Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
-
Upload
cortesar-manu -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
1/23
ANSYS Elemente ec on
eLearning
Peter Barrett
October 2012
2012 CAE Associates Inc. and ANSYS Inc. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
2/23
ANSYS Element Selection
What is the best element type(s) for my analysis? Best Answer - It depends!
What is the oal of the anal sis?
Displacements, temperatures, mode shapes, nominal strength, fatigue life,stresses from fluid structure interaction, etc.
What are the shapes of my parts/assembly?
What types of symmetry can I take advantage of? Is it lon and slender where beams mi ht be useful?
Thin walled where Shell or Solid-Shell elements can be used?
Should I model the full assembly in one shot or use submodelingand/orsubstructuring?
What type of computational requirements are needed?
Linear vs. Nonlinear Static vs. D namic Time Domain vs. Fre . Domain?
2
The more complex the analysis, the fewer elements can be effectively solved
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
3/23
ANSYS V11 186 Elements Available!
Some Beam, Pipe,Spar, Shell, Solid
elements were removed
after this release.
Although undocumented
in the code but requireusers to have access toV11 help or older
3
.
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
4/23
ANSYS V14 166 Elements Available!
Note:any new eemen s
have been added sinceV11 including newsurface effect and
a vance pp ngelements
4
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
5/23
Element Types define the active DOF
The DOFs at a node are a function of the element type connected to thenode.
Be careful about the number of degrees of freedom generated in large
beam/shell models since 6 degrees of freedom are created at each node
3-D Spar (Pin Joints)UX, UY, UZ
3-D BeamUX, UY, UZ,
, ,
- 3-D Quadri lateral ShellUX, UY UX, UY, UZ,
ROTX, ROTY, ROTZ
3-D Thermal SolidTEMP
3-D Structural SolidUX, UY, UZ
5
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
6/23
Element Shape Function
. An element shape function is the shape of the results within the
element.
w w :
Linear or lower-order elements: Corner or end nodes only.
.
(Using enhanced strain for quad/brick shapes will adds extra shapes for bending)
Only allows straight sides. Curves are faceted.
Quadratic or hi her-order:
Corner or end nodes and mid-side nodes.
Assume a quadratic variation of DOFs within element.
Allows for modeling of curved boundaries
6
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
7/23
Guidelines for Element Selection in Meshing
Element Usage For curved surfaces use higher order
curved elements, especially forcontact problems
Quadrilateral elements are preferredover triangular elements, particularly
- .
For very large strain problems using
distortion
Avoid hi h as ect ratio of the element
1:9
May be1:3
Acceptable
1:1
Ideal
sides.
Need to also consider the gradient
excessive
7
across the element to determine the
accuracy of the response
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
8/23
Define Element Types
Beam Elements: Meshing of Line Bodies or Lines or through direct
node and element generation
Using a third node or orientation key point to orient
View /ESHAPE to check the X-sect orientation
Shell Elements:
Meshing of surface bodies / Areas
Element types controlled by assignment oradvanced mesh settings. Use consistent normals
Solid Element Midside Nodes:
Program controlled (default), dropped, or kept.
Element A Element B
8
Kept Dropped
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
9/23
Why Use Beam Elements?
Advantages:
as o sove, o ow eam eory, ess resu s a a, orces an momen sand linearized stresses directly available
Disadvantages:
anno accoun or oca s ress concen ra ons, ore cu o e ne, m e
to constant or linear tapered cross-sections Common Errors
-
Insufficient constraints when used in conjunction with shell and solid elements
9
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
10/23
Why Use Beam Elements?
Common Modeling Issues
: ape unc ons a ong e eng :
0 -- Linear (default) Recommend either 2 -- Quadratic or 3 -- Cubic (beam theory)
Mechanical defaults to Keyopt (3) = 2
The #of integration points in each cross section can greatly influence solution timeand results file size (Main Menu>Preprocessor>Sections>Beam>Common Sections >secdata)
For linear materials use a coarse cross-section mesh; to capture plasticity a refinedcross section mesh might be needed.
Model connections correctly (Fully fixed vs. pinned vs. partial moment release)
10
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
11/23
ANSYS Beam Elements Tips
Lower Order Beam Elements (188)
ec anca e au
Recommended for straight beams and for combined beam/shell models whenconnected to lower order shells and solids ( Shell 181, Solid185 etc)
Higher Order Beams (189) are recommended for curved geometry and forcombined meshes with higher order shells/solids
Mechanical
11
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
12/23
ANSYS Beam Elements Tips
spiders to spread the loading between bodies
Use MPC contact, Constraint Equations or spokes to distribute the load Spoke elements with lengths equal to half the member section is an preferred
.
12
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
13/23
Why 2-d or Axisymmetric Solid Elements? Advantages:
, ,
Disadvantages:
Creating the 2-d surface and correct orientation
-
Common Errors Not modeling @ z=0 with positive X for Radius
e ectng ncorrect ormuaton ane tress vs. . tran vs. xsymmetrc
13
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
14/23
Generalized Plane Strain
Generalized Plane Strain
A finite deformation domain length in the z direction (Z direction strain is notrequired to be zero)
Simulate 3-D deformations using 2-D options. Example Section of a cylinderor ong o y un er un orm emp. e omman s ,
GSGDATA, GSSOL,GSLIST)
14
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
15/23
Why Use Shell Elements?
Advantages: Faster to Solve, No length to thickness requirements, Less data created,
Forces and Moments easily obtained
Disadvantages:
Difficult to define contact, normal's and connections
Common Errors
Definin normal's inconsistentl
Postprocessing the wrong surface
15
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
16/23
Why Use Shell Elements?
Common Modeling Issues SHELL188: KEYOPT(3) Integration option:
0 -- Reduced integration with hourglass control (default)
2 -- Recommend Full integration with incompatible modes
Mechanical defaults to Shell 181 - Keyopt(3) = 2
Symmetry Boundary Conditions Make sure to also constrain the in-plane rotations for symmetric surfaces
urn arge e ec on n
For Pressure loads large deflection is often required since membrane stiffness is notaccounted for with small deflections
16
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
17/23
Shell Elements Tips
Lower Order Shell Elements (181) Mechanical Default
ecommen e or a o es an or com ne eams e mo e s w enconnected to lower order beams and solids ( Beam 188, Solid185 etc)
combined meshes with higher order beams/solids Use Mesh Details > Advanced Settings to Force Higher Order Shells (281) in
17
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
18/23
Solid Shell Elements
Mechanical.
Set the mesh method to Sweep.
.
Element Option: Solid Shell.
18
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
19/23
Why Use Solid Shell Elements?
Advantages:
Faster to Solve, No length to thickness requirements, Thickness defined bygeometry, Auto Contact generation available, Easy transition to standard 3-delements, Automatically creates tapered elements
:
Sweepable Geometry and correct Element Orientation required Common Errors
Defining normal's inconsistently. Thin Section must be in element Z direction
Common Modeling Issues
Lower Order Elements require refined mesh to modal small radii geometry Meshing of complex geometry can be difficult
19
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
20/23
Why Use Solid Elements?
Advantages:
Easy to Model, Provides 3-d geometry with results, Can include stressconcentrations
Disadvantages:
Computationally expensive, For thin and slender bodies may require excessive
element count
Common Errors
Using Singular results stresses at sharp corners, fixed supports, point loads
Common Modeling Issues
SOLID185 (Lower Order Brick): KEYOPT(3) Element technolo :
0 -- Full integration with B-BAR method (default)
1 -- Uniform reduced integration with hourglass control
2 -- Enhanced strain formulation Recommended for Bending Problems
3 -- Simplified enhanced strain formulation Mechanical defaults to Keyopt (3) = 0 when midside nodes are dropped
20
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
21/23
ANSYS Mechanical Mixed Order Meshing
Solid186Solid185
Solid186Brick w/dropped
midnodes Solid186
Solid186Brick w/dropped
midnodes
Pyramid
Solid187
rc Solid186Pyramid
Solid187
Tet e
Edges ofMeshedVolumes
Nodes
21
Elements (Side view of 1 row of elements from model above)
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
22/23
Contact Elements
Contact Element Types
2D Surface-to-Surface
Plane Stress, Strain,Axisymmetric Elements
.
3D Surface-to-Surface Shell, Solid,-shell, SolidElements
Rigid or Flex. Bodies
Point-to-Surface
Beams to shells or solids Line-to-Line
Beam-to-Beam
Bending or solid-to-
Line-to-Surface
Beam or Shell edge toSolid
22
Node-to-Node
Specialty elements
-
7/30/2019 Element_Selection_CAEA[1].pdf
23/23
Specialty Elements
Lumped Mass - Mass21
Keyoptdefines DOF (6 by default)
Set Keyopt3=2 to reduce DOF ifrotatry interia is not required
Make sure to s ecif Mass in all threedirections
Multi-Point Constraint - MPC184 Link, Slider, Revolute, Universal, Slot,
- - , , , ,Spherical, Screw, etc.
Large deflection response
Automated Generation in WB
Bolt Pretension PRETS179
Small deflection Only
Use MPC184 or contact surface offset
Spring - (Dashpot) Elements
Combin14, 37, 39, 40, 214
Original Spring Elements
23
Combin214
Unsymmetrical Stiffness/Damping