Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

download Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

of 34

Transcript of Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    1/34

    Stress Analysis using 3DEC

    A case Study

    Dr. R. Venugopala RaoScientist & Head

    Numerical Modeling

    National Institute of Rock Mechanics

    Kolar Gold Fields - 56 !!"

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    2/34

    Stress Analysis and Design ofUG Powerhouse using

    Discontinuum Modeling

    Introduction

    #$%ectie

    'escri(tion of the )ro$lem

    Geolog* and Rock Mass +lassification

    +om(utational Model

    Results and 'iscussion

    ,ack nal*sis & Su((ort .aluation

    Summar* and +onclusions

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    3/34

    Objective

    State of stresses around the e/caations

    'is(lacement distri$ution

    ./tent of failure 0ones

    Interaction of multi(le e/caations

    'esign of su((ort s*stem

    .fficac* of Su((ort S*stem through ,ack

    nal*sis

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    4/34

    Description of the Problem

    Machine Hall 206x20.4x45.5m

    Transformer Hall 191x16x24mPS Manifolds 4.5x5.5m, 6x6m

    Passage Dc!s ".1x"m, 4.6x5.5m

    #s Dc!s 11x".5mT$T Manifolds 6.6x"m

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    5/34

    Geology and oc!mass"lassi#cation

    1 ranges from !234 to !2"

    5 discontinuities

    * Joint Sets cutting the powerhouse crown at Y=538.5 X=109.5

    jset dip Aount dd !irection org "

    # $ spacing eters nu

    * !ip !irection with respect to %owerhouse A"is

    jset dip &5 dd 11' org 109.5 538.5 &'

    spacing ' nu 3

    Insitu Stresses

    SH !26 S

    Sh !2 S

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    6/34

    "omputational Model

    ' 'iscrete .lement Model 75/7/5

    .lasto-(lastic +onstitutie Model

    Mohr-+oulom$ 8oint +onstitutie Model

    Su((ort S*stems

    Shotcrete 9+ured )late .lement

    Ri$s .:uialent liner

    Rock ,olt-.lement ;ith /ial and Shear

    Stiffness

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    7/34

    Physico$mechanicalProperties

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    8/34

    Physico$mechanicalProperties

    8oint )ro(erties

    Shear Stiffness JKs = 0.97 GPa/m

    Normal Stiffness JKn = 10 GPa/m

    Cohesion = 0.0 MPa

    Friction = !

    "ensile Stren#th = 0

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    9/34

    %&cavation Se'uence (Support installation

    Central G$llet an% si%e slashin# &ith '.!m

    (ench hei#ht for )o&erho$se

    *$s %$cts to (e e+ca,ate% in ! sta#es

    Press$re shafts -"" manifol%s to (e

    e+ca,ate% lea,in# a le%#e of !m till !00m

    of P

    F$ll2 #ro$te% 32&i%a# (olts of !7t

    ca)acit2 &ith resin en% anchore% an% )re

    tensione% to 1t

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    10/34

    )ac! Analysis ( %valuationSupports

    oc4 *olt Fail$re

    7 (olts at %ifferent ele,ations faile% &hen

    Press$re shaft manifol% 5 &as o)ene%

    *ac4 anal2sis6 re,ie& of s$))ort s2stem

    Ca$ses of roc4 (olt fail$re

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    11/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    12/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    13/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    14/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    15/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    16/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    17/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    18/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    19/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    20/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    21/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    22/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    23/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    24/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    25/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    26/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    27/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    28/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    29/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    30/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    31/34

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    32/34

    Summary ( "onclusions

    "he mo%el co$l% )re%ict the (eha,ior satisfactoril2

    *olt fail$re mechanism co$l% (e e+)laine%

    % The ex!en!s of roc& mass failres ha'e (een

    redced )i!h !he *ro'ision of ri(s in !he cross

    o*enings

    % +i!h o! !he ri(s in !he cross o*enings, en!ire *illar

    (e!)een !he MH and TH ca'erns exhi(i!s failre

    % The *ro'ision of ri(s in !he cross o*enings ha'e

    redced !he horion!al deforma!ion of !he d-s )all.

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    33/34

    Summary ( "onclusions

    % Maximm redc!ion of !he order 40 and 55 is o(ser'ed a!

    / /525M and / 510m res*ec!i'el

    % The redc!ion in !he horion!al deforma!ions in !he -s )all is

    lo)er com*ared !o !hose on !he d-s )all

    % The maximm redc!ion of 40 is o(ser'ed a! / 510. The

    redc!ion in deforma!ion a! /525M on !he -s )all is marginal

    % The effec! of ri(s is no! seen in ser'ice (a area as !he cross

    o*enings do no! exis! !here.

    % The ri(s *ro'ide immedia!e and-or rigid s**or! allo)ing li!!le

    deforma!ion, !here( con!rolling !he dila!ions arond !he

    o*enings

  • 7/23/2019 Discontinuum Modeling of Underground Power House Excavation - A Case Study

    34/34

    Summary ( "onclusions

    % The exis!ing s**or! ss!em in !he machine hall )as

    adea!e

    % 3r!her s!reng!hening measres )ere sgges!ed as follo)s

    1. "m long d)idag (ol!s in *lace of 6m long (ol!s in (s dc!s * !o10m from T

    2. $i( s**or! of SM# 250 a! 50mm c-c in PS manifolds

    7. $i( s**or! of SM# 150 a! 1.0m c-c in D8 from $D 20"0 and

    $D 170155 in -s )all of machine hall

    4. $i( s**or! of SM# 150 a! 1.0m c-c in D8 from $D 090 and

    $D 125145 in d-s )all of machine hall