ESPON Workshop at the Open Days Brussels, 6 October 2010 ESPON provides regions with targeted...
Transcript of ESPON Workshop at the Open Days Brussels, 6 October 2010 ESPON provides regions with targeted...
ESPON Workshop at the Open DaysBrussels, 6 October 2010
ESPON provides regions with targeted analysis
Success for Convergence Region’s EconomiesVictoria Primhak, L.U.P.T. - University of Naples
Federico II
Research TeamLead Partner: L.U.P.T. University of Naples Federico IICoordinator: Prof. Guglielmo TrupianoTeam: Dr Enrica Rapolla, Dr Ettore Guerrera, Dr Filomena Izzo, Dr Victoria Primhak
Partner: Dept.of Environmental Sciences, Geography/ Urban andRegional Studies, University of BaselCoordinator: Prof. Dr. Rita Schneider-SliwaTeam: Dr Tina Haisch, Prof. Urs Muller, Esther Gloor
Subcontractors and local experts: BAK Basel Economics, EurofundProject Consulting S.L., Nodi srl, Stowarzyszenie Miasta w Internecie,Georgia Karavangeli, Vasilis Lepidas, Lukas Nikitin
StakeholdersCampania (Italy)Podlasie (Poland)East Macedonia – Thrace (Greece)Valencia (Spain)
Umbrella Organisations:Conference of Peripheral Maritime RegionsAssembly of European Regions Assembly of European Border Regions
Advisory status:Ministry of Economic DevelopmentItaly
General Goals
•To understand why some convergence regions continue to lag behind and others are able to accelerate their growth rates and catch up with the EU mean
•To identify factors that affect above average and below average growth rates relating to effective fund management and effective public administration
•To identify effective strategies regional policy-makers can adopt in lagging regions to improve economic performance and make the most of cohesion policy
• To draw up policy suggestions for the 4 stakeholder Regions
Research approach
Key Findings
• Preconditions for Economic success• Efficiency of the public workforce• Efficient decision-making for fund allocation and implementation
procedures • Effective monitoring and evaluation systems• Transparency and accountability of processes, including low levels
of corruption and a stable regulatory framework• Economic drivers
• Exploiting knowledge and innovation potentials, eg university quality• Enhancing accessibility & connectivity• Improving the quality of life including heritage, social conditions• Exploiting/modernising the economic settings and structure • EU funds amount and allocation
• Economic enablers• Taxation• Regulation• Administration system and governance
Key findings – stakeholder regions…from the regional survey: questionnaires
Weak convergence regions Catching-up region
Factors Median Mean Factors Median Mean
1. EU funds allocation 9 8.94 1. Quality of life 8 7.99
2. Connectivity 9 8.49 2. Accessibility 8 7.83
3. Innovation potentials 9 8.43 3. Population/social 8 7.82
4. Accessibility 9 8.39 4. EU funds amounts 8 7.80
5. Governance/admin 9 8.23 5. Regulation 8 7.80
6. Quality of life 9 8.18 6. EU funds allocation 8 7.70
7. EU funds amounts 9 8.08 7. Innovation potentials 8 7.69
8. Economic settings 8 7.92 7. Governance/admin 8 7.69
9. Taxation 8 7.60 9. Economic settings 8 7.66
10. Decentralisation 8 7.47 10. Decentralisation 8 7.63
11. Regulation 7 6.80 11. Taxation 8 7.54
12. Population/social 7 6.67 12. Connectivity 7 7.42
Weak and catching up convergence regions differ in regard to success factors!
Lessons Learned• Convergence regions can take full advantage of cohesion policy
only if the economic preconditions are met.• The effectiveness and efficiency of EU funds allocation and
spending in convergence regions is more important than the amount available
• Differences in the exploitation of resources or economic drivers in convergence regions explain successful economic performance
• Exploiting innovation potentials should be a policy focus, but must be geared to regional contexts and strengths
• EU funds add to economic growth in the absence of corruption and high accountability in convergence regions
• Other relevant factors include quality of human capital and decentralisation
Policy suggestions
•Foster cooperation up-stream and improve coordination down- stream for the implementation of cohesion• Public accountability and the transparency of processes• Avoid concentration on a single sector but ensure diversification
is complementary to regional potentials• Invest in major transport and infrastructure projects • Invest in available human capital
Campania: improvement of public administration efficiency and coordination of funds in key areas
Podlasie: improvements in the economic structure REMTH: modernising public administration to better utilize regional
potentialsValencia : innovation, natural and cultural heritage
.