Forming Physician Multispecialty Practices: Key Legal...
Transcript of Forming Physician Multispecialty Practices: Key Legal...
Presenting a live 90‐minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Forming Physician Multispecialty Forming Physician Multispecialty Group Practices: Key Legal ConsiderationsEvaluating Compensation Models, Negotiating Business Contracts, and Complying With Federal and State Laws
T d ’ f l f
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2011
Today’s faculty features:
Adam J. Rogers, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, Miami, Fla.
William L. Weiner, Partner, Duane Morris, Cherry Hill, N.J.
Wallis S. Stromberg, Of Counsel, Davis Graham & Stubbs, Denver
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
Conference Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps:
• Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-hand column on your screen hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps:
• Close the notification box
• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location
• Click the SEND button beside the box
Tips for Optimal Quality
S d Q litSound QualityIf you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-869-6667 and enter your PIN when prompted Otherwise please send us a chat or e mail when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing QualityTo maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key againpress the F11 key again.
Forming Physician Multispecialty Group Practices: Key Legal ConsiderationsPractices: Key Legal Considerations
Strafford WebinarSeptember 8, 2011
Adam J. Rogers, Esq.McDermott Will & Emery LLP
www.mwe.com
Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf London Los Angeles Miami Munich New York Orange County Rome San Diego Silicon Valley Washington, D.C.
© 2007 McDermott Will & Emery LLP. McDermott operates its practice through separate legal entities in each of the countries where it has offices.
Overview
Group Formation Considerations
Adding Physicians/Practices Through Mergers and AcquisitionsAdding Physicians/Practices Through Mergers and Acquisitions
Compensation Models and Regulatory Concerns
Hospital, Private Equity and Other Non-Physician Participation
Q & A
6
Group Formation ConsiderationsSample of Reasons For Forming or Joining a Physician Multispecialty Group Practice
– Ancillary Services – Bargaining Power– Synergies Between or Among Certain Specialties– “Diversified Portfolio”– Platform Ready-Made for Health Reform and Move Toward y
Integrated Care (e.g. ACOs)
7
Group Formation Considerations (Cont.) Preliminary Considerations
– Partners, Specialties, Level of Integration (e.g., Single Integrated Practice versus a “Group Without Walls”)
Choice of Entity Choice of Entity– Corporate Practice Limitations – Business Considerations
Tax Issues– Initial Election– Transaction Considerations
• “Begin With The End In Mind”
Governing Documents Governing Documents
Benefits Issues
EHR
8
EHR
Physician Multispecialty Group Practices: Key Legal Considerations
September 8, 2011
Wallis S. Stromberg, Esq.
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
Compensation Systems f M lti S i ltfor Multi-Specialty
Groups
• Purpose of a compensation system is to incentivize behavior and reward desired performance
• It’s hard to keep physicians happy in a single-specialty group – multi-specialty groups just add more complicationscomplications– The more diverse the specialties, the more the complexity
• Variations in reimbursement or payment– Procedures vs. Cognitive (E&M)– Payer and patient mix can have wide variations– Capitation and cost-saving programs cause divergent interestsCapitation and cost saving programs cause divergent interests
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
10
Compensation Systems f M lti S i ltfor Multi-Specialty
Groups, cont’d
• Variations in consumption of resources
– Overhead needs are different for primary care office-based specialists and proceduralists
– Overhead needs can be inverse of reimbursement levels– Overhead needs can be inverse of reimbursement levels
– Subsidizing others’ incomes
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
11
Common Factors Looked t i C tiat in Compensation
Systems
• Industry surveys of compensation and work RVU’s (wRVU’s) by specialty
• Historic production• Equality of effect and participation• Personal productivity and incentives• Overhead allocations
Quality/Outcome measures• Quality/Outcome measures• Citizenship• Ancillary ServicesAncillary Services
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
12
Stark Rules for Ph i i GPhysician Group
Practices
Generally:• Overhead expenses of and income from the practice must be• Overhead expenses of and income from the practice must be
distributed pursuant to a prospective methodology• Centralized decision-making on budget, compensation and
l isalaries• Location and specialty based compensation are permitted for
non-DHS revenues• No physician may be compensated in any manner that is
based, directly or indirectly on the volume or value of his or her referralsreferrals
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
13
Stark Rules for Ph i i GPhysician Group Practices, cont’d
• A physician may be paid a share of the practice’s overall profits from DHSprofits from DHS
• A physician may be paid a productivity bonus for services personally performed or for services incident to personally performed servicesperformed services
• So long as the bonus or share is not determined in any manner that is directly related to the volume or value of the physician’s referrals for DHS
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
14
O ll P fitOverall Profits
• The Group’s total profits from DHSor
• The profits from DHS from any component of the group that consists of at least 5 physicians
• Must be a verifiable and reasonable methodology for the division that is not related to the volume or value of DHS referrals
• Three “safe harbors”(1) A per capita division of profits(2) Proportionate to Group’s revenue that is not from DHS payable by either a(2) Proportionate to Group s revenue that is not from DHS payable by either a
federal program or a private payer(3) Revenues from DHS are less than 5% of Group’s total revenue and each
physician’s allocation is less than 5% of his or her total compensation
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
15
P d ti it BProductivity Bonus
• Personal services or services incident to the physician’s services
• Calculated using a reasonable and verifiable• Calculated using a reasonable and verifiable methodology not related to the volume or value of DHS referrals
• 3 “safe harbors”(1) RVU based or by patient encounters(2) allocated by compensation from services that are not DHS payable(2) allocated by compensation from services that are not DHS payable
by a federal program or private payer(3) Revenues from DHS are less than 5% of Group’s total revenues
and each physician’s allocation is less than 5% of his/her total p ycompensation
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
16
Examples of Compensation SystemsCompensation Systems
for Multi-Specialty Practices
• Fixed salaries• Eliminates uncertainty for physician
• Puts all risk on group for overhead, insufficientPuts all risk on group for overhead, insufficient production or reduced reimbursement
• Have to have periodic recalculation, based on p ,actual revenues or productivity
• More common in very large groupsy g g p
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
17
Examples of Compensation SystemsCompensation Systems
for Multi-Specialty Practices, cont’d
• Classic “Eat What You Kill” compensation• Collected revenues for physician’s services less
allocated overhead• Methodology of allocating overhead becomes the focus• Methodology of allocating overhead becomes the focus
• Fixed vs. variable• Per capital divisionp• Productivity division
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
18
Examples ofExamples of Compensation Systems
• Base salary with productivity incentiveM t h f lti i lt• Most common approach for multi-specialty groups
• Base salary derived from historic revenue production or compensation surveysproduction or compensation surveys
• Median to 60th Percentile as base
• Incentive calculated from production in excess of th t d d d f th b lthe standards used for the base salary
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
19
Examples of C tiCompensation
Systems, cont’d
• Equality: “Everyone Contributes”• Some Groups will set aside a portion of revenue forSome Groups will set aside a portion of revenue for
equal division• Probably only minority
• Ancillary services profits• Surveys have indicated that most multi-specialty groups
use profit from ancillaries to lower general overheaduse profit from ancillaries to lower general overhead, and do not use as individual compensation
• “Incident to” ancillaries can be key piece of some specialists’ compensation (e g drug infusion profits)specialists compensation (e.g., drug infusion profits)
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
20
P d ti it MProductivity Measures
• Collections: all the bad incentives of FFS PaymentsFFS Payments
• wRVU’s:• Generally seen as fair among specialties, but
somewhat arbitrary
• Still subject to negotiation on dollars
• Not necessarily representative of the Group’s goals f i ti d ffor incentives and performance
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
21
Productivity Measures,Productivity Measures, cont’d
• Quality/Outcomes• Set targets and reward physicians
• Pool set aside for this (2-7%), percent of salary or assign wRVU’swRVU s
• Minority of Groups have used this measure in compensation system, though growing number adopting
• Outreach/Leadership• Stipends for participation or assign wRVU’s
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
22
N P f t S tNo Perfect System
• Every Group will have own solution• Need to review on regular basis• Hospital employment of physicians is bringing new
creativity to the problem• Doctors usually have no easy exit and little control so want• Doctors usually have no easy exit and little control, so want
better system• Incorporating concepts from Medical Directorships and Co-
Management into compensation planManagement into compensation plan• Assigning value to the management contributions doctors
bring to the table when full-time employees
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
23
Pl i f F tPlanning for Future
• ACO’s: “shared savings” probably not enough incentive to change behavior or compensationincentive to change behavior or compensation systems
• Risk sharing through global payments or capitation from private payers or government will force Groups to rethink compensationwill force Groups to rethink compensation
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
24
C t t I f tiContact Information
Wallis S. Stromberg, Esq.
ll t b @d [email protected](303) 892-7478
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP1550 Seventeenth Street, Suite 500
Denver, Colorado 80202-1500
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP | www.dgslaw.com
25
FORMING PHYSICIAN MULTISPECIALTY GROUP PRACTICES:
KEY LEGAL CONSIDERATIONSThursday, September 8, 2011
William L. Weiner
www.duanemorris.com
©2011 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris – Firm and Affiliate Offices | New York | London | Singapore | Los Angeles | Chicago | Houston | Hanoi | Philadelphia | San Diego | San Francisco | Baltimore | Boston | Washington, D.C.
Las Vegas | Atlanta | Miami | Pittsburgh | Newark | Boca Raton | Wilmington | Cherry Hill | Princeton | Lake Tahoe | Ho Chi Minh City | Duane Morris LLP – A Delaware limited liability partnership
Addi Ph i i Th hAdding Physicians Through Mergers and Acquisitionsg q
www.duanemorris.com27
Determining Purchase Price
• Typically, no consideration paid to h i i / ti th t j i b t i t fphysicians/practices that join, but in event of
departures, buy/sell provisions shall control Wh t i th l f d ti h i i ’• What is the value of a departing physician’s ownership interest?
( ) (• Various (re)purchase price methodologies (is goodwill included ?)
www.duanemorris.com28
Determining Purchase Price(Cont’d) ( )
– Fixed pricep– Book value (plus goodwill as a percentage of
collections?)– Appraised value– Interest in specific assets
Prior compensation– Prior compensation
www.duanemorris.com29
Determining The Purchase Price: (Cont’d) ( )
• Which of the above is most acceptable to i h i i ?merging physicians?
• Determine length of payout– Typically, 3-5 years, with downpayment, monthly
installments, and interest– Group may obtain life insurance to fund purchase price– Group may obtain life insurance to fund purchase price
in event of departure due to death– Payments cease in event of competition following
www.duanemorris.com
departure
30
What Are The Key Deal Terms/Issues?
• Partial retirement• Confidentiality/letter of intentConfidentiality/letter of intent
– “No shop” clause
• Name• Name• Governance/management
Board of directors– Board of directors– Practice management vs. clinical decisions
• Equity interests/voting rights
www.duanemorris.com
• Equity interests/voting rights
31
What Are The Key Deal Terms/Issues? (Cont’d)( )• Compensation – different models
– Fixed salary– Salary and bonus– Individual collections and pro rata share of overhead– Individual collections minus equal share of fixed
expenses and pro rata share of variable expensesIndividual collections minus equal share of fixed– Individual collections minus equal share of fixed expenses less pro rata share of variable expenses less direct expenses
www.duanemorris.com
– Equal share32
What Are The Key Deal Terms/Issues?(Cont’d)( )
• Financial models?– What will the new group look like?
– Ancillary services – sharing of revenue/expenses
P l• Personnel– Reducing/compensating staff
Single administrator– Single administrator– Employee benefits/policies
www.duanemorris.com33
What Are The Key Deal Terms/Issues?(Cont’d)( )
• Joint billing and collection activities– Need for integration– Centralized billing and collections, including location,
staffing and network computerized billing system withstaffing and network computerized billing system with other offices
• Contributions of accounts receivable/accountsContributions of accounts receivable/accounts payable
www.duanemorris.com34
What Are The Key Deal Terms/Issues?(Cont’d)( )
• Other operational issues – New provider numbers– Notification of third party payers
M l ti i– Malpractice carrier– Electronic medical records system
www.duanemorris.com35
What Are The Key Deal Terms/Issues?(Cont’d)( )
• Bailout provisions– Pros and cons– Used to gain support, but can discourage cooperation
and compromiseand compromise– May wish to include length of term to exercise penalty-
free bailout
• Restrictive covenants
www.duanemorris.com36
Physician Employment Contract –Salient Issues• Initial term/renewal
Probationary period?– Probationary period?
• Scope of dutiesCall coverage– Call coverage
– Administrative duties
• Compensation• Compensation– Fair market value of entire compensation package,
including benefits, demonstrating reasonable
www.duanemorris.com
g , gcompensation
37
Physician Employment Contract –Salient Issues (Cont’d)( )
• Vacation and sick leave/CME credits• Professional liability insurance
– Type and amount to be paid
• Right to fees• Managed care agreements• Patient records
– Post-termination access
www.duanemorris.com38
Physician Employment Contract –Salient Issues (Cont’d)( )
• Reps and warranties– Pre-employment liabilities– Pre-employment liabilities
• Reporting obligations• Termination• Termination
– For cause– Without cause– Without cause– Upon death or disability
• Non-competition/non-solicitation/non-
www.duanemorris.com
Non competition/non solicitation/nondisparagement
39
Promoting Associates To Partners –Equity Statusq y
• Typically, employment arrangements with h i i d ti i t d d t l d tphysician-owned practices intended to lead to
partnership/ownership in exchange for building patient basepatient base– Provide for regular performance reviews (annually or
semi-annually)se a ua y)– Provide for time period prior to end of employment term
that physician shall be notified as to whether he or she h ll b ff d it t k
www.duanemorris.com
shall be offered equity stake
40
Promoting Associates To Partners –Equity Status (Cont’d)q y ( )
– Employment agreement may provide for percentage of it t k if ff d b t tequity stake, if offered, but no guarantee.
– Due to ever-changing and unpredictable practice environment do not include formula for calculatingenvironment, do not include formula for calculating buy-in price
• Ramifications of buy-in pricey p– Affects entire practice, not just physician’s employment
www.duanemorris.com41
Promoting Associates To Partners –Equity Status (Cont’d)q y ( )
– If practice makes money from physician’s period of employment, buy-in price might be lower, but if practice’s net return is low, buy-in price may be higherIf physician negotiates lower buy in price buy out price– If physician negotiates lower buy-in price, buy-out price for retiring physicians may be affected – could cause resentment among senior physicians ready to retire
– Could also affect future capital obligations of group by reducing reserve needed to buy out retiring partners
www.duanemorris.com42
WILLIAM L WEINERWILLIAM L. WEINERPartnerDuane Morris LLPS it 200Suite 2001940 Route 70 EastCherry Hill, NJ 08003USAUSA
Phone: +1 856 874 4212F 1 609 228 5930Fax: +1 609 228 5930Email: [email protected]
www.duanemorris.com43
Forming Physician Multispecialty Group Practices: Key Legal ConsiderationsPractices: Key Legal Considerations
Strafford WebinarSeptember 8, 2011
Adam J. Rogers, Esq.McDermott Will & Emery LLP
www.mwe.com
Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf London Los Angeles Miami Munich New York Orange County Rome San Diego Silicon Valley Washington, D.C.
© 2007 McDermott Will & Emery LLP. McDermott operates its practice through separate legal entities in each of the countries where it has offices.
H it l P i t E it d Oth NHospital, Private Equity and Other Non-Physician ParticipationConfluence of Events Have Led to a Surge in Healthcare Investments and M&A Generally
Multispecialty Group Practices Can Position Themselves Well as the Landscape of Healthcare Changes
– State of the (U.S. Healthcare) Union:I 2009 T t l H lth E dit R h d $2 5 T illi Whi h T l t t• In 2009 Total Health Expenditures Reached $2.5 Trillion, Which Translates to 17.6 Percent of the Nation's Gross Domestic Product*
• According to a June 2010 Commonwealth Fund Report, Americans Spend Twice as Much as Residents of Other Developed Countries on Healthcare, but Get Lower Quality and Less EfficiencyGet Lower Quality and Less Efficiency
– Providers Will Be Asked to “Do More With Less”– Multispecialty Physician Practices and Their Investors Can Benefit from
Shift Toward Greater Clinical Integration
45
*http://www.cms.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/02_NationalHealthAccountsHistorical.asp#TopOfPage
H it l P i t E it d Oth NHospital, Private Equity and Other Non-Physician Participation (Cont.)Hospitals
– Currently, the Most Active Player in Multispecialty Physician Practice Mergers, Acquisitions and Affiliations/Investments
– Not Limited to For Profit Hospitals/Systems– Not Limited to For Profit Hospitals/Systems– Potential Antitrust Issues
Private Equity– Physician Practice Investments Have Generally Been Focused on
Hospital (or Facility)-Based Physicians (e.g., Anesthesia, Radiology, Hospitalists)
– Focus on Healthcare Increasing and Uptick in Hospital Investment Will E I t t M P ti A i iti d O t itiExpose Investors to More Practice Acquisitions and Opportunities
Other Investors
46
R l t B i t N Ph i iRegulatory Barriers to Non-Physician ParticipationCorporate Practice of Medicine
– Most States Still Have Laws Prohibiting, to Varying Degrees, the “Corporate Practice of Medicine” (“CPOM”)Practice of Medicine ( CPOM )
– CPOM States Generally Prevent Unlicensed Lay Entities from Employing Physicians or Otherwise Contracting with Physicians to Furnish Medical Care
– CPOM Laws May Limit the Flexibility of Physicians and Non-Physicians to St t O hi d E l t A tStructure Ownership and Employment Arrangements
Some States with Strong CPOM Laws (e.g., California, Nevada, and Texas) Even Prohibit Hospitals from Employing Physicians, but HaveTexas) Even Prohibit Hospitals from Employing Physicians, but Have Laws Permitting Nonprofit “medical foundations” to Engage Physicians (e.g., Through Their Existing Medical Group) Indirectly to Provide Medical Care
47
R l t B i t N Ph i iRegulatory Barriers to Non-Physician Participation (Cont.) Fee-Splitting
– Typically Defined to Include Unearned Division of Professional Medical Fee with Layperson/Lay Entity and/or Payment for Referrals
– Some States Without CPOM Prohibition Still Have Fee-Splitting Limitations that Can be Triggered by Certain Non-Physician Participation Models (e.g. Florida)D t ti f F i M k t V l f S i i K– Documentation of Fair Market Value of Services is Key
Others
Investments and Business Models in States with These Barriers Will Require Careful Regulatory Analysis to Minimize Regulatory Risk
48
Management Model
Non-Physician Investor(s)
Friendly Physician1
100% ownershipLong-Term Management
Services Contract (“MSC”) 2
Management Multispecialty
100% ownership
Fair Market Value Management Fee
Management Company Physician
Practice3
1 Physician licensed in applicable state, generally will enter into a stock transfer restriction agreement (or have same incorporated into MSC), but stock transfer restrictions are prohibited in some jurisdictions (e.g., New York)2 Management Company is typically either the former practice entity (and medical assets are spun out into new practice entity), which is acquired by the non-physician investor(s) or is a NEWCO that acquires the non-medical assets It then provides the Mutlispecialty Physician Practice with use of those assets
49
physician investor(s) or is a NEWCO that acquires the non medical assets. It then provides the Mutlispecialty Physician Practice with use of those assets (typically including real estate – whether owner or leased) and turnkey management and administrative services 3 Has provider number(s), payor contracts, employs and/or contracts with physicians
Management Model (Cont.)
Management Agreement Terms are Key to Success of Arrangement
ProsPros– In CPOM States, Allows for Non-Physician “Ownership” of Practice– Subsequent Transactions at Management Company Level Have Minimal
Impact on PracticeImpact on Practice
ConsRisks of Friendly Physician– Risks of Friendly Physician
– Can Be Limitations On Management Fees
50
E l f Di t P ti A i itiExample of Direct Practice Acquisition (Asset Deal)
Health Care System
Hospital HAPGMultispecialty
Physician Practice
FMV Purchase Price
p Physician PracticeAssets
EmployeesPhysicians Become Employees of Hospital Affiliated Physician Group
51
Physician Group
E l f Di t P ti A i itiExample of Direct Practice Acquisition (Asset Deal) (Cont.)
Asset Purchase– Physician Employee Model
– Foundation Model
Stock PurchaseStock Purchase
Mergerg
52
Foundation Model
Affiliated Hospital
100% Membership
Medical FoundationThird Party Managed Care
PSA
Medical Foundation PayorsContracts
PSA PSA
Multispecialty Group
P ti
Group Practice
Group Practice
53
Practice PracticePractice
Foundation Model (Cont.)
Pros:– Physician Practices (and Physicians) Retain Their Provider Numbers and
the Practice Retains its Relationships with Owners and Physicians– The Foundation Bills for the Professional Services and Compensates the
Physician Practice Pursuant to An Agreed Upon FormulaCons:
– It May Be More Difficult for the Practice to Return to the “status quo,” as Certain Third-Party Payor Contracts and Provider Numbers May Expire
– Integration is Not as Complete as with Regard to Other Joint Venture or Employment Models
54
Question and Answers
55