Delivering Real Time Crime Center...
Transcript of Delivering Real Time Crime Center...
Integrated Standards Based Approach Iveta Topalova Justice & Public Safety Architect
Delivering Real Time Crime Center Capabilities
The Information Challenge
• Information Underload
“Approximately 100,000 justice agencies have the critical need to share information across their various information systems, and this variety creates multiple layers of interoperability problems because hardware, software, networks, and business rules for data exchange are different.” *
• Information Overload
“Many local and State officials decry the multitude of systems that the local and State agencies must access to use and stay informed. Ultimately, it results in inefficiency and information overload.” **
**RUSSEL PORTER: A REPORT CARD ON HOMELAND SECURITY INFORMATION SHARING
*Global Justice Reference Architecture Framework
A RTCC Day in the Life Scenario Situational Awareness
Operational Deconfliction
Criminal Justice Information
Systems Automation
Automated Information
Dissemination
Situational Awareness
Notifications
Real Time Alerting and Analysis
Electronic Form Submission and
Workflow
Work Assignment &
Management Investigative Coordination and
Collaboration
Structured/Unstructured Data
Aggregation and Analysis
Community Outreach and
Collaboration
Cross Jurisdiction / Cross
Discipline Collaboration
Pattern Analysis
Executive Dashboards
Federated Query
911 Call
Complex Requirements and Data
Scalability, Agility, Sustainability
Police Data Courts Corrections Other
Local State Federal Public
Public Safety Integration Solution
Video
VMS
Existing Systems and Assets
Situational Awareness and
Operational Deconfliction
Investigative Coordination
and Collaboration
Executive Dashboards
and Pattern Analysis
Field, Patrol, Investigation, Analysts, Department …
…
The Interoperability Challenge
Security & Privacy
variety of
credentialing &
access rules
different
architectures
& technologies
Architecture
data stored &
interpreted
disparately
Data Model
Standardizing Information Exchanges with NIEM
Autonomous organizations use different
vocabularies to describe people, things,
places and events
NIEM creates a common semantic
understanding among participating
organizations
Standardizing architecture with the GRA
Existing systems are mostly custom built,
use custom integration, and exemplify silos
of data: it is costly to share information
SheriffJail
District
Attorney Courts
Jail Intake
JMS
ECEF
Booking
System
Jury
DMS
CMS
The GRA provides inherent agility and
scalability on multiple levels for federal,
state, local and tribal information sharing
Standardizing security with GFIPM
Globally understood user
metadata and trust across
federated systems enables
interoperability….
and enables integration of criminal
justice applications at the user level.
Integrated Standards Based Solution
Best
Practices
variety of
credentialing &
access rules
different
architectures
&
technologies
data stored &
interpreted
disparately
GFIPM
Privacy
Technology
GRA
NIEM
Governance
Situational Awareness and Operational Deconfliction
Real time unified and comprehensive visibility into information and events from disparate data sources
• Geospatial Visualization
• Video-monitoring Integration
• Correlation
• Alerting
• Resource Tracking
Investigative Coordination and Collaboration
Discover, Connect and Communicate Critical to the Investigation Information
• List View
• Map View
• Link View
• Card View
Executive Dashboards and Pattern Analysis
• Analyze performance and efficiency
• Discover patterns and trends
• Pre-created and ad-hoc reports
13
© 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries.
The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market
conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation.
MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.