Elections 2.0 Part 1 of 2_civic
-
Upload
hicock2010 -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
524 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Elections 2.0 Part 1 of 2_civic
SOCIAL MEDIA, RESEARCH & COMMUNICATIONS
Elections 2.0Part 1: Insights from the Nenshi Campaign
Part 2: Implications for 2011 Federal Election
Presented by Brian F. Singh, ZINC Research
Market Research & Intelligence AssociationApril 7, 2011
SOCIAL MEDIA, RESEARCH & COMMUNICATIONS
Elections 2.0Part 1:
Insights from the Nenshi Campaign
Why does this matter?
The Dynamics of Elections are ChangingEvolution. Leadership. Engagement.
Innovation. Mobilization.
Marketing Research & Polling are Changing.
Don Braid, Calgary Herald; October 19 2010
“One of the most entertaining parts of the campaign, in fact, was watching the old pols — the people so used to getting the leaders elected — looking over their shoulders with growing dread. They wondered, what the hell is this chaotic, uncontrollable thing thundering up the track?”
Nenshi: “All the chops… and relentless.”
• Champion Debater• Student Council President• Management Consultant• Academic/Professor• Author• Journalist/Media• Chair – Arts Organization• TEDx Speaker• Plan-It Calgary• Mayoral Candidate…
The Team…
• Nenshi leadership & design: “Established Parameters.”
• Some political experience.• But… trusted network with…
Proven performers/ Specialized skills. Independent thinkers, but collaborative. “Start-up & Launch.” Media literacy – traditional & Web-based
Google docs/tools Cloud-based communication/collaboration Twitter
• FACT: All active on Twitter – Before & AFTER the Campaign.
Myth: This was easy.
• False. Candidate & Team worked tirelessly off!• Used everything available…
Events, Debates, Coffee Parties. Relationship building/Management. Communications: Social Media/Web. Public/Media Relations. Technical: Statistics, Network theory, Game theory, Semiotics. Voter Identification.
• Rhythm of a Campaign… from awareness to election day.
The Problem: Who is Nenshi?
• No awareness nor familiarity.• No money.• McIver’s “war chest” & perceived “in-waiting.”• The Entry of Higgins.
A Unique Opportunity…• Timing, Scale & Geography• Strategy, Tactics & Execution
The ApproachWhat Social Media Facilitated…
• Be different.• Redefine the rules.• Intelligence-/Data-driven.• Innovation.• One step ahead.• Go to the people… wherever they are.• Seed “Advocates:” Create base to talk
among themselves.
Foundation Strategy+
Improvisation & Co-creation.
What does this have anything to do with an election?
CARS? HOCKEY?SKYSCRAPERS?
Initial Strategy: Connect with the Hyper-Engaged
The Strategy
• Phase 1: Awareness & Own Online.• Phase 2: Brand (Stand out/Differentiate)• Phase 3: Leadership.• “The Event”
The Strategy
• Phase 1: Awareness & Own Online.• Phase 2: Brand (Stand out/Differentiate)• Phase 3: Leadership.• “The Event”
* During Phase 2, “Mass Action” stimulated *
The Process of Research & Strategy
CAMPAIGN STRATEGY
“The Bridge:” Social Media & Canadians
Study
Social Media Monitoring
Web Analytics
Engagement Metrics
PUBLIC OPINION POLLING (Population Reflective)
Social Media Monitoring
Sentiment Analysis
Web Analytics
Media Monitoring
Voter Identification/ Geo-Demographic
Targeting
Volunteer Feedback
Data Intensive Approach. REALLY INTENSIVE.
• Data = Measurement = Performance.• Everything was measured:
Social Media/Web Campaign Tracking Voter Identification Polling & Polling Analysis Sentiment Analysis (Blogs, Print/Electronic Media, Discussion
boards) Volunteer feedback
• Everything fed back into & refined strategy.• Core measurement: Return on Engagement.
Myth: “Social Media Candidate”
• Integrated & Innovative Communications.• Social media was a tool – BUT used it better
than everybody.• Most other elements of campaign were
traditional, but social media supported these efforts.
• Grasped media/engagement efficiencies.
• Experts dismissed & Other Candidates did not react: Cannot grasp what you don’t understand.
Survey: Social Media & Engagement.“Media Literacy”
Engagement Phase Factor Factor Composition Revealed Rank
Awareness(10 groupings)
“Social Media” YouTube, Facebook/Facebook Fan Page, Mobile/Web App 3rd
“Online Resources” Search Engine; Candidate Website; Blogs/Online Opinions. 5th
Research(9 groupings)
“Social Media/Direct Electronic-Mobile”
Twitter; YouTube; Facebook/Facebook Fan Page; Mobile Web/Application; Candidate Electronic/e-mail Newsletter.
2nd
“Involved Opinions”Getting Involved in Campaign; Debate/Open Forum; Blogs/Online Opinions.
5th
Decision(9 groupings)
“Twitter/Facebook/ Mobile Web”
Twitter; Mobile Web/Application; Facebook/Facebook Fan Page. 2nd
“YouTube/Blogs” YouTube; Blogs/Online Opinions. 8th
Campaigns & Communications 2.0
• Speed of Production & Transmission: Less than 1 minute.
• Media expectations: On-demand Access. Anywhere, Anytime, Any Channel.
• Preparation: Contacts, Access, Willingness, Response Times and CONTENT.
• Diversity – Vehicles & Population
• But also… Candidate Advocates (3rd Party).
The Speed of the Web… September 28, 2010
The Speed of the Web… September 28, 2010
Manage Reputation.
Case Study: Measurement - 3 Pillars Video
Source: http://www.chaordix.com/blog/2010/10/13/crowdsourced-nenshi-video/#more-1637
How did we know it was working?DIY & Empowerment…
Turning our attention to the 2011 Federal Election…
To be continued in Part 2….