impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

29
IMPACT OF ADVERTISEMENT ON BRAND & REVENUE A CASE STUDY ON SUBMITTED TO CONTENTS

Transcript of impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Page 1: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

IMPACT OF ADVERTISEMENT ON BRAND & REVENUE

A

CASE STUDY ON

SUBMITTED TO

CONTENTS

1. Introduction

Page 2: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

2. About Airtel

3. Positioning Of Airtel Through Celebrity Endorsement

4. Effect of Advertising Expenditure On Sales

5. Questionnaire

6. Questionnaire Survey Findings

7. Conclusion

INTRODUCTION

Brands all over the world use celebrities to advertise their products. As early as 1890, actress Sarah Bernhardt appeared on posters for La Diaphane, a famous brand of rice powder at the time (Lehu, 1993). The use of celebrities in advertising is not, therefore, a new phenomenon, but it has become increasingly widespread. Brands like Pepsi have featured stars such as

Page 3: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Michael Jackson, Madonna, or even the Spice Girls, with varying impact (Erdogan,1999). Pizza Hut launched its restaurants on the international market with icons that are almost universally recognized, such as Cindy Crawford, Linda Evangelista, and Pamela Anderson. Some stars have several contracts with different brands: it is estimated that Michael Jordan, who appears in advertisements for Nike, Coke, Wheaties, Mc Donald's, Hanes, Oakley, and Gatorade, has an impact worth about 14 billion dollars on the American economy (Erdogan & al., 2001). Similarly, in a single week, French footballer Zinedine Zidane appeared on posters for Dior perfume and Leader Price hard-discount supermarkets, as well as TV ads for Dannon yoghurt. Stars have become a vital component of advertising for certain categories of products, like perfume and cosmetics.

While celebrity endorsement in advertising is not a new phenomenon, it has certainly become much more widespread over the past twenty years. It has even become common practice for some companies. In fact, consumers have become increasingly keen on celebrities (Masse-Stamberger, 2005): they are interested in people who are well-known simply due to the fact they have appeared on television, — like the stars of reality shows —, and celebrity magazines are tremendously popular, as people always want to know more about stars' lives. The number of celebrities in advertising increased by 60 % between 2000 and 2004 (Neumann, 2006). As a result, in 2004, nearly 700 television advertisements featured celebrities.

Alongside this phenomenon, research into the role of celebrities in advertising has also increased since the 1990s (Pringle and Binet, 2005; Erdogan, 1999; Ohanian, 1991). This research more specifically investigates the concept of congruency between celebrity and brand, which is apparently a crucial factor. We shall start by defining terms such as "celebrity” and "endorsement" and presenting the main models in this field then introduce a two-dimensional analysis of congruency. We shall attempt to define this concept and its antecedents in more detail. We shall then propose a scale for measuring perceived congruency between celebrities and brands.

We must first define what we mean by celebrity endorsements in advertising.

Firstly, we consider advertising according to an extremely broad definition, in agreement with Pringle and Binet: "Everything that has a name on it is advertising". This definition corresponds to consumer perception of advertising. It covers media advertising, as well as sales promotion, sponsoring, direct marketing, etc. As consumers do not generally make any

Page 4: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

distinction among these forms of communication (Ford-Hutchinson and Rothwell, 2002), it was appropriate to adopt this premise in our study, as we are examining the issue from a consumer standpoint. 

The term "celebrity" needs to be defined: according to the "Encyclopédie de l’Agora", "celebrity is measured by the number of press cuttings and broadcast time devoted to a person and is thus distinguished from fame, which is generated by a person's outstanding work or exemplary life. Of course, a celebrity may be worthy of fame, as was the case of Lindbergh, but the connection is accidental - celebrity has nothing to do with merit, it is simply the result of the media attention given to an act or person".

According to Glamour Speakers, a Paris communication agency specialized in consulting on the choice of celebrities, "a celebrity is a person whose name, face, and voice are spontaneously recognized by a proportion of the general public (…) and who is immediately associated with a set of values". This definition corresponds to "classic" celebrity types, like actors, models, sports personalities, and rock stars … These people maintain their "celebrity" by appearances in mass media, such as fashion magazines and tabloids, that inform the public about their private lives. 

Endorsement (sometimes known as Celebrity Marketing) is a phenomenon where celebrities lend their image to brands.

Several researchers have attempted to define endorsement over the last twenty years (see Erdogan, 1999). We will use McCracken's definition (1989, p.310): "the celebrity endorser is defined as any individual who enjoys public recognition and who uses this recognition on behalf of a consumer good  by appearing with it in an advertisement ». 

Celebrity endorsements: a major phenomenon

The fees received by celebrities for brand endorsements are very high: American actors Nicole Kidmann and Brad Pitt, as well as golfer Tiger Woods, may receive almost 5 million dollars per contract. In Europe, Zinedine Zidane refuses all proposals below 1.2 million dollars. Yannick Noah, who recently replaced the footballer as the French public's favorite personality, received 1,100,000 dollars (exclusive of commission on sales) for the new Sloggi underwear campaign.  

Research has attempted to elucidate the reasons why companies invest so much money in communication featuring celebrities (Erdogan, Baket and Tagg, 2001). There are many reasons (Lehu, 1993), but firstly, it is significant that celebrity endorsements are a way of avoiding anonymity and standing out from the competition in saturated markets. For example, in the cosmetic and perfume industry, new products are being launched all the time.

Page 5: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Cosmetic brands can no longer achieve recognition merely due to the intrinsic quality of their products, but do so, above all, by the image they project through their advertising campaigns, generally by featuring movie stars, models, or singers. Celebrities make an impression on consumers. According to Jacques Helleu, artistic director for Channel, "it is the only way of making a sufficiently strong impression on consumers memories to trigger a purchase when they are in a sales outlet at a later date" (Devilliers, 2004).

Beyond this objective of differentiation, it also gives brands an opportunity to focus their positioning in consumers' minds. Another interesting example is that of Madrange, a French SME specialized in ham (Maudieu, 2004): recruiting famous actresses, like Véronique Jeannot in 1988, and, particularly, Véronique Genest and Sophie Duez, enabled this brand to develop awareness and a quality image, thus moving up to second position in this market, behind Fleury Michon.

Sometimes, celebrity endorsements also give a brand considerable exposure in the press, who are more likely to report on events concerning the brand if the celebrities are present (e.g. brand promotion parties; Erdogan and al., 2001).

The impact on sales is more difficult to assess. In 1998, Fortune magazine estimated Michael Jordan's impact on the American economy and, particularly, on brands like Nike and Disney, at 14 billion dollars. Recent advertising campaigns for Sloggi, featuring Yannick Noah, led to a 47% increase in the brand's sales on the men's and 5% on the women's market over the past 10 months, which is an excellent result in a declining market (Neumann, 2006). The results of celebrity endorsements are, however, highly variable, as there are many factors involved, including the choice of celebrity, and the quality of the advertising itself, as well as the media programme, or even press relations. 

This is why it is interesting to understand how endorsement works and identify the decisive factors for its effectiveness. From this perspective, we shall present the main models devised to explain the type of relationship that develops between celebrities and consumers. These models are essential to our understanding of the influence of celebrity on brand perception. 

The source attractiveness model

The attractiveness model assumes that the effectiveness of the message depends on the physical characteristics of the source. A celebrity spokesperson's physical attractiveness has a positive impact on brand recall, attitude towards the brand, and purchasing intent (Kahle and Homer, 1985). Here, the endorser's physical attractiveness is assumed to have an influence

Page 6: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

on the target's acceptance of the advertising, particularly due to the phenomenon of identification. The effectiveness of the message depends on the endorser's similarity, likeableness, and familiarity. While there is no doubt that a celebrity endorser may improve attitude towards advertising and a brand, its impact on purchasing behavior is less clear (Erdogan, 1999). Attractiveness of the source is not the only characteristic of a celebrity to take into account (Friedman and Friedman, 1979) and is mainly significant for brands related to physical appearance (Kamins, 1990). 

The source credibility model

The source credibility model was developed in the 1950s by Hovland and colleagues (Hovland and Weiss, 1951). According to this model, the effectiveness of a message depends on the perceived level of expertise and trustworthiness of an endorser (Ohanian, 1991).

Expertise refers to the extent to which the endorser is perceived as a valid source of information (Erdogan, 1999). It is a matter of determining whether the advertising target perceives the endorser as having a certain level of experience, knowledge, and know-how that makes their recommendation of a product and/or brand credible. Erdogan's review of previous literature (1999) indicated that a source perceived as highly credible is more effective and persuasive than a less credible one, as well as inducing a more positive change of attitude towards the brand or product and more changes in behavior.

Trustworthiness refers to the endorser's honesty, credibility, and integrity, as perceived by the target. It is a matter of determining whether the consumer trusts the source for the honest, objective way the information is presented (Ohanian, 1991).

Ohanian (1990) developed a three-dimensional scale for assessing a celebrity’s credibility. The three dimensions in this credibility scale are attractiveness, trustworthiness, and expertise. However, as McCracken (1989) and Erdogan (1999) noted, limiting the assessment of an individual to certain dimensions may seem rather restrictive. 

These models may seem attractive but they have been criticized on several levels (Erdogan, 1999, Bower and Landreth, 2001). They do not properly take into account the multifunctional aspect of certain characteristics of the source and there is no proof that the dimensions examined are the correct ones. However, above all, these models seem incomplete as they do not consider all the significance and perceptions connected to a particular celebrity, merely focusing on certain characteristics of the endorser, so we do not feel they are capable of capturing what a person, as a whole, is capable of contributing to an advertisement. We think that McCracken's meaning transfer model (1989), which includes all the cultural connotations

Page 7: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

of celebrity, is more suitable, as it explains the endorsement process as a whole. 

McCracken's meaning transfer model (1989)

This model has the advantage of including affective and cognitive aspects. The transfer theory relies on the endorsement process described by McCracken (1989). This process is based on the idea that, in the consumer society, which is organized around culture, celebrities have a shared cultural significance in the eyes of consumers (McCracken, 1986, 1989). McCracken defines this transfer as the translation of the meaning of celebrity to a product or brand, e.g. in advertisements with celebrity spokespersons. Endorsement is effective when an individual who buys and consumes the product appropriates the meaning associated with the celebrity, which has been transferred to the product.  

About Bharti Airtel Limited

Bharti Airtel Limited, a group company of Bharti Enterprises, is India's leading integrated telecom services provider with an aggregate of 50 million customers. Bharti Airtel has been rated among the best performing companies in the world in the Business Week IT 100 list 2007.

Bharti Airtel is structured into three strategic business units - Mobile services, Broadband & Telephone (B&T) services and Enterprise services. The mobile business provides mobile & fixed wireless services using GSM technology across 23 telecom circles. The B&T business provides broadband & telephone services in 94 cities. The Enterprise services provide end-to-end telecom solutions to corporate customers and national & international long distance services to carriers. All these services are provided under the Airtel brand. Airtel's high-speed optic fibre network currently spans over 53,000

Page 8: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

kms covering all the major cities in the country. The company has two international landing stations in Chennai that connects two submarine cable systems - i2i to Singapore and SEA-ME-WE-4 to Europe. For more information, visit www.bhartiairtel.in

Telecom giant Bharti Airtel is the flagship company of Bharti Enterprises. The Bharti Group, has a diverse business portfolio and has created global brands in the telecommunication sector. Bharti has recently forayed into retail business as Bharti Retail Pvt. Ltd. under a MoU with Wal-Mart for the cash & carry business. It has successfully launched an international venture with EL Rothschild Group to export fresh agri products exclusively to markets in Europe and USA and has launched Bharti AXA Life Insurance Company Ltd under a joint venture with AXA, world leader in financial protection and wealth management.

Airtel comes to you from Bharti Airtel Limited, India’s largest integrated and the first private telecom services provider with a footprint in all the 23 telecom circles. Bharti Airtel since its inception has been at the forefront of technology and has steered the course of the telecom sector in the country with its world class products and services. The businesses at Bharti Airtel have been structured into three individual strategic business units (SBU’s) - mobile services, broadband & telephone services (B&T) & enterprise services. The mobile business provides mobile & fixed wireless services using GSM technology across 23 telecom circles while the B&T business offers broadband & telephone services in 94 cities. The Enterprise services provide end-to-end telecom solutions to corporate customers and national & international long distance services to carriers. All these services are provided under the Airtel brand.

ORGANISATION STRUCTURE

Page 9: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel
Page 10: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel
Page 11: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

BHARTI AIRTEL Services & Product

Page 12: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

VOICE BASED

• Voice mail

• Dial a service

SMS BASED

• Info messages

• SMS Chat

• Email access via SMS

• Ringtones and Logo downloads

• Instant Messenger

GPRS

• Mobile office

• Content Portal

OTHERS

• MMS

• Fax & Data, CLIR, Prepaid Roaming,

• Itemized billing,

• Location based services

Business Model and Revenue Sources

Content and Data Downloads

• Offers Java games, logos, ring tones through their content portal

• Also in agreement with Yahoo India for basic content download

Page 13: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Advertising Campaigns

• Latest movie ring tones, wallpapers available at their content

Portal

• Hosting third party campaigns like Coke and Master Card

SMS Polls on TV

• Users can vote through SMS for polls organized by TV

Channels

• Revenue sharing agreements with TV channels

Prepaid Recharging

• Subscribers can recharge either at ATMs using their ATM cards

Or

• Direct debit facility with the subscriber’s bank account (SMS Based service)

OPERATORS – FIXED, CDMA AND GSM

FIXED LINE

• BSNL (state owned)

• MTNL (state owned)

• Bharti (Touchtel)

• Tata Telecom

• HFCL

• Shyam Telecom

WLL/CDMA

• BSNL

• MTNL

• Reliance

Page 14: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

• Shyam Telecom

• Tata Telecom

• HFCL

6 Operators

GSM

• Bharti

• BPL

• BSNL

• Hutch

• Idea

• MTNL

• Reliance

•Spice Telecom

8 Operators

WLL/CDMA

• BSNL

• MTNL

• Reliance

• Shyam Telecom

• Tata Telecom

• HFCL

6 Operators

Mobile Operators Subscriber Base – GSM

Page 15: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Bharti is the undisputed leader among GSM operators Bharti was the first mobile operator in India.

Positioning Of Airtel Through Celebrity Endorsement

Page 16: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

FROM 'TOUCH TOMORROW' TO 'LIVE EVERY MOMENT'

In late-2002, Bharti Cellular Ltd. (Bharti), India's largest cellular telephone company released a television commercial (TVC), which despite using the 'oft-repeated' celebrity endorsement route was unusual in terms of its celebrity selection. Instead of using the usual movie stars/sports celebrities, it chose one of the country's most successful music composers, A.R Rahman to promote its brand.

The campaign attracted considerable media attention because this was the first time Rahman had agreed to do a television commercial and also because, Rahman had been paid Rs 10 million for the campaign, a sum usually unheard of, for celebrity endorsers in India. The campaign received brickbats as well as bouquets in the media, both for the selection of Rahman and the TVC's execution.

However, Bharti claimed to have scored an ace in terms of getting Rahman to compose five exclusive symphonies downloadable as ring tones for Airtel users. The TVC was a part of the brand repositioning and restructuring efforts for Airtel, as part of which, Bharti changed the brand's tagline in early-2002 from 'Touch Tomorrow' to 'Live Every Moment.'

The company also decided to undertake a comprehensive brand building program for the company and chose the slogan 'Unlimited Freedom' for the same. Commenting on these changes, company sources said, "Airtel's brand identity and campaign will now have a new younger and international look and feel that builds on the earlier positioning."

Bharti's massive media expenditure plans were no surprise, considering the fact that it was the largest cellular telecom company in the country - reaching over 600 million people in 16 (out of 29) states of India. The company posted revenues of Rs 8.48 billion. The Airtel brand (and the pre-paid card service brand, Magic) had top-of-the-mind recall amongst cellular phone users and enjoyed a leadership position in most markets. Industry observers primarily attributed it to Bharti's strong brand building and positioning strategies.

CELEBRITY ENDOSREMENT

Forms of Celebrity:

As a spokesperson Multiple celebrities for one product

Page 17: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Multiple product for one celebrity Celebrity Pairing Endorsement in movies

WHEN DO COMPANIES INDUGLE IN CELEBRITIES ENDORSEMENT:

Close Substitutes Clear Differentiation Entry into the Market Lifecycle of the Brand Competition

Criteria for selecting a celebrity:

Celebrity-Product match

Celebrity- target audience

Cost

Celebrity credibility

Celebrity availability

Celebrity physical attractiveness

Why customers accept the celebrity endorsements:

High degree of attention and recall for consumers

Celebrity expertise perceived relevant

Celebrities are perceived trustworthy

Ambitious psyche

Physical Attraction

Benefits of Celebrity Endorsement:

Establishes credibility

Attracts attention

Page 18: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Associative benefit

Psychographic connect

Demographic connect

Mass appeal

Positive impact of Celebrity endorsement on the brand:

Sense of trust

Attention of the target group

Persuasive message

Demographic and psychographic

Public relation opportunities

Why Celebrity endorsements do not work sometimes:

Improper Positioning

Brand- Celebrity disconnect

Clutter Flutter

Dissatisfaction with product performance

Confusion/Skepticism

Television Commercials and its ratingsAirTel 'Express

Yourself ' commercial

Airtel 'Child in the Rain' commercial

Airtel 'Lifetime Incoming'

commercial

Airtel'Kuch bandhan atoot hote hain jaise'

commerical

Page 19: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Product Rating:(Read 16 reviews) (Read 1 review) (Read 1 review)

Product Recommendation: 88% 0% 100% 100%

  Remove

Camera Effects:

Concept:

Execution:

Model Choice:

Model Performance:

Jingle:

EFFECT OF ADVERTISING EXPENDITURE ON SALES

First advertisement Child in the rain

Airtel'Kuch bandhan atoot hote hain jaise'

Latest Advertisement

Page 20: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2006

Advertisement Expenditure to Sales & Marketing Expenditure

Advertisement Expenditure 3,357,372,000

Sales & Marketing Expenditure 6,442,162,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Sales & Marketing Expenditure

3357372000 *100

6,442,162,000

= 52.11%

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Expenditure

Advertisement Expenditure 3,357,372,000

Total Expenditure 43,110,365,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Expenditure

3357372000 *100

43,110,365,000

= 7.78%

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Income

Advertisement Expenditure 3,357,372,000

Total Income 81,557,845,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Income 3357372000

Page 21: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

*100

81,557,845,000

= 4.11%

ANALYSIS

The advertising expenditures are half of the total Sales and marketing expenditures, which indicates a sufficient spending on advertisingi.e: Advertising expenditure= 52% of Sales & marketing expenditures.

It also indicates that there is substantial Expenditure on advertising initiatives.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2007

Advertisement Expenditure to Sales & Marketing Expenditure

Advertisement Expenditure 4,113,547,000

Sales & Marketing Expenditure 8,335,924,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Sales & Marketing Expenditure

4113547000 * 100

8,335,924,000

= 49.34%

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Expenditure

Page 22: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Advertisement Expenditure 4,113,547,000

Total Expenditure 63,868,581,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Expenditure

4113547000 * 100

63,868,581,000

= 6.44%

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Income

Advertisement Expenditure 4,113,547,000

Total Income 117,255,093,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Income

4113547000 * 100

117,255,093,000

= 3.50%

ANALYSIS

In the year 2006, it shows that Advertising Expenses are 49% of the total Sales & Marketing, which indicates that they are reducing their focus on advertising by a few basis points.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2008

Page 23: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

Advertisement Expenditure to Sales & Marketing Expenditure

Advertisement Expenditure 4,308,349,000

Sales & Marketing Expenditure 11,387,037,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Sales & Marketing Expenditure

4308349000 * 100

11,387,037,000

= 37.83%

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Expenditure

Advertisement Expenditure 4,308,349,000

Total Expenditure 92,842,448,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Expenditure

4308349000 * 100

92,842,448,000

= 4.64%

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Income

Advertisement Expenditure 4,308,349,000

Total Income 184,202,022,000

Advertisement Expenditure to Total Income

4308349000 * 100

184,202,022,000

= 2.33%

Page 24: impact-of-advertisement-on-brand-airtel

ANALYSIS

In the year 2008, they have reduced their Advertisement Expenditure to Sales & Marketing Expenditure drastically by 24% on yearly basis.

From this we can also conclude rather than advertising Expenditure other factors like sales promotion etc. are contributing equally to the total revenues.

As Advertising Expenditure to Total Revenue is decreasing year by year, this indicates good brand development for the company.