Doctor of PhilO~

283
RECOMBINATIONAL ANO PACKAGING SIGNALS IN HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS ( , ACID by SUSANNAH' LOUISE VAIj,MUZA, BSc., MSc. A Thesis . Sub.itted to the School of Graduate in Partial Fulfil.ent of the for the Degree Doctor of June, 19B5 ©

Transcript of Doctor of PhilO~

Page 1: Doctor of PhilO~

RECOMBINATIONAL ANO PACKAGING SIGNALS

IN

HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS

(

,

DEOXYRIBONU~LEIC ACID

by

SUSANNAH' LOUISE VAIj,MUZA, BSc., MSc.

A Thesis~ .

Sub.itted to the School of Graduate ~tudies

in Partial Fulfil.ent of the Require.ent~

for the Degree

Doctor of PhilO~

June, 19B5 ©

Page 2: Doctor of PhilO~

\.

\')

.,

RECOMBINATION AND PACKAGING OF HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS DNA

(

-r .

Page 3: Doctor of PhilO~

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (1985)

(Medical Sciences)

McMASTER UNIVERSITY

Hamilton, Ontario

TITLE: Recombinational and Packaging Signals in Herpes Simplex Virus

~eoxyribonucleic Acid

AUTHOR: Susannah Louise Var~uza B.Sc. IMcMaster University)

M.Sc. IMcMaster Universityl

SUPERVISOR Dr. J.R. Smiley

NUMBER OF PAGES: x iv, 267

"

( i i )

Page 4: Doctor of PhilO~

ABSTRACT

H~rpes Si.pl~x Virus DNA displiYs i number of unusual(

features which

r--

Ihave been the subj~ct of intense scrutiny in a number of laboratories.

The genole is cOlposed of two segments, each of which IS flanked by

inverted repeats. These seglents invert freely with respect to each

other generating equilolir qUintities of faur different isolers. This

phenolenon, called s~g.ent inversion, WiS reput~d to be the result //

site specific recomhinition lechanisl operating on the terlinir-;;peat,

the 'i' cequence, which is part of the inverted repeits flanking each

seglent. The 'a' sequence/was also ilplicated is the cleavage~packaging

signil utilized by the .vlrus to process viral DNA concatelers. The

underlying lechanisl of this pr~cess was believed to be a double strand

break it i sp~ciflc site ~~i!!~~a ho 'a' sequences. The- lodels of. HSV

laturitlon w~r~ deflcl~nt, however, in explaining several phenolena,

nal~ly the tendency of the 'i' sequence to accululate tandem iterations

of Itself, the isy••etric distribution of these tandem iterations to one

end of the geno.e, but not to the other, and the ibility of defective

geno.es, 'which do not have tinde.ly iterited 'a' sequences, at least

"..J

initiilly, to be efficiently packaged. have shown that the "a"

sequence actuilly contains two signals for cleavage/packaging, not one,

that the cleivage occurs it specific distances ~rol these signals, not

In specific sequences, and that the cleavage mechanism results in a

duplicition of the cleavage signal and flinking DNA~ Furthermore, I have

deter.ined that the 'a' sequence is aei i target for site specific

recombination, and thit therp !~ better evidence to support the idea

(Ii i )o

Page 5: Doctor of PhilO~

that legment inYer~ion il acco.plilhed by a nu.ber of related, but

independent mechanis.l, including generalized reco.bination.

(j Y)

Page 6: Doctor of PhilO~

Sacchetti for lending me her excellent

Acknowledgements

This work is the distillation at many hours at stimulating conversation,

.shared ideas, disappointing ~ailures, and soaring triumphs. For much at

this owe a debt of gratitude to my sURervisor, Jim Smiley. His

critical appraisal has been ·invaluable. Thanks are also due to Silvia------,

editorial~ skills. To my

~ colleagues whose unqualified moral support helped me aver the rough

spats - Marnie Halpern and Eddy Littler in particular - I offer thanks

with gratitude and aftection. Finally, wards are inadequate to express

my debt to my husband, Petr Varmuza, whose boundless patience and sense

at humour have been the staying torces in ~y life •

.

I

(v)

Page 7: Doctor of PhilO~

This Thesis is Dedicated

to the Memory of

my stepfather

Samuel Burke

(vi)

Page 8: Doctor of PhilO~

"

, .

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

Recombination

Recombination During Meiolis and Mitosis in Eucaryotes. .Recombination in Procaryotes

Site Specific Recombination

Bacteriophage Recombination Systems

Special Recombination Mechanisms

Herpes Simple, Virus

General.,

Structure of HSV DNA

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

Gene Conversion and/or Recombination ,in the "c" Inverted

Repeats

Sequence Identity of "a" Is Not Obligatory

Sequence Analyssis of the KOS Joint

Analysis of the Packaging Signal in Smal F

Recombinational Signals in Sma I F

Sequence Analysis of JK Termini

Sequence and Restriction Analysis of TK Stepladder

Cis-Acting Site Specific Recombination Signals Do Not

Map Within "a"

(v i i )

,

,

2

B

10

12

16

19

20

52

73

88

122

136

153

163

,.

182

Page 9: Doctor of PhilO~

DISCUSSION.'

"

~

Conclusions Drawn From This Work

Sequence Iden-tity of the Inverted "c" Repeats is not

Obligatory

•Heterologous "a" Se~uences Are Tolerated

No Site Specifying a Cis Acting Signal for SIte Specific

Recombination Maps Within the "a" Sequence

192

193

195

197

Both T~rmirii of Defec!ive Genomes Contain "a" Sequences 199

The Cleavage Signal Sequence Resides Within a Subfragment

of. ·"a" Which .Does Not Con·tain the Cleavage Site\

Cleavage Occurs at a Specific Distance from the Cleavage

Signal

200

201

There are Probably Two Cleavage Signals

The "." Sequence Amplification is a Direct Consequence

of the CJeavage Reaction

Intermolecular Ligation May Occur in HSV DNA

Models For Cleavage/Packaging of HSV DNA

l 202

203

204

Old Data 206

Model 207

Model II 210

Asymmetric Distribution of Tandem "a" Sequ~nces 211

3'OH Protruding Ends on Viral DNA 216

"a" S~quence Stereotypic Amplification and Reduction 218

Multiple Cleavage Signals in HSV and Other Herpesviruses 222/

Relationship Between Cleavage M~chanisms and Segment Inversion 226

(v iii)

Page 10: Doctor of PhilO~

Ta~le of Contents ecntd.

APPENDIX - PLASMID MAPS

REFERENCES'

,..

(i x)

)

231

258

Page 11: Doctor of PhilO~

~

• LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

~erpes Simple, VlrUS

'Herpes Simple, Virus Type 1

Herpes Simplex Virus Typ e Strain KOS

Herpes Simplex Virus Type Strain KOS.

Herpes Simplex Virus Type Strain F

Herpes Simplex Virus Type ·1 Strain 17

Herpes Simplex Virus Type I Strain USA-B•

Herpes Simplex Virus Type

Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2

Human Cytomegal ovi rus

Epstein-Barr Virus

Varicella Z~ster Virus

Simian Virus 40

Thymidine Kinase'I,

Thymidine Kinase Deficient

Adenosine triphosphate

Deoxyguanosine monophosphate

Deoxyadenosine monophosphate

Deoxythymidine monophosphate,

De_oJlycytoslne monophosphate

base pair

kilobase pair (bp x 103)

kilobase pair

kilodalton

(x)

Strain Justin

.;:- ...

)

Page 12: Doctor of PhilO~

Abbreviatioos contd.

MOl

pfu

32p

DNA

Multiplicity of Infection

plaque forming unit

radioisotopic phosphorus

Deoxyribonucle~c Acid

. .

(x i )

"

~.

~.

..

Page 13: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 14: Doctor of PhilO~

.-

List of Figures and Tables contd.

Fig. 24: KOS joint sequence

Fig. 25: Map of Test Fragments

Fig. 26: Blot of. Defective DNA

Fig. 27: pcaDI Map

Fig. 2B: Blot of caDI Defectives

Fig. 29: Marker Rescue Screening Gel

Fig. 30: PvuII, EcoRI Digests of Insertion Mutant Viruses

Fig. 31: Pvu[I, Sma I Digests of KOSF10, TK blot

Fig. 32: Two Models of. "a" Sequence Amplification

Fig. 33: Smal Digest KOSF10, Smal F blot

Fig. 34: MaR of KOSF10 insert

Fig. 35: pTKLl3 Sequence Gels

'.Fig. 36: Sequences pTKLl3, pRIS3, pSBFI4

Fig. 37: pRIS3 Sequence Gels

Fig. 3B: Colony Hybridization

Fig. 3~: fstI, PstI/SmaI, and BamHI Digests Cloned Second Steps

Fig. 40: Maps of pRIaa6, pRlaa3, and pRIaa35

Table 2: Rest~iction Analysis of Second Step Clones

Fig. 41: Sequence Gels pRlaa6 BamHI Fragment, 5' and 3' TK

Fig. 42: Sequence Gels pRIaa6 SstI I Fra,9ment

Fig. 43: Sequence Gels pRIaa6 and pRlaa3 Sstll Fragments

Fig. 44: Sequences of pRlaa6 and pRlaa3

Fig. 45: Sequencing Strategy and Results-Table 3: Restriction Analysis of KOSFIO and KOSA23

(xiii)

121

125

129

132

134

, 139

14 1

144

147

149

151

159

162

166

16B

171

172

175

177

179

181

184

187

'~.

\,

Page 15: Doctor of PhilO~

list 0/ Figures and Tables contd.

Fig. 46: Deletions Produce Segments Without Origins

Fig. 47: Cleavage/Packaging Models I and I I

Fig. 48: Models of Asymmetric Distribution 0/ II a II

---,-Fig. 49: Clonal Analysis of KOSF10

Fig. 50: Terminal Sequences From Various Herpesviruses

((x i v)

\

190

209

214

220

224

,

r

..

Page 16: Doctor of PhilO~

INTROOUCT~~/

When Gregor Mendel's brilliant insights emerged from obscurity

at the beginning of this century, bi?logy moved firmly Into the

scientifIc realm. The mechanIsm of heredity could be seen as a process

that obeyed Newtonian-like laws, and could therefore be studIed with

scientific approaches based on experimentation of cause and effect.

The r.pid expansion of knowledge in the field of molecular

biology has produced a set of fairly flexible rules by which most

organisms seem to conduct their inner affairs. say flexible because

for every "rule" there are usually exceptions of one form or another

(Nature is something of an opportunist). Indeed, even Mendel, whose

~"~Manded too perfect by some (Whitehouse, 1977),

apparently fai ed to make observation of one basic' feature of heredIty

•which may eventually hold the key to an understandIng of larger

experIments

mysterIes such as evolution. That feature is the ordered linkage of

genes within a chromosome. It was discovered by early geneticists

attempting to repeat Mendel's experiments wIth other organisms and

expanded lIbraries of 'characters" or genes. Even after linkage was

established as a general feature of heredity, however, exceptions ~gain

were found toethe new' "rule'. These were discovered to be the result of

a fairly ubi~uitous process, known as recombination, in which alleles

of different genes appeared to move from one chromosome to another.

This ability of genetic material to ~ove around and stIll maintaIn -

_ I

Page 17: Doctor of PhilO~

2

order has fasCInated genetICIsts for decades. In:- the process of~.

unravelling the mysterIes of genetIc re.comb.i~ation,,,;jnvestigators have

discovered some amazing tricks devise~Jy natu~e to preserve and expand

genetic inffrmation.

B~SQm~lQ~~i~Q j •

B~sQm~iQ~~iQQ ~~~iQg ~~iQ!i! ~Q~ ~i~Q!i! lQ ~~S~~YQ~~!'

Mendel '5 experf;ents measured the random assortment of unl inked

genes during sexual reproductio~. Later work showed that the fre~uency

of co-segregation of two lInked markers reflected (inversely) the

distance between them; close markers frequently segregated together,

while distant markers segregated separately. This property allowed

geneticists to order, or map, different genes along a chromosome. Thus,

recombination became a tool as well as a phenomenon:

Sexually reproducing org~nisms recombine their chromosomes

during meiosis. This allows even greater mi.ing of genetic material

than that afforded by rando. assort~ent of chromosomes, presumably to

ensure variation within the population as a hedge against genetic

catastrophe. Recombination is believed to occur at an early stage of

meiosis, after DNA replication. The chromosomes form a structure called

a "synaptonemal complex" characterized by the synapsis of homologous

chromosomes along a po'lymeric protein backb9ne. Shortly after it .is

formed, chiasmata can be observed at various sites along the paIred

chromosomes. Chiasmata have been positively correlated WIth chromosome

cross-overs and with recombination frequency. For example, male

Drosophila and the anthers of Frltillaria Japonlca do not exhIbit

,1

Page 18: Doctor of PhilO~

chlasmata during melOSlS and do not recombIne theIr genes ICatcheslde,

1977; Henderson, 1970).

Nature has klndby supplied geneticists with wonderful tools to

study recombination in the form of fungi and yeasts. These organisms

retain the property of independent growth of both haploid and diploId

forms, although in some fungi the diploid stage is s~rt and highly

specialized. Moreover, in some fungi, the meiotic products (the spores)

_are conveniently ordered in the ascus according to the planes of

division of the original precursor cell. Many fungi undergo a

post-meiotic mitosis, yielding 8 spores from-a. single diploid cell. The

eight spores are thus analogous to the eight strands of DNA within the

interacting chromosomes at the diplotene stage of meiosis during which

chiasmata form, and, by deductive re~soning, .durlng which recombInation

takes place. ThlS allows the Investigator to follow the fate of all the

participating chromatids during meiosis (reviewed in Catcheside, 1977;

St ah 1 , 1979). This is an important concept in the study "of

recombination because it ensures an "unbiased" sampling of the

population. Analysis of ascospores, referred to in the trade as tetrad

analysis, has provided biology with some basic ground rules of the

behaviour ·of recombining chromosomes. First, distant markers almost

always recombine reciprocally, ie. there is no net loss of genetic

material during recombination, only rearrangement. Second, this rule

does not apply to very close markers. Tetrad analysis of ordered asci

from Neurospora crassa and Sordaria fimicola occasionally yields

ascospores with asymmetrically distributed genes. These are referred to

as 116:2 11" "5:3", and lla.berrant 4:4" tetrads, and were originally

Page 19: Doctor of PhilO~

4

dIscovered durIng tetrad analySIS of spores produced by a cross of two

different straIns of Neurospora which dIffered at a locus defining

spore colour. Most ascospores contained 4 coloured (wild type - wt):4

colourless (mutant - m) spores, indicating that no rearrangement of the

spore colour gene with respect to the centromere occurred. Some con-

tal ned 2 wt:2 m:2 wt:2m spores, indicating that the spore colour gene

had been exchanged between the two internal chromatids. The beauty of

ordered asci is that the products reflect exchanges between individual

chromatids within the division plane. Thus, a 2:4:2 arrangement

reflects recombination between non-adjacent chromatids withIn the

division plane. Rare ascopores with' 6:2 (or 2:6) and 5:3 (or 3.5)

arrangements were also detected. These asci were interpreted as the

result of nonreciprocal exchange of genetIc informatIon within the

spore colour locus. The best mechanistic explanation of the phenomenon

so far is the repair of mismatched heterodupleles formed during r~eom-

bination, or, gene conversion.

The observation

patterns exhibited by

of gene

~fferent

conversion

organisms,

durIng meiosIs, and the

allowed investigators to

inf~r mechanisms of recombination which encompassed this unusual, trait.

All of these models begin with the assumptIon that gene conversion is a

consequence of the mechanism employed by the cell to recombine its

chromosomes. This interpretation is based on the observation that

approximately 50X of the time conversion is assoc~ated with recombin­

ation of £~~Q~iQg ~~~~~~§.

Models of recombination are themselves subject to evolution, as

data from different organisms becomes avaIlable. The first widely known

Page 20: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 21: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 22: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 23: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 24: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 25: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 26: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 27: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 28: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 29: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 30: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 31: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 32: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 33: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 34: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 35: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 36: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 37: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 38: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 39: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 40: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 41: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 42: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 43: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 44: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 45: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 46: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 47: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 48: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 49: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 50: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 51: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 52: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 53: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 54: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 55: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 56: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 57: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 58: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 59: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 60: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 61: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 62: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 63: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 64: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 65: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 66: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 67: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 68: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 69: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 70: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 71: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 72: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 73: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 74: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 75: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 76: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 77: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 78: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 79: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 80: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 81: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 82: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 83: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 84: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 85: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 86: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 87: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 88: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 89: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 90: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 91: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 92: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 93: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 94: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 95: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 96: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 97: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 98: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 99: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 100: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 101: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 102: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 103: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 104: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 105: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 106: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 107: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 108: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 109: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 110: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 111: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 112: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 113: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 114: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 115: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 116: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 117: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 118: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 119: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 120: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 121: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 122: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 123: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 124: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 125: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 126: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 127: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 128: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 129: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 130: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 131: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 132: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 133: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 134: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 135: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 136: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 137: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 138: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 139: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 140: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 141: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 142: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 143: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 144: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 145: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 146: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 147: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 148: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 149: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 150: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 151: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 152: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 153: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 154: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 155: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 156: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 157: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 158: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 159: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 160: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 161: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 162: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 163: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 164: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 165: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 166: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 167: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 168: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 169: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 170: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 171: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 172: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 173: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 174: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 175: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 176: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 177: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 178: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 179: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 180: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 181: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 182: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 183: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 184: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 185: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 186: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 187: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 188: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 189: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 190: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 191: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 192: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 193: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 194: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 195: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 196: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 197: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 198: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 199: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 200: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 201: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 202: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 203: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 204: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 205: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 206: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 207: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 208: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 209: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 210: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 211: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 212: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 213: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 214: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 215: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 216: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 217: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 218: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 219: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 220: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 221: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 222: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 223: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 224: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 225: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 226: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 227: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 228: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 229: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 230: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 231: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 232: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 233: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 234: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 235: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 236: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 237: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 238: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 239: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 240: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 241: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 242: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 243: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 244: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 245: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 246: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 247: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 248: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 249: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 250: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 251: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 252: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 253: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 254: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 255: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 256: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 257: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 258: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 259: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 260: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 261: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 262: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 263: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 264: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 265: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 266: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 267: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 268: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 269: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 270: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 271: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 272: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 273: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 274: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 275: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 276: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 277: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 278: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 279: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 280: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 281: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 282: Doctor of PhilO~
Page 283: Doctor of PhilO~