Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

download Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

of 52

Transcript of Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    1/146

    Acad Year(14/15)

    PROJECT

     NO.

    (B004)

    MEAN QUEUE TIME STUDY FOR THE LU-KUMAR

    NETWORK  

    ME

    ANQUEUETIM

    E

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    2/146

    E

    MEAN QUEUE TIME STUDY FOR THE LU-KUMAR NETWORK  

    SUBMITTED

    BY

     NYAN SOE LYNN

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    3/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    Table of Contents 

    Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... i 

    ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ iv 

    ACKNOWLWDGEMENTS .................................................................................................... v 

    Table of Figures ...................................................................................................................... vi 

    List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... vii 

    CHAPTER 1  INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 

    1.1  Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 

    1.2  Objectives ................................................................................................................. 1 

    1.3  Scope of Work ......................................................................................................... 2 

    1.4  Organization ............................................................................................................. 3 

    CHAPTER 2  LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................ 4 

    2 1 Q i h 4

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    4/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    CHAPTER 3  METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 9 

    3.1  Stability region of the Lu-Kumar network ............................................................... 9 

    3.1.1  Development of Simulation model .................................................................. 9 

    3.1.2  Parameter of the simulation model, deterministic case .................................. 18 

    3.1.3  Manual book-keeping ..................................................................................... 19 

    3.1.4  Parameters of the simulation model, uniform distribution arrival time ........ 19 

    3.2  Stability, Instability and their relationship ............................................................. 20 

    3.2.1  Design of Experiment for the Lu-Kumar network started with single inter-

    arrival time of 0.9 ........................................................................................................... 20 

    3.2.2  Design of Experiment for the Lu-Kumar network started with double inter-

    arrival time of 0.9 ........................................................................................................... 21 

    3.3  Virtual Stations in the Lu-Kumar Network ............................................................ 22 

    3.3.1  Development of Simulation model ................................................................ 22 

    3.3.2  Parameters of the simulation model ............................................................... 22 

    3 3 3 P t f i t l t ti 22

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    5/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    4.4.1  Relationship between virtual stations and MM1 queue ............................... 101 

    4.5  Merged Queue at Service Centre B of the Lu-Kumar network ............................ 104 

    CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION ........................................... 106 

    5.1  CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 106 

    5.1.1  Stability Region of the Lu-Kumar network .................................................. 106 

    5.1.2  Stability, Instability and their relationship of the Lu-Kumar network ......... 106 

    5.1.3  Virtual Stations in the Lu-Kumar network ................................................... 107 

    5.1.4  Merged Queue at Service Centre B of the Lu-Kumar network .................... 107 

    5.2  LEARNING ......................................................................................................... 107 

    5.3  RECOMMENDATION FOR FUTURE WORK ................................................. 107 

    5.3.1  Stability, Instability and their relationship of the Lu-Kumar network ......... 107 

    5.3.2  Virtual Stations in the Lu-Kumar network ................................................... 108 

    5.3.3  Merged Queue at Service Centre B of the Lu-Kumar network .................... 108 

    REFRENCES ....................................................................................................................... 109 

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    6/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

     ABSTRACT

    Manufacturing system, communication network, silicon wafer manufacturing plant, internet

    service provider domain and freeway system are usually modelled with multi-class queuing

    network. The aim of this project is to deeply understand the nature of the Lu-Kumar

    network. The queue time of the Lu-Kumar network is hard to predict due to the mutual

     blocking of virtual stations in the network.

    In most of the literature, the stability of a network is discussed using a fluid model. But in

    this project, the stability of a network is investigated by mean of manual book-keeping as

    well as simulation model with deterministic inter-arrival time and service time. The

    condition, for which the network will come back to the stable state when there is a small

    disturbance at an initial state, is also examined.

    To understand the nature of virtual stations in a network, the network is simulated with

    MatEvent simulation model in which Poisson distribution is used for inter-arrival time and

    Exponential distribution is used for service times. Moreover, two buffers at service centre B

    of the Lu-Kumar network are merged into one queue to understand the blocking nature of the

    network and the queue time is compared with MM1 queue time.

    From the book-keeping and simulation result, it is found that the stability region of the

    d t i i ti L K t k i di t It i b t 1 5 ti f ti j b

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    7/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

     ACKNOWLWDGEMENTS

    The author would like to extend his gratitude to individuals who have helped and supported

    throughout this project.

    Firstly, the author would like to express deep appreciation towards Assistant Professor Wu

    Kan for his guidance, patience, support, encouragement and willingness to teach and share

    the valuable insight from his research and experience.

    Secondly, the author also would like to thank the research fellow, Dr. Daniel David

    Moskovich for his guidance and assistance towards clearing the doubts regarding with the

    Lu-Kumar network and book-keeping.

    Thirdly, the author would like to thank his peer, Cheung Wai Lun for his assistance and

    helpful discussion over this project.

    Last, but not least, the author would like to thank his family, friends and class-mates for their

    constant support and encouragement.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    8/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    Table of Figures

    Figure 1, Basic queuing process............................................................................................... 4 

    Figure 2, Lu-Kumar re-entrant network. .................................................................................. 7 

    Figure 3, Entity Generator sub-system. .................................................................................... 9 

    Figure 4, Entity Sink. ............................................................................................................... 9 

    Figure 5, Lu-Kumar network simulation model..................................................................... 11 

    Figure 6, Simulation model of service centre A..................................................................... 12 

    Figure 7, Simulation model of service centre B. .................................................................... 13 

    Figure 8, Queue and timer sub-system. .................................................................................. 14 

    Figure 9, Service time attribute block. ................................................................................... 15 

    Figure 10, Set Attribute block and its parameter. .................................................................. 16 

    Figure 11, Output switch block and its parameter. ................................................................ 17 

    Figure 12, Path Combiner block and its parameter. ............................................................... 17 

    Figure 13, Data acquisition subsystem. .................................................................................. 18 

    Figure 14, Simulation model of merged queue at station B. .................................................. 26 

    Figure 15, Total queue time of first 30th samples of stable system. ....................................... 28 

    Figure 16, Total queue time of first 30 samples of unstable system. ..................................... 29 

    Fi 17 WIP th i f t f l 2 d l 4 f th t bl t k ith IA 1 0 40

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    9/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    List of Tables

    Table 1 Variation of inter-arrival time for following entities ................................................ 20 

    Table 2 Variation of service time of virtual stations .............................................................. 22 

    Table 3 Variation of service time of all service centres ......................................................... 23 

    Table 4 Combination of m2 and m3 variation ....................................................................... 24 

    Table 5 Book Keeping for inter-arrival time =0.8 ................................................................. 31 

    Table 6 Book Keeping for inter-arrival time =1.0 ................................................................. 32 

    Table 7 Book Keeping for inter-arrival time= 1.1 ................................................................. 41

    Table 8 Book Keeping for unstable network with inter-arrival time=1.2...............................40

    Table 9 Book Keeping for stable network with inter-arrival time=1.2...................................45

    Table 10 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time=0.9_1.50_1.50_1.50_... ................................. 64 

    Table 11 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time=0.9_1.40_1.40_1.40_... ................................. 65 

    Table 12 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.30_1.30_1.30_... ................................ 68 

    Table 13 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.25_1.25_1.25_... ................................ 70 

    Table 14 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.21_1.21_1.21_... ................................ 72 

    Table 15 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.205_1.205_1.205_... .......................... 74 

    Table 16 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.201_1.201_1.201_... .......................... 76 

    T bl 17 B k k i f i t i l ti 0 9 0 9 1 201 1 201 1 201 80

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    10/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION

    1.1  Introduction

    Queuing networks are used to model manufacturing systems, communication networks,

    silicon wafer manufacturing plants, internet service provider domains, freeway systems or

    customers waiting scenarios at ATM at the bank. Recent research is focused on multi-classqueuing network [1]. In multi-class queuing network, customers served at same stations have

    different requirement and follow different paths. Such networks are used to model the silicon

    wafer manufacturing facilities in which wafers follow a deterministic route and revisit the

    same station multiple times because same tools and same stations would be needed at

    different stages of production for the same wafer. Multiclass queuing networks of this type

    are called re-entrant line queuing networks. [1, 2]

    There are very high numbers of steps in a silicon wafer manufacturing process and the

    economical efficiency is very crucial because of high investment in manufacturing facilities,

    the decision could not depends solely on intuition or primitive heuristics. However, the exact

    calculation of queuing network is very expensive for practical engineering purposes. Thus,

    i l ti f t i t L K t t li t k ill b th t ti i t

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    11/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

      To investigate the behaviour of the Lu-Kumar network when the inter-arrival

    time is changed from an instable range to a stable range.

      To understand the behaviour of a virtual station in the Lu-Kumar network.

      To understand the nature of the queuing system when queues at Service Centre

    B of the Lu-Kumar network are merged into one queue.

    1.3  Scope of Work

    For this study for the Lu-Kumar network, the following assumptions are made

      The buffer at each service station is assumed to be infinite.

       No pre-emptive interruption within the queuing system during service for every

    station.

      The travelling time for entities between the stations is instantaneous.

      The external inter-arrival times as well as service times of each sever are

    independent and identically distributed (iid)

    The scope of this FYP is as follow:

      Design and develop of Lu-Kumar network model using ‘MatLab SimEvent’.

      Verify the model by comparing with the MM1 queue model

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    12/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    1.4  Organization

    This report is divided into five chapters. The scope of the respective chapters is as follows:

    Chapter 1: I ntroduction

    This chapter highlights the significance of multi-class queuing networks and also introduces

    the two service centres Lu-Kumar re-entrant network which is the main focus of this report.

    Chapter 2: Literatur e Review

    This chapter introduces the basics of queuing theory and the features in the Lu-Kumar

    network. The features include:

      Stability of the network.

      Virtual stations in the network.

    Chapter 3: Methodology

    This chapter highlights the investigation approach, method of experiments, development ofsimulation models and parameter of simulation models for each case.

    Chapter 4: Resul ts, Analysis and Discussion

    This chapter shows the result of book-keeping for deterministic condition as well as the result

    of simulation result under both deterministic arrival time and uniform distribution arrival time

    with deterministic service time. Moreover, it explains the condition where the system will

    b k bl f ll di i i i i l d h d i i i

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    13/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    CHAPTER 2LITERATURE REVIEW

    2.1 Queuing theory

    2.1.1 Basic queuing process

    Customers who require the service enter the queuing system by following queue discipline.

    The customers are from calling population or input source. After the customers have acquired

    the service from server, they leave the queuing system. The process is show in Fig. 1.Queuing

    theory is a branch of Operations Research because the results gathered can be used to make

    decisions about the resources (number of servers, type of queue) required to provide a service.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    14/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    The time between two consecutive arrivals is defined as inter-arrival time (1/λ). Usually the

    inter-arrival time is assumed to be Poisson process in which customers’ arrival to the queuing

    system is random but at a certain fixed mean rate.

    Sometimes there are unusual assumptions for arrival of customers’ behaviour. For example, if

    queue is too long, the customers decide not to enter the system. Such behaviour is called

     balking.

    2.1.3 Queue

    The queue is where customers wait before being served. Queues are called infinite or finite

    depending on whether the capacity is infinite or finite. If the upper bound of the queuing

    system is small enough to fill with some inter-arrival frequency, the finite queue must be

    assumed.

    2.1.4 Queue Discipline

    The queue discipline is defined as the order or discipline in which customers are selected for

    service. And it refers to scheduling policy in Lu-Kumar network. For example, First Buffer

    First Serve (FBFS) or Last Buffer First Serve (LBFS).

    2 1 5 S i M h i

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    15/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    2.1.7 Stability of queuing system 

    For a queuing system to be stable, the mean arrival rate should be less than the mean service

    rate. In other words, the utilization should be less than 1. For the scheduling policies to be

    stable, the utilization must be less than 1. When the utilization is greater than 1, the queue will

    grow infinitely and the system will be unstable. 

    2.1.8Little’s Law

     Little’s Law represents the relationship between the expected number of customers in the

    queuing system and the cycle time (service time plus queuing time) of the system. Little’s

    Law is perhaps most widely used in queuing theory

    =   L=expected number of customers in the queuing system

    =expected arrival rate

    W=cycle time (service time plus queue time)

    2.1.9 Kendall’s Notation 

    Queuing model are described by Kendall’s notation. Both inter -arrival time and service times

    are assumed to be independent and identically distributed.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    16/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    2.2 Lu-Kumar re-entrant Network

    The Lu-Kumar re-entrant network is shown in Fig. 2. 

    Figure 2, Lu-Kumar re-entrant network.

    m1, m2, m3 and m4 are service time for respective service station. The arrival rate is α1.

    The operational policy is that Last Buffer First Serve (LBFS) policy at Station A and First

    Buffer First Serve (FBFS) policy at Station B. The priority buffer is highlighted with orange

    in each station inside the figure.

    2.2.1 Stability of Lu-Kumar re-entrant network

    A di [7] d hi i l li h i bl if d l if

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    17/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    2.2.2 Virtual Stations of Lu-Kumar re-entrant network

    Virtual stations affect the global stability of queuing networks as some buffers can never be

    served simultaneously even though they are at different stations. [8] 

    Jobs in buffer 2 and buffer 4 can never be processed simultaneously.

    Under the operational policy,

    2()4() = 0 ≥ 0 

    if 2(0)4(0) = 0 . Thus, classes {2, 4} form a virtual station. [9]If v = α(m2 + m4) > 1 , with probability one, the total number of jobs goes to infinity.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    18/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    CHAPTER 3

    METHODOLOGY

    3.1  Stability region of the Lu-Kumar network

    3.1.1  Development of Simulation model

    The Lu-Kumar network model is designed in the MatLab SimEvent software. The model is as

    shown in Fig. 5.The simulation model consists of Service Centre A, Service Centre B, Entity

    Generator sub-system and Entity Sink.

    Time-based Entity Generator and inter-arrival time block

    Fi 3 E i G b

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    19/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    Service time for m1, m2, m3 and m4 are set at service time 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively.

    For deterministic case, the service time and inter-arrival time are set as constant. But the

    model is simulated by m.file to vary the deterministic inter-arrival time according to the

    experimental requirements. The Matlab file (‘.m’) to run the Lu-Kumar network with

    deterministic inter-arrival time and service time is shown in Appendix A.

    For Poisson arrival and exponential service time, the inter-arrival time is varied according to

    the utilization of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95 respectively to simulate the Lu-Kumar network in

    which the effect of the virtual stations to be investigated. But the model is simulated by

    m.file. The m.file is written in such a way that the inter-arrival time is varied according to the

    utilization of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95 respectively and the respective data are collected. The

    Matlab file (‘.m’) to run the Lu-Kumar network with Poisson arrival and exponential service

    time is shown in Appendix B.

    Fig. 6 and 7 show the detail design of Service Centre A and Service Centre B of the Lu-

    Kumar network respectively.

    Each service centre consists of queue and timer sub-system, data acquisition sub-system,

    server sub-system and entity routing sub-system.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    20/146

     

    11 | P a g e  

    Figure 5, Lu-Kumar network simulation model.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    21/146

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    22/146

     

    13 | P a g e  

    Figure 7, Simulation model of service centre B.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    23/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    Queue and timer

    The entity waits at the queue if the server is busy. Only FIFO rule is applied for all the queue in

    this project. The start timer counts the time when an entity comes inside the queue and the read

    timer counts the time when the entity goes outs from the queue so that the waiting time at the

    queue can be calculated.

    Figure 8, Queue and timer sub-system.

    Service time sub-system

    i i b i f i i ib bl k d h i i

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    24/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    Figure 9, Service time attribute block.

     Routing entity sub-system

    The routing entity sub-system consists of set attribute block, attribute function block and path

    combiner. Each entity is set to the particular attributes at set attribute block which is shown in

    Fig. 10. Based on the attributes, output switch will route the entity ethier reloop or exit. The

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    25/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    Figure 10, Set Attribute block and its parameter.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    26/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    Figure 11, Output switch block and its parameter.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    27/146

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    28/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    Only first 30 samples are simulated as 30 samples are good enough to determine the stability of

    the system. The total queue time for each case is plotted for the first 30 samples.

    3.1.3 Manual book-keeping

    The deterministic service time for respective service station in the Lu-Kumar is the same as

    above.

    The manual book-keeping is performed with deterministic inter-arrival time as follow so that the

     behaviour of interaction among the servers can be understood in depth as well as the WIP growth

    in front of class 2 and class 4 can be investigated.

     AT=0.8, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2

    3.1.4 Parameters of the simulation model, uniform distribution arrival time

    The deterministic service time for each station in the network is the same as above experiment.

    m1=0.2, m2=0.6, m3=0.1 and m4=0.6

    But the inter-arrival time is set as uniform distribution as follow.

    (a)  Uniform distribution between 0.8 and 0.90; unif (0.8,0.9)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    29/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    3.2  Stability, Instability and their relationship

    3.2.1  Design of Experiment for the Lu-Kumar network started with single

    inter-arrival time of 0.9

    In order to examine the relationship between stability and instability, the experiment is set as

    follow.

    The deterministic service time for each station is the same as above experiment.

    m1=0.2, m2=0.6, m3=0.1 and m4=0.6

    The inter-arrival time for 1st entity 0.9 because the system is unstable when inter-arrival time is

    exactly 0.9. In order to find out the condition that the system will come back to stable state, the

    deterministic inter-arrival time for following entities are varied as shown in Table 1A.

    TABLE 1A: VARIATION OF INTER-ARRIVAL TIME FOR THE FOLLOWING ENTITIES

    No. I nter-arri val time Value

    1.  AT 0.85

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    30/146

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    31/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    3.3  Virtual Stations in the Lu-Kumar Network

    3.3.1  Development of Simulation model

    The same Lu-Kumar network simulation model is used and it is simulated by using m.file to run

    with different parameters. The m.file is shown in Appendix B.

    3.3.2 Parameters of the simulation model

    Both inter-arrival time and service time are set as the exponential distribution. The exponential

    mean of service time for each station is fixed and the exponential mean of inter-arrival time is

    varied to achieve the utilization of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95 respectively. This can be achieved

     by writing the m.file to simulate with different inter-arrival time. 90% confidence interval is used

    when analysing the queuing time for each station as well as the total queuing time.

    In this experiment, each observation is made up of 32 samples. Each batch of sample consists of

    200,000 data points (sample size) and the first 400,000 data points are neglected as a warm up

    samples. A warm up is used to allow the system to reach steady-state before the system behaviour

    is analysed.

    3.3.3  Parameters of virtual stations

    To investigate the nature of virtual stations in the Lu-Kumar network, the service time of virtual

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    32/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    To observe the effect of varying the service time of m1 and m3, the service times are varied as

    shown in Table 3.But the total average service time of each station including the virtual stations is

    kept constant mean value of 0.8.

    TABLE 3: VARIATION OF SERVICE TIME OF ALL SERVICE CENTRES

    7  0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0

    8  0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0

    9  0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0

    Combination

    Station A  Station B 

    m1 m4 m2 m3

    1  0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0

    2  0.7 0.1 0.7 0.1

    3  0.6 0.2 0.6 0.2

    4  0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3

    5  0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

    6  0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    33/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    3.4  Merged Queue at Service Centre B of the Lu-Kumar network

    3.4.1  Development of Simulation model

    The Lu-Kumar network model is updated at service centre B in such a way that buffer at m2 and

     buffer at m3 are merged into one more buffer as shown in Fig. 14.

    The m.file is written so that the model can be simulated with different parameters. The m.file is

    shown in the appendix B.

    3.4.2  Parameters of the simulation model

    The mean value of exponential service time for m2 and m3 are varied as follow.

    TABLE 4: COMBINATION OF M2 AND M3 VARIATION

    Combination m2 m3

    1. 0 0.8

    2. 0.1 0.7

    3. 0.2 0.6

    4. 0.25 0.55

    5. 0.3 0.5

    6. 0.35 0.45

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    34/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    samples. The total queue time is compared to the queue time of MM1 model respectively and

    graph of the ratio of total queue time to MM1 queue time vs. the service time variation is plotted.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    35/146

     

    26 | P a g e  

    Figure 14, Simulation model of merged queue at station B.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    36/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    CHAPTER 4

    RESULTS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

    4.1 Stability region of the Lu-Kumar network

    4.1.1 Simulation Result, deterministic inter-arrival time

    The stability region of the Lu-Kumar network is identified when both inter-arrival time andservice time are deterministic. The total queue time of first 30 samples with different inter-arrival

    time is shown in Fig. 15 and 16.The former shows total queue time of the stable network and the

    latter shows the total queue time of the unstable network. The total queue time of unstable

    network is increasing with time. Thus, the system is stable when

    0.8 ≤

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    37/146

     

    28 | P a g e  

    Figure 15, Total queue time of first 30th samples of stable system.

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

       t   o   t   a    l   q   u   e   u   e   t    i   m   e

    nth  samples

    AT=1.6

    AT=1.5

    AT=1.4

    AT=1.3

    AT=1.2

    AT=1.1

    AT=0.8

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    38/146

     

    29 | P a g e  

    Figure 16, Total queue time of first 30 samples of unstable system.

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

       t   o   t   a    l   q   u

       e   u   e   t    i   m   e

    nth samples

    AT=0.7

    AT=0.69

    AT=0.79

    AT=0.9

    AT=1

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    39/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    4.1.2 Book Keeping

    4.1.2.1 Inter-arrival time =0.8

    The manual book keeping for inter-arrival time of 0.8 is shown in Table 5. When the 2 nd entity is

    generated, the 1st entity is at m3. After m3 has served 1 st entity and 1st entity has already reached

    in front of m4, m1 is still serving 2nd  entity. Hence, 1st  entity has to wait at buffer 4 until 2nd 

    entity is finished serving by m1 even though m4 is priority. When m1 has served 2 nd entity, 2nd

    entity goes to m2. Thus, m2 serves 2nd entity and m4 serves 1st entity simultaneously even though

    m2 and m4 are virtual stations (ghost machines). It is highlighted with blue colour in the table

    when virtual stations serve the jobs simultaneously. Thus, this network is stable because virtual

    stations work simultaneously and synchronization occurs even though inter-arrival time is 0.8.

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    40/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    TABLE 5: BOOK KEEPING FOR INTER-ARRIVAL TIME =0.8

    Time Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out

    0 1st 1st (0)

    0.2 1st (0.2) 1st (0)

    0.8 2nd 2nd (0) 1st (0.6) 1st (0)

    0.9 2nd (0.1) 1st (0.1) 1st (0)

    1 2nd (0.2) 2nd (0) 1st (0)

    1.5 2nd (0.5) 1st (0.5)

    1.6 3rd 3rd (0) 2nd (0.6) 2nd (0) 1st (0.6) 1st

    1.7 3rd (0.1) 2nd (0.1) 2nd (0)

    1.8 3rd (0.2) 3rd (0) 2nd (0)

    2.3 3rd (0.5) 2nd (0.5)

    2.4 4th 4th (0) 3rd (0.6) 3rd (0) 2nd (0.6) 2nd

    2.5 4th (0.1) 3rd (0.1) 3rd (0)

    2.6 4th (0.2) 4th (0) 3rd (0)

    3.1 4th (0.5) 3rd (0.5)

    3.2 5th 5th (0) 4th (0.6) 4th (0) 3rd (0.6) 3rd

    3.3 5th (0.1) 4th (0.1) 4th (0)

    3.4 5th (0.2) 5th (0) 4th (0)

    3.9 5th (0.5) 4th (0.5)

    4 6th 6th (0) 5th (0.6) 5th (0) 4th (0.6) 4th

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    41/146

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    42/146

     

    33 | P a g e  

    6.9 0.1 4th(0.1),5th(0),6th(0),7th(0) 4th (0)

    7 0.1 1 8th 8th(0) 5th(0.1),6th(0),7th(0) 4th (0.1), 5th (0)

    7.1 0.1 8th(0) 6th(0.1),7th(0) 4th (0.2), 5th (0), 6th (0)

    7.2 0.1 8th(0) 7th(0.1) 4th (0.3), 5th (0), 6th (0), 7th (0)

    7.5 0.3 8th(0) 4th (0.6), 5th (0), 6th (0), 7th (0) 4th

    8 0.5 1 9th 8th(0),9th(0) 5th (0.5), 6th (0), 7th (0)

    8.1 0.1 8th(0),9th(0) 5th (0.6), 6th (0), 7th (0) 5th

    8.7 0.6 8th(0),9th(0) 6th (0.6), 7th (0) 6th

    9 0.3 1 10th 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0) 7th (0.3)

    9.3 0.3 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0) 7th (0.6) 7th

    9.5 0.2 8th(0.2),9th(0),10th(0) 8th(0)

    9.7 0.2 9th(0.2),10th(0) 8th(0.2),9th(0)

    9.9 0.2 10th(0.2) 8th(0.4),9th(0),10th(0)

    10 0.1 1 11th 11th(0) 8th(0.5),9th(0),10th(0)

    10.1 0.1 11th(0.1) 8th(0.6),9th(0),10th(0) 8th (0)

    10.2 0.1 11th(0.2) 9th(0.1),10th(0),11th(0) 8th (0)

    10.7 0.5

    0

    .

    7

    9th(0.6),10th(0),11th(0) 8th(0),9th(0)

    11 0.3 1 12th 12th(0) 10th(0.3),11th(0) 8th(0),9th(0)

    11.2 0.2 12th(0.2) 10th(0.5),11th(0),12th(0) 8th(0),9th(0)

    11.3 0.1 10th(0.6),11th(0),12th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0)

    11.9 0.6

    0

    .

    9

    11th(0.6),12th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0)

    12 0.1 1 13th 13th(0) 12th(0.1) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0)

    12.2 0.2 13th(0.2) 12th(0.3),13th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0)

    12.5 0.3 12th(0.6),13th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0)

    13 0.5 1 14th 14th(0) 13th(0.5) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0)

    13.1 0.1 14th(0.1) 13th(0.6) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0)

    13.2 0.1 14th(0.2) 14th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0)

    13.8 0.6 14th(0.6)8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),

    14th(0)

    13.9 0.18th(0.1),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),

    13th(0),14th(0)8th(0)

    14 0.1 1 15th 15th(0) 9th(0.1),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0)

    8th(0.1),9th(0)

    14.1 0.1 15th(0) 10th(0.1),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0) 8th(0.2),9th(0),10th(0)

    14.2 0.1 15th(0) 11th(0.1),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0) 8th(0.3),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0)

    14.3 0.1 15th(0) 12th(0.1),13th(0),14th(0) 8th(0.4),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0)

    14.4 0.1 15th(0) 13th(0.1),14th(0)8th(0.5),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),

    13th(0)

    14.5 0.1 15th(0) 14th(0.1) 8th(0.6),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0), 8th

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    43/146

     

    34 | P a g e  

    13th(0),14th(0)

    15 0.5 1 16th 15th(0),16th(0)9th(0.5),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),

    14th(0)

    15.1 0.1 15th(0),16th(0)9th(0.6),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),

    14th(0)9th

    15.7 0.6 15th(0),16th(0) 10th(0.6),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0) 10th

    16 0.3 1 17th 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0) 11th(0.3),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0)

    16.3 0.3 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0) 11th(0.6),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0) 11th

    16.9 0.6 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0) 12th(0.6),13th(0),14th(0) 12th17 0.1 1 18th 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0) 13th(0.1),14th(0)

    17.5 0.5 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0) 13th(0.6),14th(0) 13th

    18 0.5 1 19th 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 14th(0.5)

    18.1 0.1 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 14th(0.6) 14th

    18.3 0.2 15th(0.2),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 15th(0)

    18.5 0.2 16th(0.2),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 15th(0.2),16th(0)

    18.7 0.2 17th(0.2),18th(0),19th(0) 15th(0.4),16th(0),17th(0)

    18.9 0.2 18th(0.2),19th(0) 15th(0.6),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0) 15th(0)

    19 0.1 1 20th 19th(0.1),20th(0) 16th(0.1),17th(0),18th(0) 15th(0)

    19.1 0.1 19th(0.2),20th(0) 16th(0.2),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 15th(0)

    19.3 0.2 20th(0.2) 16th(0.4),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 15th(0)

    19.5 0.2 16th(0.6),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 15th(0),16th(0)

    20 0.5 1 21st 21st(0) 17th(0.5),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 15th(0),16th(0)20.1 0.1 21st(0.1) 17th(0.6),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0)

    20.2 0.1 21st(0.2) 18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0)

    20.8 0.6 18th(0.6),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0)

    21 0.2 1 22nd 22nd(0) 19th(0.2),20th(0),21st(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0)

    21.2 0.2 22nd(0.2) 19th(0.4),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0)

    21.4 0.2 19th(0.6),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0)

    22 0.6 1 23rd 23rd(0) 20th(0.6),21st(0),22nd(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0)

    22.2 0.2 23rd(0.2) 21st(0.2),22nd(0),23rd(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0)

    22.6 0.4 21st(0.6),22nd(0),23rd(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0),21st(0)

    23 0.4 1 24th 24th(0) 22nd(0.4),23rd(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0),21st(0)

    23.2 0.2 24th(0.2) 22nd(0.6),23rd(0),24th(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0)

    23.8 0.6 23rd(0.6),24th(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)

    24 0.2 1 25th 25th(0) 24th(0.2)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)

    24.2 0.2 25th(0.2) 24th(0.4),25th(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    44/146

     

    35 | P a g e  

    20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)

    24.4 0.2 24th(0.6),25th(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0)

    25 0.6 1 26th 26th(0) 25th(0.6)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th

    (0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0)

    25.1 0.1 26th(0.1)

    15th(0.1),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),

    20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),

    25th(0)

    15th(0)

    25.2 0.1 26th(0.2) 26th(0)

    16th(0.1),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),

    21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 15th(0),16th(0)

    25.8 0.6 26th(0.6)17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),

    22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)15th(0.6),16th(0) 15th

    25.9 0.117th(0.1),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),

    22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.1),17th(0)

    26 0.1 1 27th 27th(0)18th(0.1),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),

    23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.2),17th(0),18th(0)

    26.1 0.1 27th(0)19th(0.1),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),

    24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.3),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0)

    26.2 0.1 27th(0)20th(0.1),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),

    25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.4),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0)

    26.3 0.1 27th(0)21st(0.1),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),

    26th(0)

    16th(0.5),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),

    21st(0)

    26.4 0.1 27th(0) 22nd(0.1),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.6),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),

    21st(0),22nd(0)16th

    26.5 0.1 27th(0) 23rd(0.1),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)17th(0.1),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),

    22nd(0),23rd(0)

    26.6 0.1 27th(0) 24th(0.1),25th(0),26th(0)17th(0.2),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),

    22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0)

    26.7 0.1 27th(0) 25th(0.1),26th(0)17th(0.3),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),

    22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0)

    26.8 0.1 27th(0) 26th(0.1)17th(0.4),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),

    22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)

    27 0.2 1 28th 27th(0),28th(0)17th(0.6),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),

    22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)17th

    27.6 0.6 27th(0),28th(0)18th(0.6),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),

    23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)18th

    28 0.4 1 29th 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)19th(0.4),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),

    24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)

    28.2 0.2 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)

    19th(0.6),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),

    24th(0),25th(0),26th(0) 19th

    28.8 0.6 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)20th(0.6),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),

    25th(0),26th(0)20th

    29 0.2 1 30th 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)21st(0.2),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),

    26th(0)

    29.4 0.4 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)21st(0.6),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),

    26th(0)21st

    30 0.6 1 31st 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0) 22nd(0.6),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0) 22nd

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    45/146

     

    36 | P a g e  

    30.6 0.6 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0) 23rd(0.6),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0) 23rd

    31 0.4 1 32nd 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0) 24th(0.4),25th(0),26th(0)

    31.2 0.2 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0) 24th(0.6),25th(0),26th(0) 24th

    31.8 0.6 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0) 25th(0.6),26th(0) 25th

    32 0.2 1 33rd27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0)26th(0.2)

    32.4 0.427th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0)26th(0.6) 26th

    32.6 0.2 27th(0.2),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0)

    27th(0)

    32.8 0.228th(0.2),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0)27th(0.2),28th(0)

    33 0.2 1 34th29th(0.2),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),

    34th(0)27th(0.4),28th(0),29th(0)

    33.2 0.2 30th(0.2),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0) 27th(0.6),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 27th(0)

    33.4 0.2 31st(0.2),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0) 28th(0.2),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0) 27th(0)

    33.6 0.2 32nd(0.2),33rd(0),34th(0) 28th(0.4),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0) 27th(0)

    33.8 0.2 33rd(0.2),34th(0) 28th(0.6),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0) 27th(0),28th(0)

    34 0.2 1 35th 34th(0.2),35th(0) 29th(0.2),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0) 27th(0),28th(0)

    34.2 0.2 35th(0.2)29th(0.4),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),

    35th(0)27th(0),28th(0)

    34.4 0.229th(0.6),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),

    35th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)

    35 0.6 1 36th 36th(0) 30th(0.6),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)

    35.2 0.2 36th(0.2) 31st(0.2),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)

    35.6 0.4 31st(0.6),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0)

    36 0.4 1 37th 37th(0) 32nd(0.4),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0)

    36.2 0.2 37th(0.2) 32nd(0.6),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0)

    36.8 0.6 33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0)

    37 0.2 1 38th 38th(0) 34th(0.2),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0)

    37.2 0.2 38th(0.2) 34th(0.4),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0)

    37.4 0.2 34th(0.6),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0)

    38 0.6 1 39th 39th(0) 35th(0.6),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)

    38.2 0.2 39th(0.2) 36th(0.2),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)

    38.6 0.4 36th(0.6),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)

    39 0.4 1 40th 40th(0) 37th(0.4),38th(0),39th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    46/146

     

    37 | P a g e  

    39.2 0.2 40th(0.2) 37th(0.6),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0)

    39.8 0.6 38th(0.6),39th(0),40th(0)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0)

    40 0.2 1 41st 41st(0) 39th(0.2),40th(0)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0)

    40.2 0.2 41st(0.2) 39th(0.4),40th(0),41st(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0)

    40.4 0.2 39th(0.6),40th(0),41st(0)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0)

    41 0.6 1 42nd 42nd(0) 40th(0.6),41st(0)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)

    41.2 0.2 42nd(0.2) 41st(0.2),42nd(0)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)

    41.6 0.4 41st(0.6),42nd(0)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)

    42 0.4 1 43rd 43rd(0) 42nd(0.4)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)

    42.2 0.2 43rd(0.2) 42nd(0.6),43rd(0)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),

    42nd(0)

    42.8 0.6 43rd(0.6)

    27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),

    42nd(0),43rd(0)

    42.9 0.1

    27th(0.1),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),

    42nd(0),43rd(0)

    27th(0)

    43 0.1 1 44th 44th(0)28th(0.1),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),

    38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),

    43rd(0)

    27th(0.1),28th(0)

    43.1 0.1 44th(0)

    29th(0.1),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),

    34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),

    39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    27th(0.2),28th(0),29th(0)

    43.2 0.1 44th(0)30th(0.1),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),

    35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),27th(0.3),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    47/146

    38 | P a g e  

    40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    43.3 0.1 44th(0)

    31st(0.1),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),

    36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),

    41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    27th(0.4),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0)

    43.4 0.1 44th(0)

    32nd(0.1),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),

    42nd(0),43rd(0)

    27th(0.5),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0)

    43.5 0.1 44th(0)

    33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),

    38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),

    43rd(0)

    27th(0.6),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),

    32nd(0),33rd(0)

    27th

    43.6 0.1 44th(0)34th(0.1),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),

    39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    28th(0.1),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0),34th(0)

    43.7 0.1 44th(0)35th(0.1),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),

    40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    28th(0.2),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)

    43.8 0.1 44th(0)36th(0.1),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),

    41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    28th(0.3),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)

    43.9 0.1 44th(0)37th(0.1),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),

    42nd(0),43rd(0)

    28th(0.4),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0)

    44 0.1 1 45th 44th(0),45th(0)38th(0.1),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),

    43rd(0)

    28th(0.5),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),

    38th(0)

    44.1 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 39th(0.1),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    28th(0.6),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),

    33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),

    38th(0),39th(0)

    28th

    44.2 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 40th(0.1),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)29th(0.1),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),

    39th(0),40th(0)

    44.3 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 41st(0.1),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    29th(0.2),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),

    34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),

    39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)

    44.4 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 42nd(0.1),43rd(0)

    29th(0.3),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),

    34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),

    39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0)

    44.5 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 43rd(0.1)

    29th(0.4),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),

    34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),

    39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    44.7 0.2

    0

    .

    7

    44th(0),45th(0)

    29th(0.6),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),

    34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),

    39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    29th

    45 0.3 1 46th 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)30th(0.3),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),

    40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    45.3 0.3 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)

    30th(0.6),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),

    35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),

    40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    30th

    45.9 0.6 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)31st(0.6),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),

    36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),31st

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    48/146

    39 | P a g e  

    41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    46 0.1 1 47th 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)

    32nd(0.1),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),

    42nd(0),43rd(0)

    46.5 0.5 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)

    32nd(0.6),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),

    37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),

    42nd(0),43rd(0)

    32nd

    47 0.5 1 48th 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)

    33rd(0.5),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),

    38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),

    43rd(0)

    47.1 0.1 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)

    33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),

    38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),

    43rd(0)

    33rd

    47.7 0.6

    0

    .

    7

    44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)34th(0.6),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),

    39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)34th

    48 0.3 1 49th 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0)35th(0.3),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),

    40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)

    48.3 0.3 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0)35th(0.6),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),

    40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)35th

    48.9 0.6 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0)36th(0.6),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),

    41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)36th

    49 0.1 1 50th44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0),

    50th(0)

    37th(0.1),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),

    42nd(0),43rd(0)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    49/146

     

    40 | P a g e  

    Figure 17, WIP growth in front of class 2 and class 4 of the unstable network with IA=1.0

    0

    5

    10

    15

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

        W    I    P

    Time

    Class 2 Class 4

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    50/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    4.1.2.3 Inter-arrival time=1.1

    Manual book keeping for inter-arrival time=1.1 is shown in Table 7. This system is stable

     because of similar behaviour which is m2 and m4 (ghost machines) serve simultaneously even

    though they are virtual stations. It is also highlighted with blue colour when virtual stations work

    simultaneously.

    TABLE 7: BOOK KEEPING FOR INTER-ARRIVAL TIME= 1.1

    Time Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out

    0 1st 1st (0)

    0.2 1st (0.2) 1st (0)

    0.8 1st (0.6) 1st (0)

    0.9 1st (0.1) 1st (0)

    1.1 2nd 2nd (0) 1st (0.2)

    1.5 2nd (0) 1st (0.6) 1st (0)

    1.7 2nd (0.2) 2nd (0)

    2.2 3rd 3rd (0) 2nd (0.5)

    2.3 3rd (0.1) 2nd (0.6) 2nd (0)

    2.4 3rd (0.2) 3rd (0) 2nd (0.1) 2nd (0)

    3 3rd (0.6) 3rd (0) 2nd (0.6) 2nd (0)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    51/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    7.5 7th (0.1) 7th (0)

    7.7 8th 8th (0) 7th (0.2)8.1 8th (0) 7th (0.6) 7th (0)

    8.3 8th (0.2) 8th (0)

    8.8 9th 9th (0) 8th (0.5)

    8.9 9th (0.1) 8th (0.6) 8th (0)

    9 9th (0.2) 9th (0) 8th (0.1) 8th (0)

    9.6 9th (0.6) 9th (0) 8th (0.6) 8th (0)

    9.7 9th (0.1) 9th (0)9.9 10th 10th (0) 9th (0.2)

    10.3 10th (0) 9th (0.6) 9th (0)

    4.1.2.4 Inter-arrival time=1.2

    There are two scenarios for inter-arrival time=1.2 case.

    One results in unstable system. This is due to the virtual stations that do not serve the entities

    simultaneously. Book-keeping for this unstable system is shown in Table 8. At time=9.8,

    machine, m2 just finish serving 8 th  entity and simultaneously, machine, m1 also just finish

    serving 9th entity. At the moment, 7th entity is already waiting at machine, m3 and thus, 8th entity

    will join the queue behind 7th entity at m3 while 9

    th entity will be at the entry of m2. Since m2 is

    the priority buffer compared to m3, m2 will serve the 9 th entity even though 7th entity is already

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    52/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    When m3 finished serving 7th entity, m2 will serve the waiting 9th entity while m4 will serve the

    incoming 7th entity. This is when each virtual station serves each respective job simultaneously.

    The following cycle will continue repeating thereby, synchronizing virtual stations. That results

    in a stable network. Inside the book-keeping, it is highlighted with blue colour when virtual

    stations work simultaneously. Fig. 19 shows the growth of WIP in front of virtual stations in the

    stable network. It can be seen that the maximum WIP for each machine is kept at a constant of

    two jobs all the time.

    The main objective of above simulation is to study the buffer effects in a marginally stable

    system. The buffer effect is found to stabilize a marginally stable system. Please take note that the

     buffer effects of subsequent book-keeping have been eliminated.

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    53/146

    44 | P a g e  

    TABLE 8: BOOK KEEPING FOR UNSTABLE NETWORK WITH INTER-ARRIVAL TIME =1.2

    TimeTime

    diffIA Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out

    0 1st 1st(0)

    0.2 0.2 1st(0.2) 1st(0)

    0.8 0.6 1st(0.6) 1st(0)

    0.9 0.1 0.9 1st(0.1) 1st(0)

    1.2 0.3 1.2 2nd 2nd(0) 1st(0.3)1.5 0.3 2nd(0) 1st(0.6) 1st

    1.7 0.2 2nd(0.2) 2nd(0)

    2.3 0.6 1.1 2nd(0.6) 2nd(0)

    2.4 0.1 1.2 3rd 3rd(0) 2nd(0.1) 2nd(0)

    3 0.6 3rd(0) 2nd(0.6) 2nd

    3.2 0.2 0.8 3rd(0.2) 3rd(0)

    3.6 0.4 1.2 4th 4th(0) 3rd(0.4)

    3.8 0.2 4th(0.2) 3rd(0.6),4th(0) 3rd(0)

    4.4 0.6 0.8 4th(0.6) 3rd(0),4th(0)

    4.5 0.1 3rd(0.1),4th(0) 3rd(0)

    4.6 0.1 1 4th(0.1) 3rd(0.1),4th(0)

    4.8 0.2 1.2 5th 5th(0) 3rd(0.3),4th(0)

    5.1 0.3 5th(0) 3rd(0.6),4th(0) 3rd5.7 0.6 0.9 5th(0) 4th(0.6) 4th

    5.9 0.2 0.8 5th(0.2) 5th(0)

    6 0.1 1.2 6th 6th(0) 5th(0.1)

    6.2 0.2 6th(0.2) 5th(0.3),6th(0)

    6.5 0.3 5th(0.6),6th(0) 5th(0)

    7.1 0.6 1.1 6th(0.6) 5th(0),6th(0)

    7.2 0.1 1.2 7th 7th(0) 5th(0.1),6th(0) 5th(0)

    7.7 0.5 7th(0) 6th(0.1) 5th(0.1),6th(0)

    7.8 0.1 7th(0) 5th(0.6),6th(0) 5th

    8.4 0.6 1.2 8th 7th(0),8th(0) 6th(0.6) 6th

    8.6 0.2 7th(0.2),8th(0) 7th(0)

    8.8 0.2 8th(0.2) 7th(0.2),8th(0)

    9.2 0.4 0.8 7th(0.6),8th(0) 7th(0)

    9.6 0.4 1.2 9th 9th(0) 8th(0.4) 7th(0)

    9.8 0.2 9th(0.2) 8th(0.6),9th(0) 7th(0),8th(0)

    10.4 0.6 0.8 9th(0.6) 7th(0),8th(0),9th(0)

    10.5 0.1 7th(0.1),8th(0),9th(0) 7th(0)

    10.6 0.1 8th(0.1),9th(0) 7th(0.1),8th(0)

    10.7 0.1 1.1 9th(0.1) 7th(0.2),8th(0),9th(0)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    54/146

    45 | P a g e  

    10.8 0.1 1.2 10th 10th(0) 7th(0.3),8th(0),9th(0)

    11.1 0.3 10th(0) 7th(0.6),8th(0),9th(0) 7th

    11.7 0.6 0.9 10th(0) 8th(0.6),9th(0) 8th

    12 0.3 1.2 11th 10th(0),11th(0) 9th(0.3)

    12.3 0.3 10th(0),11th(0) 9th(0.6) 9th

    12.5 0.2 10th(0.2),11th(0) 10th(0)

    12.7 0.2 0.7 11th(0.2) 10th(0.2),11th(0)

    13.1 0.4 0.8 10th(0.6),11th(0) 10th(0)

    13.2 0.1 1.2 12th 12th(0) 11th(0.1) 10th(0)

    13.4 0.2 12th(0.2) 11th(0.3),12th(0) 10th(0)

    13.7 0.3 11th(0.6),12th(0) 10th(0),11th(0)

    14.3 0.6 1.1 12th(0.6) 10th(0),11th(0),12th(0)

    14.4 0.1 1.2 13th 13th(0) 10th(0.1),11th(0),12th(0) 10th(0)

    14.5 0.1 13th(0) 11th(0.1),12th(0) 10th(0.1),11th(0)

    14.6 0.1 13th(0) 12th(0.1) 10th(0.2),11th(0),12th(0)

    15 0.4 0.6 13th(0) 10th(0.6),11th(0),12th(0) 10th

    15.6 0.6 1.2 14th 13th(0),14th(0) 11th(0.6),12th(0) 11th

    16.2 0.6 13th(0),14th(0) 12th(0.6) 12th

    16.4 0.2 13th(0.2),14th(0) 13th(0)

    16.6 0.2 1 14th(0.2) 13th(0.2),14th(0)

    16.8 0.2 1.2 15th 15th(0) 13th(0.4),14th(0)

    17 0.2 15th(0.2) 13th(0.6),14th(0),15th(0) 13th(0)

    17.6 0.6 0.8 14th(0.6),15th(0) 13th(0),14th(0)

    18 0.4 1.2 16th 16th(0) 15th(0.4) 13th(0),14th(0)

    18.2 0.2 16th(0.2) 15th(0.6),16th(0) 13th(0),14th(0),15th(0)

    18.8 0.6 0.8 16th(0.6) 13th(0),14th(0),15th(0),16th(0)

    18.9 0.1 13th(0.1),14th(0),15th(0),16th(0) 13th(0)

    19 0.1 14th(0.1),15th(0),16th(0) 13th(0.1),14th(0)

    19.1 0.1 15th(0.1),16th(0) 13th(0.2),14th(0),15th(0)

    19.2 0.1 1.2 17th 17th(0) 16th(0.1) 13th(0.3),14th(0),15th(0),16th(0)

    19.5 0.3 17th(0) 13th(0.6),14th(0),15th(0),16th(0) 13th

    20.1 0.6 0.9 17th(0) 14th(0.6),15th(0),16th(0) 14th

    20.4 0.3 1.2 18th 17th(0),18th(0) 15th(0.3),16th(0)

    20.7 0.3 17th(0),18th(0) 15th(0.6),16th(0) 15th

    21.3 0.6 17th(0),18th(0) 16th(0.6) 16th

    21.5 0.2 1.1 17th(0.2),18th(0) 17th(0)

    21.6 0.1 1.2 19th 18th(0.1),19th(0) 17th(0.1)

    21.7 0.1 18th(0.2),19th(0) 17th(0.2),18th(0)

    21.9 0.2 19th(0.2) 17th(0.4),18th(0),19th(0)

    22.1 0.2 17th(0.6),18th(0),19th(0) 17th(0)

    22.7 0.6 1.1 18th(0.6),19th(0) 17th(0),18th(0)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    55/146

    46 | P a g e  

    22.8 0.1 1.2 20th 20th(0) 19th(0.1) 17th(0),18th(0)

    23 0.2 20th(0.2) 19th(0.3),20th(0) 17th(0),18th(0)

    23.3 0.3 19th(0.6),20th(0) 17th(0),18th(0),19th(0)

    23.9 0.6 1.1 20th(0.6) 17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0)

    24 0.1 1.2 21st 21st(0) 17th(0.1),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 17th(0)

    24.1 0.1 21st(0) 18th(0.1),19th(0),20th(0) 17th(0.1),18th(0)

    24.2 0.1 21st(0) 19th(0.1),20th(0) 17th(0.2),18th(0),19th(0)

    24.3 0.1 21st(0) 20th(0.1) 17th(0.3),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0)

    24.6 0.3 21st(0) 17th(0.6),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 17th

    25.2 0.6 1.2 22nd 21st(0),22nd(0) 18th(0.6),19th(0),20th(0) 18th

    25.8 0.6 21st(0),22nd(0) 19th(0.6),20th(0) 19th

    26.4 0.6 1.2 23rd 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0) 20th(0.6) 20th

    26.6 0.2 21st(0.2),22nd(0),23rd(0) 21st(0)

    26.8 0.2 22nd(0.2),23rd(0) 21st(0.2),22nd(0)

    27 0.2 23rd(0.2) 21st(0.4),22nd(0),23rd(0)

    27.2 0.2 0.8 21st(0.6),22nd(0),23rd(0) 21st(0)

    27.6 0.4 1.2 24th 24th(0) 22nd(0.4),23rd(0) 21st(0)

    27.8 0.2 24th(0.2) 22nd(0.6),23rd(0),24th(0) 21st(0),22nd(0)

    28.4 0.6 0.8 23rd(0.6),24th(0) 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)

    28.8 0.4 1.2 25th 25th(0) 24th(0.4) 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)

    29 0.2 25th(0.2) 24th(0.6),25th(0) 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0)

    29.6 0.6 25th(0.6) 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0)

    29.7 0.1 21st(0.1),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 21st(0)

    29.8 0.1 22nd(0.1),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 21st(0.1),22nd(0)

    29.9 0.1 1.1 23rd(0.1),24th(0),25th(0) 21st(0.2),22nd(0),23rd(0)

    30 0.1 1.2 26th 26th(0) 24th(0.1),25th(0) 21st(0.3),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0)

    30.1 0.1 26th(0) 25th(0.1) 21st(0.4),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0)

    30.3 0.2 26th(0) 21st(0.6),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 21st

    30.9 0.6 0.9 26th(0) 22nd(0.6),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 22nd

    31.2 0.3 1.2 27th 26th(0),27th(0) 23rd(0.3),24th(0),25th(0)

    31.5 0.3 26th(0),27th(0) 23rd(0.6),24th(0),25th(0) 23rd

    32.1 0.6 0.9 26th(0),27th(0) 24th(0.6),25th(0) 24th

    32.4 0.3 1.2 28th 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0) 25th(0.3)

    32.7 0.3 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0) 25th(0.6) 25th

    32.9 0.2 26th(0.2),27th(0),28th(0) 26th(0)

    33.1 0.2 27th(0.2),28th(0) 26th(0.2),27th(0)

    33.3 0.2 0.9 28th(0.2) 26th(0.4),27th(0),28th(0)

    33.5 0.2 26th(0.6),27th(0),28th(0) 26th(0)

    33.6 0.1 1.2 29th 29th(0) 27th(0.1),28th(0) 26th(0)

    33.8 0.2 29th(0.2) 27th(0.3),28th(0),29th(0) 26th(0)

    34.1 0.3 27th(0.6),28th(0),29th(0) 26th(0),27th(0)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    56/146

    47 | P a g e  

    34.7 0.6 1.1 28th(0.6),29th(0) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0)

    34.8 0.1 1.2 30th 30th(0) 29th(0.1) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0)

    35 0.2 30th(0.2) 29th(0.3),30th(0) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0)

    35.3 0.3 29th(0.6),30th(0) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)

    35.9 0.6 1.1 30th(0.6) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)

    36 0.1 1.2 31st 31st(0) 26th(0.1),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 26th(0)

    36.1 0.1 31st(0) 27th(0.1),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 26th(0.1),27th(0)

    36.2 0.1 31st(0) 28th(0.1),29th(0),30th(0) 26th(0.2),27th(0),28th(0)

    36.3 0.1 31st(0) 29th(0.1),30th(0) 26th(0.3),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)

    36.4 0.1 31st(0) 30th(0.1) 26th(0.4),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)

    36.6 0.2 0.6 31st(0) 26th(0.6),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 26th

    37.2 0.6 1.2 32nd 31st(0),32nd(0) 27th(0.6),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 27th

    37.8 0.6 31st(0),32nd(0) 28th(0.6),29th(0),30th(0) 28th

    38.4 0.6 1.2 33rd 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0) 29th(0.6),30th(0) 29th

    39 0.6 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0) 30th(0.6) 30th

    39.2 0.2 31st(0.2),32nd(0),33rd(0) 31st(0)

    39.4 0.2 32nd(0.2),33rd(0) 31st(0.2),32nd(0)

    39.6 0.2 1.2 34th 33rd(0.2),34th(0) 31st(0.4),32nd(0),33rd(0)

    39.8 0.2 34th(0.2) 31st(0.6),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0) 31st(0)

    40.4 0.6 0.8 32nd(0.6),33rd(0),34th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0)

    40.8 0.4 1.2 35th 35th(0) 33rd(0.4),34th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0)

    41 0.2 35th(0.2) 33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0)

    41.6 0.6 34th(0.6),35th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0)

    42 0.4 1.2 36th 36th(0) 35th(0.4) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0)

    42.2 0.2 36th(0.2) 35th(0.6),36th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)

    42.8 0.6 0.8 36th(0.6) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)

    42.9 0.1 31st(0.1),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 31st(0)

    43 0.1 32nd(0.1),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 31st(0.1),32nd(0)

    43.1 0.1 33rd(0.1),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 31st(0.2),32nd(0),33rd(0)

    43.2 0.1 1.2 37th 37th(0) 34th(0.1),35th(0),36th(0) 31st(0.3),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0)

    43.3 0.1 37th(0) 35th(0.1),36th(0) 31st(0.4),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)

    43.4 0.1 37th(0) 36th(0.1) 31st(0.5),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)

    43.5 0.1 37th(0) 31st(0.6),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 31st

    44.1 0.6 0.9 37th(0) 32nd(0.6),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 32nd

    44.4 0.3 1.2 38th 37th(0),38th(0) 33rd(0.3),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)

    44.7 0.3 37th(0),38th(0) 33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 33rd

    45.3 0.6 0.9 37th(0),38th(0) 34th(0.6),35th(0),36th(0) 34th

    45.6 0.3 1.2 39th 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0) 35th(0.3),36th(0)

    45.9 0.3 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0) 35th(0.6),36th(0) 35th

    46.5 0.6 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0) 36th(0.6) 36th

    46.7 0.2 1.1 37th(0.2),38th(0),39th(0) 37th(0)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    57/146

    48 | P a g e  

    46.8 0.1 1.2 40th 38th(0.1),39th(0),40th(0) 37th(0.1)

    46.9 0.1 38th(0.2),39th(0),40th(0) 37th(0.2),38th(0)

    47.1 0.2 39th(0.2),40th(0) 37th(0.4),38th(0),39th(0)

    47.3 0.2 40th(0.2) 37th(0.6),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0) 37th(0)

    47.9 0.6 1.1 38th(0.6),39th(0),40th(0) 37th(0),38th(0)

    48 0.1 1.2 41st 41st(0) 39th(0.1),40th(0) 37th(0),38th(0)

    48.2 0.2 41st(0.2) 39th(0.3),40th(0),41st(0) 37th(0),38th(0)

    48.5 0.3 39th(0.6),40th(0),41st(0) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0)

    49.1 0.6 1.1 40th(0.6),41st(0) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)

    49.2 0.1 1.2 42nd 42nd(0) 41st(0.1) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)

    49.4 0.2 42nd(0.2) 41st(0.3),42nd(0) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)

    49.7 0.3 41st(0.6),42nd(0) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)

    50.3 0.6 1.1 42nd(0.6) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0)

    50.4 0.1 1.2 43rd 43rd(0) 37th(0.1),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th(0)

    50.5 0.1 43rd(0) 38th(0.1),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th(0.1),38th(0)

    50.6 0.1 43rd(0) 39th(0.1),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th(0.2),38th(0),39th(0)

    50.7 0.1 43rd(0) 40th(0.1),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th(0.3),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)

    50.8 0.1 43rd(0) 41st(0.1),42nd(0) 37th(0.4),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)

    50.9 0.1 43rd(0) 42nd(0.1) 37th(0.5),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0)

    51 0.1 0.6 0 43rd(0) 37th(0.6),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th

    51.6 0.6 1.2 44th 43rd(0),44th(0) 38th(0.6),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 38th

    52.2 0.6 43rd(0),44th(0) 39th(0.6),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 39th

    52.8 0.6 1.2 45th 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0) 40th(0.6),41st(0),42nd(0) 40th

    53.4 0.6 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0) 41st(0.6),42nd(0) 41st

    54 0.6 1.2 46th 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0) 42nd(0.6) 42nd

    54.2 0.2 43rd(0.2),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0) 43rd(0)

    54.4 0.2 44th(0.2),45th(0),46th(0) 43rd(0.2),44th(0)

    54.6 0.2 45th(0.2),46th(0) 43rd(0.4),44th(0),45th(0)

    54.8 0.2 0.8 46th(0.2) 43rd(0.6),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0) 43rd(0)

    55.2 0.4 1.2 47th 47th(0) 44th(0.4),45th(0),46th(0) 43rd(0)

    55.4 0.2 47th(0.2) 44th(0.6),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0)

    56 0.6 45th(0.6),46th(0),47th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0)

    56.4 0.4 1.2 48th 48th(0) 46th(0.4),47th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0)

    56.6 0.2 48th(0.2) 46th(0.6),47th(0),48th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)

    57.2 0.6 47th(0.6),48th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)57.6 0.4 1.2 49th 49th(0) 48th(0.4) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)

    57.8 0.2 49th(0.2) 48th(0.6),49th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)

    58.4 0.6 0.8 49th(0.6) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0)

    58.5 0.1 43rd(0.1),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0)

    58.6 0.1 44th(0.1),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0.1),44th(0)

    58.7 0.1 45th(0.1),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0.2),44th(0),45th(0)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    58/146

    49 | P a g e  

    58.8 0.1 1.2 50th 50th(0) 46th(0.1),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0.3),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)

    58.9 0.1 50th(0) 47th(0.1),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0.4),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)

    59 0.1 50th(0) 48th(0.1),49th(0) 43rd(0.5),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)

    59.1 0.1 50th(0) 49th(0.1) 43rd(0.6),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    59/146

     

    50 | P a g e  

    TABLE 9: BOOK KEEPING FOR STABLE NETWORK WITH INTER-ARRIVAL TIME =1.2

    TimeTime

    diffIA Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out

    Buffer Server Buffer Server Buffer Server Buffer Server0 1st

    0 1st(0)

    0 1st(0)

    0.2 0.2 1st(0.2)

    0.2 1st(0)

    0.2 1st(0)

    0.8 0.6 1st(0.6)

    0.8 1st(0)

    0.8 1st(0)

    0.9 0.1 0.9 1st(0.1)

    0.9 1st(0)

    0.9 1st(0)

    1.2 0.3 1.2 2nd 1st(0.3)

    1.2 2nd(0) 1st(0.3)

    1.5 0.3 2nd(0) 1st(0.6) 1st

    1.5 2nd(0)

    1.7 0.2 2nd(0.2)

    1.7 2nd(0)

    1.7 2nd(0)2.3 0.6 1.1 2nd(0.6)

    2.3 2nd(0)

    2.3 2nd(0)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    60/146

     

    51 | P a g e  

    2.4 0.1 1.2 3rd 2nd(0.1)

    2.4 3rd(0) 2nd(0)

    2.4 3rd(0) 2nd(0)

    3 0.6 3rd(0) 2nd(0.6) 2nd

    3 3rd(0)

    3.2 0.2 0.8 3rd(0.2)

    3.2 3rd(0)

    3.2 3rd(0)

    3.6 0.4 1.2 4th 3rd(0.4)

    3.6 4th(0)

    3.6 4th(0)

    3.8 0.2 4th(0.2) 3rd(0.6)

    3.8 4th(0) 3rd(0)

    3.8 4th(0) 3rd(0)

    4.4 0.6 0.8 4th(0.6) 3rd(0)

    4.4 4th(0) 3rd(0)

    4.5 0.1 4th(0) 3rd(0.1)

    4.5 4th(0) 3rd(0)

    4.5 3rd(0)

    4.6 0.1 1 4th(0.1) 3rd(0.1)

    4.6 4th(0) 3rd(0.1)

    4.8 0.2 1.2 5th 4th(0) 3rd(0.3)

    4.8 5th(0) 4th(0) 3rd(0.3)

    5.1 0.3 5th(0) 4th(0) 3rd(0.6) 3rd

    5.1 5th(0) 4th(0)

    5.7 0.6 0.9 5th(0) 4th(0.6) 4th

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    61/146

     

    52 | P a g e  

    5.7 5th(0)

    5.9 0.2 0.8 5th(0.2)

    5.9 5th(0)

    5.9 5th(0)

    6 0.1 1.2 6th 5th(0.1)

    6 6th(0) 5th(0.1)

    6 6th(0) 5th(0.1)

    6.2 0.2 6th(0.2) 5th(0.3)

    6.2 6th(0)

    6.5 0.3 6th(0) 5th(0.6)

    6.5 6th(0) 5th(0)

    7.1 0.6 1.1 6th(0.6) 5th(0)

    7.1 5th(0),6th(0)

    7.1 6th(0) 5th(0)

    7.2 0.1 1.2 7th 6th(0) 5th(0.1)

    7.2 7th(0) 6th(0) 5th(0)

    7.2 7th(0) 6th(0) 5th(0)

    7.3 0.1 7th(0) 6th(0.1) 5th(0.1)

    7.3 7th(0) 6th(0) 5th(0.1)

    7.8 0.5 7th(0) 6th(0) 5th(0.6) 5th

    7.8 7th(0) 6th(0)

    8.4 0.6 1.2 8th 7th(0) 6th(0.6) 6th

    8.4 8th(0) 7th(0)

    8.6 0.2 8th(0) 7th(0.2)8.6 8th(0) 7th(0)

    8.6 8th(0) 7th(0)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    62/146

     

    53 | P a g e  

    8.8 0.2 8th(0.2) 7th(0.2)

    8.8 8th(0) 7th(0.2)

    9.2 0.4 0.8 8th(0) 7th(0.6)

    9.2 8th(0) 7th(0)

    9.6 0.4 1.2 9th 8th(0.4) 7th(0)

    9.6 9th(0) 8th(0.4) 7th(0)

    9.6 9th(0) 8th(0.4) 7th(0)

    9.8 0.2 9th(0.2) 8th(0.6) 7th(0)

    9.8 9th(0) 8th(0) 7th(0)

    9.9 0.1 9th(0) 8th(0) 7th(0.1)

    9.9 9th(0) 7th(0)

    9.9 9th(0) 7th(0)

    10.5 0.6 0.9 9th(0.6) 8th(0) 7th(0.6) 7th

    10.5 9th(0) 8th(0)

    10.6 0.1 9th(0) 8th(0.1)

    10.6 9th(0) 8th(0)

    10.6 9th(0) 8th(0)

    10.7 0.1 9th(0.1) 8th(0.1)

    10.7 9th(0) 8th(0.1)

    10.8 0.1 1.2 10th 9th(0) 8th(0.2)

    10.8 10th(0) 9th(0) 8th(0.2)

    11.2 0.4 10th(0) 9th(0) 8th(0.6) 8th

    11.2 10th(0) 9th(0)

    11.8 0.6 10th(0) 9th(0.6) 9th11.8 10th(0)

    12 0.2 1.2 11th 10th(0.2)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    63/146

     

    54 | P a g e  

    12 11th(0) 10th(0)

    12 11th(0) 10th(0)

    12.2 0.2 11th(0.2) 10th(0.2)

    12.2 11th(0) 10th(0.2)

    12.2 11th(0) 10th(0.2)

    12.6 0.4 0.6 11th(0) 10th(0.6)

    12.6 11th(0) 10th(0)

    13.2 0.6 1.2 12th 11th(0.6) 10th(0)

    13.2 12th(0) 11th(0) 10th(0)

    13.2 12th(0) 10th(0)

    13.3 0.1 12th(0.1) 11th(0) 10th(0.1)

    13.3 12th(0.1) 11th(0) 10th(0)

    13.4 0.1 12th(0.2) 11th(0.1) 10th(0)

    13.4 12th(0) 11th(0) 10th(0)

    13.4 12th(0) 11th(0) 10th(0)

    14 0.6 12th(0.6) 11th(0) 10th(0.6) 10th

    14 12th(0) 11th(0)

    14 12th(0) 11th(0)

    14.1 0.1 0.9 12th(0.1) 11th(0.1)

    14.1 12th(0) 11th(0.1)

    14.4 0.3 1.2 13th 12th(0) 11th(0.4)

    14.4 13th(0) 12th(0) 11th(0.4)

    14.6 0.2 13th(0) 12th(0) 11th(0.6) 11th

    14.6 13th(0) 12th(0)15.2 0.6 13th(0) 12th(0.6) 12th

    15.2 13th(0)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    64/146

     

    55 | P a g e  

    15.4 0.2 1 13th(0.2)

    15.4 13th(0)

    15.4 13th(0)

    15.6 0.2 1.2 14th 13th(0.2)

    15.6 14th(0) 13th(0.2)

    15.6 14th(0) 13th(0.2)

    15.8 0.2 14th(0.2) 13th(0.4)

    15.8 14th(0)

    16 0.2 14th(0) 13th(0.6)

    16 14th(0) 13th(0)

    16.6 0.6 1 14th(0.6) 13th(0)

    16.6 14th(0) 13th(0)

    16.7 0.1 14th(0) 13th(0.1) 13th(0)

    16.7 14th(0) 13th(0)

    16.7 13th(0)

    16.8 0.1 1.2 15th 14th(0.1) 13th(0.1)

    16.8 15th(0) 14th(0) 13th(0.1)

    17.3 0.5 15th(0) 14th(0) 13th(0.6) 13th

    17.3 15th(0) 14th(0)

    17.9 0.6 1.1 15th(0) 14th(0.6) 14th

    17.9 15th(0)

    18 0.1 1.2 16th 15th(0.1)

    18 16th(0) 15th(0.1)

    18.1 0.1 16th(0) 15th(0.2)18.1 16th(0) 15th(0)

    18.1 16th(0) 15th(0)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    65/146

    56 | P a g e  

    18.3 0.2 16th(0.2) 15th(0.2)

    18.3 16th(0) 15th(0.2)

    18.7 0.4 0.7 16th(0) 15th(0.6)

    18.7 16th(0) 15th(0)

    19.2 0.5 1.2 17th 16th(0.5) 15th(0)

    19.2 17th(0) 16th(0.5) 15th(0)

    19.2 17th(0) 16th(0.5) 15th(0)

    19.3 0.1 17th(0.1) 16th(0.6) 15th(0)

    19.3 17th(0.1) 16th(0) 15th(0)

    19.4 0.1 17th(0.2) 16th(0) 15th(0.1)

    19.4 17th(0) 16th(0) 15th(0)

    19.4 17th(0) 16th(0) 15th(0)

    19.5 0.1 17th(0) 16th(0.1) 15th(0.1)

    19.5 17th(0) 16th(0) 15th(0.1)

    20 0.5 17th(0.5) 16th(0) 15th(0.6) 15th

    20 17th(0.5) 16th(0)

    20.1 0.1 17th(0.6) 16th(0.1)

    20.1 17th(0) 16th(0.1)

    20.1 17th(0) 16th(0.1)

    20.2 0.1 1 17th(0.1) 16th(0.2)

    20.2 17th(0) 16th(0.2)

    20.4 0.2 1.2 18th 17th(0) 16th(0.4)

    20.4 18th(0) 17th(0) 16th(0.4)

    20.6 0.2 18th(0) 17th(0) 16th(0.6) 16th20.6 18th(0) 17th(0)

    21.2 0.6 18th(0) 17th(0.6) 17th

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    66/146

    57 | P a g e  

    21.2 18th(0)

    21.4 0.2 1 18th(0.2)

    21.4 18th(0)

    21.4 18th(0)

    21.6 0.2 1.2 19th 18th(0.2)

    21.6 19th(0) 18th(0.2)

    21.6 19th(0) 18th(0.2)

    21.8 0.2 19th(0.2) 18th(0.4)

    21.8 19th(0) 18th(0.4)

    22 0.2 19th(0) 18th(0.6)

    22 19th(0) 18th(0)

    22.6 0.6 1 19th(0.6) 18th(0)

    22.6 19th(0) 18th(0)

    22.7 0.1 0.9 19th(0) 18th(0.1)

    22.7 19th(0) 18th(0)

    22.7 19th(0) 18th(0)

    22.8 0.1 1.2 20th 19th(0.1) 18th(0.1)

    22.8 20th(0) 19th(0) 18th(0.1)

    23.3 0.5 20th(0) 19th(0) 18th(0.6) 18th

    23.3 19th(0)

    23.9 0.6 20th(0) 19th(0.6) 19th

    23.9 20th(0)

    24 0.1 1.2 21st 20th(0.1)

    24 21st(0) 20th(0.1)24.1 0.1 21st(0) 20th(0.2)

    24.1 21st(0) 20th(0)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    67/146

    58 | P a g e  

    24.1 20th(0)

    24.3 0.2 21st(0.2) 20th(0.2)

    24.7 0.4 0.7 21st(0) 20th(0.6)

    24.7 21st(0) 20th(0)

    25.2 0.5 1.2 22nd 21st(0.5) 20th(0)25.2 22nd(0) 21st(0.5) 20th(0)

    25.2 22nd(0) 21st(0.5) 20th(0)

    25.3 0.1 22nd(0.1) 21st(0.6) 20th(0)

    25.3 22nd(0.1) 21st(0) 20th(0)

    25.4 0.1 22nd(0.2) 21st(0) 20th(0.1)

    25.4 22nd(0) 21st(0) 20th(0)

    25.4 22nd(0) 21st(0) 20th(0)

    25.5 0.1 22nd(0) 21st(0.1) 20th(0.1)

    25.4 22nd(0) 21st(0) 20th(0.1)

    26 0.5 0.8 22nd(0.5) 21st(0) 20th(0.6) 20th

    26 22nd(0.5) 21st(0)

    26.1 0.1 22nd(0.6) 21st(0.1)

    26.1 22nd(0) 21st(0.1)

    26.1 22nd(0) 21st(0.1)

    26.2 0.1 1 22nd(0.1) 21st(0.2)

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    68/146

    59 | P a g e  

    Figure 18, WIP growth in front of virtual stations in the unstable network with IA=1.2

    0

    5

    10

    15

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

        W    I    P

    Time

    Class 2 Class 4

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    69/146

    60 | P a g e  

    Figure 19, WIP growth in front of virtual stations in the stable network with IA=1.2

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30

        W    I    P

    Time

    Class 2 Class 4

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    70/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    4.1.3 Simulation Result, uniform distribution inter-arrival time

    The simulation result of the Lu-Kumar network is shown in Fig. 20 in which the inter-arrival time

    is the uniform distribution and the service time is deterministic. The system is stable when the

    uniform distribution of the inter-arrival time is between 0.8 and 0.9. When uniform distribution is

    (0.8, 0.9), the probability of falling on two end points is zero. In mathematical form,

    (0.8) = 0 & (0.9) = 0 Thus, inter-arrival time will never be 0.9 and the system will not go into unstable state. However,

    when the uniform distribution of the inter-arrival time is (0.8, 1.0) or (0.8, 0.905) or even (0.8,

    0.9005), the system will finally go into unstable state as there is a probability that the inter-arrival

    time becomes 0.9 or more than 0.9. When the inter-arrival time becomes 0.9 or more than 0.9, the

    system falls into unstable state and will not come back to the stable state in this case even though

    the following inter-arrival time is between 0.8 and 0.9. That leads to the next topic of the

    condition in which the Lu-Kumar network will come back to the stable state when the initial

    inter-arrival time is 0.9 i.e. there is a small disturbance at initial state of the system.

     

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    71/146

    62 | P a g e  

    Figure 20, Total queue time of first 300 samples with different uniform distribution arrival time.

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

        T   o   t   a

        l    Q   t    i   m   e

    nth sample

    AT= uniform dis (0.8,0.9)

    AT=uniform dis (0.8,0.905)

    AT=uniform dis (0.8,0.9005)

    AT= uniform dis (0.8,0.92)

    AT=uniform dis (0.8,1)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    72/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    4.2 Stability, Instability and their relationship

    4.2.1 System started single 0.9 inter-arrival time

    After inter-arrival time for 1st entity is 0.9, the system will come back to stable state only when

    the inter-arrival time of the following entities is more than 1.2 (excluding 1.2). The respective

     book keeping of each experiment is discussed in detail as below.

    4.2.1.1 Book-keeping for Inter-arrival time = 0.9_0.85_0.85_0.85… 

    The system with inter-arrival time =0.9_0.85_0.85_0.85… is not stable as the synchronization

     between virtual stations happens only 0.6 sec at 11.35 sec from the start. Only this 0.6sec is not

    enough for the system to come back to the stable state.

    Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_0.85_0.85_0.85_... is shown in appendix C because of

    limited space inside this main report. It is highlighted with blue colour when virtual stations work

    simultaneously i.e. synchronization occurs between virtual stations. The book-keeping is shown

    only until 50th entity because of limited space of the report.

    4.2.1.2 Book-keeping for Inter-arrival time = 0.9_1.10_1.10_1.10…  

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    73/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    4.2.1.4 Book-keeping for Inter-arrival time = 0.9_1.50_1.50_1.50… 

    The book-keeping for inter-arrival time=0.9_1.50_1.50_1.50_... is shown in Table 10. This

    system is stable because the inter-arrival time becomes equal to the total service time

    (0.2+0.6+0.1+0.6=1.5) of the system. When a particular entity comes into the system, another

    entity is about to come out of the system. That helps the system to be balanced and the system

    stable even though there is a small disturbance at initial state and synchronization between virtual

    machines does not occur at all.

    TABLE 10: BOOK-KEEPING FOR INTER-ARRIVAL TIME=0.9_1.50_1.50_1.50_...

    Timetime

    diffIA Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out

    0 1st 1st (0)

    0.2 0.2 1st (0.2) 1st (0)0.8 0.6 1st (0.6) 1st (0)

    0.9 0.1 0.9 2nd 2nd (0) 1st (0.1) 1st (0)

    1.5 0.6 2nd (0) 1st (0.6) 1st

    1.7 0.2 2nd (0.2) 2nd (0)

    2.3 0.6 2nd (0.6) 2nd (0)

    2.4 0.1 1.5 3rd 3rd(0) 2nd (0.1) 2nd (0)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    74/146

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    75/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    6.8 0.3 6th(0) 5th(0.6) 5th

    7 0.2 6th(0.2) 6th(0)7.6 0.6 1.1 6th(0.6) 6th(0)

    7.7 0.1 6th(0.1) 6th(0)

    7.9 0.2 1.4 7th 7th(0) 6th(0.2)

    8.3 0.4 7th(0) 6th(0.6) 6th

    8.5 0.2 7th(0.2) 7th(0)

    9.1 0.6 7th(0.6) 7th(0)

    9.2 0.1 7th(0.1) 7th(0)9.3 0.1 1.4 8th 8th(0) 7th(0.1)

    9.8 0.5 8th(0) 7th(0.6) 7th

    10 0.2 8th(0.2) 8th(0)

    10.6 0.6 8th(0.6) 8th(0)

    10.7 0.1 1.4 9th 9th(0) 8th(0.1) 8th(0)

    11.3 0.6 9th(0) 8th(0.6) 8th

    11.5 0.2 9th(0.2) 9th(0)12.1 0.6 1.4 10th 10th(0) 9th(0.6) 9th(0)

    12.2 0.1 10th(0.1) 9th(0.1) 9th(0)

    12.3 0.1 10th(0.2) 10th(0) 9th(0)

    12.9 0.6 10th(0.6) 10th(0) 9th(0.6) 9th

    13 0.1 10th(0.1) 10th(0)

    13.5 0.5 1.4 11th 11th(0) 10th(0.5)

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    76/146

  • 8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn

    77/146

      NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network

    30.2 0.6 22nd(0.6) 22nd(0)

    30.3 0.1 1.4 23rd 23rd(0) 22nd(0.1) 22nd(0)30.9 0.6 23rd(0) 22nd(0.6) 22nd

    31.1 0.2 23rd(0.2) 23rd(0)

    31.7 0.6 1.4 24th 24th(0) 23rd(0.6) 23rd(0)

    31.8 0.1 24th(0.1) 23rd(0.1) 23rd(0)

    31.9 0.1 24t