Identification and characterization of a selective human...
Transcript of Identification and characterization of a selective human...
DMD # 82487
1
Identification and Characterization of a Selective Human Carbonyl Reductase 1 Substrate
Diane Ramsden, Dustin Smith, Raquel Arenas, Kosea Frederick, and Matthew A. Cerny
Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield,
Connecticut (DR, DS, RA, KF, MAC)
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
2
Running Title: Identification of a CBR1 Selective Substrate
Corresponding Author: Matthew A. Cerny
Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism
Pfizer, Inc.
Eastern Point Rd.
Groton, CT 06340
Telephone: (860) 441-0223
Fax: (860) 686-7629
Email: [email protected]
Number of text pages: 24
Number of Tables: 2
Number of figures: 6
Number of references: 34
Number of words in abstract: 232
Number of words in introduction: 572
Number of words in Discussion: 1194
ABBREVIATIONS
P450, cytochrome P450; CBR1, carbonyl reductase 1; CBR3; human carbonyl reductase 3;
CBR4, human carbonyl reductase 4; RAAS, renin-angiotensin aldosterone system; ACEi,
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; AKR, aldo-keto reductase; ARB, angiotensin receptor
blocker; CLint, intrinsic clearance; HLCyt, human liver cytosol; HLM, human liver micrsomes;
LC/MS/MS, liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry; LCyt, liver
cytosol; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NADPH, β-nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide phosphate reduced form; NADH, β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide reduced form;
IS, internal standard; SDR, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
3
ABSTRACT
During drug discovery efforts targeting inhibition of cytochrome P450 11B2 (CYP11B2)-
mediated production of aldosterone as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of chronic kidney
disease and hypertension, (S)-6-(5-fluoro-4-(1-hydroxyethyl)pyridin-3-yl)-3,4-dihydro-1,8-
naphthyridine-1(2H)-carboxamide (1) was identified as a potent and selective inhibitor of
CYP11B2. Pre-clinical studies characterized 1 as low clearance in both in vitro test systems and
in vivo in pre-clinical species. Despite low metabolic conversion, an active ketone metabolite (2),
was identified from in vitro metabolite identification studies. Due to the inhibitory activity of 2
against CYP11B2 as well as the potential for it to undergo reductive metabolism back to 1, the
formation and elimination of 2 were characterized and are the focus of this manuscript.
A series of in vitro investigations determined that 1 was slowly oxidized to 2 by P450 2D6, 3A4,
and 3A5, followed by stereoselective reduction back to 1 and not its enantiomer (3). Importantly,
reduction of 2 was mediated by an NADPH-dependent, cytosolic enzyme. Studies with human
cytosolic fractions from multiple tissues, selective inhibitors, and recombinantly expressed
enzymes indicated that carbonyl reductase 1 (CBR1) is responsible for this transformation in
humans. Carbonyl reduction is emerging as an important pathway for endogenous and
xenobiotic metabolism. With a lack of selective substrates and inhibitors to enable
characterization of the involvement of CBR1, 2 could be a useful probe to assess CBR1 activity
in vitro in both subcellular fractions and in cell-based systems.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
4
Introduction
The predominant mineralocorticoid, aldosterone, controls salt and water balance via binding to
the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). Aldosterone actions have also been proposed to occur via
other so-called non-genomic pathways (Funder, 2001; Boldyreff and Wehling, 2003; Vinson and
Coghlan, 2010; Dooley et al., 2012). Though the exact mechanism(s) is not currently understood,
elevated levels of aldosterone are associated with a number of diseases (i.e. chronic kidney
disease, hypertension, and obesity) (Hwang et al., 2013). The renin-angiotensin aldosterone
system (RAAS) has been the focus of much attention by the pharmaceutical industry and has
resulted in multiple drug classes which include direct renin inhibitors, angiotensin converting
enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and MR antagonists (MRAs).
Direct inhibition of the production of aldosterone offers a novel means of treating the diseases
indicated above and may have the additional benefit of decreasing the interaction of aldosterone
through both genomic and non-genomic pathways (Cerny, 2013; Hu et al., 2014; Brem and Gong,
2015; Oparil and Schmieder, 2015).
Drug discovery efforts (Cerny et al., 2015; Weldon et al., 2016) identified 1 ((S)-6-(5-fluoro-4-
(1-hydroxyethyl)pyridin-3-yl)-3,4-dihydro-1,8-naphthyridine-1(2H)-carboxamide, Figure 1) as a
potent inhibitor of aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2). Additionally, 1 only weakly inhibits the
highly similar enzyme, CYP11B1, as well as other steroidogenic and xenobiotic-metabolizing
cytochromes P450. While characterizing the ADME properties of 1, a ketone metabolite (2) was
identified in incubations with liver microsomes and hepatocytes as well as in recombinantly
expressed cytochrome P450 enzymes. Although the abundance of 2 was found to be relatively
low in these systems, additional in vitro characterization of the metabolism of 2 was undertaken
for the following reasons: 1) 2 was shown to have inhibitory properties towards CYP11B2
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
5
similar to that of 1, 2) reductive metabolism of 2 may result in generation of either 1 or its
enantiomer, 3 (Figure 1), therefore, requiring chiral chromatographic analyses of clinical samples,
and 3) reversible metabolism of 2 may contribute to the low clearance observed for 1. Based on
the results of the studies described herein, 2 was determined to be a selective substrate of human
carbonyl reductase 1 (CBR1).
Carbonyl reduction has emerged as an important non-P450 pathway which contributes to the
metabolism of both endogenous substrates and xenobiotics (Malatkova and Wsol, 2014; Cerny,
2016). These reactions can be catalyzed by the aldo-keto reductase (AKR) and carbonyl
reductase family of enzymes and often substrate overlap between these families of enzymes is
observed. NAD(P)(H)-dependent enzymes of both the aldo-keto reductase (AKR) and Short-
chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) families of enzymes have been shown to carry out these
reactions. Carbonyl reductases (CBRs, EC. 1.1.1.184) represent a subfamily of SDR enzymes
that includes three isoforms in humans, CBR1, CBR3, and CBR4. While CBR1 and CBR3 are
both cytosolic enzymes, CBR4 is found in the mitochondria. CBR3 and CBR4 have been shown
to have low carbonyl reducing activity or narrow substrate specificity. In contrast, CBR1 has
been shown to be the most important enzyme of carbonyl reducing enzymes as it is involved in
the metabolism of multiple clinically important drugs, including doxorubicin, daunorubicin,
nabumetone, loxoprofen, haloperidol, pentoxifylline, and bupropion (Rosemond and Walsh,
2004). Despite the recognition that this pathway is important to metabolism of carbonyl
containing compounds, there is still a paucity of data in the literature and further research is
needed. Identification of 2 as a selective substrate for CBR1 may serve as a useful probe for
further study of this enzyme and its involvement in the metabolism of drugs and endogenous
substances.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
6
Materials and Methods
Reagents β-Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate reduced (NADPH), β-nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide, reduced disodium salt hydrate (NADH), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO),
acetonitrile (MeCN), phenobarbital, zopolrestat, phenolphthalein, flufenamic acid,
chenodeoxycholic acid, medroxyprogesterone 17-acetate, dexamethasone, indomethacin,
menadione, quercetin ethacrynic acid, dicumarol, 4-methyl pyrazole, disulfiram were purchased
from MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO). Compounds 1-5 were from the Boehringer Ingelheim
compound collection and were prepared by published methods (Balestra et al., 2014). Pooled
liver microsomes from mixed gender human (HLM), pooled cynomolgus male monkey (MkLM),
pooled male beagle dog (DLM), and pooled male Wistar Han rat (RLM) were purchased from
Corning (Tewksbury, MA). Pooled mixed gender human,cynomolgus male monkey, male
beagle dog, and male Wistar Han rat liver, kidney, and lung cytosolic fractions were purchased
from Corning (Tewksbury, MA). Pooled human, male cynomolgus monkey, male beagle dog,
and male Wistar Han rat suspension hepatocytes were obtained from Bioreclamation IVT
(Baltimore,MD). Recombinant human carbonyl reductase 1 (CBR1), carbonyl reductase 3
(CBR3), and carbonyl reductase 4 (CBR4) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA).
Metabolite identification studies in liver microsomes Compound 1 (10 µM) was incubated
with human, monkey, dog, and rat liver microsomes (LM) at a 1 mg/mL final protein
concentration in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h at 37 °C in a total volume of 1 mL
using either NADPH or NADH (1 mM) as cofactor. Additional metabolite identification studies
were carried out on 2 (10 µM) in both HLM and human liver cytosol (HLCyt) as described
above for 1. Incubations were halted by addition of cold MeCN (1 mL) followed by thorough
vortexing and removal of precipitate protein by centrifugation (10 min at 3000xg). Supernatants
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
7
were removed and concentrated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen. The resulting material
was then reconstituted in starting mobile phase and analyzed by LC/MS/MS as described below.
Metabolite identification studies using hepatocytes Compounds 1 (10 µM) was incubated
with hepatocytes (final concentration 2 million cells/mL) in Williams E media for 4 h at 37 °C in
a total volume of 0.5 mL. Incubations were halted by addition of cold MeCN (1 mL) followed
by thorough vortexing and removal of precipitate protein by centrifugation (10 min at 3000xg).
Supernatants were removed and concentrated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen. The
resulting material was then reconstituted in starting mobile phase and analyzed by LC/MS/MS as
described below.
Reaction phenotyping studies Individual recombinant cytochrome P450 isoforms (rCYPs,
50 pmol/mL final concentration) were incubated with 1 (1 µM) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer
(pH 7.4) containing magnesium chloride (3 mM final concentration) at 37 °C. Incubation were
started by addition of NADPH (1 mM final concentration) bringing the total volume to 0.4 mL.
Aliquots (50 μL) were removed at 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min and added to cold MeCN (150 μL)
containing internal standard. Quenched samples were submitted to thorough vortexing and
removal of precipitate protein by centrifugation (10 min at 3000xg). Supernatants were removed
and concentrated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen. The resulting material was then
reconstituted in starting mobile phase and analyzed by LC/MS/MS as described below.
Kinetics assessment of ketone reduction Formation of 1 from 2 was assessed in triplicate
incubations in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing varying concentrations of 2
(12 concentrations between 0 – 100 for LCyt and HLM or 0 – 500 μM for CBR1, CBR3, and
CBR4), cytosolic or microsomal fractions (1 mg/mL final protein concentration) from human or
other pre-clinical species or recombinant CBR1, CBR3, or CBR4 (0.01 mg/mL final protein
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
8
concentration), and NADPH (1 mM final concentration) at a final volume of 0.12 mL. For
specified experiments NADPH was replaced with NADH (1 mM final concentration). For all
experiments, incubations were preincubated for 5 min and started by addition of cofactor. After
5 min, the incubations were quenched by addition of MeCN (0.12 mL) containing internal
standard (IS). Precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation (5 min at 3000xg). Samples
were analyzed by LC/MS/MS as indicated below.
Substrate depletion in cytosolic fractions across species Parent disappearance experiments
were conducted in triplicate (human) or quadruplicate (monkey, dog, or rat) essentially as
described above. For these experiments a single 1 μM concentration of 2 was used as substrate
and incubations were terminated as above at 0, 5, 15, 30, and 60 min. Precipitated proteins were
removed by centrifugation (10 min at 3000xg). Samples were analyzed by LC/MS/MS as
indicated below.
Inhibition of the reduction of 2 to 1 in human liver cytosol The effect of reductase inhibitors
was assessed by incubation of 2 (15 μM) with HLCyt (1 mg/mL), 0.1 M potassium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4), and NADPH in the presence of 10 or 100 μM of the following inhibitors:
phenobarbital, zopolrestat, phenolphthalein, flufenamic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid,
medroxyprogesterone 17-acetate, dexamethasone, indomethacin, menadione, quercetin,
ethacrynic acid, dicumarol, 4-methyl pyrazole, and disulfiram. Incubations were started by
addition of NADPH and warmed at 37 °C for 5 min. Incubations were quenched by addition of
MeCN containing internal standard. Samples were analyzed by LC/MS/MS as indicated below.
LC/MS/MS Analyses
Metabolite identification Samples (20 µL) were injected on a Supelco Discovery C18 5µ 2.1 x
150 mm column maintained at room temperature using a Thermo Accela High Speed LC system.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
9
A solvent system consisting of water with 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile
with 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase B) was used at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min was used with the
following gradient: 0 – 5 min 15% B, 5 – 10 min 15 – 52.5% B, 15 – 16 min 52.5 – 85% B
maintain 85% B for 2 min, 18 – 19 min 15% B then equilibrated for 3 min. The column eluent
was analyzed by MS on a Thermo LTQ OrbiTrap XL Mass Spectrometer run in positive mode
using FTMS and data-dependent FT MS/MS scans (CID and HCD) to elucidate metabolite
structures. An in-line Accela photodiode array detector (Thermo Scientific) obtained
simultaneous UV absorption spectra. The resulting data were analyzed using Xcalibur 3.0 and
Thermo Metworks 1.3 software.
Analysis of kinetics study samples Samples (5 µL) were injected on a Phenomenex Kinetex
C18 1.7 µm, 2.1 x 50 mm column maintained at 40 °C using a Waters Acquity I-Class UPLC
System. A solvent system consisting of water with 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase A) and
acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase B) was used at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min was
used with the following gradient: 0 – 0.50 min 10% B, 0.50 – 1.50 min 10 – 90% B, 1.50 – 2.00
min maintain at 90% B, 2.00 – 2.01 90– 10% B, 2.01 – 2.50 reequilibrate at 10% B. The column
eluent was analyzed by MS on an AB Sciex API 6500 Q-Trap Mass Spectrometer run in positive
mode using the following MRM method: for 1 Q1/Q3 317.2 → 254, DP 60, CE 25, for 2 Q1/Q3
315.1 → 252, DP 60, CE 25. A standard curve was constructed by serial dilution in control
tissue sample ranging from 10 – 0.001 M. The resulting MS data were analyzed using Analyst
1.4.2 software.
Chiral chromatography of 1 and 3 Samples (5 µL) were injected on a Chiral-AGP 2.0x100
mm column maintained at room temperature using a Waters Acquity I-Class UPLC System. A
solvent system consisting of water (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile (mobile phase B) was used
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
10
at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min was used with an isocratic flow of 95% A and 5% B. The column
eluent was analyzed by MS on an AB Sciex API 6500 Q-Trap Mass Spectrometer run in positive
mode using the following MRM method: for both 1 and 3 Q1/Q3 317.2 → 254, DP 60, CE 25.
The resulting MS data were analyzed using Analyst 1.4.2 software.
Calculations
Kinetics assessment of ketone reduction: The rate of formation of 1 from 2 was plotted against
the nominal incubation concentrations of 2 and fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation using
GraphPad Prism 7.02 to determine the kinetics parameters, Km and Vmax. Given the low
lipophilicity of 2, (LogP = 1.7) non-specific binding to microsomes is expected to be low. In
vitro intrinsic clearance (Clint) was calculated from these parameters using Equation 1.
Equation 1 𝐶𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑡 = 𝑉𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝐾𝑚
Substrate depletion in cytosolic fractions across species: The natural log of percent substrate
remaining was plotted versus time in order to determine the rate of depletion (kdeg). From these
data Clint was calculated as described in Equation 2 below.
Equation 2 𝐶𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑡 = 𝑘𝑑𝑒𝑔 x 𝑚𝐿 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑢𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
1 mg cytosolic protein
Results
Metabolite Identification
Metabolism studies on 1 were carried out across species in a number of in vitro systems
including LM, hepatocytes, and rCYPs. In incubations of LM with 1 performed in the absence
of NADPH neither consumption of 1, nor formation of metabolites was observed. Generally,
greater consumption of 1 was observed in LM than in hepatocytes across species (Supplemental
Table S1 and Table S2). However, in both human LM and hepatocytes, low turnover (<5 %
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
11
consumed in 60 min, Supplemental Figure S1) was observed for 1. Greater consumption of 1
and formation of metabolites was observed in monkey, dog, and rat LM and hepatocytes than in
human. In samples from these incubations 1 was shown to elute at 10.8 min with prominent
fragmentation occurring through the urea moiety (Figure 2) yielding fragments of m/z 300 and
274.
As shown in Figure 3, three monooxygenated metabolites (m/z 333) of 1 were observed. As the
prominent fragmentation for these metabolites occurs via the urea moiety, similarly to what was
described above for 1, little structural information as to position of metabolism was ascertained
from MS2 data. The identity of one of these three metabolites (tR = 9.2 min) was determined to
be the pyridine N-oxide (4) based on a synthetic standard. The site of metabolism for a second
m/z 333 metabolite (m332_2, tR = 9.8 min) was identified as on the methylene adjacent to the
urea nitrogen. This was established using a deuterated analog of 1 (5) where metabolism of 5
resulted in loss of one of the two deuterium atoms (m/z 334) and could result in formation of the
ring-intact hydroxyl species and/or the ring-opened aldehyde metabolite. The structure of the
third m/z 333 (m332_3, tR = 10.5 min) metabolite was not determined. Subsequent reduction and
oxidation of the aldehyde form of m332_2 gave rise to both the m/z 335 (m334, tR = 8.0 min) and
m/z 349 (m348, tR = 8.5 min) metabolites, respectively, which are only observed in hepatocytes.
The structure of both of these metabolites was confirmed with synthetic standards.
Another minor metabolite with m/z 315 (tR = 12.9 min, -2H) was identified in a number of
matrices. The structure of this metabolite was confirmed with a synthetic standard of 2 which
matched the chromatographic retention and mass spectrometric fragmentation pattern of the
m/z 315 metabolite (data not shown). Follow-up studies determined 2 to be a potent and
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
12
selective inhibitor of CYP11B2 (CYP11B2 IC50 = 9.7 nM, CYP11B1 IC50 = 6200 nM) using
cynomolgus monkey adrenal homogenate assays (Cerny et al., 2015).
Metabolites observed in monkey, dog, and rat LM and hepatocytes corresponded to the
metabolites observed in human matrices. No human unique metabolites were observed, and no
additional metabolites were detected in pre-clinical species LM and hepatocytes. Metabolism of
1 in rCYPs resulted in formation of only oxidative metabolites (4, m332_2, m332_3, and 2) with
CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 contributing to the
metabolism of 1 (Supplemental Table S3).
Additional metabolite identification studies were carried out on 2 in both HLM and HLCytLCyt.
In these studies, 2 was also found to be relatively stable in HLM and HLCyt incubations
supplemented with NADH (<10% consumed in 60 min). The major metabolite observed in these
studies was reduction of 2 to a metabolite consistent with the enantiomers, 1 or 3, in terms of
mass, retention time, and fragmentation pattern and represents 2.2 and 5.1% of the total UV peak
area, respectively (Supplemental Table S4). When 2 was incubated with HLM and NADPH,
formation of a metabolite consistent with 1 or 3 was also the major biotransformation,
represented ~45% of the UV peak area. A minor monohydroxylated metabolite of 2 with
m/z 331 (0.6% of UV peak area) was also observed under these conditions as well as three other
minor metabolites which were only detectable by MS. Incubation of 2 with HLCyt and NADPH
resulted in significant formation of a metabolite consistent with 1 or 3 which represented almost
99% of the total UV peak area.
Determination of Stereoselectivity of the Reduction of 2
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
13
As reduction of 2 may result in formation of either 1 and/or 3, chiral chromatography was
developed to determine the stereoselectivity of this reduction. Chromatographic resolution of 1
from 3 was achieved as shown in Figure 4A and Figure 4B, respectively. Subsequently, analysis
of a sample of the HLCyt incubation of 2 supplemented with NADPH resulted in a single peak
with a retention time that matched 1 (Figure 4C). Spiking of this sample with 3, followed by
chromatographic analysis resulted in two peaks, an earlier eluting peak corresponding to 3 which
was not present in the incubation sample and the previously observed peak which corresponds to
1 (Figure 4D). This analysis indicated that reductive metabolism of 2 occurs stereoselectively
resulting in conversion of 2 back to 1 with no or minimal formation of 3.
Kinetics Studies
To further characterize the reduction of 2 to 1, kinetic studies were carried out in human
cytosolic fractions from multiple tissues as well as HLM and recombinant CBR1, CBR3 and
CBR4. Initial incubations were run with both NADH and NADPH to determine the optimal
cofactor for supporting this reductive transformation. As the determined solubility of 2 at
physiological pH was ~100 μM, data generated at concentrations exceeding this limit were
excluded from kinetics assessments. Kinetics of reductive metabolism of 1 followed Michalis-
Menten kinetics and generally similar Km values were observed across all matrices (Table 1). In
both HLCyt and HLM, NADPH fortified incubations displayed higher Clint for the reductive
metabolism of 2 (Table 1, Figure 5). Formation of 1 from 2 was observed in NADPH-fortified
incubations of either CBR3 or CBR4 only at high concentrations (Supplemental Figure 2). A
comparison of the NADPH-supported reduction of 2 in cytosolic fractions across human tissues
in terms of Clint resulted in a rank order of activity as follows: intestine > liver > lung ≈ kidney
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
14
(Table 1). Figure 6 shows Clint data determined by disappearance of 2 (1 μM) in NADPH-
fortified cytosolic fractions from liver, intestine, kidney, and lung from human, cynomolgus
monkey, dog, and rat. In general, cynomolgus monkey and dog exhibited similar activity to that
of human across tissues. However, rat displayed significantly less activity across all matrices.
Enzyme Identification Studies
Currently highly selective inhibitors for most carbonyl reducing enzymes are not available.
Therefore, identifying the enzyme(s) responsible for the conversion of 2 to 1 was undertaken
using a set of inhibitors which are known to inhibit one or more carbonyl reducing enzymes.
Inhibition of the conversion of 2 to 1 was determined using HLCyt supplemented with NADPH.
Inhibition as a percent of control was determined at 10 and 100 μM inhibitor concentrations for
the inhibitors listed in Table 3. At the 10 μM inhibitor concentration, <20% inhibition was
observed for all inhibitors except for menadione and quercetin which inhibited 32.6 and 56.4%,
respectively. At the 100 μM inhibitor concentration, menadione, quercetin, ethacrynic acid, and
disulfiram showed 95.7, 81.6, 34.4, and 43.5 % inhibition, respectively. Based on the reported
inhibition of carbonyl reducing enzymes, these results indicate the involvement of a carbonyl
reductase (CBR) or a member of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR).
Discussion
The identification of 1 as a potent and selective inhibitor of aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2)
lead to characterization of its ADME in both in vitro systems and in vivo in pre-clinical species.
In these systems, 1 was characterized as a low clearance compound (< 2.5 mL/min/kg, data not
included). Though 1 was found to be metabolically stable, sufficient turnover of 1 was observed
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
15
to allow for the identification of metabolites, as shown in Figure 2. In rCYPs, human LM, and
human hepatocytes three monooxidation metabolites were observed with m/z 333. One of these
metabolites was confirmed to be the pyridine N-oxide metabolite (4). Another of these
metabolites was determined to be hydroxylated on the methylene adjacent to the urea using the
deuterated analog 5, resulting in the ring-intact hydroxyl species and/or the ring-opened aldehyde
metabolite. Subsequent reduction and oxidation of the aldehyde form of this metabolite likely
gives rise to both the m/z 334 and m/z 348 metabolites, respectively. As formation of these
metabolites likely requires cytosolic alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases, respectively, these
metabolites are only observed in incubations of 1 with hepatocytes. The specific position of the
third monooxidation metabolite was not determined. A minor ketone metabolite, 2 (<1% of
parent based on UV in HLM and hepatocytes), was confirmed by synthesis of an authentic
standard. Subsequently, 2 was shown to possess inhibitory activity against CYP11B2 and a high
degree of selectivity relative to CYP11B1. Due to its activity against the pharmacological target
as well as potential for reversible metabolism contributing to the low clearance of 1, studies to
determine enzymes responsible for the formation and subsequent metabolism of this ketone
metabolite were undertaken.
As both NADH and NADPH are capable of supporting reductive metabolism depending on the
enzyme(s) involved (Rosemond and Walsh, 2004), we initially sought to determine the optimal
cofactor and matrix for reduction of 2 to 1 in HLM and HLCyt. In HLMs both oxidative
metabolism and reduction of 2 to 1 were shown to be minor. However, 2 was found to be
metabolized rapidly via reduction in HLCyt supplemented with NADPH. Analysis of samples of
the cytosolic incubation indicated that the reduction of 2 occurred stereoselectively back to 1 and
not to its enantiomer, 3 (Figure 4). Such stereoselectivity for carbonyl reduction is not without
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
16
precedent and has been reported for ketotifen (Breyer-Pfaff and Nill, 2000), nortriptyline
(Breyer-Pfaff and Nill, 2000), and dolasetron (Breyer-Pfaff and Nill, 2004). Furthermore, the
reduction of 2 to 1 in human cytosol fractions across a number of tissues (Supplemental Table S4,
Figure 5) was supported predominantly by NADPH with considerably less reductase activity
observed in the presence of NADH.
The NADPH-catalyzed reduction of 2 to 1 exhibited comparable Km values across tissues and in
recombinant CBR1 (Table 1) though Vmax values varied considerably across tissues. In terms of
Clint, the cytosolic reduction activity was found to increase in rate across human tissues (Table 1)
in the following order: intestine >liver > kidney ≈ lung. However, some caution must be taken
in the determined kinetic parameters (i.e. Km, Vmax, and CLint), as the reported Km values in most
matrices are approaching the solubility limit of 1.
Akin to human, reduction of 2 was also observed in cytosolic fractions from other pre-clinical
species. Similar reductive activities were observed across tissues in human, monkey, and dog.
However, reductive metabolism across tissues from rat was considerably slower than in human
tissues. These observations are consistent with known differences in the function and expression
of CBR1 across pre-clinical species and human. These differences have been described in a
recent publication which evaluated the tissue distribution of CBR1 across pre-clinical species
and reported that 1) cbr1 is not expressed in rat liver, 2) cbr1 demonstrates greater specificity in
steroid reduction, and 3) cbr1 is highly expressed in reproductive tissues (Shi and Di, 2017).
To provide insights into the enzyme(s) responsible for the reduction of 2, a set of inhibition
studies was undertaken. As selective inhibitors for many of the carbonyl reductase enzymes
have not been identified, a set of inhibitors targeting one or more reductase enzymes was
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
17
employed at 10 and 100 μM concentrations. The set of inhibitors is presented in Table 2 and
included: phenobarbital (AKR1A1, AKR1B1), zopolrestat (AKR1B1), phenolphthalein
(AKR1C1, AKR1C2, AKR1C3, AKR1C4), flufenamic acid (AKR1C1, AKR1C2, AKR1C3,
AKR1C4), chenodeoxycholic acid (AKR1C2), medroxyprogesterone 17-acetate (AKR1C1,
AKR1C2, AKR1C4), dexamethasone (AKR1C4), indomethacin (AKR1C1, AKR1C2, AKR1C3,
AKR1C4, CR), menadione (CR/SDR), quercetin (CR/SDR), ethacrynic acid (CR/SDR),
dicumarol (quinone oxidoredutase), 4-methyl pyrazole (alcohol dehydrogenase), and disulfiram
(aldehyde dehydrogenase). As shown in Table 2, significant inhibition was observed for
menadione (96% inhibition), quercetin (82% inhibition), disulfiram (44% inhibition), and
ethacrynic acid (34% inhibition) at a 100 μM inhibitor concentration. Likewise, both quercetin
and menadione also showed significant inhibition at a 10 μM inhibitor concentration. Inhibition
by menadione, quercetin, and ethacrynic acid indicate that a CR/SDR enzyme such as CBR1 is
responsible for the reduction of 2. This is further supported by the location of the reductase in
the cytosolic fraction and the greater rate of metabolism with incubations supplemented with
NADPH rather than NADH. Inhibition of reduction of 2 by the aldehyde dehydrogenase
inhibitor, disulfiram, can be explained by a lack of selectivity for this inhibitor at higher
concentrations. Additionally, disulfiram has been previously shown to inhibit two carbonyl
reductases isolated from rat ovaries (Iwata et al., 1992).
Data obtained from inhibition studies, the greater activity observed in the presence of NADPH
versus NADH, studies with recombinant CBR1, as well the majority of reductase activity being
observed in the cytosolic fraction together indicate that CBR1 is the enzyme responsible for this
transformation in humans and that the reduction reaction is selective for CBR1. The reductive
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
18
activity towards 2 observed across human tissues also appears to be in agreement to the protein
expression profile of CBR1 reported by Hua et al. (Hua et al., 2017).
Though many compounds have been identified as substrates for CBR1, the selectivity of most
towards other carbonyl reducing enzymes and cytochromes P450 are generally poor.
Additionally, many of the probe substrates are small, low molecular weight compounds with
limited utility for MS detection. The selective reduction 2 by CBR1, the relatively slow
oxidation of 1 to 2 by CYP enzymes, the lack of inhibitory potency of 2 against CYP enzymes
(other than CYP11B2), and the favorable MS characteristics for this compound make 2 a useful
probe substrate to assess CBR1 activity in vitro in both subcellular factions and in cell-bases
systems.
In addition to the identification of a potentially useful probe of CBR1, the in vitro
characterization of the metabolic interconversion of 1 and 2 alleviated concerns regarding
inhibitory potency of 2 towards CYP11B2, the stereoselectivity of the reductive metabolism of 2,
and the contribution of reversible metabolism of 2 contributing to the low clearance of 1. In
vitro studies indicated that serendipitously conversion of 2 occurred back to 1. The rate of back
reduction of 2 to 1 is anticipated to result in insignificant circulating levels of 2 contributing to
the pharmacology. Additionally, the minimal formation of 2 in systems lacking CBR1 suggests
that oxidative metabolism of 1 is slow and indicates that reversible metabolism involving 2 is
likely minimal.
Acknowledgements
We thank Xin Guo, Kenneth Meyers, Bryan McKibben, and John Lord for their synthesis of
compounds 1 – 5.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
19
Authorship Contributions
Participated in research design: Arenas, Frederick and Cerny
Conducted Experiments: Arenas and Frederick
Performed data analysis: Arenas, Frederick, and Cerny
Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Smith, Ramsden, Frederick, and Cerny
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
20
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
21
References
Atalla A, Breyer-Pfaff U, and Maser E (2000) Purification and characterization of
oxidoreductases-catalyzing carbonyl reduction of the tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-
methylnitrosamino-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in human liver cytosol. Xenobiotica
30:755-769.
Atalla A and Maser E (2001) Characterization of enzymes participating in carbonyl reduction of
4-methylnitrosamino-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in human placenta. Chem Biol
Interact 130-132:737-748.
Balestra M, Burke J, Chen Z, Cogan D, Fader L, Guo X, McKibben B, Marshall DR, Nemoto
PA, and Yu H (2014) Patent Number US20140323468A1 Naphthyridines, azaindoles and
related compounds as aldosterone synthase inhibitors and their preparation, pp 185,
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Germany.
Bauman DR, Rudnick SI, Szewczuk LM, Jin Y, Gopishetty S, and Penning TM (2005)
Development of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug analogs and steroid carboxylates
selective for human aldo-keto reductase isoforms: potential antineoplastic agents that
work independently of cyclooxygenase isozymes. Mol Pharmacol 67:60-68.
Boldyreff B and Wehling M (2003) Non-genomic actions of aldosterone: mechanisms and
consequences in kidney cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:1693-1695.
Brem AS and Gong R (2015) Therapeutic targeting of aldosterone: a novel approach to the
treatment of glomerular disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 128:527-535.
Breyer-Pfaff U and Nill K (2000) High-affinity stereoselective reduction of the enantiomers of
ketotifen and of ketonic nortriptyline metabolites by aldo-keto reductases from human
liver. Biochem Pharmacol 59:249-260.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
22
Breyer-Pfaff U and Nill K (2004) Carbonyl reduction of naltrexone and dolasetron by
oxidoreductases isolated from human liver cytosol. J Pharm Pharmacol 56:1601-1606.
Cerny MA (2013) Progress towards clinically useful aldosterone synthase inhibitors. Curr Top
Med Chem 13:1385-1401.
Cerny MA (2016) Prevalence of Non-Cytochrome P450-Mediated Metabolism in Food and Drug
Administration-Approved Oral and Intravenous Drugs: 2006-2015. Drug Metab Dispos
44:1246-1252.
Cerny MA, Csengery A, Schmenk J, and Frederick K (2015) Development of CYP11B1 and
CYP11B2 assays utilizing homogenates of adrenal glands: Utility of monkey as a
surrogate for human. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 154:197-205.
Deyashiki Y, Taniguchi H, Amano T, Nakayama T, Hara A, and Sawada H (1992) Structural and
functional comparison of two human liver dihydrodiol dehydrogenases associated with 3
alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity. Biochem J 282 ( Pt 3):741-746.
Dooley R, Harvey BJ, and Thomas W (2012) Non-genomic actions of aldosterone: from
receptors and signals to membrane targets. Mol Cell Endocrinol 350:223-234.
Edwards YH, Potter J, and Hopkinson DA (1980) Human FAD-dependent NAD(P)H diaphorase.
Biochem J 187:429-436.
Funder JW (2001) Non-genomic actions of aldosterone: role in hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol
Hypertens 10:227-230.
Gebel T and Maser E (1992) Characterization of carbonyl reducing activity in continuous cell
lines of human and rodent origin. Biochem Pharmacol 44:2005-2012.
Hara A, Taniguchi H, Nakayama T, and Sawada H (1990) Purification and properties of multiple
forms of dihydrodiol dehydrogenase from human liver. J Biochem 108:250-254.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
23
Hu Q, Yin L, and Hartmann RW (2014) Aldosterone synthase inhibitors as promising treatments
for mineralocorticoid dependent cardiovascular and renal diseases. J Med Chem 57:5011-
5022.
Hua W, Zhang H, Ryu S, Yang X, and Di L (2017) Human Tissue Distribution of Carbonyl
Reductase 1 Using Proteomic Approach With Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass
Spectrometry. J Pharm Sci 106:1405-1411.
Hwang MH, Yoo JK, Luttrell M, Kim HK, Meade TH, English M, Segal MS, and Christou DD
(2013) Mineralocorticoid receptors modulate vascular endothelial function in human
obesity. Clin Sci (Lond) 125:513-520.
Iwata N, Inazu N, and Satoh T (1992) Consecutive treatment of disulfiram inhibits ovarian
carbonyl reductase activity in rats. Jpn J Pharmacol 58:167-173.
Kraemer RJ and Deitrich RA (1968) Isolation and characterization of human liver aldehyde
dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 243:6402-6408.
Malatkova P, Maser E, and Wsol V (2010) Human carbonyl reductases. Curr Drug Metab
11:639-658.
Malatkova P and Wsol V (2014) Carbonyl reduction pathways in drug metabolism. Drug Metab
Rev 46:96-123.
Matsuura K, Deyashiki Y, Sato K, Ishida N, Miwa G, and Hara A (1997) Identification of amino
acid residues responsible for differences in substrate specificity and inhibitor sensitivity
between two human liver dihydrodiol dehydrogenase isoenzymes by site-directed
mutagenesis. Biochem J 323 ( Pt 1):61-64.
Mylari BL, Larson ER, Beyer TA, Zembrowski WJ, Aldinger CE, Dee MF, Siegel TW, and
Singleton DH (1991) Novel, potent aldose reductase inhibitors: 3,4-dihydro-4-oxo-3-[[5-
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
24
(trifluoromethyl)-2-benzothiazolyl] methyl]-1-phthalazineacetic acid (zopolrestat) and
congeners. J Med Chem 34:108-122.
Oparil S and Schmieder RE (2015) New approaches in the treatment of hypertension. Circ Res
116:1074-1095.
Porter SJ, Somogyi AA, and White JM (2000) Kinetics and inhibition of the formation of 6beta-
naltrexol from naltrexone in human liver cytosol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 50:465-471.
Rosemond MJ and Walsh JS (2004) Human carbonyl reduction pathways and a strategy for their
study in vitro. Drug Metab Rev 36:335-361.
Shi SM and Di L (2017) The role of carbonyl reductase 1 in drug discovery and development.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 13:859-870.
Steckelbroeck S, Oyesanmi B, Jin Y, Lee SH, Kloosterboer HJ, and Penning TM (2006)
Tibolone metabolism in human liver is catalyzed by 3alpha/3beta-hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase activities of the four isoforms of the aldo-keto reductase (AKR)1C
subfamily. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 316:1300-1309.
Vinson GP and Coghlan JP (2010) Expanding view of aldosterone action, with an emphasis on
rapid action. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 37:410-416.
Weldon SM, Cerny MA, Gueneva-Boucheva K, Cogan D, Guo X, Moss N, Parmentier JH,
Richman JR, Reinhart GA, and Brown NF (2016) Selectivity of BI 689648, a Novel,
Highly Selective Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitor: Comparison with FAD286 and LCI699
in Nonhuman Primates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 359:142-150.
Wermuth B (1981) Purification and properties of an NADPH-dependent carbonyl reductase from
human brain. Relationship to prostaglandin 9-ketoreductase and xenobiotic ketone
reductase. J Biol Chem 256:1206-1213.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
25
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
26
Figures
Figure 1 Structures of compounds 1-5
Figure 2 Major MS fragments for compound 1 and metabolites.
Figure 3 Metabolic scheme for compound 1.
Figure 4 Chiral chromatography of 3 (A), 1 (B), incubation of 2 with HLCyt + NADPH, and
incubation of 2 with HLCyt spiked with 3.
Figure 5 Comparison of the reductive metabolism of 2 to 1 in human tissues cytosol and
microsomes supplemented with NADPH or NADH.
Figure 6 Comparison of the reductive metabolism of 2 in cytosols across tissues from human,
monkey, dog, and rat supplemented with NADPH.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
27
Tables
Table 1. Enzyme kinetic parameters for conversion of 2 to 1 in various matrices supplemented
with either NADPH or NADH.
Source Tissue Fraction Cofactor Km Vmax Clint
μM pmol/min/mg μL/min/mg protein
hCBR1 NADPH 107.6 1180 10.97
Human Liver Cytosol NADPH 91.2 15.8 0.17
Cytosol NADH 63.6 0.49 0.0078
Microsomes NADPH 52.3 1.68 0.032
Microsomes NADH 56.4 0.15 0.0027
Intestine Cytosol NADPH 39.8 7.38 0.19
Lung Cytosol NADPH 209 21.4 0.10
Kidney Cytosol NADPH 94.2 9.01 0.10
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
28
Table 2. The effect of reductase inhibitors on the conversion of 2 to 1 in HLCyt supplemented
with NADPH.a
Inhibitor Enzyme Targets % Inhibition
Reference 10 µM 100 µM
Phenobarbital AKR1A1
AKR1B1 2.4 -2.7 (Gebel and Maser, 1992)
Zopolrestat AKR1B1 10.3 15.2 (Mylari et al., 1991)
Phenolphthalein
AKR1C1
AKR1C2
AKR1C3
AKR1C4
6.6 6.0 (Atalla et al., 2000;
Steckelbroeck et al., 2006)
Flufenamic acid
AKR1C1
AKR1C2
AKR1C3
AKR1C4
8.0 18.1 (Matsuura et al., 1997; Atalla
et al., 2000)
Chenodeoxycholic acid AKR1C2 -0.9 -2.9 (Bauman et al., 2005)
Medroxyprogesterone
17-acetate
AKR1C1
AKR1C2
AKR1C4
5.0 6.4 (Hara et al., 1990)
Dexamethasone AKR1C4 0.7 -7.6 (Deyashiki et al., 1992)
Indomethacin
AKR1C1
AKR1C2
AKR1C3
AKR1C4
CBR
-0.2 12.2 (Gebel and Maser, 1992)
Menadione CBR/SDR 32.6 95.7 (Wermuth, 1981; Porter et al.,
2000)
Quercetin CBR/SDR 56.4 81.6 (Wermuth, 1981)
Ethacrynic acid CBR/SDR 11.6 34.4 (Wermuth, 1981; Atalla et al.,
2000; Atalla and Maser, 2001)
Dicumarol Quinone
oxidoredutase 19.7 11.2 (Edwards et al., 1980)
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
29
4-Methylpyrazole Alcohol
dehydrogenase 1.8 2.2 (Atalla and Maser, 2001)
Disulfiram Aldehyde
dehydrogenase 5.9 43.5 (Kraemer and Deitrich, 1968)
a – Incubations were performed at a 15 μM concentration of 2 and a 1 mg/mL protein
concentration of HLCyt for 5 min at 37 °C.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
30
Figure 1.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
31
Figure 2.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
32
Figure 3.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
33
Figure 4.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
34
Figure 5.
0 .0 0
0 .0 5
0 .1 0
0 .1 5
0 .2 0
Cl i
nt
(L
/min
/mg
pro
tein
)
L iv e r C y to so l + N A D P H
L iv e r C y to so l + N A D H
L iv e r M ic ro so m e s + N A D P H
L iv e r M ic ro so m e s + N A D H
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD # 82487
35
Figure 6.
0 .0 0
0 .0 2
0 .0 4
0 .0 6
0 .0 8
0 .1 0
0 .2 0
0 .4 0
0 .6 0
Cl i
nt
(L
/min
/mg
pro
tein
)
H u m an M o n k e y D o g R a t
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on August 1, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.082487
at ASPE
T Journals on Septem
ber 20, 2020dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from