Hope Tesh-Blum Division of Accountability Services Testing Section EC Conference/July 2001

1

North Carolina Department of Public InstructionDivision of Accountability ServicesJuly 24, 2001

Hope Tesh-Blum

Division of Accountability Services

Testing Section

EC Conference/July 2001

The North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory

2


What will I cover today?


• Why was it developed?

• Who’s Eligible?

• History and Timeline

• What is it?

• When is it completed?

• How to complete it?

• Where do you get it?

• Changes for 2001-02 school year

• ABCs

3


• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1997– All students, including those with IEPs or

Section 504 plans, must participate in the statewide testing program.

– NC Alternate Assessment Portfolio (NCAAP)– NC Computerized Adaptive Testing System

(NCCATS) Accommodation


Why was the NCAAAI Developed?

4


Which students are Eligible?

• Must have a current Individualized Education Program (IEP) or Section 504 Plan

• Must be following the NC Standard Course of Study (NCSCS) {important}

• Unable to access statewide testing with or without accommodations {important}

• Must have an assigned grade level of 3-8

5


Who decides?

• The IEP TeamIEP Team determines student participation in the NCAAAI and the grade level at which the student will be assessed.

• Different options

6


History of the NCAAAI

• Late Fall 2000– It was determined that a small group of students

could not be supported by the NCAAP or NCCATs

– Late December 2000/Development began– Discussion/Conflict concerning implementation

dates (Spring 2001 vs. Fall 2001)

7


Examples of Students needing a separate

Alternate Assessment:

• Newly-blinded students who have not mastered Braille

• Students with learning disabilities needing assessment below the third grade

• Students with serious physical disabilities that prevent participation

8


Who Helped in the Development and Improvement?

• NCDPI Exceptional Children Division

• NCDPI Division of Instructional Services

• NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section

• Regional Accountability Coordinators• Assessor Input (NCAAAI Review Sheet)

{important}

• Technical Outreach for Public Schools (NCSU)

9


Timeline for the NCAAAI• March 2001

– Inventories available on-line (TNN)

– Order system up• April 2001

– Intact notebooks are shipped

• June 2001– Notebooks returned to the

NCDPI• July 2001

– 2001-02 Inventories available on-line (TNN)

• August 2001– Reports and Notebooks returned

to LEAs– 2001-02 shipped

10


What will be Different in 2001-02 from 2000-01?• Teacher/Assessor feedback

• Descriptors/Scales

• Less repetition/Fewer forms

• More training/More detailed Administrative Guide

• LEAs do not return the notebooks

• No Grade 10 Inventory for HSCT

11


What is the NCAAAI?

• Checklist of competencies scored using individual scales for each content area (new)– Reading (Grades K-8)– Mathematics (Grades K-8)– Writing (Grades 4 & 7)

• Notebook (binder) format

• Collection of evidence to support scores

12


When are the Inventories Scored?

• Three times per year– First month of school=Baseline data– First month of the second semester of

school=Mid-Year Winter data– Last month of school=Final Spring data

• Evidence is collected to support Final Spring scores.

13


How is the Inventory Scored?

• The assessor uses the Description of Student Performance for a particular content area to give each competency a score from 1-8 or NA (not applicable).

• Using the individual competency scores, determine the subheading score(s).

• Using the subheading score(s), determine the Overall Score.

14


MATHEMATICS SKILLSNorth Carolina Testing Program

North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic InventoryDescription of Student Performance

Descriptors Description of Performance

Distinguished8 – High7 – Low

Student consistently demonstrates mastery beyond grade-level skills,strategies, competencies, and expectations.

Student makes applications and extensions beyond grade level.

Proficient6 – High5 – Low

Student consistently demonstrates mastery of grade-level skills,strategies, and competencies.

Student responds with appropriate answers or procedures.

Apprentice4 – High3 – Low

Student occasionally demonstrates mastery of grade-level skills,strategies, and competencies.

Student sometimes responds with appropriate answers or procedures.

Novice2 – High1 – Low

Student rarely or never demonstrates mastery of grade-level skills,strategies, and competencies.

Student frequently responds with inappropriate answers and/orprocedures.

ScaleNovice Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

15


Achievement Levels: Final Spring Overall Score• Assessed On-Grade

Level:– Level 4 (7-8)– Level 3 (5-6)– Level 2 (3-4)– Level 1 (1-2)

• Assessed Off-Grade Level:– Student may only

receive a Level 1 or Level 2

16


Examples of Evidence

• Local Tests (LT)

• Samples of Student Work (SW)

• Teacher Observations (TO)

• Teacher-Made Tests (TT)

• Audio Tapes (AN)

• Other (specify)

17


Data Collection 2001-02

• Scores will be transferred to student scannable sheets during the last month of school

• Local Test Coordinators will scan the sheets

• Data will be transferred to the NCDPI during the end-of-year process

• Student Notebooks will be stored locally for six months (randomly request)

18


How do LEAs order the NCAAAI?

• Local procedure to collect information (number participating)

– Number of notebook binders

– Number of inventories by content area (R, M, or W) and assessed grade level (K-8)

• Information is passed to the LEA Test Coordinator who orders on-line (TNN)

• Materials will be shipped to the LEA TC

• School distribution (by secure means) is a local procedure

19


Training?

• Train-the-Trainer Model• NCDPI Trains Regional Accountability

Coordinators (RACs)• RACs train the LEA Test Coordinator• LEA TC trains the EC Director• Training for local staff is a collaboration

between Testing and EC personnel (local decision)

20


NCAAAI and the ABCs

2000-012000-01• Pilot Study• Not included in

School Accountability• Number of students

participating will be included in Volume II.

2001-20022001-2002• Operational

administration• Pending data analysis

– Performance Composite

– Growth Component

21


NCAAAI and Student Accountability

2000-012000-01• Pilot Study• Not used for Student

Accountability Standard at Grade 5

2001-20022001-2002• Operational

administration• Pending data analysis• Not yet determined for

Grades 3, 5 & 8

22


More Information

• Testing Section Website:

www.NCPublicSchools.org/accountability/testing

• LEA Test Coordinator may contact Regional Accountability Coordinator for questions

Hope Tesh-Blum Division of Accountability Services Testing Section EC Conference/July 2001

Documents

Transcript of Hope Tesh-Blum Division of Accountability Services Testing Section EC Conference/July 2001