Ion Implantation -...

11
EE 432/532 ion implantation – 1 Ion Implantation Two-step diffusion Q = 2N S p Dt p N s solid solubility limit huge. To get a low dose requires small Dt, which is difficult to control. Ion implantation small, controllable doses profiles can be tailored, not restricted to error function or gaussian profiles much faster one wafer completed in seconds low-temperature (sort of), so more flexibility in processing Expensive !!

Transcript of Ion Implantation -...

Page 1: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 1

Ion Implantation

Two-step diffusion

Q =2NS

pDtp

⇡Ns → solid solubility limit → huge.

To get a low dose requires small Dt, which is difficult to control.

Ion implantation• small, controllable doses• profiles can be tailored, not restricted to error function or gaussian profiles• much faster → one wafer completed in seconds• low-temperature (sort of), so more flexibility in processing

Expensive !!

Page 2: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 2

sample chamberx,y

scanning

gas inlet

plasma

source

ion mass

separator

B

V

V

ion acceleration

25 kV - 1 MV

Ion implantation system• Ions (B+, P+, As+) are created in a plasma. (We’ll study it later.)• Desired ions are filtered out using mass separation.• Dopant ions are accelerated to high energies (25 keV – 1 MeV).• Ion beam is deflected and rastered across the wafer surface.

Page 3: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 3

Example of a “smallish” ion implanter.

Page 4: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4

ion stopping

nuclear – ion cores interact• incoming ion is strongly deflected• lattice atoms are knocked out of place

+

ion

lattice

electronic – ion interacts interacts with

electron cloud of the lattice.• energy is lost as the ion drags through cloud• similar to viscous friction

Page 5: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 5

• In stopping the ions, most of the energy is lost through electronic interactions.• Nuclear interactions still have a strong effect – randomized motion and

crystal damage.• Detailed theories for nuclear stopping in solids have existed for several

decades. Linhardt, Scharff, and Schiott (c. 1963) provided the first unified treatment that could be applied to semiconductors. Known as LSS theory. The treatment is beyond our purposes here, but you are welcome to read further on your own.

• Higher energies → deeper range and more straggle.

• Lighter ions → deeper range and more straggle.

Range → average depth

straggle → deviation or variance

The theory provides a statistical description of the dopant profile.

Page 6: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 6

0.01

0.1

1

10 100 1000

boronphosphorusantimonyarsenic

rang

e (µ

m)

implant energy (keV)

B

P

As

Sb

0.001

0.01

0.1

10 100 1000

boronphosphorusantimonyarsenic

stra

ggle

(µm

)

implant energy (keV)

B

P

As

Sb

Range and straggle for implants into silicon

Rp and ∆Rp are determined by ion energy.

Page 7: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 7

Implant profile

N (x) =

Qp2⇡�Rp

exp

"� (x�Rp)

2

2 (�Rp)2

#

Q → dose

Rp → range (average depth of ion travel)

∆Rp → straggle (variance in ion depth)

Q is fixed by the implant time

Q =1

q

Z t

0Ibeam (t0) dt0

1014

1015

1016

1017

1018

1019

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

N (c

m–3

)x (µm)

NP

RP

∆RP

NP =Qp

2⇡�RP

peak concentration

simplest description

Measure the beam current. Stop after the required amount of charge (in the form of dopant atoms) has arrived.

Page 8: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 8

Junction depthsame as diffusion – look for where doping profiles cross

1014

1015

1016

1017

1018

1019

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

N (c

m–3

)

x (µm)

NP

RP

∆RP

xj1 xj2

NB

N (xj) = NB

NB = NP exp

"� (xj �Rp)

2

2 (�Rp)2

#

xj = Rp ±p2 (�RP )

ln

✓NP

NB

◆� 12

Note that there might be two junctions. Usually not desirable, but a possibility.

Page 9: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 9

Damage and annealing

The top surface of the semiconductor crystal (RP plus few ∆RP) will be heavily damaged. Probably becomes completely amorphous.

Damage can be healed by annealing. At high temperatures, the dislodged atoms can “diffuse” back into the correct lattice positions.

Annealing at 1000°C for 30 minutes is typically enough to restore crystallinity.

Page 10: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 10

Dopant diffusion during annealing

1E+14

1E+15

1E+16

1E+17

1E+18

1E+19

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.41E+14

1E+15

1E+16

1E+17

1E+18

1E+19

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

Of course, during the anneal, dopant will diffuse.

Before anneal After anneal

We lose some of the advantages of the ion implant.

Page 11: Ion Implantation - tuttle.merc.iastate.edututtle.merc.iastate.edu/ee432/topics/doping/ion_implant.pdf · EE 432/532 ion implantation – 4 ion stopping nuclear – ion cores interact

EE 432/532 ion implantation – 11

1E+14

1E+15

1E+16

1E+17

1E+18

1E+19

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

Accounting for diffusion

N (x) =

Qp2⇡�RP

exp

"� (x�RP )

2

2 (�RP )2

#

N (x) =

Q

2

p⇡Dt

exp

"� (x�RP )

2

4Dt

#

implant

diffusion

Treat the implant like it was a diffusion with (Dt)imp =(�RP )

2

2

Add the Dt’s, as we’ve discussed with diffusions

N (x) =

Q

2

r⇡

h(�RP )2

2 +Dt

i exp

0

@� (x�RP )2

4

h(�RP )2

2 +Dt

i

1

A