Future of Financial Planning Gerhardt Meyer, CFP ® Phil Billingham, CFP ® Wessel Oosthuizen, CFP...
-
Upload
oswin-donald-stevenson -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
3
Transcript of Future of Financial Planning Gerhardt Meyer, CFP ® Phil Billingham, CFP ® Wessel Oosthuizen, CFP...
Future of Financial Planning
Gerhardt Meyer, CFP ®Phil Billingham, CFP ®
Wessel Oosthuizen, CFP ®
What we will talk about…real quick
Stuff I told you last time… Was I right..?
New regulatory developments…Around the world and back home…
Some of the themes from RDR and FOFA:•No more commission on investment business•Clients and planners to agree on fees for clearly defined services•Clients to be able to stop paying fees if they aren’t happy with service delivery
so… … was I right last year…?
Indications I might not be wrong…
DRAFT Information Letter re Binder Regulations
Ongoing TCF developments
New stuff coming from down under:
•Proposed a definition for “financial planner”or “financial advisor”
• May not provide financial services or have someone do this on your behalf and use “restricted words”
• Unless: you have a licence to give personal financial advice in respect of certain product categories
•National Entrance Exam•Legislation to govern tax advice and a new regulator in this space•Accountants now need a licence to give financial planning advice (from 1 July)
BIG NEWS!
• Canada– consulting public and industry on:
• should fiduciary standard apply to all? • mutual fund fees too high? ban commission?
• Singapore– various things being considered:
• raising standards• raising CAR
• India– new regulations for “investment advisors”
• define investment advice vs sales function• CAR now required for investment advisors
• FPSB RAP met in Washington during April• Some key things:
– Regulator helps with move from short to long(er) term client relationship
– Professional bodies help with move from caveat emptor to trusted advisor
– Compensation principles:• should not influence product• should not influence advice• client and planner agree on scope of services and compensation for
services which can be reviewed by either party at a later date• access to advice for all• compensation model should support provision of professional advice
The Retail Distribution ReviewWhat is all the fuss about?
•Adviser Charging• Paid by the client – a ‘bottom up’ approach
•Qualifications• ‘Level 4’ – roughly degree level
•Clarity of role• Independent or Restricted• ‘Do what it says on the Tin’
Client PropositionsCan you answer the following questions?
1.What are you for?
2.What do you do?
3.Who do you do it for?
4.Where do you do it?
The rule is:
“If you have never turned away a potential client, you do not have a Client Proposition”
From Adviser to Planner to Business
The key questions are:
•Who pays you?•Who is the client?
• The Actual Person or their Money• A clue – what are you reviewing and reporting on?
•Who is the client a client of?• The Adviser / Planner or the Business?
•Do you have a (very good) job or a business?• A clue – a business owner gets paid twice
Client Focussed - not Adviser Centric
• This does not mean you are not giving good Advice, or great service, or are not Ethical.
• It does mean that the systems and processes in place are there to support the Adviser / Planner, who then looks after the client
• So we need to review:• Culture• Systems
• Client ownership
We need to increase our ProfitsThis is in two parts:
1.Increase income• The 1% world• Get paid for everything you do• Capture more of the value chain• Providers as Partners, not Parents
2.Take out cost1. Process / industrialisation/ standardisation
2. Take out risk
Summary
• Regulation is on a path of Convergence
• There is a clear Business Model at the heart of their thinking
• It is based on existing Best Practice around the world
• When are you going to transition?
THE FUTURE OF THE FINANCIAL PLANNING
PROFESSION
Wessel Oosthuizen CFP®, FPSA®
THE EGG PRINCIPLE
The value of an egg
The value of an egg
Dietary value
Commercial value
Historic value
Esthetic value
THE EGG PRINCIPLE
Current
Historical
FutureWhat is the
financial planner value
proposition?
What is the financial planner
value proposition?
Historical
• Global CFP certification program developed from U.S. model
• Job analyses leading to “topic lists”• Examination syllabus based exclusively on topic lists• Job tasks only used for weighting topics on
examination
Historical – Weaknesses
• Students: “Why do I have to know that”• CFP certificants: “Getting the certification was not a
demonstration of my ability to perform financial planning”
• Employers: “I hire a CFP certificant, who knows a lot, but we still have to teach him how to be a planner”
• Public: “How do I know exactly what a CFP professional can do for me?”
• Internationally: “CFP certification in South Africa doesn’t mean the same as CFP certification in China”
Historical Structure
Client
Current - Global Standards
• Define the practice of financial planning• Distinction between financial planning professionals
and others• Focus on competent practice
How it All Fits Together
FPSB Global
Competency
Profile
InputsFP Process
(Six Steps)
Ethical
Principles
Exam
Education
Experience
Standardsof
Competence
Standardsof
Practice
Standardsof
EthicalBehaviour
Outputs
Professional Financial Planning Standards
Framework
Competency Standards
Competency Profile
Professional Skills
Technical Knowledge
Current Structure
ClientClient ClientClient
*Most Effective*Most Effective
CertificationOngoing
CompetencyRe-
certificationFinancial
PlanExamination FitnessEducation Experience
ASSESSMENT
Body of Knowledge
EQF Level 6 Minimum
1 Year Supervised
-or-
3 Years Un-supervised
Equivalent to 6 Hours/140 Question
Continuing Professional Development
Regulator/Professional Body Roles
Rel
atio
nshi
pS
hort
T
erm
Lon
g T
erm
Caveat Emptor
Trusted Adviser
Old Model Adviser
New Model Adviser
Professional Adviser & CFP Professional as Adviser
CFP Professional
Future Structure
ClientClient
PROFESSIONAL SKILLS
ClientClient
THE FUTURE OF FINANCIAL PLANNING WILL BE ABOUT
Trust Appropriate judgement
Autonomy Initiative
Responsibility Listening Thinking
BehaviourThe interest of the client
AT THE END IT’S NOT ABOUT THE EGG BUT THE CONTENT OF THE EGG
Questions?
@gerhardtmeyer
@PhilBillingham
Wessel in Bloem