Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
-
Upload
johnconnor -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
1/146
Acad Year(14/15)
PROJECT
NO.
(B004)
MEAN QUEUE TIME STUDY FOR THE LU-KUMAR
NETWORK
ME
ANQUEUETIM
E
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
2/146
E
MEAN QUEUE TIME STUDY FOR THE LU-KUMAR NETWORK
SUBMITTED
BY
NYAN SOE LYNN
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
3/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... i
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ iv
ACKNOWLWDGEMENTS .................................................................................................... v
Table of Figures ...................................................................................................................... vi
List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... vii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1
1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Objectives ................................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Scope of Work ......................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Organization ............................................................................................................. 3
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................ 4
2 1 Q i h 4
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
4/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 9
3.1 Stability region of the Lu-Kumar network ............................................................... 9
3.1.1 Development of Simulation model .................................................................. 9
3.1.2 Parameter of the simulation model, deterministic case .................................. 18
3.1.3 Manual book-keeping ..................................................................................... 19
3.1.4 Parameters of the simulation model, uniform distribution arrival time ........ 19
3.2 Stability, Instability and their relationship ............................................................. 20
3.2.1 Design of Experiment for the Lu-Kumar network started with single inter-
arrival time of 0.9 ........................................................................................................... 20
3.2.2 Design of Experiment for the Lu-Kumar network started with double inter-
arrival time of 0.9 ........................................................................................................... 21
3.3 Virtual Stations in the Lu-Kumar Network ............................................................ 22
3.3.1 Development of Simulation model ................................................................ 22
3.3.2 Parameters of the simulation model ............................................................... 22
3 3 3 P t f i t l t ti 22
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
5/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
4.4.1 Relationship between virtual stations and MM1 queue ............................... 101
4.5 Merged Queue at Service Centre B of the Lu-Kumar network ............................ 104
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION ........................................... 106
5.1 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 106
5.1.1 Stability Region of the Lu-Kumar network .................................................. 106
5.1.2 Stability, Instability and their relationship of the Lu-Kumar network ......... 106
5.1.3 Virtual Stations in the Lu-Kumar network ................................................... 107
5.1.4 Merged Queue at Service Centre B of the Lu-Kumar network .................... 107
5.2 LEARNING ......................................................................................................... 107
5.3 RECOMMENDATION FOR FUTURE WORK ................................................. 107
5.3.1 Stability, Instability and their relationship of the Lu-Kumar network ......... 107
5.3.2 Virtual Stations in the Lu-Kumar network ................................................... 108
5.3.3 Merged Queue at Service Centre B of the Lu-Kumar network .................... 108
REFRENCES ....................................................................................................................... 109
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
6/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
ABSTRACT
Manufacturing system, communication network, silicon wafer manufacturing plant, internet
service provider domain and freeway system are usually modelled with multi-class queuing
network. The aim of this project is to deeply understand the nature of the Lu-Kumar
network. The queue time of the Lu-Kumar network is hard to predict due to the mutual
blocking of virtual stations in the network.
In most of the literature, the stability of a network is discussed using a fluid model. But in
this project, the stability of a network is investigated by mean of manual book-keeping as
well as simulation model with deterministic inter-arrival time and service time. The
condition, for which the network will come back to the stable state when there is a small
disturbance at an initial state, is also examined.
To understand the nature of virtual stations in a network, the network is simulated with
MatEvent simulation model in which Poisson distribution is used for inter-arrival time and
Exponential distribution is used for service times. Moreover, two buffers at service centre B
of the Lu-Kumar network are merged into one queue to understand the blocking nature of the
network and the queue time is compared with MM1 queue time.
From the book-keeping and simulation result, it is found that the stability region of the
d t i i ti L K t k i di t It i b t 1 5 ti f ti j b
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
7/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
ACKNOWLWDGEMENTS
The author would like to extend his gratitude to individuals who have helped and supported
throughout this project.
Firstly, the author would like to express deep appreciation towards Assistant Professor Wu
Kan for his guidance, patience, support, encouragement and willingness to teach and share
the valuable insight from his research and experience.
Secondly, the author also would like to thank the research fellow, Dr. Daniel David
Moskovich for his guidance and assistance towards clearing the doubts regarding with the
Lu-Kumar network and book-keeping.
Thirdly, the author would like to thank his peer, Cheung Wai Lun for his assistance and
helpful discussion over this project.
Last, but not least, the author would like to thank his family, friends and class-mates for their
constant support and encouragement.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
8/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
Table of Figures
Figure 1, Basic queuing process............................................................................................... 4
Figure 2, Lu-Kumar re-entrant network. .................................................................................. 7
Figure 3, Entity Generator sub-system. .................................................................................... 9
Figure 4, Entity Sink. ............................................................................................................... 9
Figure 5, Lu-Kumar network simulation model..................................................................... 11
Figure 6, Simulation model of service centre A..................................................................... 12
Figure 7, Simulation model of service centre B. .................................................................... 13
Figure 8, Queue and timer sub-system. .................................................................................. 14
Figure 9, Service time attribute block. ................................................................................... 15
Figure 10, Set Attribute block and its parameter. .................................................................. 16
Figure 11, Output switch block and its parameter. ................................................................ 17
Figure 12, Path Combiner block and its parameter. ............................................................... 17
Figure 13, Data acquisition subsystem. .................................................................................. 18
Figure 14, Simulation model of merged queue at station B. .................................................. 26
Figure 15, Total queue time of first 30th samples of stable system. ....................................... 28
Figure 16, Total queue time of first 30 samples of unstable system. ..................................... 29
Fi 17 WIP th i f t f l 2 d l 4 f th t bl t k ith IA 1 0 40
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
9/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
List of Tables
Table 1 Variation of inter-arrival time for following entities ................................................ 20
Table 2 Variation of service time of virtual stations .............................................................. 22
Table 3 Variation of service time of all service centres ......................................................... 23
Table 4 Combination of m2 and m3 variation ....................................................................... 24
Table 5 Book Keeping for inter-arrival time =0.8 ................................................................. 31
Table 6 Book Keeping for inter-arrival time =1.0 ................................................................. 32
Table 7 Book Keeping for inter-arrival time= 1.1 ................................................................. 41
Table 8 Book Keeping for unstable network with inter-arrival time=1.2...............................40
Table 9 Book Keeping for stable network with inter-arrival time=1.2...................................45
Table 10 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time=0.9_1.50_1.50_1.50_... ................................. 64
Table 11 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time=0.9_1.40_1.40_1.40_... ................................. 65
Table 12 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.30_1.30_1.30_... ................................ 68
Table 13 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.25_1.25_1.25_... ................................ 70
Table 14 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.21_1.21_1.21_... ................................ 72
Table 15 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.205_1.205_1.205_... .......................... 74
Table 16 Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_1.201_1.201_1.201_... .......................... 76
T bl 17 B k k i f i t i l ti 0 9 0 9 1 201 1 201 1 201 80
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
10/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Queuing networks are used to model manufacturing systems, communication networks,
silicon wafer manufacturing plants, internet service provider domains, freeway systems or
customers waiting scenarios at ATM at the bank. Recent research is focused on multi-classqueuing network [1]. In multi-class queuing network, customers served at same stations have
different requirement and follow different paths. Such networks are used to model the silicon
wafer manufacturing facilities in which wafers follow a deterministic route and revisit the
same station multiple times because same tools and same stations would be needed at
different stages of production for the same wafer. Multiclass queuing networks of this type
are called re-entrant line queuing networks. [1, 2]
There are very high numbers of steps in a silicon wafer manufacturing process and the
economical efficiency is very crucial because of high investment in manufacturing facilities,
the decision could not depends solely on intuition or primitive heuristics. However, the exact
calculation of queuing network is very expensive for practical engineering purposes. Thus,
i l ti f t i t L K t t li t k ill b th t ti i t
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
11/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
To investigate the behaviour of the Lu-Kumar network when the inter-arrival
time is changed from an instable range to a stable range.
To understand the behaviour of a virtual station in the Lu-Kumar network.
To understand the nature of the queuing system when queues at Service Centre
B of the Lu-Kumar network are merged into one queue.
1.3 Scope of Work
For this study for the Lu-Kumar network, the following assumptions are made
The buffer at each service station is assumed to be infinite.
No pre-emptive interruption within the queuing system during service for every
station.
The travelling time for entities between the stations is instantaneous.
The external inter-arrival times as well as service times of each sever are
independent and identically distributed (iid)
The scope of this FYP is as follow:
Design and develop of Lu-Kumar network model using ‘MatLab SimEvent’.
Verify the model by comparing with the MM1 queue model
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
12/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
1.4 Organization
This report is divided into five chapters. The scope of the respective chapters is as follows:
Chapter 1: I ntroduction
This chapter highlights the significance of multi-class queuing networks and also introduces
the two service centres Lu-Kumar re-entrant network which is the main focus of this report.
Chapter 2: Literatur e Review
This chapter introduces the basics of queuing theory and the features in the Lu-Kumar
network. The features include:
Stability of the network.
Virtual stations in the network.
Chapter 3: Methodology
This chapter highlights the investigation approach, method of experiments, development ofsimulation models and parameter of simulation models for each case.
Chapter 4: Resul ts, Analysis and Discussion
This chapter shows the result of book-keeping for deterministic condition as well as the result
of simulation result under both deterministic arrival time and uniform distribution arrival time
with deterministic service time. Moreover, it explains the condition where the system will
b k bl f ll di i i i i l d h d i i i
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
13/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
CHAPTER 2LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Queuing theory
2.1.1 Basic queuing process
Customers who require the service enter the queuing system by following queue discipline.
The customers are from calling population or input source. After the customers have acquired
the service from server, they leave the queuing system. The process is show in Fig. 1.Queuing
theory is a branch of Operations Research because the results gathered can be used to make
decisions about the resources (number of servers, type of queue) required to provide a service.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
14/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
The time between two consecutive arrivals is defined as inter-arrival time (1/λ). Usually the
inter-arrival time is assumed to be Poisson process in which customers’ arrival to the queuing
system is random but at a certain fixed mean rate.
Sometimes there are unusual assumptions for arrival of customers’ behaviour. For example, if
queue is too long, the customers decide not to enter the system. Such behaviour is called
balking.
2.1.3 Queue
The queue is where customers wait before being served. Queues are called infinite or finite
depending on whether the capacity is infinite or finite. If the upper bound of the queuing
system is small enough to fill with some inter-arrival frequency, the finite queue must be
assumed.
2.1.4 Queue Discipline
The queue discipline is defined as the order or discipline in which customers are selected for
service. And it refers to scheduling policy in Lu-Kumar network. For example, First Buffer
First Serve (FBFS) or Last Buffer First Serve (LBFS).
2 1 5 S i M h i
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
15/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
2.1.7 Stability of queuing system
For a queuing system to be stable, the mean arrival rate should be less than the mean service
rate. In other words, the utilization should be less than 1. For the scheduling policies to be
stable, the utilization must be less than 1. When the utilization is greater than 1, the queue will
grow infinitely and the system will be unstable.
2.1.8Little’s Law
Little’s Law represents the relationship between the expected number of customers in the
queuing system and the cycle time (service time plus queuing time) of the system. Little’s
Law is perhaps most widely used in queuing theory
= L=expected number of customers in the queuing system
=expected arrival rate
W=cycle time (service time plus queue time)
2.1.9 Kendall’s Notation
Queuing model are described by Kendall’s notation. Both inter -arrival time and service times
are assumed to be independent and identically distributed.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
16/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
2.2 Lu-Kumar re-entrant Network
The Lu-Kumar re-entrant network is shown in Fig. 2.
Figure 2, Lu-Kumar re-entrant network.
m1, m2, m3 and m4 are service time for respective service station. The arrival rate is α1.
The operational policy is that Last Buffer First Serve (LBFS) policy at Station A and First
Buffer First Serve (FBFS) policy at Station B. The priority buffer is highlighted with orange
in each station inside the figure.
2.2.1 Stability of Lu-Kumar re-entrant network
A di [7] d hi i l li h i bl if d l if
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
17/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
2.2.2 Virtual Stations of Lu-Kumar re-entrant network
Virtual stations affect the global stability of queuing networks as some buffers can never be
served simultaneously even though they are at different stations. [8]
Jobs in buffer 2 and buffer 4 can never be processed simultaneously.
Under the operational policy,
2()4() = 0 ≥ 0
if 2(0)4(0) = 0 . Thus, classes {2, 4} form a virtual station. [9]If v = α(m2 + m4) > 1 , with probability one, the total number of jobs goes to infinity.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
18/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Stability region of the Lu-Kumar network
3.1.1 Development of Simulation model
The Lu-Kumar network model is designed in the MatLab SimEvent software. The model is as
shown in Fig. 5.The simulation model consists of Service Centre A, Service Centre B, Entity
Generator sub-system and Entity Sink.
Time-based Entity Generator and inter-arrival time block
Fi 3 E i G b
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
19/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
Service time for m1, m2, m3 and m4 are set at service time 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively.
For deterministic case, the service time and inter-arrival time are set as constant. But the
model is simulated by m.file to vary the deterministic inter-arrival time according to the
experimental requirements. The Matlab file (‘.m’) to run the Lu-Kumar network with
deterministic inter-arrival time and service time is shown in Appendix A.
For Poisson arrival and exponential service time, the inter-arrival time is varied according to
the utilization of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95 respectively to simulate the Lu-Kumar network in
which the effect of the virtual stations to be investigated. But the model is simulated by
m.file. The m.file is written in such a way that the inter-arrival time is varied according to the
utilization of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95 respectively and the respective data are collected. The
Matlab file (‘.m’) to run the Lu-Kumar network with Poisson arrival and exponential service
time is shown in Appendix B.
Fig. 6 and 7 show the detail design of Service Centre A and Service Centre B of the Lu-
Kumar network respectively.
Each service centre consists of queue and timer sub-system, data acquisition sub-system,
server sub-system and entity routing sub-system.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
20/146
11 | P a g e
Figure 5, Lu-Kumar network simulation model.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
21/146
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
22/146
13 | P a g e
Figure 7, Simulation model of service centre B.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
23/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
Queue and timer
The entity waits at the queue if the server is busy. Only FIFO rule is applied for all the queue in
this project. The start timer counts the time when an entity comes inside the queue and the read
timer counts the time when the entity goes outs from the queue so that the waiting time at the
queue can be calculated.
Figure 8, Queue and timer sub-system.
Service time sub-system
i i b i f i i ib bl k d h i i
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
24/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
Figure 9, Service time attribute block.
Routing entity sub-system
The routing entity sub-system consists of set attribute block, attribute function block and path
combiner. Each entity is set to the particular attributes at set attribute block which is shown in
Fig. 10. Based on the attributes, output switch will route the entity ethier reloop or exit. The
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
25/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
Figure 10, Set Attribute block and its parameter.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
26/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
Figure 11, Output switch block and its parameter.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
27/146
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
28/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
Only first 30 samples are simulated as 30 samples are good enough to determine the stability of
the system. The total queue time for each case is plotted for the first 30 samples.
3.1.3 Manual book-keeping
The deterministic service time for respective service station in the Lu-Kumar is the same as
above.
The manual book-keeping is performed with deterministic inter-arrival time as follow so that the
behaviour of interaction among the servers can be understood in depth as well as the WIP growth
in front of class 2 and class 4 can be investigated.
AT=0.8, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2
3.1.4 Parameters of the simulation model, uniform distribution arrival time
The deterministic service time for each station in the network is the same as above experiment.
m1=0.2, m2=0.6, m3=0.1 and m4=0.6
But the inter-arrival time is set as uniform distribution as follow.
(a) Uniform distribution between 0.8 and 0.90; unif (0.8,0.9)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
29/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
3.2 Stability, Instability and their relationship
3.2.1 Design of Experiment for the Lu-Kumar network started with single
inter-arrival time of 0.9
In order to examine the relationship between stability and instability, the experiment is set as
follow.
The deterministic service time for each station is the same as above experiment.
m1=0.2, m2=0.6, m3=0.1 and m4=0.6
The inter-arrival time for 1st entity 0.9 because the system is unstable when inter-arrival time is
exactly 0.9. In order to find out the condition that the system will come back to stable state, the
deterministic inter-arrival time for following entities are varied as shown in Table 1A.
TABLE 1A: VARIATION OF INTER-ARRIVAL TIME FOR THE FOLLOWING ENTITIES
No. I nter-arri val time Value
1. AT 0.85
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
30/146
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
31/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
3.3 Virtual Stations in the Lu-Kumar Network
3.3.1 Development of Simulation model
The same Lu-Kumar network simulation model is used and it is simulated by using m.file to run
with different parameters. The m.file is shown in Appendix B.
3.3.2 Parameters of the simulation model
Both inter-arrival time and service time are set as the exponential distribution. The exponential
mean of service time for each station is fixed and the exponential mean of inter-arrival time is
varied to achieve the utilization of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95 respectively. This can be achieved
by writing the m.file to simulate with different inter-arrival time. 90% confidence interval is used
when analysing the queuing time for each station as well as the total queuing time.
In this experiment, each observation is made up of 32 samples. Each batch of sample consists of
200,000 data points (sample size) and the first 400,000 data points are neglected as a warm up
samples. A warm up is used to allow the system to reach steady-state before the system behaviour
is analysed.
3.3.3 Parameters of virtual stations
To investigate the nature of virtual stations in the Lu-Kumar network, the service time of virtual
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
32/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
To observe the effect of varying the service time of m1 and m3, the service times are varied as
shown in Table 3.But the total average service time of each station including the virtual stations is
kept constant mean value of 0.8.
TABLE 3: VARIATION OF SERVICE TIME OF ALL SERVICE CENTRES
7 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0
8 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0
9 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0
Combination
B
Station A Station B
m1 m4 m2 m3
1 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0
2 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.1
3 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.2
4 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3
5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
6 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
33/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
3.4 Merged Queue at Service Centre B of the Lu-Kumar network
3.4.1 Development of Simulation model
The Lu-Kumar network model is updated at service centre B in such a way that buffer at m2 and
buffer at m3 are merged into one more buffer as shown in Fig. 14.
The m.file is written so that the model can be simulated with different parameters. The m.file is
shown in the appendix B.
3.4.2 Parameters of the simulation model
The mean value of exponential service time for m2 and m3 are varied as follow.
TABLE 4: COMBINATION OF M2 AND M3 VARIATION
Combination m2 m3
1. 0 0.8
2. 0.1 0.7
3. 0.2 0.6
4. 0.25 0.55
5. 0.3 0.5
6. 0.35 0.45
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
34/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
samples. The total queue time is compared to the queue time of MM1 model respectively and
graph of the ratio of total queue time to MM1 queue time vs. the service time variation is plotted.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
35/146
26 | P a g e
Figure 14, Simulation model of merged queue at station B.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
36/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Stability region of the Lu-Kumar network
4.1.1 Simulation Result, deterministic inter-arrival time
The stability region of the Lu-Kumar network is identified when both inter-arrival time andservice time are deterministic. The total queue time of first 30 samples with different inter-arrival
time is shown in Fig. 15 and 16.The former shows total queue time of the stable network and the
latter shows the total queue time of the unstable network. The total queue time of unstable
network is increasing with time. Thus, the system is stable when
0.8 ≤
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
37/146
28 | P a g e
Figure 15, Total queue time of first 30th samples of stable system.
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
t o t a l q u e u e t i m e
nth samples
AT=1.6
AT=1.5
AT=1.4
AT=1.3
AT=1.2
AT=1.1
AT=0.8
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
38/146
29 | P a g e
Figure 16, Total queue time of first 30 samples of unstable system.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
t o t a l q u
e u e t i m e
nth samples
AT=0.7
AT=0.69
AT=0.79
AT=0.9
AT=1
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
39/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
4.1.2 Book Keeping
4.1.2.1 Inter-arrival time =0.8
The manual book keeping for inter-arrival time of 0.8 is shown in Table 5. When the 2 nd entity is
generated, the 1st entity is at m3. After m3 has served 1 st entity and 1st entity has already reached
in front of m4, m1 is still serving 2nd entity. Hence, 1st entity has to wait at buffer 4 until 2nd
entity is finished serving by m1 even though m4 is priority. When m1 has served 2 nd entity, 2nd
entity goes to m2. Thus, m2 serves 2nd entity and m4 serves 1st entity simultaneously even though
m2 and m4 are virtual stations (ghost machines). It is highlighted with blue colour in the table
when virtual stations serve the jobs simultaneously. Thus, this network is stable because virtual
stations work simultaneously and synchronization occurs even though inter-arrival time is 0.8.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
40/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
TABLE 5: BOOK KEEPING FOR INTER-ARRIVAL TIME =0.8
Time Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out
0 1st 1st (0)
0.2 1st (0.2) 1st (0)
0.8 2nd 2nd (0) 1st (0.6) 1st (0)
0.9 2nd (0.1) 1st (0.1) 1st (0)
1 2nd (0.2) 2nd (0) 1st (0)
1.5 2nd (0.5) 1st (0.5)
1.6 3rd 3rd (0) 2nd (0.6) 2nd (0) 1st (0.6) 1st
1.7 3rd (0.1) 2nd (0.1) 2nd (0)
1.8 3rd (0.2) 3rd (0) 2nd (0)
2.3 3rd (0.5) 2nd (0.5)
2.4 4th 4th (0) 3rd (0.6) 3rd (0) 2nd (0.6) 2nd
2.5 4th (0.1) 3rd (0.1) 3rd (0)
2.6 4th (0.2) 4th (0) 3rd (0)
3.1 4th (0.5) 3rd (0.5)
3.2 5th 5th (0) 4th (0.6) 4th (0) 3rd (0.6) 3rd
3.3 5th (0.1) 4th (0.1) 4th (0)
3.4 5th (0.2) 5th (0) 4th (0)
3.9 5th (0.5) 4th (0.5)
4 6th 6th (0) 5th (0.6) 5th (0) 4th (0.6) 4th
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
41/146
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
42/146
33 | P a g e
6.9 0.1 4th(0.1),5th(0),6th(0),7th(0) 4th (0)
7 0.1 1 8th 8th(0) 5th(0.1),6th(0),7th(0) 4th (0.1), 5th (0)
7.1 0.1 8th(0) 6th(0.1),7th(0) 4th (0.2), 5th (0), 6th (0)
7.2 0.1 8th(0) 7th(0.1) 4th (0.3), 5th (0), 6th (0), 7th (0)
7.5 0.3 8th(0) 4th (0.6), 5th (0), 6th (0), 7th (0) 4th
8 0.5 1 9th 8th(0),9th(0) 5th (0.5), 6th (0), 7th (0)
8.1 0.1 8th(0),9th(0) 5th (0.6), 6th (0), 7th (0) 5th
8.7 0.6 8th(0),9th(0) 6th (0.6), 7th (0) 6th
9 0.3 1 10th 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0) 7th (0.3)
9.3 0.3 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0) 7th (0.6) 7th
9.5 0.2 8th(0.2),9th(0),10th(0) 8th(0)
9.7 0.2 9th(0.2),10th(0) 8th(0.2),9th(0)
9.9 0.2 10th(0.2) 8th(0.4),9th(0),10th(0)
10 0.1 1 11th 11th(0) 8th(0.5),9th(0),10th(0)
10.1 0.1 11th(0.1) 8th(0.6),9th(0),10th(0) 8th (0)
10.2 0.1 11th(0.2) 9th(0.1),10th(0),11th(0) 8th (0)
10.7 0.5
0
.
7
9th(0.6),10th(0),11th(0) 8th(0),9th(0)
11 0.3 1 12th 12th(0) 10th(0.3),11th(0) 8th(0),9th(0)
11.2 0.2 12th(0.2) 10th(0.5),11th(0),12th(0) 8th(0),9th(0)
11.3 0.1 10th(0.6),11th(0),12th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0)
11.9 0.6
0
.
9
11th(0.6),12th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0)
12 0.1 1 13th 13th(0) 12th(0.1) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0)
12.2 0.2 13th(0.2) 12th(0.3),13th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0)
12.5 0.3 12th(0.6),13th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0)
13 0.5 1 14th 14th(0) 13th(0.5) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0)
13.1 0.1 14th(0.1) 13th(0.6) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0)
13.2 0.1 14th(0.2) 14th(0) 8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0)
13.8 0.6 14th(0.6)8th(0),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),
14th(0)
13.9 0.18th(0.1),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),
13th(0),14th(0)8th(0)
14 0.1 1 15th 15th(0) 9th(0.1),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0)
8th(0.1),9th(0)
14.1 0.1 15th(0) 10th(0.1),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0) 8th(0.2),9th(0),10th(0)
14.2 0.1 15th(0) 11th(0.1),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0) 8th(0.3),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0)
14.3 0.1 15th(0) 12th(0.1),13th(0),14th(0) 8th(0.4),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0)
14.4 0.1 15th(0) 13th(0.1),14th(0)8th(0.5),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),
13th(0)
14.5 0.1 15th(0) 14th(0.1) 8th(0.6),9th(0),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0), 8th
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
43/146
34 | P a g e
13th(0),14th(0)
15 0.5 1 16th 15th(0),16th(0)9th(0.5),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),
14th(0)
15.1 0.1 15th(0),16th(0)9th(0.6),10th(0),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),
14th(0)9th
15.7 0.6 15th(0),16th(0) 10th(0.6),11th(0),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0) 10th
16 0.3 1 17th 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0) 11th(0.3),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0)
16.3 0.3 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0) 11th(0.6),12th(0),13th(0),14th(0) 11th
16.9 0.6 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0) 12th(0.6),13th(0),14th(0) 12th17 0.1 1 18th 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0) 13th(0.1),14th(0)
17.5 0.5 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0) 13th(0.6),14th(0) 13th
18 0.5 1 19th 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 14th(0.5)
18.1 0.1 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 14th(0.6) 14th
18.3 0.2 15th(0.2),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 15th(0)
18.5 0.2 16th(0.2),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 15th(0.2),16th(0)
18.7 0.2 17th(0.2),18th(0),19th(0) 15th(0.4),16th(0),17th(0)
18.9 0.2 18th(0.2),19th(0) 15th(0.6),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0) 15th(0)
19 0.1 1 20th 19th(0.1),20th(0) 16th(0.1),17th(0),18th(0) 15th(0)
19.1 0.1 19th(0.2),20th(0) 16th(0.2),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0) 15th(0)
19.3 0.2 20th(0.2) 16th(0.4),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 15th(0)
19.5 0.2 16th(0.6),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 15th(0),16th(0)
20 0.5 1 21st 21st(0) 17th(0.5),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 15th(0),16th(0)20.1 0.1 21st(0.1) 17th(0.6),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0)
20.2 0.1 21st(0.2) 18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0)
20.8 0.6 18th(0.6),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0)
21 0.2 1 22nd 22nd(0) 19th(0.2),20th(0),21st(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0)
21.2 0.2 22nd(0.2) 19th(0.4),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0)
21.4 0.2 19th(0.6),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0)
22 0.6 1 23rd 23rd(0) 20th(0.6),21st(0),22nd(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0)
22.2 0.2 23rd(0.2) 21st(0.2),22nd(0),23rd(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0)
22.6 0.4 21st(0.6),22nd(0),23rd(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0),21st(0)
23 0.4 1 24th 24th(0) 22nd(0.4),23rd(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0),21st(0)
23.2 0.2 24th(0.2) 22nd(0.6),23rd(0),24th(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0)
23.8 0.6 23rd(0.6),24th(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)
24 0.2 1 25th 25th(0) 24th(0.2)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)
24.2 0.2 25th(0.2) 24th(0.4),25th(0) 15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
44/146
35 | P a g e
20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)
24.4 0.2 24th(0.6),25th(0)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0)
25 0.6 1 26th 26th(0) 25th(0.6)15th(0),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th
(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0)
25.1 0.1 26th(0.1)
15th(0.1),16th(0),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),
20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),
25th(0)
15th(0)
25.2 0.1 26th(0.2) 26th(0)
16th(0.1),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),
21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 15th(0),16th(0)
25.8 0.6 26th(0.6)17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),
22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)15th(0.6),16th(0) 15th
25.9 0.117th(0.1),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),
22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.1),17th(0)
26 0.1 1 27th 27th(0)18th(0.1),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),
23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.2),17th(0),18th(0)
26.1 0.1 27th(0)19th(0.1),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),
24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.3),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0)
26.2 0.1 27th(0)20th(0.1),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),
25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.4),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0)
26.3 0.1 27th(0)21st(0.1),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),
26th(0)
16th(0.5),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),
21st(0)
26.4 0.1 27th(0) 22nd(0.1),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)16th(0.6),17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),
21st(0),22nd(0)16th
26.5 0.1 27th(0) 23rd(0.1),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)17th(0.1),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),
22nd(0),23rd(0)
26.6 0.1 27th(0) 24th(0.1),25th(0),26th(0)17th(0.2),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),
22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0)
26.7 0.1 27th(0) 25th(0.1),26th(0)17th(0.3),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),
22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0)
26.8 0.1 27th(0) 26th(0.1)17th(0.4),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),
22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)
27 0.2 1 28th 27th(0),28th(0)17th(0.6),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),
22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)17th
27.6 0.6 27th(0),28th(0)18th(0.6),19th(0),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),
23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)18th
28 0.4 1 29th 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)19th(0.4),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),
24th(0),25th(0),26th(0)
28.2 0.2 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)
19th(0.6),20th(0),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),
24th(0),25th(0),26th(0) 19th
28.8 0.6 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)20th(0.6),21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),
25th(0),26th(0)20th
29 0.2 1 30th 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)21st(0.2),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),
26th(0)
29.4 0.4 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)21st(0.6),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),
26th(0)21st
30 0.6 1 31st 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0) 22nd(0.6),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0) 22nd
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
45/146
36 | P a g e
30.6 0.6 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0) 23rd(0.6),24th(0),25th(0),26th(0) 23rd
31 0.4 1 32nd 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0) 24th(0.4),25th(0),26th(0)
31.2 0.2 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0) 24th(0.6),25th(0),26th(0) 24th
31.8 0.6 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0) 25th(0.6),26th(0) 25th
32 0.2 1 33rd27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0)26th(0.2)
32.4 0.427th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0)26th(0.6) 26th
32.6 0.2 27th(0.2),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0)
27th(0)
32.8 0.228th(0.2),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0)27th(0.2),28th(0)
33 0.2 1 34th29th(0.2),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),
34th(0)27th(0.4),28th(0),29th(0)
33.2 0.2 30th(0.2),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0) 27th(0.6),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 27th(0)
33.4 0.2 31st(0.2),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0) 28th(0.2),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0) 27th(0)
33.6 0.2 32nd(0.2),33rd(0),34th(0) 28th(0.4),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0) 27th(0)
33.8 0.2 33rd(0.2),34th(0) 28th(0.6),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0) 27th(0),28th(0)
34 0.2 1 35th 34th(0.2),35th(0) 29th(0.2),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0) 27th(0),28th(0)
34.2 0.2 35th(0.2)29th(0.4),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),
35th(0)27th(0),28th(0)
34.4 0.229th(0.6),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),
35th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)
35 0.6 1 36th 36th(0) 30th(0.6),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)
35.2 0.2 36th(0.2) 31st(0.2),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)
35.6 0.4 31st(0.6),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0)
36 0.4 1 37th 37th(0) 32nd(0.4),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0)
36.2 0.2 37th(0.2) 32nd(0.6),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0)
36.8 0.6 33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0)
37 0.2 1 38th 38th(0) 34th(0.2),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0)
37.2 0.2 38th(0.2) 34th(0.4),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0)
37.4 0.2 34th(0.6),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0)
38 0.6 1 39th 39th(0) 35th(0.6),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0) 27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)
38.2 0.2 39th(0.2) 36th(0.2),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)
38.6 0.4 36th(0.6),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)
39 0.4 1 40th 40th(0) 37th(0.4),38th(0),39th(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
46/146
37 | P a g e
39.2 0.2 40th(0.2) 37th(0.6),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0)
39.8 0.6 38th(0.6),39th(0),40th(0)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0)
40 0.2 1 41st 41st(0) 39th(0.2),40th(0)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0)
40.2 0.2 41st(0.2) 39th(0.4),40th(0),41st(0)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0)
40.4 0.2 39th(0.6),40th(0),41st(0)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0)
41 0.6 1 42nd 42nd(0) 40th(0.6),41st(0)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)
41.2 0.2 42nd(0.2) 41st(0.2),42nd(0)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)
41.6 0.4 41st(0.6),42nd(0)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)
42 0.4 1 43rd 43rd(0) 42nd(0.4)27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)
42.2 0.2 43rd(0.2) 42nd(0.6),43rd(0)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),
42nd(0)
42.8 0.6 43rd(0.6)
27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),
42nd(0),43rd(0)
42.9 0.1
27th(0.1),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),
42nd(0),43rd(0)
27th(0)
43 0.1 1 44th 44th(0)28th(0.1),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),
38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),
43rd(0)
27th(0.1),28th(0)
43.1 0.1 44th(0)
29th(0.1),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),
34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),
39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
27th(0.2),28th(0),29th(0)
43.2 0.1 44th(0)30th(0.1),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),
35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),27th(0.3),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
47/146
38 | P a g e
40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
43.3 0.1 44th(0)
31st(0.1),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),
36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),
41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
27th(0.4),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0)
43.4 0.1 44th(0)
32nd(0.1),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),
42nd(0),43rd(0)
27th(0.5),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0)
43.5 0.1 44th(0)
33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),
38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),
43rd(0)
27th(0.6),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),
32nd(0),33rd(0)
27th
43.6 0.1 44th(0)34th(0.1),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),
39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
28th(0.1),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0),34th(0)
43.7 0.1 44th(0)35th(0.1),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),
40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
28th(0.2),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)
43.8 0.1 44th(0)36th(0.1),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),
41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
28th(0.3),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)
43.9 0.1 44th(0)37th(0.1),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),
42nd(0),43rd(0)
28th(0.4),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0)
44 0.1 1 45th 44th(0),45th(0)38th(0.1),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),
43rd(0)
28th(0.5),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),
38th(0)
44.1 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 39th(0.1),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
28th(0.6),29th(0),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),
33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),
38th(0),39th(0)
28th
44.2 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 40th(0.1),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)29th(0.1),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),
39th(0),40th(0)
44.3 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 41st(0.1),42nd(0),43rd(0)
29th(0.2),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),
34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),
39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)
44.4 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 42nd(0.1),43rd(0)
29th(0.3),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),
34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),
39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0)
44.5 0.1 44th(0),45th(0) 43rd(0.1)
29th(0.4),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),
34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),
39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
44.7 0.2
0
.
7
44th(0),45th(0)
29th(0.6),30th(0),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),
34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),
39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
29th
45 0.3 1 46th 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)30th(0.3),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),
40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
45.3 0.3 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)
30th(0.6),31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),
35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),
40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
30th
45.9 0.6 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)31st(0.6),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),
36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),31st
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
48/146
39 | P a g e
41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
46 0.1 1 47th 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)
32nd(0.1),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),
42nd(0),43rd(0)
46.5 0.5 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)
32nd(0.6),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),
37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),
42nd(0),43rd(0)
32nd
47 0.5 1 48th 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)
33rd(0.5),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),
38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),
43rd(0)
47.1 0.1 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)
33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),
38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),
43rd(0)
33rd
47.7 0.6
0
.
7
44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)34th(0.6),35th(0),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),
39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)34th
48 0.3 1 49th 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0)35th(0.3),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),
40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)
48.3 0.3 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0)35th(0.6),36th(0),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),
40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)35th
48.9 0.6 44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0)36th(0.6),37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),
41st(0),42nd(0),43rd(0)36th
49 0.1 1 50th44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0),
50th(0)
37th(0.1),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),
42nd(0),43rd(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
49/146
40 | P a g e
Figure 17, WIP growth in front of class 2 and class 4 of the unstable network with IA=1.0
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
W I P
Time
Class 2 Class 4
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
50/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
4.1.2.3 Inter-arrival time=1.1
Manual book keeping for inter-arrival time=1.1 is shown in Table 7. This system is stable
because of similar behaviour which is m2 and m4 (ghost machines) serve simultaneously even
though they are virtual stations. It is also highlighted with blue colour when virtual stations work
simultaneously.
TABLE 7: BOOK KEEPING FOR INTER-ARRIVAL TIME= 1.1
Time Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out
0 1st 1st (0)
0.2 1st (0.2) 1st (0)
0.8 1st (0.6) 1st (0)
0.9 1st (0.1) 1st (0)
1.1 2nd 2nd (0) 1st (0.2)
1.5 2nd (0) 1st (0.6) 1st (0)
1.7 2nd (0.2) 2nd (0)
2.2 3rd 3rd (0) 2nd (0.5)
2.3 3rd (0.1) 2nd (0.6) 2nd (0)
2.4 3rd (0.2) 3rd (0) 2nd (0.1) 2nd (0)
3 3rd (0.6) 3rd (0) 2nd (0.6) 2nd (0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
51/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
7.5 7th (0.1) 7th (0)
7.7 8th 8th (0) 7th (0.2)8.1 8th (0) 7th (0.6) 7th (0)
8.3 8th (0.2) 8th (0)
8.8 9th 9th (0) 8th (0.5)
8.9 9th (0.1) 8th (0.6) 8th (0)
9 9th (0.2) 9th (0) 8th (0.1) 8th (0)
9.6 9th (0.6) 9th (0) 8th (0.6) 8th (0)
9.7 9th (0.1) 9th (0)9.9 10th 10th (0) 9th (0.2)
10.3 10th (0) 9th (0.6) 9th (0)
4.1.2.4 Inter-arrival time=1.2
There are two scenarios for inter-arrival time=1.2 case.
One results in unstable system. This is due to the virtual stations that do not serve the entities
simultaneously. Book-keeping for this unstable system is shown in Table 8. At time=9.8,
machine, m2 just finish serving 8 th entity and simultaneously, machine, m1 also just finish
serving 9th entity. At the moment, 7th entity is already waiting at machine, m3 and thus, 8th entity
will join the queue behind 7th entity at m3 while 9
th entity will be at the entry of m2. Since m2 is
the priority buffer compared to m3, m2 will serve the 9 th entity even though 7th entity is already
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
52/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
When m3 finished serving 7th entity, m2 will serve the waiting 9th entity while m4 will serve the
incoming 7th entity. This is when each virtual station serves each respective job simultaneously.
The following cycle will continue repeating thereby, synchronizing virtual stations. That results
in a stable network. Inside the book-keeping, it is highlighted with blue colour when virtual
stations work simultaneously. Fig. 19 shows the growth of WIP in front of virtual stations in the
stable network. It can be seen that the maximum WIP for each machine is kept at a constant of
two jobs all the time.
The main objective of above simulation is to study the buffer effects in a marginally stable
system. The buffer effect is found to stabilize a marginally stable system. Please take note that the
buffer effects of subsequent book-keeping have been eliminated.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
53/146
44 | P a g e
TABLE 8: BOOK KEEPING FOR UNSTABLE NETWORK WITH INTER-ARRIVAL TIME =1.2
TimeTime
diffIA Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out
0 1st 1st(0)
0.2 0.2 1st(0.2) 1st(0)
0.8 0.6 1st(0.6) 1st(0)
0.9 0.1 0.9 1st(0.1) 1st(0)
1.2 0.3 1.2 2nd 2nd(0) 1st(0.3)1.5 0.3 2nd(0) 1st(0.6) 1st
1.7 0.2 2nd(0.2) 2nd(0)
2.3 0.6 1.1 2nd(0.6) 2nd(0)
2.4 0.1 1.2 3rd 3rd(0) 2nd(0.1) 2nd(0)
3 0.6 3rd(0) 2nd(0.6) 2nd
3.2 0.2 0.8 3rd(0.2) 3rd(0)
3.6 0.4 1.2 4th 4th(0) 3rd(0.4)
3.8 0.2 4th(0.2) 3rd(0.6),4th(0) 3rd(0)
4.4 0.6 0.8 4th(0.6) 3rd(0),4th(0)
4.5 0.1 3rd(0.1),4th(0) 3rd(0)
4.6 0.1 1 4th(0.1) 3rd(0.1),4th(0)
4.8 0.2 1.2 5th 5th(0) 3rd(0.3),4th(0)
5.1 0.3 5th(0) 3rd(0.6),4th(0) 3rd5.7 0.6 0.9 5th(0) 4th(0.6) 4th
5.9 0.2 0.8 5th(0.2) 5th(0)
6 0.1 1.2 6th 6th(0) 5th(0.1)
6.2 0.2 6th(0.2) 5th(0.3),6th(0)
6.5 0.3 5th(0.6),6th(0) 5th(0)
7.1 0.6 1.1 6th(0.6) 5th(0),6th(0)
7.2 0.1 1.2 7th 7th(0) 5th(0.1),6th(0) 5th(0)
7.7 0.5 7th(0) 6th(0.1) 5th(0.1),6th(0)
7.8 0.1 7th(0) 5th(0.6),6th(0) 5th
8.4 0.6 1.2 8th 7th(0),8th(0) 6th(0.6) 6th
8.6 0.2 7th(0.2),8th(0) 7th(0)
8.8 0.2 8th(0.2) 7th(0.2),8th(0)
9.2 0.4 0.8 7th(0.6),8th(0) 7th(0)
9.6 0.4 1.2 9th 9th(0) 8th(0.4) 7th(0)
9.8 0.2 9th(0.2) 8th(0.6),9th(0) 7th(0),8th(0)
10.4 0.6 0.8 9th(0.6) 7th(0),8th(0),9th(0)
10.5 0.1 7th(0.1),8th(0),9th(0) 7th(0)
10.6 0.1 8th(0.1),9th(0) 7th(0.1),8th(0)
10.7 0.1 1.1 9th(0.1) 7th(0.2),8th(0),9th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
54/146
45 | P a g e
10.8 0.1 1.2 10th 10th(0) 7th(0.3),8th(0),9th(0)
11.1 0.3 10th(0) 7th(0.6),8th(0),9th(0) 7th
11.7 0.6 0.9 10th(0) 8th(0.6),9th(0) 8th
12 0.3 1.2 11th 10th(0),11th(0) 9th(0.3)
12.3 0.3 10th(0),11th(0) 9th(0.6) 9th
12.5 0.2 10th(0.2),11th(0) 10th(0)
12.7 0.2 0.7 11th(0.2) 10th(0.2),11th(0)
13.1 0.4 0.8 10th(0.6),11th(0) 10th(0)
13.2 0.1 1.2 12th 12th(0) 11th(0.1) 10th(0)
13.4 0.2 12th(0.2) 11th(0.3),12th(0) 10th(0)
13.7 0.3 11th(0.6),12th(0) 10th(0),11th(0)
14.3 0.6 1.1 12th(0.6) 10th(0),11th(0),12th(0)
14.4 0.1 1.2 13th 13th(0) 10th(0.1),11th(0),12th(0) 10th(0)
14.5 0.1 13th(0) 11th(0.1),12th(0) 10th(0.1),11th(0)
14.6 0.1 13th(0) 12th(0.1) 10th(0.2),11th(0),12th(0)
15 0.4 0.6 13th(0) 10th(0.6),11th(0),12th(0) 10th
15.6 0.6 1.2 14th 13th(0),14th(0) 11th(0.6),12th(0) 11th
16.2 0.6 13th(0),14th(0) 12th(0.6) 12th
16.4 0.2 13th(0.2),14th(0) 13th(0)
16.6 0.2 1 14th(0.2) 13th(0.2),14th(0)
16.8 0.2 1.2 15th 15th(0) 13th(0.4),14th(0)
17 0.2 15th(0.2) 13th(0.6),14th(0),15th(0) 13th(0)
17.6 0.6 0.8 14th(0.6),15th(0) 13th(0),14th(0)
18 0.4 1.2 16th 16th(0) 15th(0.4) 13th(0),14th(0)
18.2 0.2 16th(0.2) 15th(0.6),16th(0) 13th(0),14th(0),15th(0)
18.8 0.6 0.8 16th(0.6) 13th(0),14th(0),15th(0),16th(0)
18.9 0.1 13th(0.1),14th(0),15th(0),16th(0) 13th(0)
19 0.1 14th(0.1),15th(0),16th(0) 13th(0.1),14th(0)
19.1 0.1 15th(0.1),16th(0) 13th(0.2),14th(0),15th(0)
19.2 0.1 1.2 17th 17th(0) 16th(0.1) 13th(0.3),14th(0),15th(0),16th(0)
19.5 0.3 17th(0) 13th(0.6),14th(0),15th(0),16th(0) 13th
20.1 0.6 0.9 17th(0) 14th(0.6),15th(0),16th(0) 14th
20.4 0.3 1.2 18th 17th(0),18th(0) 15th(0.3),16th(0)
20.7 0.3 17th(0),18th(0) 15th(0.6),16th(0) 15th
21.3 0.6 17th(0),18th(0) 16th(0.6) 16th
21.5 0.2 1.1 17th(0.2),18th(0) 17th(0)
21.6 0.1 1.2 19th 18th(0.1),19th(0) 17th(0.1)
21.7 0.1 18th(0.2),19th(0) 17th(0.2),18th(0)
21.9 0.2 19th(0.2) 17th(0.4),18th(0),19th(0)
22.1 0.2 17th(0.6),18th(0),19th(0) 17th(0)
22.7 0.6 1.1 18th(0.6),19th(0) 17th(0),18th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
55/146
46 | P a g e
22.8 0.1 1.2 20th 20th(0) 19th(0.1) 17th(0),18th(0)
23 0.2 20th(0.2) 19th(0.3),20th(0) 17th(0),18th(0)
23.3 0.3 19th(0.6),20th(0) 17th(0),18th(0),19th(0)
23.9 0.6 1.1 20th(0.6) 17th(0),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0)
24 0.1 1.2 21st 21st(0) 17th(0.1),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 17th(0)
24.1 0.1 21st(0) 18th(0.1),19th(0),20th(0) 17th(0.1),18th(0)
24.2 0.1 21st(0) 19th(0.1),20th(0) 17th(0.2),18th(0),19th(0)
24.3 0.1 21st(0) 20th(0.1) 17th(0.3),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0)
24.6 0.3 21st(0) 17th(0.6),18th(0),19th(0),20th(0) 17th
25.2 0.6 1.2 22nd 21st(0),22nd(0) 18th(0.6),19th(0),20th(0) 18th
25.8 0.6 21st(0),22nd(0) 19th(0.6),20th(0) 19th
26.4 0.6 1.2 23rd 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0) 20th(0.6) 20th
26.6 0.2 21st(0.2),22nd(0),23rd(0) 21st(0)
26.8 0.2 22nd(0.2),23rd(0) 21st(0.2),22nd(0)
27 0.2 23rd(0.2) 21st(0.4),22nd(0),23rd(0)
27.2 0.2 0.8 21st(0.6),22nd(0),23rd(0) 21st(0)
27.6 0.4 1.2 24th 24th(0) 22nd(0.4),23rd(0) 21st(0)
27.8 0.2 24th(0.2) 22nd(0.6),23rd(0),24th(0) 21st(0),22nd(0)
28.4 0.6 0.8 23rd(0.6),24th(0) 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)
28.8 0.4 1.2 25th 25th(0) 24th(0.4) 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0)
29 0.2 25th(0.2) 24th(0.6),25th(0) 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0)
29.6 0.6 25th(0.6) 21st(0),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0)
29.7 0.1 21st(0.1),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 21st(0)
29.8 0.1 22nd(0.1),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 21st(0.1),22nd(0)
29.9 0.1 1.1 23rd(0.1),24th(0),25th(0) 21st(0.2),22nd(0),23rd(0)
30 0.1 1.2 26th 26th(0) 24th(0.1),25th(0) 21st(0.3),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0)
30.1 0.1 26th(0) 25th(0.1) 21st(0.4),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0)
30.3 0.2 26th(0) 21st(0.6),22nd(0),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 21st
30.9 0.6 0.9 26th(0) 22nd(0.6),23rd(0),24th(0),25th(0) 22nd
31.2 0.3 1.2 27th 26th(0),27th(0) 23rd(0.3),24th(0),25th(0)
31.5 0.3 26th(0),27th(0) 23rd(0.6),24th(0),25th(0) 23rd
32.1 0.6 0.9 26th(0),27th(0) 24th(0.6),25th(0) 24th
32.4 0.3 1.2 28th 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0) 25th(0.3)
32.7 0.3 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0) 25th(0.6) 25th
32.9 0.2 26th(0.2),27th(0),28th(0) 26th(0)
33.1 0.2 27th(0.2),28th(0) 26th(0.2),27th(0)
33.3 0.2 0.9 28th(0.2) 26th(0.4),27th(0),28th(0)
33.5 0.2 26th(0.6),27th(0),28th(0) 26th(0)
33.6 0.1 1.2 29th 29th(0) 27th(0.1),28th(0) 26th(0)
33.8 0.2 29th(0.2) 27th(0.3),28th(0),29th(0) 26th(0)
34.1 0.3 27th(0.6),28th(0),29th(0) 26th(0),27th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
56/146
47 | P a g e
34.7 0.6 1.1 28th(0.6),29th(0) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0)
34.8 0.1 1.2 30th 30th(0) 29th(0.1) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0)
35 0.2 30th(0.2) 29th(0.3),30th(0) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0)
35.3 0.3 29th(0.6),30th(0) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)
35.9 0.6 1.1 30th(0.6) 26th(0),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)
36 0.1 1.2 31st 31st(0) 26th(0.1),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 26th(0)
36.1 0.1 31st(0) 27th(0.1),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 26th(0.1),27th(0)
36.2 0.1 31st(0) 28th(0.1),29th(0),30th(0) 26th(0.2),27th(0),28th(0)
36.3 0.1 31st(0) 29th(0.1),30th(0) 26th(0.3),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0)
36.4 0.1 31st(0) 30th(0.1) 26th(0.4),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0)
36.6 0.2 0.6 31st(0) 26th(0.6),27th(0),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 26th
37.2 0.6 1.2 32nd 31st(0),32nd(0) 27th(0.6),28th(0),29th(0),30th(0) 27th
37.8 0.6 31st(0),32nd(0) 28th(0.6),29th(0),30th(0) 28th
38.4 0.6 1.2 33rd 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0) 29th(0.6),30th(0) 29th
39 0.6 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0) 30th(0.6) 30th
39.2 0.2 31st(0.2),32nd(0),33rd(0) 31st(0)
39.4 0.2 32nd(0.2),33rd(0) 31st(0.2),32nd(0)
39.6 0.2 1.2 34th 33rd(0.2),34th(0) 31st(0.4),32nd(0),33rd(0)
39.8 0.2 34th(0.2) 31st(0.6),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0) 31st(0)
40.4 0.6 0.8 32nd(0.6),33rd(0),34th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0)
40.8 0.4 1.2 35th 35th(0) 33rd(0.4),34th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0)
41 0.2 35th(0.2) 33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0)
41.6 0.6 34th(0.6),35th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0)
42 0.4 1.2 36th 36th(0) 35th(0.4) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0)
42.2 0.2 36th(0.2) 35th(0.6),36th(0) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)
42.8 0.6 0.8 36th(0.6) 31st(0),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)
42.9 0.1 31st(0.1),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 31st(0)
43 0.1 32nd(0.1),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 31st(0.1),32nd(0)
43.1 0.1 33rd(0.1),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 31st(0.2),32nd(0),33rd(0)
43.2 0.1 1.2 37th 37th(0) 34th(0.1),35th(0),36th(0) 31st(0.3),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0)
43.3 0.1 37th(0) 35th(0.1),36th(0) 31st(0.4),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0)
43.4 0.1 37th(0) 36th(0.1) 31st(0.5),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)
43.5 0.1 37th(0) 31st(0.6),32nd(0),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 31st
44.1 0.6 0.9 37th(0) 32nd(0.6),33rd(0),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 32nd
44.4 0.3 1.2 38th 37th(0),38th(0) 33rd(0.3),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0)
44.7 0.3 37th(0),38th(0) 33rd(0.6),34th(0),35th(0),36th(0) 33rd
45.3 0.6 0.9 37th(0),38th(0) 34th(0.6),35th(0),36th(0) 34th
45.6 0.3 1.2 39th 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0) 35th(0.3),36th(0)
45.9 0.3 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0) 35th(0.6),36th(0) 35th
46.5 0.6 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0) 36th(0.6) 36th
46.7 0.2 1.1 37th(0.2),38th(0),39th(0) 37th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
57/146
48 | P a g e
46.8 0.1 1.2 40th 38th(0.1),39th(0),40th(0) 37th(0.1)
46.9 0.1 38th(0.2),39th(0),40th(0) 37th(0.2),38th(0)
47.1 0.2 39th(0.2),40th(0) 37th(0.4),38th(0),39th(0)
47.3 0.2 40th(0.2) 37th(0.6),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0) 37th(0)
47.9 0.6 1.1 38th(0.6),39th(0),40th(0) 37th(0),38th(0)
48 0.1 1.2 41st 41st(0) 39th(0.1),40th(0) 37th(0),38th(0)
48.2 0.2 41st(0.2) 39th(0.3),40th(0),41st(0) 37th(0),38th(0)
48.5 0.3 39th(0.6),40th(0),41st(0) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0)
49.1 0.6 1.1 40th(0.6),41st(0) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)
49.2 0.1 1.2 42nd 42nd(0) 41st(0.1) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)
49.4 0.2 42nd(0.2) 41st(0.3),42nd(0) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)
49.7 0.3 41st(0.6),42nd(0) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)
50.3 0.6 1.1 42nd(0.6) 37th(0),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0)
50.4 0.1 1.2 43rd 43rd(0) 37th(0.1),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th(0)
50.5 0.1 43rd(0) 38th(0.1),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th(0.1),38th(0)
50.6 0.1 43rd(0) 39th(0.1),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th(0.2),38th(0),39th(0)
50.7 0.1 43rd(0) 40th(0.1),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th(0.3),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0)
50.8 0.1 43rd(0) 41st(0.1),42nd(0) 37th(0.4),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0)
50.9 0.1 43rd(0) 42nd(0.1) 37th(0.5),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0)
51 0.1 0.6 0 43rd(0) 37th(0.6),38th(0),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 37th
51.6 0.6 1.2 44th 43rd(0),44th(0) 38th(0.6),39th(0),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 38th
52.2 0.6 43rd(0),44th(0) 39th(0.6),40th(0),41st(0),42nd(0) 39th
52.8 0.6 1.2 45th 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0) 40th(0.6),41st(0),42nd(0) 40th
53.4 0.6 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0) 41st(0.6),42nd(0) 41st
54 0.6 1.2 46th 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0) 42nd(0.6) 42nd
54.2 0.2 43rd(0.2),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0) 43rd(0)
54.4 0.2 44th(0.2),45th(0),46th(0) 43rd(0.2),44th(0)
54.6 0.2 45th(0.2),46th(0) 43rd(0.4),44th(0),45th(0)
54.8 0.2 0.8 46th(0.2) 43rd(0.6),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0) 43rd(0)
55.2 0.4 1.2 47th 47th(0) 44th(0.4),45th(0),46th(0) 43rd(0)
55.4 0.2 47th(0.2) 44th(0.6),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0)
56 0.6 45th(0.6),46th(0),47th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0)
56.4 0.4 1.2 48th 48th(0) 46th(0.4),47th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0)
56.6 0.2 48th(0.2) 46th(0.6),47th(0),48th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)
57.2 0.6 47th(0.6),48th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)57.6 0.4 1.2 49th 49th(0) 48th(0.4) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)
57.8 0.2 49th(0.2) 48th(0.6),49th(0) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)
58.4 0.6 0.8 49th(0.6) 43rd(0),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0)
58.5 0.1 43rd(0.1),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0)
58.6 0.1 44th(0.1),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0.1),44th(0)
58.7 0.1 45th(0.1),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0.2),44th(0),45th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
58/146
49 | P a g e
58.8 0.1 1.2 50th 50th(0) 46th(0.1),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0.3),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0)
58.9 0.1 50th(0) 47th(0.1),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd(0.4),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0)
59 0.1 50th(0) 48th(0.1),49th(0) 43rd(0.5),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0)
59.1 0.1 50th(0) 49th(0.1) 43rd(0.6),44th(0),45th(0),46th(0),47th(0),48th(0),49th(0) 43rd
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
59/146
50 | P a g e
TABLE 9: BOOK KEEPING FOR STABLE NETWORK WITH INTER-ARRIVAL TIME =1.2
TimeTime
diffIA Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out
Buffer Server Buffer Server Buffer Server Buffer Server0 1st
0 1st(0)
0 1st(0)
0.2 0.2 1st(0.2)
0.2 1st(0)
0.2 1st(0)
0.8 0.6 1st(0.6)
0.8 1st(0)
0.8 1st(0)
0.9 0.1 0.9 1st(0.1)
0.9 1st(0)
0.9 1st(0)
1.2 0.3 1.2 2nd 1st(0.3)
1.2 2nd(0) 1st(0.3)
1.5 0.3 2nd(0) 1st(0.6) 1st
1.5 2nd(0)
1.7 0.2 2nd(0.2)
1.7 2nd(0)
1.7 2nd(0)2.3 0.6 1.1 2nd(0.6)
2.3 2nd(0)
2.3 2nd(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
60/146
51 | P a g e
2.4 0.1 1.2 3rd 2nd(0.1)
2.4 3rd(0) 2nd(0)
2.4 3rd(0) 2nd(0)
3 0.6 3rd(0) 2nd(0.6) 2nd
3 3rd(0)
3.2 0.2 0.8 3rd(0.2)
3.2 3rd(0)
3.2 3rd(0)
3.6 0.4 1.2 4th 3rd(0.4)
3.6 4th(0)
3.6 4th(0)
3.8 0.2 4th(0.2) 3rd(0.6)
3.8 4th(0) 3rd(0)
3.8 4th(0) 3rd(0)
4.4 0.6 0.8 4th(0.6) 3rd(0)
4.4 4th(0) 3rd(0)
4.5 0.1 4th(0) 3rd(0.1)
4.5 4th(0) 3rd(0)
4.5 3rd(0)
4.6 0.1 1 4th(0.1) 3rd(0.1)
4.6 4th(0) 3rd(0.1)
4.8 0.2 1.2 5th 4th(0) 3rd(0.3)
4.8 5th(0) 4th(0) 3rd(0.3)
5.1 0.3 5th(0) 4th(0) 3rd(0.6) 3rd
5.1 5th(0) 4th(0)
5.7 0.6 0.9 5th(0) 4th(0.6) 4th
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
61/146
52 | P a g e
5.7 5th(0)
5.9 0.2 0.8 5th(0.2)
5.9 5th(0)
5.9 5th(0)
6 0.1 1.2 6th 5th(0.1)
6 6th(0) 5th(0.1)
6 6th(0) 5th(0.1)
6.2 0.2 6th(0.2) 5th(0.3)
6.2 6th(0)
6.5 0.3 6th(0) 5th(0.6)
6.5 6th(0) 5th(0)
7.1 0.6 1.1 6th(0.6) 5th(0)
7.1 5th(0),6th(0)
7.1 6th(0) 5th(0)
7.2 0.1 1.2 7th 6th(0) 5th(0.1)
7.2 7th(0) 6th(0) 5th(0)
7.2 7th(0) 6th(0) 5th(0)
7.3 0.1 7th(0) 6th(0.1) 5th(0.1)
7.3 7th(0) 6th(0) 5th(0.1)
7.8 0.5 7th(0) 6th(0) 5th(0.6) 5th
7.8 7th(0) 6th(0)
8.4 0.6 1.2 8th 7th(0) 6th(0.6) 6th
8.4 8th(0) 7th(0)
8.6 0.2 8th(0) 7th(0.2)8.6 8th(0) 7th(0)
8.6 8th(0) 7th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
62/146
53 | P a g e
8.8 0.2 8th(0.2) 7th(0.2)
8.8 8th(0) 7th(0.2)
9.2 0.4 0.8 8th(0) 7th(0.6)
9.2 8th(0) 7th(0)
9.6 0.4 1.2 9th 8th(0.4) 7th(0)
9.6 9th(0) 8th(0.4) 7th(0)
9.6 9th(0) 8th(0.4) 7th(0)
9.8 0.2 9th(0.2) 8th(0.6) 7th(0)
9.8 9th(0) 8th(0) 7th(0)
9.9 0.1 9th(0) 8th(0) 7th(0.1)
9.9 9th(0) 7th(0)
9.9 9th(0) 7th(0)
10.5 0.6 0.9 9th(0.6) 8th(0) 7th(0.6) 7th
10.5 9th(0) 8th(0)
10.6 0.1 9th(0) 8th(0.1)
10.6 9th(0) 8th(0)
10.6 9th(0) 8th(0)
10.7 0.1 9th(0.1) 8th(0.1)
10.7 9th(0) 8th(0.1)
10.8 0.1 1.2 10th 9th(0) 8th(0.2)
10.8 10th(0) 9th(0) 8th(0.2)
11.2 0.4 10th(0) 9th(0) 8th(0.6) 8th
11.2 10th(0) 9th(0)
11.8 0.6 10th(0) 9th(0.6) 9th11.8 10th(0)
12 0.2 1.2 11th 10th(0.2)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
63/146
54 | P a g e
12 11th(0) 10th(0)
12 11th(0) 10th(0)
12.2 0.2 11th(0.2) 10th(0.2)
12.2 11th(0) 10th(0.2)
12.2 11th(0) 10th(0.2)
12.6 0.4 0.6 11th(0) 10th(0.6)
12.6 11th(0) 10th(0)
13.2 0.6 1.2 12th 11th(0.6) 10th(0)
13.2 12th(0) 11th(0) 10th(0)
13.2 12th(0) 10th(0)
13.3 0.1 12th(0.1) 11th(0) 10th(0.1)
13.3 12th(0.1) 11th(0) 10th(0)
13.4 0.1 12th(0.2) 11th(0.1) 10th(0)
13.4 12th(0) 11th(0) 10th(0)
13.4 12th(0) 11th(0) 10th(0)
14 0.6 12th(0.6) 11th(0) 10th(0.6) 10th
14 12th(0) 11th(0)
14 12th(0) 11th(0)
14.1 0.1 0.9 12th(0.1) 11th(0.1)
14.1 12th(0) 11th(0.1)
14.4 0.3 1.2 13th 12th(0) 11th(0.4)
14.4 13th(0) 12th(0) 11th(0.4)
14.6 0.2 13th(0) 12th(0) 11th(0.6) 11th
14.6 13th(0) 12th(0)15.2 0.6 13th(0) 12th(0.6) 12th
15.2 13th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
64/146
55 | P a g e
15.4 0.2 1 13th(0.2)
15.4 13th(0)
15.4 13th(0)
15.6 0.2 1.2 14th 13th(0.2)
15.6 14th(0) 13th(0.2)
15.6 14th(0) 13th(0.2)
15.8 0.2 14th(0.2) 13th(0.4)
15.8 14th(0)
16 0.2 14th(0) 13th(0.6)
16 14th(0) 13th(0)
16.6 0.6 1 14th(0.6) 13th(0)
16.6 14th(0) 13th(0)
16.7 0.1 14th(0) 13th(0.1) 13th(0)
16.7 14th(0) 13th(0)
16.7 13th(0)
16.8 0.1 1.2 15th 14th(0.1) 13th(0.1)
16.8 15th(0) 14th(0) 13th(0.1)
17.3 0.5 15th(0) 14th(0) 13th(0.6) 13th
17.3 15th(0) 14th(0)
17.9 0.6 1.1 15th(0) 14th(0.6) 14th
17.9 15th(0)
18 0.1 1.2 16th 15th(0.1)
18 16th(0) 15th(0.1)
18.1 0.1 16th(0) 15th(0.2)18.1 16th(0) 15th(0)
18.1 16th(0) 15th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
65/146
56 | P a g e
18.3 0.2 16th(0.2) 15th(0.2)
18.3 16th(0) 15th(0.2)
18.7 0.4 0.7 16th(0) 15th(0.6)
18.7 16th(0) 15th(0)
19.2 0.5 1.2 17th 16th(0.5) 15th(0)
19.2 17th(0) 16th(0.5) 15th(0)
19.2 17th(0) 16th(0.5) 15th(0)
19.3 0.1 17th(0.1) 16th(0.6) 15th(0)
19.3 17th(0.1) 16th(0) 15th(0)
19.4 0.1 17th(0.2) 16th(0) 15th(0.1)
19.4 17th(0) 16th(0) 15th(0)
19.4 17th(0) 16th(0) 15th(0)
19.5 0.1 17th(0) 16th(0.1) 15th(0.1)
19.5 17th(0) 16th(0) 15th(0.1)
20 0.5 17th(0.5) 16th(0) 15th(0.6) 15th
20 17th(0.5) 16th(0)
20.1 0.1 17th(0.6) 16th(0.1)
20.1 17th(0) 16th(0.1)
20.1 17th(0) 16th(0.1)
20.2 0.1 1 17th(0.1) 16th(0.2)
20.2 17th(0) 16th(0.2)
20.4 0.2 1.2 18th 17th(0) 16th(0.4)
20.4 18th(0) 17th(0) 16th(0.4)
20.6 0.2 18th(0) 17th(0) 16th(0.6) 16th20.6 18th(0) 17th(0)
21.2 0.6 18th(0) 17th(0.6) 17th
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
66/146
57 | P a g e
21.2 18th(0)
21.4 0.2 1 18th(0.2)
21.4 18th(0)
21.4 18th(0)
21.6 0.2 1.2 19th 18th(0.2)
21.6 19th(0) 18th(0.2)
21.6 19th(0) 18th(0.2)
21.8 0.2 19th(0.2) 18th(0.4)
21.8 19th(0) 18th(0.4)
22 0.2 19th(0) 18th(0.6)
22 19th(0) 18th(0)
22.6 0.6 1 19th(0.6) 18th(0)
22.6 19th(0) 18th(0)
22.7 0.1 0.9 19th(0) 18th(0.1)
22.7 19th(0) 18th(0)
22.7 19th(0) 18th(0)
22.8 0.1 1.2 20th 19th(0.1) 18th(0.1)
22.8 20th(0) 19th(0) 18th(0.1)
23.3 0.5 20th(0) 19th(0) 18th(0.6) 18th
23.3 19th(0)
23.9 0.6 20th(0) 19th(0.6) 19th
23.9 20th(0)
24 0.1 1.2 21st 20th(0.1)
24 21st(0) 20th(0.1)24.1 0.1 21st(0) 20th(0.2)
24.1 21st(0) 20th(0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
67/146
58 | P a g e
24.1 20th(0)
24.3 0.2 21st(0.2) 20th(0.2)
24.7 0.4 0.7 21st(0) 20th(0.6)
24.7 21st(0) 20th(0)
25.2 0.5 1.2 22nd 21st(0.5) 20th(0)25.2 22nd(0) 21st(0.5) 20th(0)
25.2 22nd(0) 21st(0.5) 20th(0)
25.3 0.1 22nd(0.1) 21st(0.6) 20th(0)
25.3 22nd(0.1) 21st(0) 20th(0)
25.4 0.1 22nd(0.2) 21st(0) 20th(0.1)
25.4 22nd(0) 21st(0) 20th(0)
25.4 22nd(0) 21st(0) 20th(0)
25.5 0.1 22nd(0) 21st(0.1) 20th(0.1)
25.4 22nd(0) 21st(0) 20th(0.1)
26 0.5 0.8 22nd(0.5) 21st(0) 20th(0.6) 20th
26 22nd(0.5) 21st(0)
26.1 0.1 22nd(0.6) 21st(0.1)
26.1 22nd(0) 21st(0.1)
26.1 22nd(0) 21st(0.1)
26.2 0.1 1 22nd(0.1) 21st(0.2)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
68/146
59 | P a g e
Figure 18, WIP growth in front of virtual stations in the unstable network with IA=1.2
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
W I P
Time
Class 2 Class 4
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
69/146
60 | P a g e
Figure 19, WIP growth in front of virtual stations in the stable network with IA=1.2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
W I P
Time
Class 2 Class 4
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
70/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
4.1.3 Simulation Result, uniform distribution inter-arrival time
The simulation result of the Lu-Kumar network is shown in Fig. 20 in which the inter-arrival time
is the uniform distribution and the service time is deterministic. The system is stable when the
uniform distribution of the inter-arrival time is between 0.8 and 0.9. When uniform distribution is
(0.8, 0.9), the probability of falling on two end points is zero. In mathematical form,
(0.8) = 0 & (0.9) = 0 Thus, inter-arrival time will never be 0.9 and the system will not go into unstable state. However,
when the uniform distribution of the inter-arrival time is (0.8, 1.0) or (0.8, 0.905) or even (0.8,
0.9005), the system will finally go into unstable state as there is a probability that the inter-arrival
time becomes 0.9 or more than 0.9. When the inter-arrival time becomes 0.9 or more than 0.9, the
system falls into unstable state and will not come back to the stable state in this case even though
the following inter-arrival time is between 0.8 and 0.9. That leads to the next topic of the
condition in which the Lu-Kumar network will come back to the stable state when the initial
inter-arrival time is 0.9 i.e. there is a small disturbance at initial state of the system.
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
71/146
62 | P a g e
Figure 20, Total queue time of first 300 samples with different uniform distribution arrival time.
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T o t a
l Q t i m e
nth sample
AT= uniform dis (0.8,0.9)
AT=uniform dis (0.8,0.905)
AT=uniform dis (0.8,0.9005)
AT= uniform dis (0.8,0.92)
AT=uniform dis (0.8,1)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
72/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
4.2 Stability, Instability and their relationship
4.2.1 System started single 0.9 inter-arrival time
After inter-arrival time for 1st entity is 0.9, the system will come back to stable state only when
the inter-arrival time of the following entities is more than 1.2 (excluding 1.2). The respective
book keeping of each experiment is discussed in detail as below.
4.2.1.1 Book-keeping for Inter-arrival time = 0.9_0.85_0.85_0.85…
The system with inter-arrival time =0.9_0.85_0.85_0.85… is not stable as the synchronization
between virtual stations happens only 0.6 sec at 11.35 sec from the start. Only this 0.6sec is not
enough for the system to come back to the stable state.
Book-keeping for inter-arrival time =0.9_0.85_0.85_0.85_... is shown in appendix C because of
limited space inside this main report. It is highlighted with blue colour when virtual stations work
simultaneously i.e. synchronization occurs between virtual stations. The book-keeping is shown
only until 50th entity because of limited space of the report.
4.2.1.2 Book-keeping for Inter-arrival time = 0.9_1.10_1.10_1.10…
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
73/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
4.2.1.4 Book-keeping for Inter-arrival time = 0.9_1.50_1.50_1.50…
The book-keeping for inter-arrival time=0.9_1.50_1.50_1.50_... is shown in Table 10. This
system is stable because the inter-arrival time becomes equal to the total service time
(0.2+0.6+0.1+0.6=1.5) of the system. When a particular entity comes into the system, another
entity is about to come out of the system. That helps the system to be balanced and the system
stable even though there is a small disturbance at initial state and synchronization between virtual
machines does not occur at all.
TABLE 10: BOOK-KEEPING FOR INTER-ARRIVAL TIME=0.9_1.50_1.50_1.50_...
Timetime
diffIA Entity m1 (0.2) m2 (0.6) m3 (0.1) m4 (0.6) Out
0 1st 1st (0)
0.2 0.2 1st (0.2) 1st (0)0.8 0.6 1st (0.6) 1st (0)
0.9 0.1 0.9 2nd 2nd (0) 1st (0.1) 1st (0)
1.5 0.6 2nd (0) 1st (0.6) 1st
1.7 0.2 2nd (0.2) 2nd (0)
2.3 0.6 2nd (0.6) 2nd (0)
2.4 0.1 1.5 3rd 3rd(0) 2nd (0.1) 2nd (0)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
74/146
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
75/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
6.8 0.3 6th(0) 5th(0.6) 5th
7 0.2 6th(0.2) 6th(0)7.6 0.6 1.1 6th(0.6) 6th(0)
7.7 0.1 6th(0.1) 6th(0)
7.9 0.2 1.4 7th 7th(0) 6th(0.2)
8.3 0.4 7th(0) 6th(0.6) 6th
8.5 0.2 7th(0.2) 7th(0)
9.1 0.6 7th(0.6) 7th(0)
9.2 0.1 7th(0.1) 7th(0)9.3 0.1 1.4 8th 8th(0) 7th(0.1)
9.8 0.5 8th(0) 7th(0.6) 7th
10 0.2 8th(0.2) 8th(0)
10.6 0.6 8th(0.6) 8th(0)
10.7 0.1 1.4 9th 9th(0) 8th(0.1) 8th(0)
11.3 0.6 9th(0) 8th(0.6) 8th
11.5 0.2 9th(0.2) 9th(0)12.1 0.6 1.4 10th 10th(0) 9th(0.6) 9th(0)
12.2 0.1 10th(0.1) 9th(0.1) 9th(0)
12.3 0.1 10th(0.2) 10th(0) 9th(0)
12.9 0.6 10th(0.6) 10th(0) 9th(0.6) 9th
13 0.1 10th(0.1) 10th(0)
13.5 0.5 1.4 11th 11th(0) 10th(0.5)
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
76/146
-
8/9/2019 Final Report Mean Queue Time Study for the Lu_Kumar Network_Nyan Soe Lynn
77/146
NTU Final Year Project Report on:Mean queue time study for the Lu-Kumar network
30.2 0.6 22nd(0.6) 22nd(0)
30.3 0.1 1.4 23rd 23rd(0) 22nd(0.1) 22nd(0)30.9 0.6 23rd(0) 22nd(0.6) 22nd
31.1 0.2 23rd(0.2) 23rd(0)
31.7 0.6 1.4 24th 24th(0) 23rd(0.6) 23rd(0)
31.8 0.1 24th(0.1) 23rd(0.1) 23rd(0)
31.9 0.1 24t