FRACP teaching

70
FRACP teaching • Ian Hayes • Clinical Geneticist • NRGS.

description

FRACP teaching. Ian Hayes Clinical Geneticist NRGS. Topics. Interpretation of pedigrees Autosomal dominant (including trinucleotide repeats), recessive, X linked, mitochondrial, imprinting (risk assessment questions). Knowledge about genetics of common adult monogenic disorders. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of FRACP teaching

Page 1: FRACP teaching

FRACP teaching

• Ian Hayes

• Clinical Geneticist

• NRGS.

Page 2: FRACP teaching

Topics

• Interpretation of pedigrees• Autosomal dominant (including trinucleotide repeats), recessive, X

linked, mitochondrial, imprinting (risk assessment questions). • Knowledge about genetics of common adult monogenic disorders.

• When is testing appropriate.• presymptomatic testing (HD, children etc)

• Cancer genetics: breast, bowel cancer, rare genetic tumour syndromes.

• How genetic tests are performed and their interpretation.• Basic science knowledge questions.

Page 3: FRACP teaching

Mechanisms of Genetic Diseases

• Dominant

• Recessive

• X linked

• Trinucleotide repeat diseases

• Mitochondrial Inheritance

• imprinting

• Complex Disease

Page 4: FRACP teaching

Dominant Conditions• Neurofibromatosis (NF2).

• Adult polycystic kidneys (ADPKD)

• BRCA, HNPCC, MEN

• Von Hippel Lindau.

• Tuberous Sclerosis.

• Marfan syndrome, EDS, OI

• HMSN (CMT 1a, HNPP).

• Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Page 5: FRACP teaching

I:1 I:2

II:1 II:2 II:3 II:4 II:7

III:1 III:2 III:3 III:4

II:8 II:9

III:5 III:6

•Vertical Transmission

•Are all offspring affected?

•Does father to son transmission occur

•Are new mutations common?

• Interpretation of pedigrees complicated by somatic mosaicism, reduced penetrance and variable expressivity.

Dominant Pedigrees

Page 6: FRACP teaching

Mechanisms of Dominant Diseases

1. Dominant Negative

Abnormal protein disrupts function of other proteins

Occurs when a gene forms part of a complex

Common with disorders affecting CT

E.G. Marfan syndrome - FBN1 15q21

Collagen disorders - EDS, OI

Page 7: FRACP teaching

Mechanisms of Dominant Diseases

2. First Hit Mutations

A somatic second hit required to develop the condition

Affected individuals inherit a predisposition

Mechanism of many familial cancer syndromes

E.G. Retinoblastoma, MEN, HNPCC, LFM

Page 8: FRACP teaching

Carcinogenesis

First Mutation Second Mutation Third Mutation …

Initiating events:

Tumour Suppresser Genes

Accelerating events: Oncogenes

Page 9: FRACP teaching

Familial Bowel Cancer• Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer

HNPCC: 2-5% of familial CRCModified Amsterdam Criteria

At least 3 relatives with cancer: Colorectal, Endometrial, Small bowel, Ureter / Renal pelvis. Histology Confirmed.

One the 1° relative of the other 2 (2 generations with CRC)

One or more cancers diagnosed before age 50

• Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: 2%• Other Rare Syndromes: Peutz-Jeagar, Hyperplastic

Polyposisis, Cowden syn.

Page 10: FRACP teaching

Bowel Cancer in HNPCC

Amsterdam Criteria

Predominantly Right Sided, Early onset

Mucinous and Poorly differentiated types

Synchronous and Metachronous tumours

Page 11: FRACP teaching

Gene Mutations in HNPCC

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mutations

MSH2MLH1PMS 1 & 2MSH6

Page 12: FRACP teaching
Page 13: FRACP teaching

Question 2000 1 3

• A 45-year-old man develops stage C cancer of the caecum. There is a strong family history of bowel cancer in the absence of polyps and there is no history of colitis.

• The most likely underlying inherited genetic abnormality is in:

• A) the ras gene. • B) the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene. • C) the p-glycoprotein (MDRI) gene. • D) the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. • E) the deleted in colon cancer (DCC) gene.

Page 14: FRACP teaching

Question 1999 1 13

• A 35-year-old man presents with rectal bleeding. He describes the blood as being mixed with the stool. He is otherwise well. His brother was diagnosed with bowel cancer at the age of 38.

• At colonoscopy he was found to have two exophytic tumours, one at the hepatic flexure, the other in the distal transverse colon. The remainder of the colon was normal. Biopsies of both areas showed adenocarcinoma.

• The most likely genetic disorder in this family is: • A) familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP). • B) hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). • C) Gardner's syndrome. • D) Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. • E) a p53 gene mutation.

Page 15: FRACP teaching

Question 2003 2 18

• Hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC or Lynch syndrome) is associated with a number of extracolonic malignancies.

• Which one of the following extra-colonic malignancies is most strongly associated with this diagnosis?

• A) Melanoma.• B) Sarcoma.• C) Leukaemia.• D) Endometrial cancer.• E) Renal cell cancer.

Page 16: FRACP teaching

Question 2001 2 12

• A 40-year-old man had profuse colonic polyposis diagnosed 15 years ago. A clinical diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) had been made. He had a total colectomy. There is no family history of polyposis or colorectal cancer.

• Mutation studies fail to identify a pathogenic mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene in a blood sample.

• The normal DNA result is best explained by: • A) the correct clinical diagnosis being juvenile polyposis. • B) the mutation occurring in a non-coding region of the APC gene. • C) gonadal mosaicism of the APC gene mutation. • D) the causative mutation being in another gene. • E) the APC gene mutation occurring only in cells derived from

adenomatous polyps.

Page 17: FRACP teaching

Question 1999 2 57

• Which one of the following is least likely to be associated with familial colon cancer?

• A)Mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene.

• B)Mutations in DNA repair genes. • C)Chromosomal translocations. • D)Microsatellite instability. • E)Loss of heterozygosity for tumour suppressor

genes.

Page 18: FRACP teaching

Overview of Familial Contribution to Breast Cancer

• 5 % breast cancer due to known genetic factor

• 80% BRCA 1 & 2• Others

– ATM

– E-cadherin1

– TP53

– CHEK2

80% Genetic & other

BRCA1 & 216%

Page 19: FRACP teaching

Age of Onset

Am J Hum Genet. May 2003; 72(5): 1117–1130.

Page 20: FRACP teaching

Non-genetic Risk Factors

risk in general population

• Menarche before 12 yrs • Menopause after 55 yrs• First live birth after

30yrs • Nulliparity• Obesity• Alcohol use• Previous biopsies

• BRCA carriers• Breast feeding for one

year • OC for 3yrs after 30

BRCA1• OC prolonged starting

before 25 • Parity in BRCA2 • HRT post-

oophorectomy incidence of breast ca

Page 21: FRACP teaching

Indicators of a Genetic Cause

• Family History– 3 generations, maternal and paternal sides

– Age of diagnosis: pre-menopausal, particularly under 40 yrs

– Male breast cancer

– Bilateral breast cancer

– Ovarian and breast cancer in the same individual or family line

• Ethnicity

Page 22: FRACP teaching

Question 2004 2 88 A 35-year-old mother with breast cancer reports that her aunt had developed breast cancer at 48 years of

age. She is keen to clarify the risk of her young daughter developing breast cancer. A blood sample from the mother is submitted for mutation analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, but no mutation is found.

What impact does the mutation analysis have on the estimate of the daughter’s risk of developing breast cancer?

A. The maternal studies place the daughter at low risk of developing breast cancer.

B. The maternal studies do not clarify the daughter’s risk. C. The maternal studies place the daughter at high risk of developing breast cancer.

D. The daughter’s risk cannot be clarified without studies of her father’s BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

E. The daughter’s risk cannot be clarified without studies of her own BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

Page 23: FRACP teaching

Question 2001 2 28

• A 35-year-old woman seeks your advice about her risk of developing breast cancer. Which one of the following would place her at greatest risk of developing breast cancer?

• A) Menarche less than 12 years. • B) Birth of first child after the age of 25. • C) Oral contraceptive use for more than 10 years. • D) Sister and aunt diagnosed with breast cancer. • E) Excision of a benign breast lump.

Page 24: FRACP teaching

• There are a number of questions addressing the Knudson two hit hypothesis.

Page 25: FRACP teaching

Question 2002 1 58 • A man is admitted to hospital for surgical

treatment of bilateral vestibular schwannomas (i.e. acoustic neuromas). He has a family history of the disorder and a familial mutation in the NF2 gene has been identified. At operation, samples of blood and tumour tissue are collected for DNA studies. A Southern blot of these samples (with a normal control sample for comparison) is probed with a DNA fragment derived from the NF2 gene. The result is shown in the figure below.

• What is the most likely interpretation of this result?

• A)The mutant NF2 allele has been lost from the patient’s blood.

• B)The mutant NF2 allele has been lost from the patient’s tumour.

• C)The mutant NF2 allele has been duplicated in the patient’s tumour.

• D)The normal NF2 allele has been lost from the patient’s blood.

• E)The normal NF2 allele has been lost from the patient’s tumour.

Page 26: FRACP teaching

Mechanisms of Dominant Diseases

3. Haploinsufficiency

Product of both alleles required for normal function

Occurs in systems with minimal functional reserve

Can also have effects from over expression. Can you think of an example?

Page 27: FRACP teaching

I:1 I:2

II:1 II:2 II:3 II:4 II:5 II:6 II:7 II:8

III:1 III:2 III:3 III:4 III:5 III:6 III:7

IV:1 IV:2 IV:3

•Horizontal Transmission

•Carrier state exists

•Are new mutations common?

•Recurrence risk for siblings = ?%

consanguinity.

Recessive Pedigrees

Page 28: FRACP teaching

II:1Parent

II:2

I:1Grandparent

I:2

II:3Uncle (Aunt)

II:4

III:1Sibling

III:2 III:3

III:4 III:5Affected

III:6

II:5

IV:1Nephew (Niece)

IV:2

V:1

750

III:7First Cousin

Carrier Risk in Extended CF Pedigree

Page 29: FRACP teaching

II:1Parent100%

II:2

100%

I:1Grandparent

1/2

I:2

1/2

II:3Uncle (Aunt)

1/2

II:4

1/2

III:1Sibling 2/3

III:2

1/25

III:3

2/3

III:4

1/25

III:5Affected

100%

III:6

1/25

II:5

1/25

IV:1 IV:2

1/25

V:1

III:7

Carrier Risk in Extended CF Pedigree

Page 30: FRACP teaching

Question 2001 1 64• In the pedigree shown below, the man

indicated by an arrow has been shown to have an autosomal recessive biochemical disorder with complete penetrance. The causative gene has not been identified. His parents are obligate carriers and do not exhibit any biochemical abnormalities. His sister also has normal biochemical studies. The carrier frequency in this population is 10%.

• In the absence of consanguinity, what is the risk of the sister having a child with the biochemical abnormality?

• A) 1 in 40. • B) 1 in 60. • C) 1 in 80. • D) 1 in 100. • E) 1 in 120. •

Page 31: FRACP teaching

Question 2002 2 35 • Approximately 10% of the Caucasian

population has a mutation in the haemochromatosis gene (HFE). Three men in a family (shown below) have been diagnosed with haemochromatosis.

• What is the risk that the woman (indicated by the arrow in the pedigree below) has inherited the genetic predisposition to develop this disorder?

• A)<1%.• B)5%.• C)10%.• D)25%.• E)50%.

Page 32: FRACP teaching

Question 2000 2 51

• The following mutations (Cys282Tyr and His63Asp) are associated with hereditary haemochromatosis. Which one of the following genotypes provides the greatest risk for the development of clinical disease?

• • A) Heterozygous Cys282Tyr. • B) Heterozygous His63Asp. • C) Double-heterozygote for Cys282Tyr and His63Asp. • D) Homozygous Cys282Tyr. • E) Homozygous His63Asp.

Page 33: FRACP teaching

Question 2004 70 c

• In the pedigree shown above, the affected male has a rare autosomal recessive disorder. His niece and nephew have a newborn son (indicated by the arrow).

• What is the chance that the baby will have the same disorder?

• A. 1 in 18. • B. 1 in 32. • C. 1 in 36. • D. 1 in 64. • E. 1 in 128.

Page 34: FRACP teaching

X linked disorders

• Male to male transmission always/sometimes/never occurs

• All daughters of an affected male receive the abnormal gene.

• Unaffected males never transmit the disease to their offspring (of either sex).

• The risks to sons of women who are definite carriers is …..

• 0/.5/all the daughters of carrier women will be carriers themselves.

Page 35: FRACP teaching

I:1 I:2

II:1 II:2 II:3 II:4 II:5 II:6

III:1 III:2III:3

IV:1 IV:2

?III:4

?III:5

?III:6III:7

IV:3 IV:4

Risk in a Haemophilia Pedigree

Page 36: FRACP teaching

Question 2003 1 2 • A woman (indicated by the arrow in the

Figure) seeks your advice about the risk of her unborn child having haemophilia A. Her family history is summarised in the pedigree shown below. The two affected males had presented during the second year of life and had died in their teens. The woman is married to her first cousin.

• What is the risk of her unborn child having haemophilia A?

• A) <1%. • B) 6.25%. • C) 12.5%. • D) 25%. • E) 33%.

Page 37: FRACP teaching

Question 2004 1 24

• In the pedigree shown below, the affected man has an X-linked recessive disorder. A polymorphic DNA marker has been identified close to the mutant gene responsible for this disorder. The genotypes at this marker are given below each symbol in the pedigree. The recombination fraction between the gene and the DNA marker is 10%.

• What is the best estimate of the risk of the woman indicated by the arrow being a carrier of her grandfather’s disorder?

• A. 100%. • B. 90%. • C. 81%. • D. 66%. • E. 10%.•

a,ba

a,b

a,c

c

Page 38: FRACP teaching

Trinucleotide Repeat Diseases

• Result from instability of repeated DNA sequences of three nucleotides

• Instability proportional to length, and in some cases the sex of the transmitting parent.

• The repeat number changes from generation to generation - hence ‘dynamic mutation.’

• Anticipation.

Page 39: FRACP teaching

Trinucleotide Repeat Diseases

Non-Coding TNRs

Fragile X CGG

MD CTG

Friedreich Ataxia GAA

SCA8 CTG

SCA12 CAG

Fragile E GCC

Translated TNRs

HD CAG

SCA1 CAG

SCA2 CAG

SCA3 CAG

SCA6 CAG

SCA7 CAG

SBMA CAG

DRPLA CAG

Page 40: FRACP teaching

Fragile X

• The commonest monogenetic cause of MR

• Unstable CGG repeat in exon1 of FMR

• Phenotype in males with full mutation

but also… Full mut. Females MR

PreMut Females POF

??PreMut Females personality

Premutation males FRAXTAS

Page 41: FRACP teaching

II. Interpreting Fragile X Tests• Full Mutations

– >200 CGG repeats– associated with abnormal methylation

• Pre-mutation– 60 to 200 CGG repeats (?55 - 60)– unstable in transmission

• Intermediate alleles– 40 to 55 CGG repeats– expansions are infrequent and small

Page 42: FRACP teaching

Interpreting Fragile X TestsThe risk of expansion to full mutation is a

function of the repeat size:

In Maternal transmission

Repeat no. Pre : Full

61-70 >3 : 1

71-80 1.25 : 1

81-90 1 : 2

91-100 1 : 4

>100 Always

Page 43: FRACP teaching

I:1 I:2

II:177/29

II:3

?II:4II:5

?III:1

male

III:2 III:3>200

III:4250

III:552

II:6

Page 44: FRACP teaching

Myotonic Dystrophy

• Commonest AD muscular dystrophy.

• Wide variation in features, severity and age of presentation within families.

• Due to TNR expansion involving a CTG repeat in a non-coding region of the DMPK gene 19q13… but ?other genes.

• New mutations rare.

• Unstable in maternal transmission.

• A cause of MR – 50-60% of CDM

Page 45: FRACP teaching

DMPK

…CTGCTGCTGCT…

50 – 2000+

<38NORMAL

Chromosome 19q13

polyA

DMAHPDMWD

5’ 3’

Page 46: FRACP teaching

Interpretation of MD tests.

(45)0 – 101000* – 2000+

Hypotonia, MR, resp.

Congenital

48-5510 – 30100 – 1500

Muscle, heart

Eye, face

Classical

60-N20-7050-150Cataracts

Myotonia

Mild

38-49NilPremutation

DeathOnsetRpts.SymptPhenotype

*may be as low as 750

Page 47: FRACP teaching

Question 2002 2 52 •

A 10-year-old boy (indicated by the arrow in the pedigree below) has been diagnosed with myotonic dystrophy. The diagnosis is confirmed by DNA testing. His mother’s cousin has myotonic dystrophy, but the other surviving relatives have no history suggestive of a myopathy.

• What is the most likely explanation for this pedigree?

• A) Consanguinity.• B) Imprinting.• C )Non-paternity.• D) Incomplete penetrance.• E) Mitochondrial inheritance.•

Page 48: FRACP teaching

Risk of Congenital DM

• Mothers with Mild phenotype have only small risk

• Empirical recurrence risk 20 – 40%

• Maternal repeats <300 10%

>300 59%J Med Genet 1995 32: 105-8

Page 49: FRACP teaching

Treatment• No specific treatment.

• Orthotics and other physical therapies

• Cardiac: baseline and annual ECGs

• Myotonia: phenytoin, carbamazepine

• Cramps: clonazepam, quinine

• Surveillance: opthalmalogical, glucose, TFTs

• Anesthetic risk

Page 50: FRACP teaching

Huntington Disease• Movement, cognitive, psychiatric disorder

• Clinical:Early - coordination, involuntary mvts, planning difficulties,

depression, irritability.

Later - Chorea (90%), Oculomotor disturbance (75%), Hyperrefelxia (90%), Progressive dementia, dysarthria

Psychiatric problems: personality change (75%), affective disorders (20-90%), schizophrenic psychosis (4-12%)

Suicide (12%), Behavioral disturbance esp. outbursts.

End stage- Severe motor disability, mute, dysphagia, incontinent, weight loss, sleep disturbance

Page 51: FRACP teaching

Question

Which one of the following is the most appropriate way to undertake DNA genetic diagnosis of Huntington's disease?

A) RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) analysis.

B) PCR (polymerase chain reaction) analysis. C) Size estimation of a triplet repeat. D) Southern hybridisation. E) Identification of gene-specific mutations.

Page 52: FRACP teaching

Question

• 2002.P2.Question 85 (Clinical Genetics)A young woman is referred by her general practitioner with symptoms of depression and a family history of Huntington disease (HD). Her brother has recently developed abnormal hand and facial movements. She is clinically depressed, but her neurological examination is normal.

• With regard to the acute management of this young woman, mutation analysis of her HD genes is:

A) indicated only if the specific mutation in her brother’s abnormal HD gene has been identified.

B) indicated to differentiate the early psychiatric features of HD from depression.

C) indicated to determine the drug therapy of choice.D) indicated to determine if she would require long-term follow-up.E) not indicated at this stage.

Page 53: FRACP teaching

Question

• 2000.P1.Question 25 (Clinical Genetics)• Which one of the following most accurately reflects the

clinical value of DNA testing for Huntington’s disease? • A) It allows the age of onset to be determined. B) It allows investigation of an individual presenting with

tremor. C) It allows young children to be tested. D) It allows an at risk individual to be tested before clinical

features develop. E) It requires only a sample of blood.

Page 54: FRACP teaching

Imprinting• Certain genes retain a ‘memory’ of

which parent they were inherited from.

• Behave differently when inherited from either mother or father

• About 200 imprinted genes

• Methylation appears to be the principle mechanism

• Important also in some cancers

Page 55: FRACP teaching
Page 56: FRACP teaching

Imprinting• Common example:

Prader-Willi Syn / Angelmans Syn

Hypotonia Coarse features

Poor feeding… Ataxia

…food obssesion Jerky movement

growth retarded seizures

MR MR

• Both are due to mutations in chromosome 15q11-q13

Page 57: FRACP teaching
Page 58: FRACP teaching

Frequency of genetic cause PWS AS Rec risk

Del 15q 70 70 <1a

UPD 25-28(mat) 3-5(pat) <1a

IC 2-5 2-5 50b

Transl <1 <1 5-50b

Gene 0? 10-15 50

Unknown 0? ~10 ?

a= not yet reported b=depends on parent of origin

Page 59: FRACP teaching
Page 60: FRACP teaching
Page 61: FRACP teaching
Page 62: FRACP teaching
Page 63: FRACP teaching

Mitochondrial Diseases

• Mitochondria: energy producing organelles

Genome - 16569 bp, circular, intron-less

1000s copies heteroplasmy

13 proteins + tRNAs

Dependent on genomic proteins

• Matrilineal Inheritance

Page 64: FRACP teaching

I:1

?

I:2

II:1 II:2 II:3 II:4 II:6 II:7

?

II:8

III:1 III:3 III:4 III:5

?

III:6

IV:1

II:5

III:7

IV:2

III:8

IV:3

III:9

IV:4 IV:5

Matrilineal Inheritance

Page 65: FRACP teaching
Page 66: FRACP teaching

Syndromes / Symptoms

MELAS

MERRF

Lebers HON

Kearns-Sayre

Non-synd deafness

DM

Visual Loss

PEO

Myopathy (RRF)

Encephalopthy

Epilepsy

Diabetes

Lactic acidosis

Deafness

Cytopenias

Page 67: FRACP teaching
Page 68: FRACP teaching
Page 69: FRACP teaching

Question

What is the most likely mode of inheritance?

Mitochondrial. X-linked.

Autosomal dominant. Autosomal recessive.

Polygenic.

Page 70: FRACP teaching

Question 1999 52

• In the pedigree shown, individuals marked with an X have a rare genetic disorder. Those marked with an N are clinically normal. Those with a slash are deceased and the remaining family members have not been examined clinically.

• From the pedigree which one of the following is the most likely mode of genetic inheritance?

• A)Autosomal recessive. • B)Autosomal dominant. • C)X-linked. • D)Mitochondrial. • E)Epigenetic.