Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

37
Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005

Transcript of Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Page 2: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Part 1: Health Consequence ofNuclear Hazards

Page 3: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Isotopes thatcontribute tothe activityof nuclear

waste

Page 4: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

• Ten years after removal from a reactor, the surface dose rate for a typical spent fuel assembly exceeds 100 Sv/hour

• Fatal dose is about 10 Sv, so exposure for a few minutes would be fatal

• Fuel rod activity would decay to roughly 0.1 Sv/hour after 10,000 years, so a few days of exposure would be fatal.

Page 5: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Biologically-active nuclides

Especially dangerous because they can be incorporated into body tissues and therefore expose the body to radiation over many years

Page 6: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Iodine

• I129 (half life of 15.7 million years)

• I131 (half life of 8 days)

– Iodine is soluable in water– Iodine used by thyroid gland– can cause Thyroid cancer– Iodine pills taken to dilute radioactive uptake

Page 7: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Strontium

• Sr90 (half life of 28 years)

– Strontium is concentrated in bones, because it is chemically similar to calcium

– Concentrated in food chain (e.g. cows eat grass contaminated with Sr90, and then people drink the cow’s milk

Page 8: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Cesium

• Cs134 (half life of 2.1 years)

• Cs137 (half life of 30 years)

– Rapidly absorbed and distributed throughout body

– Rapidly excreted from body

– Some tendency to be concentrated in muscles

Page 9: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Chernobyl Accident, April 25, 1986

Page 10: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Power reactor fire/meltdown caused by scandalously improper testing, although the design wasn’t the greatest, either.

Graphic moderator caught fire, and reactor core melted down.

No containment vessel, so atmospheric release occurred

Page 11: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.
Page 12: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Concretecontainmentheroicallybuilt aroundreactor afteraccident

Page 13: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.
Page 14: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Chernobyl release

• The main radionuclides in the cloud were:

• 131I (half-life = 8.1 days)

• 134Cs (half-life = 2.1 years)

• 137Cs (half-life = 30.2 years).

Page 15: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.
Page 16: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Deaths through 2005:

50 acute radiation poisoning deaths

9 thyroid cancer deaths, out of a total of about 4000 cases (high cure rate).

4000 possible cancer deaths in long term

among the 600,000 emergency workers and local residents exposed to high radiation. This amounts to a 3% increase in cancer death rate.

Page 17: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Military Usage

Page 18: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombs• Hiroshima

– U235 bomb, 15 kT yield– 64,000 deaths in population of 250,000

• Nagasaki, 21 kT yield– Pu239 bomb– 39,000 deaths in population of 174,000

• Deaths– Most initial deaths due to blast, heat radiation– Radiation deaths mostly within 1 km of blast– Subsequently 400 cancer deaths over next 30 years– Some detectable Ce137 contamination of soil

Page 19: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Typical yield 250 kT

Page 20: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.
Page 21: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Is “fallout” (radioactive particulates) an unintended consequence of nuclear explosions?

Page 22: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Radionuclides in Fallout

• Pu239 (24,000 yrs)

• I131 (8 days)

• Ce137 (30 years)

• C14 (5,730 years)

• Sr90 (29 years)

Page 23: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Part 2: Nuclear Waste Disposal

Page 24: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Disposal

Whatare these ?

Page 25: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Disposal

SegmentsOfSubmarinesContainingReactorsAtHanford

Page 26: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Yucca Mountain

ControversialAndUnopenedWasteStorageFacility inNevada

Page 27: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Design goal

To continually isolate nuclear waste and protect people and the environment for at least 10,000 years

Page 28: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Design of tunnel

Note: invert = platform

Page 29: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.
Page 30: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Natural Hazards

Water table rise, especially if climate becomes wetter

Volcanic eruptions

Earthquakes

Page 31: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Anthropogenic Hazards

Terrorism

Warfare, intentionally bombing the site

Incidental human intrusion, e.g. drilling for ground water, mining

Purposeful human intrusion, to recover nuclear materials

Page 32: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Some of these hazardsare more amenable to

probabilistic analysis than others

Page 33: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Earthquakes

TSPA-SR Modelwith 1 Chance in10,000 of beingExceededEach Year

Used as a basisFor designingShaking-resistantcontainment

Page 34: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Climate Change• Wetter climate increase the chance of transport

of radionuclides by ground water.

• Current rainfall now 190 mm/yr, but was as high as 430 mm/yr during the glacial period.

• What is chance of major climate change in next 10,000 years? Can appeal to Pleistocene history, but what is the certainty.

Page 35: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Human Intervention• What will humans be doing 500 years from

now?

• Can compute the probability that someone unaware of the repository and drilling for water might accidentally breach a cannister, but the chances of humans drilling is less certain.

• What about mining of radionuclides for heat or weapons? Consider the following …

Page 36: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.

Lia, Georgia, Accident, 2001

• Three shepherds found a several canisters in the mountains that appeared to have melted nearby snow. They carried them back to their camp, to use them for warmth. They all developed severe radiation poisoning, e.g. lesion on their backs.

• The canisters contained Sr90 from an old Soviet thermoelectric generator dating from the cold war. The men received does of about 4 Sv. They survived, being treated 3 months in the hospital.

Page 37: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.