Hall-C 12 GeV Project Overview of SHMS detector system, Requirements, and Schedule Howard Fenker
description
Transcript of Hall-C 12 GeV Project Overview of SHMS detector system, Requirements, and Schedule Howard Fenker
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 1 Hall-C
Hall-C 12 GeV ProjectOverview of SHMS detector system,
Requirements, and ScheduleHoward Fenker
for
Physics Opportunities in Hall C at 12 GeVAugust 5, 2008
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 2 Hall-C
Outline • Upgrade Project Timeline Overview• Summary of CD-3 (Lehman) Review – July ‘08• Detectors: Where to go and How to get there?
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 3 Hall-C
DOE CRITICAL DECISION SCHEDULE
Lehman-07 EIR-07 Lehman-08
CD-0 Mission Need 2QFY04 (A) 2QFY04 (A) 2QFY04 (A)
CD-1 Preliminary Baseline Range 2QFY06 (A) 2QFY06 (A) 2QFY06 (A)
CD-2 Performance Baseline 4QFY07 1QFY08 1QFY08 (A)
CD-3 Start of Construction 4QFY08 4QFY08 4QFY08
CD-4A Accelerator Project Completion and Start of Operations NA 1QFY15* 1QFY15
CD-4B Experimental Equipment Project Completion and Start of Operations 3QFY15 3QFY15 3QFY15
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 4 Hall-C
CD-3 RequirementsDOE O413.3A:
1. Final Design
2. Update CD-2 Project Documentation
3. Independent Project (Lehman) Review
4. Hazard Analysis Report
5. Preliminary Security Vulnerability
Assessment Report
6. Construction Project Safety and Health
Plan7. Final Sustainable Environmental
Stewardship-High Performance Sustainable Building
8. Quality Assurance Program
Final Design “Complete and review Final Design or
determine that the design is sufficiently mature to start procurement or construction.”
• Mature Design– Civil: Hall D Complex 100% ; Accel
95% ; CHL Addition 100%– Accelerator: >90% complete w/98% of
documentation required for FY09
procurements– Physics: >90% complete, ready for
FY09 procurements
• Procurement Planning well-advanced– 28 APPs approved, 13 specifications
complete
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 5 Hall-C
12 GeV UPGRADE SCHEDULE
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 6 Hall-C
Lehman Review for CD-3• Introduction to Hall-C
– Motivation for the Upgrade– Description / Requirements /
Specifications / Design Status• Detector System (this talk)• Magnets / Shield House / Support
Structure (Paul Brindza)
• Project Plan– FY08 R&D – PED Summary– Construction
• Labor / Procurement / Schedule• Previous Reviews and
Recommendations• Checkout / Testing / Commissioning• Risk Management• Summary
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 7 Hall-C
• Pion and nucleon form factors at high Q2
• Deep inelastic scattering at high Bjorken x • Semi-inclusive scattering at high hadron momenta• Polarized and unpolarized scattering on nuclei
Motivation for Hall C Upgrade
• Highest Luminosity (L=1038 nucleons/cm2/s)
• Pair of magnetic spectrometers (SHMS + existing HMS) • Detection of charged particles with highest momenta• Accuracy and reproducibility• Small angle capability • Very good particle identification• Compatibility with all target configurations
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 8 Hall-C
Hall C: SHMS Design Parameters SHMS = “Super High Momentum Spectrometer”
• Key Features:– will be used together with existing
spectrometer (HMS)– 3 quadrupole magnets, 1 dipole magnet
• Provides easily calibrated optics and wide acceptance
• Uses magnets very similar to existing ones– 1 horizontal bend magnet
• Allows forward acceptance• New design, developed in collaboration w/MSU
– 6 element detector package • Drift Chambers / Hodoscopes / Cerenkovs /
Calorimeter• All derived from existing HMS/SOS detector
designs– Rigid Support Structure / Well-Shielded
Detector Enclosure• Reproduces Pointing Accuracy & Reproducibility
demonstrated in HMS– Similar technical elements are all already in
use at JLab
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 9 Hall-C
SHMS Overall Design
Dipole18.4 Degree
BendMax Field: 4.76 T
EFL: 2.85 m
Q2 Q3Max Gradient:
14.4 T/mEFL: 1.61 m
Q1Max Gradient:
10.63 T/mEFL: 1.86m
Bender3 Degree Bend
Max Field: 3.11 TEFL: 0.75 m
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 10 Hall-C
Mini-Slides: Project Management
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 11 Hall-C
SHMS Experiment Resolution Requirements
Experiment p (GeV)
Δp/p (%) Δθ (rad) Δφ (rad)
Pion Form Factor 2.2-8.1 2x10-3 1.5x10-3 1.5x10-3
Transition Form Factors*
1.0-8.5 1x10-3 1.0x10-3 1.0x10-3
* Not yet submitted to PAC
Δp/p (%) Δθ (radians)Δφ (radians)
Spec’d ResolutionSpec’d Resolution & MCS
2x Spec’d Resolution & MCS
-10% +22%
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 12 Hall-C
SHMS PID Requirements : negative polarity
Experiment p (GeV)
Req’d e-:π- Disc.
Spec’d NG Cerenkov
Spec’d Calorimeter
Total Expected
E12-06-101 2.2 - 8.1 4.5•103:1
50:1
(HMS Cerenkov gives up to 300:1
now)
>200:1
(1000:1 above 6 GeV/c)
>104:1
E12-06-104 5.4 - 5.8 103:1
E12-07-103 2.4 - 8.5 103:1
E12-06-105 (x>1) 4.8 -10.6 5•103:1
E12-06-110 (c) 2.2 - 6.8 103:1
E12-06-121 6.3 - 7.5 >102:1
• PID requirements at negative polarity are dominated by the x>1 experiment
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 13 Hall-C
SHMS PID Requirements: positive polarity
Experiment p (GeV)
Req’d π+ :(K,p) Discrimination
Spec’d HG Cerenkov
E12-06-101 (Fpi-3) 2.2 - 8.1 104:1 *
SeeChart
E12-06-107 (c) 5.1 - 9.6 104:1
E12-07-103 (pion factorization)
2.4 - 8.5 103:1
PID requirements at positive polarity driven by Fpi-3 and pion factorization experiments
• These require the heavy gas Cerenkov over the full momentum range
Kaon electroproduction requires an aerogel Cerenkov detector
HG Cerenkov
AerogelCerenkov(not in project but space reserved)
Experiment Needs
Dis
crim
inat
ion
Pow
er
Momentum (GeV/c)
TOF
* Fpi-3 spec’ s PID as “104 at 8GeV/c” using the HG Cerenkov.
*
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 14 Hall-C
Shower Counter
S2 Hodoscope
C4F8O Cerenkov
S1 Hodoscope Drift Chambers
Ar/Ne Cerenkov
Space Reserved for Aerogel Cerenkov
Hall-C SHMS Detector SystemNoble Gas CerenkovDrift ChambersTrigger Hodoscopes
•3 Planes Scintillator Paddles•1 Plane Quartz
Heavy Gas CerenkovCalorimeterDetector Frames
(color coding)12 GeV Project FundedNSF MRI Funding (MOU’s are in approval stage)Gift from HERMES
(testing is on-Project R&D)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 15 Hall-C
The SHMS Detector SystemNoble Gas Cerenkov: e/π (or π /K) separation at high momenta
2.5 m long gas radiator at atmospheric pressure•Argon: π threshold ~ 6 GeV/c•Adding Neon: threshold may be varied up to 12 GeV/c•Para-Terphynyl PMT window over-coating •Performance 20 photoelectrons
(worst case: pure Neon)
At low momenta: remove mirrors, insert coupling so that the tankbecomes part of the vacuum system – reduces MCS
University of Virginia
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 16 Hall-C
The SHMS Detector SystemNoble Gas Cerenkov
4 spherical mirrors, 45cm x 45 cm
Ray-trace simulation of optics.
Reference Design (HMS Cerenkov)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 17 Hall-C
BASEPLATE
GAS WINDOW
CATHODE FOIL
VÕPLANE
X PLANE
CATHODE FOIL
CATHODE FOIL
CATHODE FOIL
CATHODE FOIL
CATHODE FOIL
CATHODE FOIL
CATHODE FOIL
UÕPLANE
XÕPLANE
V PLANE
U PLANE
GAS WINDOW
BASEPLATE
AMPLIFIERMOUNTING PLATE
Z
XYBEAM
CATHODE WIREHV INPUT
FIELD WIREHV INPUT
The SHMS Detector SystemDrift Chambers: charged particle tracking; momentum & angle measurement
Design of Drift Chambers is straightforward re-scaling of existing SOS chambers and HKS chambers – both built by Hampton University
Hampton UniversityNSF MRI Funding
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 18 Hall-C
The SHMS Detector SystemDrift Chambers: straightforward re-scaling of existing SOS chambers – demonstrated to achieve 180 µm resolution.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 19 Hall-C
The SHMS Detector SystemTrigger Hodoscopes: basic trigger; efficiency determination.
•3 Planes Scintillator Paddles + 1 Plane Quartz BarsS1X: 12 bars 8cm x 110 cm x 5mmS1Y: 14 bars 8cm x 90cm x 5mmS2X: 14 bars 8cm x 140cm x 5mm
S2Y: 10 quartz bars: 11cm 115cm x 2.5 cm
0.5 cm overlap / 2 PMTs on each bar
James Madison UniversityNSF MRI Funding
North Carolina A&TNSF MRI Funding
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 20 Hall-C
The SHMS Detector SystemTrigger Hodoscopes
S1-XFront View
905 mm
900 mm
Mechanical Design is a re-scaling of existing HMS/SOS design
0.5cm paddle overlap – all paddles
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 21 Hall-C
The SHMS Detector SystemHeavy Gas Cerenkov: π/K separation for momenta > 3.4 GeV
Gas choice now C4F8O (instead of C4F10)•Widely used in semiconductor industry•Many commercial suppliers•Much less expensive than C4F10
•Extensively studied by BTeV•Stable, non-toxic, non-explosive, non-reactive•Does not destroy ozone
51.05
91.33
117 °
113 °
95 cm
155 cm110 cm
0.020" Ti Window
5" FlatPMT
Side Elevation Line Drawing
University of Regina
SLD ECRID Gas System
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 22 Hall-C
The SHMS Detector SystemCalorimeter: e/π separation
Side Elevation
Front Elevation
Plan view
Yerevan Physics InstitutePreshower: Re-use SOSShower: Gift from HERMES
•Lead-Glass Block / PMT / Base Assemblies from HERMES•Low-Exposure modules from HERMES selected•Now On-Hand at JLab•Tests-to-Date indicate the modules are perfectly suitable for SHMS
•Glass Transparency•PMT Gain•Stability
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 23 Hall-C
The SHMS Detector SystemCalorimeter:
Pb-Glass and PMT performance of HERMES tubes is still very good.
R&D Task under CR08-028
Pb-Glass transmission measured –<10% degradation since 1994
1 p.e. peak
20 p.e. peak
HERMES PMT Virgin PMTPhilips XP3461
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 24 Hall-C
SHMS Shield HouseShield House: low radiation flux for detectors & electronics
Graph shows results of Simulations normalized to measurements in HMS
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.00 10 20 30 40
Spectrometer Angle (deg)
SHMS detec tor hutSHMS elec tronics hutHMS
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.01.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0Conc rete density (g/cm3)
Normalized to nominalconc rete dens ity (2.40 g/cm3)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 25 Hall-C
SHMS Electronics Channels Needed vs. Channels on-hand
ChannelsWC
Preamps WC TDCs SplittersDigital Delay
Analog Sums
PMT TDCs ADCs Disc Scaler HV Logic FB NIM VME
NG Cerenkov 4 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4
Drift Chambers 1404 1404 1404 0 0 0 0 0 8 1
Sc Hodoscopes 100 0 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100
Qtz Hodoscope 20 0 0 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 HG Cerenkov 4 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 Preshower 32 0 0 32 32 33 0 32 32 Calorimeter 224 0 0 224 224 240 0 224 224 3 Control/Trig 40 32 30 1 1 1SHMS Needs 1404 1404 384 384 281 128 384 160 32 392 30 2 4 1Inventory: 1472 1536 384 272 128 192 536 244 176 752 32 2 4 1
Re-design of calorimeter to use HERMES blocks increased the channel count significantly, leaving us without enough analog summing units. Anticipate using Change-Request process to shift funds from WC preamps (now located in-house) to procurement of summers..
We Expect to find enough of these in our stock
SHMS Detector Electronics
Above inventory was prepared in response to Recommendation C-Det08-4: SHMS Detector Review (Jan 2008)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 26 Hall-C
Hall-C Upgrade - Other• Beamline Upgrades on Project:
– Moller Polarimeter: connect existing power supply to existing magnet
– Compton polarimeter: elevation change & vacuum connections– Arc Energy Measurement: 12GeV funds techs to map magnets;
Hall-C staff analyzes data– Downstream Beamline to Dump: designed – build pipe & stands– Scattering Chamber: on hand – need only to modify vacuum
connections
• SHMS Quadrupole Magnets Measurements– Determine optical centerlines– Measure multipole contributions to quads
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 27 Hall-C
Hall C R&D (WBS 1.1.4)YEAR R&D Report
#Task Description
2007 Halls A/C-6 Hall C Study of Alternative Calorimeter Configurations.
2007 Halls A/C-7 Complete testing of the cable following re-shaping. Verify the reduction in critical current is less than 10%.
2007 Halls A/C-8 Design, build and test a scale cross section model of the SHMS HB coil suitable for testing.
2007 Halls A/C-9 Complete construction and assembly of a working prototype. Verify that a response of 80 photoelectrons is achievable with the chosen quartz/photomultiplier combination.
2008 Halls A/C-10 Progress on the Horizontal Bend Magnet trial wind. (see Paul’s talk)
2008 TBD Completion of the Horizontal Bend Magnet trial wind and testing.(see Paul’s talk)
2008 TBD(report drafted)
Selection of optimal HERMES lead-glass blocks and PMTs for the SHMS Calorimeter (see Vardan’s talk)
All R&D activities will be complete before September 30, 2008.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 28 Hall-C
Mini-Slides: Project Management
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 29 Hall-C
Mini-Slides: Project Management
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 30 Hall-C
Detectors Schedule
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 31 Hall-C
CD-3 Requirement: Final Design Review
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 32 Hall-C
JLab Design Review 2006 RecommendationsRecommendation SCMag-2: Spectrometer Superconducting Magnets (Sept 2006) “Study options for alternative designs that reduce heat load in the infringed portion of the HB magnet.”Status: A helium-bath option has been evaluated in collaboration with Michigan State University. The amount of heat expected (based on a series of test measurements) is small (10-20%) as compared to the cooling capability of the helium-bath design.
Closed (See Paul’s talk)
Recommendation SCMag-3: Spectrometer Superconducting Magnets (Sept 2006) “Consider requirements for radiation-hard materials for the HB magnet.”Status: Radiation-hard materials were investigated. Test measurements and calculations demonstrate they are not required.
Closed (See Paul’s talk)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 33 Hall-C
Recommendation SCMag-5: Spectrometer Superconducting Magnets (Sept 2006) “Consider use of alternative superconductors and configurations for the HB and Solenoid.”
Status: Alternative superconductors were considered, and the existing superconductor appear to give the best cost-performance optimization. For the Solenoid, an additional design study by CEA Saclay (France) investigated configurations also based on alternative superconductors with results reported in June 2008.
Closed (See Paul’s talk)
JLab Design Review 2006/8 Recommendations
Recommendation SC-Mag08-1: SC Magnet Review (April 2008)
“Relax the HB magnet procurement priority and require a reference design.”
Status:The HB magnet procurement schedule has been delayed in order to allow additional time for completion and review of a full reference design prior to initiating procurement. The reference design has been started and is expected to be completed by October 2008, with a final design review planned for 1QFY09.
Closed (CR08-042 provides Reference Design by 9/30)
Hall-C Hall-B
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 34 Hall-C
Recommendation C-Det08-1: SHMS Detector Review (Jan 2008) “Identify key experiments to be done by SHMS and ensure that all detector concepts meet physics driven requirements. Assure that the technical specifications, and performance of each subsystem in the tests following construction, are consistent with the physics driven requirements (for example, light output from the quartz detector plane intended for triggering) .”
Status:Such technical specifications are one of the charges to the annual 12 GeV
related Program Advisory Committee meetings. A full overview of Hall C approved experiments by the 2006 and 2007 12 GeV Program Advisory Committee meetings (30 & 32) with detailed physics requirements and associated performance specifications for the detectors is being collected, and will be ready by the July 2008 IPR review.
Open
JLab Design Review 2008 Recommendations
Summary of spec’s was shown in opening slides.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 35 Hall-C
Recommendation C-Det08-2: SHMS Detector Review (Jan 2008) “After all engineering designs are completed, a final review should be held prior to major procurements or construction.”
Status:A detector final engineering design review has been
scheduled for 4QFY09.Open (but recall detector schedule slide)
JLab Design Review 2008 Recommendations
Recommendation C-Det08-3: SHMS Detector Review (Jan 2008) “The project would benefit from involvement of an experienced Hall-C integration engineer to review individual subsystem designs and provide oversight during assembly and installation.”
Status:A Hall C staff scientist with extensive detector-system
experience has taken on this responsibility.
Closed
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 36 Hall-C
Recommendation C-Det08-4: SHMS Detector Review (Jan 2008) “A detailed inventory of all electronics to be used for this detector system must be developed and documented. Access to the electronics by the groups who will build individual subsystems is important to assure that technical requirements of each subsystem are met.”
Status:An inventory of electronics existing within the Hall-C infrastructure is
ongoing and will be ready in July 2008. The electronics needs for individual subsystem testing at universities is being evaluated and will be captured in the respective MOUs.
Open (but recall inventory shown earlier)
JLab Design Review 2008 Recommendations
SHMS Electronics Channels Needed vs. Channels on-hand
ChannelsWC
Preamps WC TDCs SplittersDigital Delay
Analog Sums PMT TDCs ADCs Disc Scaler HV Logic FB NIM VME
NG Cerenkov 4 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4
Drift Chambers 1404 1404 1404 0 0 0 0 0 8 1
Sc Hodoscopes 100 0 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100
Qtz Hodoscope 20 0 0 20 20 0 20 20 20 20
HG Cerenkov 4 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4
Preshower 32 0 0 32 32 33 0 32 32
Calorimeter 224 0 0 224 224 240 0 224 224 3
Control/Trig 40 32 30 1 1 1
SHMS Needs 1404 1404 384 384 281 128 384 160 32 392 30 2 4 1
Inventory: 1472 1536 384 272 128 192 536 244 176 752 32 2 4 1
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 37 Hall-C
Mini-Slides: Checkout Plans / Risk Mgt.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 38 Hall-C
Lehman-Review SUMMARY• SHMS is well-suited to the requirements of experiments
– Angle & Momentum Coverage– Resolution– Particle-ID Discrimination Power– Magnet System / Support / Shielding (Paul’s talk)
• Detector System design– Conservative– Based on demonstrated (existing) technologies
• Significant support from experienced user community• Integration plan in place• Basic designs complete
• Safety is integrated from the beginning– e.g. choice of Cerenkov gas, design of structure
• R&D Performed to lower technical risks (complete by Sept. ‘08)– Calorimetry – re-use HERMES blocks (after testing!)– Magnets – HB heating, cable tests, coil winding – (Paul’s talk)
• PM & EVMS tools are in use to direct and track project performance• All FY09 Major Procurements have Approved APPs. One solicitation issued.
READY AND ANXIOUS TO START CONSTRUCTION !
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 39 Hall-C
The Future for SHMS Detectors• Where are we now?
– All detectors are “prototyped” and – Have “Reference Designs” in the sense that They are ALL straightforward re-designs of existing hardware.
• Where do we need to go?– FINAL DESIGN Review by 9/30/09– INSTALLATION during 2/1/13 – 8/31/13– FINAL CHECKOUT on SHMS (no beam) by 2/28/14– READY FOR BEAM by 10/1/14– PHYSICS BEGINS 4/1/15
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 40 Hall-C
The Future for SHMS Detectors• FINAL DESIGN Review by 9/30/09
– Quarterly Progress Meetings: • October ’08 (should set date now – propose October 1, 2008)
– Final definition of active detector volumes– Draft of each detector’s reserved space
» Plan and Elevation views with real dimensions for active volumes or components; draft layout for frames, supports, PMTs, front-end electronics, cables, piping, etc.
– Mike Fowler is working to provide draft layout data now.• February ’09
– Final definition of reserved space in detector stack» Plan and Elevation Assembly drawings with full dimensioning – all on-detector items. » Proposed detailed plumbing/wiring layout.
– Provide specifications for supporting services:» Readout electronics, HVPS, LVPS rack space requirements, number of
NIM/FB/CAMAC/VME slots and rough locations.» Cable list (from/to, how many, what type, patch panels, …)» Utilities & Services Requirements: AC power, gas, vents, plumbing.» Other support hardware space needs: pumps, refrigerators, manifolds, distribution
systems, lasers, etc.• June ’09
– Final resolution of interferences.– Detail of mounting and alignment systems– Layout of all supporting hardware, cable/plumbing routing & supports, patch panel and
electronics locations.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Page 41 Hall-C
Summary
• With CD-3 almost behind us we are “Ready for Construction”• Now the FUN begins!
• DETECTOR CONSTRUCTION– MRI-Funded Detectors: 2009 – 2011– 12GeV-Funded Detectors: 2012
• INSTALLATION during 2/1/13 – 8/31/13– FINAL CHECKOUT on SHMS (no beam) by 2/28/14– READY FOR BEAM by 10/1/14– PHYSICS BEGINS 4/1/15