Grading and Feedback Work Team
description
Transcript of Grading and Feedback Work Team
Year in Review
Research and implement improved grading practices that provide feedback that clearly communicates student performance related to course goals, standards, and Mission-related outcomes.
Increase parent involvement and communication regarding assessment and assessment results (to begin June 2012)
Review and revise student progress reporting systems to communicate student growth toward Stage 1 desired results and criteria in all courses (including longitudinal rubric development)
Dr. Randy Eikel Terry Martinez Kevin Beckner Martha Leader
Dr. Becky Litherland Nancy Urnes
Bridgett Kovis Beth Knes
Patrick Shelton Dr. Bonnie Maxey
Jason Adams
Districts Nation Wide
Grain Valley School District, Missouri Moraga School District, California
San Diego Public Schools, California Park Hill School District, Missouri
Middleton Public Schools, Rhode Island Littleton Public Schools, Colorado
Montgomery County R-2, Missouri Derry Township School District,
Pennsylvania Santa Barbara Public Schools,
CaliforniaSchool District of Marshfield, Wisconsin
Paramus Public Schools, New JerseyKirkwood School District, Missouri
What is the Purpose of Grading?
What Influences Grades?
Why is Grading Important?
Accurately reflects and informs what students have learned
Continual and ongoing Informs instruction Student self-assessment, reflection and goal setting Removes bias Not punitive Immediate feedback given Consistency Assesses multiple areas separately….academic vs.
behavior All students have an opportunity to learn Support learning
What students have learned relative to standards
Evidence of transfer Multiple measures Accurate data provided Evidence of transfer
Communication about learning Common understanding of standards and
how they are measured Young people are given a sense of
achievement and capable of being successful
Tool for future learning Reflect “all students” learning
Principle #1: Anything that distorts the ability of the grade to accurately communicate student achievement should be excluded from the grade calculation. Example: Zeros, Late work, dishonesty, comparisons to others, extra credit, and behavior.
Principle #2: Academics and Learning Behaviors should be separate in grade calculation.
Principle #3: A grade is best communicated by individual standard.
Principle #4: Grades should reflect:Current level of achievement reality rather than average of performance over time.“Collection” of best evidence regarding student’s achievement of standard.Example: Alternative assessments, professional judgment, retaking assessments.
Grading Summits (beginning next year)
Teacher Feedback Community Feedback Student Feedback
Common VocabularyGrading PracticesBest Assessment PracticesSupport with Report Card
Aligned with Common Core Electronic Developed and rolled out in stages
◦ K-5◦ Middle◦ High School
Or
◦ K-2◦ 3-5◦ Middle ◦ High School
Curriculum Action Teams
Descriptors and definitions for each standard listed on the report card