Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

44
evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

Transcript of Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

Page 1: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

evaluation

aerosol CCI satellite retrievals

MACC assimilations

Reading 2012

Page 2: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

the participants / the task

• AATSR F v142• AATSR O v202/v2q2• AATSR S v040/v031• MERIS A v21• MERIS B v11• MERIS E 802• PARASOL v30

• MODIS_aqua c5.1

• MODIS_terrac5.1

• SEAWIFS• MISR v31• FBOV AOD (MODIS)• FMNG AOD & fine-fr

• evaluate for the year

2008 daily global AOD

and Angstrom data of

– aerosol-CCI retrievals

– MACC assimilations

• compare to

– AERONET / MAN

– MODIS (AOD)

Page 3: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

the scoring concept

• rescale all data to a common 1x1 lat/lon grid

– establish 1x1 gridded AERONET daily data)

• identify local data pairs (satellite/model test

data versus AERONET reference data)

• require 10+ days with 10+ sites (spatial test) or

10+ sites with 10+ temporal records (time test)

to evaluate bias and correlation in any region

• both, a valid spatial score and a valid temporal

score, are required for a valid regional score

Page 4: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

scoring steps

• establish regional scores (1: best, 0: poor)

– step1regional spatial score for each day• (rank) correlation and (rank) bias

– step2regional temporal score for each 1x1 • (rank) correlation and (rank) biast

– step3combined regional score• total score = bias * spat.corr * temp.corr

– step4combine regional to one global score• ‘single score’ from regional total scores

• investigated properties: AOD550, Angstrom

Page 5: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

error / bias evaluation

• explore– total error = (1 - |score, total|)– bias error = (1 - |score, bias|)– spatial error = (1 - score, space)– temporal error = (1 - score, time)

score, total = score, bias * score, space * score, time

– bias•general direction ( + > test-data / - < test-data )•absolute bias (IQ test-data minus IQ reference)

• test vs AERONET: AOD, Angstrom• test vs MODIS, terra: AOD

Page 6: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AOD scores vs AERONET

global land ocean• MODIS A/T .63 .59 .66• AATSR S v40 -.60 .63 -.61• FMNG -.59 -.54 -.62• FBOV .57 .55 .59• AATSR O v202 -.56 -.56 -.58• MISR .53 .58 .53• AATSR F v142 -.52 -.56 -.53• AATSR S v31 -.48 -.56 -.47• MERIS ESA 802 .45 .48• MERIS B v11 .42 .35 .46• SEAWIFS -.41 -.37 -.45• PARASOL .64• MERIS A 21 .49

based on a10+ sample statistics

absolutelarger scoreis better

+/- sign for overall bias

Page 7: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AOD score detail vs AERONET

global land ocean

• FBOV– total score .57 .55 .59– seasonal score .83 .82 .84– bias score .84 .86 .84– spatial score .82 .77 .84

• FMNG– total score -.59 -.54 -.62– seasonal score .82 .81 .84– bias score -.88 -.86 -.91– spatial score .81 .77 .81

10 + events

Page 8: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

Angstrom scores vs AERONET

global land ocean• AATSR S v40 .60 .56 .65• FBOV .56 .55 .55• FMNG .48 -.49 .48• AATSR S v31 .52 .47 .57• AATSR F v142 .47 .51 .47• AATSR O v202 .41 .38 .43• MISR .38 .43 .37• MERIS ESA 802 . 38 .34 .37• PARASOL .44• MERIS A 21 .33

based on a10+ sample statistics

absolutelarger scoreis better

+/- sign for overall bias

Page 9: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

ANG score detail vs AERONET

global land ocean

• FBOV– total score .56 .55 .55– seasonal score .82 .80 .82– bias score .81 .84 .80– spatial score .84 .83 .85

• FMNG– total score .48 -.49 .48– seasonal score .73 .73 .72– bias score .85 -.85 .86– spatial score .77 .79 .77

10 + events

Page 10: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

assimilation data performance

• regional error assessment

– vs AERONET AOD

– vs MODIS-AOD

– vs AERONET Angstrom

Page 11: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

ECMWF AOD

FBOV (single assim.) FMNG (dual assim.)

Page 12: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

FBOV AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 13: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

FMNG AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 14: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

2ass … minus … 1 ass

improvement deteriation

Page 15: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

FBOV AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 16: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

FMNG AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 17: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

2ass … minus … 1 ass

improvement deteriation

Page 18: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

ECMWF Angstrom

FBOV (single assim.) FMNG (dual assim.)

Page 19: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

FBOV ANG performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 20: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

FNMG ANG performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 21: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

2ass … minus … 1 ass

improvement deteriation

Page 22: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

satellite data performance

• regional error assessment

– vs AERONET AOD

– vs MODIS-AOD

Page 23: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

the participants / the task

• AATSR F v142• AATSR O v202/v2q2• AATSR S v040/v031• MERIS A v21• MERIS B v11• MERIS E 802• PARASOL v30

• MODIS_aqua c5.1

• MODIS_terrac5.1

• SEAWIFS• MISR v31

• evaluate daily global

‘CCI-aerosol’ retrievals

– for the entire year 2008• AOD 550nm• Angstrom (if offered)

• versus AERONET / MAN

• performance in context

of established retrievals

Page 24: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

data content AOD year 2008

MISR

MODIS TERRA

PARASOL

MERIS-ESA

MERIS-BAER

MERIS-ALAMO

ATSR-SU

ATSR ORAC

ATSR ADV

Page 25: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

data volume AOD 1/1/2008

MODIS AQUA

MISR

PARASOL

MERIS-ESA

MERIS-BAER

MERIS-ALAMO

ATSR-SU

ATSR ORAC

ATSR ADV

MODIS TERRA

Page 26: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MODIS TERRA AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– albsolute

Page 27: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MODIS AQUA AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 28: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MISR AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 29: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

POLDER AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 30: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MERIS ESA AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 31: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MERIS BEAR AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 32: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MERIS ALAMO AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 33: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AATSR SU40 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 34: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AATSR SU31 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 35: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AATSR O202 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 36: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AATSR O202iq AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

effectively ‘identical to O202

Page 37: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AATSR ADV142 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 38: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AATSR SU40 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

MODIS terra

Page 39: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AATSR O202 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

MODIS terra

Page 40: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

AATSR ADV142 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

MODIS terra

Page 41: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

POLDER AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 42: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MERIS ESA AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 43: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MERIS BEAR AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 44: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012.

MERIS ALAMO AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute