Group08 Presentation
-
Upload
akyadav123 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Group08 Presentation
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
1/16
Evaluating Impact
valuating Impact
Turning Promises into Evidenceurning Promises into Evidence
HalaHala SalahSalah
Hany ElHany El--SawahSawah
Hany ElHany El--SayedSayed MadkourMadkour
HebaHeba BahaaBahaa ElEl--DinDin
MohamedMohamed MarzoukMarzoukMohamedMohamed SharawySharawy
SamirSamir ElEl--Sherief Sherief
TarekTarek TobelyTobely
Yasser Gad AllahYasser Gad Allah
January 2008January 2008
MIS ProjectMIS Project
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
2/16
2
1. Background
Higher Education Enhancement Project HEEP
FOEP Faculty of Education Project
ETCP Egyptian Technical Colleges Project
FLDP Faculty-Leadership Development Project
QAAP Quality Assurance and AccreditationProject
HEEPF Higher Education Enhancement ProjectFund
ICTP Information & Communication TechnologyProject
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
3/16
3
1. Background
Information & Communication Technology
Project ICTP
Infrastructure of information Networks
Management Information System (MIS)
e-learning Digital Libraries
ICT training
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
4/16
4
1. Background
Objectives of the MIS project
Establish MIS centers in 15 universities
Develop MIS application for all the Egyptianuniversities
Develop MIS/DSS for the SCU
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
5/16
5
2. Results Chain
InputsInputs ActivitiesActivities OutputsOutputs OutcomesOutcomes ImpactImpact
• Funds
• Data &information
• Humanresources
• TechnicalExpertise
•EstablishingMIS Centers
•Data Entry
•PurchasingEquipment
•Preparing MISapplications
•Training staff
•System testing& rollup
• Improved quality ,relevance, andefficiency ofhigher education
• Enhancedadministrativeprocedures
• Efficiency &effectiveness ofthe ManagementPerformance
• Efficient decisions
• Effective strategicplanning on microand macro level
• MIS Centers
• Reliabledatabases
• Trained staff
• MISapplications
• Reports
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
6/16
6
3. Primary Research Questions
Does the MIS project enhance theadministration & management efficiency?
Does the MIS project enhance the Quality
of higher education?
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
7/16
7
4. Outcome Indicators
Time taken to issue students’ certificates, IDs, …etc.
Time taken for a student to enroll
No. of documents (certificate, ID, … etc.) producedper unit of time
Time needed to finish students’ results
Time needed to get a student information
The adequacy and accuracy of the databases &
reports Availability of data for decision making
Staff, student, and top-management satisfaction for
administrative operations Cost effectiveness of the MIS project
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
8/16
8
4. Impact Indicators
The students’ average Cumulative Marks (nostandardized test)
The average No. of years to finish anacademic programs
The average time between graduation and
employment
The right matching between the
specialization and the job The average income for the graduates
The satisfaction of the job market with the
quality of the graduates
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
9/16
9
5. Identification Strategy/Method
Efficiency of Administrative system
Randomized roll out - 174 faculties
Quality of Education
Matched difference in differences - between200 treated faculties and 100 faculties thatchose not to participate in the program (non-treated)
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
10/16
10
5. Identification Strategy/Method
Faculties chose notto participate inthe MIS project
174 roll out
Phase 1:
87 faculties
Phase 2:
87 faculties
300 faculties
200 treated 100 not treated
26 pilot faculties
Matching/ DiD
Randomizationt = 0
t = 3 t = 9
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
11/16
11
5. Identification Strategy/Method
26 pilotfaculties
Phase 1:87 faculties
Phase 2:87 faculties
0 3 6 9 months
Randomization
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
12/16
12
6. Sample and data
Efficiency of Administrative system
Sample
Treatment: 87 randomly selected faculties Control: the rest of the 87 faculties
Data
Quantitative: administrative data Qualitative data: use and satisfaction of MIS
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
13/16
13
6. Sample and data
Quality of Education
Matched samples
Treatment: from 200 treated faculties Control: from non-treated 100 faculties
Data
Quantitative: administrative data Quantitative: tracer studies of graduates
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
14/16
14
7. Time Frame/Work Plan
Matching based on available data: Feb.2008
Baseline data collection (tracer study)
Randomization
Intervention Follow-up data collection: 2-3 rounds
26 pilot
faculties
Phase 1: 87
faculties
Phase 2: 87
faculties
0 3 6 9 months
Tracer study
Baseline data
Intervention
Randomization
Follow up data
collection
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
15/16
15
8. Sources of Financing
MIS project
Universities (Co-finance)
-
8/17/2019 Group08 Presentation
16/16
16
Thank You