Draft GWP Operational Strategy on Water and Food Security - CP meeting 2011 - Day 2
-
Upload
global-water-partnership -
Category
Technology
-
view
213 -
download
2
Transcript of Draft GWP Operational Strategy on Water and Food Security - CP meeting 2011 - Day 2
draft - Operational Strategy on Water and Food Security
Consulting Partners Meeting
19 August 2011
Stockholm
GWP Strategy:
“our results framework”
how we create and deliver value in achieving our vision
2
GWP visionWater security
A key contributor to sustainable socio-economic
well-being and national development
Goal 3Reinforce knowledge sharing and
communicationsRaising awareness, creating and
disseminating knowledge, and building capacity
Goal 2Address critical
development challengesDevelop and advocate
solutions to help governments take better decisions to
improve resilience
Goal 4Build a more effective network
Government, civil society and the private sector strengthen the
partnership to improve governance and sustainable funding
Goal 1Promote water as a key part of
sustainable national developmentGovernments make water
resources management a top priority and invest in its
development
GWP Strategy:
Mission:…to support the sustainable development and management of water resources at all levels
Strategic Goals
Strategic Elements
Vision and Mission
1.1
Impr
ovin
g su
ppor
t for
w
ater
man
agem
ent t
hrou
gh
natio
nal p
roce
sses
1.2
Impr
ovin
g go
vern
ance
sy
stem
s 1.
3 Im
prov
ing
wat
er
infr
astr
uctu
re 1.
4 Im
prov
ing
finan
cing
for
wat
er m
anag
emen
t 1.
5 F
acili
tatin
g tr
ansb
ound
ary
coop
erat
ion
1.6
Mon
itorin
g pr
ogre
ss o
n IW
RM
2.1
Ada
ptin
g to
clim
ate
chan
ge 2.
2 A
chie
ving
food
sec
urity
2.3
Tac
klin
g ur
bani
satio
n (in
clud
ing
wat
er s
uppl
y an
d sa
nita
tion
) 2.
4 R
esol
ving
con
flict
4.1
Par
tner
ship
and
al
lianc
e bu
ildin
g 4.
2 G
WP
per
form
ance
m
easu
rmen
t 4.
3 G
WP
fina
ncia
l su
stai
nabi
lity
4.4
Sup
port
ing
the
GW
P
netw
ork
3.1
Impr
ovin
g co
mm
unic
atio
ns c
apac
ity 3.
2 Im
prov
ing
GW
P
outr
each
3.3
Str
engt
heni
ng G
WP
kn
owle
dge
shar
ing
Goal 1:Promote water as a key part of
sustainable national development
Goal 2:Address critical development
challenges
Goal 3:Reinforce knowledge sharing and
communications
Goal 4:Build a more effective network
1a: Incorporate existing policies/plans into national development and implement
1b: Develop/strengthen weak/non-existant policies/plans in national development and implement
1c: Multi-stakeholder involvement in building local capacity and implementing policies/plans
2a: Take into account the links between water and climate change and develop solutions for adaptation
2b: Address critical development challenges, particularly food security, urbanisation and conflict resolution
2c: Objective and incisive intellectual contributions from GWP and its partners
3a: Knowledge dissemination to global entities and the corporate world
3b: Stakeholders have better access to relevant and practicalknowledge and capacity to share
3c: Communications culture embedded across the Partnership and stakeholderstake up strategic information and messages
4a: Strengthen the capacity of RWPs sot hey are more effective, and provide support to the CWPs
4b: GWPO and RWPs improve organisation, management and governance
4c: GWPO, RWPsand CWPs access new and diverse funding and increase traditional funding sources
Vision:…a water secure world
OutcomeChallenges
3.4
Str
ateg
ic m
essa
ges
Activities, outputsand budgets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
Act
iviti
es, o
utpu
ts
and
budg
ets
3
What is an “operational strategy”?
1. How we implement our Strategy in achieving food security?
what did we, in 2008 say we would do?
2. How we build on our strengths to address our strategic challenges?
3. How we take advantage of the opportunities – in working with others?
4. How we carve out our “niche”?
4
Achieving Food Security:what did we say in 2008 we would do?
• “GWP will work with the CGIAR system, particularly with the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) to facilitate adoption of the recommendations emerging from the Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture and the Challenge Programme on Water and Food (2007).”
5
What does the Comprehensive Assessment say?
• “…there is enough land, water, and human capacity to produce food for a growing population over the next 50 years…
• …IF we act NOW to improve water use and management in agriculture…”
• CA recommends 8 policy actions… • http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/assessment/
6
CA’s Recommended Policy Actions:1. Change the way we think about water and agriculture
2. Fight poverty by improving access to agricultural water and its use
3. Manage agriculture to enhance ecosystem services
4. Increase the productivity of water
5. Upgrade rainfed systems – a little water can go a long way
6. Adapt yesterday’s irrigation to tomorrow’s needs
7. Reform the reform process – targeting institutions
8. Deal with tradeoffs and make difficult choices
7
What are the “opportunities”?• Policy actions are already identified ref. the Comprehensive Assessment!!• Recognition that integrated approaches
(i.e. IWRM) are in fact the “best” way to manage water and related resources – to address the water-food-energy nexus
• The strengths of key allies: working together to create synergies: 1 + 1 = more than 2!
8
What are the “opportunities”?
• The challenge of food production in a world with increasing population constrained by limited land and freshwater resources
• Recognition that existing hierarchical business models have limitations in delivering results – GWP is unique
9
What are our “strengths”?• GWP is a ”Network” - not a hierarchy:
– voluntary association – working together on the basis of a social contract our “core values”
– fluid and organic not always easily predictable
– informal structuring of relationships to share knowledge and information
– we can do things other organisations cannot
10
What are our “strengths”?
• GWP has a ”neutral platform”– our ability to bring multiple, sometimes
competing, sectors together• Global and regional technical leadership:
– Technical Committee– GWP ToolBox– Regional knowledge platforms
11
Possible activities and outcomes:
1. Policy processes strengthening the links between water and land management though IWRM strategies and plans decision-making processes
12
Possible activities and outcomes:
2. Advocacy the CA talks about “changing the way we think about water and agriculture”…. GWP advocates integrated – IWRM - processes
13
Possible activities and outcomes:
3. Linking research to application:
e.g. synergies with the CGIAR CRP5 on water, land and ecosystems.
14
Possible activities and outcomes:
4. Financing promoting IWRM strategies and plans to “set the stage” for investments by IFIs (e.g. World Bank, IFAD, etc.) and others in national and regional water management and development activities
15
Possible activities and outcomes:
5. Linking food security and climate change adaptation: investments in land and water
management and development…are ‘no regrets’ investments that also
increase resilience to climatic variability
16
Win-win opportunities with key allies:
• How can we build on our “strengths” and those of our key allies–and develop “synergies”?
• Help us to carve out our ”niche” together in “achieving food security”!
17