Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 9 September 2011 Enhanced Direct Access – The approach of the Global...
-
Upload
neal-goodman -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 9 September 2011 Enhanced Direct Access – The approach of the Global...
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 9 September 2011
Enhanced Direct Access – The approach of the Global Fund.
Katja Roll External Relations and Partnerships
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Overview
Key Themes
• The Model of the Global Fund• Governance at the country – CCM• Grant Implementation arrangements – PR• Experience with Multi-Stakeholder Engagement
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
The Global Fund
Mandate and Model • Created in 2002 to finance the scale up of prevention, treatment and
care programs against the three diseases
• Global Fund model is based on country ownership, multi-stakeholder engagement and performance-based funding
• Total pledges available = US$ 30.6 billion
• To date, USD 22.4 billion approved, USD 14 billion disbursed
• Grants in 150 countries of which 90% are low and low-middle income countries
• Approximately 1/3 of granted resources is being channelled through civil society organisations
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
The Global Fund
Evolution of Funding (2002-2010)
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
The Global Fund
Contributions Top 10 Public Donors (2002-2010)
Total contributions from public donors (2002-2010):US$ 18.1 billion (95% of the total)
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
The Global Fund
Key Actors• The Global Fund Board• The Global Fund Secretariat• The Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM)• The Technical Review Panel • The Principal Recipient (PR)• Sub Recipients• The Local Fund Agent (LFA)• The Global Fund Trustee• The Office of Inspector General (OIG)• Technical Partners
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Donor Voting Block: Germany, Canada, Switzerland European Commission (Belgium,
Portugal, Finland) France, Spain Italy Japan Point Seven United Kingdom, Australia United States of America Private Foundations Private Sector
Implementing Voting Block: Eastern Europe Eastern Mediterranean Eastern and Southern Africa Latin America and the Caribbean South East Asia Western and Central Africa Western Pacific Developed Country NGO Developing Country NGO NGO rep of communities living with
the diseases
Non-voting Board Members World Health Organization World Bank UNAIDS Global Fund Partners (RBM, Stop TB, UNITAID) Board Designated Non-Voting Swiss Member
10 10
Governance at the global level
Composition of the international Board
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Governance at the country level
The Country Coordinating Mechanism
Why a (new) mechanism?
•Kofi Annan 2000: Need new mechanism because no other funding model existed that:
–Could move resources fast and efficiently (i.e. NOT UN, not WB)
–Was unencumbered by excessive politics (i.e. bilateral efforts)
–Integrated both public and private efforts (i.e. donors either funded NGOs directly or government directly, but couldn’t seem to bring the two together)
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
• Coordinate the development and submission of national proposals
• Nominate the Principal Recipient
• Oversee implementation of approved grants including assessment of Principal Recipient’s performance
• Approve any reprogramming and submit requests for continuation of funding
• Ensure linkages and consistency between Global Fund grants and other national health and development programs
Governance at the country level
The CCM: Roles and Responsibilities
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
• Transparent selection process for non-government sector
• Membership of affected communities
• Transparent proposal solicitation and review
• Transparent process for PR nomination
• Broad stakeholder input in proposal and oversight plan
• Conflict of interest policy
Governance at the country level
The CCM: Eligibility Criteria
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Governance at the country level
The CCM: Composition – Global Perspective
Composition by Sector
Strong recommendation that CCMs have 40% representation of non-governmental bodies.
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Governance at the country level
The CCM: Leadership by sector
EDU7% FBO
6%
GOV29%
ML/BL13%
NGO24%
KAP2%
OTH1%
PLWD13%
PS5%
EDU7%
FBO2%
GOV71%
ML/BL1%
NGO11%
KAP1%
OTH0%
PLWD3%
PS4%
Chair Distribution Vice Chair Distribution
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Grant Implementation
The Principle Recipient = Lead Implementer
•Signs a grant agreement with the Global Fund•Is legally responsible for the implementation of the approved proposal•Receives disbursement from the Global Fund’s Trustee •Is responsible for disbursed funds – including funding disbursed to/through Sub-Recipients•Reports on results to the Global Fund (through Local Fund Agent)•Reports on progress to the CCM
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Requirements and Assessment and Scrutiny of PRs1) Capacity Description in the proposal
2) PR Assessment (after proposal approval) Is done by the Local Fund Agent (LFA) Looks into the following areas:
– Financial Management and Systems– Program Management – Sub-recipient Management – Pharmaceutical and Health Product Management and – Monitoring and Evaluation.
3) Conditions Precedent and management actions
4) Progress against agreed programmatic targets and conditions precedents decides upon disbursement
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Multiple Implementer
Dual-Track Financing (DTF)Recommendation that each proposal includes a government
Principal Recipient (PR) and a non government Principal Recipient. If a proposal does not include both government and non-government PRs, it should contain an explanation of the reason
Globally approximately 35% of GF resources are implemented by PRs from the non-government sector- Round 8: 48% of proposals with DTF - Round 9: 41% of proposals with DTF - Round 10: 32% of proposals with DTF
Engagement of local civil society PRs is increasing across all the regions
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 10 September 2011
Performance Experience
Principal Recipient Rating by Sector
Civil Society PRs show very good results!
Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 9 September 2011
Thank you very much.Especially for questions and comments.