Er. Alekhya Datta Fellow & Area Convenor, Electricity...
Transcript of Er. Alekhya Datta Fellow & Area Convenor, Electricity...
“A QIP Course on Smart Grid Technology”
PBCEC Seminar Hall, Visitors’ Hostel, IIT Kanpur
Er. Alekhya Datta
Fellow & Area Convenor, Electricity & Fuels Division
‘Role of Energy Storage in Smart Grid – BESS a game-changer for DISCOMs’
10th May, 2019 (Friday) www.teriin.org
2
Capacity addition of 40 GW of GC Solar Rooftop by 2022.
Target oriented approach to deploy low-emission vehicles by 2030 (PMO desired 25% to be converted into Electric & FAME-II)
National EV Charging Infrastructure Policy: De-licensing setting up EV charging Stations, Mandatory Provision in City Master Plan Regulations.
National Tariff Policy, (Draft Amendments) proposed 24 hours supply of adequate and un-interrupted power to all categories of consumers by March, 2019.
Also, penalty on the Discoms in-case of power cuts other than in force majeure conditions or, technical faults.
Narrow frequency band. Also, provision of sign change every six time blocks
Aggressive National RE Target National Solar Rooftop & EVs Target Draft Amendments in ‘National Tariff Policy 2016’ & Deviation Settlement (DSM) Amendments
Changing Demand Profile with increasing Peak-Demand .
Increasing Penetration of Solar & EVs at Distribution Downstream
Context – Transition in Indian Electricity Sector
2022: 175 GW
2027: 275 GW(as per NEP)
2030: 350-400 GW(as per ETC India, TERI)
“Adverse technical impacts on DSO, over-loading T&D equipment, T&D system up-gradation & RE integration cost, and low PLFs of TPPs”
Critical Issues at Distribution-level & Possible Solutions
Skewed demand pattern
High AT&C losses
Overloading of distribution infrastructure during specific months/ durations
Deviation settlement charges
RPO targets and RE integration
Farthest-end voltage drop due to long length of feeders
Obligation to deliver reliable power supply
Right of way issues
3
Flexible loads: DSM (DR, TOD and EE)
Increased regional co-ordination and build more transmission and distribution capacity
Renewable source diversity
Flexible generations: Peaking power plants such as gas power and pumped hydro storage plants
Curtailment of RE
Augmentation of distribution equipment
Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)
Possible Solutions
Problems at Distribution-level
Major Battery Technologies
4
Advanced Lead Acid/ Ultra Battery
Sodium based Battery – NAS
Li-Ion Battery Technology
Flow Battery Technology
Performance measure
CycleLife
Energy Efficiency (%)
Market leader
1,200 80
Best in class 2,000 85
Performance measure
CycleLife
Energy Efficiency (%)
Market leader
4,000 70
Best in class 6,000 85
Performance measure
CycleLife
Energy Efficiency (%)
Market leader
2,000 90
Best in class 10,000+
95
Performance measure
CycleLife
Energy Efficiency (%)
Market leader 5,000 60
Best in class 10,000+ 70
Technology Selection & Applications Mapping
5
BESS Technology Selection Metrics
Capital cost ($/kWh) Cycle life Roundtrip Energy Efficiency Space footprint C-rate (duration) Usable SOC range Balance of plant and power
electronics cost ($/kW) Ambient operating temperature and
auxiliary requirements
Segments /
ApplicationsSub Segments Power Rating
Duration
(in Hour)DOD
Type of
cycles
No of
cycles /
Year
Load shifting or energy
arbitrage
DTR-Level 10 kW - 150 kW 2-4 h >80% Mix <400
Feeder/ Grid-level 500 kW - 5 MW 2-4 h >80% Mix <400
Off-grid applications
Rural Microgrid
(households) 1 kW - 5 kW 2-8 h >80% Mix <400
Rural Schools/
Hospitals 1 kW - 10 kW 2-8 h >80% Mix <400
Replacement of DG
Telecom Towers 2 kW - 5 kW 2-4 h >80% Mix <700
Commercial 10 kW - 2 MW 2-4 h >80% Mix <400
Industrial 500 kW - 5 MW 2-4 h >80% Mix <400
Transmission or
Distribution DeferralUtilities
1-20 MW 4-6 h >80% Mix <100
Frequency support Utilities/ IPP1 MW- 20 MW
15 min –
1 h <60% Shallow <18,000
Reactive Power
ManagementUtility/ C&I 3 kW - 10 MW
15 min –
1 hN.A. N.A. N.A.
Less response time
Modularity in size
Flexibility in transportation
Options of multiple Chemistries
Global Scenario
6
Falling Battery PricesCoal & Gas vs.
Solar+BESS
Energy Storage
Deployments by Segment
Source: GTM Research/ ESA U.S.
Energy Storage Monitor
Global BESS vs. Chinese
BESS Installation
Source: CNESA
Source: TERI’s Analysis
Global Case Studies at Distribution-level
7
Sr. No. Location Problem Statement Solution System Size Applications in General Results
1. Leighton Buzzard
Substation, Bedfordshire,
United Kingdom.
Distribution company:
UKPN
Leighton Buzzard primary substation design
includes a 33/11 kV substation and two 33kV
circuits, each with a rated thermal capacity of 35.4
MVA. Due to Higher Heating load in the winter,
UKPN experiences its peak demand in the winter
such that the local peak demand surpasses the
rated 35.4 MVA capacity limit of each feeder. The
peak demand at Leighton Buzzard has been
observed to be exceeding rated thermal capacity of
one of the 33 kVA circuit between 9 and 37 days for
the past few years
To avoid distribution Infrastructure upgrade by
building 33 kV circuit and a 38 MVA transformer
located near Leighton buzzard substation.Utility
opted for installing BESS to defer the costly
Infrastructure Upgrade of 6.2 Million Pounds.
6 MW/ 10 MWh with
Lithium ion Manganese
Battery cells.
Distribution Upgrade Deferral,
Peak Load Management, Reliable
Power Supply
BESS provides 7.5 MVA capacity with
an expected life of 10-14 years which
can cater the Peak Load which is
shorter in duration in the current
scenario.
2. Browns Valley, California,
United States
Distribution Company:
Pacific Gas & Electricity
(PG&E)
California experiences heat waves over June and
mid-July which drives peak loading due to cooling
demand at the Browns Valley substation
transformer above its normal rating threshold of
2.4 MW
A. The utility identified deploying BESS at
substation site as the ideal solution. PG&E
developed a list of criteria’s to ensure appropriate
selection of battery size and location.
B. PG&E accordingly selected Browns valley
substation due to overload projected in the
upcoming years, PG&E had also its own land
availability adjacent to the substation, Residential
driven profile of short duration and availability of
SCADA already in place to integrate the BESS.
500 kW/2 MWh with
Lithium-ion Battery
Technology.
Peak Load Management, Stable
Power Supply, Participation in
CAISO market for Ancillary
services.
With the help of RTEDCs (Real-Time
Distributed Energy Control System),
BESS showed ability to shave the
estimated peak demand over the
years BESS being deployed.
Also with the advanced controls,
Frequency related signals were
successfully received to enhance
power supply in the grid.
3. Brooklyn Queens Demand
Management Program
Distribution Company:
Consolidated Edison
The Brooklyn Queens area possess overload
condition of the electric sub-transmission feeders
serving the Brownsville No. 1 and 2 sub-stations
and had a 17 MW of overload at Utility side and
overload due to Energy Inefficient methods at
customer side leading to overload of 52 MW.
To meet the growing demand, ConEd had to
upgrade its Substation in Brooklyn and Queens that
would cost the utility and ratepayers an estimated
$1 billion USD.
ConEd addressed the problem by a 2 way approach.
BESS at utility level: by using Battery Energy
Storage System (BESS) at distribution level.
Demand side management: Through consumer side
solutions like Demand Response, Energy Efficiency,
and other Retrofitting Programs targeting demand
reduction.
1 MW / 3.4 MWh with
Lithium ion Battery
Technology.
Distribution Upgrade Deferral,
Frequency Regulation, Spinning
& Non Spinning reserve,
Resource Adequacy.
Integration of BESS avoided $1
billion investment in the distribution
upgrade and with combination of
approach like Energy storage,
Demand Response and Energy
Efficiency measures.
In upcoming years ConEd estimates
60% more revenues with
participation in NYISO day ahead
market and ancillary services market.
[1] https://www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/1710-Text.pdf[2] https://www.pge.com/pge_global/common/pdfs/about-pge/environment/what-we-are-doing/electric-program-investment-charge/PGE-EPIC-Project-1.02.pdf[3] https://rmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/RMI-TheEconomicsOfBatteryEnergyStorage-FullReport-FINAL.pd
National- level Development (till date)
8
CERC Staff Paper on ESS in Jan, 2017
CEA, Technical study report for optimum location of balancing energy sources/energy storage devices in Dec, 2017
CERC Deviation Settlement Mechanism, 4th
Amendment in Nov, 2018
BESS Pilot Project, Puducherry in 2017-2018
BIS Energy Storage Systems Sectional Committee, ETD-52
Tata Power and AES BESS grid-scale pilot
in 2019
Case Study on PGCIL (BESS at Puducherry)
9
Size of the Pilot Project Technical Specifications
Single Line Diagram Findings
Sr. No. Technology Capacity
Package IAdvanced Lead
Acid500 kW-30 Min (250 kWh)
Package II Lithium ion 500 kW-30 Min (250 kWh)
Package III Flow 250 kW-4 hours (1,000 kWh)
Parameters Li-ion Battery Advanced lead
Acid Battery
Flow Battery
Charging rate 3 hrs. from rated DoD
to Full Capacity
3 hrs. from rated
DoD to full capacity
5 hrs. from rated DoD
to full capacity
DC-DC Round-trip
efficiency
>90% >80% >75%
Service Life 10 years 10 years 10 years
Life-cycle 4,000 cycles (900
MWh)
3,000 cycles (675
MWh)
3,000 cycles (2,700
MWh)
Parameter Advanced Lead Acid Lithium Ion
Delivered Size 250 kWh, 500 kW 250 kWh, 500 kW
Design Sizing 691.2 kWh 398 kWh
Nos. of Cells 600 nos. 1728 nos.
Rated DoD 65% 70%
Battery Footprint One 40 ft. and one 20 ft. Container
Area Foot print: 45 sq. m.
One 40 ft. Container
Area foot-print: 30 sq. m.
Cost - 1.5 times than Advanced
Lead Acid
Case Study on AES – Tata Power DDL Pilot
5/12/201910
Size of the Pilot Project Applications
Findings
Technology Capacity
Lithium-Ion
(NMC)10 MW (1 hour)
Application Revenue Streams Envisaged
Frequency Response Need developed ancillary markets
Reducing Deviation Settlement
Charges
Savings in terms of deviation
settlement charges
Reliability Improvement Yet to be quantified
Flattening the load curve Savings in peak power purchase
Inverter (from Parker)
UPS
Node Controller (from Fluence)
Master BMS (from Fluence)
Battery Modules & BMS (from LG Chemical)
Applications of BESS at Distribution Downstream
11
Distribution Transformer
Level
Feeder Level
Sub-Station Level
Over-load Management
at DTR/ Feeder/ Sub-station Level
Augmentation deferral of
Distribution Transformer
Up-grade augmentation
deferral
Defer augmentation
of Power Transformer
Improving PV Hosting
Capacity
Reduction in Peak Power
Purchase
Farthest End Voltage
Improvement
Loss Reduction
Support EV Charging
Application may vary depending on actual loading situations and pain areas
in Distribution Network
Localized voltage control
TERI’s Experience in BESS with Discoms*
12
BRPL (Pvt./
JV)CESC (Pvt.)
WBSEDCL (State-
Owned)
Placement
Applications
Shortlisted
Locations
Cat A- Distribution/ LT feeders having substantial penetration of Solar PV systems
Cat B- Group housing society/ gated res. community having rooftop Solar PV systems
Cat C- Research Institutions (under HT category, having existing Solar Rooftop PV system & EVs)
Cat A- Overloaded Distribution Transformers (DTRs) in areas with no space to install another DTR
Cat B- Substation with solar rooftop PV system
Cat C- Consumers with critical loads Cat D- Grid-scale battery storage
Cat A- Overloaded Distribution Transformers (DTRs) in areas with no space to install another DTR
Cat B- Lengthy and overloaded 11 kV feeders
Cat C- Seasonally overloaded feeders (with agri loads)
Cat D- Distributed storage for better integration of large-scale distributed solar
Cat A- DTR overload management, augmentation deferral
Cat B- Power back-up for common loads, energy arbitrage and overload management
Cat C- Energy arbitrage and solar intermittency management
Cat A- DT overload management and augmentation deferral
Cat B- Managing solar intermittency and power back-up
Cat C- Power back-up for critical loads Cat D- Savings on peak power purchase and
reducing UI charges, DSM Rules, Capex deferral on PTRs
Cat A- DTR overload management,augmentation deferral and localized voltage control
Cat B- Feeder overload management & augmentation deferral, and energy arbitrage
Cat C- Feeder overload management, solar and BESS integrated solutions
Cat D- Solar Farming, Overall Peak Reduction
Cat A- Taimur Nagar 11 kV feeder having two 990 kVA DTRs
Cat B- Yet to be shortlisted Cat C- TERI School of Advanced Studies
(SAS) having 50 kWp rooftop solar PV system with ToD pricing applicable
Cat A- Ashok Nagar - 315 kVA DTR Cat B- New Cossipore 33/11 kV Sub-Station
with 50 kWp of solar rooftop PV system Cat C- Saroj Gupta Cancer Research Institute. Cat D- 132/66 kV Sub-station at Taratala,
Majerhat
Cat A- Hatiara Uttarmath 315 kVA DTR & others
Cat B- 11 kV Kharibari feeder & others Cat C- Yet to be shortlisted Cat D- Solar Power projects at Teesta Canal
Fall (TCF) Hydel Power Stations
*Work done/ on-going till date
R&D in BESS at TERI
Technical Studies
BESS Sizing
Control-logic Algorithm
R&D Lab
Techno-economic Web Tool
Grid-integration studies for BESS as enabler of rooftop PV and EVs
Load Flow Analysis for BESS voltage-improvement applications
Harmonics & Power Quality Studies
VPP studies using distributed storage
Dynamic control logic for DTR overload management
Real-time parameter monitoring
Variable C-rate for BESS
Charging and discharging trigger based on Shaving level and parameters
Programmable and robust control logic
Pre-field performance validation of distribution-level BESS
Battery simulator to emulate different chemistries
RTDS based testing of BESS control logic
Application specific BESS sizing
LCOS calculations LCOS projections
Two-stage optimization approach for DTR overload management and solar intermittency management
Based on detailed analysis of load-curve
Envisaged change in demand pattern considered
Technical characteristics of Batteries considered
13