
71.9%
76.6%
Final PIR va Approved
$8,533,783
$421,170
$2,080,934
($1,000,170)
$3,886,700
$0
$13,922,418
$938,868
$14,861,286
Gaining Current Qtr
92.99%
91.69%
89.38%
from Workhour Costs - Combined
from Other Gun- vs Prop
from Other CUrT vs Prop
from Transportation HeRand Transportation PVS
from Maintenance
from Space Evaluation and Other Costs
from Space Evaluation and Other Costs
from Staffing-Craff
from SeNioe Performance & CSM
from Service P9rformance & CSM
from SefVICe P9rformanc~ & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
from Service Performance &- CSM
PIR Executive Summary
-
Calculation ReferencesCombined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre AMP Proposed Final PIR
Function 1 Workhour Costs 13,058,292 $106,921,940 $98,388,157Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs
$3,226,142 $3,226,142 $2,804,972{lesS Maintenance & TransportatiOn)PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $16,761,783 $16,507,925 $14,426,990
Transportation Costs $25,608,038 $25,694,975 $26,695,144Maintenance Costs $41,550,218 $41,277,232 $37,390,532
Space Savings $0Total Annual Cost $200,204,473 $179,705,795
Total One-Time Costs $0
Total First Year $200,204,473 $192,485,648 $179,502,098
Staffing
Craft Position Total On-Rolls 2,410 2,324 2,060PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 195 161 146
Final PIR vs Proposed
Final PIR vs Pre-AMP(Approved) AMP Approved AMP
Function 1 Workhour Savings $14,670,135 $8,533,783 $6,136,352Non~Processjng Craft Workhour Savings $421,170 $421,170 $0(less Maint/Trans)
PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $2,334,793 $2,080,934 $253,859Transportation Savings
Maintenance Savings $4,159,687 $3,886,700 $272,986Space Savings
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs $938,868
Total First Year $20,294,981 $14,861,286 $5,433,695
StaffingCraft Position Loss 350 264 86
PCES/EAS Position Loss 49 15 34
PIR Executive SummaryPage 4 of 39
-
Summary NarrativeLast Saved: May 14, 2011
Losing Facility Name and Type:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
Queens P&DC110,111,113,114Originating
Gaining Facility Name and Type:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Brooklyn P&DC112,116
BackgroundThe Northeast Area In-Plant Support Office, with the assistance of the Triborn District, has completed thefinal (1 year) Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Queens P&DC to Brooklyn P&DC AMP to determineif the Postal Service increased efficiency by consolidating originating mail processing operations from theQueens P&DC to the Brooklyn P&DC from Monday to Friday. (All of Triboro is AMP to Morgan P&DC onSaturday) The consolidation moved originating meil processing for ZIP Codes 110, 111, 113 and 114 to theBrooklyn P&DC without modification to the operating plan. The transfer of originating volumes from theQueens P&DC to the Brooklyn P&DC was completed by January 1, 2010
The Queens P&DC to Brooklyn P&DC originating AMP was the second phase of the Triborn District plan toconsolidate both Staten Island P&DC and Queens P&DC originating operations into the Brooklyn P&DC.
A new postmark was developed to include the AMPs in he Triboro District and include Brooklyn, Queensand Staten Island as shown below.
TRIBORO NY 112BKLYN-QN&STATEN ISL
29 APR 2009 PM 4T
Total Annual SavingsTotal First Year Savings
Final PIR va.fr!.BMf
$20,498,678$20,294,981
Final PIR va.~$13,922,418$14,861,286
The 1st PIR savings is well above the proposed annual savings of $6,576,260. The majority of these savingswas a result of staffing position reductions in all crafts The consolidation shifted an approximate AverageDaily Volume of 771,167 originating FHP from the Queens P&DC to the Brooklyn P&DC
~There were no service downgrades as a result of the Queens to Brooklyn originating AMP. Below is theTTMS First Class mail service performance for Brooklyn P&DC. FCM EXFC goals were not achieved in PQ4 FY 10 missing by 0.35% while 2 day EXFC made goal with a strong 0047% and 3 day EXFC also missedgoal of 92.85% with a 92.09%. Q1 included peak season Christmas and severe winter weather whichaffected EXFC service with ON service at 92.99% due to a snowstorm he last week of PQ 1. PQ 1 FY 11Through 12125110 OIN service was 96.19% 2 day EXFC at 91.69% and 3 day EXFC at 8938%. We expectservice performance to stabilize shortly. We have service performance improvement teams within ourperformance cluster.
Ovemlg t I 2 DayFiscal Quarter I percen~ercenta e
022009 I 97.06% L 93:-.:::6~6"!
-
Staffing ImpactsThe approved AMP proposal identified a reduction of 86 craft and 3 EAS posi ions due to the consolidationsof Queens's P&OC originating mail processing operations into Brooklyn P&OC Complement data at the endof PQ 1 FY 11 shows the consolidated operations complement has been reduced by 350 craft and 49 EASposrtions. The staffing reductions were much higher than expected due to the volume loss and several costreduction activities that took place at the same time such as tour compression, craft re irement incentive,EAS staffing realignment, BPI improvement over SPLY, and other local mail initiative cost reductions suchas elimination of (3) UFSM & (1) LIPS machines, Registry and PIVMS position reductions. several vacantEAS posrtions have not been filled due to an Area freeze on hiring but will be in the near future.
SDO & MOO to craft ra ios are slightly below requirements. Sites are working with Area HR to bring ratiosinto proper alignment
MDOs+SDOs to Craft 1
(1 :22 target)
1 : 181 : 20
Craft = FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals, Craft = F1 + F4 at Losmg; F1 only at Gaining
MDOs+SDOs to Craft 1
(122 target)
1 : 201 : 19
Transportation ChangesThe approved AMP projected net annual transportation costs of (-$86,936). The final PIR (1 st PIR vs Pre-AMP) reflects a higher than projected annual transportation cost of (-$1 ,087,106) The breakdown of thesecosts were Brooklyn's PVS increased by (-$896,450) and their HCR also increased by (-$345,028) for a totalBrooklyn cost increase of (-$1 ,241 ,478). Queens saved on their PVS $168,907 but had a slight costincrease on their HCR of (-$14,536) for a total Queens savings of $154,371. The reasons for these increasecosts are as follows:
PVS Transportation: Gaining Facility - BrooklvnThe Brooklyn P&OC Final PIR is showing an increase of 68 schedules and 437,118 miles from the Pre-AMPstudy This has resulted in an approximate annual cost increase of $457,000. These increases were onlypartly attributable to AMP-related initiatives. There were new schedulesltrips added to improve the arrivalprofile of collection mail into the Brooklyn and compress the gap for 80% cancellations by 2000 Theseincluded new, direct service between the Brooklyn Plant to Jamaica; to Staten Island; to Queens and to theNorth and South Associate Offices (drayage that Queens MVS could not provide driver resources for).
There were non-AMP initiatives taken hat resulted in increased schedules and mileage in FY'10. Theseincluded new transportation trips in support of new/increased FCM-IPPS/Priority Mail volumes from mailingfirms and shippers (i.e. E-tronics, Gain Game, B&H Photo, Uncommon Goods, Cookies com, Mambate,Focus Camera, EZ Ink) as a result of diversion of these volumes from our competitors by our Sales force.Triboro is # 2 in the nation in new revenue from customer pickups
Other nOf1..AMP Initiatives that resulled in increased miles and schedules included the support of the "UltraPair" Transportation Network; the dosure of the NY Surface Transfer Center in the Bronx (HCR drayage)
Page 6 of 39
-
and the partial transfer of operations to the Queens Surface Transfer HUB (existing PVS drayage lane);"Sunday Key-In Program" (mail drops to 24 stations + Far Rockaway on Sundays).
HCR Transportation: Gaining Facility - BrooklynHCR Contract 112X1 (Brooklyn P&DC- DVD P&DC) had been proposed prior to the implementation of theAMP. This proposed HCR contract was never implemented, nor further pursued, as the Brooklyn volumesfor the DVD P&DC were redirected to the Queens P&DC for cross-dock onto existing service. The proposedcost of $233,016 was never realized.
HCR Contract 11229 (Brooklyn P&DC - NY STC) was terminated for convenience on September 27, 2010as a result of the closure of the NY Surface Transfer Center. Its annual rate was $494,214. Most of the mailvolumes (non-NEA destination long hauls) from this HCR Route was re-directed to the new NJ SurfaceTransportation Center onto HCR 112UO (Brooklyn P&DC - NJ NDC/NJ STC/Phlladelphia MTESC). Theadditional cost for this consolidated HCR route was $477,983. The net result between the terminated NYSTC service and the new NJ STC resulted in a savings of $16,231.
PVS Transportation: Losing Facilty - Queens:The Queens Final PIR shows an actual reduction of 35 schedules and 56,176 miles from the Pre-AMPstudy. It is showing an annual cost decrease of approximately $15,000. However, this reduction wasnot 100% attributable to AMP-related initiatives. The reductions were mostly the result of a Zero-basing oftransportation that was finalized earlier in the fiscal year. Several trips were consolidated/eliminated. Manyof these reductions were offset by the detouring of approximately 20 trips originating from Flushing,Jamaica, and North Shore/South Shore stations and Associate Offices into the Brooklyn Plant Theseservice changes resulted in increased mileage. The trips had previously arrived at the Queens Plant Thiswas done to help improve the mail arrival profile percentage to bridge the gap to 80% cancella ions by 2000.
HCR Transportation: Losing Facility - QueensThere was a reduction of approximately $12,000 for HCR contract 110LO (Queens P&DC - DVD P&DC) as aresult of a negotiated service change reSUlting in a reduction in service during the AMP.
MaintenanceThe AMP projected annual savings was $272,986. The Final PIR savings (1st PIR vs Pre AMP) reflects ahigher than projected savings of $4,159,687. The increased savings are attributed to the following:
Queens - Maintenance Work hour NarrativeThe Queens Maintenance Work hour SaVings variance Final PIR vs Pre-AMP of $1,227,953 consists of thefollowing.
LDC 36 - $747,788 savings is a result of the Queens AMP losing the following pieces of equipment 5-AFCS's, 5 - BDS, 5 - VFS, ASD, DPRC, 1-CANX, Video Jet IJP's and LMS010. A staffing review wasconducted resuning in a reduction of 11 positions, 6 ET's and 5 MPE's.LDC 37 $418,514 savings was achieved through the WHEP staffing Area reevaluation of workload.This reflected a reduction of 6 positions.LDC 38 - $1 ,887savings was achieved through workload reductions as a result of the tour compressionand MS -47reevaluation.LDC 39 $23,688 is a cost There were no proposed changes in the Maintenance Operations SupportstaffingLDC 93 - $83,453 saVings are due to the reduction of training hours due to the elimination of equipmentresulted by the AMP
queens - Maintenance Stockroom and SuppliesThe Queens Maintenance Stockroom and Supplies SaVings variance Final PIR vs Pre-AMP of $1 ,271 ,713consists of the follOWing.
Custodial & Building Supplies & Services - line 31 and 34 savings of $100,438 can be attributed to thetour compression.Maintenance Stockroom Supplies - savings of $232,125 line 33 and 37, reSUlted in a reduction ofequipment supported by the AMP.Fuel and Utili ies - Garbage Sewer & Trash Removal line 42 is no longer paid at the plant level and ispaid by the District which showed a $59,304 savings. 'Fuel and Utili ies - Line 42 Heating 011 and Gas Heating resulted in a $60,759 saVings and Electricityhad the greatest savings of $868,038. This was primarily due to the elimination of the mail processingequipment (AMP) running and the tour compression initiative.
Total Overall Savings of the Queens Final 1 Year PIR 2010 vs Pre-AMP is $2,499,666.
PIR Summary Narrative
Page 7 of 39
-
Brooklyn - Maintenance Work hour NarrativeThe work hour savings variance Final PIR vs Pre-AMP of $818,696 consists of he following:
LDC 36 $42,875 is a cost which reflects the additional LDC 36 hours that would be needed tosupport the relocated equipment that Brooklyn the gaining site was to maintain, 3 AFCS machines, 3Siemens VFS units and 2 DIOSS machines Post AMP Brooklyn removed 2 UFSM 1000 machines, 1ClOSS machine, 1 LIPPS machine and replaCed the mechanical traymech system with a new reducedfootprint system. Soon after the equipment was removed a staffing review was conducted andadjustments were made to accommodate the new equipment levels
LDC 37 $246,826 savings, there were no proposed changes in Building Equipment staffing and thework hour savings were achieved through WHEP staffing reductions and residual vacancies in Article12 withholding.
LDC 38 - $230,455 savings, there were no proposed changes in Building Services staffing and thework hour savings were achieved through MS-47 staffing reductions as a result of tour compression (9posi ions in total) and residual vacancies in Article 12 withholding.
LDC 39 - $237,349 savings, there were no proposed changes in Maintenance Operations Supportstaffing, the work hour savings were achieved through WHEP staffing reductions (1 position) andresidual vacancies in Article 12 withholding.
LDC 93 $146,940 savings, there were no proposed changes in Maintenance Training work hours,the savings came from Pre PIR training initiatives in preparation for the AMP. Prior to he AMPBrooklyn held MLDP and piloted the ET Trainee program in hopes of recruiting ET'sIMPE's to fill longstanding vacancies and were very successful in doing so. The new hires' were scheduled prior to theAMP so those work hours were not realized during the PIR period and were actually inflated prior inpreparation
Brooklyn - Maintenance Stockroom and SuppliesThe savings variance Final PIR vs Pre-AMP of $841,324 consists of the following
Garbage Sewer & Trash Removal no longer hits line 42 at the plant finance level it is paid by theDistrict which showed a savings of $80,000
Custodian Building Supplies & Services line 31 showed a savings of $66,429 which in large can beattributed to the tour compression.
Gas Heating line 42 shows a savings of $523,229, during this period the Heating/Cooling system wasreplaced with new high efficiency equipment resulting in these savings. The original system installed inthe Brooklyn Plant was a Hitachi Para flow Absorption Unit which provided heating and cooling in oneunit but ran exclusively on gas to support both func ions which is no longer the case.
Electricity line 42 shows a savings of $505,648, during this time period Headquarters initiated 2energy conservation (reduc ion) project in the Brooklyn Plant which impacted this line. The lighting inthe facility was replaced with high efficiency computer controlled lighting and all of the hea ing andventilation equipment was fitted with variable speed drives. The replacement of the obsolete traymechsystem and the reduced foot print of the new system had a major impact on facility electric usage, thenew system uses the latest power roller technology where as the original system used large motor anddrives to power the system.
Total Overall Savings of the Brooklyn Final 1 Year PIR 2010 vs Pre-AMP is $1,660,020,
One-Time Facility CostsThe AMP package identified a projected first year costs of (-$1,142,565) which inclUded an upgrade toBrooklyn's 010 loose mail system at a costs of (-$1 ,007,000) along with a cost of (-$135,565) for equipmentrelocations. The Brooklyn 010 LMS upgrade was stopped.
EqUipment RelocationThe original relocations costs of (-$135,565) which included relocation of 3 AFCS's and 2 DIOSS climbed incosts to (-$203,697) for an increase in costs of (-$68,132) The 3 AFCS's rose from (-$125,565) to(-$183,697) and the 2 DIOSS relocation costs rose from (-$10,000) to (-$20,000) for a (-$10,000) increase.
SummaryThe AMP proposal to move originating Queens P&DC volume to the Brooklyn P&DC projected an annualsavings of $6,576,260. The final PIR after implementation reflects annual savings of $20,498,678. Based onthe approved AMP, Queens was expected to reduce staffing by 86 craft positions and their actual reduc ionwas 176 positions plus further staffing reductions occurred at the Brooklyn site with another 174 craftpositions for a total PC reduction of 350 positions. Comparison of data used dUring the feasibility stUdy andthe PIR indicate a 29.1% decrease in annual TPH volume at Queens. Volume loss at Queens as weil asearly retirement incentives, tour compression and other local initiatives at both Queens and Brooklyn drovecomplement reductions above what we expected.
Page 8 of 39
PIR Summary Narrative
-
Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction MeasurementLast Saved: May 14, 2011
PIR Type:Implementation Date:
Losing Facility: -::Q;:.:u:,.:e:.::e.:..;ns.::...:-P:.::&:.;:D-:c:....- _District: Triboro
...:...;.:.::..::.;~-------------
After AMP
Gaining Facility: -=B;.:.,ro;.;o::.;.k:.;Jly~n;..;P...;&:;;D:;.C~ _District: ...;T.;.r;,:ib;,:o...;ro=-- _
Final PIR01/01/10
• Customar Salisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Expenence Measurament(CEM) in 2010 Data reffect. mo.t recently completed quarter availaOie in CEM
Overall Salisfaction (Overall Expenence)
Salisfaction WIth ReceIving (Expenence wrth recelvmg)
Satistactlon wrth Sending (Expenence WIth sending)
Satisfaction wrth most frequently VISIted PO (Expenence witlh most frequently visited PO)
Sallsfaction wrth most recent contact Wltlh USPS (Expenence With most recent contact wrth USPS)
Likely to recommend the USPS
01
04a
08a
012a016a
019
After AMP
(15) Notes _
Page 9 of 39
[1fi:t-----:..,;,7-----+-----:-;.,:.;.----i
Residential Top i
t=~~=l=~~#~~~~=j~~~~-~~f}~~O'·~-,__ 9.~11_---: __ . 61701o __! 613%
Q12a 59200% --i 56.4%" ..• __ ~ __ ._,,__ ..>_ ,.__u+ ~_,~ _.'__ ._.~_ ...__._ .'. _. _._ ...•._..__
Q16a! 427.% 440%Q19 71,9% 72,5%
PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement
-
PIRT
ype';"~';;;:;';~"PIIl""'O'Jiiimi==~s",ma;a=,..="""'I'\iii"""""I
Co
mb
ined
Facilities
IT
_o
fom
r-...C_0rJg!n!Il0!l
«n
/*'~~~~~m
!17
i~~SIn"
BQ
2~O
3alo:l5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t3iT
i"137T1
WortdlO
Ur
Co
sts·Com
binedF
ltcilitiesl...aIt5.....a
""
H.2
Dl1
o-~ofOata:~
to0le0)1
2110
..........
PlR
Wcrlh
ou
rC
osb
·~
F_
-
$7
4
$1
J,28
0
$57I
$7
5,9
72
,.FI~PlR$79,688
$1
,85
O.5
61
!$
1,6
J.(,57
4
S30,045
$2
7,5
65
\$
0$
1,6
S'U
34
I$
82
5,1
60
$3<
n
(11
/13
11126
214/;2142"3TI232'"233Tffi264726426S7265275i2752
85
/28
5295i2953
40
/34
0403T403~Q5T.105
40
6f
40
6~448
t448
i4
95
/49
5'
50
51
50
5547
!54
7~5
55
/55
5~~562
f56
2565TS656
07
/60
76
12
/61
26
l9f6
19
62OT
i0O~6T
iTifi7
793f
79
3i
81
3/8
13
i16T816~6/846
89
-
$0
$0$0$0'0 '0 $0$0 $0 $0$0 '0$"0$0$0$0 '0$0$0 '0 $0$0$0$0 $0$0$0$0 $0$0$0$0$0 $0 $0 '0$0 '0$0$0 '0 '0 .0 $0 $0$0$0 $0$0$0$0 $0 $0'0$0$0 .0 $0 $0 $0$0so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0 $0$0
$2
44
55
~$
67
9$18,852$16,252--W
$0
$32221$351,342
10
FIIlMF'rR
.........Annu.
WO
fiIho
ur
Co
sts
{11
PIR
Wo
rkho
ur
Co
sts~
Co
mb
ineQ
Facilities
-
fI
fl
t 00000000000000 0 00000000000000000000 0 00000000000000000 0 000000000000
JI
f1
j
iJ ~'0M...... ~i &:~l)'
-
PIR
Ty
pe
·~~;:.i::;::::,li::c~~RR~_=m-=""'"'~:-""=""=aJj"Z-="'''fO-='=FirstPlR
PIR
Wo
rkho
ur
Co
sts
·Losing
1)
losin
gF
acility.::Q"'u:::e6::;".:.:.:..;P...:&::D::..:C"-
_
Typ
eo
fD
istribu
tion
Co
ns
olid
ate
dO
riginating
Wo
rkho
ur
Co
sts-
Lo
sing
FacU
ltyLast
SilV
edM
ay14.
201t
IF
un
ction1
11I
$.46.06
uI$52..
.13
$48.6214
$.4QS7
15~'
$31.651
10
-•
17!
$42.3319
I$
38
.15
Date
Ran
ge
of
Data
Jan..Q
1·2010to
"'-$
0$
0$
0$0$0$0$0
$848,201$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
$11,835$1,339,508
$0$0$565.665
$1,928,031$1,964,450
$0
$0$0
$0$0$0$0$0$0ro
$424,990$500,249
$0
$510,629$114,572
$0
$0
$0
$44,065$2,251,283
$0$201,104$103,829
559,804$1S
4.493$48,403$68.835
$0$0$0
$100,456$38,021$
83
21
6$1,696,917
$96$1,2\l6,09ll$1,638.642$2,107,058
$188.050
Dec..J1·201Q,..
FinalPtR
$405.193$0$0$0$0
$25.604$0$638.932
$0
$149,701--$
0-
$1
5,3
14
$107,973$
0$0$77,824
$107,227$916,248$
36
7,1
13
$188,564$674,822
$2,284,796$1,794,747
$149,896$0$
0$T
iS$22,786
$0
$0$0$0$0$752,339$502,835$121,231$235,243$121.918
$0$28,617
$5,053$0$2,566,841$0
$105,164$41,407$27,S
45$193,979
$63,499$57,677$14.569$14,334$11,266$66,875$42,270
$183.961$1,476,800
$0$1,171,398$1.461,671$1,965,925
$150.369
-
(11
Page
15o
f39
No
Ca
leN
oC
alc'N
oC
aIe
No
Calc'
No
Ca
leN
oC
alcN
oC
ale
No
Ca
lcN
oCaJc
NoC
ak:N
oC
aIe
No
Cate
No
Ca
ieN
oC
a4cN
oCak
No
Ca
IeN
oC
No
Ca
leN
oCale!
No
Ca
No
No
Ca
ic
An
nu
atW
orkh
ou
rC
osts
p-$451
5948,949$1,248,114
$32,2745520,401
$26,826$2,778,22251,594,579
$0$0$1,297
$273.074$7.706
$352,536$10,127
$990,822$656,361$792,901
$1,778,1675974,662
$15,489$44,536$11,478$0$0$0$0$0
$0$0
$288,3285191,825
$1,152,950$
0$05388,944
$05129,281
$244$0$25
$2,329.6435393,887
53,612$5,265,138$2,775,912
$1,441
Fin.aJPlR
$0
51,368,492$1,026,747
$0
$1
79
,05
2$814
$2,4oo,5M$1,554,287
$331,456$457,017
$111551,104
57,826575,005
555$38,604
$1,21351,615,45151,061,317$0
$9845366$0
537,77151,208,295
$355,699$1,416,617
5379,098$49,377
$4,258$406,472$189,837
$1,048,55251,251$0$0
$168$
05156$0$0
$2,057,848$439,113
$2,027$6,461,69852,539,109
$0
$0
$447,700$368$138
$822,318536,883$75,972
$2,751$8$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$
0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$
0$
0$0$0
PIR
Wo
rkho
ur
Co
sts-
Lo
sing
-
PIAType'
"~'
-
~$324.211
..!!!.H
41
01
.l1l8
$f1
allS
Osol!!.SO
lO4.l!l2
RIM
......PlIl
$OO
QJl21
1,~.378
~$3JH2.tS
1so$
38
7,1
51
t.213.7~
"iO
.-~al'~~S4.~
so$3<~1
1010"iOSOJC
$2.3-10.187
$..-''''''
$5,Q<
40:.?M.$
2,n
4.3
03~$(10,127
$C1
1,0
70
$1.fI07
'"-!1.$1O
Il$
2:l2
,eH$t1.D
64~_.-$Z5e.
~
~:~>160
$0
$1,~.51"
..l!!.1
8'-
;$17Letl2
san
.53
7
~$
0,t
.22'0.883
~$C
$8
3$4G
6,OtO
S3e0JI~
$'41S
352$2,374
$I)
$0
$1
$I)
$tO
PR
WO
OID
oufCo
m-G
""""'l
-
IO
ther
Wo
rkho
ur
Mo
veA
nalysis
ILosing
FacWty
Queens
P&
DC
Gam
ingFacW
tyB
rooklynP
&D
CD
ate
Ra
ng
eo
fD
ata'01101110
to12131110
38747
$4
4635
87
$4
39
66
33~461945
38$
90
21
3$
90
21
3$
75
26
36
75
0$
8,1
68
31
1$
77
59
89
6$
74
21
,25
23
6$
76
17
75
4$8
02
0M
O$
76
61
,11
289
470$119
$119$
08
9$
0$
0$
089
515$
94
70
$9
47
0$
21
39
89
$1
06
60
$1
06
60
$0'82
57
0$
12
34
59
$1
23
45
9$66
78
782
$0
$0
$0
82571
$3
45
$345$
082
$0
$0
$0
03
581$168,687
$1
68
68
7$198,665
03
$7
18
,88
8$718,688
$716,86502
582$
32
58
82
$325,682$
22
70
18
02$
36
90
39
$3
69
03
9$380,615
346
14
$1
08
37
9$108
37
9$
43
55
234
$0
$0$14,496
39
61
6$100,507
$100,507$100,930
39
$6
77
10
$67,710$58,175
316
17
$2
91
72
$2
91
72
$41,46831
$1
62
62
$16,262$36,737
39
62
4$
11
03
2$
11
03
2$
30
90
39$
27
76
84
$277,684$242
15
039
634$
10
0$100
$7
939
$0$
05
42
503
67
3$679,985
$8
79
,98
5$566,237
03
$64,216$84,216
$0
356
76
$2
35
$2
35
SO3
5$
0$
0$0
316
79
$408714
$4087
14
$3
80
96
731
$4
64
26
5$464
26
5$
49
72
50
39
74
5$
80
68
77
$8068
77
$8381
05
39
$9
83
50
8S
98
35
08
$7
90
80
438
74
9$244
$244$
038
$5
95
$5
95
$84636
751S
728$728
SO3
6$
69
7$
69
7$
21
337
75
3$
27
14
10
2$
27
14
10
2$
22
95
58837
$1
60
8,4
36
$1
,60
84
36
$1
41
9,2
64
32761
$4
46
$4
46
SO32
$0
$0
$0
32762
$1
37
$137SO
32$
0$
0$0
317
63
$1269
23
$1
26
92
3$137,503
315
41
81
8$
41
81
8SO
31764
$7
53
68
$75,368$
81
,60
831
$0
$0
SO3
47
65
$84
31
,55
2$
8,4
31
55
2$
8,2
31
03
334
$7,878,230$7,878,230
$8,387,24534
76
6$
16
89
73
2$
1,6
89
73
2$
1,7
45
88
23
4$
27
14
08
0$
27
14
08
0$
26
62
98
98
95
10
$3551
63
$9
8$
98
$2,00634
60
5$
10
19
33
82$
66
66
6$
66
66
6$
70
50
46
5691
$1
71
68
18
3$
66
81
3$
66
81
3$437
$5
67
07
$5
6707
$481$
28
3$263
$8
6$
65
06
7$65,067
$0
$1
89
$1
89
$8
89
$3
42
65
43
$3,426543
$812$746,559
$746,559$95,601
$1
55
4$1,554
$278$
29
4$294
$3
21
0,7
82
$688,904$
3,0
35
PIR
Oth
er
Wo
rkho
ur
Co
sts
-
Totals.
692.?&!
631,986623,1l65
$2
6,6
«,0
95
$28,166,725$27,121,012
Page
22o
f39
Totals
666,812675,762
620,081$27,374,608
$27,777.795$:27,018,071
PIR
Other
Workhour
Costs
-
10
69
8$
1.1
95
70
5$944
60
7$1
23
99
35
106
98
$0
$164187
$010
70
0$840,727
$672581
$197,91810
70
0$5,812
$8
82
71
$010
92
7$738,741
$6
57
48
0$
46
1,0
92
109
27
$1,056,858$1,058
85
8$694
04388
45
9$
14
6$146
$0
884
59
$0$
0$0
88
477$
33
$33$
088
47
7$
66
$6
6$
86
35
62
4$
68
0$
68
0$
035
62
4$
35
$3
5$
1,3
36
106
30
$24$24
$0
106
30
$0
$0
$5
59
88
0671
$70,143$70,143
$1
55
30
18
0671
$2
47
53
6$247,536
$191,6353
06
79
$4
98
71
$4
98
71
$6
91
92
30
67
9$
0$0
$0
106
99
$364397
$3643
97
$3
77
18
510
69
9$509
$509$0
10701
$2
01
6898
$2
016898
$11
72
57
01
0701
$0$
0$0
307
58
$96,927$96,927
$030
75
8$
82
74
3$82,743
$8
92
36
30
75
9$721,888
$721,888$
71
3,6
93
30
75
9$
10
97
59
6$
10
97
59
6$1,236,791
01922
$1
24
73
6$
12
47
36
$133,08601
922$
11
03
79
$1
10
37
9$1
359
33
$1
99
65
4$199
65
4$
=1
39
35
933$
90
37
5$90
37
5$1
35951
$1,820,884$
1,8
20
88
4$1,768,141
35
951$
1,3
14
87
7$
1,3
14
87
7$1,3
88474
$03
0901
$111$111
$7
97
10702
~90,526
109
28
$4
,07
44
33
$4
,07
44
33
$3
,50
86
60
$4
38
,99
9$443,637
$69,048
PIR
Oth
er
Wo
rkho
or
Co
sts
-
II I
~~
0)
'"'0'"'t"~ NQ)0>
'"a..~
-
To
tals7,289
72
89
2,.13$248,3"3
$2
.8,3
"3$87,263
Totals2J1,777
2J1,77715,025
$1,028,633$1,028,633
$570,068
ID
istributionto
Other
PIR
Worksheet
TabsI
Page
25o
f39
PlR
Oth
er
Wo
rkho
ur
Co
sts
-
Tr~.sPOftlltiM
0
M-'ntanW
lce:0
Su
aa
$0
a0
$0a
0$
00
0$0
a0
$00
0$
08
66
96
4$
37
13
38
91
,8
75
03
6$36
9235
70
00
$0
a0
$08
45
,67
0$36,158,017
After
889,290$
37
,57
34
03
00
$0
00
$0
0$0
Adl
0$
0
00
$00
0$
07
45
00
1$
33
80
9054
PIR7
85
273$
35
41
43
50
00
$0
00
$0
84
56
70
$3
61
58
01
78
89
29
0$
37
57
34
03
00
$00
0$
0
00
$0
00
$0a
a$
0a
a$
00
0$0
00
$0
00
$0
00
$0
To
talA
di0
$0T
ot.IAd,
a$
0
Page
26o
f39
PIR
Olh
er
Worl<
hourC
ost>
-
Staffing - CraftLast Saved May 14, 2011
PIR Type: Final PIR
Losing Facility: Queens P&DC
Craft Positions
Function 1 • ClerkFunction 4 - ClerKFunction! Mail HandlerFunction 4 Mail HandlerFunction 3A Vehicle ServiceFunction 38· MaintenanceFunctions 67-£9 . LmtdlRehabiWCOther Functions
Total
Data Extraction Date: 01(15111
CllangeAOlllysis
Po.1tloMPereent
(10)1st PIR vsPreAMP
{Hal
Data Extraction Date: 01(15111 Varianc.s Total On-Rolls
Pereent
(21)
Change Final P1R VlI Final PIR vsAnalv*is Pre AMP Pn:;poS
-
Page 28 of
Staffing - PCES/EAS
Losing Facillty:-:Otu;Qn==,,~P&;;::.;;.OC;::;.- _Data EJ
-
Gmlng Facility: ~Bc::.;oolt=;:,I!yn~P..::&:,:,D:-,,:C,=,.- _Ollta Exlra
-
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
-P
VS
last
Sa
ved
:M
ay
14,2011
-to
-D
ec-31-2010
PIR
Typ
e:
FinalP
IR
Date
Range
ofD
ata:Jan-01-2010
$0 68426,446
$376,526
6S437,118$0
$385,064
(9)V
arianceF
ina
l PIR
vsP
reA
MP
o 93 8$0 16 43
(a)
PIR
$533,986
$1,481,031
$1
1,5
84
,22
3
$11,050,235
13
$0 o
44 (7)
11 1D
$1,104,505
Ga
inin
gF
acUlty:~r.:.n:...P.;;.;&DC=--------------_
_F
ina
nce
Nu
mb
er:_
$504,043
$9,916,915
$10,480,958
$513,252
$10,121,284
$10,634,536
(2)(3)
(4)(5)
Va
rian
ceV
aria
nce
Pro
po
sed
Fin
al
PIR
Fin
alP
IRvs
Fin
alP
IRvs
Pre
AM
PP
ron
ose
d
4750
88
98
23
22
230195
1,519,4011,480,595
$1,215,593$1,214,008
II
Ir:=PVSLeases
$~I$~I
$ol$0'I
TotalV
eh
lde
sL
ea
sed
To
talLease
Co
sts
Lo
sing
Fa
cility:Queeos!""'P_&....;DC.....;...
_F
inanceN
um
be
r:~'-
_
(11)T
ota
lFinalP
IRvs
Pre
AM
PT
ran
spo
rtatio
n-P
VS
savin
gs:
$727,542(T
hIsn
um
be
radded
tothe
ExecutIV
eS
umm
ary(12)
To
talF
ina
lPIR
vsP
rop
ose
dT
ran
spo
rtatio
n-P
VS
savin
gs:
$732,828(T
hisn
um
be
raddedto
theE
xecutIVe
Sum
mary
)
(13)N
otes:=====
Pa
ge
30
01
39P
IRT
ransportation-
PV
S
-
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
-He
RLastS
aved:M
ay14,
2011
11
0L
O
Route
#
#DIV
lO!
#DIV
/O!
#DlV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/Ol
#DIV
/Ol
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
lOI
#DIV
IOI
PIR
Type:
Fin
alP
IR
CT
for
Outbound
Dock:
(1)
Fin
alP
IRA
nn
ua
lC
ost
(6)(4)
(3)
Lo
sing
Fa
cility:...:Q..::..u_e_e..::..n..::..s_P_&...:.,D......C:....-_
Typ
eo
fD
istribu
tion
Co
nso
lida
ted
:O
rigin
atin
g
Da
tao
fH
CR
Da
taF
ile:
01/01/11i
ooo oooo o oooo oo oooo oo ooo oo o (1)
Pag
e31
of39
PIR
Transportation
He
R-
Losing
-
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
-P
VS
last
Sa
ved
:M
ay
14,2011
-to
-D
ec-31-2010
PIR
Typ
e:
FinalP
IR
Date
Range
ofD
ata:Jan-01-2010
$0 68426,446
$376,526
6S437,118$0
$385,064
(9)V
arianceF
ina
l PIR
vsP
reA
MP
o 93 8$0 16 43
(a)
PIR
$533,986
$1,481,031
$1
1,5
84
,22
3
$11,050,235
13
$0 o
44 (7)
11 1D
$1,104,505
Ga
inin
gF
acUlty:~r.:.n:...P.;;.;&DC=--------------_
_F
ina
nce
Nu
mb
er:_
$504,043
$9,916,915
$10,480,958
$513,252
$10,121,284
$10,634,536
(2)(3)
(4)(5)
Va
rian
ceV
aria
nce
Pro
po
sed
Fin
al
PIR
Fin
alP
IRvs
Fin
alP
IRvs
Pre
AM
PP
ron
ose
d
4750
88
98
23
22
230195
1,519,4011,480,595
$1,215,593$1,214,008
II
Ir:=PVSLeases
$~I$~I
$ol$0'I
TotalV
eh
lde
sL
ea
sed
To
talLease
Co
sts
Lo
sing
Fa
cility:Queeos!""'P_&....;DC.....;...
_F
inanceN
um
be
r:~'-
_
(11)T
ota
lFinalP
IRvs
Pre
AM
PT
ran
spo
rtatio
n-P
VS
savin
gs:
$727,542(T
hIsn
um
be
radded
tothe
ExecutIV
eS
umm
ary(12)
To
talF
ina
lPIR
vsP
rop
ose
dT
ran
spo
rtatio
n-P
VS
savin
gs:
$732,828(T
hisn
um
be
raddedto
theE
xecutIVe
Sum
mary
)
(13)N
otes:=====
Pa
ge
30
01
39P
IRT
ransportation-
PV
S
-
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
-He
RLastS
aved:M
ay14,
2011
11
0L
O
Route
#
#DIV
lO!
#DIV
/O!
#DlV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/Ol
#DIV
/Ol
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
lOI
#DIV
IOI
PIR
Type:
Fin
alP
IR
CT
for
Outbound
Dock:
(1)
Fin
alP
IRA
nn
ua
lC
ost
(6)(4)
(3)
Lo
sing
Fa
cility:...:Q..::..u_e_e..::..n..::..s_P_&...:.,D......C:....-_
Typ
eo
fD
istribu
tion
Co
nso
lida
ted
:O
rigin
atin
g
Da
tao
fH
CR
Da
taF
ile:
01/01/11i
ooo oooo o oooo oo oooo oo ooo oo o (1)
Pag
e31
of39
PIR
Transportation
He
R-
Losing
-
oooooooooooooT
otals
oooooooooooooo45,291
$0
Va
rian
ces
To
tal
An
nu
al
Co
sts
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
lO!
#DIV
/O!
Page
32o
f39
Ch
ang
eA
nalysis
Do
llars
PlH
"cent
(11
)
Final
PIRv
sP
reA
MP
$14,5360.0%
(12
)
Final
PIR'r.>
Pro
po
sed
$219,770O.O"/O
PIR
Transportation
He
R-
Losing
-
Tran
spo
rtation
-H
eR
LastS
aved:M
ay
14,2011
#OlV
fOI
#OIV
IO!
#OIV
IOI
#OIV
/O!
#OIV
IOl
#OIV
/o1
#OIV
/O!
#OIV
/OI
#OIV
IOI
#OIV
/Oi
#OIV
fOI
#0
1V
i0!
#O
lv/OI
#OIV
/OI
#OIV
/O!
#OIV
/O!
#O
IV/o
!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
fOl
#OlV
fOI
#OlV
fOI
#OIV
/OI
#OIV
IOI
(10)
Fin
al
PIR
An
nu
al
Co
stIMlle
(9)
PIR
Typ
e:
Orig
ina
ting
PIR
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
He
R-
Ga
inin
g
CE
Tfo
rO
GP
:
CT
for
Ou
tbo
un
dD
ock:
(7)(6
)
Pro
po
se
dI
Fin
al
PIR
An
nu
al
An
nu
al
Co
st
Co
st
ce
Tfo
rC
an
cella
tion
s:
i
CE
Tfo
rIn
bo
un
dD
ock:
(4)
()() ()() o()oo ()o ()oo ()o ()() ()()() () ()() ()() ()
(3)
Ga
inin
gF
acility:
.:B::.:.;rOO::.:.k~ly:.:..:n:..:.P..:&:.:DC:.::.---:"
_
Type
ofD
istributionC
onsolidated:O
rigin
atin
g
Date
ofH
CR
Data
File:
,j
oo o() oo ooo o oo oo oo oo() (1)
11
22
9
112X1
112UO
Ro
ute
#
-
oooooooo552,864
538,085
Va
rian
ces
To
tal
An
nu
al
Co
sts
#DIV
fOI
#D1V
fOl
#D
IVfO
l
#DIV
IOI
#D
IVfO
l
#DIV
fOI
#DIV
IOI
#OlV
fO
Su
mm
ary
He
RL
osin
g&
Ga
inin
g
Ch
an
ge
An
alysis
Do
llars
Percent
lol;j
Galnin
(13
)I
(14
)F
ina
lPIR
vsP
reF
ina
lPIR
V5
AM
PP
roo
ose
d
$1
4,5
36
I$
21
9,7
70
$,345,028I
$47,571
(13
)T
ota
lF
ina
lP
IRvs
Pre
AM
PT
ran
spo
rtatio
n-H
CR
Sa
vin
gs:
(from
10sIOg
an
dg
ain
mg
facilitie
s)$
35
95
&4
(14
)T
ota
lF
ina
lP
IRva
Pro
po
se
dT
ran
spo
rtatio
n-H
CR
Sa
ving
s:(fro
mlo
sing
an
dg
ain
ing
facilitie
s)$267,341
IOIliII
(15
)(16)
Fin
alP
IRvs
Pre
Fin
alP
IRvs
AM
PP
rop
ose
d
HeR
$3
59
,56
4$267,341
PV
S$
72
7,5
42
$7
32
,82
8
(15
)T
ota
lF
ina
lP
IRva
Pre
AM
PT
ran
sp
orta
tion
(PV
S&
HC
R):
$1
,08
7,1
06
(Th
isn
um
be
rca
rne
dfO
lWard
toth
eE
xecu
liveS
um
ma
ry)
(16
)T
ota
lF
ina
lPIR
vaP
rop
ose
dT
ran
sp
orta
tion
(PV
S&
HC
R):
(Th
isnum
berca
rried
forw
ard
toth
eE
xecutiveS
um
ma
ry)
$1
,00
0,1
70
Pa
ge
34o
f39
PIR
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
He
R-
Ga
inin
g
-
Data
Extractio
nD
ate:-----
MP
EIn
vento
ryLast
Saved
:M
ay14,
2011
PIR
Typ
e:Final
PIR
Date
Ran
ge
of
Data:
Jan-01-2010
-to
-D
ec-31-2010
$135,565I
$203,697
(6)(7)
(8)(9)
Pro
po
sedF
inal
P'R
Va
rian
ce
!nF
inal
PIR
I'NilR
elocatio
nR
elocatio
nC
osts
Co
atsC
osts
8$125,565
$183,697
2$
0$
0
0$
0$
0
0$
0$
0
0$
0$
0
1$
0$
0
1$
0$
0
0$
0$
0
30So
$0
0$
0$
0
£)t:!!
$10,000$20,000
0i'i'
$0
$0
0$
0$
0
0$
0$
0
0$
0$
0
2$
0$
0
0$
0$
0
2$
0$
0
0$
0$
0
0So
SO0
$0
$0
0$
0$
0o o o 2 2o o 6o 2o 3o oo° o o II30 (5)
UF
SM
CS
BC
S
UP
S
TA
BB
ER
FS
S
ClO
SS
AP
PS
DIO
SS
DB
CS
SP
BS
AF
SM
-Ai
AF
SM
100
DB
CS
-OS
S
MLO
CR
-tSS
MP
BC
S-O
SS
AF
SM
AT
HS
LCT
SLC
US
AF
SM
-ATH
SIA
J
Eau
iDm
ent
RO
BO
TG
AN
TR
Y
HS
TS
fHS
US
Gain
ing
Faclllty:....B....rook
........;;..
-
Ma
inte
na
nce
La
stS
ave
d:
Ma
y1
4,2
01
1
Lo
sing
Fa
cility:Q
ueensP
&D
C----------------
Da
teR
an
ge
ofD
ata:
Ga
inin
gF
acility:
PIR
Type':.:.F.:.;.in;::a::..''--PI.:.R'--
_Ja
n-0
1-2
01
0D
ec-3
1-2
01
0
Bro
oklyn
P&
DC
(10
)V
aria
nce
Fin
alP
IRto
Pre
(8)(9)
Va
rian
ceF
ina
lP1R
Fin
alP
IRto
Co
stsP
reA
MP
(7)
Pro
po
sed
Co
sts
$8,021.637
$7,661,325
$4
28
75
---
$2,354,994
$2
10
8,1
68
$
---
$3,517,351
$3,286,895
$1,328,908
$1,091,554
$383,850
$236,910
$
---
15,606,735$
14,384,852$
!122~(83)
Wo
rkho
ur
Activity
~(3
)(4
)(5
)V
aria
nce
Va
rian
ceP
rop
os,""
Fin
al
PIR
Fin
alP1R
toF
ina
lPIR
toC
osts
Co
stsP
reA
MP
Pro
ose
d
$7,760,624
$7,421,252
\747,783}$
{J39
,37
2}
$2,714,102
$2,295,588
{41
SS
14
'i$
\41
85
i4)
$4,396,878
$4,461,945
1!,8
8i1
$6
5,0
67IE"
$918,516
$942,204
23,66S$
23,688IlD
C39
$92,922
$9,470
18:\A:'<~j
$!83,453}
---
15,883,042$
15,130,459$
{75
?S
-S4
)
Wo
rkho
urA
ctivity
lDC
39
EB
uild
ing
Eq
uip
me
nt
$
~B
uild
ing
Se
rvices
$(C
usto
dia
lCle
allln
gj
EM
ail
Pro
cessin
gE
qu
ipm
en
t$
Parts
andS
uppliesP
artsand
Su
pp
lies
Ma
inte
na
nce
Sto
ckroo
m$
andS
up
plie
s
20,893,102$
18,637,036
'J34
1S
3)
$
o
4,252,1845,288,387
$G
randT
otali2_49:~"BBGi
S
11
27
17
D)
$i8
7S
05
01
$4,501,087
$G
randT
otal
Ma
inte
na
nce
Sto
ckroo
mand
(These
nu
mb
ers
carriedforw
ardto
theE
xecufJveS
um
ma
ry)
(These
nu
mb
ers
carriedforw
ardto
theE
xecuoveS
um
ma
ry)
_($
4,1
59
68
7)
_(S
3,8
(67
00
)
(11)F
ina
lPIR
vsP
reA
MP
-M
ain
ten
an
ceS
avln
as:---..;.
(12)F
ina
lPIR
vsP
rop
ose
d-
Ma
inte
na
nce
Sa
vlna
s:---...;...--...;...---(13)
No
tes:
_
"Da
tain
PIR
c-o!umos
ISa
nn
ua
lized
forF"irst
P!R
Pa
ge
36o
f39-.
PIR
Ma
inte
na
nce
-
Distrib
utio
nC
han
ges
LastSaved:
May
14,2011
PIR
Typ
e:
Fin
al
PIR
Da
teR
an
ge
of
Da
ta:
Jan-01-2010--
to--
Dec-31-2010
Was
the
Se
rviceS
tan
da
rdD
irecto
ryu
pd
ate
dfo
rth
ea
pp
rove
dA
MP
?
(3)Y
es.
Jan
ua
ry1
,20
10
Ide
ntify
the
da
teo
fthe
Po
stalB
ulle
tinth
atco
nta
ine
dD
MM
lab
elin
glist
revisio
ns.
(2)
De
cem
be
r1
20
09
Lo
sin
gF
acility
:...:Q:.;u:.:e:.,:e:.:..n:.::s-:P...:&=.:D=-C=-_
Type
ofD
istribu
tion
Co
nso
lida
ted
:O
rigin
atin
g
Place
a..x..
ne
xttoth
eD
MM
lab
elin
gIist(s)
revise
da
sre
sult
ofth
ea
pp
rove
dA
MP
.
DM
MlO
01
DM
Ml0
11
DM
MlO
02
XD
MM
l20
1
DM
MlO
03
DM
Ml6
01
DM
MlO
04
DM
Ml6
02
DM
MlO
05
DM
Ml6
03
DM
MlO
06
DM
Ml6
04
DM
MlO
07
DM
Ml6
05
DM
MlO
08
DM
Ml6
06
DM
MlO
09
DM
Ml6
07
DM
Ml0
10
DM
Ml8
01
(1)
(4)D
rop
Sh
ipm
en
tsfo
rD
estin
atio
nE
ntry
Dis
co
un
ts
FA
ST
Ap
po
intm
en
tSu
mm
ary
Re
po
rtN
AS
ST
ota
lN
o-S
ho
wL
ate
Arriva
lO
penM
on
thL
osin
qI
Ga
inin
qF
acilitv
Co
de
Fa
cilityN
ame
Clo
sed
Un
schd
Sch
dC
ou
nt
%C
ou
nt
%C
ou
nt
%C
ou
nt
%C
ou
nt
No
v'10
Lo
sing
Fa
cility110
Queens
P&
DC
75
79
01
1.8
9%
30
84
0.6
9%
a0
.00
%6
67
88
.11
%9
De
c'10
Lo
sing
Fa
cility110
Queens
P&
DC
60
294
15
.61
%2
42
40
.20
%0
0.0
0%
50
88
4.3
9%
18
No
v'10
Ga
inin
gF
acility
112B
rooklynP
&D
C751
15
92
1.1
7%
31
84
2.3
4%
00
.00
%591
78
.70
%2
Dec
'10G
ain
ing
Fa
cility112
Brooklyn
P&
DC
59
61
46
24
.50
%2
32
38
.93
%0
0.0
0%
45
07
5.5
0%
6
(5)N
ote
s:===========
Page
37o
f39
PIR
Distribution
Ch
an
ge
s
-
Cu
stom
er
Se
rviceIssu
es
lasl_
Na
y14,
2011
Lo
sing
Facility;-.,;:Queens==-'--'-_P-:;,;&.:;,.DC-'C-
_S
-Oigit
ZIP
Code:
11351D
ataE
xtractionD
ate:""0-:'111"""6/'="1::-1------
Sat.
1
-
Space Evaluation and Other CostsLast Saved May 14, 2011
Losing Faclllty:..::Q"'u"'e.:::cen"'s"-P'-'&::;O::.C::::.- _
1. Affected Facility
Oate:__--:::0.::2/:.;::0.:::;3/...:.1.:..1 _
Facility Name: Queens P&DCStreet Address' 14202 20th AveCity, State ZIP: Queens NY
2. One-Time Costs
3, Savings Information
Enter anyone-time costs: _..:;$",,1,.:;;00:.;7,:,:,000=_
Space Savings ($) __...;$0;.;...__
$0 ':)~OQ700Q;
(These numbers shown below under On&-Time COsts section.)
$0 $0
(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)
4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain,
The vacated space from the removal of the AFCS machines in Queens was used for BX STC operations move to Queens P&DC
The proposed costs for a new loose mail system in Brooklyn P&DC for the 010 operation was stopped.
5. Notes:
Employee Relocation Costs
Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs(from MPE Inventory)
Facility Costs(from above)
Total One-Time Costs
$0 $0 $0
$135,565 $203,697 $68,132
$1,007,000 SO ($1 007000)
$1,142,565 $203,697 ($938868)PIR costs carried forward to Executive Summary)
Losing Faclllty:....:Q:..:u;.:e.;:.e:.;.ns'--P&;;:cO::....::.C _ Gaining Faclllty:_S'-roo-"--k...'y'-n'-P....:&....:O'-C'-- _
(1)
Product
Page 39 of 39
(4) (5)
Range of Report
P R Space Evaluation and Other Costs