Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis,...
-
Upload
austin-greene -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis,...
![Page 1: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514cc6a550346935c8b4bed/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Flowgate Allocation Method
Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL
Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010
![Page 2: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514cc6a550346935c8b4bed/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL – Problem Statement
• Provide equal treatment of FIRM Point-to-Point (PTP) Transaction impacts and FIRM Generation-to-Load (GTL) Impacts during a TLR event– Flowgate allocation does not “downgrade” FIRM PTP and GTL transactions to NON-FIRM– TLR curtailment of FIRM contributions requires the issuance of a TLR-5 or higher– FIRM contributions are NOT curtailed in TLR-3a, TLR-3b and TLR-4
• Allocations are based on forecasted/reserved (Expected) FIRM usage of flowgates up to but not exceeding the flowgate limit– Expected FIRM usage is determined in the Day-Ahead and Hour-Ahead– All Expected FIRM contributions to the flow on the flowgate are included– The total Expected FIRM contributions does not exceed the flowgate limit:
• BAs and TSPs are allocated FIRM limits to their contribution on the flowgate that equals its total Expected FIRM contributions
– The total Expected FIRM contributions exceeds the flowgate limit:• BAs and TSPs are allocated FIRM limits to their contribution on the flowgate proportional to their
contribution• FIRM contributions are placed in two curtailment buckets – LAST TO CUT (LTC) and FIRST TO CUT
(FTC)– Nomenclature:
• PTP transactions: FTC = 7-F LTC = 7-FC• GTL: FTC = 7-FN LTC = 7-FCN
– FIRM contributions in FTC and LTC are determined in real-time based on current system conditions
– LTC: FIRM contributions in the LTC bucket are those that do NOT exceed the Expected FIRM usage of the flowgate for FIRM PTP and GTL impacts
– FTC: FIRM contributions in the FTC bucket are those that exceed the Expected FIRM usage of the flowgate for FIRM PTP and GTL impacts
![Page 3: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514cc6a550346935c8b4bed/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL - Example
• Flowgate limit: 800 MW• Allocation:
– All Firm PTP transactions– Firm GTL up-to flowgate limit
• Total Firm PTP allocation: 520 MW• Total Firm GTL allocation: 800 – 520 = 280 MW• GTL allocation ratio: 280 / 480 = 0.583
– GTL allocation = (Firm GTL Impact ) x (GTL allocation ratio)
Entity DA/HA Firm GTL Impact
DA/HA Firm PTP Impact
Firm PTP Allocation
(1)
Firm GTL Allocation
(2)
Firm Allocation
(1)+(2)
A 0 150 150 0 150
B 160 120 120 93.3 213.3
C 160 0 0 93.3 93.3
D 120 200 200 70 270
E 40 50 50 23.3 73.3
Total 480 520 520 280 800
1,000 800
![Page 4: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514cc6a550346935c8b4bed/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL - Example
• Flowgate limit: 800 MW
Entity Firm Allocation
(1)
RT Firm GTL Impact
(2)
RT Firm PTP Impact
(3)
Total Firm Impact
(4)=(2)+(3)
Over/(Under) Allocation (5)=(3)-(1)
Last to Cut 7F+7FN
(6)=Min(1,4)
First to Cut 7FC+7FCN(7)=(4)-(6)
7FCN FTC GTL
(7)x(2)/(4)
7FCFTC PTP
(7)x(3)/(4)
A 150 0 160 160 10 150 10 0 10
B 213.3 120 80 200 (13.3) 200 0 0 0
C 93.3 80 0 80 (13.3) 80 0 0 0
D 270 80 190 270 0 270 0 0 0
E 73.3 30 50 80 6.7 73.3 6.7 2.5 4.2
Total 800 310 480 790 (10) 773.3 16.7 2.5 14.2
![Page 5: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514cc6a550346935c8b4bed/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
FTC and LTC Calculations• TLR 5a requires curtailment of 10 MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all
NON-FIRM curtailments– 10 MW of relief will be provided pro-rata from 16.7 MW of FTC (7-FC and 7-FCN),
using the existing TLR pro-rata formulas• Total 7FCN Curtailment: 2.5x10/16.7 = 1.5 MW• Total 7FC Curtailment: 14.2x10/16.7 = 8.5 MW• Individual 7FC curtailment: 8.5 MW distributed pro-rata among all 7FC transactions
– 773.3 MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN) are not curtailed
Entity Last to Cut 7F+7FN
7FCN FTC GTL
7FCFTC PTP
7FCN Curtailment
7FC Curtailment (*)
7F+7FN Curtailment
A 150 0 10 0 10x10/16.7 = 6.0 0
B 200 0 0 0 0 0
C 80 0 0 0 0 0
D 270 0 0 0 0 0
E 73.3 2.5 4.2 10x2.5/16.7 = 1.5 10x4.2/16.7 = 2.5 0
Total 773.3 2.5 14.2 1.5 8.5 0
(*) Assumes all PTP transactions with the same TDF
![Page 6: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514cc6a550346935c8b4bed/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over-Allocated GTL/PTP – Issues To Be Resolved
• Sum of all LTC (7-F and 7-FN) in Real-Time can be smaller than the flowgate limit– Only the over-allocated entities/transactions are “penalized” for over-
allocating• Remaining of flowgate limit can be reassigned to over-
allocated entities/transactions so that LTC equals the flowgate limit– Reduces the FTC bucket size– Distribution Proportion Options:
• FIRM limits of over-allocated entities/transactions• Real-Time over-allocation impact• Real-Time impacts• Other
– If TLR-5 cannot be resolved with curtailments from FTC bucket, may need to curtail pro-rata the LTC bucket• Entities/Transaction that do not over-allocate may be curtailed (see next
examples)
![Page 7: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514cc6a550346935c8b4bed/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
FTC and LTC Calculations with Reassignment• Total RT Impact < Flowgate limit
– Reassign all FTC to LTC
• TLR 5a requires curtailment of 10 MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all NON-FIRM curtailments– 10 MW of relief will be provided pro-rata from 790 MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN), using
the existing TLR pro-rata formulas– All impacting GTL and PTP are curtailed, even for entities where RT firm GTL and PTP
are below the allocation
Entity Last to Cut 7F+7FN
7FCN FTC GTL
7FCFTC PTP
Reassigned LTC 7F+7FN
7F+7FN Curtailment
A 150 0 10 160
Pro-rata between firm GTL and PTP
for all entities
B 200 0 0 200
C 80 0 0 80
D 270 0 0 270
E 73.3 2.5 4.2 80
Total 773.3 2.5 14.2 790 10