Erik.Ranheim@INTERTANKO Manager Research and Projects, INTERTANKO
-
Upload
noah-velasquez -
Category
Documents
-
view
315 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Erik.Ranheim@INTERTANKO Manager Research and Projects, INTERTANKO
Tanker performance Instituto Iberoamericano de Derecho Maritimo
XII Congress/XX AnniversarySeville 14 November 2007
Manager Research and Projects, INTERTANKO
International Association of Independent Tanker OwnersA non-governmental organization established in Oslo
in 1970 to represent tanker owners Membership:280 members40+ countries
2,800+ tankers226 million dwt
75% of independent tanker fleet300 Associate Members
Oslo – London - Singapore – Washington
Spokesman – information service – meeting place
INTERTANKO
MISSION “Provide leadership to the Tanker
Industry in serving the world with safe, environmentally sound and efficient
seaborne transportation of oil, gas and chemical products.”
VISION for the TANKER INDUSTRY“A responsible, sustainable and
respected Tanker Industry, committed to continuous improvement and
constructively influencing its future.”
2. INTERTANKO
Tanker challenges
Carrying the world’s most strategic raw material from some of the most politically tense areas in the world
Carrying liquids and gases that pollute and are potentially hazardous
Operating in a very volatile and uncertain market.
Introduction to the tanker industry
Seaborne Crude Oil Trade Flows 2006
Seaborne oil trade and Middle East oil production
mbd
Source: Fearnleys/IEA
'000
bil tm
0
5
10
15
20
25
1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 19972000200320060
2,600
5,200
7,800
10,400
13,000
Tonne miles
Middle East Oil Production - mbd
VLCC spot and break-even rates
$ per day freight rate
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
1989 19901991 1992 19931994 19951996 1997 19981999 2000 20012002 2003 20042005 20062007
Current VLCC price in any year, interest rate average LIBOR for period + 1.25% (7.1%) , docking costs $1-4 m per 5 year period, residual value $6m after 25 years. Based on NPV calculations
Break-even rates
Freight rates
Tanker shipping cost efficientOil prices and tanker rates – real and nominal
$/barrel
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90Nominell pris Arab Light
Reell pris Arab Light
Nominell frakt rate AG-Vest
Reell frakt rate AG-Vest
Tanker shipping cost efficientUS CIF oil price/freight costs -
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1973 1988 1992 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Freight costs Persian Gulf - US
Oil price FOB
$/barrel
43% 5% 6% 7% 6% 5% 4%
Tanker shipping cost efficientGasoline price at the pump
Euro per litre
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
USA Japan Spain Germany UK
Long haulfreight rates
Marketing
Oil price
Tax
Cost elements making up the gasoline price:
Based on Sept. 2007 figures from IEA and the Baltic Exchange
Tanker ownership
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2000 2007
State Oil
Oil
Independ.
State
China239 m dwt
286 m dwt
m dwt
Current value fleet :~ $200 bnFreight income 2006:~ $45 bn
Tanker contracting by segment
Source: Clarkson Shipyard MonitorSource: Clarkson Shipyard Monitor
m USD m dwt
0
11
22
33
44
5519
85
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
9m07
0
17
34
51
68
85
Handy
Aframaxes
Suezmaxes
VLCCs
m dwt
Source: Clarkson Shipyard Monitor
m dwt
Tanker fleet, orderbook and phase outtankers above 25,000 dwt
m dwtm dwt
84 m dwt 138 m dwt
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
SH - 25% Orders - 41% Fleet - 100%
VLCC
Suezmax
Aframax
Panamax
Handy
34%
65%
40%
339 m dwt
Tanker phase out, deliveries, scrapping tankers >25,000 dwt, assume 2.5% trade growth
m dwtm dwt
-35
-25
-15
-5
5
15
25
35
45
55
-02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Newbuilding tobalance
Max phase out
Deletions
Delveries
Surplustonnage
year
Removals in addition to phase out
SH VLCC trading after 2010
Tanker fleet by hull
%%
* Assumes phase out according to regulations and trading until the age of 25 * Assumes phase out according to regulations and trading until the age of 25 years after 2010 except that 10 SH aframaxes/VLCCs/suezmaxes are years after 2010 except that 10 SH aframaxes/VLCCs/suezmaxes are assumed to be removed in addition to phase out 2008-2010 (conversions).assumed to be removed in addition to phase out 2008-2010 (conversions).
622
5159
67 68 73 77 82 88 9494
78
4941 33 32 27 23 18 12 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
1991
1997
End
02
End
03
End
04
End
05
End
06
End
07
End
08
End
09
End
10
SH/DB/DS
DH
% dwt share*:
Source: IEA
World oil demand increase - mbd
mbd
Increase 2008 Rest of world:Other Asia: 0.19 mbdLatin America: 0.16 mbd Africa: 0.11 mbdEurope: 0.21 mbdOthers 0.4 0mbdTotal 1.94 mbd
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
2.8
3.2
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
** Rest of world
*Middle East
USA
China
95% 7% 50% 35% 19% 19% 55% 39% 22%
Tanker safety and the environment
Tanker trade and accidental oil spills99.99998% of the cargo arrives safely
0
400
800
1,200
1,600
1971-76 1977-82 1983-88 1989-94 1995-00 2001-06
0
17,000
34,000
51,000
68,000
Accidental pollution
Tonne-miles
Source: ITOPF spills, Fearnleys: Tonne miles
+97% -52 % +50 %
-26%-80%
Percentages refers to changes compared to previous year
10001000ts spiltts spilt
bn bn tonne-mtonne-m
Amoco Cadiz 78 – 223 4Amoco Cadiz 78 – 223 4Independenta 79 - 95Independenta 79 - 95Atlantic Empress 79 – 287Atlantic Empress 79 – 287 1 1
Exxon Valdez 89 – 37Exxon Valdez 89 – 37Haven 91 - 144Haven 91 - 144ABT Summer 91 – 260 2ABT Summer 91 – 260 2
Tanker incidents – all sizes all types
0
220
440
660
880
110078 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
0
140
280
420
560
700War
Hull & Machinery
Fire/Expl
Grounded
Coll/Contact
Misc.
Pollution - bars
2007 is a projection based on 10 ms
No incidents ‘000 ts oil spills
Tanker incidents by cause 1978-1Q07
Number incidents
Source: Based on incident reports from Lloyd’s Maritime Information Service
Oil pollution – 1000 ts
31%
10%
20%
27%
12%0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Hull & MachineryFire/ExplGrounded Coll/ContactMisc.Largest pollutionPollution - bars
Erik
aE
rika
Bal
tic C
arrie
rB
altic
Car
rier
Pre
stig
eP
rest
ige
Tas
man
Spi
ritT
asm
an S
pirit
Al S
amid
oon
Al S
amid
oon
DB
L 15
2 D
BL
152
Brig
ht A
rtem
is
Brig
ht A
rtem
is
Tanker incidents by cause 2006
Source: Based on incident reports from Informa
13%28%
9%
33%17%
Collision
Grounding
Fire/Explosion
Hull & machinery
Misc/unknown
Collision
Groundings
Hull & Machinery (32 engine, 3 hull related)
Misc.
F & E
Reported tanker incidents Jan-Dec 2006 -
total 265
Total losses, tankers and bulkers
Source: Clarkson
Number
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Tankers 47
Bulkers 155
Trends – Co2 emission, energy use, global trade
Source: Fearnleys/INTERTANKO
IndexIndex
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Population
Energy use
CO2 emission
Seaborne trade
World CO2 emission
Shipping 2%
Other transportation
Eelectricity/heat
Industry +
Industrial processes
Land use change
Agriculture
WasteSource; World Resource Institute
Shipping and the environment
Fuelled by the dirtiest part of the barrelresulting in emissions of:• SOx• NOx• un-combusted hydrocarbon• Heavy metals• Soot
Reducing harmful emissions from ships
• Onboard abatement technology– Scrubbers, filters, separators, catalysts
• SECAs/NECAs– Sulphur/Nitrogen Emission Control Areas
• Type and quality of fuel – Heavy fuel oil = a blending of refinery residues and
distillate (up to 30% dist.)– Distillates = gasoil and diesel
Parties in the current regulatory and governance structures
Paris MoUParis MoU
1x2x3
Regulatory changes
Accidents
Political interference
Bureaucracy-driven-drivenSelf-regulation
Unlikely Mistrust of shipping
Ideal regulatory/governance system
• Global, simple, clear regulations created by competent people based on knowledge and analysis
• Strong, effective, regular controls by responsible bodies• Port State - Control of last resort?• Centralised comprehensive accident registration,
investigation and analysis• Transparency – obligation to report incidents
Tankers perform
Tankers serve the major oil companies, which today are some of the most difficult clients in the world to satisfy, and tanker owners are under a great deal of pressure from the authorities.
Zero tolerance for oil spills