ENR Top 400 Contracters

8/8/2019 ENR Top 400 Contracters

1/39

The Top 400 Contractors

May 17, 2010

ENR's 2010 Top 400 Contractors ranks the 400 largest General Contractors by 2008revenue. This is a comprehensive package of data and analysis that contains theprevious year's rankings and percentage of revenue by market. The list also ranks thelargest firms in a wide variety of market sectors as described below. There is also astatistical summary of the 2010 Top 400 "at a Glance" by markets and regions.Companies are ranked by construction revenue in 2009 in $ millions.

Bonus Addition: This electronic edition of the Top 400 Contractors includes two

supplements. "Subsidiaries By Rank" includes in-depth listings of each firm'ssubsidiaries and "Where the 2010 ENR Top 400 Contractors Worked - by Country" liststhe countries in which these firms had work or offices in that country during 2009

The ENR Top 400 Contractors listing includes the following information *:Rank (1-400) in years 2010 and 2009, Firm Name, City, State, 2009 Total Revenue(total and international), New Contracts ($), Markets (% of 2009 Revenue): GeneralBuilding, Manufacturing, Power, Water/Sewer Waste, Industrial/Petro., Transportation,Hazardous Waste, Telecommunications, CM-AT-RISK % of Revenue. This edition alsoincludes an alphabetical index of the Top 400 Contractors.* Company telephone numbers and email addresses are not included in The ENR Top400 Contractors listing.

Included in this issue are rankings in different market sectors: The Top 20 Hazardous WasteThe Top 20 Industrial Process/PetroleumThe Top 20 PowerThe Top 20 TransportationThe Top 20 TelecommunicationsThe Top 100 Contractors by New ContractsThe Top 50 in Domestic General Building RevenueThe Top 50 Domestic Heavy ContractorsThe Top 50 Contractors Working Abroad

Bar charts: General Building Takes a Major HitEurope/Middle east Markets Sag in the DownturnPetroleum Continues to Lead Among International Markerts


2/39

50 ENR May 17, 2010 enr.com

For the past year, construction rms have been searching

or signs that the recession, which began over two yearsago, was abating. Those signs continue to be ew and arbetween. So the largest U.S. contractors now are settlinginto a waiting game, scrambling to increase their market

shares, moving into new markets and taking a good look at howstructure and Heery International. This year, the three companies revenue hasbeen combined under the parent, Bal ourBeatty US.

Unlike among the large design rms,

there are ewer mergers and acquisitionsamong the large contractors. However,there are a ew exceptions. In November,Primoris Corp. acquired Baton Rouge-based heavy contractor James Construc-tion Group or $135 million in cash andstock. James, which had been a liated with Warren, Mich.-based Angelo Ia rateConstruction, had $410 million in reve-nue in 2008, according to Primoris.

Insitu orm Technologies is anothercontractor that has been active. In 2009,it acquired the Bayou Cos., a New Iberia,La.-based contractor specializing in on-shore and o shore oil-and-gas pipe coat-ing and lining, ollowed by its acquisitiono Corrpro Cos., a Houston-based corro-sion protection and pipeline maintenancecontractor. We ound we had a steady but limited growth potential in the mu-nicipal [cured-in-place pipe] market, says

they do business to make sure that, whenthe market does rebound, they are ready.

The depth o the downturn can beseen in the survey data supplied by theENR Top 400 Contractors. The Top 400,

as a group, generated $290.63 billion inrevenue in 2009, down 14.1%, rom$338.38 billion, in 2008. While interna-tional contracting revenue ell only 2.5%,to $55.58 billion, or the group in 2009,domestic contracting revenue was o by 16.5%, to $235.05 billion.

The allo in revenue was not limitedto a ew large rms. O the 374 contrac-tors on this years Top 400 that also sentin surveys last year, 291 su ered decliningrevenue, while only 80 had revenue in-creases. O last years Top 100, nine con-tractors saw revenue increases, 88 hadlower revenue, and three did not partici-pate in the survey.

In some cases, the revenue increasesthis year were not organic. For example,in 2009, three Bal our Beatty subsidiaries were ranked on the Top 400: Bal our Be-atty Construction, Bal our Beatty In ra-

John Huhn, Insitu orms director o cor-porate development. He says the acquisi-tion o Bayou and Corrpro gives the rma major presence in the energy and min-ing sectors. These acquisitions allow usto play in the private-sector markets.

More recently, Anderson Cos. ac-quired Birmingham, Ala.-based BriceBuilding Co. While we do some work inthe health-care market, they have a lot o health-care work, which helps us, says Tom Baird, vice president or gaming andhospitality or Roy Anderson Construc-

tion. He also notes that Brice has a bigpresence in the New Orleans market, ex-tending Andersons geographic reach.

Building Bust While most domestic markets su eredthis past year, the general building market was the big loser, o by more than $35billion in 2008 revenue rom U.S.-basedprojects to $129.61 billion in 2009.

The depth o the general buildingmarket downturn can be seen in the data

rom Turner Construction. Our marketspeaked in 2007, when we estimated theoverall potential size o the markets weare in at $240 billion. That number has

allen to $160 billion in 2009 and 2010,says Nick Makes, senior vice president.

Makes says that, while Turners reve-nue has allen o and its employee countis down 15% rom its peak, the rm con-

B G r J. T z

[TOP 400 cOnTracTOrs ]O

p h

O t

O c

O u r t e

s y

O f b e

c h t e l


3/39

enr.com May 17, 2010 ENR 51

tinues to seek out talented young people.We hired 230 college graduates last year. We do not want to stray rom our policy o keeping the talent pipeline open,

Makes says. In addition, because many ewer contractors are actively recruitingin a down market, Turner had its pick o top students, he adds.

For many rms, the boom years provided a substantial cushion going into therecession. We were ortunate that we went into 2008 with a record backlog, so2009 was a record year or us, says Shaun Yancey, senior vice president at PCL. But,he says, looking out rom here, times aregoing to be tougher. Most contractorshad seen their backlogs shrink by 30%, i

not more, and we are de nitely complet-ing jobs aster than we are able to acquirenew work, adds Baird.

Most contractors have elt the impacto the recession, particularly those work-ing primarily in the private-sector com-mercial markets. We saw $3 billion inbacklog stop overnight, says Andy Ball,

CEO o Webcor Builders, where projects were put on hold.

But Webcor has ound some major wins in the public market, including the

277,000-sq- t San Francisco Public Util-ities Commission building, the San Fran-cisco General Hospital and phase one o the $4-billion Transbay Transit Center inSan Francisco, which just received ederal

unding. We have learned not to be soreliant on the private sector, Ball says.

Diversi cation has helped many majorcontractors. Our civil unit has been grow-ing and has never been better, says Mike McNally, CEO o Skanska USA. But, heconcedes, the building side o Skanska hasbeen o by about 10%. We have a lot o

work in health care, education and datacenters but were never big in residential,he says. On the retail and commercial side,theres no pulse at all, he says.

Fluor also has been helped by being innumerous markets. Our diversity in mar-kets and geography has helped keep usbusy, says David Seaton, COO o Fluor

Corp. He says the rm has worked hardto ensure the skills among its sta aretransportable among markets, keepingeveryone active and productive.

Time for ReflectionSome contractors reacted early to the re-cession. Everybody saw this coming. Itis the advantage o being a trailing indi-catoro being a ew cars back on thetrain when the crash comes, says BartEberwein, vice president o Ho manCorp. The only thing rms didnt counton is the length and depth o the reces-sion. We are all hunkering down and tak-ing care o our clients, he says.

Bechtel Group is using the recession

to examine its business model. We cameinto the recession better o than wehoped, but we intend to come out o therecession better o than we are now, saysBill Dudley, president. We became com-placent in good times, he says, but thecompany now is examining whether newmarkets will bolster its business once the

The 2009 Top 400 aT a Glance

VolumeDOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL TOTAL

$ BIL. % CHG. $ BIL. % CHG. $ BIL. % CHG.

ReVenue 235.1 -16.5 55.6 -2.5 290.6 -14.1neW conTRacT 222.7 -11.6 60.9 38.5 283.6 -4.2

pRoFiTaBiliTyNUMBER OF FIRMS REPORTING AVERAGE %

PROFIT LOSS PROFIT LOSSDomeSTic 340 17 4.8 NA inTeRnaTional 52 22 8.9 NA

pRoFeSSional STaFFNUMBER OF FIRMS REPORTING AVERAGE %

DOMESTIC INTL. DOMESTIC INTL.incReaSe 51 10 10.3 13.3DecReaSe 197 24 15.4 16.1

Same 128 112 NA NA

BackloGNUMBER OF FIRMS REPORTING AVERAGE %

hiGheR 67 30.2loWeR 253 32.3Same 53 NA

maRkeT analySiSREVENUE PERCENT

TYPE OF WORK $ MIL. OF TOTALBuilDinG 136,193.3 46.9manuFacTuRinG 4,929.7 1.7inDuSTRial 16,356.3 5.6peTRoleum 46,851.9 16.1WaTeR 4,924.8 1.7SeWeR WaSTe 6,432.4 2.2TRanSpoRTaTion 38,083.9 13.1haZaRDouS WaSTe 3,903.8 1.3poWeR 25,327.6 8.7TelecommunicaTionS 4,028.4 1.4oTheR 3,599.8 1.2

inTeRnaTional ReGionSNUMBER REVENUE PERCENTOF FIRMS $ MIL. OF TOTAL

canaDa 41 14,665.1 26.4laTin ameRica 27 2,724.7 4.9caRiBBean iSlanDS 19 901.2 1.6euRope 25 8,008.2 14.4miDDle eaST 26 15,134.4 27.2aSia/auSTRalia 25 9,715.2 17.5aFRica 13 4,427.1 8.0aRcTic/anTaRcTic 1 1.2 0.0


4/39


market turns around.For the Weitz Co., the recession has

provided the opportunity to re ocus itsoperations. We have held our own andcontinue to be pro itable, but we havetaken a look at our operations, says KevinKlustner, chie revenue o cer. He saysthe rm always treated its branch o cesas independent operations, but now it ismoving to leverage each o ces strengthsand expertise across company lines to sup-port national clients.

With the domestic market downturn,many U.S. contractors are going overseas

or opportunities. We are looking abroad

at those areas where we can o er some-thing unique and provide value to cus-tomers, says Makes o Turner. He alsosays Turner is taking advantage o joint ventures with closely allied companies tomove abroad. For example, Turners par-ent company, German-based Hochtie ,recently acquired Flatiron Construction, which Turner is joint-venturing withthroughout the Midwest and west. Weare now exploring opportunities withthem in Canada, Makes says. Turner alsois teaming with Canadian AECON, which

used to be owned by Hochtie , or urtheropportunities in Canada. ValleyCrest is another irm that i s

moving ar a ield. The irm has estab-lished itsel in the Middle East and re-cently entered into a joint-venture part-nership with Al Ain Wildli e Park andResort in Abu Dhabi. Al Ain is designed

to be the largest zoological/botanical park in the world, says Tom Donnelly, presi-

dent o ValleyCrest Landscape Develop-ment. It is planned to be a destinationresort centered on wildli e in the desert,he says.

Some rms are looking at long-termprospects. In the U.S., you are not goingto build powerplants unless the demandis there, says Jim Bernhard, CEO o TheShaw Group. However, he says Shaw is working on 10 nuclear projects aroundthe world and is optimistic about domes-tic prospects going orward. Utilitiesdont plan or just the next 12 months.

Right now, they have more con dence inincreasing capacity over the next 30 yearsthan I have seen in a while, he says.

Some rms did manage to hold theirown because o the markets they serve.One was Herzog Contracting Corp., which has a heavy presence in the Class I

reight-rail market. The Class I lineshave cut back, but most o their cuts wereon the rolling stock side, rather than online engineering, says Al Landes, presi-dent o Herzog. He notes that Herzogbegan decades ago as a paving contractor.

But, he says, revenue short alls or localagencies and governments have put astrain on that market. I am glad highwaysare the smallest part o our business.

Moving Into New Markets Many contractors are moving into newmarkets that were not their primary ocus

in the past. For example, Turner is mov-ing more aggressively into the ederalmarket. Years ago, we only had three or

our o our o ces with a lot o ederalproject experience. We now have 15 o -

ces doing ederal work, says Makes. Hesays Turner now has a major training pro-gram in ederal procurement proceduresand regulations.

One o the problems with entering newmarkets is the learning curve and client so-phistication. Everybody is chasing govern-ment work because that is where the marketis, says Eberwein. He says that i a rmhasnt worked or agencies like the ederalGeneral Services Administration, the Vet-erans Administration or the U.S. PostalService or done work very similar to whatthe project entails, that rm isnt going tobe short-listed. When you have 25 bidders

or a VA hospital and 10 have worked on VA hospitals, those 10 are [on] the shortlist.

Contractors are having a tough timebreaking into some markets. Competi-tion is tough, but we are well-positioned with a long port olio in the health-caremarket, says Robin Savage, COO o Robins & Morton. He says many contrac-tors are trying to jump into that market.But health-care clients still are short-listing based on experience. They are

more astute and sophisticated than a loto other types o clients, he says.Owners with money are quick to take

advantage o the competition. Clients arein the drivers seat in this market and are willing to hold your eet to the ire onprices, says Klustner. But, he warns, toomuch emphasis on price could cause prob-lems or owners as many contractors arebidding below cost just to keep their peo-ple working, risking ailure not just o theproject but the company.

The national recession also is causing

some interesting competitive challenges.Local clients are under increasing pres-sure to hire local rms to bolster the localeconomy. The emphasis on using localpeople has ueled a lot o our joint ven-tures, says Savage. So Robins & Mortonis joint-venturing with smaller, local rmsto provide size and expertise while ensur-


50.2

10 20 30 40 50

Building 46.919.8

21.7

11.313.1

7.78.7

3.3

1.71.7

1.31.72.02.2

1.31.3

1.21.4

1.2

Industrial/Petroleum

Manufacturing

WaterSewer

Transportation

Hazardous Waste

Power

Telecom

Other

GENERAL BUILDING TAKES A MAJOR HIT

2008 2009

2009 Total Revenue$290.63 billion

Market as % revenue


5/39


6/39


will be gradual, making the threat o infa-tion serious but limited.

It is getting tougher or contractors toprotect themselves against price spikes.Back in 2006, we could negotiate priceescalators in our contracts, says Savage.But we are nding we have a hard timeselling those clauses in this market.

For Bechtel, price escalation is one o the biggest worries. We are giving xed-price estimates on jobs that wont nish

or our to six years, says Dudley. He saysBechtel is nancially strong, but it takesevery precaution to mitigate the risks, in-cluding waiting until the project breaksground to x prices and pre-ordering ma-terials and equipment.

Baird believes that international ac-tors could a ect costs. We are seeing

pressure on steel prices, not because o demand but rom a perceived weakness o the dollar. He says the high de cits o theU.S. and other governments raise thespecter o infation.

The current international inancialturmoil also has some contractors wor-ried. Our biggest concern is how the cur-rent sovereign debt crisis will a ect theeconomy and the markets, says Bern-hard. He is concerned a de ault by Greecemay set o a chain reaction in other coun-tries. I just hope it doesnt go the way the

banking crisis went a couple years ago.Walking the Tightrope The recession is taking its toll on many contractors around the country. Landeso Herzog worries the recession, i it con-tinues or a long period, will cause evengood rms to ail. Ive been in this busi-ness or 39 years and seen that recessionsusually will take out the weak and poorly run competitors. This is the rst time Ihave seen good-sized, well-run companiesgetting into trouble, he says.

There are a lot o contractors that arestill holding on, but i the recession con-tinues, there will be an acceleration in

ailures, says Baird. Ball o Webcor hasseen a lot o erce and even righteningcompetition. We have been second orthird in bidding on a lot o projects wherethe winning bid was ar below what we

w

1 uRS coRp. 29,604.0

2 BEchtEl 19,312.0

3 FluoR coRp. 18,500.0

4 KBR 12,961.4

5 KIEwIt coRp. 11,713.2

6 JacoBS 10,000.0

7 thE Shaw GRoup INc. 7,721.5

8 thE tuRNER coRp. 6,618.2

9 SKaNSKa uSa 6,127.5

10 cB&I 5,442.0

11 GIlBaNE BuIldING co. 3,907.3

12 thE walSh GRoup ltd. 3,689.1

13 mcdERmott INtERNatIoNal INc. 3,626.2

14 FoStER whEElER aG 3,481.7

15 claRK GRoup 3,479.5

16 pcl coNStRuctIoN ENtERpRISES INc. 3,414.0

17 thE whItING-tuRNER coNtRactING co. 3,161.0

18 mccaRthy holdINGS INc. 2,920.0

19 SlcE aRchItEctS llp 2,900.0

20 tutoR pERINI coRp. 2,786.3

21 BalFouR BEatty uS 2,544.6

22 JE duNN coNStRuctIoN GRoup 2,482.5

23 hENSEl phElpS coNStRuctIoN co. 2,267.7

24 BlacK & vEatch 2,259.4

25 paRSoNS 2,190.9

26 moRtENSoN coNStRuctIoN 2,127.4

27 BRaSFIEld & GoRRIE llc 1,843.9

28 StRuctuRE toNE 1,713.0

29 BaRtoN malow co. 1,553.7

30 holdER coNStRuctIoN co. 1,471.0

31 GRaNItE coNStRuctIoN INc. 1,457.032 dpR coNStRuctIoN INc. 1,450.0

33 BovIS lENd lEaSE 1,376.2

34 maNhattaN coNStRuctIoN GRoup 1,369.0

35 auStIN INduStRIES 1,266.7

36 SuFFolK coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 1,228.0

37 FlatIRoN coNStRuctIoN coRp. 1,219.0

38 thE FlINtco coS. INc. 1,200.0

39 huNt coNStRuctIoN GRoup INc. 1,124.0

40 mIchElS coRp. 1,116.5

41 wIllBRoS GRoup INc. 1,084.3

42 walBRIdGE 1,020.0

43 tRayloR BRoS. INc. 1,016.0

44 pEppER coNStRuctIoN GRoup 995.5

45 SuNdt coNStRuctIoN INc. 967.646 vallEycRESt laNdScapE coS. 937.0

47 layNE chRIStENSEN co. 931.5

48 m+w u.S. 928.2

49 SwINERtoN INc. 916.5

50 thE laNE coNStRuctIoN coRp. 835.9

51 pRImoRIS coRp. 830.0

52 alBERIcI coRp. 826.0

53 INSItuFoRm tEchNoloGIES INc. 777.3

54 clayco INc. 760.0

55 thE wEItZ co. 759.1

56 hoaR coNStRuctIoN llc 755.6

57 ch2m hIll 736.4

58 thE laytoN coS. 703.0

59 adolFSoN & pEtERSoN coNStRuctIoN 697.7

60 thE yatES coS. INc. 691.9

61 matRIx SERvIcE co. 636.1

62 lEchaSE coNStRuctIoN SERvIcES llc 625.4

63 toRcoN INc. 618.0

64 wEEKS maRINE INc. 611.0

65 hathaway dINwIddIE coNStRuctIoN 590.6

66 KItchEll coRp. 576.2

67 powER coNStRuctIoN co. llc 556.0

68 mIRoN coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 555.1

69 chaNEN coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 533.0

70 huNtER RoBERtS coNStRuctIoN GRoup 521.9

71 hItt coNtRactING INc. 520.3

72 GREat laKES dREdGE & docK coRp. llc 517.6

73 KINSlEy coNStRuctIoN INc. 516.2

74 hawaIIaN dREdGING coNStRuctIoN co. 514.1

75 thE howaRd S. wRIGht coS. 512.0

76 pERFoRmaNcE coNtRactoRS INc. 510.0

77 B.l. haRBERt INtERNatIoNal llc 508.5

78 amERIcaN INFRaStRuctuRE 507.1

79 FoRREStER coNStRuctIoN co. 500.0

80 coRE coNStRuctIoN GRoup 499.0

81 amES coNStRuctIoN INc. 498.182 lpcImINEllI INc. 497.2

83 RoBINS & moRtoN 482.0

84 SattERFIEld & poNtIKES coNStRuctIoN 480.0

85 S&B ENGINEERS aNd coNStRuctoRS ltd. 474.0

86 thE KoKoSING GRoup 464.1

87 oNEIl INduStRIES INc. 460.8

88 SEllEN coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 460.0

89 vcc 460.0

90 cdm 459.0

91 cRoSSlaNd coNStRuctIoN co. 451.2

92 wIllIamS BRothERS coNStRuctIoN co. 451.1

93 haRpER coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 448.0

94 NaBholZ coNStRuctIoN coRp. 445.0

95 w.w. wEBBER llc 443.096 FaGEN INc. 439.8

97 coNSIGlI coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 437.9

98 JoSEph JINGolI & SoN INc. 437.5

99 claNcy & thEyS coNStRuctIoN co. 435.1

100 w.m. JoRdaN co. INc. 431.0

The Top 100 conTRacToRS By neW conTRacTS* 2009 2009RaNK FIRm coNtRactS RaNK FIRm coNtRactS

*AmOng tOp 400 firms prOviding dAtA; =in $ mil.



7/39


considered break-even. Being second inthose cases is not a bad place to be.

Many contractors are wary o nan-cially suspect contractors and subs. This year and the rst hal o 2011 could be atough time or less-well-managed con-tractors and subs, says Savage o Robins& Morton. He notes that Birmingham, Ala.-based general contractor McCrory Building Co. shut down early this year.That is the only major contractor ailureIve seen so ar, he says. Savage says Rob-ins & Morton has increased its level o scrutiny in prequali ying subcontractorsto make sure they are sound.

Owners are beginning to take precau-tions. We are seeing a greater percentageo jobs requiring bonding, says Makes o Turner. He says part o this is because the

government market, which traditionally requires some sort o surety bonds, nowis making up a larger percentage o build-ings work. But there is a growing num-

The data-center market still showssigns o li e. Banks, hospitals and insur-ance companies, among others, continueto need an electronic in rastructure, so themarket continues to be active, says Eber- wein. This sector is not overbuilt the way the semiconductor ab market got 10 to15 years ago. There is a de nite need ordata centers now.

One o the biggest jobs in the o ng isa data center: the $1.2-billion, 65-MwNational Security Agency data center, tobe built at Fort Williams, Utah. It is oneo the largest jobs out there, says Makeso Turner, which is joint-venturing withKiewit and Jacobsen Construction as oneo ve teams competing or the job. Skan-ska is leading another team bidding it.That is the big one, says Skanskas Mc-

Nally.Demographic pressure is driving the

need or projects in some markets, suchas health care. One such market is health

ber o private owners that like the security o having a bond, he says.

Searching for Glimmers of HopeFor most contractors, there is little signthe market will take o any time soon.However, some contractors are startingto get optimistic the market is poised tostart a slow climb up rom the bottom.We are starting to see green shoots grow-ing in places we did not expect, saysKlustner. He says build-to-suit projectsare beginning to come online.

A ew contractors are bene tting romcorporate build-to-suit projects. Thereare several large corporations developingand building or their own needs, saysDonnelly o ValleyCrest. For example, ValleyCrest is working with Holder Con-

struction and Flintco Cos. on OklahomaCitys new Devon Energy building, which will be the tallest building in Oklahoma,he says.

1 thE tuRNER coRp. 6,898.8

2 tutoR pERINI coRp. 4,033.9

3 claRK GRoup 3,774.3

4 SKaNSKa uSa 3,398.8

5 BalFouR BEatty uS 3,345.8

6 thE whItING-tuRNER coNtRactING co. 2,989.17 BovIS lENd lEaSE 2,972.0

8 GIlBaNE BuIldING co. 2,837.7

9 hENSEl phElpS coNStRuctIoN co. 2,607.3

10 mccaRthy holdINGS INc. 2,426.0

11 JE duNN coNStRuctIoN GRoup 2,339.4

12 StRuctuRE toNE 2,147.2

13 huNt coNStRuctIoN GRoup INc. 1,856.0

14 BRaSFIEld & GoRRIE llc 1,741.0

15 moRtENSoN coNStRuctIoN 1,734.7

16 SuFFolK coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 1,710.3

17 maNhattaN coNStRuctIoN GRoup 1,385.0


19 thE FlINtco coS. INc. 1,244.0

20 thE walSh GRoup ltd. 1,210.721 thE yatES coS. INc. 1,141.6

22 thE wEItZ co. 1,104.9

23 SwINERtoN INc. 1,086.1

24 pEppER coNStRuctIoN GRoup 974.2

25 KIEwIt coRp. 961.8

26 vallEycRESt laNdScapE coS. 937.0

27 KBR 935.0

28 huNt BuIldING co. ltd. 907.2

29 auStIN INduStRIES 860.5

30 oKlaNd coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 806.4

31 hoFFmaN coRp. 799.232 wEBcoR BuIldERS 794.3

33 hItt coNtRactING INc. 762.4

34 davId E. haRvEy BuIldERS INc. 755.0

35 huNtER RoBERtS coNStRuctIoN GRoup llc 738.2

36 plaZa coNStRuctIoN coRp. 725.0

37 dpR coNStRuctIoN INc. 720.6

38 RoBINS & moRtoN 713.1

39 duKE coNStRuctIoN 705.7

40 thE laytoN coS. 703.6

41 walBRIdGE 694.2

42 powER coNStRuctIoN co. llc 692.0

43 BaRtoN malow co. 687.1

44 mESSER coNStRuctIoN co. 648.1

45 SuNdt coNStRuctIoN INc. 633.146 thE howaRd S. wRIGht coS. 621.9

47 Shawmut dESIGN aNd coNStRuctIoN 613.5

48 adolFSoN & pEtERSoN coNStRuctIoN 608.5

49 SEllEN coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 580.0

50 dImEo coNStRuctIoN co. 567.8

The Top 50 in DomeSTic GeneRal BuilDinG ReVenue* 2009 2009RaNK FIRm total RaNK FIRm total


*2009 revenue in $ mil.; rAnked by dOmestic revenue, including cOnstructiOn mAnAg ement-At-risk fOr generAl building And mAnufActuring plAnts. excludes prOcess plAnts.


8/39


care. The ederal health-care re orm-billdebate did stall some projects, but many contractors in that sector are not con-cerned. There is a long lead time ormany health-care projects, so the debatesin Congress didnt stop the market asmuch as it caused some projects to be de-layed, says Klustner o Weitz. He saysthere will be an acceleration o projectscoming online now that the ederal regu-

latory picture is becoming clearer.However, even demographics are bow-ing to the overall recession. One sector issenior living acilities. Older people arelooking to move into senior living acili-ties, but they have to sell their homes

rst, says Klustner. Once the housingmarket begins to rebound and home sales

begin to pick up, the senior living market will boom, he says.

Despite the nancial turmoil, therestill is a lot o institutional work ueled by charitable giving. Despite the economy,a lot o people have made an aw ul lot o money in the past ew years and now wantto leave a legacy, says Eberwein. Henotes that Nike Inc. ounder Phil Knighthas given money to build the $200-mil-

lion Matthew Knight Arena or the Uni- versity o Oregon in memory o his lateson. Ho man is the general contractor onthe project.

Knight also has donated money orStan ord University Graduate School o Business Knight Management Center, which is being constructed by Turner,

8.7

10 20 30 40 50

Building 11.812.9

14.5

12.413.9

5.76.5

11.6

0.60.60.51.01.01.1

0.20.1

0.10.5

1.1

Industrial Process

Manufacturing

Water

Sewer/Waste

Transportation

Hazardouz Waste

Power

Telecom

Other

PETROLEUM CONTINUES TO LEAD AMONG INTERNATIONAL MARKETS

2008 2009

2009: $55.58 billionMarket as % ofintl. revenue

46.348.7Petroleum

Makes notes. He says Turner is workingon numerous other projects being undedthrough philanthropy, including the JoelS. Smilow Cancer Center at the Yale NewHaven Medical Center, which is undedby the eponymous Yale graduate and or-mer chairman o Playtex Corp.

Road Show The upcoming transportation unding re-authorization ght in Congress has every-one in that market concerned. There hasbeen too much short-term thinking by Washington in trying to get the economy moving, says McNally o Skanska. The way to stimulate commerce and the econ-omy is to invest in in rastructure. He saysstate agency unds slowly are evaporating,and, without a guaranteed amount o ed-eral unding coming in, local governmentscant plan on long-term projects to boostthe economy.

McNally says one answer could be inpublic-private partnerships to invest inin rastructure. The problem is that moststates havent gotten on board yet. Hesays Virginia and Georgia are ahead o thepack in using P3, and that any successesin those states may spur a more wide-spread use o P3.

For many contractors in the in rastruc-ture market, P3 will become a necessity.

P3 will be the wave o the uture becauseit has to be, says Yancey o PCL. How-ever, he agrees with McNally that many states are struggling to determine what

orm P3 will take. In the meantime, PCLhas begun what it calls gap nancing,supplying some equity o its own to makesure projects are ully nanced to proceed.This process is awkward and complexand not something we like to do, butsometimes it is necessary to get the proj-ect o the ground, he says.

For many contractors, the ederal

unding package or high-speed rail wascause or optimism. However, not allshare in that optimism. We dont have[high-speed rail] actored into our strate-gic plan at the moment, says Landes o Herzog Contracting. He says the undingpackage provided what was essentially seed money to cash-strapped state agen-

O [TOP 400 cOnTracTOrs ]

20

15

10

5

0

14.2314.67

3.68 3.63

10.30

8.01

16.0015.13

9.74 9.72

3.074.43

2008 2009

EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST MARKETS SAG IN THE DOWNTURN

Canada Latin America Middle East Asia/Australia AfricaEurope

2008: $57.02 billion2009: $55.58 billion

Markets in $ billions


9/39


cies that cant a ord to start working onprojects. It would have been better toselect two or three corridors to start work on immediately, he says.

Bechtel is one contractor taking a closelook at U.S. high-speed rail. Dudley notesthat Bechtel is working on major light-railand high-speed-rail projects around the world, including London and Abu Dhabi.It also won the big Dulles metro rail con-nector in Virginia. Dudley says Bechtel would like to parlay that experience in thehigh-speed-rail arena when ull undingbecomes available.

Pulling the Plug The power market in the U.S. is in fux asregulatory uncertainty and the lack de-mand or new capacity has le t the pow-

erplant market foundering. Power is agrowth engine or us in the U.S., particu-larly i the nuclear market takes o , saysSeaton o Fluor.

For many contractors, the lack o reg-ulatory guidance is a real problem. It ishard or a utility to decide which way togo on new power generation until they know what the governments carbon pol-icy will be, says Dudley. We are waiting

or a decision rom Washington on car-bon. Will it be cap-and-trade? Will it bea tax? The industry just wants some cer-

tainty so we can proceed, says Seaton.Bernhard is uncertain o the prospectso major carbon legislation being passedbe ore elections in November. Even i there is no carbon bill, he believes there will be some restrictions on carbon emis-sions within the next two years. I thereis no legislation, there will probably becarbon-restriction regulations. The [EPA]has shown it believes it can restrict carbonemissions by regulation.

Seaton sees little uture or coal- redplants in the current political climate.

However, the Shaw Group is prepared todeal with coal regulation. I regulationsare too tough on coal- red plants, thereare three choices: close them, install newscrubbers or convert them to gas. We doall three, says Bernhard.

For many contractors, renewable en-ergy is the uture, but the uture is not

O [TOP 400 cOnTracTOrs ]

1 KIEwIt coRp. 2,931.9 27 10 4 0

2 thE walSh GRoup ltd. 2,121.4 48 6 10 0

3 SKaNSKa uSa 1,684.8 18 6 6 0

4 GRaNItE coNStRuctIoN INc. 1,511.0 76 0 1 0

5 thE Shaw GRoup INc. 1,222.9 11 1 0 19

6 BEchtEl 1,181.0 3 0 0 13

7 FluoR coRp. 1,180.6 7 0 0 9

8 thE laNE coNStRuctIoN coRp. 928.0 100 0 0 0

9 tutoR pERINI coRp. 776.8 16 0 0 0

10 claRK GRoup 764.2 15 0 0 0

11 auStIN INduStRIES 682.5 37 0 0 0

12 paRSoNS 626.9 29 6 4 14

13 layNE chRIStENSEN co. 623.7 0 37 48 2

14 amES coNStRuctIoN INc. 549.7 66 3 9 0

15 StERlING coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 547.0 89 4 7 0

16 FlatIRoN coNStRuctIoN coRp. 544.0 94 0 3 0

17 amERIcaN BRIdGE co. 533.2 100 0 0 018 wEEKS maRINE INc. 530.6 97 0 0 0

19 w.w. wEBBER llc 522.1 100 0 0 0

20 BalFouR BEatty uS 520.3 9 4 0 0

21 thE tuRNER coRp. 519.0 7 0 0 0

22 pcl coNStRuctIoN ENtERpRISES INc. 518.0 13 2 8 2

23 thE KoKoSING GRoup 505.7 49 24 1 0

24 wIllIamS BRothERS coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 460.2 100 0 0 0

25 thE huBBaRd GRoup 423.6 100 0 0 0

26 hENSEl phElpS coNStRuctIoN co. 419.2 14 0 0 0

27 mccaRthy holdINGS INc. 409.0 10 4 0 0

28 NEw ENtERpRISE StoNE & lImE co. INc. 402.1 96 0 0 0

29 hERZoG coNtRactING coRp. 400.8 99 1 0 0

30 maNSoN coNStRuctIoN co. 362.0 100 0 0 0

31 amERIcaN INFRaStRuctuRE 359.0 68 21 11 032 Stacy aNd wItBEcK INc. 350.5 100 0 0 0

33 tRayloR BRoS. INc. 343.8 42 16 37 0

34 uRS coRp. 341.0 5 0 5 6

35 FREd wEBER INc. 340.6 69 4 26 0

36 luNda coNStRuctIoN co. 328.0 87 0 4 0

37 RaIlwoRKS coRp. 328.0 100 0 0 0

38 GaRNEy holdING co. 323.7 0 31 69 0

39 thE Judlau coS. 320.9 90 0 10 0

40 vEcEllIo GRoup INc. 319.0 94 0 0 0

41 F.h. paSchEN, S.N. NIElSEN 317.4 27 28 0 0

42 RIEth-RIlEy coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 313.0 73 0 0 0

43 GREat laKES dREdGE & docK coRp. llc 312.0 100 0 0 0

44 J.d. aBRamS lp 307.8 100 0 0 0

45 clydE coS. INc. 305.4 78 3 13 046 huNt coNStRuctIoN GRoup INc. 284.0 13 0 0 0

47 INSItuFoRm tEchNoloGIES INc. 275.3 0 69 1 0

48 ch2m hIll 274.4 29 0 2 14

49 caRdI coRp. 268.0 100 0 0 0

50 JohN p. pIcoNE INc. 251.8 6 71 23 0

The Top 50 in DomeSTic heaVy conTRacToRS haZ.RaNK FIRm total* tRaNSp. SEwER watER waStE

*2009 revenue in $ mil.; =percent Of tOtAl dOmestic cOntrActing revenue. list is rAnked by dOmestic revenue, including cm-At-risk. includestrAnspOrtAtiOn, sewerAge, h AzAdOus wAste And wAter supply. excludes pOwerplAnts.


10/39


here yet. We think that photovoltaicpower and wind will be a major growthengine, but as a major market it still is twoto three years away, says Seaton. Westill see opportunities in the renewable-energy market, mostly on the large-scalesolar side rather than in wind, says Yancey o PCL.

Yancey says PCL also is looking at thenuclear market. We think nuclear willbecome more active in the next ve to six years. Yancey says PCL is looking intothe possibility o joint-venturing with themajor nuclear-plant constructors, ratherthan undertaking construction itsel .

Bernhard is con dent about the nu-clear market over the next ew years. Hesays China is building our nuclear plantsnow, and Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and theUnited Arab Emirates all have announcedplans or nuclear plants. That shows what they think is going to happen to oiland gas prices in the uture, he says Bern-hard notes Shaws partnership with West-inghouse has put the rm in the driversseat or much o the nuclear work in which Westinghouse technology is used.

In the oil-and-gas sector, the market is winding down in the U.S. We are nishingseveral major re nery projects here in theU.S. over the next year or two, but I dontsee anything new in the U.S. in the near

uture, says Dudley. He says the recessionhas taken its toll on domestic demand oroil and gas. There are a lot o import ter-minals that are standing empty right nowbecause o a lack o demand, he says.

The downstream oil market has alleno . We are on the backside o the ethyl-ene swing right now, says Seaton. At-tention has turned to upstream and o -shore work.

The allo in domestic demand or oilalso has taken its toll on the operations andmaintenance activity in the re nery market.

We are seeing oil producers put o shut-down/turnaround programs, says Seaton.Once the major oil companies becomemore com ortable with their balance sheets,the market will take o , he says.

A ter the big drop in oil prices a yearago, the slow rise in prices have allowedupstream work to get restarted around the

world, which has helped major contrac-tors nd work. The [national oil compa-nies] have not slowed their capital spend-ing much, says Seaton. He says Fluor hasbeen able to nd new work in the MiddleEast, Russia and in parts o A rica.

Our energy-and-chemicals group ispretty dormant right now, says ShawsBernhard. However, with oil prices onceagain approaching $85/bbl, he believesthe market is poised to grow again. Who would have thought 10 years ago that $85/bbl would be the new norm?

For major contractors, these are tryingtimes. Now, most are working hard tomanage their way through the recessionand come out stronger on the other side.We have been through major cycles inthe past, and that has helped us to main-

tain a more stable level o business and work orce through the current down-turn, says Seaton. It wont be our mostpro table year, but we will make a pro t,says Savage o Robins & Morton.


The Top 50 conTRacToRSWoRkinG aBRoaD*revenue: $55.4 billion of $55.6 billion

1 BEchtEl 14,849.0

2 FluoR coRp. 9,629.4

3 KBR 7,824.64 FoStER whEElER aG 4,401.6

5 mcdERmott INtERNatIoNal INc. 3,370.3


7 cB&I 2,537.0

8 KIEwIt coRp. 1,913.0

9 JacoBS 1,801.3

10 BlacK & vEatch 516.5

11 FlatIRoN coNStRuctIoN coRp. 478.0

12 thE Shaw GRoup INc. 446.9

13 coNtRacK INtERNatIoNal INc. 441.5

14 ch2m hIll 407.2

15 B.l. haRBERt INtERNatIoNal llc 331.9

16 wIllBRoS GRoup INc. 319.8

17 uRS coRp. 311.318 tutoR pERINI coRp. 297.8

19 amEc 194.5

20 INSItuFoRm tEchNoloGIES INc. 175.0

21 GREat laKES dREdGE & docK coRp. llc 172.7

22 thE lauREN coRp. 155.9

23 paRSoNS 147.6

24 caddEll coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 125.1

25 dcK woRldwIdE llc 92.0

26 RaIlwoRKS coRp. 88.0

27 layNE chRIStENSEN co. 87.1

28 taGGaRt GloBal 84.0

29 walBRIdGE 84.0

30 alBERIcI coRp. 80.6

31 StRuctuRE toNE 73.932 vcc 70.0

33 vERSaR INc. 65.5

34 wEStoN SolutIoNS INc. 58.1

35 amERIcaN BRIdGE co. 55.2

36 c.w. dRIvER 45.3

37 tuRNER INduStRIES GRoup llc 41.2

38 thE BEcK GRoup 35.0

39 cdm 35.0

40 mIchElS coRp. 34.7

41 mwh GloBal 32.9

42 BuRNS & mcdoNNEll 31.0

43 m+w u.S. 30.9

44 KNutSoN coNStRuctIoN SERvIcES 30.0

45 ccc GRoup INc. 29.3

46 macKENZIE KEcK INc. 29.1

47 GIlBaNE BuIldING co. 27.5

48 whaRtoN-SmIth INc. 25.0

49 BERRy, a dIv. oF SuFFolK coNStRuctIoN 22.8

50 SuFFolK coNStRuctIoN co. INc. 22.8

*2009 revenue in $ mil.


11/39


12/39

[TOP 400]

enr.com M y 17, 2010 ENR 67

The Top 400 ConTraCTorS Markets (% of 2009 revenue)

Rank 2009 Revenue 2009 new Gen. wtR./SwR . InduS./ Haz. tele- CM-at-RISk 2010 2009 FIRM total Intl. ContRaCtS BldG. MFG. PoweR waSte PetRo. tRanSP. waSte CoMM. % oF Rev.

51 60 vallEycRESt laNDScapE coS., C b s s, C i . 937.0 0.0 937.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

52 59 thE laNE coNStRuctioN coRp., Ch shir , C . 928.0 0.0 835.9 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

53 75 huNt BuilDiNG co. ltD., e P s , t x s 907.2 0.0 49.1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

54 55 SuNDt coNStRuctioN iNc., t mp , ari . 883.4 0.0 967.6 72 0 1 7 0 12 0 1 56

55 47 alBERici coR p., S . l is, M . 862.5 80.6 826.0 15 4 25 23 28 2 0 0 53

56 65 oKlaND coNStRuctioN co. iNc., S l Ci y, u h 808.6 0.0 345.9 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 77

57 64 layNE chRiStENSEN co., Missi w s, k . 804.4 87.1 931.5 0 0 0 76 0 0 2 0 0

58 30 wEBcoR BuilDERS, S M , C i . 803.9 0.0 na 99 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

59 67 hitt coNtRactiNG iNc., F s Ch rch, v . 762.4 0.0 520.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

60 80 clayco iNc., S . l is, M . 755.0 0.0 760.0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 58 DaviD E. haRvEy BuilDERS iNc., H s , t x s 755.0 0.0 420.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76

62 70 huNtER RoBERtS coNStRuctioN GRoup llc, n Y r , n.Y. 738.2 0.0 521.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85

63 66 thE laytoN coS., S y, u h 731.7 0.0 703.0 95 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 86

64 62 DuKE coNStRuctioN, I i p is, I . 728.8 0.0 414.0 90 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 45

65 51 plaZa coNStRuctioN coRp., n Y r , n.Y. 725.0 0.0 300.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56

66 68 RoBiNS & MoRtoN,Birmi gh m, a . 713.1 0.0 482.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

67 85 aMES coNStRuctioN iNc., B r s i , Mi . 707.7 0.0 498.1 1 14 7 12 0 66 0 0 4

68 114 powER coNStRuctioN co. llc, Sch mb rg, I . 692.0 0.0 556.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88

69 71 thE KoKoSiNG GRoup,Fr ric , ohi 691.0 0.0 464.1 7 0 4 24 9 49 0 0 9

70 155 caDDEll coNStRuctioN co. iNc., M g m ry, a . 690.9 125.1 356.8 99 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

71 87 MatRix SERvicE co., t s , o . 689.7 21.2 636.1 0 0 9 0 89 0 0 0 0

72 81 ShEEhaN pipE liNE coNStRuctioN co., t s , o . 672.0 0.0 121.0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0

73 99 MESSER coNStRuctioN co., Ci ci i, ohi 670.2 0.0 293.0 97 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 73

74 123 B.l. haRBERt iNtERNatioNal llc, Birmi gh m, a . 653.0 331.9 508.5 98 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

75 ** pERFoRMaNcE coNtRactoRS iNc., B R g , l . 653.0 0.0 510.0 0 0 7 0 93 0 0 0 0

76 79 aDolFSoN & pEtERSoN coNStRuctioN, Mi p is, Mi . 646.0 0.0 697.7 91 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 75

77 73 ShawMut DESiGN aND coNStRuctioN, B s , M ss. 630.6 17.1 352.7 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

78 63 thE howaRD S. wRiGht coS., S , w sh. 621.9 0.0 512.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96

79 72 o&G iNDuStRiES iNc.,t rri g , C . 613.4 0.0 354.3 36 1 50 0 0 13 0 0 13

80 61 thE BEcK GRoup, d s, t x s 611.8 35.0 330.3 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 69

81 126 KENNy coNStRuctioN, n r hbr , I .

589.8 0.0 217.9 10 0 68 19 0 3 0 0 7882 113 aMERicaN BRiDGE co.,C r p is, P . 588.4 55.2 215.9 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

83 120 pJ DicK-tRuMBull-liNDy paviNG, Pi sb rgh, P . 585.0 0.0 412.0 56 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 34

84 118 F.h. paSchEN, S.N. NiElSEN, Chic g , I . 583.6 0.0 300.0 46 0 0 28 0 27 0 0 1

85 121 SEllEN coNStRuctioN co. iNc., S , w sh. 580.0 0.0 460.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

86 181 DiMEo coNStRuctioN co., Pr i c , R.I. 567.8 0.0 288.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97

87 138 iNSituFoRM tEchNoloGiES iNc., Ch s rf , M . 566.2 175.0 777.3 0 0 0 74 26 0 0 0 1

88 112 c.w. DRivER, P s , C i . 552.2 45.3 375.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92

89 151 wEEKS MaRiNE iNc.,Cr r , n.J. 548.7 3.1 611.0 0 0 0 0 3 97 0 0 0

90 83 JaMES MchuGh coNStRuctioN co., Chic g , I . 547.9 0.0 300.0 88 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0

91 171 StERliNG coNStRuctioN co. iNc., H s , t x s 547.0 0.0 301.0 0 0 0 11 0 89 0 0 0

92 93 DcK woRlDwiDE llc, Pi sb rgh, P . 542.0 92.0 361.0 79 0 0 0 3 18 0 0 0

93 86 thE BolDt co., app , wis. 534.4 0.0 253.9 68 1 25 0 4 1 0 0 63

94 136 chaNEN coNStRuctioN co. iNc., Ph ix, ari . 533.0 0.0 533.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

95 97 BuRNS & McDoNNEll,k s s Ci y, M . 532.2 31.0 na 14 5 53 3 22 2 1 0 096 124 KitchEll coR p., Ph ix, ari . 530.5 0.0 576.2 99 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 100

97 133 cRoSSlaND coNStRuctioN co., C mb s, k . 527.5 0.0 451.2 80 1 0 9 5 3 0 0 8

98 115 BaRNhill coNtRactiNG co., t rb r , n.C. 523.0 0.0 222.0 42 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 30

99 ** w.w. wEBBER llc, H s , t x s 522.1 0.0 443.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

100 127 coRE coNStRuctioN GRoup, Ph ix, ari . 520.0 0.0 499.0 94 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 38


13/39

[TOP 400]

68 ENR M y 17, 2010 enr.com



101 98 pRiMoRiS coR p., l F r s , C i . 520.0 20.0 830.0 0 0 15 13 71 0 0 0 0

102 108 vcc, li R c , ar . 520.0 70.0 460.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13

103 161 lEchaSE coNStRuctioN SERvicES llc, R ch s r, n.Y. 509.9 0.0 625.4 93 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 55

104 82 hathaway DiNwiDDiE coNStRuctioN, S Fr cisc , C i . 497.3 0.0 590.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

105 142 BERNaRDS,S F r , C i . 485.0 0.0 305.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44

106 147 GREat laKES DREDGE & DocK coRp. llc, o Br , I . 484.7 172.7 517.6 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

107 215 SattERFiElD & poNtiKES coNStRuctioN, H s , t x s 480.0 0.0 480.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42

108 110 oNEil iNDuStRiES iNc., Chic g , I . 478.6 0.0 460.8 88 10 0 0 0 1 0 1 74

109 122 BERRy, a DiviSioN oF SuFFolK coNStRuctioN, d rs, M ss. 475.8 22.8 410.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

110 84 KRauS-aNDERSoN coNStRuctioN co., Mi p is, Mi . 473.0 0.0 430.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97

111 37 FaGEN iNc.,Gr i F s, Mi . 469.5 0.0 439.8 0 0 16 0 84 0 0 0 0

112 106 MiRoN coNStRuctioN co. iNc., n h, wis. 469.5 0.0 555.1 74 2 7 7 10 0 0 0 42

113 96 BiG-D coNStRuctioN coRp., S l Ci y, u h 467.0 0.0 265.0 67 6 0 0 13 0 0 0 62

114 101 JaMES G. DaviS coNStRuctioN coRp., R c i , M . 462.0 0.0 327.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

115 148 SpawGlaSS holDiNG lp, S m , t x s 461.0 0.0 332.0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 58

116 109 williaMS BRothERS coNStRuctioN co. iNc., H s , t x s 460.2 0.0 451.1 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

117 74 thE McShaNE coS., R s m , I . 458.3 0.0 238.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19

118 88 haSKEll, J c s i , F . 452.0 10.5 429.9 45 36 0 10 9 0 0 0 17

119 175 S.J. aMoRoSo coNStRuctioN co. iNc., R Sh r s, C i . 451.2 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

120 156 BaRtlEtt cocKE GENERal coNtRactoRS, S a i , t x s 450.9 0.0 312.5 98 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 90

121 165 NaBholZ coNStRuctioN coRp., C y, ar . 450.8 0.0 445.0 84 5 0 0 0 0 0 11 0

122 117 liNBEcK GRoup llc, H s , t x s 448.3 0.0 111.1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91

123 139 GRay coNStRuctioN, l xi g , ky. 446.8 0.0 248.7 38 40 0 0 21 0 0 0 0

124 179 JacoBSEN coNStRuctioN co. iNc., S l Ci y, u h 444.0 0.0 214.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62

125 196 coNtRacK iNtERNatioNal iNc., Mcl , v . 441.5 441.5 334.0 85 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0

126 119 JoSEph JiNGoli & SoN iNc., l r c i , n.J. 437.5 0.0 437.5 32 0 67 1 0 0 0 0 14

127 92 waltoN coNStRuctioN co. llc, k s s Ci y, M . 436.0 0.0 315.7 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

128 150 F.a. wilhElM coNStRuctioN co. iNc., I i p is, I . 434.1 0.0 300.0 81 3 5 0 10 1 0 0 83

129 208 RiEth-RilEy coNStRuctioN co. iNc., G sh , I . 430.0 0.0 430.0 7 10 0 0 0 73 0 0 0

130 91 thE haNovER co., H s , t x s 427.0 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

131 100 aMEc, t c r, G .

425.2 194.5 na 33 0 31 4 14 4 0 0 0 132 129 walSh BRothERS iNc., B s , M ss. 425.0 0.0 300.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

133 154 thE huBBaRD GRoup, wi r P r , F . 423.6 0.0 365.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

134 164 RoDGERS BuilDERS iNc.,Ch r , n.C. 420.9 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79

135 153 ccc GRoup iNc., S a i , t x s 420.4 29.3 285.4 2 0 12 0 74 2 0 0 0

136 152 KiNSlEy coNStRuctioN iNc., Y r , P . 418.8 0.0 516.2 62 9 1 5 0 17 0 0 18

137 162 NEw ENtERpRiSE StoNE & liME co. iNc., n e rpris , P . 417.4 0.0 315.8 3 0 0 0 0 96 0 1 0

138 146 RailwoRKS co Rp., n Y r , n.Y. 416.0 88.0 295.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

139 207 KaiSER FouNDatioN hEalth plaN iNc., a h im, C i . 415.0 0.0 415.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

140 160 w.M. JoRDaN co. iNc., n p r n s, v . 410.2 0.0 431.0 98 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 73

141 116 claNcy & thEyS coNStRuctioN co., R igh, n.C. 409.6 0.0 435.1 91 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 77

142 232 tEllEpSEN, H s , t x s 409.1 0.0 337.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

143 128 StEllaR, J c s i , F . 403.5 13.2 391.1 17 0 10 0 73 0 0 0 0

144 191 civES StEEl co., R s , G . 402.0 0.0 300.0 70 12 9 0 9 0 0 0 0

145 188 hERZoG coNtRactiNG coRp., S . J s ph, M . 400.8 0.0 245.3 0 0 0 1 0 99 0 0 0 146 103 GRaycoR, H m , I . 395.0 1.3 256.0 15 15 19 0 51 0 0 0 29

147 158 Boh BRoS. coNStRuctioN co. llc, n or s, l . 394.4 0.0 403.9 8 0 1 8 28 40 0 0 0

148 94 GothaM coNStRuctioN co. llc, n Y r , n.Y. 394.2 0.0 129.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

149 140 S.M. wilSoN & co., S . l is, M . 386.7 0.0 214.6 90 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 94

150 141 piZZaGalli coNStRuctioN co., S. B r i g , v . 383.2 0.0 229.7 29 8 3 59 0 0 0 1 41


14/39

[TOP 400]




151 69 DEvcoN coNStRuctioN iNc., Mi pi s, C i . 382.0 0.0 400.0 90 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

152 105 E.E. REED coNStRuctioN lp, S g r l , t x s 380.8 0.0 124.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18

153 186 BBl coNStRuctioN SERvicES llc, a b y, n.Y. 379.8 0.0 221.1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32

154 195 FRu-coN holDiNG coRp., w bri g , v . 377.1 0.0 377.1 74 0 0 24 0 2 0 0 100

155 107 hoaR coNStRuctioN llc, Birmi gh m, a . 375.4 0.0 755.6 84 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 87

156 228 caJuN iNDuStRiES llc, B R g , l . 374.3 0.0 113.0 0 0 0 41 55 4 0 0 0

157 ** taGGaRt GloBal, C sb rg, P . 371.0 84.0 277.0 0 0 29 0 8 0 0 0 0

158 77 EMJ coR p., Ch g , t . 369.7 0.0 284.2 87 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 5

159 95 thE pENta BuilDiNG GRoup, l s v g s, n . 367.0 0.0 346.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75

160 134 lEaSE cRutchER lEwiS, S , w sh. 366.9 0.0 170.5 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13

161 163 McGouGh coNStRuctioN, S . P , Mi . 366.0 0.0 310.0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 69

162 251 BowEN ENGiNEERiNG coRp.,I i p is, I . 365.0 0.0 365.0 0 0 70 25 5 0 0 0 0

163 270 tRayloR BRoS. iNc., e s i , I . 364.5 0.0 1,016.0 2 0 4 53 0 42 0 0 0

164 194 MaNSoN coNStRuctioN co., S , w sh. 362.0 0.0 na 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

165 205 lEE lEwiS coNStRuctioN iNc., l bb c , t x s 361.0 0.0 285.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82

166 213 luNDa coNStRuctioN co., B c Ri r F s, wis. 360.0 0.0 na 7 0 0 4 2 87 0 0 0

167 166 aMERicaN iNFRaStRuctuRE, w rc s r, P . 359.0 0.0 507.1 0 0 0 32 0 68 0 0 0

168 89 choatE coNStRuctioN co., a , G . 358.7 0.0 360.0 86 0 0 8 6 0 0 0 91

169 149 thE ciaNBRo coS., Pi sf , M i 354.2 0.0 271.7 5 0 21 3 38 27 0 0 0

170 201 thE lauREN coRp., abi , t x s 353.0 155.9 84.9 0 0 46 0 37 0 0 0 0

171 212 Stacy aND witBEcK iNc., a m , C i . 350.5 0.0 230.5 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

172 354 thoS. S. ByRNE ltD., F r w r h, t x s 350.0 0.0 150.0 79 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 57

173 172 thE chRiStMaN co., l si g, Mich. 348.4 0.0 336.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74

174 ** williaMS iNDuStRial SERvicES GRoup llc, t c r, G . 348.0 0.0 348.0 0 0 91 0 6 0 3 0 0

175 168 thE JayNES coS., a b q rq , n.M. 347.7 0.0 206.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70

176 143 hawaiiaN DREDGiNG coNStRuctioN co. iNc., H , H ii 345.3 0.0 514.1 44 0 17 7 0 26 0 0 0

177 157 vEcEllio GRoup iNc., w s P m B ch, F . 343.6 2.6 273.0 0 0 0 0 6 94 0 0 0

178 211 FRED wEBER iNc.,M ry H igh s, M . 340.6 0.0 na 0 0 0 31 0 69 0 0 0

179 173 SauNDERS coNStRuctioN iNc., C i , C . 340.0 0.0 418.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82

180 176 M.B. KahN coNStRuctioN co. iNc., C mbi , S.C. 339.6 0.0 141.3 89 1 1 8 0 1 0 0 24

181 224 williaM chaRlES coNStRuctioN llc, l s P r , I .

337.2 0.0 124.1 41 0 0 7 0 52 0 0 0 182 135 Gly coNStRuctioN iNc., B , w sh. 336.5 0.0 158.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

183 137 aNDERSoN coS., G p r , Miss. 336.0 0.0 191.0 83 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

184 239 MoRlEy BuilDERS, S M ic , C i . 333.8 0.0 180.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

185 144 aNDERSoN coluMBia co. iNc., l Ci y, F . 332.1 0.0 160.7 0 36 0 0 0 64 0 0 0

186 189 Fci coNStRuctoRS iNc., Gr J c i , C . 327.1 0.0 214.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73

187 193 GRuNlEy coNStRuctioN co. iNc., R c i , M . 326.0 0.0 334.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

188 294 wEStoN SolutioNS iNc., w s Ch s r, P . 325.7 58.1 330.0 65 0 0 3 0 0 31 0 16

189 185 toRcoN iNc., R B , n.J. 325.0 20.0 618.0 72 0 0 0 22 6 0 0 75

190 233 clyDE coS. iNc., or m, u h 323.9 0.0 316.7 3 0 0 16 0 78 0 0 0

191 178 GaRNEy holDiNG co., k s s Ci y, M . 323.7 0.0 249.0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 10

192 235 FoRREStER coNStRuctioN co., R c i , M . 322.0 0.0 500.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60

193 ** thE JuDlau coS., C g P i , n.Y. 321.2 0.0 348.0 0 0 0 10 0 90 0 0 0

194 259 DEMattEiS oRGaNiZatioNS, e m , n.Y. 320.9 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23

195 210 GE JohNSoN coNStRuctioN co., C r Spri gs, C . 320.0 0.0 295.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 290 ShiEl SExtoN co. iNc., I i p is, I . 320.0 0.0 315.0 93 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 94

197 217 lyDiG coNStRuctioN iNc., Sp v y, w sh. 319.7 0.0 183.7 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14

198 111 coaStal coNStRuctioN GRoup, Mi mi, F . 316.5 0.0 81.8 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88

199 301 RENtENBach coNStRuctoRS iNc., k x i , t . 314.3 0.0 168.0 97 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 78

200 187 KNutSoN coNStRuctioN SERvicES, Mi p is, Mi . 314.0 30.0 230.0 73 0 10 1 16 0 0 0 64


15/39




201 90 haRDiN coNStRuctioN co. llc, a , G . 313.8 0.0 382.2 89 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 74

202 218 iNDuStRial coNtRactoRS iNc., e s i , I . 310.0 0.0 319.6 10 1 39 0 49 0 0 1 12

203 170 ShElco iNc., Ch r , n.C. 307.9 0.0 282.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

204 286 J.D. aBRaMS lp, a s i , t x s 307.8 0.0 170.7 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

205 209 KEy coNStRuctioN iNc., wichi , k . 304.8 0.0 304.8 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23

206 245 RoEBBElEN,e d r Hi s, C i . 302.6 0.0 157.4 63 0 9 0 0 0 0 28 0

207 230 BaRNaRD coNStRuctioN co. iNc., B m , M . 295.7 0.0 111.8 0 0 0 70 30 0 0 0 0

208 220 J. FlEtchER cREaMER & SoN iNc., H c s c , n.J. 295.0 0.0 266.6 10 0 4 19 4 27 13 23 0

209 285 oRioN MaRiNE GRoup iNc.,H s , t x s 293.5 0.0 na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

210 242 whaRtoN-SMith iNc., l M r , F . 292.6 25.0 266.2 43 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 45

211 182 lpciMiNElli iNc., B , n.Y. 291.2 0.0 497.2 95 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 86

212 203 MaScaRo coNStRuctioN co. lp, Pi sb rgh, P . 289.5 0.0 238.6 76 0 11 0 1 12 0 0 60

213 ** GRahaM GRoup uS, S , w sh. 289.2 0.0 269.5 88 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 21

214 237 coNSiGli coNStRuctioN co. iNc., Mi r , M ss. 284.3 0.0 437.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77

215 229 ihc coNStRuctioN coS. llc, e gi , I . 281.8 0.0 111.0 58 0 0 32 0 2 0 8 57

216 190 thE BEttE coS., l h m, n.Y. 281.5 0.0 173.0 90 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 67

217 267 J.p. cullEN & SoNS iNc., J s i , wis. 281.1 0.0 159.9 95 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 70

218 192 S&B ENGiNEERS aND coNStRuctoRS ltD., H s , t x s 281.0 0.0 474.0 0 0 2 0 98 0 0 0 0

219 ** coGDEll SpENcER ERDMaN (SM),Ch r , n.C. 280.6 0.0 145.1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

220 216 JoRDaN coNStRuctioN, e P s , t x s 279.0 0.0 263.8 88 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 14

221 284 t.N. waRD co., ar m r , P . 278.6 0.0 186.7 98 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 87

222 288 cG SchMiDt iNc., Mi , wis. 278.3 0.0 148.0 96 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 99

223 274 coNti GRo up, S h P i f , n.J. 276.0 0.0 191.3 16 0 0 6 0 47 32 0 0

224 263 w.G. MillS iNc., S r s , F . 275.0 0.0 145.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77

225 261 KBS iNc., Richm , v . 274.0 0.0 178.0 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 75

226 275 caRDi co Rp., w r ic , R.I. 268.0 0.0 180.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

227 219 SlEttEN coS., Gr F s, M . 266.1 0.0 80.6 65 0 0 20 0 15 0 0 49

228 238 c. ovERaa & co., Richm , C i . 265.3 0.0 290.2 54 0 3 25 18 0 0 0 0

229 ** lEviNE BuilDERS, d g s , n.Y. 264.0 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

230 200 thE KoRtE co., High , I . 263.1 0.0 299.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

231 313 DaNiS BuilDiNG coNStRuctioN co., Mi misb rg, ohi

260.0 0.0 165.0 94 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 69 232 276 thE DENNiS ENGiNEERiNG GRoup llc,Spri gf , M ss. 259.8 20.9 105.0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0

233 ** cDi coNtRactoRS llc, li R c , ar . 258.3 0.0 258.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

234 132 S.D. DEacoN coRp., Ci r s H igh s, C i . 255.1 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

235 258 oDEBREcht coNStRuctioN iNc., C r G b s, F . 253.3 0.0 360.4 3 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 9

236 130 paNattoNi coNStRuctioN iNc., S cr m , C i . 252.0 0.0 170.0 92 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

237 272 J.F. whitE coNtRactiNG co., Fr mi gh m, M ss. 251.8 0.0 197.0 13 0 0 16 0 69 0 2 0

238 335 JohN p. picoNE iNc., l r c , n.Y. 251.8 0.0 248.7 0 0 0 94 0 6 0 0 0

239 206 thE BRaNch GRoup iNc., R , v . 250.0 0.0 186.3 37 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0

240 249 cDM, C mbri g , M ss. 248.0 35.0 459.0 17 1 2 54 12 0 13 0 3

241 330 haRpER coNStRuctioN co. iNc., S di g , C i . 247.0 0.0 448.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

242 223 lEopaRDo coS. iNc., H m es s, I . 246.6 0.0 171.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47

243 256 GaRco coNStRuctioN iNc., Sp , w sh. 242.5 0.0 120.0 47 9 0 4 2 20 0 0 0

244 311 ShiMMicK coNStRuctioN co. iNc., o , C i . 241.4 0.0 191.7 0 0 0 74 0 26 0 0 0

245 351 GEMMa powER SyStEMS, G s b ry, C . 241.3 0.0 53.6 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 246 331 BNBuilDERS iNc.,S , w sh. 240.0 0.0 105.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63

247 227 J.h. FiNDoRFF & SoN iNc.,M is , wis. 240.0 0.0 275.0 83 8 0 0 4 4 0 0 71

248 307 woRth coNStRuctioN co. iNc., B h , C . 239.4 0.0 96.8 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

249 174 Mwh GloBal, Br mf , C . 238.8 32.9 336.3 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0

250 183 thE RuDolph/liBBE coS. iNc., w bri g , ohi 235.6 0.0 143.1 25 14 5 0 34 17 0 0 12

[TOP 400]


16/39

[TOP 400]




251 145 BatSoN-cooK co., w s P i , G . 235.1 0.0 136.9 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24

252 296 haRKiNS BuilDERS iNc., M rri s i , M . 233.9 0.0 182.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

253 346 cahill coNtRactoRS iNc., S Fr cisc , C i . 232.4 0.0 106.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

254 280 haRpER iNDuStRiES iNc., P c h, ky. 231.5 0.0 62.7 45 0 16 0 10 2 0 0 45

255 374 ShooK NatioNal coRp., d y , ohi 228.7 0.0 244.7 48 1 3 26 0 0 0 22 42

256 243 JoERiS GENERal coNtRactoRS ltD., S a i , t x s 228.1 0.0 236.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55

257 287 SEvENSoN ENviRoNMENtal SERvicES,ni g r F s, n.Y. 227.9 0.9 345.7 0 0 0 6 0 0 94 0 0

258 277 E.w. howEll co. llc, P i i , n.Y. 227.4 0.0 282.6 99 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 36

259 260 SuMMit BuilDERS, Ph ix, ari . 226.9 0.0 183.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69

260 ** aMERicaN coNStRuctoRS, a s i , t x s 226.0 0.0 226.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96

261 292 SupERioR coNStRuctioN co. iNc., G ry, I . 225.4 0.0 198.7 0 0 0 0 58 42 0 0 0

262 309 aBShER coNStRuctioN co., P y p, w sh. 223.0 0.0 84.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41

263 299 FNF coNStRuctioN iNc., t mp , ari . 222.9 0.0 135.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 14

264 221 RMt iNc., M is , wis. 221.0 0.0 107.0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0

265 264 thE piKE co. iNc., R ch s r, n.Y. 215.0 0.0 212.0 96 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 60

266 271 KBE BuilDiNG coRp.,F rmi g , C . 213.7 0.0 1.5 96 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 46

267 293 DoStER coNStRuctioN co., Birmi gh m, a . 213.2 0.0 245.5 96 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 48

268 306 c.D. SMith coNStRuctioN, F l c, wis. 212.0 0.0 180.0 81 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0

269 199 wElBRo BuilDiNG coRp., M i , F . 211.9 0.0 73.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10

270 246 thE walSh GRo up, P r , or . 211.7 0.0 227.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

271 214 BaRR & BaRR iNc.,n Y r , n.Y. 210.0 0.0 210.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

272 300 pulicE coNStRuctioN iNc., Ph ix, ari . 210.0 0.0 150.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 12

273 356 tERMiNal coNStRuctioN coRp., w -Ri g , n.J. 210.0 0.0 200.0 90 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0

274 322 BaylEy coNStRuctioN, M rc r Is , w sh. 207.8 0.0 207.8 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

275 ** thE pBSJ coRp., t mp , F . 207.1 0.0 110.0 94 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 82

276 266 whitE-SpuNNER coNStRuctioN iNc., M bi , a . 207.0 0.0 165.0 71 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

277 369 GRaNGER coNStRuctioN co., l si g, Mich. 206.7 0.0 173.7 93 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 59

278 248 RocKFoRD coNStRuctioN co. iNc., Gr R pi s, Mich. 205.7 0.0 132.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64

279 319 Ray BEll coNStRuctioN co. iNc., Br , t . 205.4 0.0 96.2 56 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 22

280 225 aNDERSEN coNStRuctioN co., P r , or . 205.0 0.0 426.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

281 241 BullEy & aNDREwS llc, Chic g , I . 205.0 0.0 117.0 84 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 282 282 J.J. whitE iNc., Phi phi , P . 205.0 01.0 41.0 12 5 15 5 61 0 0 2 5

283 326 ENGiNEERED StRuctuRES iNc.,B is , I h 202.0 0.0 243.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

284 295 howaRD ShocKEy & SoNS iNc., wi ch s r, v . 201.2 0.0 93.8 76 0 0 0 14 11 0 0 0

285 315 hill & wilKiNSoN GENERal coNtRactoRS, P , t x s 201.0 0.0 142.0 89 3 0 0 3 0 1 3 0

286 226 aRco/MuRRay coNStRuctioN coS., S . l is, M . 200.6 3.3 123.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

287 244 paRic coRp., oF , M . 200.0 0.0 303.0 100 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 69

288 184 h&M co. iNc., J c s , t . 199.0 0.0 237.0 39 15 0 0 46 0 0 0 0

289 ** RQ coNStRuctioN iNc., C r sb , C i . 198.3 0.0 131.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

290 265 McM coNStRuctioN iNc., n . High s, C i . 198.1 0.0 269.4 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

291 355 t.a. loviNG co., G sb r , n.C. 198.0 0.0 95.4 36 0 0 61 0 4 0 0 30

292 297 h.J. RuSSEll & co., a , G . 198.0 0.0 152.0 93 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 88

293 252 R&o coNStRuctioN, og , u h 197.9 0.0 194.4 96 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

294 308 RivER city coNStRuctioN llc, e. P ri , I . 196.2 0.0 192.5 76 7 0 17 0 0 0 0 19

295 240 RoGERS-oBRiEN coNStRuctioN, d s, t x s 195.9 0.0 91.1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 296 198 JaMES R. vaNNoy & SoNS coNStRuctioN co. iNc., J rs , n.C. 195.0 0.0 140.0 92 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8

297 302 claRKSoN coNStRuctioN co., k s s Ci y, M . 194.0 0.0 171.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

298 222 iNtEch coNStRuctioN iNc., Phi phi , P . 191.9 0.0 75.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99

299 268 coaKlEy & williaMS coNStRuctioN iNc., G i h rsb rg, M . 191.0 0.0 335.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

300 393 MiD EaStERN BuilDERS iNc. (MEB),Ch s p , v . 190.2 0.0 186.4 20 4 0 71 4 0 0 0 1


17/39

[TOP 400]


301 357 cRowDER coNStRuctioN co., Ch r , n.C. 190.1 0.0 105.1 6 0 40 46 1 7 0 0 0

302 316 hayDoN BuilDiNG coRp., Ph ix, ari . 190.0 0.0 160.0 53 0 0 11 0 37 0 0 46

303 312 hawKiNS coNStRuctioN co., om h , n b. 189.7 0.0 140.7 54 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 28

304 231 wEiS BuilDERS iNc., Mi p is, Mi . 185.4 0.0 165.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34

305 255 ElKhoRN holDiNGS, e s , wy . 185.0 0.0 210.0 0 0 2 0 98 0 0 0 0

306 ** J.E. KiNGhaM coNStRuctioN coS., n c g ch s, t x s 185.0 0.0 na 81 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 73

307 262 lylES coNStRuctioN GRo up, Fr s , C i . 184.3 0.0 69.0 0 0 0 82 13 4 0 0 0

308 180 MaRtiN-haRRiS coNStRuctioN, l s v g s, n . 184.0 0.0 179.3 96 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 9

309 283 aRMaDa hoFFlER coNStRuctioN co., virgi i B ch, v . 182.6 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

310 367 coRMaN coNStRuctioN iNc., a p is J c i , M . 182.2 0.0 39.7 0 0 0 7 0 93 0 0 0

311 ** thE RuhliN co., Sh r C r, ohi 181.4 0.0 152.0 72 0 0 0 4 25 0 0 0

312 336 SEMa coNStRuctioN iNc., C i , C . 180.8 0.0 187.6 0 0 0 18 0 82 0 0 0

313 324 claRK coNStRuctioN, l si g, Mich. 180.6 0.0 184.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77

314 340 iNtERStatE hiGhway coNStRuctioN iNc., e g , C . 180.0 0.0 114.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

315 368 thE MiDDlESEx coS., li , M ss. 179.7 0.0 98.9 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

316 253 Gh phippS coNStRuctioN coS., Gr vi g , C . 178.6 0.0 220.0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 92

317 ** M+w u.S., P , t x s 178.2 30.9 928.2 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

318 391 MccoRMicK iNc. & SuBSiDiaRiES,F rg , n.d. 177.4 0.0 141.9 3 0 3 7 0 87 0 0 0

319 ** Jay caShMaN iNc., Q i cy, M ss. 177.4 0.0 92.0 0 0 2 20 0 78 0 0 0

320 328 Q&D coNStRuctioN iNc., Sp r s, n . 177.0 0.0 98.7 31 2 0 6 1 44 0 0 0

321 341 Shaw coNStRuctioN, d r, C . 177.0 0.0 75.0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

322 314 BRiNDERSoN,C s M s , C i . 176.0 0.0 123.0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0

323 197 D.l. withERS coNStRuctioN, Ph ix, ari . 176.0 0.0 285.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73

324 279 JohN S. claRK co. llc, M airy, n.C. 175.5 0.0 121.3 96 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4

325 ** BRayMaN coNStRuctioN coRp., S x b rg, P . 174.1 0.0 na 6 16 3 0 0 74 0 0 0

326 ** BoZZuto coNStRuctioN co., Gr b , M . 170.3 0.0 101.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82

327 362 NEw South coNStRuctioN co. iNc., a , G . 170.0 0.0 132.0 61 0 0 0 22 17 0 0 85

328 ** SciENcE applicatioNS iNtERNatioNal coRp. (Saic), Mcl , v . 168.9 0.0 187.8 51 0 5 1 39 0 4 0 0

329 204 RoEl coNStRuctioN co. iNc., S di g , C i . 168.0 0.0 177.4 90 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0

330 343 KBD GRo up, a , G . 166.3 0.0 149.7 33 28 0 0 31 6 0 2 0

331 ** wolvERiNE BuilDiNG GRoup iNc., Gr R pi s, Mich.

165.6 0.0 77.0 91 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 332 ** RochE coNStRuctoRS iNc., Gr y, C . 165.4 0.0 90.8 99 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 17

333 339 cox & SchEpp iNc., Ch r , n.C. 165.0 0.0 300.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

334 ** thE liRo GRoup, Sy ss , n.Y. 163.4 0.0 na 65 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 100

335 352 BiS tEpSco iNc., d r P r , t x s 162.0 0.0 113.0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0

336 ** SuKut coNStRuctioN iNc., S a , C i . 161.3 0.0 106.0 9 0 0 66 0 21 5 0 0

337 332 w.l. ButlER coNStRuctioN iNc., R Ci y, C i . 161.0 0.0 283.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

338 250 ButZ ENtERpRiSES iNc., a , P . 160.9 0.0 192.8 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98

339 289 JoNES laNG laSallE coNStRuctioN lp, Chic g , I . 160.7 0.0 169.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90

340 269 BMwc GRoup iNc., I i p is, I . 160.0 0.0 100.0 3 6 19 0 72 0 0 0 0

341 317 hiNKlE coNtRactiNG coRp., P ris, ky. 160.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 3 0 0 98 0 0 0

342 376 thE NoRwooD co., M r , P . 160.0 0.0 63.6 70 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 44

343 353 BERGluND coNStRuctioN, Chic g , I . 159.0 0.0 200.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33

344 364 BluEScopE coNStRuctioN iNc., k s s Ci y, M . 158.0 0.0 164.7 61 8 0 0 12 19 0 0 0

345 ** t. J. laMBREcht coNStRuctioN iNc., J i , I . 155.4 0.0 136.0 4 0 7 13 0 76 0 0 0 346 400 piKE coNStRuctioN co. llc, P rs , n.J. 155.3 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

347 377 DaviS coNStRuctoRS & ENGiNEERS iNc., a ch r g , a s 151.5 0.0 133.9 79 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 35

348 ** NaN iNc., H , H ii 151.5 0.0 170.8 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

349 ** SilvERitE coNStRuctioN co. iNc., Hic s i , n.Y. 151.4 0.0 na 5 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0

350 257 KliNGER coS. iNc., Si x Ci y, I 151.0 0.0 108.0 26 15 2 0 57 0 0 0 0




18/39

[TOP 400]


351 390 QuaNDEl ENtERpRiSES iNc.,H rrisb rg, P . 149.7 0.0 91.8 90 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 56

352 ** McM, Mi mi, F . 149.4 0.0 167.1 22 0 0 6 0 73 0 0 3

353 380 EDGE DEvElopMENt iNc.,t m c , C i . 149.0 0.0 48.0 96 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0

354 ** thE GEoRGE Sollitt coNStRuctioN co., w d , I . 149.0 0.0 125.0 90 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 32

355 ** paRaDiGM coNStRuctioN co., ar i g , v . 148.3 0.0 148.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96

356 333 plaNt coNStRuctioN co. lp, S Fr cisc , C i . 148.2 0.0 66.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95

357 344 BRiNKMaNN coNStRuctoRS, Ch s rf , M . 147.0 0.0 125.0 69 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 25

358 ** EDiFicE iNc.,Ch r , n.C. 145.0 0.0 45.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10

359 360 aJax BuilDiNG coRp., Mi y, F . 144.0 0.0 100.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87

360 323 toNN aND BlaNK coNStRuctioN, Michig Ci y, I . 143.0 0.0 32.0 99 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

361 ** GaMMa coNStRuctioN co., H s , t x s 141.9 0.0 174.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

362 382 xl coNStRuctioN coRp., Mi pi s, C i . 140.8 0.0 91.0 31 20 2 0 46 0 0 0 0

363 359 hK SyStEMS iNc., Mi , wis. 140.7 2.4 111.0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

364 385 ENtact llc, Gr p i , t x s 140.1 0.1 45.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0

365 350 waDMaN coR p., og , u h 140.0 0.0 100.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57

366 ** EDwaRD KRaEMER & SoNS iNc.,P i , wis. 139.3 0.0 163.1 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

367 371 RoNcElli iNc., S r i g H igh s, Mich. 139.0 5.0 113.0 35 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 40

368 386 waGMaN coS., Y r , P . 136.7 0.0 161.4 23 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 9

369 320 coMMERcial coNtRactiNG GRoup, a b r Hi s, Mich. 135.5 10.5 129.0 18 65 2 1 14 0 0 0 0

370 ** pioNEER GENERal coNtRactoRS, Gr R pi s, Mich. 135.0 0.0 143.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

371 342 huNZiNGER coNStRuctioN co., Br f , wis. 134.7 0.0 46.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79

372 ** SySKa hENNESSy GRoup,n Y r , n.Y. 133.6 0.0 120.0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 54

373 ** GohMaNN aSphalt aND coNStRuctioN iNc., C r s i , I . 133.0 0.0 126.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

374 366 poSillico, F rmi g , n.Y. 133.0 0.0 195.0 0 0 0 12 0 54 30 0 0

375 278 piRtlE coNStRuctioN co., d i , F . 133.0 0.0 78.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94

376 387 BRaDBuRy StaMM coNStRuctioN iNc., a b q rq , n.M. 132.5 0.0 104.3 90 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 3

377 397 ulliMaN SchuttE coNStRuctioN llc, Mi misb rg, ohi 132.5 0.0 110.2 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 11

378 ** MEaDow vallEy coNtRactoRS iNc., Ph ix, ari . 131.8 0.0 37.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1

379 389 DoME coNStRuctioN coRp., S Fr cisc , C i . 131.4 0.0 145.3 70 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

380 ** BalDwiN & ShEll coNStRuctioN co., li R c , ar . 129.5 0.0 180.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91

381 ** SlayDEN coNStRuctioN GRoup iNc., S y , or . 127.4 0.0 60.2 18 0 8 55 0 19 0 0 55 382 ** taRltoN coRp., S . l is, M . 126.3 0.0 52.6 41 0 10 40 6 0 0 3 37

383 373 top GRaDE coNStRuctioN, li rm r , C i . 125.3 0.0 125.3 33 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0

384 ** iMc coNStRuctioN, M r , P . 125.0 0.0 48.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

385 ** Nova coRp., e g , n.J. 125.0 6.0 na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 47

386 ** GEoRGE haRMS coNStRuctioN co. iNc., F rmi g , n.J. 124.6 0.0 1.4 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0

387 398 pRiSMatic DEvElopMENt co Rp., F irf , n.J. 124.3 0.0 162.0 76 0 0 7 0 16 0 0 0

388 ** FlouRNoy coNStRuctioN co. llc, C mb s, G . 123.1 0.0 22.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

389 ** thE MoRGaNti GRoup iNc., d b ry, C . 121.4 21.1 112.1 97 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 81

390 304 alBERt c. KoBayaShi iNc., w ip h , H ii 121.0 0.0 35.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

391 ** FRoNtiER-KEMpER coNStRuctoRS iNc., e s i , I . 119.4 16.9 310.7 0 0 3 49 0 3 0 0 0

392 ** thE NEENaN co., F r C i s, C . 119.0 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

393 254 ElKiNS coNStRuctoRS iNc., J c s i , F . 116.8 0.0 138.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39

394 ** aMcc co Rp., l g Is Ci y, n.Y. 116.2 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

395 327 Fcl BuilDERS llc, I sc , I . 116.0 0.0 na 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 396 392 huNtER coNtRactiNG co., Gi b r , ari . 116.0 0.0 30.0 0 0 0 39 0 61 0 0 0

397 298 luSaRDi coNStRuctioN co., S M rc s, C i . 115.0 0.0 131.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

398 ** REMEDial coNStRuctioN SERvicES lp, H s , t x s 115.0 10.0 195.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0

399 375 GiBBS coNStRuctioN, H r h , l . 114.6 0.0 116.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

400 348 coNtiNENtal BuilDiNG SyStEMS, C mb s, ohi 113.5 0.0 114.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




19/39


where to find the top 400

firM rank firM rank firM rank firM rank

A A. Morton Thomas and Associates Inc. 372

Directory[TOP 400]

where to find the top 400

firM rank firM rank firM rank firM rank

AJ.D. Abrams LP 204 Absher Construction Co. 262

Adol son & Peterson Construction 76 Ajax Building Corp. 359 Alberici Corp. 55 AMCC Corp. 394 AMEC 131 American Bridge Co. 82 American Constructors 260 American In rastructure 167 Ames Construction Inc. 67S.J. Amoroso Construction Co. Inc. 119 Andersen Construction Co. 280 Anderson Columbia Co. Inc. 185 Anderson Cos. 183 ARCO/Murray Construction Cos. 286 Armada Ho er Construction

Co. 309 Austin Industries 29

BBaldwin & Shell Construction

Co. 380Bal our Beatty US 14Barnard Construction Co. Inc. 207Barnhill Contracting Co. 98Barr & Barr Inc. 271

Bartlett Cocke GeneralContractors 120

Barton Malow Co. 38Batson-Cook Co. 251Bayley Construction 274BBL Construction Services LLC 153Bechtel 1The Beck Group 80Ray Bell Construction Co. Inc. 279

Berglund Construction 343Bernards 105

Berry, a division o Su olk Construction 109

The BETTE Cos. 216Big-D Construction Corp. 113BIS TEPSCO Inc. 335Black & Veatch 34BlueScope Construction Inc. 344BMWC Group Inc. 340BNBuilders Inc. 246Boh Bros. Construction Co. LLC 147The Boldt Co. 93Bovis Lend Lease 18Bowen Engineering Corp. 162Bozzuto Construction Co. 326

Bradbury Stamm ConstructionInc. 376The Branch Group Inc. 239Brasfeld & Gorrie LLC 27Brayman Construction Corp. 325Brinderson 322Brinkmann Constructors 357Bulley & Andrews LLC 281

Burns & McDonnell 95W.L. Butler Construction Inc. 337Butz Enterprises Inc. 338

Thos. S. Byrne Ltd. 172C

Caddell Construction Co. Inc. 70Cahill Contractors Inc. 253Cajun Industries LLC 156Cardi Corp. 226Jay Cashman Inc. 319CB&I 15CCC Group Inc. 135CDI Contractors LLC 233CDM 240CH2M HILL 48Chanen Construction Co. Inc. 94William Charles Construction

LLC 181Choate Construction Co. 168The Christman Co. 173The Cianbro Cos. 169LPCiminelli Inc. 211Cives Steel Co. 144Clancy & Theys Construction

Co. 141Clark Construction 313Clark Group 11John S. Clark Co. LLC 324Clarkson Construction Co. 297Clayco Inc. 60Clyde Cos. Inc. 190

Coakley & Williams ConstructionInc. 299

Coastal Construction Group 198Cogdell Spencer ERDMAN (SM) 219Commercial Contracting Group 369

Consigli Construction Co. Inc. 214Conti Group 223Continental Building Systems 400Contrack International Inc. 125CORE Construction Group 100Corman Construction Inc. 310Cox & Schepp Inc. 333J. Fletcher Creamer & Son Inc. 208Crossland Construction Co. 97Crowder Construction Co. 301J.P. Cullen & Sons Inc. 217

DDanis Building Construction

Co. 231

Davis Constructors & EngineersInc. 347

James G. Davis ConstructionCorp. 114Day & Zimmermann 44dck Worldwide LLC 92S.D. Deacon Corp. 234DeMatteis Organizations 194The Dennis Engineering Group

LLC 232Devcon Construction Inc. 151

PJ Dick-Trumbull-Lindy Paving 83Dimeo Construction Co. 86Dome Construction Corp. 379

Doster Construction Co. 267DPR Construction Inc. 43C.W. Driver 88Duke Construction 64JE Dunn Construction Group 25

EEDGE Development Inc. 353Edifce Inc. 358Elkhorn Holdings 305Elkins Constructors Inc. 393EMJ Corp. 158Entact LLC 364Engineered Structures Inc. 283

FFagen Inc. 111FCI Constructors Inc. 186

FCL Builders LLC 395J.H. Findor & Son Inc. 247Flatiron Construction Corp. 47The Flintco Cos. Inc. 39Flournoy Construction Co.

LLC 388Fluor Corp. 2FNF Construction Inc. 263Forrester Construction Co. 192Foster Wheeler AG 10Frontier-Kemper Constructors

Inc. 391Fru-Con Holding Corp. 154

GGamma Construction Co. 361Garco Construction Inc. 243Garney Holding Co. 191Gemma Power Systems 245Gibbs Construction 399Gilbane Building Co. 19GLY Construction Inc. 182

Gohmann Asphalt and ConstructionInc. 373

Gotham Construction Co. LLC 148Graham Group US 213Granger Construction Co. 277Granite Construction Inc. 28Gray Construction 123Graycor 146

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. LLC 106

Grunley Construction Co. Inc. 187

H

H&M Co. Inc. 288The Hanover Co. 130B.L. Harbert International LLC 74Hardin Construction Co. LLC 201Harkins Builders Inc. 252

George Harms Construction Co.Inc. 386

Harper Construction Co. Inc. 241

Harper Industries Inc. 254David E. Harvey Builders Inc. 61Haskell 118

Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction 104Hawaiian Dredging Construction

Co. Inc. 176Hawkins Construction Co. 303Haydon Building Corp. 302Hensel Phelps Construction Co. 21Herzog Contracting Corp. 145

Hill & Wilkinson GeneralContractors 285

Hinkle Contracting Corp. 341HITT Contracting Inc. 59HK Systems Inc. 363Hoar Construction LLC 155Ho man Corp. 49Holder Construction Co. 37E.W. Howell Co. LLC 258The Hubbard Group 133Hunt Building Co. Ltd. 53Hunt Construction Group Inc. 26Hunter Contracting Co. 396

Hunter Roberts ConstructionGroup LLC 62

Hunzinger Construction Co. 371

IIHC Construction Cos. LLC 215IMC Construction 384Industrial Contractors Inc. 202Insitu orm Technologies Inc. 87INTECH Construction Inc. 298

Interstate Highway ConstructionInc. 314

JJacobs 7Jacobsen Construction Co. Inc. 124The Jaynes Cos. 175Joseph Jingoli & Son Inc. 126Joeris General Contractors

Ltd. 256GE Johnson Construction Co. 195Jones Lang LaSalle Construction

LP 339Jordan Construction 220W.M. Jordan Co. Inc. 140The Judlau Cos. 193

KM.B. Kahn Construction Co. Inc. 180

Kaiser Foundation HealthPlan Inc. 139

KBD Group 330

KBE Building Corp. 266KBR 3KBS Inc. 225Kenny Construction 81Key Construction Inc. 205Kiewit Corp. 4J.E. Kingham Construction Cos. 306Kinsley Construction Inc. 136


20/39


21/39

ENRs Complete 2010 Top List and Sourcebook Series:

ENR publishes nine Top Lists during the year where we rank different types of firms in the

construction industry based on construction revenue. These rankings are based on surveys wesend out three times a year. Here is the preliminary schedule for our surveys and Top Lists:

ENR Top Lists:

The Top 500 Design Firms April 19, 2010 Top 400 Contractors May 17, 2010 Top 200 Environmental Firms August 3 , 2010 Top Green Design Firms July 5, 2010 Top Green Contractors September 13, 2010 Top 100 Design-Build Firms June 7, 2010 Top 100 Construction Management Firms (Both At-Risk and For-Fee) June 7, 2010 Top 40 Program Management Firms June 14, 2010 Top 200 International Design Firms July 28, 2010 Top 225 International Contractors August 30, 2010 Top 600 Specialty Contractors October 11, 2010 Top 425 Owners November 8, 2010

ENR Sourcebooks:

The Top 500 Design Firms Sourcebook July 5, 2010 The Top 400 Contractors Sourcebook September 13, 2010 The Global Construction Sourcebook December 13, 2010

For complete information on top lists and how to participate, visit ENR.com
http://enr.construction.com/http://enr.construction.com/http://enr.construction.com/


22/39

Where the 2010 Top 400 Contractors Work by Country 1

A. NORTH AMERICA

CANADA Alberici Corp. AMEC ARCO/Murray Construction Cos. Bechtel

Black & Veatch Burns & McDonnellCB&I CH2M HILLCommercial Contracting GroupThe Dennis Engineering Group LLC Flatiron Construction Corp.Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AGFrontier-Kemper Constructors Inc.Graycor

HK Systems Inc. Insituform Technologies Inc. JacobsKBRKiewit Corp.Knutson Construction ServicesThe Lauren Corp.

Layne Christensen Co. Matrix Service Co. McDermott In ternational Inc. Michels Corp.ParsonsPCL Construction Enterprises Inc.Primoris Corp.

Railworks Corp. Remedial Construction Services LP

Roncelli Inc.Sevenson Environmental ServicesThe Shaw Group Inc.Shawmut Design and ConstructionTaggart GlobalURS Corp.WalbridgeWeston Solutions Inc.

J.J. White Inc.Willbros Group Inc.

B. LATIN AMERICA

ARGENTINA Black & VeatchCB&I CH2M HILLFluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

McDermott In ternational Inc.URS Corp.

BOLIVIAFluor Corp.URS Corp.

BRAZILThe Beck GroupCB&I Foster Wheeler AGKiewit Corp.

Layne Christensen Co. McDermott In ternational Inc.URS Corp.

CHILE BechtelCB&I Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. McDermott In ternational Inc.The Shaw Group Inc.

COLOMBIACB&I

Foster Wheeler AGKiewit Corp.

COSTA RICA BechtelThe Turner Corp.

ECUADORCB&I

EL SALVADORThe Shaw Group Inc.

HONDURAS American Bridge Co.Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. LLC Kiewit Corp.

MEXICO Alberici Corp. Barton Malow Co.The Beck Group

Black & VeatchCaddell Construction Co. Inc.CB&I CH2M HILLCommercial Contracting GroupFluor Corp.Frontier-Kemper Constructors Inc.

Haskell Insituform Technologies Inc. JacobsKBRKiewit Corp.

Layne Christensen Co. McDermott In ternational Inc. Roncelli Inc.The Turner Corp.URS Corp.


23/39


WalbridgeWeston Solutions Inc.

NICARAGUACB&I

Haskell

PANAMACaddell Construction Co. Inc.CB&I

PERU BechtelCB&I Fluor Corp.KBR

URUGUAYCB&I

VENEZUELA

CB&I Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AGKiewit Corp.

SURINAMECB&I

C. CARIBBEAN ISLANDS

GREATER ANTILLES Black & VeatchCB&I

Fluor Corp.KBRURS Corp.

PUERTO RICOCB&I CH2M HILLdck Worldwide LLC Fluor Corp.Gilbane Building Co.

JacobsKiewit Corp.The Shaw Group Inc.

Shiel Sexton Co. Inc.Torcon Inc.The Turner Corp.URS Corp.Weston Solutions Inc.

CUBACB&I dck Worldwide LLC

LESSER ANTILLES American Bridge Co.

BechtelCB&I dck Worldwide LLC Fluor Corp.Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. LLC

HaskellKiewit Corp.

McDermott In ternational Inc.PCL Construction Enterprises Inc.The Shaw Group Inc.The Turner Corp.Turner Industries Group LLC Vecellio Group Inc.Weeks Marine Inc.Wharton-Smith Inc .

D. EUROPE

ALBANIA BechtelFoster Wheeler AGURS Corp.KBRCB&I

Jacobs

AZERBAIJAN BechtelCB&I

McDermott In ternational Inc.The Turner Corp.URS Corp.

BELGIUM

Black & VeatchCB&I Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. Jacobs McDermott In ternational Inc.Weston Solutions Inc.

BULGARIA BechtelCB&I

CZECH REP.CB&I Insituform Technologies Inc. Jacobs

DENMARKFluor Corp.

McDermott In ternational Inc.

FINLANDCB&I Foster Wheeler AG


24/39


Jacobs

FRANCECB&I

Day & ZimmermannFoster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. Jacobs McDermott In ternational Inc.The Turner Corp.Weston Solutions Inc.

GEORGIA BechtelCB&I KBRKiewit Corp.The Turner Corp.

GERMANYCB&I

Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. JacobsKBR

McDermott In ternational Inc.The Shaw Group Inc.URS Corp.

GREECEFluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AGKBR

HUNGARYFoster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. JacobsKBRURS Corp.

IRELAND Black & VeatchFluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. JacobsKBRParsonsShiel Sexton Co. Inc.Structure ToneURS Corp.

ITALYCB&I Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

JacobsKiewit Corp.

McDermott In ternational Inc.The Shaw Group Inc.

LITHUANIAWeston Solutions Inc.

NETHERLANDS Black & VeatchCB&I Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. Jacobs McDermott In ternational Inc.

NORWAYCB&I Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

JacobsKBR


POLANDCB&I Fluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. JacobsKBRURS Corp.

PORTUGALCB&I

Foster Wheeler AG Insituform Technologies Inc.KBR

ROMANIA BechtelCB&I Foster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc.KBRKiewit Corp.URS Corp.

RUSSIA Bechtel Black & VeatchCB&I CH2M HILLFluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AGKBRKiewit Corp.The Turner Corp.URS Corp.

SLOVAKIA


25/39


CB&I Insituform Technologies Inc.

SPAINCB&I CH2M HILLFluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AG

Insituform Technologies Inc. JacobsKiewit Corp.The Shaw Group Inc.Weston Solutions Inc.

SWEDENCB&I Foster Wheeler AG

Jacobs

SWITZERLANDURS Corp.

UKRAINE Bechtel B.L. Harbert International LLC URS Corp.

UNITED KINGDOM AMEC Bechtel Black & VeatchCB&I CH2M HILLFluor Corp.

Foster Wheeler AG Insituform Technologies Inc. JacobsKBR

McDermott In ternational Inc. MWH Global Nova CorpThe Shaw Group Inc.Shawmut Design and ConstructionStructure ToneURS Corp.

YUGOSLAVIA (FORMER)KBR

BOSNIA & HERZ. Caddell Construction Co. Inc.KBR

CROATIA BechtelCB&I

FYR MACEDONIAKBR

SLOVENIA Jacobs

E. MIDDLE EAST

AFGHANISTAN Black & VeatchContrack International Inc.Fluor Corp.KBRThe Shaw Group Inc.URS Corp.Weston Solutions Inc.

BAHRAINContrack International Inc.Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. LLC

JacobsThe Shaw Group Inc.URS Corp.

CYPRUSFoster Wheeler AG

IRAQ AMEC Bechtel Black & Veatch Burns & McDonnellCDM CH2M HILLFluor Corp.Foster Wheeler AGKBR

The Shaw Group Inc.Tutor Perini Corp.URS Corp.Weston Solutions Inc.

ISRAEL Black & VeatchCH2M HILL

M+W U.S. McDermott In ternational Inc.

JORDANCDM

CH2M HILLContrack International Inc.KBRThe Turner Corp.

KUWAIT BechtelCB&I Fluor Corp.KBRParsonsThe Turner Corp.


26/39


27/39


28/39


CH2M HILL

TAIWAN (R.O.C.) Bechtel Black & VeatchCB&I CH2M HILLFoster Wheeler AGStructure ToneThe Turner Corp.URS Corp.Weston Solutions Inc.

THAILAND Bechtel Black & VeatchCB&I Foster Wheeler AGKiewit Corp.

TURKMENISTAN


UZBEKISTAN BechtelKBR

VIETNAM Bechtel Black & VeatchFoster Wheeler AGKBRKiewit Corp.


Structure ToneThe Turner Corp.

MONGOLIAFluor Corp.

G. NORTH AFRICA

ALGERIA Bechtel Berry, a division of Suffolk ConstructionFoster Wheeler AGKBR

Suffolk Construction Co. Inc.

EGYPT BechtelCB&I CH2M HILLContrack International Inc.KBRThe Turner Corp.

EGYPTURS Corp.

ETHIOPIA B.L. Harbert International LLC

LIBYA BechtelFoster Wheeler AG

MOROCCO JacobsThe Turner Corp.

SOMALIAThe Shaw Group Inc.

SUDAN B.L. Harbert International LLC

SUB SAHARA Layne Christensen Co.

TUNISIACB&I

H.. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN AFRICA

ANGOLA BechtelCB&a

ENR Top 400 Contracters

Documents

Transcript of ENR Top 400 Contracters