Development of Lothian Hospitals Plan - EVOC
Transcript of Development of Lothian Hospitals Plan - EVOC
Agenda
• Why a Lothian Hospitals Plan?
• Architecture
• Workstreams
• The relationship between IJBs and “retained services”
• Timescales and process
2
Why a Hospitals Plan?
• To set out how NHS Lothian’s specialist hospital services will respond to;
– Changes in clinical treatment
– Changes in demography
– Financial challenges (£50m+in acute)
– Workforce challenges
– Estate challenges
– Patient safety and quality improvement agenda
4
Why a Hospitals Plan?
• Required
– Integrated Joint Board schemes of establishment
– Legislation
– Our Health, Our Care, Our Future
– NHS Scotland Clinical Strategy
5
Why a Hospitals Plan?
• Good practice
– Respond to IJB Strategic Plans and Directions
– Capital and Revenue Planning
– Workforce Planning
– Organisational focus – make good decisions
6
Why a Hospitals Plan?
• Changes to Scottish Capital Investment Manual
– Requires the story to be told up-front with a strategic assessment
– New national prioritisation tool
7
Principles
• As discussed at SPC 10th December 2015 – All directions must be specific, measurable,
achievable, realistic, and time-limited/defined;
– All directions must have a clear focus on the outcomes to be achieved for citizens;
– All directions must include clear evidence of how they deliver best value for the public;
– All directions should consider how best to reduce variation across the current health board area;
– Directions which have implications for acute hospital services should be explicitly referenced in the NHS Lothian Hospitals Plan.
8
Scope
• Functions delegated to IJBs and delivered in NHSL hospitals
– In the form of a delivery plan for IJB Directions
• Specialist and tertiary acute hospital services
– RIE, WGH, SJH, RHSC/DCN
– Royal Edinburgh Hospital
– Specialised Learning Disabilities Services
9
Architecture
Workstream
Hospital
NHSL Lothian Hospitals Plan
Workstream plan
Efficiency plan focussed on optimal performance
Clinical Horizon Scan
Quality Improvement
Plan DCAQ
Site Options Plan
Capital plan Timetable for
implementation
11
What will the outcome be?
• Proposed site plans for each of our 4 sites
– For consultation with IJBs and the public
– Likely with options for each site
• Capital, revenue, and workforce plans for each site (and hence the acute sector)
• Clarity about how we will shift the balance of care
• Clear response to IJB Strategic Plans
12
What will the outcome be?
• Granular, robust, effectively-argued, consulted-upon and agreed plan for our acute and specialist services
13
Components
• For each workstream
• Conceptualization of the problem
• Identification of objectives
• Horizon scan for new technologies
• Workforce profiling
• Demand, Capacity, Activity, Queue
• Benchmarking and understanding of optimal performance, best value
• Patient safety consideration
14
Key milestones
• Outline document to Board Development Day March 2016
• Reorganisation of Strategic Planning resource to support March 2016
• Workplan for each site – end May
• Options development for each workstream to end November 16
• Site options developed December 16
• Consultation January-March 17
15
Process
• Update to SPC at each meeting
• Formal consultation will be undertaken on the draft Lothian plan
• Annual cycle put in place to revise and update
16
Workstream stages
Work to be done
Finalising the case
Moving to implementation Implementing Complete
18
Implementing
• “We are in the implementation phase – plans clear and agreed, bricks and mortar, recruitment”
• Royal Infirmary Campus and Bioquarter
– RHSC/DCN
• Royal Edinburgh Hospital
– Phase 1
– Learning disability redesign
• St John’s Hospital
– Ward 20 additional capacity
19
Moving to implementation
• “Intent is clear, options are being finalised, case is understood, but to be completed”
• Royal Infirmary Campus and Bioquarter
– Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion
– Major Trauma Centre
– Elective Orthopaedics
– Labs automation
– Integrated Stroke Unit
• Western General Hospital
– Linear Accelerator Capacity
20
Finalising the case
• “We have a rough idea of what we would like to do, but need to make sure the options are right”
• Royal Infirmary Campus and Bioquarter
– Liberton Hospital
– Outpatients Building
– Reprovision of mortuary
• Western General Hospital
– Critical Care expansion
– Robotic Laprascopic surgery
• St John’s Hospital
– Expansion of theatre capacity
21
Finalising the case
• All sites
– How can we deliver a quantum improvement in delayed discharge performance and close inpatient beds as a result?
– How can we reduce inpatient requirement generally?
22
Work to be done (1)
• “We really should do something about that...”
• Across RIE and WGH
– Medical specialties distribution
• Front door
• Transitional care and rehabilitation,
• quantum improvement in management of delayed discharges
– Options appraisals for elective general surgery, urology, gynaecology
• Western General Hospital
– Regional Infectious Diseases Unit
– Edinburgh Cancer Centre
23
Work to be done (2)
• Across RIE, WGH, SJH
– Elective centres concept
– Frailty pathways
• All sites
– Bed bases
– Financial plans
– Quality improvement
24
As at end March 2016 Work to be
done
Finalising the
case
Moving to
implementation
Implementing Complete
Medical
specialties
Liberton PAEP RHSC/DCN
Elective
options
Outpatients
Building
Major Trauma REH 1 and 2
Elective
centres
Mortuary Elective Ortho Learning
Disability
Redesign
Regional
Infectious
Diseases Unit
WGH Critical
Care
Labs automation SJH Ward 20
Edinburgh
Cancer Centre
Robotics Linear
Accelerator
Capacity
RIE Stroke
Unit
Individual
Hospital Plans
SJH
Theatres 25
As at end March 2017
Work to be done Finalising the case Moving to
implementation
Implementing Complete
(new projects) ECC Elective centres
(including SJH
capacity)
PAEP RHSC/DCN
RIDU Elective options Major Trauma REH phase 1
Mortuary Elective ortho SJH Ward 20
WGH Critical Care Linear Accelerator
Capacity
RIE Stroke Unit
Labs Individual Hospital
Plans
LD Redesign
Liberton Lothian Hospitals
Plan
OP Building
Medical Specialties
Robotics
REH phase 2 26
Relationship between IJBs and
“retained services”
• IJB expectations of NHSL will be contained in Directions
• “Retained services” will also have expectations of IJBs...
28
Interdependency – the IJB
perspective...
•Key relationship between IJBs and Acute – unscheduled care, delayed discharges, older people, chronic disease
•What is the IP configuration?
•What do IJB Strategic Plans and directions indicate?
Medical specialties
•Workforce
•Capital builds
•Revenue
•Space created/used
RIE/WGH •Edinburgh Cancer Centre
•RIDU
•SJH Elective Centre
•Et cetera
WGH and SJH
IJB directs NHSL
Responds
NHSL
directs 29
“Retained” expectations of IJBs...
• Delivery of 72-hour DD standard
• Reduction in ED attendances
• Reduction in UC admissions
• Improvements in length of stay
• Improvement in DNA rate
• Supporting Realistic Medicine approach
• ....amongst others...
• ...are these clearly enough signalled in Strategic Plans?
30
Key questions?
• Is the approach clear?
• What is missing?
• Is the plan ambitious – aggressive? – enough?
• How will the Board manage the interdependency between IJBs and retained services?
31