ENZYME CO-LOADING INTO POLYMERIC PARTICLES AND...
-
Upload
nguyentuyen -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of ENZYME CO-LOADING INTO POLYMERIC PARTICLES AND...
ENZYME CO-LOADING INTO
POLYMERIC PARTICLES AND
CAPSULES
Aantal woorden: 15.900
Kenneth Asselman Stamnummer: 00903978
Promotor: Prof. dr. Andre Skirtach
Supervisor: Dr. Bogdan Parakhonskiy
Masterproef voorgelegd voor het behalen van de graad master in de richting Master of Science in de
industriële wetenschappen: biochemie
Academiejaar: 2016 – 2017
ENZYME CO-LOADING INTO
POLYMERIC PARTICLES AND
CAPSULES
Aantal woorden: 15.900
Kenneth Asselman Stamnummer: 00903978
Promotor: Prof. dr. Andre Skirtach
Tutor: Dr. Bogdan Parakhonskiy
Masterproef voorgelegd voor het behalen van de graad master in de richting Master of Science in de
industriële wetenschappen: biochemie
Academiejaar: 2016 – 2017
4
“The author and the promoter give the permission to use this thesis for consultation and to copy parts of it for personal use. Every other use is subject to the copyright laws, more
specifically the source must be extensively specified when using the results from this thesis”.
Promotor: Prof. dr. André Skirtach
Tutor: Dr. Bogdan Parakhonskiy
Author: Kenneth Asselman
Ghent University 20 January 2017
5
Foreword
I would like to thank my promotor Prof. dr. Andre Skirtach to give me the opportunity to work
on this thesis. Further I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Bogdan Parakhonskiy and
Dr. Timothy Douglas for their help and advice.
Further I would like to thank my parents and friends for their constant support.
6
Abstract In this study, new calcium/magnesium particles were designed and their characteristics (size
shape and crystallinity) were studied. Next, Gellan gum hydrogels were prepared with the
newly synthesized particles with the objective to create hydrogel-particle composites as
novel drug delivery system. The hydrogel properties (gelation time and gel stiffness) were
investigated. First, calcium/magnesium carbonate particles are synthesized by varying
Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio and reaction conditions (time and addition of organic solvent). This was done
to investigate the influence of reaction conditions on the size, shape and crystallinity of the
particles. These tests showed that different types particles are created varying the reaction
conditions: spherical, elliptical, paired, star-like and amorphous particles. The size decreases
three time if an organic solvent is added and if the reaction time increases from minutes to
hours. All samples contain vaterite and/or calcite with an increasing amorphous phase if
Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio decreases. Hydromagnesite is only present in samples containing at least
50% magnesium in micro-particles and in nano-particles with 33,3% magnesium. Next,
gelation time of hydrogels prepared with the newly designed particles decreases if particle
concentration increases or if the Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio decreases. Whereas particles with a 0%
magnesium could not induce gelation and those with 33,3% magnesium need to contain
minimum 20% particles for comparable gelation time as those with a higher magnesium
content but with 4% particles. Also gel stiffness was studied, this increased if the particle
concentration increased or the Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio decreased. With these results, spherical
micro-particles (Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio of 3:1) are more suitable since they have an appropriate
gelation time, high particle concentration to prepare hydrogels as drug delivery system.
Keywords: carbonate particles, hydrogel, Gellan gum, drug delivery system
7
Samenvatting In deze studie werden nieuwe calcium/magnesium deeltjes gecreëerd en werden hun
eigenschappen (grootte, vorm en kristalliniteit) bestudeerd. Daarna werden Gellan gum
hydrogels gesynthetiseerd met de nieuwe deeltjes met als doel om nieuwe drug delivery
systemen te creëren. De eigenschappen (stijfheid en snelheid van gelvorming) van de
gevormde hydrogels werden onderzocht. Eerst werden de verschillende deeltjes
gesynthetiseerd door de reactie omstandigheden (tijd en toevoegen van organisch solvent)
en de Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio te veranderen. Door deze parameters te veranderen kon de invloed
van deze op de grootte, vorm en kristalliniteit van de deeltjes bestudeerd worden. Hieruit
blijkt dat verschillende deeltjes kunnen gecreëerd worden: sferische, elliptische, gepaarde,
ster-vormende en amorfe deeltjes. De grootte van de deeltjes daalt ongeveer drie maal als er
een organisch solvent wordt toegevoegd en als de reactie tijd stijgt van minuten naar uren.
Verder werd er in alle stalen vateriet en/of calciet teruggevonden waarbij de amorfe fase
toeneemt als de Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio daalt. Hydromagnesiet is enkel aanwezig bij deeltjes
gesynthetiseerd met een met een magnesiumgehalte van 50% of hoger bij microdeeltjes en
bij nanodeeltjes met een magnesiumgehalte van 33,3%. Daarna bleek dat de snelheid van
gelvorming daalt als de Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio stijgt, deeltjes die geen magnesium bevatten, kunnen
geen gelvorming induceren. Ook de stijfheid van de gels werd bepaald, de stijfheid van
hydrogels neemt toe als de concentratie van de deeltjes toeneemt of als de Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio
daalt. Uit alle resultaten kan besloten worden dat sferische microdeeltjes met een met een
magnesiumgehalte van 33,3% de voorkeur genieten om hydrogels te synthetiseren. De
reactie omstandigheden zijn beter dan die voor nano-deeltjes en er is een hogere
concentratie mogelijk zonder de gelvorming drastisch te verhogen.
Kernwoorden: drug delivery system, carbonaat deeltjes, Gellan gum, hydrogel
8
Index
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 13
2 Literature ....................................................................................................................................... 15
2.1 Drug delivery ............................................................................................................................. 15
2.2 Hydrogel .................................................................................................................................... 16
2.3 Gellan gum................................................................................................................................. 18
2.4 Ceramic biomaterials ................................................................................................................. 20
2.4.1 Ceramic Particles ................................................................................................................... 21
2.4.2 CaCO3 Particles ...................................................................................................................... 22
2.4.3 MgCO3 Particles ..................................................................................................................... 25
2.5 Particles for gelation.................................................................................................................. 27
3 Goals .............................................................................................................................................. 28
3.1 Characterization of micro- and nanoparticles ........................................................................... 28
3.2 Identification of hydrogel properties ........................................................................................ 28
4 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................................. 29
4.1 Materials .................................................................................................................................... 29
4.2 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 29
4.2.1 Synthesis of the particles....................................................................................................... 29
4.2.2 Characterization of the particles ........................................................................................... 30
4.2.3 Synthesis of Gellan gum ........................................................................................................ 30
4.2.4 Preparation of the hydrogels ................................................................................................ 30
4.2.5 Investigation of the hydrogel properties ............................................................................... 31
5 Results and Discussion .................................................................................................................. 32
5.1 Characterization of the particles ............................................................................................... 33
5.1.1 Yield of the Particles .............................................................................................................. 33
5.1.2 SEM Images ........................................................................................................................... 35
5.1.3 XRD Data ................................................................................................................................ 38
5.1.4 FTIR Data ............................................................................................................................... 40
5.2 Investigation of gel properties .................................................................................................. 43
5.2.1 Gelation time ......................................................................................................................... 43
5.2.2 Rheometry results ................................................................................................................. 45
5.2.3 FTIR Data ............................................................................................................................... 47
6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 49
References ............................................................................................................................................. 51
Attachments .......................................................................................................................................... 56
9
Attachment 1: Statistics of yield............................................................................................................ 56
Attachment 2: SEM Images ................................................................................................................... 60
Attachment 3: Gel formation ................................................................................................................ 70
Attachment 4: Rheometry Data ............................................................................................................ 71
10
Abbreviations CaP calcium phosphates
CD cyclodextrin
EG ethylene glycol
GDL D-glucono-δ-lactone
GG Gellan gum
HA hydroxyapatite
HAA hyaluronic acid
HEMA hydroxyethyl methacrylate
PAAc poly(acrylic acid)
PAAm polyacrylamide
PAN polyacrylonitrile
PBO poly(butylene oxide)
PCL polycaprolactone
PEG poly (ethylene glycol)
PEMA poly(ethyl methacrylate)
PEO poly(ethylene oxide)
PF propylene fumarate
PGEMA poly(glucosylethyl methacrylate)
PHB poly(hydroxy butyrate)
PHPMA poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylamide)
PLA poly(lactic acid)
PLGA poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
PMMA poly(methyl methacrylate)
PNIPAAm poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)
PNVP poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)
PPO poly(propyleneoxide)
PVA poly(vinyl alcohol)
PVAc poly(vinyl acetate)
PVamine poly(vinyl amine)
TCP tricalcium phosphate
11
Tables and Figures
Tables
Table 1: Overview of the hydrophilic polymers used to synthesize hydrogels.
Table 2: Overview of the different solutions used to synthesize (Ca/Mg) CO3
particles.
Table 3: Overview of the solutions used for the synthesize of the small Ca/Mg
particles.
Table 4: Overview of the solutions used to prepare the big (Ca-Mg-Zn)CO3 particles.
Table 5: Summary of shape and size of the different particles.
Table 6: Summary of bands visible in each sample and the corresponding type of
particle.
Table 7: Summary of surface area of the different types of particles. For spherical
particles, surface area is calculated with A = 4 x π x r², for elliptical particles A = π x
length axial side x length radial side, for paired particles A = 2 x π x r² + 2 x π x r x h.
Figures
Figure 1: Chemical structure of GG.
Figure 2: Scanning electron micrograph of CaCO3 polymorphs: aragonite (a), vaterite
(b) and calcite (c).
Figure 3: Confocal fluorescence scanning images of spherical (a), elliptical (b), star-
like (c) and cubic (d) calcium particles. The particles are loaded with TRITC-dextran
molecules (the scale bar is 5 µm). Insets show show scanning electron microscopy
images (the scale bar is 1 µm).
Figure 4: SEM images of the particles from various reaction conditions: (a) stirring
time of 2 min at 313 K for 0 min, (b) stiring time of 4 min at 313 K for 20 min, (c) the
particles by adding the ones from into 100 mL of double deionized water with a
temperature of 353 K for 15 min, (d) for 25 min, (e) large magnification of the red
ellipse in panel d and (f) large magnification of the yellow ellipse in panel d.
Figure 5: Overview of average yield and their standard deviation of the particles.
Figure 6: SEM images of particles, in each image, the scale bar is represented.
Different magnifications are used, 2000x for sample 5, small particles; 5000x for
sample3, 4 and 5, big particles; 10.000x for sample 1 and 4, small particles and
sample 1, big particles; 20.000x for sample 2, big and small particles.
Figure 7: XRD patterns for all samples in the group of big particles (A) and in the
group of small particles (B). Each color corresponds to a type of particle (see legend
in the right top).
Figure 8: FTIR spectra of the different samples. Figure A represents the group of big
particles and figure B the group of small particles.
12
Figure 9: Graphics corresponding to time of gel formation, whereas figure A
corresponds to big particles and figure B to small particles. The axis on the left
represents the particle concentration in the gel for sample 3-5 and the axis on the
right represents the particle concentration in the gel for sample 2 (Figure 9, A). In
Figure 9, B ,the axis on the left represents the particle concentration in the gel for
sample 2 and the axis on the right represents the particle concentration in the gel for
sample 3-5. Whereas the axis on the top represents the time of gelation for sample 3-
5 and the axis on the bottom represents the gelation time for sample 2.
Figure 10: Overview of average storage modulus measured in each hydrogel for big
(A) and small (B) particles. For each sample, standard deviation is shown for a single
point.
Figure 11: FTIR spectra for the hydrogels. The spectra of the hydrogels prepared
with big particles are represented in Figure 11, A and those of the hydrogels prepared
with small particles in Figure 11, B.
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 13
University of Ghent
1 Introduction Bone regeneration is a serious issue in medicine. To overcome bone defects, defects are
filled with a material or scaffold that supports development of new tissue. Until new tissue is
formed, the scaffold has to degenerate slowly, and disappear completely until the defect is
filled with bone tissue.
Nowadays, autograft and allograft tissue is used to regenerate bone defects. Since
autografting has several disadvantages (costs, patient pain, limited supply), allografting is
used as an alternative. However, also this technique has limitations: uncertainty of disease
transmitting and biocompatibility. For these reasons novel methods, like injectable materials,
are introduced. This is a minimal invasive procedure, resulting in more patient comfort.
Second, outside the body, the material is liquid and solidifies in situ. Thereby, the defect is
completely filled since the injected material can adjust its shape.
Bone filling materials include bone cements consisting of calcium phosphates. However, this
material has some drawbacks, for example, biological active components or cells cannot be
incorporated and they don’t degenerate fast enough to make room for a new bone ingrowth.
An alternative to the above mentioned bone cements are hydrogels. Hydrogels are three-
dimensional cross-linked networks that contain a large amount of water. Therefore,
substances can be transported in and out the gel by diffusion, and maintain viability of the
cells. With the same process toxic and undesirable products can be removed. Also, such
biological active substances as calcium phosphates and calcium carbonate particles or
capsules can be incorporated to stimulate bone growth and cell proliferation. These particles
can also be loaded with drug (e.g. enzymes).
Calcium carbonate is widely used in bone regeneration, however, recent studies focus
mostly on enrichment with magnesium, iron and zinc. Magnesium promotes cell adhesion,
while iron has an influence on the cell metabolism and zinc has antibacterial effects.
In this study, (Ca2+/Mg2+) micro- and nanoparticles are prepared and mixed with Gellan gum
(GG) solution to create in-situ forming injectable hydrogel solutions. The particles are
multifunctional: first, they cross-link GG and induce hydrogel formation through release of
divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+). Since the used particles are also ceramics, they would
enhance mechanical properties of the hydrogel. The particles also induce proliferation,
adhesion and differentiation of bone forming cells.
The aim of this work is to obtain nano- and micro-sized ceramic particles with an appropriate
size, shape and chemical composition to manufacture in-situ forming injectable hydrogel
composites.
14 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
The experimental part is composed of two parts. In the first part, ceramic particles are
synthesized and their size, shape and chemical composition will be evaluated to create
hydrogels. The goal is to compare nano- and micro- particles with different Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio’s
and determine their properties.
Second, hydrogel-particle composites are prepared with the ceramic particles from the first
stage. The influence of gelation time, hydrogel strength and hydrogel on cell viability is
evaluated.
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 15
University of Ghent
2 Literature
2.1 Drug delivery
In the last years, substantial research has been done to create novel drug delivery systems.
There are several reasons to develop new platforms: (i) by creating new drug delivery
systems the efficacy and safety of the administration of the drug can improve; it can also lead
to new therapies, (ii) the production of novel drugs by genetic engineering can require more
complex delivery methods, (iii) drug response can be affected by the release pattern
(continuous vs. pulsatile), (iv) by the advances in materials and biotechnology, new systems
can be developed (Langer, 1990).
Novel drug delivery systems include several approaches, like chemical modification, drug
entrapment in small vesicles later injected in the bloodstream or drug entrapment into
polymeric materials placed in body compartments. Whereas conventional forms of drug
delivery rely on pills, ointments, eye drops and intravenous solutions (Langer, 1990). Drug
delivery is also a very important area for tissue regeneration. Bone defects, for example, are
managed using traditional methods like allografting and autografting cancellous bone (Burg,
Porter, & Kellam, 2000), using vascularized grafts from fibula and iliac crest, bone marrow
replacement and the use of bone cement fillers. Since these techniques encounter several
shortcomings (costs, patient pain, limited supply, uncertainty of disease transmitting and
biocompatibility), alternative techniques (e.g. hydrogels) are being investigated (Burg et al.,
2000).
One of the novel approaches in drug delivery systems for bone defects is the use of
hydrogels because of their unique properties (porous structure, biocompatibility,
biodegradability and deformability). They have a highly porous structure, which permits
loading of drugs into their matrix. In addition, the rate of drug release depends on the
porosity; which is influenced by the diffusion rate of the molecule through the gel matrix
(Hoare & Kohane, 2008). Another advantage of hydrogels is that they are injectable. Before
injection, hydrogels are aqueous solutions which would become a gel under physiological
conditions. Using this method bioactive compounds or cells can be integrated providing an
advantage of minimal surgical wounds. This is done by mixing before injection and the
injected material can fill gaps irrespective of the shape of the defect (Yu & Ding, 2008).
An ideal injectable hydrogel should have the following characteristics: (i) the sol state should
have a low viscosity (this allows a smaller pinpoint injection), (ii) gelation should happen after
the injection, (iii) the gels should be biodegradable or (gradually) dissolvable, (iv) the polymer
and the products should be biodegradable (Yu & Ding, 2008).
16 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
2.2 Hydrogel
Hydrogels are two- or multicomponent systems in a three-dimensional network containing
cross-linked polymer chains, where the space between the macromolecules is filled with
water (Ahmed, 2015). They can absorb water if hydrophilic groups (-OH, -SO3H, -CONH,
etc.) are present. In that case the hydrogels can be hydrated for more than 90% wt. Their
ability to absorb water can also be limited (<5-10% wt.) if they contain groups with
hydrophobic characteristics (e.g. PLA and PLGA) (Hamidi, Azadi, & Rafiei, 2008). According
to the type of cross-linking, hydrogels can be classified into two groups: a chemical gel where
the network is cross-linked via a covalent bond and a physical gel where a physical
association between nanoparticles and polymer chains forms the gel (like molecular
entanglements, and/or ionic, H-bonding or hydrophobic forces). Although in some cases,
both types of cross-linking can occur in the same gel (Hoffman, 2012; Yu & Ding, 2008).
During the swelling process, the most polar, hydrophilic groups will be hydrated. The portion
of water used, is defined as primary bound water. If these groups are hydrated, the network
swells and the hydrophobic groups are exposed. These groups will interact with water
through hydrophobic interactions, while the portion of water needed for this process is
referred to secondary bound water. (Patel & Mequanint). The primary and secondary bound
water together are defined as total bound water. After these interactions, more water can be
absorbed through the osmotic driving force of the network. However, this additional swelling
is opposed by the presence of crosslink junctions through an elastic network retraction force.
Finally, an equilibrium swelling level will be established if there is a balance between the
refraction force and the dilution force. The water absorbed beyond the total water is defined
as free or bulk water (Patel & Mequanint).
Three different types of polymers are used to synthesize hydrogels: natural, semi or semi-
synthetic polymers.
Table 1 on the following page gives an overview of hydrophilic polymers used for hydrogels
(Hamidi et al., 2008).
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 17
University of Ghent
Table 1: Overview of the hydrophilic polymers used to synthesize hydrogels. (Hamidi et al., 2008)
Hydrophilic polymers used in preparation of hydrogels
Natural polymers and their derivatives
Anionic polymers: HAA, alginic acid, pectin, carrageenan, chondroitin sulfate, dextran sulfate,
GG
Cationic polymers: chitosan, polylysine
Amphipathic polymers: collagen (and gelatin), carboxymethyl chitin, fibrin
Neutral polymers: dextran, agarose, pullulan
Synthetic polymers
Polyesters: PEG–PLA–PEG, PEG–PLGA–PEG, PEG–PCL–PEG, PLA–PEG–PLA, PHB,
P(PF-co-EG)6acrylate end groups, P(PEG/PBO terephthalate)
Other polymers: PEG-bis-(PLA-acrylate), PEG6CDs, PEG-g-P(AAm-co-Vamine),
PAAm, P(NIPAAm-co-AAc), P(NIPAAm-co-EMA), PVAc/PVA, PNVP, P(MMA-co-HEMA),
P(AN-co-allyl sulfonate), P(biscarboxy-phenoxy-phosphazene), P(GEMA-sulfate)
Combinations of natural and synthetic polymers
P(PEG-co-peptides), alginate-g-(PEO–PPO–PEO), P(PLGA-co-serine), collagen-acrylate,
alginate-acrylate, P(HPMA-g-peptide), P(HEMA/Matrigel®), HA-g-NIPAAm
An aqueous environment protects cells and sensitive drugs incorporated in the hydrogel and
allows transportation of substances in and out of the gel (Gkioni, Leeuwenburgh, Douglas,
Mikos, & Jansen, 2010). The viability of the cells can be maintained through diffusion of
substances like oxygen and nutrients. The same process will remove toxic and undesirable
products (T. L. A. Douglas, Aparicio, & Ginebra, 2015).
Hydrogels have a wide range of applications, in the last years a lot of research has been
done in their use as drug delivery system, tissue engineering and regenerative medicines
(Ahmed, 2015).
Advantages and disadvantages
Hydrogels have several benefits: they are porous, their porosity can be influenced by
changing the density of the crosslinks. The porosity also permits loading of drugs into the gel.
They are generally highly biocompatible, which is promoted through the high water content
and their similar structure to native extracellular matrix. Another advantage is that the
biodegradability can be regulated easily. This can be done via hydrolytic, enzymatic or
environmental (e.g. pH, temperature) pathways. Hydrogels can deform easily and adopt to
the shape of surface, which they are applied to (Hoare & Kohane, 2008).
However, there are also some limitations. If a gel is loaded, then it can dissolve premature or
flow away from a targeted site because of its low tensile strength. There are also problems
related to drug delivery. In the case of hydrophobic drugs, the quantity and homogeneity of
the drug loaded into the gel can be limited. If the hydrogel contains high amounts of water
and has large pores, hydrophobic drugs will be released in the time span of hours to days.
18 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
Also, the ease of application may be limited: some hydrogels are deformable and can be
injected, while other have to be placed surgically (Hoare & Kohane, 2008).
2.3 Gellan gum
Gellan gum (GG) is an anionic polysaccharide that is produced by the gram-negative
bacterium Sphingomonas paucimobilis during aerobic fermentation. GG forms a linear
structure consisting of β-D-glucose, β-D-glucuronic acid and α-L-rhamnose in a molar ratio of
2:1:1 and two acyl groups (acetate and glycerate) bound to the glucose residue adjacent to
glucuronic acid (Figure 1) (T. E. Douglas, Wlodarczyk, et al., 2014).
Figure 1: Chemical structure of GG (T. E. Douglas, Wlodarczyk, et al., 2014).
There are two forms of GG, an acetylated and a deacetylated form. Both of these forms can
gelate, but the mechanical properties vary from soft and elastic (acetylated form) to hard and
brittle (fully deacetylated) (Oliveira et al., 2010).
GG has a lot advantages: it is injectable, thermos-settable, not expensive, not derived from
animals and has a high affinity for mono- and divalent cations (e.g. Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+)(T. E.
Douglas, Piwowarczyk, et al., 2014). As biomedical application, GG has several benefits: it
lacks toxicity, can be processed under mild conditions, can be used in a minimally invasive
manner, and, due to the glucuronic acid, it has a structural similarity to native cartilage
glycosaminoglycans (Oliveira et al., 2010).
The gel is formed using the following process: GG has a coil form at high temperatures. If the
temperature decreases, a thermally reversible coil to double-helix transition occurs. After this
prerequisite form, junction zones are formed; these are oriented bundles consisting of anti-
parallel double helices. In the final step, the junction zones are linked together with untwined
zones of polysaccharide chains (these are in the form of extended helical chains). This leads
to the formation of a three-dimensional network (Oliveira et al., 2010).
Gel formation depends on the polymer concentration, temperature and the presence of
mono- and divalent cations. If structurally stable gels are synthesized, the presence of
cations is critical. At low GG concentrations, an ordered structure can be formed through
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 19
University of Ghent
helix formation and partial aggregation. But the helical aggregates don’t form a gel since they don’t form a continuous network. The carboxyl groups repel each other (through electrostatic
interactions), hindering the aggregation and tight binding of the helices. Introduction of
cations shield the repulsion and solves the problem of formation of aggregated and tight
bound helices (Oliveira et al., 2010). Gel strength depends on other parameters like acetyl
content, type and concentration of ions, pH and hydrophilic ingredients (Bajaj, A., Survase,
Saudagar, & Singhal, 2007).
GG is widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industry due to its minimal toxicity. It is
also used in biomedical application, for example, GG is a versatile encapsulating agent and
active ingredient in drug delivery systems. GG can be also used for wound healing and more
recently in tissue engineering (Ferris, Gilmore, Wallace, & Panhuis, 2013). The major
drawback of GG is its mechanical properties (i.e. stiffness) (Coutinho et al., 2010). There are
multiple solutions available to overcome this problem, for example, T. E. Douglas,
Piwowarczyk, et al incorporated bioglass particles in GG (T. E. Douglas, Piwowarczyk, et al.,
2014). Another solution is the incorporation of polydopamine, which enhances the stiffness
of hydrogels (T. E. Douglas, Wlodarczyk, et al., 2014). Another example is mineralization of
hydrogels with zinc-phosphate (by using alkaline phosphate) (T. E. Douglas et al., 2015) or
mineralization with ceramics such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3), magnesium enriched
CaCO3 and magnesium carbonate mediated by using urease (Timothy Douglas et al.). So
ceramics represent an interesting solution for enhancement of mechanical properties of
hydrogels.
20 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
2.4 Ceramic biomaterials
According to Barsoum & Barsoum, ceramics can be described as “solid compounds that are
formed by the application of heat, and sometimes heat and pressure, comprising at least one
metal and a nonmetallic elemental solid or a nonmetal, a combination of at least two
nonmetallic elemental solids, or a combination of at least two nonmetallic elemental solids
and a nonmetal.” Ceramics are used due to their positive effects in regard with interactions
with human tissues (Barsoum & Barsoum, 2002).
The ceramics comprise of calcium phosphates, silica, alumina, zirconia and titanium dioxide.
The characteristics of these ceramics are: low or non-existing biodegradability, good body
response and high mechanical strength. Because of the poor degradability, these materials
don’t appear to be used in tissue engineering. However, this problem can be overcome by
introducing porosity (Habraken, Wolke, & Jansen, 2007).
Calcium phosphates (CaP) are one of the most widely studied ceramics. They include
hydroxyapatite (HA) (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2), tricalcium phosphate (TCP), and tetracalcium
phosphate. Calcium phosphates have several benefits: protein free, minimal immunologic
reactions and no foreign body reactions or systemic toxicity have been reported (Burg et al.,
2000). They also have a good biocompatibility due to their resemblance to bone mineral
(chemical and crystal) structure. CaP have been reported to support the attachment,
differentiation, and proliferation of cells (osteoblasts and mesenchymal). The drawbacks of
CaP are low fracture toughness, high stiffness and brittleness. The mechanical properties of
CaP depend on the amorphous phase, micro-porosity and grain size. The mechanical
stiffness decrease, if the volume of amorphous phase, the porosity and grain size increase
(Chen, Zhu, & Thouas, 2012).
One of the most important groups is biological HA, it contains minor trace elements like
carbonate (CO3), magnesium (Mg) and sodium (Na). Several studies have shown that the
formula of biological (or carbonated) HA is approximate to (Ca, X)10(PO4, HPO4, CO3)6(OH,
Y)2 where X can be cations like Mg or Na who can replace Ca and Y can be anions like F or
Cl who can replace OH. Since carbonated HA contains CO3, the use of CO3 in biomaterials is
reported (Rahaman, 2014).
Another group of ceramics used are Na-containing silicate bioactive glasses. The basic
constituents of these are, SiO2, P2O5, Na2O and CaO. The benefits of these glasses are
excellent bioactivity and the ability to chemically bind the host bone through a carbonated
phosphate surface layer. They have the ability to induce bone growth processes like enzyme
activity, revascularization, osteoblast adhesion and differentiation, gene expression and
growth factor production. A key reason to use this material is that the range of some
chemical properties can be controlled and thus the rate of bio resorption (Chen et al., 2012).
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 21
University of Ghent
More recently, bioactive glasses were doped with magnesium (Mg), zinc (Zn) or strontium
(Sr). The release of these elements would accelerate the proliferation of bone marrow
mesenchymal stem cells and the ALP activity in vitro (Wang, Li, Ito, & Sogo, 2011).
It can be noted that a particulate form of ceramic materials containing calcium or magnesium
ions would be useful for spreading the ceramics in the doped materials. Magnesium or
calcium ions could also be useful to prepare calcium carbonate particles and magnesium
carbonate particles.
2.4.1 Ceramic Particles
Ceramic particles can be added to the polymer (hydrogel) to increase its mechanical stiffness
and/or make it more osteoconductive.
Typically the particles are be prepared by mixing aqueous solutions containing reactants.
The particles synthesized during this work contain calcium, magnesium and a mixture of
calcium and magnesium ions.
Calcium
The divalent cation Ca2+ plays an important role in human health. Bone consists of calcium.
The calcium inside bone is a reserve for a calcium deficiency in the blood. It maintains the
balance between bone formation and resorption. It has a vital role in metabolism, blood
clotting, nerve impulse conduction, cellular communication and muscle contraction (Weaver
& Heaney, 2007). As it is mentioned above, the addition of calcium ions will result in cross-
linking of the hydrogel.
Magnesium
Magnesium is a cofactor in a lot enzymatic reactions which are involved in nucleic acid,
protein and lipid synthesis and directly stimulates osteoblast proliferation (Castiglioni,
Cazzaniga, Albisetti, & Maier, 2013; Suchanek et al., 2004). Magnesium is important for the
bone strength and growth, muscle contraction and several metabolic reactions (Song, 2007).
Magnesium introduction in HA has a positive effect on the osseo-integrational properties
(Cacciotti, 2016).
22 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
2.4.2 CaCO3 Particles
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) has become one of the most popular cores for polymer particle
templating. These particles have several benefits: a simple preparation procedure (Y. I.
Svenskaya et al., 2016), low costs, good biocompatibility (Bogdan V Parakhonskiy et al.,
2013) and mild decomposition conditions (Y. Svenskaya et al., 2013). The main advantage of
CaCO3 is the possibility to control size and shape of the particles during synthesis. Because
the synthesis of calcium carbonate particles is sensitive to reagent concentration,
temperature, intensity and duration of stirring the reaction mixture (Trushina, Sulyanov,
Bukreeva, & Kovalchuk, 2015; Volodkin, 2014), these parameters need to be controlled
throughout the reaction.
There are three anhydrous polymorphs form of CaCO3: vaterite, calcite and aragonite. The
least stable form is vaterite, whereas calcite is the most stable one. However, the most
attractive form for technical applications with micrometer-sized particles is vaterite, because
of its highly porous structure and a large surface area (Volodkin, 2014). Variation of the
synthesis parameters allows for the preparation of particles in the size range from 500
nanometers to 10 micrometers. The metastable vaterite particles can re-crystallize in an
aqueous solution to calcite (which has a lower solubility) (B. V. Parakhonskiy et al., 2014).
Figure 2: Scanning electron micrograph of CaCO3 polymorphs: aragonite (a), vaterite (b) and calcite (c). (Volodkin, 2014)
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 23
University of Ghent
Only vaterite particles can be prepared by mixing a supersaturated salt solution at an optimal
temperature of 20-50 °C. After the synthesis, a channel-like porous structure appears with a
pore size of 20-40 nm (Volodkin, 2014).
Controlling the size of the particles is important for its applications. If the particles are used in
drug delivery systems, they have to move through blood vessels. Therefore, the size of the
particles has to be sufficiently small (Trushina et al., 2015).
CaCO3 with a defined size (3-20 µm) can be prepared by mixing of CaCl2 and Na2CO3 under
a vigorous stirring. The mixing of these salts results in the formation of nuclei, followed by the
growth of vaterite crystals. If the amount of salt and concentrations are not changed, then a
higher number of nuclei are initially formed, crystal size will be smaller. Also, the stirring time
and stirring speed have an influence, the higher these parameters are, the smaller the
crystals will be (Volodkin, 2014).
However, it is impossible to increase the time of the reaction, because of the recrystallization
process from vaterite to a more stable calcite. For this reason, Bogdan V Parakhonskiy,
Haase, & Antolini (Bogdan V Parakhonskiy, Haase, & Antolini, 2012) suggested to add
organic solvents (ethylene glycol (EG)) to increase the viscosity and decrease the solubility
of the vaterite particles. This results in a decreasing recrystallization rate to calcite and
provides a better ion distribution via extended stirring time. Porous vaterite particles with a
size of 400 nm have been reported using these method (Bogdan V Parakhonskiy et al.,
2012).
Such small particles can be used as drug delivery system and successfully immobilize drugs
(Y. Svenskaya, Gorin, Parakhonskiy, & Sukhorukov, 2015). They can also penetrate through
cell membranes (B. Parakhonskiy et al., 2015).
Shapes of CaCO3
By controlling the crystallization reaction, isotropic (spherical and cubical) and anisotropic
(elliptical and star-like) particles can be synthesized. Cubic particles are prepared, if vaterite
recrystallizes to calcite. To prevent the formation of calcite (or cubical particles) EG can be
added. EG reduces solubility of the particles, so that no calcite will be formed (B. V.
Parakhonskiy et al., 2014).
24 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
Figure 3: Confocal fluorescence scanning images of spherical (a), elliptical (b), star-like (c) and cubic (d) calcium particles. The particles are loaded with TRITC-dextran molecules (the scale bar is 5 µm). Insets show show scanning electron microscopy images (the scale bar is 1 µm). (B. V. Parakhonskiy et al., 2014)
B. V. Parakhonskiy et al determined the influence of time, solvent (water vs 80% EG) and
ratio of salt concentrations (CaCl2 and Na2CO3) on the synthesis of CaCO3 particles (B. V.
Parakhonskiy et al., 2014). Spherical particles can be created by mixing the two salts in
equal concentrations. Elliptical particles can be produced by varying the ratio of the salt
concentrations. Star-like particles are formed by aggregation of the vaterite crystals on a
common nucleus, which is the result of competition between growth and nucleation
processes (B. V. Parakhonskiy et al., 2014).
Comparison between the particles shows that vaterite particles have a better loading
efficiency than calcite particles. Star-like particles have the highest surface area followed by
elliptical and spherical particles (B. V. Parakhonskiy et al., 2014). The shape of the particles
also has an influence on the activity of encapsulated molecules. Star-like particles have a
significantly higher enzymatic activity (of encapsulated molecules) than elliptical, spherical
and rhomboidal particles, while their loading capacity is just slightly higher (Donatan et al.,
2016).
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 25
University of Ghent
2.4.3 MgCO3 Particles
Magnesium carbonate has been widely used in various industrial applications
(pharmaceuticals, rubber industry, cosmetics, precursor for magnesium based chemicals,
etc). It includes magnesite (MgCO3), nesquehonite (MgCO3.3H2O), hydromagnesite
(Mg5(CO3)4(OH)2.4H2O), lansfordite (MgCO3.5H2O) and artinite (Mg5(CO3)4(OH)2.4H2O),
whereas magnesite is the most stable Mg-carbonate (Hänchen, Prigiobbe, Baciocchi, &
Mazzotti, 2008; Zhang et al., 2006).
However, it is impossible to form magnesite at ambient temperature. The minimum reported
temperature to form magnesite was 60-100°C and needs an elevated CO2 pressure
(Giammar, Bruant Jr, & Peters, 2005). When aqueous solutions are used at a temperature of
25°C and a moderate CO2 pressure close to ambient pressure, nesquehonite is formed
(Zhang et al., 2006). If the temperature is higher (approximately 40°C), mostly
hydromagnesite is formed (Hänchen et al., 2008). Magnesite can also be formed from a
transition of hydromagnesite. At a temperature below 150°C and a low pressure, this
transition can take days. However, it can be accelerated by using a higher temperature, high
CO2 pressure and introducing a high salinity (Hänchen et al., 2008).
Shapes of MgCO3
Zhang et al created various morphologies of magnesium carbonate depending on the
reaction characteristics (time, pH, etc), Figure 4. At a temperature lower than 328 K and a
low pH, needle-like MgCO3.xH2O (whereas x depends on the reaction characteristics) is
formed, Figure 4 (b). At higher temperatures (higher than 333 K) and a high pH, spherical
Mg5(CO3)4(OH)2.4H2O can be synthesized. (Zhang et al., 2007)
Spherical-like particles with a diameter of 15-17 µm can be synthesized by mixing two
aqueous solutions (Mg(NO3)2 and K2CO3) for 0.5 min at 353 K (Zhang et al., 2007).
One important parameter in this reaction is time. Zhang et al have shown that at a low time
the particles form agglomerates built of fine grains. If time increases, a serpentine strip
occurs and if time increases further, spherical-like particles are produced, Figure 4 (d). Two
other important parameters are temperature and stirring time. The particles have a
morphology ranging from spherical to nest-like and a decrease in diameter, with an
increasing temperature. An increasing stirring time decreases the particles size, and the
morphology changes from spherical-like to nest-like and further from nest-like to cake-like
and dumbbell-like (Zhang et al., 2007).
26 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
Figure 4: SEM images of the particles from various reaction conditions: (a) stirring time of 2 min at 313 K for 0
min, (b) stiring time of 4 min at 313 K for 20 min, (c) the particles by adding the ones from into 100 mL of double deionized water with a temperature of 353 K for 15 min, (d) for 25 min, (e) large magnification of the red ellipse in panel d and (f) large magnification of the yellow ellipse in panel d (Zhang et al., 2007).
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 27
University of Ghent
2.5 Particles for gelation
Particles can be used to induce gelation of hydrogels. Carbonate particles have been
reported to induce gelation of different types of hydrogels. Pectin hydrogels prepared with
carbonate particles cause gelation when acidification is introduced. Baldursdóttir & Kjøniksen
have synthesized (Baldursdóttir & Kjøniksen, 2005) these gels using D-glucono-δ-lactone
(GDL) for acidification. Moreira et al used NaHCO3 instead of GDL for acidification (Moreira
et al., 2014).
Carbonate particles are also used to synthesize alginate hydrogels. Kuo & Ma reported the
preparation of alginate hydrogels, using both CaCO3-GDL and CaCO3-GDL-CaSO4 systems
(Kuo & Ma, 2001).
Gellan gum gelation can be introduced using microparticles and bioglasses. TE Douglas et al
have reported the synthesis of GG using magnesium/calcium carbonates and calcium and
magnesium carbonates (TE Douglas et al., 2016). Bioglasses consisting of oxides (SiO2,
CaO, Na2O and P2O5) in several proportions can induce GG gelation due to the slow release
of divalent ions (T. E. Douglas, Piwowarczyk, et al., 2014; Gorodzha et al., 2016). Grasdalen
& Smidsrød studied the effect of the type of cation and ionic strength on gelation of GG
(Grasdalen & Smidsrød, 1987). They found that for divalent cations the gel strength
increased in following order:
Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, Ba2+ < Zn2+ < Cu2+ < Pb2+
During this work, GG gelation will be introduced due to addition of calcium,
calcium/magnesium and magnesium carbonate particles.
28 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
3 Goals
3.1 Characterization of micro- and nanoparticles
The goal of the first part is to design new particles consisting of calcium/magnesium
carbonate particles by varying reaction parameters (reaction time, addition of organic solvent
and Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio). The influence of these parameters will be evaluated regarding the size,
shape, porosity and crystallinity of the particles. The size and shape of the particles will be
evaluated using electron microscopy. Whereas the crystallinity will be evaluated using X-ray
diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
3.2 Identification of hydrogel properties
In the second part, the influence of size, shape, crystallinity and concentration of the particles
will be evaluated regarding hydrogel gelation. First, the influence of the type of particle and
particle concentration will be studied regarding the time of hydrogel gelation and hydrogel
strength. In the final steps, the influence of particle distribution in the hydrogel on cell viability
will be evaluated using microCT and cell viability tests.
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 29
University of Ghent
4 Materials and Methods
4.1 Materials
Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), calcium chloride (CaCl2), magnesium chloride (MgCl2), calcium
carbonate (CaCO3), Gellan gum (Gelzan™ CM) and ethylene glycol are all purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich without any further purification. Ethanol is purchased from Chem-Lab.
4.2 Methods
4.2.1 Synthesis of the particles
Synthesis of big (Mg-Ca)CO3 particles
Following solutions are used to synthesize the particles (Table 2):
Table 2: Overview of the different solutions used to synthesize big (Ca/Mg)CO3 particles.
Solution CaCl2 (mol/L) MgCl2 (mol/L)
1 0,333 0,000
2 0,248 0,083
3 0,165 0,165
4 0,083 0,248
5 0,000 0,333
Big particles are synthesized by mixing 2 mL of 0,33 M Na2CO3 with 2 mL of one of the
solutions from Table 2. The mixture is mixed using a magnetic stirrer at 750x during 1 minute
at room temperature. Afterwards the mixture is poured in 2 mL reaction tubes and
centrifuged for 5 minutes at 3000 RPM. The supernatant is removed and the pellet is washed
twice with ethanol (70%) and centrifuged (3000 RPM, 5 min.) after washing. The samples are
dried for 10 hours at 70°C for storage.
Later during this work, particles synthesized using solution 1-5 will be referred to as resp.
sample 1-5.
Synthesis of small (Mg-Ca)CO3 particles
Table 3: Overview of the solutions used for the synthesis of small (Ca/Mg)CO3 particles.
Solution CaCl2 (mol/L) MgCl2 (mol/L) Ethylene Glycol (mL)
1 0,333 0,000 10,0
2 0,248 0,083 10,0
3 0,165 0,165 10,0
4 0,083 0,248 10,0
5 0,000 0,333 10,0
To synthesize small particles, 2 mL Na2CO3 + 10 mL ethylene glycol are added to one of the
solutions from Table 3. The mixture is mixed using a magnetic stirrer at 750x during 3 hours.
After mixing, the solution is poured into tubes of 50 mL and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 3000
RPM. After centrifugation, the supernatant is removed and the pellet will be washed twice
30 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
with ethanol (70%) like the big particles. Before storage the samples are dried for 10 hours at
70°C.
Later during this work, particles synthesized using solution 1-5 will be referred to as resp.
sample 1-5.
4.2.2 Characterization of the particles
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
The size and shape of the synthesized particles are evaluated by SEM. A
MIRA/TESCAN instrument is used for this purpose. The acceleration voltage is 30 kV and
the magnification ranges from 2-200 kx. Before analysis, a drop of 10 µL is put on the silica
plate and dried under vacuum.
X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
Powder x-ray diffraction analysis of the polycrystalline samples was performed with a Rigaku
Miniflex-600 diffract meter (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The XRD data were recorded
using Cu-Kα radiation (40 kV, 15 mA, Ni-Kβ filter) in the 2θ range 10–80° at a scan speed
1°/min. The crystalline phases were identified with the use of integrated X-ray powder
diffraction software (PDXL: Rigaku Diffraction Software) and ICDD PDF-2 datasets (Release
2014 RDB).
FTIR
A FTIR spectrometer from Bruker (VERTEX 70) in reflection mode is used to obtain infrared
spectra from the different types of particles. The spectra are recorded in a range of 150-4200
cm-1. The spectrum of each sample is measured 15 times and the average spectrum is
calculated.
ANOVA Analysis
ANOVA (Analysis of variances) is an analysis tool to test whether there are statistically
differences between the means of two groups in an experiment. This analysis is performed
with SPSS Statistics which is a software package for statistical analysis.
4.2.3 Synthesis of Gellan gum
Gellan gum was dissolved in double-distilled water at a concentration of 0.875 % (w/v). The
solution was autoclaved for 15 minutes at 121 C.
4.2.4 Preparation of the hydrogels
Hydrogels prepared during this work contain resp. 2%, 4% and 30% of the particles. The
preparation is carried out in 2 mL reaction tube (Greiner Bio-One). 300 µL of distilled water is
added to the particles. The particles are dispersed using an ultrasonic bath (Sonorex Super
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 31
University of Ghent
10P, Bandelin) for 30 seconds at room temperature. Afterwards 500 µL of Gellan gum is
added and mixed with the particles by shaking the reaction tubes.
4.2.5 Investigation of the hydrogel properties
Rheological properties
A rheometer (AR-1000 N, TA Instruments) is used to study the visco-elastic properties of the
hydrogels. The rheometer consist of a stainless steel plate and an acrylic cone of 40 mm.
The storage (G’) and loss modulus (G’’) are recorded at 22°C with a frequency of 1 Hz and
an angular frequency of 6,283 rad/s.
FTIR
A FTIR spectrometer from Bruker (VERTEX 70) in reflection mode is used to obtain infrared
spectra from the different types of particles. The spectra are recorded in a range of 150-4200
cm-1. Before measuring the spectra, the hydrogels are dried on a heater at 65°C for 30
minutes. The spectrum of each sample is measured 15 times and the average spectrum is
calculated.
ANOVA Analysis
ANOVA (Analysis of variances) is an analysis tool to test whether there are statistically
differences between the means of two groups in an experiment. This analysis is performed
with SPSS Statistics which is a software package for statistical analysis.
32 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
5 Results and Discussion In the first part, the newly synthesized particles are characterized. On the one hand, a
comparison of the particles is performed between samples containing particles prepared in
different reaction conditions (reaction time and absence or presence of an organic solvent)
but with the same Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio. On the other hand, samples containing particles with a
different Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio but prepared in the same reaction conditions (reaction time and
absence or presence of an organic solvent) are compared. First, the influence of the
Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio and reaction conditions (reaction time and absence or presence of an organic
solvent) on the size and shape of the particles is investigated by taking SEM images of the
particles. Next, the crystallinity of the synthesized particles is studied using X-ray diffraction
and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
In the second part, hydrogels are prepared with the designed particles. Gelation time is
investigated for the different samples with varying particle concentrations. This test is
conducted to study the influence of size and shape of the particles and particle concentration
on the gelation time. Also gel stiffness is measured by rheometry tests. During these tests,
influence type of particle and particle concentration is investigated.
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 33
University of Ghent
5.1 Characterization of the particles
5.1.1 Yield of the Particles
After each synthesis, the reaction yield of the particles is determined. Figure 5 gives an
overview of the average reaction yield and standard deviation of respectively big and small
particles (Attachment 1, Table 1). Statistical analysis is done using SPSS Statistics 24 to
compare the reaction yield of each sample within and between the group of small and big
particles.
Figure 5: Overview of average yield and their standard deviation of the particles.
One-way ANOVA is performed to compare yield within both groups with a significant
difference for p<0,05. Analysis shows that in the group of big particles, Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio has
no influence on the reaction yield and thus on the ion distribution. In the other group,
according to ANOVA analysis (Attachment 1, Table 5) there is a difference between the
samples in this group (p<0,05). However, if a post-hoc analysis is done (Attachment 1, Table
6) no difference can be noticed (p>0,05). This can be explained due to the fact that with
ANOVA the significance is slightly smaller (p=0,049) than p=0,05. So also in this group, there
is no influence of Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio on the ion distribution in these reactions.
34 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
Also, comparison of reaction yield between samples from both groups is done. This analysis
(ANOVA) shows that no difference can be determined between the same samples in both
groups. This shows that the reaction yield is independent of reaction time, Ca2+:Mg2+ and
addition of organic solvent.
The reaction yield from sample one in the group of big particles (59,59 %) is lower than the
reaction yield from the particles synthesized by Y. I. Svenskaya et al (74 % with a magnetic
stirrer and 85,9% with ultrasonic agitation) (Y. I. Svenskaya et al., 2016).
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 35
University of Ghent
5.1.2 SEM Images
Sample Big Particles Small Particles
1
2
3
36 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
4
5
Figure 6: SEM images of particles, in each image, the scale bar is represented. Different magnifications are
used, 2000x for sample 5, small particles; 5000x for sample3, 4 and 5, big particles; 10.000x for sample 1 and 4, small particles and sample 1, big particles; 20.000x for sample 2, big and small particles.
Size and shape of the particles are determined based on images in Figure 6 and additional
images (Attachment 2). ImageJ is used to determine size and standard deviation of the
different types of particles (Table 5), for this purpose size of 100 particles of each different
type in each sample is determined.
Comparison between the groups of big and small particles shows that in sample 1 spherical
vaterite particles occur in both groups whereas in sample 1 in the first group also cubical
calcite particles are present. In sample 2 in the group of big particles, spherical particles
appear and in the other group elliptical particles. Sample 3 contains spherical vaterite
particles (in the group of small particles) and star-forming and two-connected to each other
particles, which we will refer to throughout this work as paired (Figure 6) particles in the
group of big particles. The former two types of particles are aggregates formed by vaterite,
whereas the paired particles seem to exist out of two spherical particles and the star-forming
particles out of multiple vaterite particles forming several layers (Attachment 2, Figure 4).
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 37
University of Ghent
Samples 4 and 5 consist of an amorphous phase for both big and small particles. However,
in sample 4 in the group of small particles, star-like particles are detected in the amorphous
phase suggesting the presence of vaterite.
This shows that with an increasing Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio, the morphology of the particles changes.
However, if the ratio is increased above 1:1, than amorphous particles are prepared.
Table 5 summarizes size and standard deviation of the different types of particles. For
spherical particles, diameter of the particles is measured. For the elliptical and paired
particles, the axial and radial sides are determined. For the group of big particles, sizes are in
the range of 1,6 – 8,2 µm. Whereas for the other group, sizes are in a lower range: 0,6 – 2,5
µm. Addition of organic solvent and an increasing reaction time decreases particle size.
Table 5: Summary of shape and size of the different particles.
Big Particles Small Particles
Size (µm) SD (µm)
Size (µm) SD (µm)
Sample 1 Sample 1
Big Spherical 3,3 ± 0,4 Big Spherical 1,3 ± 0,2
Small Spherical 1,6 ± 0,3 Small Spherical 0,6 ± 0,1
Sample 2 Sample 2
Spherical 2,7 ± 0,5 Axial Side 1,7 ± 0,3
Radial Side 2,5 ± 0,4
Sample 3 Sample 3
Paired Particles 8,2 ± 3,2 ± 21,3 ± 0,4 Spherical 1,3 ± 0,3
Star-Forming 7,1 ± 3,2 ± 1,1 ± 0,5
Sample 4 Sample 4
Amorphous - - Amorphous - -
Sample 5 Sample 5
Amorphous - - Amorphous - -
38 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
5.1.3 XRD Data
Figure 7: XRD patterns for all samples in the group of big particles (A) and in the group of small particles (B).
Each color corresponds to a type of particle (see legend in the right top).
In the group of big particles, samples 1 and 2 show peaks at 2θ values 21,0; 25,0; 27;2; 32,8;
43,9; 49,1; 50,1 and 55,8; all corresponding to vaterite (Le Bail, Ouhenia, & Chateigner,
2011). Also calcite peaks occur in these samples at 29,5; 36,0; 39,5 and 47,7 (Sitepu, 2009).
This suggests that in both samples vaterite and calcite is present. In the SEM images
however, calcite particles (cubical) are only detected in sample 1. In sample 3 peaks occur at
27,2 and 32,8 suggesting the presence of vaterite and also at 36,0 a peak is shown,
corresponding to calcite. Next to these, peaks at 31,9 and 45,5 are present, which are
characteristic for NaCl (Strel’tsov, Tsirel’son, Ozerov, & Golovanov, 1987). Also at 15,3 and
38,3 peaks can be found. Both peaks are characteristic for hydromagnesite (Botha &
Strydom, 2003). However, in the SEM images no calcite is present in this sample. Samples 4
A
B
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 39
University of Ghent
and 5 show a very broad peak at approximately 26,0 suggesting the presence of an
amorphous phase. SEM images of these samples show an amorphous phase confirming the
XRD spectra. In sample 5 however, a peak at 15,3 suggests the presence of hydromagnesite
(Botha & Strydom, 2003). TE Douglas et al also found hydromagnesite in particles created
with varying Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio’s. However, this was indicated by a peak shift from 29,5 to 29,9
and shifts in the range of 2θ of 30-50. (TE Douglas et al., 2016)
In the group of small particles, samples 1 and 3 have a similar XRD spectrum, probably due
to a mix-up of the samples. Both spectra show peaks at 21,0; 25,0; 27,2; 32,8; 42,7; 43,9;
49,0; 50,1 and 55,8 all characteristic for vaterite (Le Bail et al., 2011). This suggests that only
vaterite is present in this sample. Regarding this result, the XRD spectrum probably refers to
sample 1, since in the group of big particles only calcite and vaterite peaks are present in
sample 1. Whereas in sample 3 also peaks of hydromagnesite occur in the group of big
particles. However, also the SEM images show similar particles in both samples. This is
probably also the result of a mix-up between the samples. In sample 2, peaks are shown at
values characteristic for calcite (Sitepu, 2009). This suggests that the particles in sample 2
recrystallized from vaterite to calcite before the XRD measurement. However these peaks
also show a shift of ± 0,4° in the range 2θ of 30-50. Also at 23,3 and 48,2 occur, suggesting
the presence of resp. hydromagnesite (Botha & Strydom, 2003) and magnesian calcite
(Paquette & Reeder, 1990). This is characteristic for the presence of magnesian calcite
(Alruopn, 1977). In the SEM images only elliptical particles are present, which are no
magnesian calcite since they have a rhombohedral structure. Samples 4 and 5 both show a
very broad peak at approximately 26,0 indicating an amorphous phase is present in these
samples. Also in the SEM images an amorphous is detected, confirming the XRD spectra.
This shows that hydromagnesite can be found in particles with a Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio of 1:1 if they
are synthesized with a low reaction time and without organic solvent. If an organic solvent is
added and reaction increased, magnesian calcite is found in particles with a Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio
of 3:1.
40 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
5.1.4 FTIR Data
Figure 8: FTIR spectra of the different samples. Figure A represents the group of big particles and figure B the
group of small particles.
Figure 8 shows all FTIR spectra for the different samples. Table 6 gives an overview of all
bands in the samples.
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
200700120017002200
Re
lati
ve T
ran
smit
tan
ce (
%)
Wavelength (cm-1)
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
Calcite
200700120017002200
Re
lati
ve T
ran
smit
tan
ce (
%)
Wavelenght (cm-1)
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
B
A
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 41
University of Ghent
Table 6: Summary of bands visible in each sample and the corresponding type of particle.
Big Particles
Sample Wavenumber (cm-1)
Calcite Vaterite Other
1 1400 1089 871 - - - - - - - - -
2 1400 - 871 712 1078 - 2359 2344 1105 860 668 610
3 1400 - 871 712 1078 - 2359 2344 1105 860 668 610
4 1400 - - - - - 2359 2344 1105 860 668 610
5 1400 - - - - - 2359 2344 1105 860 668 610
Small Particles
Sample Wavenumber (cm-1)
Calcite Vaterite Other
1 1400 - 871 - 1078 746 - - - - - -
2 1400 - 871 - 1078 - 2359 2344 1040 860 668 610
3 1400 - - - 1078 - 2359 2344 1040 860 668 610
4 1400 - - - 1078 - 2359 2344 1040 860 668 610
5 1400 - 871 - 1078 - 2359 2344 1040 860 668 610
Comparison between the samples in the group of big particles shows that in all samples
calcite is present, since all samples show a band at 1400 cm-1 (ʋ3 antisymmetric stretching)
(Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). Samples 1,2 and 3 also show a band characteristic for calcite
at 871 cm-1 (ʋ2 antisymmetric bending) (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). However, additional
calcite bands occur. Only sample 1 shows a band at 1089 cm-1 (ʋ1 symmetric stretching),
while samples 2 and 3 have a band corresponding to calcite at 712 cm-1 (ʋ4 symmetric
bending) (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). This corresponds to XRD data where calcite is found
in sample 1, 2 and 3. Whereas in samples 4 and 5 no calcite peaks are present due to the
amorphous phase. The intensity of band at 1400 cm-1 is similar in samples 2, 3 and 4 and
lower in samples 1 and 5. This indicates that the presence of calcite is lower in sample 1 and
5 than in samples 2, 3 and 4 who have more or less the same amount of calcite. According
to the FT-IR spectra, vaterite is only present in sample 2 and 3 according to a band at 1078
cm-1 (combination of ʋ4a and lattice mode 332) (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). Since the
intensity of this band is approximately the same in both samples, this suggests that both
have the same amount of vaterite. Whereas according to XRD data, vaterite is present in
sample 1,2 and 3. All samples (except sample 1) show additional bands at 2359 ,2344, 860,
668 and 610 cm-1. The first two bands (2359 and 2344 cm-1) correspond to CO2 (Zhang et al.,
2006). The bands at 860 and 668 cm-1 are characteristic of ʋ2 bending and ʋ4 bending of
free CO32-. (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991; Kloprogge, Wharton, Hickey, & Frost, 2002) The last
bands, 1105 and 610
cm-1 refer to resp. ʋ1 mode (Zhang et al., 2006) and ʋ4 of CO32- in MgCO3 (Umbreit &
Jedrasiewicz, 2000; Zhang et al., 2006). The presence of MgCO3.3H2O (nesquehonite) in
sample 2,3,4 and 5 is confirmed by the presence of bands 1105, 860 and 610 cm-1 (Zhang et
al., 2006). This is in contrast with the results obtained from the XRD data where
42 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
hydromagnesite is found in sample 3 and 5. The results differ from results obtained by TE
Douglas et al. Instead of nesquehonite, they found hydromagnesite, confirmed by bands at
1472, 1416 and 792 cm-1 (TE Douglas et al., 2016).
In the group of small particles, calcite is present in each sample. All samples show a band at
1400 cm-1. Next to this, in samples 1 and 3, a band occurs at 1089 cm-1. Also a third band
represents calcite, 871 cm-1, present in samples 2 and 5. Comparison of intensity of the
bands at 1400 cm-1 shows that sample 5 contains more calcite than the other four samples.
The band has a higher intensity in sample 3 than samples 2 and 4 (more or less same
intensity) and sample 1. This indicates that further, the amount of calcite decrease in
following order:
3 > 2 and 4 > 1. Whereas the intensity of the band at 871 cm-1 is higher in sample 1 than in
samples 2 and 5 (who have more or less the same intensity). These results are in contrast
with the XRD data where only in sample 2 calcite is found. All samples show a band at 1078
cm-1, corresponding to vaterite. Whereas only in sample 1, a band occurs at 746 cm-1 (ʋ4a
bending), characteristic of vaterite (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). According to the intensity of
band 1078 cm-1 the amount of vaterite present in the different samples decreases from
5 > 4 and 3 > 2 > 1. In the XRD spectra however, vaterite is only detected in sample 1 (and
only 1 peak in sample 2). All samples (except sample 1) also show additional bands at 2359
and 2344 cm-1 referring to the presence of CO2. Further bands occurred at 1040, 860, 668
and 610 cm-1. Representing resp. ʋ1 mode of CO32-, ʋ2 bending and ʋ4 bending of free CO3
2-
and ʋ4 of CO32- in MgCO3. Presence of nesquehonite in samples 2,3,4 and 5 could be
proved by bands 860 and 668 cm-1, however in contrast to the group of big particles no band
is found at 1105 cm-1.
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 43
University of Ghent
5.2 Investigation of gel properties
5.2.1 Gelation time
First, gelation time is studied. This is done by preparing a hydrogel and measuring time when
Gellan gum is added to the particles until a solid hydrogel is formed. Pictures are taken
before and after gel formation for big and small particles (Attachment 3, Figure 1).
In sample 1 for both small and big particles, no gel formation is introduced. As a control, a
sample containing Gellan gum and 100% commercial CaCO3 is prepared. Also in this
sample, no hydrogel is formed. The other samples all have the ability to form a gel, however,
in sample 2, a higher particle concentration is necessary than that reported for the other
samples. According to TE Douglas et al this is due to a higher release of Mg and Ca ions (in
sample 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 5) to crosslink GG (TE Douglas et al., 2016). This is induced through
a higher solubility resulting from an increased amorphicity (in sample 2 < 3 < 4 < 5) of the
crystals.
Figure 9 shows graphics of gel formation with particle concentration in function of gelation
time. In Attachment 3, Table 1 and 2 the data are found for gelation time of the different
types of particles. Graphics show that within a group of particles (small or big particles),
gelation time decreases if particle concentration in the gel increases. If more particles are
available, more ions can be released to introduce gel formation. Gelation time also
decreases if there is more magnesium present in the sample (gelation time decreases in
sample 3 to sample 5 for an equal particle concentration).
Comparison between both groups shows that samples containing small particles induce
gelation much quicker than samples containing big particles. This is due to lower surface
area of small particles 5 (Table 7), therefore ions are more easily released than from big
particles.
Table 7: Summary of surface area of the different types of particles. For spherical particles, surface area is
calculated with A = 4 x π x r², for elliptical particles A = π x length axial side x length radial side, for paired and star-forming particles A = 2 x π x r² + 2 x π x r x h.
Big Particles Small Particles
Sample 1 A (µm²) Sample 1 A (µm²)
Big Spherical 136,8 Big Spherical 21,2
Small Spherical 32,2 Small Spherical 4,5
Sample 2 Sample 2
Spherical 91,6 Elliptical 13,4
Sample 3 Sample 3
Paired Particles 98,5 Spherical 21,2
Star-Forming 87,4
44 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
Figure 9: Graphics corresponding to time of gel formation, whereas figure A corresponds to big particles and
figure B to small particles. The axis on the left represents the particle concentration in the gel for sample 3-5 and the axis on the right represents the particle concentration in the gel for sample 2 (Figure 9, A). In Figure 9, B ,the axis on the left represents the particle concentration in the gel for sample 2 and the axis on the right represents the particle concentration in the gel for sample 3-5. Whereas the axis on the top represents the time of gelation for sample 3-5 and the axis on the bottom represents the gelation time for sample 2.
15
20
25
30
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n (
%)
Time (s)
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
Sample 2
0 20 40 60 80
0
1
2
3
4
5
20
25
30
0 2 4 6 8 10
Co
cen
tra
tio
n (
%)
Time (s)
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
A
B
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 45
University of Ghent
5.2.2 Rheometry results
Figure 10 shows average storage modulus as a function of average time. Both are
determined out of three measurements of each sample. Next to the average, standard
deviation is calculated for storage modulus and time (Attachment 4, Table 1 and Table 2).
Figure 10: Overview of average storage modulus measured in each hydrogel for big (A) and small (B) particles.
For each sample, standard deviation is shown for a single point.
First, within both groups, ANOVA analysis is done with a significant difference for p<0,05 to
compare hydrogel strength for the different types of hydrogels. In the group of big particles,
hydrogel strength increases from 5 2% < 4 4% < 5 4% < 3 4% < 2 30% (the first number
represents the sample of particles used and the second one the concentration of particles in
the hydrogel). According to ANOVA analysis (Attachment 4, Table 3), only between
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
Sto
rag
e M
od
ulu
s (P
a)
Time (s)
Sample 2 30%
Sample 5 2%
Sample 3 4%
Sample 4 4%
Sample 5 4%
A
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Sto
rag
e M
od
ulu
s (P
a)
Time (s)
Sample 2 30%
Sample 4 2%
Sample 5 2%
Sample 3 4%
Sample 4 4%
Sample 5 4%
B
46 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
hydrogels 5 4% and 3 4% no significant difference is detected. This suggests that if the
particle concentration is increased from 2 to 4%, the hydrogel strength increases
significantly. In the group of small particles, hydrogel strength increases from
4 2% < 5 2% < 4 4% < 2 30% < 3 4% < 5 4%. ANOVA analysis shows that no significant
difference is detected between hydrogels 5 2%,4 4%, 2 30%, 3 4%. This confirms that if
particle concentration is increased (from 2 to 4%) the hydrogel strength increases
significantly. These results also show that Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio has no influence on gel strength. In
the group of big particles hydrogel strength increases 4 < 5 < 3 for samples with the same
amount of particles and in the other group from 4 < 3 < 5.
Hydrogels containing similar samples of particles and particle concentration from both groups
are compared using independent T-tests with a significant difference for p<0,05. This
analysis shows that significant differences between hydrogels containing small and big
particles are present. Since hydrogel strength is stronger for small particles in hydrogels
consisting of resp. particles from samples 5 containing 4 and 2% of the particles in the
hydrogel and particles from sample 4 containing 4% particles in the hydrogel. Whereas the
hydrogel strength is stronger for big particles in hydrogels consisting of resp. particles from
samples containing 30% of the particles in the hydrogel and particles from sample 3
containing 4% of the particles in the hydrogel. These results indicate that particle size (and
thus surface area) have no influence on hydrogel strength.
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 47
University of Ghent
5.2.3 FTIR Data
Figure 21: FTIR spectra for the hydrogels. The spectra of the hydrogels prepared with big particles are
represented in Figure 11, A and those of the hydrogels prepared with small particles in Figure 11, B.
Figure 11 shows FTIR spectra obtained for hydrogels containing 4 and 30% particles
prepared in point 5.2.1. In the group of big particles (A), all hydrogel samples show two
bands at 2359 and 2344 cm-1 both characteristic with CO2 (Zhang et al., 2006). They also
show in the range of 1900 to 1500 cm-1 series of bands with two bands at 1652 (H-O-H
bending of water molecules) (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991) and 1558 cm-1 (O-C-O vibration)
(Li et al., 1989) having a higher intensity then the rest. Further, all samples also have three
similar bands at 871, 860 and 668 and 227 cm-1. The first band is a characteristic of ʋ2
antisymmetric bending of calcite, the second and third are characteristic of ʋ2 bending and
ʋ4 bending of free CO32- (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991) and the last band is a characteristic of
-2.2
-1.7
-1.2
-0.7
-0.2
0.3
0.8
1.3
1.8
2.3
2007001200170022002700
Re
lati
ve I
nte
nsi
ty
Wavenumber (cm-1)
Sample 2 30%
Sample 3 4%
Sample 4 4%
Sample 5 4%
GG
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
2007001200170022002700
Re
lati
ve T
ran
smit
tan
ce (
%)
Wavelength (cm-1)
Sample 2 30%
Sample 3 4%
Sample 4 4%
Sample 5 4%
B
A
48 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
calcite (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). However, there are also differences between the
samples. The hydrogels prepared with particles from sample 2 and 3 both show a band at
1400 and 610 cm-1. The first band can corresponds to ʋ3 antisymmetric stretching of calcite
(Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). However, this band can is also a characteristic of Gellan gum.
The band at 610 cm-1 corresponds to ʋ4 of CO32- in MgCO3 (Umbreit & Jedrasiewicz, 2000).
The hydrogel containing particles from sample 2, also shows a band at 712 cm-1 representing
ʋ4 symmetric bending of calcite (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). The spectrum from the
hydrogel containing particles from sample 3 shows two bands at 1067 and 1030 cm-1
corresponding to amorphous calcium carbonate (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). In the last
spectrum (hydrogel prepared with particles from sample 5), bands are noticed at 1472 and
1416 cm-1 corresponding to ʋ3 antisymmetric stretching of carbonate groups. At 1125, 875
and 792 cm-1 three bands are present, which are characteristics of resp. ʋ1 and ʋ2 mode
CO32- (Umbreit & Jedrasiewicz, 2000) and of ʋ2 symmetric bending of carbonate groups. The
bands at 1472 and 1416 and 792 cm-1 suggest the presence of magnesium carbonate
hydromagnesite (Frost, 2011; White, 1971).
In the group of small particles, all hydrogel samples show bands at 2359 and 2344 cm-1
which are characteristic of CO2. Also series of bands are present in the range of 1900-1500
cm-1, with bands at 1652 (H-O-H bending of water molecules) (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991)
and 1558 cm-1 (O-C-O vibration) (Li et al., 1989) having the highest intensity. In this serie
also a band at 1600 cm-1 which is characteristic of Gellan gum. All samples also show bands
at 1030 corresponding with amorphous calcium carbonate (Dupuis, Ducloux, Butel, & Nahon,
1984). They also show a band at 668 cm-1 (ʋ2 antisymmetric bending of calcite). Further,
shows the spectrum from hydrogel containing particles from sample 2 bands at 1080, 871
and 860 cm-1. The two last bands correspond to ʋ2 antisymmetric bending of calcite and ʋ2
bending of free CO32-. The spectrum of the hydrogel with particles from sample 3 contains
bands at 1067, 1030 and 871 cm-1. These bands are characteristics of resp. amorphous
calcium carbonate and ʋ2 bending of free CO32- (Andersen & Brecevic, 1991). In the spectra
from the hydrogels containing particles from samples 4 and 5, a broad band is detected in
the range of 1200-900 cm-1 with a band at approximately 1030 cm-1 (amorphous calcium
carbonate) and shoulders at 1148, 1070 (amorphous carbonate) and 990 cm-1 (bicarbonate
ion (Zhang et al., 2006)). These hydrogels also show a band at 850 cm-1 characteristic for ʋ2
mode of CO32- (Zhang et al., 2006). In the spectrum of the hydrogel containing particles from
sample 5 an additional band is detected at 880 cm-1 corresponding to carbonate bending.
Since next to this band, also a band at 850 cm-1 is present, this suggests the presence of
hydromagnesite (Zhang et al., 2006).
Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules 49
University of Ghent
6 Conclusion
The aim of this work was to design a new type of calcium/magnesium carbonate particles
with characteristics suitable to create in-situ forming hydrogel composites with GG. Two main
groups of particles were created by varying the reaction time and adding an organic solvent.
Different types of particles were created by varying the Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio. The size, shape, and
crystallinity of these particles were studied using SEM, XRD and FTIR. Results show that
different types of particles are synthesized by decreasing the Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio: spherical,
elliptical, star-forming and paired particles. However, if the ratio is lower than 1:1, amorphous
particles are formed. Size can be decreased 3x by adding an organic solvent and increasing
the reaction time. All samples comprise of vaterite and/or calcite particles, independent of the
reaction time, addition of organic solvent and Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio. However, hydromagnesite
particles are formed at a low reaction time (minutes), in the absence of an organic solvent,
and at a Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio of 1:1. Hydromagnesite particles are formed at a higher Ca2+:Mg2+
ratio, if the reaction time increases (to hours) and an organic solvent is added.
Next, hydrogel formation stimulated by the presence of the described above particles were
studied. The particles containing only calcium are not capable to cross-link GG due to a slow
release of Ca2+ ions, while particles containing either magnesium or both magnesium and
calcium are capable to cross-link GG. Our results show that gelation time increases if either
particle concentration increases or Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio decreases. Rheometry results showed
that the mechanical stiffness of the hydrogel increases with increasing particle concentration,
whereas at a specified particle concentration the mechanical stiffness increases with
decreasing the Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio. The influence of crystallographic structure of the particles
(vaterite, calcite, hydromagnesite, magnesian calcite, and amorphous) was studied for
hydrogels containing a specific type and concentration of particles: a) 4% particles with a
Mg2+ percentage of 50%, 66,6, and 100%, and b) 30% of particles with a Mg2+ percentage of
33,3 %. FTIR spectra showed the presence of calcite, but not vaterite, in all hydrogels.
However, only in the hydrogel consisting of 4 % particles with 100% magnesium,
hydromagnesite particles are found.
As a result of this work, micro-particles prepared with a Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio of 2:1 are preferred
as drug delivery system. These particles contain a higher particle concentration than
particles with a lower Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio, without changing gelation time significantly. The high
particle concentration is beneficial since more particles can be loaded than in hydrogels
prepared with less particles with a lower Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio having a comparable gelation time
and lower gel stifness. Since micro-particles induce gelation slower than nano-particles, they
are the preferred system to create injectable in-situ hydrogels. Another benefit is that they
have more preferable reaction conditions (low reaction time and no organic solvent). Future
research should focus on the optimization of drug delivery systems with micro-particles
having a Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio of 2:1. However, more characterizations should be done. First,
microCT and cell viability tests should be performed to study the particle aggregates and the
50 Enzyme co-loading into polymeric particles and capsules
University of Ghent
influence of hydrogels on cells. Further, the hydrogel properties have to be studied under
physiological conditions for their application as drug delivery system. Also influence the
loading capacity and enzyme activity have to studied.
51
References Ahmed, E. M. (2015). Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A
review. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(2), 105-121. doi:
10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006
Alruopn, P. L. (1977). Structural refinements of dolomite and a magnesian calcite and
implications for dolomite formation in the marine environment. American Mineralogist,
62, 772-783.
Andersen, F. A., & Brecevic, L. (1991). Infrared spectra of amorphous and crystalline
calcium carbonate. Acta Chem. Scand, 45(10), 1018-1024.
Bajaj, I. B., A., S., Survase, S. A., Saudagar, P. S., & Singhal, R. S. (2007). Gellan
Gum: Fermentative Production, Downstream Processing and Applications. Food
Technol. Biotechnol, 45(4), 341-354.
Baldursdóttir, S. G., & Kjøniksen, A.-L. (2005). Rheological characterization and
turbidity of riboflavin-photosensitized changes in alginate/GDL systems. European
Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 59(3), 501-510.
Barsoum, M., & Barsoum, M. (2002). Fundamentals of ceramics: CRC press.
Botha, A., & Strydom, C. A. (2003). DTA and FT-IR analysis of the rehydration of
basic magnesium carbonate. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 71(3),
987-996. doi: 10.1023/a:1023355016208
Burg, K. J. L., Porter, S., & Kellam, J. F. (2000). Biomaterial developments for bone
tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 21(23), 2347-2359. doi: Doi 10.1016/S0142-
9612(00)00102-2
Cacciotti, I. (2016). Cationic and Anionic Substitutions in Hydroxyapatite. Handbook
of Bioceramics and Biocomposites, 145-211.
Castiglioni, S., Cazzaniga, A., Albisetti, W., & Maier, J. A. M. (2013). Magnesium and
Osteoporosis: Current State of Knowledge and Future Research Directions. Nutrients,
5(8), 3022-3033. doi: 10.3390/nu5083022
Chen, Q., Zhu, C., & Thouas, G. A. (2012). Progress and challenges in biomaterials
used for bone tissue engineering: bioactive glasses and elastomeric composites.
Progress in Biomaterials, 1(1), 2. doi: 10.1186/2194-0517-1-2
Coutinho, D. F., Sant, S. V., Shin, H., Oliveira, J. T., Gomes, M. E., Neves, N. M., . . .
Reis, R. L. (2010). Modified Gellan Gum hydrogels with tunable physical and
mechanical properties. Biomaterials, 31(29), 7494-7502. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.035
Donatan, S., Yashchenok, A., Khan, N., Parakhonskiy, B., Cocquyt, M., Pinchasik, B.-
E., . . . Skirtach, A. (2016). Loading Capacity versus Enzyme Activity in Anisotropic
and Spherical Calcium Carbonate Microparticles. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces,
8(22), 14284-14292. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b03492
Douglas, T., Łapa, A., Reczyńska, K., Krok-Borkowicz, M., Pietryga, K., Samal, S., . .
. Van der Voort, P. (2016). Novel injectable, self-gelling hydrogel-microparticle
composites for bone regeneration consisting of gellan gum and calcium and
52
magnesium carbonate microparticles. Biomedical materials (Bristol, England), 11(6),
065011.
Douglas, T., Lapa, A., Samal, S. K., Declercq, H. A., Schaubroeck, D., Mendes, A. C.,
. . . Skirtach, A. G. Enzymatic, urease-mediated mineralization of gellan gum hydrogel
with calcium carbonate, magnesium-enriched calcium carbonate and magnesium
carbonate for bone regeneration applications. Frontiers in Bioengineering and
Biotechnology. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00370
Douglas, T. E., Pilarz, M., Lopez-Heredia, M., Brackman, G., Schaubroeck, D.,
Balcaen, L., . . . Pamula, E. (2015). Composites of gellan gum hydrogel enzymatically
mineralized with calcium-zinc phosphate for bone regeneration with antibacterial
activity. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. doi: 10.1002/term.2062
Douglas, T. E., Piwowarczyk, W., Pamula, E., Liskova, J., Schaubroeck, D.,
Leeuwenburgh, S. C., . . . Dubruel, P. (2014). Injectable self-gelling composites for
bone tissue engineering based on gellan gum hydrogel enriched with different
bioglasses. Biomedical Materials, 9(4), 045014. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/9/4/045014
Douglas, T. E., Wlodarczyk, M., Pamula, E., Declercq, H. A., de Mulder, E. L., Bucko,
M. M., . . . Leeuwenburgh, S. C. (2014). Enzymatic mineralization of gellan gum
hydrogel for bone tissue-engineering applications and its enhancement by
polydopamine. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 8(11), 906-918. doi: 10.1002/term.1616
Douglas, T. L. A., Aparicio, C. e., & Ginebra, M.-P. e. (2015). Biomimetic
mineralization of hydrogels: Cambridge.
Dupuis, T., Ducloux, J., Butel, P., & Nahon, D. (1984). Etude par spectrographie
infrarouge d’un encroute ment calcaire sous galet; mise en evidence et modelisation
experimentale d’une suite minerale evolutive a partir de carbonate de calcium amorphe. Clay Minerals, 19(4), 605-614.
Ferris, C. J., Gilmore, K. J., Wallace, G. G., & Panhuis, M. i. h. (2013). Modified gellan
gum hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Soft Matter, 9(14), 3705-3711. doi:
10.1039/C3SM27389J
Frost, R. L. (2011). Raman spectroscopic study of the magnesium carbonate mineral
hydromagnesite (Mg5 [(CO3) 4 (OH) 2]· 4H2O). Journal of Raman Spectroscopy,
42(8), 1690-1694.
Giammar, D. E., Bruant Jr, R. G., & Peters, C. A. (2005). Forsterite dissolution and
magnesite precipitation at conditions relevant for deep saline aquifer storage and
sequestration of carbon dioxide. Chemical Geology, 217(3–4), 257-276. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.12.013
Gkioni, K., Leeuwenburgh, S. C. G., Douglas, T. E. L., Mikos, A. G., & Jansen, J. A.
(2010). Mineralization of Hydrogels for Bone Regeneration. Tissue Engineering Part
B-Reviews, 16(6), 577-585. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0462
Gorodzha, S., Douglas, T. E., Samal, S. K., Detsch, R., Cholewa‐Kowalska, K.,
Braeckmans, K., . . . Baumbach, T. (2016). High‐resolution synchrotron X‐ray
analysis of bioglass‐enriched hydrogels. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Part A.
53
Grasdalen, H., & Smidsrød, O. (1987). Gelation of gellan gum. Carbohydrate
Polymers, 7(5), 371-393. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(87)90004-X
Habraken, W. J. E. M., Wolke, J. G. C., & Jansen, J. A. (2007). Ceramic composites
as matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering. Advanced Drug
Delivery Reviews, 59(4-5), 234-248. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.011
Hamidi, M., Azadi, A., & Rafiei, P. (2008). Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery.
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 60(15), 1638-1649. doi:
10.1016/j.addr.2008.08.002
Hänchen, M., Prigiobbe, V., Baciocchi, R., & Mazzotti, M. (2008). Precipitation in the
Mg-carbonate system—effects of temperature and CO2 pressure. Chemical
Engineering Science, 63(4), 1012-1028. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.052
Hoare, T. R., & Kohane, D. S. (2008). Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and
challenges. Polymer, 49(8), 1993-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027
Hoffman, A. S. (2012). Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug
Delivery Reviews, 64, 18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010
Kloprogge, J. T., Wharton, D., Hickey, L., & Frost, R. L. (2002). Infrared and Raman
study of interlayer anions CO32–, NO3–, SO42–and ClO4–in Mg/Al-hydrotalcite.
American Mineralogist, 87(5-6), 623-629.
Kuo, C. K., & Ma, P. X. (2001). Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds
for tissue engineering: Part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties.
Biomaterials, 22(6), 511-521.
Langer, R. (1990). New Methods of Drug Delivery. Science, 249(4976), 1527-1533.
doi: DOI 10.1126/science.2218494
Le Bail, A., Ouhenia, S., & Chateigner, D. (2011). Microtwinning hypothesis for a
more ordered vaterite model. Powder Diffraction, 26(01), 16-21.
Li, C., Sakata, Y., Arai, T., Domen, K., Maruya, K.-i., & Onishi, T. (1989). Adsorption
of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide on cerium oxide studied by Fourier-transform
infrared spectroscopy. Part 2.—Formation of formate species on partially reduced
CeO 2 at room temperature. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases, 85(6), 1451-1461.
Moreira, H. R., Munarin, F., Gentilini, R., Visai, L., Granja, P. L., Tanzi, M. C., &
Petrini, P. (2014). Injectable pectin hydrogels produced by internal gelation: pH
dependence of gelling and rheological properties. Carbohydrate Polymers, 103, 339-
347.
Oliveira, J. T., Martins, L., Picciochi, R., Malafaya, P. B., Sousa, R. A., Neves, N. M., .
. . Reis, R. L. (2010). Gellan gum A new biomaterial for cartilage tissue engineering
applications, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A Volume 93A, Issue 3.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 93A(3), 852-863. Retrieved from:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.32574/abstract
Paquette, J., & Reeder, R. J. (1990). Single-crystal X-ray structure refinements of two
biogenic magnesian calcite crystals. American Mineralogist, 75(9-10), 1151-1158.
54
Parakhonskiy, B., Zyuzin, M. V., Yashchenok, A., Carregal-Romero, S., Rejman, J.,
Möhwald, H., . . . Skirtach, A. G. (2015). The influence of the size and aspect ratio of
anisotropic, porous CaCO 3 particles on their uptake by cells. Journal of
nanobiotechnology, 13(1), 1.
Parakhonskiy, B. V., Foss, C., Carletti, E., Fedel, M., Haase, A., Motta, A., . . .
Antolini, R. (2013). Tailored intracellular delivery via a crystal phase transition in 400
nm vaterite particles. Biomaterials Science, 1(12), 1273-1281.
Parakhonskiy, B. V., Haase, A., & Antolini, R. (2012). Sub‐Micrometer Vaterite
Containers: Synthesis, Substance Loading, and Release. Angewandte Chemie
International Edition, 51(5), 1195-1197.
Parakhonskiy, B. V., Yashchenok, A. M., Donatan, S., Volodkin, D. V., Tessarolo, F.,
Antolini, R., . . . Skirtach, A. G. (2014). Macromolecule Loading into Spherical,
Elliptical, Star-Like and Cubic Calcium Carbonate Carriers. Chemphyschem, 15(13),
2817-2822. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201402136
Patel, A., & Mequanint, K. Hydrogel Biomaterials Y1 - 2011-08-01 N1 17653 UR
http://www.intechopen.com/books/export/citation/Zotero/biomedical-engineering-
frontiers-and-challenges/hydrogel-biomaterials ER.
Rahaman, M. N. (2014). 3 - Bioactive ceramics and glasses for tissue engineering
Tissue Engineering Using Ceramics and Polymers (Second Edition) (pp. 67-114):
Woodhead Publishing.
Sitepu, H. (2009). Texture and structural refinement using neutron diffraction data
from molybdite (MoO 3) and calcite (CaCO 3) powders and a Ni-rich Ni 50.7 Ti 49.30
alloy. Powder Diffraction, 24(04), 315-326.
Song, G. L. (2007). Control of biodegradation of biocompatable magnesium alloys.
Corrosion Science, 49(4), 1696-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.01.001
Strel’tsov, V. A., Tsirel’son, V. G., Ozerov, R. P., & Golovanov, O. A. (1987). Electronic and thermal properties of ions in CaF2: regularized least squares
treatment. Kristallografiya, 3, 90-97.
Suchanek, W. L., Byrappa, K., Shuk, P., Riman, R. E., Janas, V. F., & TenHuisen, K.
S. (2004). Preparation of magnesium-substituted hydroxyapatite powders by the
mechanochemical-hydrothermal method. Biomaterials, 25(19), 4647-4657. doi:
10.1016/biomaterials.2003.12.008
Svenskaya, Y., Gorin, D., Parakhonskiy, B., & Sukhorukov, G. (2015). Point-wise
laser effect on NIH/3T3 cells impregnated with photosensitizer-loaded porous calcium
carbonate microparticles. Paper presented at the Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO),
2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on.
Svenskaya, Y., Parakhonskiy, B., Haase, A., Atkin, V., Lukyanets, E., Gorin, D., &
Antolini, R. (2013). Anticancer drug delivery system based on calcium carbonate
particles loaded with a photosensitizer. Biophysical chemistry, 182, 11-15.
Svenskaya, Y. I., Fattah, H., Zakharevich, A. M., Gorin, D. A., Sukhorukov, G. B., &
Parakhonskiy, B. V. (2016). Ultrasonically assisted fabrication of vaterite submicron-
55
sized carriers. Advanced Powder Technology, 27(2), 618-624. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2016.02.014
Trushina, D. B., Sulyanov, S. N., Bukreeva, T. V., & Kovalchuk, M. V. (2015). Size
Control and Structure Features of Spherical Calcium Carbonate Particles.
Crystallography Reports, 60(4), 570-577. doi: 10.1134/S1063774515040227
Umbreit, M. H., & Jedrasiewicz, A. (2000). Application of infrared spectrophotometry
to the identification of inorganic substances in dosage forms of Antacida group. Acta
Pol Pharm, 57(2), 83-91.
Volodkin, D. (2014). CaCO3 templated micro-beads and -capsules for
bioapplications. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 207, 306-324. doi:
10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.001
Wang, X. P., Li, X., Ito, A., & Sogo, Y. (2011). Synthesis and characterization of
hierarchically macroporous and mesoporous CaO-MO-SiO2-P2O5 (M = Mg, Zn, Sr)
bioactive glass scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia, 7(10), 3638-3644. doi:
10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.029
Weaver, C. M., & Heaney, R. P. (2007). Calcium in human health: Springer Science &
Business Media.
White, W. B. (1971). Infrared characterization of water and hydroxyl ion in the basic
magnesium carbonate minerals. American Mineralogist, 56, 46-53.
Yu, L., & Ding, J. D. (2008). Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials.
Chemical Society Reviews, 37(8), 1473-1481. doi: 10.1039/b713009k
Zhang, Z., Zheng, Y., Ni, Y., Liu, Z., Chen, J., & Liang, X. (2006). Temperature- and
pH-Dependent Morphology and FT−IR Analysis of Magnesium Carbonate Hydrates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 110(26), 12969-12973. doi: 10.1021/jp061261j
Zhang, Z., Zheng, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, J., Liu, Z., & Liang, X. (2007).
Synthesis and shape evolution of monodisperse basic magnesium carbonate
microspheres. Crystal growth & design, 7(2), 337-342.
56
Attachments
Attachment 1: Statistics of yield
Overview of average yield and standard deviation per sample
Table 1: Overview of average yield and standard deviation for the synthesis of different samples.
Big Particles Small Particles
Sample Number Yield (%) SD Yield (%) SD
1 59,59 ± 9,56 48,55 ± 9,59
2 54,21 ± 13,90 59,49 ± 11,00
3 71,91 ± 16,70 47,95 ± 8,90
4 60,32 ± 13,11 62,07 ± 20,56
5 51,81 ± 10,87 54,89 ± 18,01
Comparison between big and small particles
Table 2: Normality test for average yield of each sample. Sample number represents the number and resp.
Ca:Mg Ratio in the sample. Part represents the type of particle, number 1: small particles and number 2: big particles. If the Significance is higher than 0,05; the yield distribution is normal. Here sample has a normal distribution of the yield, thus an ANOVA analysis is done to compare the samples with each other.
Tests of Normality
sample part
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
1,00 yield 1,00 ,159 7 ,200* ,951 7 ,736
2,00 ,256 6 ,200* ,903 6 ,394
2,00 yield 1,00 ,133 31 ,173 ,967 31 ,446
2,00 ,181 9 ,200* ,914 9 ,342
3,00 yield 1,00 ,151 11 ,200* ,971 11 ,899
2,00 ,303 6 ,090 ,832 6 ,111
4,00 yield 1,00 ,157 10 ,200* ,931 10 ,453
2,00 ,196 8 ,200* ,934 8 ,556
5,00 yield 1,00 ,220 10 ,186 ,901 10 ,227
2,00 ,139 8 ,200* ,980 8 ,963
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
57
Table 3: ANOVA test to compare the yield of the reactions between samples of big and small particles.
ANOVA
yield
sample Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1,00 Between Groups 394,196 1 394,196 4,299 ,062
Within Groups 1008,677 11 91,698
Total 1402,873 12
2,00 Between Groups 193,924 1 193,924 1,424 ,240
Within Groups 5176,639 38 136,227
Total 5370,564 39
3,00 Between Groups 2229,408 1 2229,408 15,293 ,001
Within Groups 2186,712 15 145,781
Total 4416,120 16
4,00 Between Groups 13,642 1 13,642 ,044 ,837
Within Groups 5007,006 16 312,938
Total 5020,648 17
5,00 Between Groups 42,244 1 42,244 ,180 ,677
Within Groups 3747,499 16 234,219
Total 3789,743 17
Comparison within groups
Table 4: Homogeity test shows that the variances witihin both groups are the same.
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
yield
part
Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
Small
Particles
2,473 4 64 ,053
Big
Particles
1,263 4 32 ,305
58
Table 5: ANOVA test to compare yield of each sample within the group of big and small particles. Analysis shows
that there is a difference between samples in the group of small particles (since Sig. <0,05). However, post-hoc analysis shows that there is no difference (Table 6, Attachment 1).
ANOVA
yield
part Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Small
Particles
Between Groups 1853,882 4 463,471 2,536 ,049
Within Groups 11698,298 64 182,786
Total 13552,180 68
Big
Particles
Between Groups 1635,341 4 408,835 2,410 ,070
Within Groups 5428,235 32 169,632
Total 7063,577 36
Table 6: Post-hoc tests to compare mean yield of each sample within the group of small particles. The test shows
that there is no difference between samples (Sig. >0,05) despite having a Sig. <0,05 for the ANOVA analysis.
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: yield
part (I) sample (J) sample
Mean
Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
1,00 Tukey
HSD
1,00 2,00 -10,93267 5,65761 ,311 -26,8140 4,9486
3,00 ,59571 6,53676 1,000 -17,7534 18,9448
4,00 -13,52629 6,66265 ,264 -32,2288 5,1762
5,00 -6,34229 6,66265 ,875 -25,0448 12,3602
2,00 1,00 10,93267 5,65761 ,311 -4,9486 26,8140
3,00 11,52839 4,74481 ,121 -1,7906 24,8474
4,00 -2,59361 4,91680 ,984 -16,3954 11,2082
5,00 4,59039 4,91680 ,883 -9,2114 18,3922
3,00 1,00 -,59571 6,53676 1,000 -18,9448 17,7534
2,00 -11,52839 4,74481 ,121 -24,8474 1,7906
4,00 -14,12200 5,90724 ,131 -30,7040 2,4600
5,00 -6,93800 5,90724 ,766 -23,5200 9,6440
4,00 1,00 13,52629 6,66265 ,264 -5,1762 32,2288
2,00 2,59361 4,91680 ,984 -11,2082 16,3954
3,00 14,12200 5,90724 ,131 -2,4600 30,7040
5,00 7,18400 6,04625 ,758 -9,7882 24,1562
5,00 1,00 6,34229 6,66265 ,875 -12,3602 25,0448
2,00 -4,59039 4,91680 ,883 -18,3922 9,2114
3,00 6,93800 5,90724 ,766 -9,6440 23,5200
4,00 -7,18400 6,04625 ,758 -24,1562 9,7882
60
Attachment 2: SEM Images
Big Particles
Magnification: 10.000x Magnification: 20.000x
Magnification:100.000x
Figure 3: SEM Images of sample 1, with magnifications of 10.000x, 20.000x and 100.000x.
61
Magnification: 5.000x Magnification: 20.000x
Magnification: 50.000x Magnification: 100.000 x
Figure 4: SEM Images of sample 2, with magnifications of 5.000x, 20.000x, 50.000x and 100.000x.
62
Magnification: 2.000x Magnification: 5.000x
Magnification: 20.000x
Figure 5: SEM Images of sample 3, with magnifications of 2.000x, 5.000x and 20.000x.
63
Magnification:1.000x Magnification: 5.000x
Magnification: 20.000x
Figure 6: SEM Images of sample 4, with magnifications of 1.000x, 5.000x and 20.000x.
64
Magnification: 2.000x Magnification: 10.000x
Figure 7: SEM Images of sample 5, with magnifications of 2.000x and 10.000x.
65
Small Particles
Magnification: 10.000x Magnification: 20.000x
Magnification: 50.000x Magnification: 100.000x
Figure 8: SEM Images of sample 1, with magnifications of 10.000x, 20.000x, 50.000x and 100.000x.
66
Magnification: 10.000x Magnification: 20.000x
Magnification: 100.000x
Figure 9: SEM Images of sample 2, with magnifications of 10.000x, 20.000x and 100.000x.
67
Magnification: 10.000x Magnification: 50.000x
Magnification: 100.000x
Figure 10: SEM Images of sample 3, with magnifications of 10.000x, 50.000x and 100.000x.
68
Magnification: 5.000x Magnification: 10.000x
Magnification: 30.000x Magnification: 50.000x
Figure 11: SEM Images of sample 4, with magnifications of 5.00x, 10.000x, 30.000x and 50.000x.
69
Magnification: 5.000x Magnification: 10.000x
Figure 12: SEM Images of sample 5, with magnifications of 5.00x and 10.000x.
70
Attachment 3: Gel formation
Before Gelation After Gelation
Big Particles
Small Particles
Figure 1: Images of the different samples particles before and after gelation.
Table 1: Overview of gelation for the different types of nano-particles, with a varying concentration.
Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5
Concentration
(%)
Time
(s)
Concentration
(%)
Time
(s)
Concentration
(%)
Time
(s)
Concentration
(%)
Time
(s)
30 1 4 1 4 1 4 1
25 3 2 1 2 1 2 1
20 10 0,2 5 0,2 5 0,2 5
0,1 0,1 70 0,1 40
Table 2: Overview of gelation for the different types of micro-particles, with a varying concentration.
Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5
Concentratio
n (%)
Time
(sec.)
Concentratio
n (%)
Time
(sec.)
Concentratio
n (%)
Time
(sec.)
Concentratio
n (%)
Time
(sec.)
30 1320 0,5 4620 0,1 3900 0,1 2340
25 3600 1 459 0,5 780 0,5 150
20 5700 2 140 1 245 1 113
16 10800 4 50 2 120 2 100
4 40 4 30
71
Attachment 4: Rheometry Data
Small Particles
Table 3: Overview of average Storage Modulus and average timre and standard deviation for each sample in the group of small particles.
S3 4% S4 4% S5 4% S5 2% S4 2% S2 30%
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD
20,44 0,09 2396 364,87 24,03 6,11 2408,67 188,33 41,55 0,21 3920,00 1079,88 34,48 6,04 2217,67 323,01 41,34 0,23 1165,33 68,01 31,14 0,20 3073,67 247,08
74,55 0,12 2506 365,57 74,56 0,07 2486,33 190,69 85,10 0,19 4152,33 1153,62 74,62 0,08 2294,33 317,86 85,01 0,14 1227,33 69,53 64,11 0,09 3077,67 234,89
134,50 0,12 2596 366,28 134,48 0,08 2552,67 191,47 141,55 6,16 4390,00 1234,80 134,50 0,06 2377,33 327,47 137,95 6,04 1286,33 68,01 127,53 6,01 3058,67 209,69
194,56 0,04 2670 366,99 194,52 0,14 2602,67 189,49 194,59 0,14 4570,67 1287,03 190,99 5,96 2447,00 334,83 194,54 0,18 1336,67 74,66 191,01 6,07 3025,67 198,11
254,47 0,12 2733 367,70 254,56 0,08 2647,33 191,27 254,62 0,01 4736,00 1343,17 251,02 6,03 2506,67 346,28 254,47 0,13 1384,33 75,70 251,14 6,07 2995,00 187,65
314,56 0,03 2790 368,40 314,55 0,09 2686,00 189,86 314,54 0,11 4889,00 1392,82 310,97 6,00 2557,67 357,34 314,49 0,16 1427,67 76,22 311,09 6,05 2963,33 183,75
374,44 0,11 2835 367,70 374,59 0,02 2716,67 192,79 374,60 0,06 5018,67 1433,37 370,95 5,98 2593,67 368,92 374,48 0,11 1464,00 76,74 371,03 5,99 2930,67 181,78
434,61 0,02 2879 364,87 434,61 0,08 2746,00 192,49 434,62 0,06 5128,67 1476,99 431,00 5,96 2639,67 384,59 434,45 0,09 1496,67 79,36 431,02 6,09 2898,00 182,20
494,50 0,21 2920 361,33 494,53 0,03 2771,00 193,46 494,61 0,03 5228,00 1509,03 491,03 6,03 2671,33 384,23 494,50 0,11 1527,00 79,88 491,10 6,10 2868,33 180,34
554,54 0,10 2959 359,92 551,07 6,04 2792,00 189,99 554,59 0,08 5322,67 1538,97 550,97 5,99 2704,67 393,68 554,49 0,06 1554,67 80,93 551,08 6,11 2839,33 183,91
614,56 0,14 2994 356,38 614,50 0,05 2814,67 192,26 614,59 0,02 5403,00 1567,11 610,96 6,04 2740,67 409,71 614,51 0,08 1581,00 81,46 614,51 0,01 2772,33 146,66
674,51 0,12 3023 349,31 671,08 6,02 2832,33 191,84 674,59 0,04 5481,00 1592,59 671,01 5,95 2762,33 405,94 674,46 0,10 1605,00 83,05 674,46 0,04 2753,33 159,79
734,48 0,00 3054 347,19 734,49 0,03 2851,33 192,80 734,58 0,06 5551,00 1618,65 731,06 6,00 2780,00 401,98 734,46 0,13 1628,67 84,11 731,03 6,02 2733,33 167,39
794,53 0,13 3086 345,07 791,05 6,11 2867,33 192,63 794,63 0,05 5614,67 1641,76 791,01 6,00 2798,00 397,09 794,50 0,15 1649,67 85,70 791,07 5,98 2713,00 180,03
854,57 0,16 3113 342,24 844,04 0,02 2879,67 193,46 851,10 6,09 5662,33 1668,42 851,05 6,04 2814,67 391,44 851,00 6,00 1669,33 85,17 850,98 5,96 2695,67 190,48
914,56 0,05 3141 337,29 911,01 6,04 2897,67 192,81 911,08 6,10 5712,67 1696,20 911,02 6,00 2829,67 386,36 911,00 6,03 1688,33 85,17 911,00 6,03 2677,33 199,66
974,51 0,06 3166 330,93 964,07 0,07 2908,33 191,68 974,63 0,06 5772,67 1718,28 967,58 6,03 2840,67 384,78 974,48 0,15 1705,67 87,31 971,13 6,07 2660,67 209,69
1029,25 7,42 3189 323,15 1027,57 6,09 2922,33 190,68 1034,63 0,06 5827,67 1740,41 1027,47 6,00 2856,67 382,44 1034,47 0,12 1723,00 87,84 1031,07 6,03 2645,00 218,00
1094,50 0,14 3217 319,61 1084,03 0,06 2934,33 189,93 1094,67 0,12 5876,00 1757,67 1087,57 6,09 2865,33 372,91 1091,10 6,06 1734,00 94,30 1091,03 6,00 2627,00 227,42
1149,30 7,35 3235 311,13 1144,07 0,06 2945,67 189,17 1154,63 0,12 5921,33 1774,87 1151,00 6,06 2879,33 368,58 1154,53 0,15 1751,00 92,68 1151,03 6,09 2613,67 235,12
72
Big Particles
Table 4: Overview of storage modulus and time measurements for each sample of big particles. Average time and storage modulus are calculated from three measurements
for each single sample.
B3 4% B4 4% B5 4% B5 2% B2 30%
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Time (s)
G' (Pa)
Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD
27,62 6,02 3.034,27 2.501,38 20,48 0,05 780,23 785,26 34,51 6,03 2.998,00 685,61 20,55 0,12 35,31 35,50 37,94 6,16 6.932,00 5.452,70
71,08 6,08 3.139,83 2.493,06 67,45 6,07 846,17 845,74 74,57 0,10 3.046,33 713,81 63,97 0,09 50,37 48,99 81,64 12,27 6.444,67 4.533,37
131,06 6,04 3.264,87 2.466,67 127,45 6,10 892,43 878,24 134,58 0,11 3.110,00 728,45 124,01 0,07 74,19 71,89 138,21 6,24 6.257,00 4.093,23
201,61 12,17 3.400,20 2.386,31 187,40 6,04 935,83 915,51 194,59 0,14 3.166,67 727,43 184,00 0,05 98,60 95,54 201,66 12,25 4.429,33 1.041,45
261,55 12,03 3.499,00 2.344,46 247,52 5,96 975,33 946,03 254,59 0,12 3.219,33 720,65 243,96 0,02 123,58 118,70 258,18 6,22 4.558,67 1.154,72
321,59 12,14 3.591,33 2.296,75 307,42 6,03 1.007,90 972,40 314,48 0,14 3.272,33 700,50 304,03 0,08 149,51 142,94 307,62 6,25 4.591,33 1.161,85
381,62 12,12 3.679,33 2.245,10 367,49 6,10 1.040,43 993,38 374,60 0,09 3.321,00 689,61 363,98 0,04 175,52 168,02 371,10 6,05 4.567,33 1.103,50
441,65 12,16 3.760,67 2.192,37 427,46 6,01 1.066,07 1.015,04 434,55 0,05 3.369,00 666,58 423,98 0,04 200,82 193,29 431,04 5,97 4.539,67 1.099,34
501,59 12,14 3.783,67 2.077,84 487,43 6,03 1.091,63 1.030,39 494,52 0,15 3.411,33 643,45 484,02 0,08 225,61 218,47 491,03 6,07 4.537,67 1.062,08
561,66 12,27 3.870,33 2.036,84 547,44 6,03 1.117,37 1.045,95 554,53 0,09 3.455,33 621,43 543,96 0,03 249,03 241,94 554,57 10,49 4.556,00 1.064,44
618,19 6,08 3.935,67 1.999,19 607,52 5,98 1.139,77 1.056,72 610,96 6,02 3.493,00 595,46 603,98 0,07 273,19 266,76 614,57 10,40 4.557,67 1.051,99
678,13 6,06 4.017,00 1.955,88 667,47 6,11 1.161,67 1.066,29 671,09 5,98 3.532,67 570,99 674,52 18,13 306,01 306,09 667,60 6,21 4.582,67 1.067,45
738,18 6,05 4.083,33 1.903,71 727,45 5,98 1.182,93 1.077,25 730,99 6,03 3.566,67 553,41 730,93 12,01 325,88 326,18 731,09 6,10 4.613,67 1.091,45
798,22 6,18 4.149,00 1.855,63 784,03 0,05 1.195,47 1.087,64 794,49 0,03 3.605,67 541,32 790,97 12,10 343,82 342,60 794,75 10,67 4.621,00 1.088,23
854,72 0,10 4.209,67 1.826,78 847,51 6,06 1.214,63 1.093,19 847,58 6,14 3.642,67 524,71 850,96 12,05 366,38 367,12 851,09 6,11 4.629,33 1.085,13
911,09 6,08 4.265,00 1.776,16 907,49 5,98 1.231,77 1.099,26 907,59 6,01 3.677,67 508,71 910,97 12,02 388,34 391,53 911,00 6,05 4.645,67 1.101,09
974,63 0,21 4.326,33 1.730,35 967,51 6,02 1.247,83 1.104,33 971,11 6,06 3.711,00 493,08 967,49 6,09 407,00 410,74 971,10 6,13 4.665,00 1.110,83
1.034,67 0,06 4.382,00 1.683,99 1.027,47 6,18 1.264,57 1.110,01 1.027,57 6,09 3.732,67 481,87 1.030,93 12,01 430,48 438,25 1.027,63 5,95 4.643,33 1.149,63
1.091,17 6,12 4.432,33 1.630,33 1.087,57 6,00 1.280,03 1.114,76 1.087,57 6,09 3.760,33 473,00 1.087,47 6,00 448,67 457,77 1.091,07 6,12 4.627,33 1.123,72
1.147,60 6,15 4.480,00 1.585,24 1.147,50 6,06 1.295,00 1.118,48 1.151,03 6,00 3.792,00 462,45 1.147,50 6,06 467,23 478,41 1.154,57 0,06 4.626,00 1.110,72
73
Statistic analysis
Table 3: Results from ANOVA for the group of big particles, this shows that only the hydrogels containing
particles from samples 3 and 5 with a particle concentration of 4% don’t show a significant difference in hydrogel strength..
Storage Modulusa
Sample +
Particle
Concentration N
Subset
1 2 3 4
Tukey
HSDb,c
5 2% 60 256,9767
4 4% 60 1098,3533
5 4% 60 3444,1833
3 4% 60 3865,1917
2 30% 60 4881,2667
Sig. 1,000 1,000 ,488 1,000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2033721,980.a
a. partgroup = Big Particles
b. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 60,000.
c. Alpha = ,05.
Table 4: Results from ANOVA for the group of small particles, this shows that the hydrogels containing particles
from samples 2,3,4 and 5 with a particle concentration of 30% and 4% don’t show a significant difference in hydrogel strength..
lossmodulusa
parttype N
Subset
1 2 3
Tukey HSDb,c
4 2% 60 1530,2833
5 2% 60 2719,8500
4 4% 60 2763,1500
2 30% 60 2831,0833
3 4% 60 2865,3167
5 4% 60 5208,9167
Sig. 1,000 ,844 1,000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 451901,283.a
a. partgroup = Small Particles
b. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 60,000.
c. Alpha = ,05.