) ;o. ~ . 3

ORR ANO RENO

c~u.n'- 'cu. J • .....~ . .. "' ·-1.... ~~:= · ~..~. ~ ....~. • <.•· · ~~ iJ - · ~ . . .. ~--~ - ..·. ,, ... , -a-•::"' '"c ••t" ·-c....1C.'"'"' -c.., .g,, "'......H • ....,, ; ..,, ...... • .. a .... r~ •.- ........o-..(;.... ..: ........... •• • o; ... , , J. '"'""'"''"' ~UE• #o "' o••u~ :.,:, .... ,.. Raou•t•• . -~· , ... "' r, v"""" - .. ~ !l~c; ...,. Evc ­ 'J•t•

~~=~~~·:.::­..••o.. i • • , . ... _,<;...

ONE: EAGL.C SQUARE:

P. o . eox 10e CONCORD, IIICW H A M P$H IR[ 03301 •0109

November 11 , 198 5

o ...o. nw , •• Uo''"'"'' l.c,.o

o•.:uuo.•c.

Susan Howard, Esquire Office of the United States' Attorney Dhtrict of New Hampshire 55 Pleasant Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301

Re : United States v. No. CA 65-634-L

Data General Corp., et al.

Dear Ms. Howard:

Enclosed please find Defendant Davidson Rubber Company' s fo1otion to Stay with Concurrence to be filed in the above­captioned case.

::;~;z_·Ttk;; D, Rath

TOR/ djd

Enclos ure

cc : All Counsel of Record Mr . Howard Will iams

\

)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

************* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

Plaintiff Civil Action No. 85-634-L

v.

DATA GENERAL CORPORATION , et al.,

De fend a nt s

············ li

MOTION TO STAY WITH CONCURRENCE

II II NOW COMES the Defendant Davidson Rubber Company, Inc.,

1 by and through its attorneys, and makes the following Motion

li to Stay this matter pending the Court's review and approval

1 of the proposed consent order:

11 1. On October 18, 1985 the United States Department of

j: J ustice fil e d its complaint in this matter naming over 100

r defendants as generators of waste allegedly liable for the

1 r e imbursement of cos ts incurred by the United States for the

~~ investigation, and cleanup of the J< eefe Environmental

j Services site in Epping , New Hampshire,

1 2. All of the named defendant s, including Davidson t• !j Rubber Company, Inc ., have signed a Consent Decree settling

!, the claims ml!lde by the United States in its complaint .

) -2­

3 . The Department of Justice requires that the Consent

Decree be published in the Federal Register and s ubject to a

thirty (30) day public comment period before it may be

approved by the Court.

4. J udicial economy and fairness to the defendants

require that they not be required to file any answers or

other responses to the complaint or discovery r equests

unless the Court rejects the Consent Decree and for thirty

(301 days thereafter.

5 . Attorney Sheila Jones , United State s Department of

11 Justice has stated her concurrence with this motion.

I 11 WHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests that

this Court issue an order staying the filing of all answers ,

I discovery requests , or pleadings responsive to the complaint

· ~~ in thi s until days after receipt of~ · matter thirty (30)

no tice of the Court's rejection o f the proposed Consent

r Decree ,

II II

Respectfully submitted ,

ORR AND RENO, P . A.

I! One Eagle Square P.O. Box 709 Concord , New Hampshire 03301

( 603) 214-2381 ' { j Dated: November 11, 1985 By: (l t. ld l• , '-. -\-...

Thomas D. Ra th

) -3­

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Thomas D. Rath, Esquire, hereby certify that on this 11th day of November, 1985, a copy of the foregoing was sent

by first-class mail, postage prepaid to F. Henry Habicht II, Aseistant Attorney General, Richard V, Wiebusch, United States Attorney, Sheila D. Jones, Esquire, E. Michael · Thomas, Esquire, Robert Brook, Esquire.

I -; I --r-- ~ ( ;· l-

Thomas D. Rath